DOCSLIB.ORG

Thousands Crowd Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thousands Crowd Stations Vol. 4, No. II June 15, 1977 Thousands Crowd Stations ________-----, I To See Pioneer Inaugural Run Despite temperatures in the mid- tion of the route already has passen­ support a revival of railroad passen­ 90s, thousands of persons thronged ger train service. ger service because energy-short to Amtrak stations to watch the Riding aboard the special train America needs such mass transit." Pioneer, the new Seattle-Salt Lake were members of the press and state He also predicted, "There is des- City train, roll into their cities on its and local political and transportation inaugural run . officials. The press-public preview train trip Prominent among the political took three days, June 4-6, to permit figures were Senator Frank Church persons at all of the train's stops to and Governor John V. Evans, of climb aboard and inspect the new Idaho, who rode from Ontario to Amfleet equipment that has been as­ Pocatello; and Governor Scott M . signed to the run. Matheson, of Utah, who rode from Overnight layovers were made at Brigham City to Salt Lake C ity. All La Grande, Oregon, and Boise, greeted the crowds at the various sta­ Idaho. tion stops. Ceremonial stops were made at Senator Warren Magnuson, of Hood River, The Dalles, Hinkle, Washington, spoke at the official Pendleton, La Grande, Baker and dedication ceremony in Seattle. His Ontario, Oregon; Nampa, Boise, wife, Germaine, smashed the tradi­ Mountain Hom"" Shoshone and tiona! bottle of champagne over the Pocatello, Idaho; and Brigham City, rear car's coupler to officially Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah. christen the train. No stops were made between Said Magnuson to the Seattle Mrs. Magnuson christens the Pioneer with a Seattle and Portland since that sec- audience, "Congress will continue to bottle oj champagne. Amtrak President Paul Reistrup addresses the crowd at Boise, Idaho, on the second day oj the inaugural run. tined to be more and more travel on ranged from high school bands at chambers of commerce jointly spon­ the energy efficient trains." Pendleton, Nampa, Pocatello and sored a reception for Amtrak per­ Crowds jammed the station plat­ Brigham City to a three-piece western sonnel working the train. forms all along the route to hear the dance band at Hinkle to the Idaho 01' Also while in La Grande, the train speakers and listen to the band music. Time Fiddlers at Pocatello to a Senior was washed by members of the city's After each ceremony the cars were Citizens' band at Baker to the Union high school wrestling team. Since open for inspection by the public. Pacific Railroad band at Ogden. there were no contractors in the city Inside the cars, visitors viewed the Spirit along the route was one of that could do the job, the washing comfortable Amcoach seats, the food greeting a long lost friend. The route "contract" was offered the students. service center and samples of Amtrak lost its passenger trains, the Portland They accepted and did the job with meals. Rose and the City of Portland, in brushes and buckets. The money they Largest crowds were at Boise where May 1971. The route had not been earned will be spent on summer 3,500 persons walked through the one of the many chosen by the Secre­ camp. cars and at Pendleton where 3,000 tary of Transportation and the Am­ The inaugural train was picketed at came out to see the train. trak incorporators for passenger serv­ several stops by Greyhound per­ ice and hence lost its trains when Am­ sonnel. One of the pickets at Boise At a few locations crowds were so trak went into operation. large the train was delayed in leaving told a reporter that "We object to the The Pioneer, which began regular the city. Time, however, was made up federal subsidy to this train." service in both directions on June 7, is in each case and the train arrived "on Senator Church took note of that equipped with Amcoaches and an time" at each point. and told the crowd at one point, "I Amdinette. The special inaugural have nothing against the bus com­ Major spokesman for Amtrak at train consisted of two F40PH loco­ panies, but I don't think this train is ceremonies between Seattle and motives, two Amdinettes and four going to hurt them at all. Nampa was Harold Graham, vice Amcoaches. "But, when they complain about president for service planning. At Amtrak President Reistrup re­ the subsidy to Amtrak, they overlook Nampa, Amtrak President Paul vealed on the inaugural trip that a the fact that the biggest subsidy we Reistrup boarded the train and took sleeping car will be assigned to the payout today is the one the public over the official host duties. train later this year when cars - con­ puts in highways that the buses use Also riding aboard were Mrs. Mary verted from steam to electrical heat and the trucks use . Head, vice chairman of Amtrak's and thus compatible with Amfleet - "Let's not forget that!" Board of Directors, and Joe become available. The crowd responded with loud MacDonald, Board member. While the train overnighted at La applause. Music at the various stations Grande, the Baker and La Grande Church continued, "I believe we'll find that this rail transportation sup­ plements the buses, supplements the airplanes and brings Idaho back where we're part of the country again, served by a national rail pas­ senger system as the people of other states have been served." Did he personally like the train ride? Church told the crowds at every stop, "It's a modern, wonderful, comfortable train. It runs in all kinds of weather, in sunshine and in fog. It's a good ride for the price." He also noted, "I'd almost for­ gotten how nice it is to see the landscape, to see the communities, to have contact with the country you're riding through." On-board crew working the inaugural special included, left to right, Gary Erford, on-board At Nampa, before some 2,000 on­ inspector, San Francisco; Jim Wong, attendant; Willie Jenkins, employee in charge; Starla lookers, Governor Evans said, "It's a Berentsen, attendant; Donald Bryan, employee in charge; Charles Larrabee, attendant; Joe Broussard, regional instructor, Western region; and Jim Burton, manager, on-board services, great pleasure for me to welcome Seattle. Amtrak to Idaho. 2 He als~ suggested that Amtrak con­ in all United States cities, is squar, ly More sider, sometime in the future, a Salt up to the rail travelers. If enough I naugural Pictures Lake City-Los Angeles train. patronize the train, it will continue." Whether or not the train does be­ The Idaho State Journal, of Poca­ On Pages 4-5 come a permanent part of Amtrak's tello, told its readers, "We now have system depends on how well the peo­ assurance of at least two years of Am­ "As the train begins service, I want ple support it. The train is designated trak service. We hope it will be much to remind each Idahoan that it de­ as a two-year experimental route. At longe r than that." pends on his or her support. The need the end of that time, it will be I f the crowds that greeted the train' for passenger service for some of our examined and a decision made as to are an accurate indicator, its future areas is critical. whether it does or does not meet the bodes well. Said Rei strup at the end "For many, this train can and will route criteria standards. of the tou r, " It's the best inaugural tie the state of Idaho together and Editorials in papers along the route run I've seen." bring together friends and family. pointed this out to their readers. Trai n commander for the run was But for it to succeed, it must have Said .the Boi se Statesman, "Am­ Bruce Heard, manager, on board your support and patronage. I urge trak has accommodated Idaho. Now service. The on-board service crew all Idahoans to get into the habit of it's time for Idahoans to show it was consisted of Donald F. Bryan and riding the train again and to use it worth the trouble. The next trip, con­ Willie Jenkins, employees in charge; frequently in their travels." sider the train." and Starla Berentsen, James Wong Governor Matheson said he hoped Wrote the Ogden Standard and Charles Larrabee, on-board serv­ the new route would become a per­ Examiner, "The future of railroad ice attendants. All five are based in manent part of the Amtrak system. passenger service through Ogden, as Seattle. Convert Sleepers To Operate With Amfleet Cars At its May 26th meeting, Amtrak's ventional sleepers along with the Am­ program will be from a series of Board of Directors approved a $2.75 fleet on these trains so the trains have Budd-built stainless steel cars. Two million program to convert 25 con­ been operating, in the interim, cars had been converted earlier to test ventional sleeping cars to make them without sleeping cars. The new con­ the feasibility of such a project. compatible with the all-electric verted sleeping cars will alleviate the The entire fleet of 25 cars should be Amfleet cars. problem. available for use on the trains by the Work will consist of removing the Cars chosen for the conversion end of the year. steam heating system, the axle-driven generators and associated equipment and replace them with an all-electric Frayer Top April Salesman heat and air-conditioning system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Unseen Victim
    L OCOMOTIVE E NGINEERS & T RAINMEN JVolumeournal 120 | No. 1 | Winter 2016 WWW.BLE-T.ORG Chuck Akers steps down from the cab, reluctantly The unseen victim Education & Training An investment in our Also inside: union leaders of tomorrow PG 12 Last Runs The Real Brotherhood American Dream Obituaries BLET member Ray Vigil BLET Auxiliary is proud to be American, Scholarships proud to be Union PG 18 Published by the BLET, a division of the Rail Conference, International Brotherhood of Teamsters ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| BLET President’s Message BY D ENNIS R. P IERCE , BLET NAT IONA L P R E SIDE N T Join us in the fight to defend your hard earned benefits ne of any Union’s retirement benefits. We have primary respon- earned our retirement ben- sibilities is to ne- efits with our own sweat and gotiate for and tears; it is not some so-called Odefend the benefits that make entitlement that the govern- union jobs the best jobs in our ment should trifle with. proud country. It is no secret The same is true of our — as all members should be Medicare benefits. I entered well aware — that the rail- the work force in 1976, eleven roads are attempting in our years after the 1965 Medicare national contract negotiations Amendment to the Social to diminish the quality of our Security Act legislatively cre- health care benefits. In fact, ated the Medicare system. As the primary reason for our and in some cases take for benefit is our Railroad Re- a result, and as with almost national freight contract not granted, are a combination tirement program.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Pioneer Zephyr
    About the Pioneer Zephyr The Pioneer Zephyr is America’s first diesel-electric, streamlined, stainless-steel passenger train. It is located in the Museum’s Entry Hall and was renovated and conserved in 2020. History In an attempt to increase rail passenger traffic, the Burlington Zephyr was built for the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company (CB&Q) in 1934 by the Budd Company of Philadelphia. The Burlington Zephyr offered high-speed transportation in an elegant, streamlined, stainless steel design. It was the first diesel-electric passenger train to enter regular service. The train was renamed the “Pioneer Zephyr” in 1936 because it was the first of several diesel-powered Zephyrs built for the CB&Q. On May 26,1934, the Pioneer Zephyr left Denver and arrived in Chicago 13 hours and five minutes later to reopen the A Century of Progress World’s Fair in 1934. That single nonstop trip of 1,015 miles at record-breaking average speed of 77.6 mph changed the course of railroading and land transportation. Never before had a train traveled more than 775 miles without stopping for fuel and water. The Pioneer Zephyr, nicknamed the “Silver Streak,” was donated to the Museum of Science and Industry in 1960 and was displayed outside next to the 999 Empire State Express locomotive near the Columbia Basin. In 1997, the Museum hired Northern Rail Car of Milwaukee to restore the Pioneer Zephyr to it 1930s-era glory. The gleaming, refurbished train was then moved to a new, underground gallery at the Museum in 1998. The exhibit closed in October 2019, to make way for a completely new exhibition, opening in March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue of Play on October 4 & 5 at the "The 6 :,53"
    I the 'It, 980 6:53 OCTOBER !li AMTRAK... ... now serving BRYAN and LOVELAND ... returns to INDIA,NAPOLIS then turns em away Amtrak's LAKE SHORE LIMITED With appropriate "first trip" is now making regular stops inaugural festivities, Amtrak every day at BRYAN in north­ introduced daily operation of western Ohio. The westbound its new HOOSIER STATE on the train stops at 11:34am and 1st of October between IND­ the eastbound train stops at IANAPOLIS and CHICAGO. Sev­ 8:15pm. eral OARP members were on the Amtrak's SHENANDOAH inaugural trip, including Ray is now stopping daily at a Kline, Dave Marshall and Nick new station stop in suburban Noe. Complimentary champagne Cincinnati. The eastbound was served to all passengers SHENANDOAH stops at LOVELAND and Amtrak public affairs at 7:09pm and the westbound representatives passed out train stops at 8:15am. A m- Amtrak literature. One of trak began both new stops on the Amtrak reps was also pas­ Sunday, October 26th. Sev­ sing out OARP brochures! [We eral OARP members were on don't miss an opportunity!] hand at both stations as the Our members reported that the "first trains" rolled in. inaugural round trip was a OARP has supported both new good one, with on-time oper­ station stops and we are ation the whole way. Tracks glad they have finally come permit 70mph speeds much of about. Both communities are the way and the only rough supportive of their new Am­ track was noted near Chicago. trak service. How To Find Amtrak held another in its The Station Maps for both series of FAMILY DAYS with BRYAN qnd LOVELAND will be much equipment on public dis­ fopnd' inside this issue of play on October 4 & 5 at the "the 6 :,53".
    [Show full text]
  • May 22, 2017 Volume 37
    MAY 22, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 5 A Club in Transition 3 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 5 ■■■■■ MAY 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….4 Treasurer………………....Will Baker A Club in Transition….…..13 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Contests ................ ………..4 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Clinic……………..….…….7 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Editor’s Notes. ….…....… .13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘17) Form 19 Orders .... ………..4 Members .............. ….…....14 Memories ............. .………..5 Potpourri .............. ..……….7 ON THE COVER: The first 25% of our building was Running Extra .....
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Needs Assessment
    Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment draft report prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 31, 2014 www.camsys.com draft Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 date March 31, 2014 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment Table of Contents 4.0 Passenger Rail Needs Assessment ................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Existing Intercity Passenger Rail Service................................................. 4-1 4.2 Existing Passenger Rail System Performance ....................................... 4-10 4.3 Cascades Corridor Physical and Operational Needs .......................... 4-18 4.4 Other Potential Corridors ........................................................................ 4-22 4.5 Summary .................................................................................................... 4-29 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i 8053-084 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment List of Tables Table 4.1 Oregon Intercity Passenger Rail Stations .............................................. 4-2 Table 4.2 Intercity Passenger Rail Ridership to and from Oregon Stations as a Percent of Total Ridership, FY 2012 ............................................... 4-6 Table 4.3 Destinations of Amtrak Trips Originating at Oregon Stations as a Percent of
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Northwest Rail Working Group Columbia Gorge Commission 7/13/2021 Greater Northwest Working Group
    Greater Northwest Rail Working Group Columbia Gorge Commission 7/13/2021 Greater Northwest Working Group ● Overview • “Much of rural America is underserved by long-distance intercity passenger rail options, including portions of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The Greater Northwest Passenger Rail Working Group, modeled after the congressionally established Gulf Coast Working Group, will be convened by the Secretary of Transportation to study and develop service development plans for restoring the North Coast Hiawatha, Pioneer, and other routes within the Greater Northwest region as determined by the Working Group. The Working Group will also develop plans to implement the restoration of routes within the region that are funded by the 117th Congress. The ultimate goal of the Working Group is to further the economic and social wellbeing of rural America while providing enhanced connectivity for the national long-distance passenger rail system, thereby making the overall system more robust and resilient.” (People do live here….) US Interstate Highway System Our Region (one idea) New Approach, Partner Organizations ●All Aboard Washington ●All Aboard Minnesota ●Association of Oregon Rail and Transit Advocates, La Grande ●Big Sky Rail Authority ●COMPASS, City of Boise ●Utah Rail Passengers Association ●Rail Passengers Association ●Transportation for America ●Other People, organizations,businesses and localities. “You are here”….. ●There is no current established mechanism to realize the full intercity passenger rail system that is possible for the Greater Northwest Region; a state-level focus (siloed) is limiting, non-efficient, and will be less-competitive at the Federal level. ●This [Greater] Regional level is the best-positioned to coordinate, act- on, and realize the latent potential for passenger rail that is in our vibrant and diverse region; to the benefit of towns small and large.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Ed\Documents\NRHS 2017\1712 DEC RDG.Wpd
    1935 - 2017 VOLUME48NUMBER12 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG DECEMBER 2017 MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THE LANCASTER CHAPTER, INC. N.R.H.S. Lancaster Dispatcher Page 2 December 2017 Holiday Travel THE MUTUAL MAGAZINE - FEBRUARY, 1941 With holiday travel at the highest peak in many years, officers of the Pennsylvania Railroad estimated that during the period from December 13 to December 24, inclusive, the movement over all divisions of the system totalled approximately 2,500,000 passengers, an increase of nearly 20% above 1939. Of this number 2,000,000 rode in coaches and 500,000 in Pullman sleeping and parlor cars. The period covered embraced practically all of the Christmas trek “back home” for family reunions and the heavy travel to Florida, as well as soldiers visiting their people on furloughs from the various encampments throughout the country. In handling this Christmas traffic, 1,314 extra sections and special trains were operated, in addition to many extra cars on regularly scheduled trains. The heaviest day was December 20, when 202 extra sections were required. There were 1,621 extra runs of Pullman cars, including 1,230 sleeping and 391 parlor car movements. To accommodate the tremendous demand for reservations to Florida, 12 extra coach trains, handling more than 4,000 passengers, were operated on PRR WARTIME HOLIDAY POSTER - 1942 four days from New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore, via the Washington COLLECTION OF THE EDITOR gateway, to leading Florida points. These were in addition to the regular daily luxury coach trains - the Silver Meteor, the Champion and the Vacationer - as well as extremely heavy Pullman travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016
    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-17/02 National PB2018-100263 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-17/02 PB2018-100263 Notation 57150 Adopted November 14, 2017 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment, Chester, Pennsylvania, April 3, 2016. NTSB/RAR-17/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: On April 3, 2016, about 7:50 a.m. eastern daylight time, southbound Amtrak train 89 (train 89) struck a backhoe with a worker inside at milepost 15.7 near Chester, Pennsylvania. The train was authorized to operate on main track 3 (track 3) at the maximum authorized speed of 110 mph. Beginning on the morning of April 1, Amtrak had scheduled track-bed restoration―ballast vacuuming—at milepost 15.7 on track 2 on the Philadelphia to Washington Line. Track 2 had to be taken out of service between control points Baldwin (milepost 11.7) and Hook (milepost 16.8) for the 55 hour duration of the project. As train 89 approached milepost 15.7, the locomotive engineer saw equipment and workers on and near track 3 and initiated an emergency brake application. The train speed was 106 mph before the emergency brake application and 99 mph when it struck the backhoe. Two roadway workers were killed, and 39 other people were injured. Amtrak estimated property damages to be $2.5 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilltopper Vol. 1, No. 13 Hilltopper
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Hilltopper Newspapers 5-17-1935 Hilltopper Vol. 1, No. 13 Hilltopper Follow this and additional works at: http://encompass.eku.edu/hilltopper Recommended Citation Hilltopper, "Hilltopper Vol. 1, No. 13" (1935). Hilltopper. Paper 5. http://encompass.eku.edu/hilltopper/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Newspapers at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hilltopper by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Give We Trade Us A In Chance HILL TOPPER Richmond TRADE WITH THE ADVERTISERS IN THE HILL TOPPER — THEY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS Volume 1 Richmond, Kentucky, Friday, May 17th, 193g Number 13 Prominent Negro Lawyer-Minister We Salute Questions and Assaulted and Robbed at Corbin Answers About City Manager A band of white men, 'of MINISTER TO DELIVER Corbin, Ky. brutally assault• BACCALAUREATE SER• Note—A series of articles ed Rev. R. P. Pennington, MON; SECOND YEAR will appear in this paper who became famous because The news comes to us that each week on the City Man• a modern day miracle trans• the Rev. Monday of the St. ager Plan of Municipal Gov• pired in his life. Paul Methodist Church will ernment. At one time this minister deliver the baccalaureate ser• was deaf and dumb. A few mon Sunday at the high What is the Manager plan? years ago he said, "God has school gym at the request of It is at once the most opened up my ears and cutth e senior class and the head democratic and the most ef• loose my tongue.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees May 1998 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes GAO/RCED-98-151 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-279203 May 14, 1998 The Honorable Richard C. Shelby Chairman The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Frank R. Wolf Chairman The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Since it began operations in 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) has never been profitable and has received about $21 billion in federal subsidies for operating and capital expenses. In December 1994, at the direction of the administration, Amtrak established the goal of eliminating its need for federal operating subsidies by 2002. However, despite efforts to control expenses and improve efficiency, Amtrak has only reduced its annual net loss from $834 million in fiscal year 1994 to $762 million in fiscal year 1997, and it projects that its net loss will grow to $845 million this fiscal year.1 Amtrak remains heavily dependent on substantial federal operating and capital subsidies. Given Amtrak’s continued dependence on federal operating subsidies, the Conference Report to the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1998 directed us to examine the financial (1) performance of Amtrak’s current routes, (2) implications for Amtrak of multiyear capital requirements and declining federal operating subsidies, and (3) effect on Amtrak of reforms contained in the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997.
    [Show full text]