The Herpetological Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Herpetological Journal July Volume 9, Number 3 1999 ISSN 0268-0130 THE HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL Published by the Indexed in BRITISH HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY Current Contents HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL, Vol. 9, pp. 101-110 (1999) E VARIATION IN MANTIDACTYLUS MADECASSUS MILLOT & GUIR , 1950, A LITTLE KNOWN MALAGASY FROG, WITH RESURRECTION OF E MANTIDA CTYLUS PAULIANI G UIB , 1974 MIGUEL VENCES' AND FRANK GLA W2 1 Zoo/ogisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany 2 Zoo/ogische Staatssammlung, Miinchhausenstr. 21, D-81247 Miinchen, Germany Based on morphological diffe rences, specimens currently attributed to the Malagasy montane frogspec ies Mantidactylus madecassus can be divided into two distinct groups, which correspond to the geographically separated populations from the mountain massifs of Ankaratra and Andringitra. The Ankaratra populations differ from the Andringitra populations by the lack of distinctly bilobed subarticular tubercles on the fingers; more extended webbing between the toes; and a less contrasting dorsal colour pattern. Furthermore, they are distinguished morphometrically. The name Mantidactyluspauliani Guibe, 1974 is available for the Ankaratra specimens and is hereby resurrected. A lectotype of M. madecassus is designated. The two species share a lack of vomerine teeth and both possess a very short snout, and should be co nsidered as closely related allopatric sister taxa. So far as is known, they occur between 1500 and 2500 m altitude (mainly above 2000 m), in brooks and their tributaries in areas of ericoid vegetation or of ro ck formationswith rupicolous plant co mmunities. A short review of Malagasy montane amphibian species is provided, confirming that montane habitat in Madagascar harbours an important diversity of species specialized to high-altitudes. Key words: Anura, Ranidae, Mantellinae, Brygoomantis, montane herpetofauna, Madagascar INTRODUCTION (see Millot & Guibe, 1950; Blommers-Schlosser & Blanc, which was not collected in the survey of Madagascar contains a rich diversity of habitat 1991), Raxworthy Nussbaum ) , and thus not in­ types, mainly due to the variety of climates. The eastern & (1996b cluded in the list of montane amphibians from rainforest belt is separated from the western arid re­ Madagascar published by Raxworthy Nussbaum gions by a high plateau on which special montane & ecosystems are found. The three highest massifs are (1996a). M madecassus is a representative of the most Tsaratanana in the north (2876 m), and Ankaratra speciose and heterogeneous anuran genus in Madagas­ (2642 m) and Andringitra (2658 m) in central Mada­ car. According to the most recent descriptions (Vences gascar. The Malagasy montane herpetofauna is known Glaw Vences, Andreone from extensive collections, harboured mainly in the et al., 1997; & 1997; et al., 1998), the endemic genus Mantidactylus currently con­ Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN),Paris, tains described species classified into subgenera but basic information on the biology and ecology of 63 12 (Dubois, Glaw Vences, M most species is still lacking. 1992; & 1994). madecassus is included in the subgenus Brygoomantis Dubois, 1992 Recently, Raxworthy & Nussbaum (1996a) re­ (formerly group) which cur­ viewed the montane amphibian and reptile Mantidactylus ulcerosus rently consists of seven valid species communities of the Malagasy massifs of Andringitra, (Blommers-Schlosser Blanc, Glaw Vences, Ankaratra, and Tsaratanana, based on their own sur­ & 1991, & 1994). Brygoomantis are distinguished from repre­ veys. They found that a relatively large number of sentatives of other subgenera of by a species are restricted to the montane heathland, and re­ Mantidactylus derived karyotype (chromosome number = see jected the hypothesis that this habitat is artificial and 2n 24, Blommers-Schlosser & Blanc, 1991; not known in M faunistically depauperate. In another publication madecassus) and a combination of femoralgland struc­ (Raxworthy & Nussbaum, 1996b), the same authors ture (glands including a prominent rounded structure emphasized the similarities in the montane with ·external median depression, rudimentary glands herpetofauna between the Ankaratra and Andringitra present in females), sexual dimorphism in tympanum massifs. size (males having a larger tympanum than females), One frog species so farknown only fromhigh alti­ slightly distensible single subgular vocal sac in males, tudes of these two massifsis Mantidactylusma decassus slightly enlarged finger and toediscs, semiaquatic and partly diurnal habits, tadpoles with generalized mouthparts and distinct spiral-shaped intestine visible Correspondence: M. Vences, Zoologisches Forschungsinsti­ tut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, through ventral skin, and advertisement call structure D-53 113 Bonn, Germany. Email: [email protected] (series of pulsed calls with low intensity). 102 M. VENCES AND F. GLAW In the course of our ongoing revisions of the frog Morphometric data were processed statistically with genera of Madagascar, we examined the type material the softwarepackage SPSS forWindows, version 6. 1.2. of Mantidacty/us madecassus and of its junior synonym Samples were compared for representative ratios by M pau/iani. In the present paper, we give a detailed re­ non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-tests. Data were description of both taxa and revalidate M pauliani transformed logarithmically (log ) to render relation­ 10 based on several morphological and morphometric dif­ ships between them linear. A Principal Component ferences. We also provide an updated list of montane Analysis (PCA) was carried out using the log -trans­ 10 amphibians of Madagascar, and a comparison between formed data (three factors extracted). the herpetofaunas of Andringitra and Ankaratra. RESULTS MATERIALS AND METHODS VARIATION IN M. MADECASSUS The following morphological measurements were According to Blommers-Schlosser & Blanc (1991), taken with a calliper to the nearest 0.1 millimeter: SVL M madecassus is known from seven localities: Ankara­ (snout-vent length), HW (head width), HL (head tra, Nosiarivo, Ivangomena, Andohariana, Am­ length), ED (horizontal eye diameter), END (eye-nos­ balamarovandana, and Anjavidilava. The first two lo­ tril distance), NSD (nostril-snout tip distance), NND calities are located in the Ankaratra massif and refer to (nostril-nostril distance), TD (tympanum diameter), the type series of the taxon Mantidactylus pauliani HAL (hand length), FORL (forelimb length), HIL Guibe, 1974 (which was synonymized with M made­ (hindlimb length), FOL (foot length), FOTL (foot cassus by Blommers-SchlOsser & Blanc, 1991), and to length including tarsus). All available specimens of the several ZMA specimens previously also referred to M taxon pauliani were measured, whereas in M pauliani (see Blommers-Schlosser, 1979). All other lo­ madecassus specimens measured were selected accord­ calities are located in the Andringitra massif according ing to their state of fixation, in order to get a sample in a to the map in Blommers-Schlosser & Blanc (1991), comparable state to the pauliani specimens. All meas­ which did not include information on voucher speci­ urements were taken by the same person (MY). mens. We found MNHN.vouchers for all mentioned Institutional abbreviations are as listed in Leviton et al. sites except Ambalamarovandana. Several other locali­ (1985). Webbing formula follows Savage & Heyer ties are corroborated by MNHN specimens and by one (1967) as modified by Myers & Duellman (1982) and ZFMK specimen (Fig. I); all these sites are located Savage & Heyer (1997). To facilitate comparisons with close to each other within the Andringitramassif . other species of Mantidactylus, we also give the for­ Detailed examination and direct comparison of all mula used by Blommers-Schlosser (1979) and most available specimens demonstrated that they can be clas­ subsequent authors who have published accounts on sified into two distinct groups, corresponding to the Madagascan anurans. Andringitra and Ankaratra samples, respectively. Dif­ Femoral glands were examined and photographed ferences are (a) subarticular tubercles on fingers (very under a stereo-microscope. Our description refers to the prominent, mostly bilobed in Andringitra specimens; macroscopic appearance of the gland on the ventral fe­ but single and indistinct in those fromAnka ratra; Fig. mur. In a few specimens, we also carefullyremoved the 2); (b) webbing (more extended in Ankaratra, generally skin of the ventral femur and turned it upside down; by reaching the disc of the fifth toe); and ( d) colouration this procedure, the gland structures, which remain com­ (darker and more uniform in Ankaratra). pletely attached to the skin, could be examined in more Additionally, distinct morphometric differences be­ detail and could easily be distinguished from simple tween both samples were found. Measurements of all granular thigh patches as present in many frogs. available Ankaratra specimens and of a representative FIG. I. Mantidactylus madecassus (ZFMK 5741 6 from FIG. 2. Ventral side of hands of type specimens of M. Cuvette Boby, Andringitra) in life. madecassus (MNHN 1953.246; left) and M. pauliani (MNHN 1972. 1 508, right). Not to scale. Note difference in shape of subarticular tubercles. TABLE 1. Measurements (in mm) of adult specimens of Mantidactylusmadecassus and M. pauliani. See Materials and Methods section for abbreviations of characters. LT = lectotype, PL T = paralectotype, HT = holotype, PT = paratype. Status Sex SVL HW HL TD ED END NSD NND FORL FOTL HAL HIL FL M. madecassus MNHN 1953.246 LT F? 27.5 9.6 9.7 1.9 3.1 1.8 2.2 3.0 16.6 22.4 7.9 47.0 15.3 MNHN 1989.3591 PLT M? 25.4 8.0 8.6 1.6 2.2 1.7 1.8 3.0 12.7 21.3 6.2 36.1 12.0 MNHN 1989.3592 PLT F? 31.0 9.6 10.2 2.3 3.0 1.8 2.0 3.0 16.7 21.0 7.6 43.1 14.5 < MNHN 1989.3594 PLT F? 29.2 10.6 10.3 2.9 3.2 2.0 2.2 3.3 16.3 17.2 7.7 43.7 14.7 > MNHN 1972.1182 F 32.0 10.8 11.l 2.3 3.5 1.9 2.6 3.2 17.2 24.8 8.5 51.0 18.3 �> 10.9 11.0 2.2 3.3 2.1 2.7 3.1 17.1 25.2 8.7 50.5 17.7 ::l MNHN 1972.1185 F 32.4 0 MNHN 1972.1190 M? 27.0 9.2 9.9 1.7 3.1 2.0 2.2 2.8 15.3 21.1 7.0 42.4 14.2 z MNHN 1972.1192 F 33.7 10.9 11.2 2.6 3.5 2.0 2.5 3.4 18.0 25.1 8.4 49.6 16.7 z MNHN 1972.
Recommended publications
  • Zootaxa, Integrative Taxonomy of Malagasy Treefrogs
    Zootaxa 2383: 1–82 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2383 Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis FRANK GLAW1, 5, JÖRN KÖHLER2, IGNACIO DE LA RIVA3, DAVID R. VIEITES3 & MIGUEL VENCES4 1Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 München, Germany 2Department of Natural History, Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Friedensplatz 1, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany 3Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain 4Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Spielmannstr. 8, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by S. Castroviejo: 8 Dec. 2009; published: 26 Feb. 2010 Frank Glaw, Jörn Köhler, Ignacio De la Riva, David R. Vieites & Miguel Vences Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and com- parative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis (Zootaxa 2383) 82 pp.; 30 cm. 26 February 2010 ISBN 978-1-86977-485-1 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-486-8 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2010 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2010 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlates of Eye Colour and Pattern in Mantellid Frogs
    SALAMANDRA 49(1) 7–17 30Correlates April 2013 of eyeISSN colour 0036–3375 and pattern in mantellid frogs Correlates of eye colour and pattern in mantellid frogs Felix Amat 1, Katharina C. Wollenberg 2,3 & Miguel Vences 4 1) Àrea d‘Herpetologia, Museu de Granollers-Ciències Naturals, Francesc Macià 51, 08400 Granollers, Catalonia, Spain 2) Department of Biology, School of Science, Engineering and Mathematics, Bethune-Cookman University, 640 Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune Blvd., Daytona Beach, FL 32114, USA 3) Department of Biogeography, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, 54286 Trier, Germany 4) Zoological Institute, Division of Evolutionary Biology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Spielmannstr. 8, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany Corresponding author: Miguel Vences, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 18 March 2013 Abstract. With more than 250 species, the Mantellidae is the most species-rich family of frogs in Madagascar. These frogs are highly diversified in morphology, ecology and natural history. Based on a molecular phylogeny of 248 mantellids, we here examine the distribution of three characters reflecting the diversity of eye colouration and two characters of head colouration along the mantellid tree, and their correlation with the general ecology and habitat use of these frogs. We use Bayesian stochastic character mapping, character association tests and concentrated changes tests of correlated evolu- tion of these variables. We confirm previously formulated hypotheses of eye colour pattern being significantly correlated with ecology and habits, with three main character associations: many tree frogs of the genus Boophis have a bright col- oured iris, often with annular elements and a blue-coloured iris periphery (sclera); terrestrial leaf-litter dwellers have an iris horizontally divided into an upper light and lower dark part; and diurnal, terrestrial and aposematic Mantella frogs have a uniformly black iris.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Morphology and Development of the Malagasy Frog Mantidactylus Betsileanus
    SALAMANDRA 49(4) 186–200 30 December 2013Sarah ScheldISSN 0036–3375 et al. Larval morphology and development of the Malagasy frog Mantidactylus betsileanus Sarah Scheld 1,2,4, R. G. Bina Perl 1,2,3, Anna Rauhaus 1, Detlef Karbe 1, Karin van der Straeten 1, J. Susanne Hauswaldt 3, Roger Daniel Randrianiaina 3, Anna Gawor 1, Miguel Vences 3 & Thomas Ziegler 1,2 1) Cologne Zoo, Riehler Str. 173, 50735 Köln, Germany 2) Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Str. 47b, 50674 Köln, Germany 3) Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany 4) Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria Corresponding author: Thomas Ziegler, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 21 September 2013 Abstract. The Mantellidae is a species-rich family of neobatrachian frogs endemic to Madagascar and Mayotte. Although tadpoles have been described from many mantellids, detailed studies of their early embryonic development are rare. We provide a documentation of the developmental stages of Mantidactylus betsileanus, a common mantellid frog of Madagas- car’s eastern rainforests, based on clutches deposited and raised in captivity. Metamorphosis was completed after 89 days on average. External gills were not recognizable in the embryos, similar to three other, previously studied mantellids, which apparently constitutes a difference to the mantellid sister group, the Rhacophoridae. We also provide updated de- scriptions of the species’ larval morphology at stage 25 and stage 36, respectively, from captive bred and wild-caught indi- viduals, and report variations in the keratodont row formula from 0/2, 1/1, 1/3 to 1:1+1/3.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 05:28:58PM Via Free Access 62 S
    Contributions to Zoology, 74 (1/2) 61-76 (2005) The choice of external morphological characters and developmental stages for tadpole-based anuran taxonomy: a case study in Rana (Sylvirana) nigrovittata (Blyth, 1855) (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) S. Grosjean Département de Systématique et Evolution, UMS 602 Taxinomie et Collections - Reptiles et Amphibiens, Case 30, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Tadpole, Rana (Sylvirana) nigrovittata, Ranidae, external morphology, morphometry, internal buccal features, ontogeny, character variation, Vietnam Abstract Morphometry ............................................................................. 72 Conclusions ................................................................................ 73 The morphology of tadpoles has long received too little atten- Acknowledgements ........................................................................ 73 tion in taxonomic and phylogenetic contexts, beyond the use of References ........................................................................................ 73 Orton’s general tadpole types, despite the potential of larval Appendix .......................................................................................... 76 characters for resolving problems in systematics. A possible ex- planation for this neglect is the ontogenetic variation of external morphology. In order to understand the value of larval charac- Introduction ters in taxonomy and systematics, it is necessary
    [Show full text]
  • CO1 DNA Barcoding Amphibians: Take the Chance, Meet the Challenge
    Molecular Ecology Resources (2008) 8, 235–246 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01964.x DNABlackwell Publishing Ltd BARCODING CO1 DNA barcoding amphibians: take the chance, meet the challenge M. ALEX SMITH,* NIKOLAI A. POYARKOV JR† and PAUL D. N. HEBERT* *Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1, †Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119121, Russia Abstract Although a mitochondrial DNA barcode has been shown to be of great utility for species identification and discovery in an increasing number of diverse taxa, caution has been urged with its application to one of the most taxonomically diverse vertebrate groups — the amphibians. Here, we test three of the perceived shortcomings of a CO1 DNA barcode’s utility with a group of Holarctic amphibians: primer fit, sequence variability and overlapping intra- and interspecific variability. We found that although the CO1 DNA barcode priming regions were variable, we were able to reliably amplify a CO1 fragment from degenerate primers and primers with G-C residues at the 3′ end. Any overlap between intra- and inter- specific variation in our taxonomic sampling was due to introgressive hybridization (Bufo/ Anaxyrus), complex genetics (Ambystoma) or incomplete taxonomy (Triturus). Rates of hybridization and species discovery are not expected to be greater for amphibians than for other vertebrate groups, and thus problems with the utility of using a single mitochondrial gene for species identification will not be specific to amphibians. Therefore, we conclude that there is greater potential for a CO1 barcode’s use with amphibians than has been reported to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas
    Biodiversity Hotspots . Frank E. Zachos l Jan Christian Habel Editors Biodiversity Hotspots Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas - - Editors Dr. habil. Jan Christian Habel Dr. habil. Frank E. Zachos Muse´e National d´Histoire Naturelle Naturhistorisches Museum Wien Luxembourg Mammal Collection 25, rue Mu¨nster Burgring 7 2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-20991-8 e-ISBN 978-3-642-20992-5 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011936795 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover illustrations: Front cover: Coral reefs are among the most diverse habitats on the planet. The front cover photograph was taken by Jonas Thormar in the Red Sea and shows a bombora, or isolated piece of reef, near Eilat, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Systematics of the Peninsular Malaysian Ranidae (Amphibia: Anura)
    LARVAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE PENINSULAR MALAYSIAN RANIDAE (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) LEONG TZI MING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2005 LARVAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE PENINSULAR MALAYSIAN RANIDAE (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) LEONG TZI MING B.Sc. (Hons.) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2005 This is dedicated to my dad, mum and brothers. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to the many individuals and teams from various institutions who have contributed to the completion of this thesis in various avenues, of which encouragement was the most appreciated. They are, not in any order of preference, from the National University of Singapore (NUS): A/P Peter Ng, Tan Heok Hui, Kelvin K. P. Lim, Darren C. J. Yeo, Tan Swee Hee, Daisy Wowor, Lim Cheng Puay, Malcolm Soh, Greasi Simon, C. M. Yang, H. K. Lua, Wang Luan Keng, C. F. Lim, Yong Ann Nee; from the National Parks Board (Singapore): Lena Chan, Sharon Chan; from the Nature Society (Singapore): Subaraj Rajathurai, Andrew Tay, Vilma D’Rozario, Celine Low, David Teo, Rachel Teo, Sutari Supari, Leong Kwok Peng, Nick Baker, Tony O’Dempsey, Linda Chan; from the Wildlife Department (Malaysia): Lim Boo Liat, Sahir bin Othman; from the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM): Norsham Yaakob, Terry Ong, Gary Lim; from WWF (Malaysia): Jeet Sukumaran; from the Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia (EPU): Puan Munirah; from the University of Sarawak (UNIMAS): Indraneil Das; from the National Science Museum, Thailand: Jairujin Nabhitabhata, Tanya Chan-ard, Yodchaiy Chuaynkern; from the University of Kyoto: Masafumi Matsui; from the University of the Ryukyus: Hidetoshi Ota; from my Indonesian friends: Frank Bambang Yuwono, Ibu Mumpuni (MZB), Djoko Iskandar (ITB); from the Philippine National Museum (PNM): Arvin C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vences B131.Pdf
    andreone update:•5-12 Pessani 31-10-2008 17:08 Pagina 419 A Conservation Strategy for the Monografie del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali Amphibians of Madagascar di Torino, XLV (2008): pp. 419-438 Franco ANDREONE1, Neil A. COX2, Frank GLAW3, Jörn KÖHLER4, Nirhy H. C. RABIBISOA5, Herilala RANDRIAMAHAZO6, Harison RANDRIANASOLO5, Christopher J. RAXWORTHY7, Simon N. STUART2, Denis VALLAN8, Miguel VENCES9 Update of the Global Amphibian Assessment for Madagascar in light of species discoveries, nomenclature changes, and new field information ABSTRACT We updated the Global Amphibian Assessment for Malagasy amphibians, including considerations on the species described or resurrected between 2005-2007, and newly available information on other taxa. The revised assessment allowed us to include 66 threatened species: 6 Critically Endangered, 31 Endangered, and 29 Vulnerable. Three species formerly assessed as Critically Endangered (Mantella expectata, M. viridis, and Scaphiophryne gottlebei) are downlisted to Endangered, since they are more widespread than formerly presumed. Other recently described species have been assessed as threatened: seven are categorised as Endangered (Boophis tampoka, Gephyromantis azzurrae, G. runewsweeki, Mantidactylus noralottae, Tsingymantis antitra, Cophyla berara, and Plethodontohyla fonetana), and a single species (Boophis sambirano) categorised as Vulnerable. The little known and enigmatic Mantella manery, formerly assessed as Data Deficient, has been recently found on the Tsaratanana Massif. In view of this enlarged distribution and ongoing degradation of the habitats where it lives, it has been re-assessed as Vulnerable. Key words: Amphibians, Conservation, Global Amphibian Assessment, Madagascar, New assessment. 1 Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino. 2 Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Washington. 3 Zoologische Staatssammlung München.
    [Show full text]
  • From Specimens to the Tree-Of-Life: Tackling Tropical Arthropod Diversity
    FROM SPECIMENS TO THE TREE-OF-LIFE: TACKLING TROPICAL ARTHROPOD DIVERSITY DARREN YEO B.Sc. (Hons), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE AND DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON 2018 Supervisors: Professor Rudolf Meier, Main Supervisor Professor Alfried P. Vogler, Co-Supervisor Examiners: Assistant Professor Huang Danwei Dr. Thomas Bell Professor Dalton De Souza Amorim i Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. _____________________________ Darren Yeo 03 August 2018 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work ii Acknowledgements I am deeply grateful towards the following people, without whom this thesis would not have been possible: Prof. Rudolf Meier, who has had the central role in shaping my growth as a researcher, student and teacher. Thank you for always being supportive, conscientious and patient with me throughout my PhD studies. I am truly thankful to have a supervisor both passionate and well-versed in this field, who is able to spark and nurture my interest for entomology and molecular biology.
    [Show full text]
  • (DEA) Rofondies
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE ANIMALE DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE ANIMALE Latimeria chalumnae MEMOIRE POUR L’OBTENTION DU Diplôme d ’Etudes Approfondies (D.E.A.) Formation Doctorale : Sciences de la vie Option : Biologie, Ecologie et Conservation Animales ETUDE PHENOLOGIQUE D’ Anodonthyla montana Angel, 1925 et de Mantidactylus madecassus (Millot & Guibé, 1950) , AMPHIBIENS ENDEMIQUES DU HAUT MASSIF D’ANDRINGITRA Présenté par : Madame FALIARISOA Edwige Devant le JURY composé de : Président : Mada me Noromalala RASOAMAMPIONONA RAMINOSOA (Professeur) Rapporteur : Monsieu r. Achille Philipe RASELIMANANA (Maître de Conférences) Examinateur(s) : - Mada me Marie Jeanne RAHERILALAO (Maître de Conférences) - Mada me Jeanne RASAMY RAZANABOLANA (Maître de Conférences) Soutenu publiquement le : 29 avril 2011 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE ANIMALE DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE ANIMALE Latimeria chalumnae MEMOIRE POUR L’OBTENTION DU Diplôme d ’Etudes Approfondies (D.E.A.) Formation Doctorale : Sciences de la vie Option : Biologie, Ecologie et Conservation Animales ETUDE PHENOLOGIQUE D’ Anodonthyla montana Angel, 1925 et de Mantidactylus madecassus (Millot & Guibé, 1950) , AMPHIBIENS ENDEMIQUES DU HAUT MASSIF D’ANDRINGITRA Présenté par : Madame FALIARISOA Edwige Devant le JURY composé de : Président : Mada me Noromalala RASOAMAMPIONONA RAMINOSOA (Professeur) Rapporteur : Monsieu r. Achille Philipe RASELIMANANA (Maître de Conférences) Examinateur(s) : - Mada me Marie Jeanne RAHERILALAO
    [Show full text]
  • Haute Matsiatra)
    Zoosyst. Evol. 97 (2) 2021, 315–343 | DOI 10.3897/zse.97.63936 Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra) Francesco Belluardo1, Darwin Díaz Quirós1, Javier Lobón-Rovira1, Gonçalo M. Rosa2,3, Malalatiana Rasoazanany4, Franco Andreone5, Angelica Crottini1,6 1 CIBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, Campus de Vairão, 4485–661, Vairão, Portugal 2 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Outer Circle, Regent’s Park, NW1, 4RY, London, United Kingdom 3 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Edifício C2, 5° Piso, Sala 2.5.46, 1749–016, Lisboa, Portugal 4 Mention Zoologie et Biodiversité Animal, Domaine des Sciences et Technologies, Université d’Antananarivo, B.P. 906, 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar 5 Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Via G. Giolitti, 36, 10123, Torino, Italy 6 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua Campo Alegre, 4169–007, Porto, Portugal http://zoobank.org/5381781A-2801-4240-9ACE-F53CE3264B70 Corresponding author: Francesco Belluardo ([email protected]) Academic editor: Johannes Penner ♦ Received 3 February 2021 ♦ Accepted 20 May 2021 ♦ Published 1 July 2021 Abstract Madagascar has historically suffered from high fragmentation of forested habitats, often leading to biodiversity loss. Neverthless, forest fragments still retain high levels of biological diversity. The Haute Matsiatra Region (south-eastern Madagascar) hosts the renowned Andringitra National Park and several surrounding isolated forest fragments embedded in a matrix of human-dominated landscape. During a herpetological survey conducted in the Region, we visited a total of 25 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering Amphibian Diversity Through DNA Barcoding: Chances and Challenges Miguel Vences1,*, Meike Thomas2, Ronald M
    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (2005) 360, 1859–1868 doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1717 Published online 14 September 2005 Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges Miguel Vences1,*, Meike Thomas2, Ronald M. Bonett3 and David R. Vieites3 1Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, Mauritskade 61, 1092 AD Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2Department of Genetics, University of Cologne, Zu¨lpicher Strasse 47, 50674 Cologne, Germany 3Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA Amphibians globally are in decline, yet there is still a tremendous amount of unrecognized diversity, calling for an acceleration of taxonomic exploration. This process will be greatly facilitated by a DNA barcoding system; however, the mitochondrial population structure of many amphibian species presents numerous challenges to such a standardized, single locus, approach. Here we analyse intra- and interspecific patterns of mitochondrial variation in two distantly related groups of amphibians, mantellid frogs and salamanders, to determine the promise of DNA barcoding with cytochrome oxidase subunit I (cox1) sequences in this taxon. High intraspecific cox1 divergences of 7–14% were observed (18% in one case) within the whole set of amphibian sequences analysed. These high values are not caused by particularly high substitution rates of this gene but by generally deep mitochondrial divergences within and among amphibian species. Despite these high divergences, cox1 sequences were able to correctly identify species including disparate geographic variants. The main problems with cox1 barcoding of amphibians are (i) the high variability of priming sites that hinder the application of universal primers to all species and (ii) the observed distinct overlap of intraspecific and interspecific divergence values, which implies difficulties in the definition of threshold values to identify candidate species.
    [Show full text]