DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Summary Silvercup West FEIS Executive Summary Executive Summary Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. ES-1 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. ES-1 B. PROPOSED BUILDING PROGRAM ................................................................... ES-3 C. REQUIRED ACTIONS AND APPROVALS............................................................. ES-7 D. LAND USE, ZONING, AND PUBLIC POLICY.......................................................ES-11 E. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ...................................................................ES-12 F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER .....................................................................ES-15 G. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES .........................................................ES-16 H. OPEN SPACE ........................................................................................ES-17 I. SHADOWS ...........................................................................................ES-18 J. HISTORIC RESOURCES.............................................................................ES-19 K. TRAFFIC AND PARKING ............................................................................ES-21 L. TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIANS ......................................................................ES-23 M. AIR QUALITY........................................................................................ES-24 N. NOISE ...............................................................................................ES-26 O. INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................ES-27 P. SOLID WASTE ......................................................................................ES-27 Q. ENERGY..............................................................................................ES-27 R. NATURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................ES-28 S. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..........................................................................ES-29 T. URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL RESOURCES .......................................................ES-30 U. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS..........................................................................ES-32 V. WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM.......................................................ES-34 W. PUBLIC HEALTH.....................................................................................ES-35 X. GENERIC ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS FROM SALT PILE RELOCATION ..............................ES-35 Y. MITIGATION.........................................................................................ES-36 Z. ALTERNATIVES......................................................................................ES-37 AA. UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS ................................................ES-44 BB. GROWTH-INDUCING ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................ES-44 CC. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES..........................ES-45 SILVERCUP WEST FEIS ES-i Executive Summary: Table of Contents List of Tables TABLE ES-1: PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND POTENTIAL VARIATIONS ...................ES-2 TABLE ES-2: OPEN SPACE .................................................................................ES-5 TABLE ES-3: 2009 NO BUILD VERSUS BUILD WEEKDAY TRAFFIC LOS SUMMARY ...............ES-21 TABLE ES-4: 2009 NO BUILD VERSUS BUILD SATURDAY MIDDAY TRAFFIC LOS SUMMARY...................................................................................ES-22 TABLE ES-5: SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION SUMMARY................................ES-23 TABLE ES-6: FUTURE WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION (2009) – MAXIMUM 8-HOUR CO LEVELS......................................................................................ES-24 TABLE ES-7: FUTURE WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION (2009) – MAXIMUM PM2.5 INCREMENTAL IMPACTS ...................................................................ES-25 TABLE ES-8: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTED DURATIONS............................ES-33 TABLE ES-9: SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION SUMMARY................................ES-36 SILVERCUP WEST FEIS ES-ii Executive Summary A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Purpose & Need The purpose and need for the Project include: • The need to meet current and anticipated demand for film and television production facilities that conform to industry standards; • The need to compete against other venues offering film and television production facilities; • The need to support the redevelopment of Long Island City as a “24-hour” neighborhood containing a mix of industrial, commercial, residential, retail, cultural and open space uses contributing to the vitality of Queens as a whole; and • The need to provide improved access to the East River waterfront from locations in Queens. 2. Project Description Terra Cotta, LLC (the Applicant) seeks approval by the CPC of an amendment to the zoning map for the area bounded by the northern boundary of the existing M1-4 district to the north at the northern limit of the Queensboro Bridge, the midpoint of Vernon Boulevard to the east, the midpoint of 43rd Avenue to the south, and the East River to the west (the Rezoning Area). The Rezoning Area comprises Block 477, Lots 7, 13, 15, 20 and 24. In addition, the Applicant is seeking related CPC and Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA) approvals to enable development of an approximately 2.77 million gsf mixed-use development (Silvercup West) on Block 477, Lots 13, 15, 20, and 24 (the Project Site). The Project Site is bounded by the Queensboro Bridge on the north, Vernon Boulevard on the east, 43rd Avenue on the south, and the East River on the west. The approximately 6.0-acre Project Site, which is located within an M1-4 district and in an area covered by the Waterfront Access Plan Q-1 (WAP) for Northern Hunters Point, is currently occupied, in part, by a temporary New York Power Authority (NYPA) facility on Lot 24, the former New York Architectural Terra Cotta Company building on Lot 20, and a New York City Department of Sanitation (DSNY) open storage pile of sand and salt located within the mapped but unopened segment of 43rd Avenue on the southern edge of the Project Site. Both the NYPA facility and DSNY storage pile would be moved prior to construction. Vacant land on the Project Site (following the removal of the NYPA facility) would be replaced by approximately 2.77 million gsf (approximately 2.10 million zoning square feet [zsf]) of new mixed use development containing a broad range of uses, including television and film production studios, residential, office, retail, museum and/or other cultural or community facilities, a health club, and a catering facility. Development of Silvercup West would conform to either a Preferred Development Program or one of three Variations. The Preferred Development Program and its three Variations are summarized in Table ES-1. SILVERCUP WEST FEIS ES-1 Executive Summary TABLE ES-1: PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND POTENTIAL VARIATIONS Preferred Development Variation 1 Variation 2 Variation 3 Program (Residential) (Studio) (Residential and Studio) Use (gsf) (gsf) (gsf) (gsf) Residential 1,044,970 1,700,018 1,044,970 1,700,018 Commercial 816,538 161,490 816,538 161,490 Office 655,048 0 655,048 0 Retail 76,581 76,581 76,581 76,581 Health Club 40,013 40,013 40,013 40,013 Catering 44,896 44,896 44,896 44,896 Cultural/Community Facility 126,401 126,401 0 0 Studio/Studio Support 346,574 346,574 473,282 473,282 Loading/Parking 433,761 433,761 433,761 433,761 TOTAL Floor Area 2,768,551 2,768,551 2,768,551 2,768,551 Public Open Space (Upland Connection and 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Esplanade) As indicated in Table ES-1, some aspects of the development program would be the same in all the Variations. These include the retail and restaurant space, the catering facility and the health club. However, the Variations differ from the Preferred Development Program in terms of the amounts of residential space, office and support space, and the cultural facility space. Specifically: • One variation (Variation 1: Residential) would replace the 655,048 gsf of office space with an equivalent amount of residential space containing 655 apartments. • A second variation (Variation 2: Studio) would replace the 126,401 gsf cultural facility with an equivalent amount of studio and studio support space, including two additional studios. • A third variation (Variation 3: Residential and Studio) would replace the 655,048 gsf of office space with an equivalent amount of residential space containing 655 apartments and would replace the 126,401 gsf cultural facility with an equivalent amount of studio and studio support space, including two additional studios. Total floor area would be the same with the Preferred Development Program and each of its three Variations. The floor-area ratio (FAR) of the proposed project would be approximately 7.9 with the Preferred Development Program or any of the three Variations. Final selection of the program to be developed would depend on market conditions at the time of development. In all cases, the development would be subject to a Restrictive Declaration, which would result in the same bulk and building envelope in the Preferred Development Program and the three Variations. The Preferred Development Program and each of the three Variations would provide approximately 1,400
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz
    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 120 countries and speaking more than 135 languages1. The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population2. Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest foreign-born population in the entire city3. Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. This is primarily due to linguistic and cultural barriers. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28% of the Borough4, indicating a need for a wide range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Borough President is actively working with the Queens General Assembly, a working group organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of these issues. Cultural Queens is amidst a cultural transformation. The Borough is home to some of the most iconic buildings and structures in the world, including the globally recognized Unisphere and New York State Pavilion. Areas like Astoria and Long Island City are establishing themselves as major cultural hubs. In early 2014, the New York City Council designated the area surrounding Kaufman Astoria Studios as the city’s first arts district through a City Council Proclamation The areas unique mix of adaptively reused residential, commercial, and manufacturing buildings serve as a catalyst for growth in culture and the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • LIC Comprehensive Plan Phase 1
    LONG ISLAND CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PHASE 1 LONG ISLAND CITY Phase Comprehensive Plan 1 SUMMARY REPORT 1 LONG ISLAND CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PHASE 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Long Island City Comprehensive Plan has received pivotal support from public and private funders: NYS Senator Michael Gianaris NYC Economic Development Corporation NYS Assemblywoman Catherine Nolan Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. NYC Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito Cornell Tech NYC Council Majority Leader Jimmy Van Bramer Ford Foundation Queens Borough President Melinda Katz TD Charitable Foundation Empire State Development Verizon Foundation NYC Regional Economic Development Council The LICP Board Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee provided invaluable input, feedback and support. Members include, Michelle Adams, Tishman Speyer Richard Dzwlewicz, TD Bank Denise Arbesu, Citi Commercial Bank Meghan French, Cornell Tech David Brause, Brause Realty John Hatfield, Socrates Sculpture Park Tracy Capune, Kaufman Astoria Studios, Inc. Gary Kesner, Silvercup Studios Mary Ceruti, SculptureCenter Seth Pinsky, RXR Realty Ebony Conely-Young, Long Island City YMCA Caryn Schwab, Mount Sinai Queens Carol Conslato, Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. Gretchen Werwaiss, Werwaiss & Co., Inc. Jenny Dixon, The Isamu Noguchi Foundation Jonathan White, White Coffee Corporation and Garden Museum Richard Windram, Verizon Patricia Dunphy, Rockrose Development Corp. Finally, thank you to the businesses and organizations who responded to our survey and to everyone who participated in our focus groups and stakeholder conversations. Your participation was essential to informing this report. Summaries and lists of participants can be found in the Appendices. 2 LONG ISLAND CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PHASE 1 ABOUT THIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Phase 1 of the Comprehensive Plan and this report was completed by Long Island City Partnership with the assistance of Public Works Partners and BJH Advisors.
    [Show full text]
  • School, Administrator and Address Listing
    District/School Zip District/School Name Administrator Address City State Code Telephone ALBANY COUNTY ALBANY CITY SD Dr. Marguerite Vanden Wyngaard Academy Park Albany NY 12207 (518)475-6010 ALBANY HIGH SCHOOL Ms. Cecily Wilson 700 Washington Ave Albany NY 12203 (518)475-6200 ALBANY SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES Mr. C Fred Engelhardt 108 Whitehall Rd Albany NY 12209 (518)462-7258 ARBOR HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ms. Rosalind Gaines-Harrell 1 Arbor Dr Albany NY 12207 (518)475-6625 DELAWARE COMMUNITY SCHOOL Mr. Thomas Giglio 43 Bertha St Albany NY 12209 (518)475-6750 EAGLE POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ms. Kendra Chaires 1044 Western Ave Albany NY 12203 (518)475-6825 GIFFEN MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ms. Jasmine Brown 274 S Pearl St Albany NY 12202 (518)475-6650 MONTESSORI MAGNET SCHOOL Mr. Ken Lein 65 Tremont St Albany NY 12206 (518)475-6675 MYERS MIDDLE SCHOOL Ms. Kimberly Wilkins 100 Elbel Ct Albany NY 12209 (518)475-6425 NEW SCOTLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mr. Gregory Jones 369 New Scotland Ave Albany NY 12208 (518)475-6775 NORTH ALBANY ACADEMY Ms. Lesley Buff 570 N Pearl St Albany NY 12204 (518)475-6800 P J SCHUYLER ACHIEVEMENT ACADEMY Ms. Jalinda Soto 676 Clinton Ave Albany NY 12206 (518)475-6700 PINE HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ms. Vibetta Sanders 41 N Allen St Albany NY 12203 (518)475-6725 SHERIDAN PREP ACADEMY Ms. Zuleika Sanchez-Gayle 400 Sheridan Ave Albany NY 12206 (518)475-6850 THOMAS S O'BRIEN ACAD OF SCI & TECH Mr. Timothy Fowler 94 Delaware Ave Albany NY 12202 (518)475-6875 WILLIAM S HACKETT MIDDLE SCHOOL Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Subway Horror Stories”
    DEDICATION To Governor Cuomo: this book would not have been possible without you. Copyright © 2015 Riders Alliance Stories have been edited for length. All rights reserved. ISBN: 1511953101 ISBN-13: 978-1511953108 ADVANCE PRESS FOR “SUBWAY HORROR STORIES” “According to the Riders Alliance, an advocacy group that collected nearly 400 subway ‘horror’ stories last week to push for an M.T.A. capital plan . people complained of trains never arriving, of dangerously overcrowded platforms and of unintelligible announcements. The scariest stories involved getting stuck on a train underground.” – The New York Times, “New York Today: Subway (Horror) Stories” “If you're looking for something to do while you wait for the 5 train, consider writing a tortured memoir about your commute and sharing it with the Riders Alliance, a transit advocacy group.” – Gothamist, “Subway Fares are Up, and So Are Delays” “New Yorkers who take the subway Sunday talked about their deep-seated fears of claustrophobia (closed spaces), cleithrophobia (getting stuck underground) and chrometophobia (money) [when] the grassroots transit group Riders Alliance held an event, ‘Subway Horror Stories,’ at the Atlantic Avenue- Barclays Center station.” – AM New York, “Oh the horror! Subway riders share tales of woe” “A transit advocacy group has begun a novel campaign it hopes will convince Gov. Andrew Cuomo and state legislators to fund the MTA’s proposed $32 billion capital plan to improve to city’s aging subway system. Members of the Riders Alliance collected ‘subway horror stories’ at Queensboro Plaza in Long Island City during Tuesday’s morning rush hour, part of a weeklong drive throughout the five boroughs.” – Queens Times Ledger, “Riders Pen Complaints About Subway Service” AUTHORS’ NOTE It wasn’t hard to get subway riders to contribute their horror stories when we put out the call.
    [Show full text]
  • Ob R a Architects 315 Church Street 4Th Floor New York
    OBRA ARCHITECTS OBRA ARCHITECTS 315 CHURCH STREET 4TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013 UNITED STATES 19, CHANGGYEONGGUNG-RO 35-GIL JONGNO-GU, SEOUL 03076 KOREA OBRA Curriculum vitae ABOUT Obra Architects was founded in New York City in 2000 Completed work abroad includes a kindergarten for 540 6th AIA NY Design Award. In 2015 Obra was appointed as by Pablo Castro and Jennifer Lee. Obra’s work spans the schoolchildren in Beijing, the design of the main exhibition one of Seoul City Government’s Public Architects and in 2016 realms of architecture on all scales, from master planning for the first Seoul Architecture Biennale, and an ongoing the firm was selected to receive NYC Department of Design and institutional work to the scale of interiors, furniture, residential development in Argentina. and Construction Design Excellence contracts to design the and public art. The firm deploys and develops unique design City’s new public buildings and capital construction projects. solutions involving the latest technology and environmental Obra has produced a body of award-winning projects Pablo Castro was elevated to AIA Fellow in 2018. thinking. recognized by the American Institute of Architects, the Chicago Athenaeum American Architecture Awards, and the Obra is a Minority Women-Owned Business Enterprise Pablo Castro and Jennifer Lee have extensive experience Architectural League of New York, among others. The work certified in the State and City of New York. Their second coordinating complex multidisciplinary design teams, while of Obra has been exhibited widely, and has been featured monograph entitled “Obra Architects Logic: Selected Projects, maintaining award-wining design quality and the highest at the Museum of Modern Art, PS1 Contemporary Art 2003 - 2016” was published by Arkitektur B, Copenhagen in standards of project development and execution.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Snapshot of Long Island City and Astoria, Queens
    An Economic Snapshot of Long Island City and Astoria, Queens Thomas P. DiNapoli Kenneth B. Bleiwas New York State Comptroller Deputy Comptroller Report 13-2010 November 2009 Long Island City and Astoria are the westernmost Highlights parts of Queens, only minutes from Midtown • Private sector employment declined by 2,760 jobs Manhattan. The area benefits from a strong during the first quarter of 2009 compared with transportation network, which has made it the same period last year. attractive to business and residential development. • Manufacturing accounted for 14 percent of the area’s private sector jobs in 2008—a much higher The area is one of the few remaining share than in the City as a whole (3 percent). manufacturing enclaves in New York City. In • From 2002 to 2008, the area’s housing stock recent years, residential development has increased by 4.8 percent (3,640 units) to reach increased, with some activity occurring in former 79,220 units—a faster rate of growth than the manufacturing properties. A growing arts increase citywide (3.6 percent). community has taken root in other spaces. The • About 60 percent of the 6,300 businesses in the Long Island City-Astoria area is also home to two area have fewer than five employees. Only 20 of the nation’s largest television and motion firms have 500 or more employees. picture production studios. • After several years of decline, the population in Employment the area grew by 1.8 percent in 2008 to 178,480, and the area has become increasingly diverse. Private sector employment in the Long Island City-Astoria area1 reached 88,070 jobs in 2008 • The portion of the area population with at least a college degree has risen sharply in recent years, (see Figure 1), a gain of 2,140 jobs (2.5 percent) reaching 36.8 percent in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island City
    DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION INITIATIVE BASIC INFORMATION Regional Economic Development Council (REDC) Region: New York City Municipality Name: New York City Downtown Name: Long Island City County: Queens Downtown Description - Provide an overview of the downtown and summarize the rationale behind nominating this downtown for a Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) award): Long Island City (LIC), known as the Fourth Central Business District of New York City, is an important economic center for the region with a diverse set of industries with good paying jobs. The community is poised for accelerated growth through recent major infusions of both public and private investments. However, these investments have not resulted in a truly integrated community. LIC contains populations who are underserved and who need to be better integrated into the community so that the community’s growth is an opportunity for all. Our proposal as a Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) seeks to build on work funded in part by the Regional Economic Development Council, which identified the need to, and recommended some strategies to, establish better linkages between the massive developments and opportunities now presented for LIC’s future and our local populations, and to help ensure that our community is cohesive and inclusive economically, socially, educationally, and culturally. We seek to maximize our burgeoning community’s assets to become a livable, mixed-use community with abundant connectivity among our residents and workers, to improve the quality of life for all, and to set up lasting means for community inclusion so that the pace and pressure of development in LIC leaves no one behind. As a downtown geographic designation, LIC has a core central district that is dense with commercial and industrial activity as well as new residential growth.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Graffiti Murals: Signs of Hope, Marks of Distinction Patrick Verel [email protected]
    Fordham University DigitalResearch@Fordham Urban Studies Masters Theses Urban Studies 1-1-2013 New York City Graffiti Murals: Signs of Hope, Marks of Distinction Patrick Verel [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://fordham.bepress.com/urban_studies_masters Recommended Citation Verel, Patrick, "New York City Graffiti Murals: Signs of Hope, Marks of Distinction" (2013). Urban Studies Masters Theses. Paper 11. This is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW YORK CITY GRAFFITI MURALS: SIGNS OF HOPE, MARKS OF DISTINCTION By: Patrick Verel B.S., St. John’s University, 1997 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE URBAN STUDIES PROGRAM AT FORDHAM UNIVERSITY NEW YORK May 2013 2 Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgements 3 2. Abstract 4 3. Introduction 4 4. Theoretical Framework 6 5. Interdisciplinary Focus 12 6. A Brief History of Graffiti 16 7: Methodology 17 8. Case Study Manhattan 20 9. Case Study Brooklyn 25 10. Case Study The Bronx 34 11. Case Study Jersey City 42 12. Case Study Staten Island 51 13. Case Study Trenton 61 14. Philadelphia Mural Arts 69 15. NYC Mural Makers 75 16. Graffiti Free New York 81 17. The Clean Slate Fan 86 18. Five Pointz 90 19. Conclusion 100 20. Bibliography 103 21. Appendix I: NYC Anti Graffiti Laws 108 22. Appendix II: Interview Questions 109 3 Acknowledgements This started as a research paper for Introduction to Urban Studies in the fall, 2009 as part of the urban studies masters’ degree at Fordham, and here we are, three years later.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Youth Guide
    the family youth guide A community resource for residents living within Long Island City/Astoria postal codes 11101, 11102 and 11106 The Family Youth Guide A community resource for residents living within Long Island City/Astoria postal codes 11101, 11102 and 11106 Welcome to the Family Youth Guide! The Thomas and Jeanne Elmezzi Private Foundation set out to create this guide in response to the results of a community survey we conducted starting in 2009 called Project 126. You may have even participated in it—and if you did, thank you! The survey found that a majority of respondents chose education as their top priority, demonstrating a strong commitment to youth and the community’s future. According to a City Year Youth Statistic, in 2005 a total of 8,700 students in our target zip codes of Long Island City/Astoria had a need for after-school services that went unmet. Respectively, almost 90 percent of parents in our survey area recognized the importance of investing in after-school programs or out-of-school programs in their community. This affirms a clear need to connect youth more effectively with programs and services in this community. This guide was designed to objectively compile information about the availability of programs in zip codes 11101, 11102, 11106 that serve children and youth ages 0 to 18 and their families. All of the programs listed are available right in your community, and they are here to serve you. Programs are free of charge unless otherwise noted. There are over 120 programs in this booklet, and we tried to organize them in a way that will help you find what you’re looking for.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Participation Plan for Former Hygrade Polishing and Plating Co
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Brownfield Cleanup Program Citizen Participation Plan for Former Hygrade Polishing and Plating Co. 22-07 41st Avenue Long Island City, New York 11101 June 2016 Contents Section Page Number 1. What is New York’s Brownfield Cleanup Program? ...........................................................3 2. Citizen Participation Activities ...............................................................................................3 3. Major Issues of Public Concern .............................................................................................8 4. Site Information .......................................................................................................................8 5. Investigation and Cleanup Process ......................................................................................10 Appendix A Project Contacts and Locations of Reports and Information ......................................................................................................................13 Appendix B Site Contact List ....................................................................................................15 Appendix C Site Location Map .................................................................................................23 Appendix D Brownfield Cleanup Program Process ................................................................24 * * * * * Note: The information presented in this Citizen Participation Plan was current as of the date of its
    [Show full text]
  • Brownfield Cleanup Program Citizen Participation Plan for 42-11 9 Th Street
    Brownfield Cleanup Program Citizen Participation Plan for 42-11 9 th Street November 2019 BCP Site No. C241237 42-11 9th Street Long Island City, NY 11101 www.dec.ny.gov Contents Section Page Number 1. What is New York’s Brownfield Cleanup Program? ............................................. 3 2. Citizen Participation Activities................................................................................ 3 3. Major Issues of Public Concern .............................................................................. 9 4. Site Information ........................................................................................................ 9 5. Investigation and Cleanup Process ..................................................................... 12 Appendices Appendix A - Project Contacts and Locations of Reports and Information Appendix B - Site Contact List Appendix C - Site Location Map Appendix D - Brownfield Cleanup Program Process * * * * * Note: The information presented in this Citizen Participation Plan was current as of the date of its approval by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Portions of this Citizen Participation Plan may be revised during the site’s investigation and cleanup process. 2 Applicant: RXR 42-11 9 th Holdings LLC (“Applicant”) Site Name: 42-11 9th Street (“Site”) Site Address: 42-11 9th Street Site County: Queens County Site Number: C241237 1. What is New York’s Brownfield Cleanup Program? New York’s Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP) works with private developers to encourage the voluntary cleanup of contaminated properties known as “brownfields” so that they can be reused and developed. These uses include recreation, housing, and business. A brownfield is any real property that is difficult to reuse or redevelop because of the presence or potential presence of contamination. A brownfield typically is a former industrial or commercial property where operations may have resulted in environmental contamination. A brownfield can pose environmental, legal, and financial burdens on a community.
    [Show full text]
  • Brownfield Cleanup Program Application
    Brownfield Cleanup Program Application Former Hygrade Polishing and Plating Co. Site 22-07 41st Avenue Long Island City, New York October 2014 Prepared for: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Remediation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-7020 On Behalf of: Stalingrad Ventures LLC 320 Northern Blvd. Great Neck, NY 11021 Prepared by: CA RICH CONSULTANTS, INC. 17 Dupont Street Plainview, NY 11803-1614 (516) 576-8844 October 22, 2014 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Remediation 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-7020 Attention: Kelly Lewandowski, Chief, Site Control Section Re: Brownfield Cleanup Program Application Third Submission Former Hygrade Polishing and Plating Co. 22-07 41st Avenue Long Island City, New York Dear Ms. Lewandowski: Please find the attached Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP) Application for the above- referenced project. As requested, one complete paper hardcopy of this Application has been sent to your office along with a digital CD of the same, and one paper hardcopy and CD has also been sent to the Region 2 office. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this BCP Application on behalf of Stalingrad Ventures, LLC and look forward to moving ahead with the necessary remedial activities under the BCP. If you have questions or need any additional detail regarding the completeness of this Application, please do not hesitate to call us. Respectfully submitted, CA RICH CONSULTANTS, INC. Eric A. Weinstock Vice President cc: Jane O’Connell, NYSDEC Region 2 James Periconi, Esq. Stalingrad Ventures, LLC 17 Dupont Street, Plainview, NY 11803 ■ Tel. 516.576.8844 ■ Fax.
    [Show full text]