DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic and Social Council in Its Decision 1997/245 (See Also E/CN.4/1995/39, E/CN.4/1996/57, E/CN.4/1997/32, E/CN.4/1998/39 and E/CN.4/1999/60)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic and Social Council in Its Decision 1997/245 (See Also E/CN.4/1995/39, E/CN.4/1996/57, E/CN.4/1997/32, E/CN.4/1998/39 and E/CN.4/1999/60) UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2000/61 21 February 2000 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty-sixth session Item 11 (d) of the provisional agenda CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE QUESTIONS OF: INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY, ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, IMPUNITY Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Mr. Param Cumaraswamy, submitted in accordance with Commission resolution 1999/31 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Executive summary............................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 - 2 6 I. TERMS OF REFERENCE ......................................................... 3 - 6 6 II. METHODS OF WORK.............................................................. 7 8 III. ACTIVITIES OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ................... 8 - 26 8 A. Consultations ....................................................................... 8 - 10 8 B. Missions/visits ..................................................................... 11 - 15 9 C. Communications with governmental authorities ................. 16 - 20 9 GE.00-11177 (E) E/CN.4/2000/61 page 2 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page D. Cooperation with intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.......................................... 21 10 E. Cooperation with other United Nations procedures and bodies ............................................................................ 22 - 26 10 IV. THEORETICAL ISSUES........................................................... 27 - 32 12 A. Honour killings .................................................................... 27 - 28 12 B. Judicial corruption ............................................................... 29 - 30 12 C. Human rights defenders ....................................................... 31 - 32 12 V. STANDARDS............................................................................. 33 - 35 13 VI. JUDICIAL DECISIONS REFLECTING THE INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY.......................... 36 - 37 13 VII. SITUATIONS IN SPECIFIC COUNTRIES OR TERRITORIES ........................................................................... 38 - 328 14 Argentina..................................................................................... 40 - 42 15 Australia...................................................................................... 43 - 45 15 Bahrain ...................................................................................... 46 - 49 16 Belarus ...................................................................................... 50 - 56 17 Belgium ...................................................................................... 57 - 69 18 Belize ...................................................................................... 70 - 76 20 Bolivia ...................................................................................... 77 - 78 21 Boznia and Herzegovina ............................................................. 79 - 82 21 Brazil ...................................................................................... 83 - 89 22 Cambodia .................................................................................... 90 - 92 23 Cameroon.................................................................................... 93 - 98 24 Chile ...................................................................................... 99 - 100 25 China ...................................................................................... 101 - 117 26 Colombia..................................................................................... 118 - 126 30 Croatia ...................................................................................... 127 - 128 32 Cuba ...................................................................................... 129 - 132 32 Democratic Republic of the Congo............................................. 133 - 136 33 E/CN.4/2000/61 page 3 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Djibouti ...................................................................................... 137 - 142 34 Egypt ...................................................................................... 143 - 147 35 Equatorial Guinea ....................................................................... 148 - 149 36 Gambia ...................................................................................... 150 - 152 37 Guatemala ................................................................................... 153 - 156 37 Haiti ...................................................................................... 157 - 159 38 Indonesia ..................................................................................... 160 - 163 39 Iran (Islamic Republic of)........................................................... 164 - 166 39 Israel ...................................................................................... 167 - 169 40 Japan ...................................................................................... 170 - 186 41 Kenya ...................................................................................... 187 - 190 44 Lebanon ...................................................................................... 191 - 192 44 Malaysia...................................................................................... 193 - 207 45 Mexico ...................................................................................... 208 - 210 48 Nepal ...................................................................................... 211 - 212 49 New Zealand ............................................................................... 213 - 217 49 Pakistan ...................................................................................... 218 - 230 51 Palestine ...................................................................................... 231 - 232 53 Paraguay...................................................................................... 233 - 234 54 Peru ...................................................................................... 235 - 237 54 Philippines................................................................................... 238 - 239 55 Rwanda ...................................................................................... 240 - 242 55 Saudi Arabia................................................................................ 243 - 244 56 South Africa ................................................................................ 245 - 246 56 Sri Lanka..................................................................................... 247 - 259 56 Sudan ...................................................................................... 260 - 264 59 Suriname ..................................................................................... 265 - 269 60 Switzerland ................................................................................. 270 - 272 61 Trinidad and Tobago................................................................... 273 - 274 61 E/CN.4/2000/61 page 4 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page Tunisia ...................................................................................... 275 - 286 62 Turkey ...................................................................................... 287 - 302 64 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland............. 303 - 322 67 Yemen ...................................................................................... 323 - 324 71 Yugoslavia .................................................................................. 325 - 328 71 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... 329 - 341 72 A. Conclusions.......................................................................... 329 - 334 72 B. Recommendations................................................................ 335 - 341 73 E/CN.4/2000/61 page 5 Executive summary This is the sixth annual report of the Special Rapporteur whose mandate, created by Commission resolution 1994/41, called upon him: (a) To inquire into any substantial allegations transmitted to him or her and report his or her conclusions thereon; (b) To identify and record not only attacks on the independence of the judiciary, lawyers and court officials but also progress achieved in protecting and enhancing their independence, and make recommendations including the provision of advisory services or technical assistance when they are requested by the State concerned; (c) To study, for the purpose of making proposals, important and topical questions of principle with a view to protecting and enhancing the independence of the judiciary and lawyers. The report contains seven chapters dealing with his methods of work, the activities undertaken during the year, some theoretical issues, some judicial decisions reflecting the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, situations in 51 countries or territories and his conclusions and recommendations. During the year the Special Rapporteur sent out several interventions including 11 urgent appeals and 19 urgent appeals in association with other special rapporteurs. In the course of the year, the Special Rapporteur undertook a visit to Guatemala and a separate report on this mission will be before the Commission. The Special Rapporteur has expressed his disappointment and embarrassment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • C.A. 767 2014.Pdf
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: MR. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA MR. JUSTICE SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD Civil Appeal No. 767 of 2014 and C. M. A. No. 565-K/2013 (On appeal against the judgment dated 10.07.2013 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi, in C.P.No. D-2643/2012) Sindh Revenue Board through its Chairman, Government of Sindh and another…………………….Appellants Versus The Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan through its Airport Manager, Jinnah International Airport, Karachi…………………………Respondent For Appellant No. 1: Mr. Farooq H. Naek, Senior ASC For Appellant No. 2: Mr. Khalid Javed Khan, ASC Mr. Fouzi Zafar, ASC Raja Abdul Ghafoor, AOR For the Respondents: Syed Naveed Amjad Andrabi, ASC On behalf of Federation: Mr. Muhammad Waqar Rana, Additional Attorney General On behalf of Govt. of Sindh: Mr. Sabtain Mehmood, Additional Advocate General Dates of Hearing: April 6, 12 and 13, 2017 JUDGMENT Qazi Faez Isa, J: The High Court of Sindh at Karachi allowed a petition filed by the Civil Aviation Authority (“CAA”) under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (“the Constitution”). The CAA, which was established under the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority Ordinance, 1982 (“the CAA Ordinance”), had filed the said petition challenging the imposition of sales tax on services levied upon it under the Sindh Sales Tax on C. A. No. 767/2014. 2 Services Act, 2011 (hereinafter “the Act”) and the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Rules, 2011 (hereinafter “the Rules”). 2. The learned Division Bench of the High Court allowed the petition filed by CAA and declared that CAA was, “not liable to pay the tax under the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011”, consequently, all demands made, proceedings initiated, orders passed or notices issued to CAA under the Act and the Rules were quashed and set aside.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate of Pakistan Debates Contents
    THE SENATE OF PAKISTAN DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT Tuesday, November 13, 2012 (87th Session) Volume XI No. 04 (Nos.01-10) CONTENTS Pages 1. Recitation from the Holy Quran. .………....…….. 1 2. Questions and Answers …………………………. 2-24 3. Leave of Absence………………………………... 25 4. Presentation of Report of the Standing Committee on Defence and Defence Production……………... 26 5. Privilege Motion Misconduct of I.G. Punjab...................................... 27-28 6. Legislative Business The Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan Bill, 2012………………………………………… 29 7. Point of Order Misappropriation in Senate Housing Society and other Societies…………………….................. 30-36 8. Resolution Felicitation to the Hindu Community of Pakistan on Diwali ……………………………………….. 37-44 Printed and Published by the Senate Secretariat, Islamabad. Volume XI SP.XI(04)/2012 No.04 15 SENATE OF PAKISTAN SENATE DEBATES Tuesday, November 13, 2012 The Senate of Pakistan met in the Senate Hall (Parliament House) Islamabad, at forty five minutes past four in the evening with Mr. Chairman (Syed Nayyar Hussain Bokhari) in the Chair. ---------------- Recitation from the Holy Quran ‰ ‰ ‰ ª‰ ª ª ‰‰ ‚‚ÂÂş ‰ - ‰ ‰ ‰ ª⁄ª ªªÂ‚ ‚ „ ‚ÂÂ!ª‹ #≈‹ ªč&' ª&‚‚‚ „‚ ‚ ‚ ‚‚ ‚ , ‚ ,!(ª)ª'* ª+'' , , . ("45) 6783 9!7 23 !()'* +'' / 0 # , ., , , . 1 1 C ( :;" 9 <5=!>25 9?2 +@AB, ,,, D " +@! , H =: '* EF " B#$&) +!7?G''* , , , , , /" 2! , , E;"M)''* , , / K "L1 1 1 OOO IG + %
    [Show full text]
  • Beautiful, Eloquent, Passionate Benazir Bhutto, Once Pakistan's
    14/05/2015 Fall of Queen Bibi: From the hope of a nation to money­launderer | The Times Fall of Queen Bibi: From the hope of a nation to money­launderer by Burhan Wazir Published at 12:00AM, August 7 2003 Beautiful, eloquent, passionate ­ Benazir Bhutto, once Pakistan’s great political hope, has been convicted of money­laundering MOHTARMA BENAZIR BHUTTO, or Bibi as she is affectionately known in Pakistan, has been feeling homesick for some time. Two weeks ago, at a party in Dubai to celebrate her 50th birthday, the exiled former Prime Minister chose to honour the occasion with a self­penned poem. The nine pages of closely typed print, written as a commemorative account of both past achievements and unfolding glories, make for enlightening reading. Recalling Pakistan, a country now governed by General Pervez Musharraf, she writes: My spirit is in one place My body in another My mind torn asunder The Elections were so Unfair Made of Broken Promises Billions spent in marketing A dictatorship as a democracy. The words appear to indicate an arrogant conceit; as if Bhutto feels she was destined to lead her country for ever. Or perhaps, having been in exile now for four years, she simply has too much time on her hands. Later, however, she writes as if dreaming of a return: We will raise buildings Where there are deserts And stop the weeping of the women of the land. Cry not. For Bhutto, a return to Pakistan must now seem more distant a prospect than ever. On Tuesday an investigating magistrate in Switzerland found Bhutto and her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, guilty of money­laundering.
    [Show full text]
  • Case of Maya Indigenous Communities of Belize, Inter-Am
    REPORT Nº 96/03 CASE 12.053 MAYA INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF THE TOLEDO DISTRICT BELIZE October 24, 2003 I. SUMMARY 1. This report concerns a petition presented to the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (the "Commission”) against the State of Belize (the "State" or “Belize”) on August 7, 1998 by the Indian Law Resource Center and the Toledo Maya Cultural Council (the “Petitioners”). The petition claims that the State is responsible for violating rights under the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (the “American Declaration”) that the Mopan and Ke’kchi Maya People of the Toledo District of Southern Belize (the “Maya people of the Toledo District” or the “Maya people”) are alleged to have over certain lands and natural resources.1 2. The Petitioners claim that the State has violated Articles I, II, III, VI, XI, XVIII, XX and XXIII of the American Declaration in respect of lands traditionally used and occupied by the Maya people, by granting logging and oil concessions in and otherwise failing to adequately protect those lands, failing to recognize and secure the territorial rights of the Maya people in those lands, and failing to afford the Maya people judicial protection of their rights and interests in the lands due to delays in court proceedings instituted by them. According to the Petitioners, the State’s contraventions have impacted negatively on the natural environment upon which the Maya people depend for subsistence, have jeopardized the Maya people and their culture, and threaten to cause further damage in the future. 3. The State has indicated before the Commission that applicable law and the facts presented by the Petitioners are unclear as to whether the Maya people may have aboriginal rights in the lands under dispute, although at the same time it has recognized in negotiations outside of the Commission proceedings that the Maya people have rights in lands in the Toledo District based upon their longstanding use and occupancy of that territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Address of the Hon. Chief Justice, Sir Isaac Hyatali, T.C
    ADDRESS OF THE HON. CHIEF JUSTICE, SIR ISAAC HYATALI, T.C. AT THE OPENING OF THE LAW TERM IN THE HALL OF JUSTICE, RED HOUSE, PORT- OF -SPAIN ON 3 OCTOBER, 1980 Mr. President of the Bar Association et al. We formally begin today the 19th Law Term of the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago. Sittings however of the High Court and the Court of Appeal to dispose of the matters on their respective calendars will not begin until Monday 6 October 1980. FIFTEEN JUDGES For the very first time in its history the High Court then will be manned by 15 judges. Two of them are practising members of the Bar who will be giving up their respective practices for three months certain at no little sacrifice to themselves to serve the Country as Judges. They are Mr. Martin Daly of the Senior Bar and Mr. Trevor Lee of the Junior Bar. MR. JAMES DAVIS Mr. James Davis, a practising member of the Bar, was the first to make such a sacrifice. He joined us in May for three months and at my special request continued for another two months but I regret exceedingly to say that I failed to persuade him to allow me to propose him to the Judicial and Legal Service Commission as an eminently qualified and suitable candidate for permanent judicial office on the High Court Bench. The unattractive salary and conditions of service of a Judge made it impossible for him to give serious consideration to my offer. It is fitting to place on record, and I do so with a sense of gratitude and pleasure that he discharged his judicial duties with ability, dignity and efficiency, and that he did so in response to my appeal to fit and proper and respected members of the Bar to come forward and assist the Supreme Court to discharge its onerous and responsible functions with greater speed and efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Orozco V AG(Belize)
    Human Dignity Trust Belize scraps law targeting gay men 10 August 2016 Small Caribbean state sheds colonial legacy law FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 10 August 2016 Orozco v Attorney General of Belize (Belize High Court 10 August 2016) Summary: Criminalisation of homosexuality declared unconstitutional. By a judgment handed down on 10 August 2016 the Chief Justice of Belize held that provisions in the Belize Criminal Code purporting to criminalise private consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex breached the Constitution of Belize and so should be declared void. In doing so the Chief Justice upheld the claim brought by the Belizean activist Caleb Orozco against the Government of Belize. The Chief Justice held that laws purporting to criminalise private homosexual conduct breached the rights to dignity, privacy, equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Belize Constitution and so were void. Mr Orozco’s arguments were supported by the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, The Human Dignity Trust and the International Commission of Jurists (the Interveners). The decision of the Chief Justice represented the first occasion on which any Caribbean Court had determined such a constitutional challenge. Press Release: A law in Belize that disproportionately affects gay men was today ruled unconstitutional by the country’s Supreme Court after a three-year wait for the judgment. Section 53 of Belize’s Criminal Code, an old British colonial law, banned ‘carnal intercourse against the order of nature’ and thereby made consensual gay sex between adult men in private illegal in Belize. Today the legal provision has been ruled ‘unlawful’ to the extent that it can be applied to same-sex activity.
    [Show full text]
  • MAYA LEADERS ALLIANCE (MLA) Belize
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. MAYA LEADERS ALLIANCE (MLA) Belize Equator Initiative Case Studies Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES Local and indigenous communities across the world are 126 countries, the winners were recognized for their advancing innovative sustainable development solutions achievements at a prize ceremony held in conjunction that work for people and for nature. Few publications with the United Nations Convention on Climate Change or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives (COP21) in Paris. Special emphasis was placed on the evolve, the breadth of their impacts, or how they change protection, restoration, and sustainable management over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories of forests; securing and protecting rights to communal with community practitioners themselves guiding the lands, territories, and natural resources; community- narrative. The Equator Initiative aims to fill that gap. based adaptation to climate change; and activism for The Equator Initiative, supported by generous funding environmental justice. The following case study is one in from the Government of Norway, awarded the Equator a growing series that describes vetted and peer-reviewed Prize 2015 to 21 outstanding local community and best practices intended to inspire the policy dialogue indigenous peoples initiatives to reduce poverty, protect needed to take local success to scale, to improve the global nature, and strengthen resilience in the face of climate knowledge base on local environment and development change. Selected from 1,461 nominations from across solutions, and to serve as models for replication. PROJECT SUMMARY KEY FACTS Maya Leaders Alliance (MLA) is a coalition of Maya Equator Prize Winner organizations and leaders collectively working to 2015 promote the long-term well-being of the Maya people through defending their collective rights to Founded their territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Who in Pakistan & Who Is Who in the World Study Material
    1 Who is Who in Pakistan Lists of Government Officials (former & current) Governor Generals of Pakistan: Sr. # Name Assumed Office Left Office 1 Muhammad Ali Jinnah 15 August 1947 11 September 1948 (died in office) 2 Sir Khawaja Nazimuddin September 1948 October 1951 3 Sir Ghulam Muhammad October 1951 August 1955 4 Iskander Mirza August 1955 (Acting) March 1956 October 1955 (full-time) First Cabinet of Pakistan: Pakistan came into being on August 14, 1947. Its first Governor General was Muhammad Ali Jinnah and First Prime Minister was Liaqat Ali Khan. Following is the list of the first cabinet of Pakistan. Sr. Name of Minister Ministry 1. Liaqat Ali Khan Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, Defence Minister, Minister for Commonwealth relations 2. Malik Ghulam Muhammad Finance Minister 3. Ibrahim Ismail Chundrigar Minister of trade , Industries & Construction 4. *Raja Ghuzanfar Ali Minister for Food, Agriculture, and Health 5. Sardar Abdul Rab Nishtar Transport, Communication Minister 6. Fazal-ul-Rehman Minister Interior, Education, and Information 7. Jogendra Nath Mandal Minister for Law & Labour *Raja Ghuzanfar’s portfolio was changed to Minister of Evacuee and Refugee Rehabilitation and the ministry for food and agriculture was given to Abdul Satar Pirzada • The first Chief Minister of Punjab was Nawab Iftikhar. • The first Chief Minister of NWFP was Abdul Qayum Khan. • The First Chief Minister of Sindh was Muhamad Ayub Khuro. • The First Chief Minister of Balochistan was Ataullah Mengal (1 May 1972), Balochistan acquired the status of the province in 1970. List of Former Prime Ministers of Pakistan 1. Liaquat Ali Khan (1896 – 1951) In Office: 14 August 1947 – 16 October 1951 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandating Recognition International Law and Native/ Aboriginal Title
    Mandating Recognition International Law and Native/ Aboriginal Title Owen J. Lynch ABOUT THE AUTHOR Owen J. Lynch is currently a professorial lecturer at the University of the Philippines College of Law and a RRI Fellow. Previously he has worked as a senior attorney and managing director of the Law and Communities and Human Rights and Environment programs at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) in Washington, DC, (1997-2006) and as a Senior Associate at the World Resources Institute (1990-96). His substantive focus is on environmental justice, law and sustainable development, and his special expertise is on community-based property rights (CBPRs) and their legal recognition in national and international law. THE RIGHTS AND RESOURCES INITIATIVE The Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) is a strategic coalition comprised of international, regional, and community organizations engaged in development, research and conservation to advance forest tenure, policy and market re- forms globally. The mission of the Rights and Resources Initiative is to support local communities’ and indigenous peoples’ struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market and legal reforms that secure their rights to own, control, and benefit from natural resources, especially land and forests. RRI is coordinated by the Rights and Resources Group, a non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.rightsandresources.org. PARTNERS ACICAFOC SUPPORTERS Rights and Resources Initiative Washington DC Mandating Recognition © 2011 Rights and Resources Initiative. Reproduction permitted with attribution ISBN :978-0-9833674-1-3 The views presented here are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by coalition Partners nor by DFID, Ford Foundation, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, Norad, SDC and Sida, who have generously supported this work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate of Pakistan Debates
    THE SENATE OF PAKISTAN DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT Monday, July 18, 2016 (250th Session) Volume VIII, No. 01 (No.01-10) Printed and Published by the Senate Secretariat, Islamabad Volume VIII SP.I(01)/2016 No.1 15 Contents 1. Recitation from the Holy Quran ...................................................................................... 1 2. Panel of Presiding Officers ............................................................................................... 2 3. Leave of Absence ............................................................................................................. 2 4. Fateha ............................................................................................................................... 3 5. Resolution Paying Tribute to Renowned Philanthropist Late Abdul Sattar Edhi .......... 3 By Senator Raja Muhammad Zafar-ul-Haq, Leader of the House ........................... 3 Senator Mohammad Azam Khan Swati .................................................................... 5 Senator Khushbakht Shujat ....................................................................................... 6 Senator Saeed Ghani ................................................................................................. 7 Senator Mushahid Hussain Syed ............................................................................... 9 Senator Ilyas Ahmad Bilour ..................................................................................... 10 Senator Nehal Hashmi ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PAKISTAN KHAPPAY Asif Ali Zardari President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan
    PAKISTAN KHAPPAY Asif Ali Zardari President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Editor Zubair Ahmed Kasuri Assistant Editor Fatima Batool Designer Zafar Khan Afridi Published by Flare Cares Separation by Fotoscan Process Printed by Qasim Naeem Printers Stockist Sultan News Agency First Edition 10,000 (September, 2008) Price PKR 500, US $10 Contact: Islamabad: +92-51-2890054 Fax: +92-51-2891339 E-mail: [email protected] “A HOPE IS LOST” A national asset: Asif Ali Zardari The first book on Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Shaheed after her assassination was launched on January 27, 2008 at Bilawal House, Karachi. It is a pictorial review of Mohtarma’s life with 400 pictures illustrating various aspects of her life. PPP Co-Chairman Asif Ali Zardari while receiving the book from Zubair Ahmed Kasuri acknowledged that the book is really an effort to keep people informed about the various as- pects of their beloved leader Benazir Bhutto. He further accepted that the book is really an asset not only for him but for the nation. He appreciated Zubair Ahmed Kasuri and his team’s efforts in compiling the book in order to make those understand who think that she had taken away the chance of democracy with her. But it seems even beyond the grave, Bhutto still refuse to be defeated hers message is still struggling to prevail in public through the lenses of camera. Karachi: Zubair Ahmed Kasuri presents “A Hope is Lost” to PPP Co-Chairman Asif Ali Zardari at Bilawal House on 27 January, 2008. Preface The victory of Asif Ali Zardari in Pakistan's presidential election represents an extraor- dinary turnaround for the most mistrusted politician in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • REFORM of DISCRIMINATORY SEXUAL OFFENCES LAWS in the COMMONWEALTH and OTHER JURISDICTIONS Case Study of Belize
    REFORM OF DISCRIMINATORY SEXUAL OFFENCES LAWS IN THE COMMONWEALTH AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS Case Study of Belize THE HUMAN DIGNITY TRUST The Human Dignity Trust is an organisation of international lawyers supporting local partners to uphold international and constitutional human rights laws in countries where private, consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex is criminalised. Over 70 jurisdictions globally criminalise consensual same-sex sexual intimacy, putting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (‘LGBT’) people beyond the protection of the law and fostering a climate of fear, stigma, discrimination and violence. The Human Dignity Trust provides technical legal assistance upon request to local human rights defenders, lawyers and governments seeking to eradicate these discriminatory laws. With generous funding from Global Affairs Canada, the Human Dignity Trust has developed a series of case studies on the ways in which Commonwealth governments around the world have achieved reform of these laws and other sexual offences laws that discriminate against women, children, LGBT people and other groups, and initiated the establishment of a Commonwealth Group of Experts on legislative reform comprised of legal, political, academic and other experts with experience in reform of discriminatory sexual offences laws. The research for this series of case studies has been possible thanks to the insight and assistance of members of the Commonwealth Group of Experts, and many others in the relevant countries who helped initiate, steer, inform and implement sexual offences law reform to bring sexual offences laws into compliance with international and domestic human rights standards. Reform of Discriminatory Sexual Offences Laws in the Commonwealth and Other Jurisdictions | Case Study of Belize Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Human Dignity Trust is very grateful to the law firm of Dechert LLP, a member of our legal panel, for supporting us with this research project entirely pro bono.
    [Show full text]