DOCSLIB.ORG

Do I Owe Israel Support of Nixon?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

killed not him alone, but much more. It killed a dream, morality. We helped by joining forces with destructive and woke me up to the horrible reality in which we hate-mongers, who talk about an Utopian world, but in Jews live. times of real need are incapable of human decency and feelings. We dreamt of a United Nations — about an^nlightened world opinion. Where were they when the Arabs seemed May the untimely death and sacrifice of our Israeli to be victorious? Only when the Arabs seemed beaten brethren be a warning to all of us before it is too late. did the United Nations awake and spread its protective umbrella to prevent Egypt from suffering the results of its aggression. Where, were all those great humanist Do i owe israel support of nixon? nations that were so concerned about Vietnam? Not a single one spoke out — all being more concerned with Jonathan Groner oil than with elementary human decency. How would the impeachment or resignation of the Where was the great McGovern, when his friend Fulbright President affect the future of Israel, and therefore, gave an anti-semitic speech worthy of a Goebbels? And how are we as Jews to respond to calls for either? where were all the great liberal columnists from the New York Times? Only William Safire found it appro- It is clear that if the removal of Richard Nixon would priate to express a word of encouragement. Had we directly endanger Israel's security — for example, if a been criminals, maybe a Tom Wicker or an Anthony Fulbright stood to succeed him — we would have to Lewis would have found time to shed a fake tear — but support Nixon and swallow our revulsion. Similarly, as we are only Jews, they had no time to interrupt, even if somehow Israel's survival were not bound up with for a minute, their vicious hate-campaigns. American arms and economic support, we could express our disgust at the present administration without com- Honor to those who cared punction. The truth is somewhere between these ex- We were alone in the world, just as in 1933, when tremes. Because of the inevitable instability that would Hitler persecuted us and the world stood by idly. But result from impeachment or resignation of the President, this time, thank G-d, not totally alone. One country — perhaps because of a potential White House reaction the United States — stood up for us, and a large number against outspoken Jewish opposition to the President of Congressional leaders supported President Nixon's continuing in office, there is some risk of disadvantage efforts on Israel's behalf. But these were not the people to Israel. Not certain destruction, I think it fair to say, the Jewish community had supported in recent years. but some disadvantage. The question thus becomes, These were names like Henry Jackson, Wilbur Mills, How much risk to Israel, if any, are we willing to accept James Buckley, Hubert Humphrey, Jerry Ford, Henry in order to express our outrage at what seem clearly to Kissinger and — above all — President Nixon. be immoral, criminal, and repressive men and acts? I don't know if he has broken any laws, or if all his When the question is phrased in this way, without the actions were precisely what they should have been. But usual rhetoric of "the very life or death of Israel and his unselfish, courageous stand showed him to possess the Jewish people," it can at least be dealt with. I care the quality of real greatness and moral leadership. He very deeply about Israel, but as a Jewish human being, proved himself to be far above his attackers. May G-d I also care very deeply about the survival of freedom give him strength. and the rule of law in America. These commitments We share the blame are both absolute and relative. They are absolute when Today I am sitting here thinking about what happened they are being radically tested: when Israel is actually since 1967. I can't help but feel that if the United in danger of destruction or when fascism is actually States were as strong today as in 1967, the Russians imminent here. They are both relative in lesser situa- would not be as brazen. I can't help but feel that the tions, and can then be balanced against each other. From btxllets that killed my student and his brothers were this non-absolutist viewpoint, there is an excellent case not just made in Russia, but that we all helped to forge that the potential risk to freedom and justice in America them. We forged them by joining the anti-military if we do not speak out against the President outweighs hysteria of recent years, forgetting that we are free a hypothetical disadvantage to Israel. A serious and people only due to our military strength. We helped committed Jew can take this position in good conscience, make those bullets by letting selfish isolationists con- while remaining constantly vigilant for a radical threat vince us that our cowardice is really a sign of a higher to Israel which would call for his absolute commitment. 11 In almost all other significant matters it is perfectly roof of my mouth, if I do not remember thee ..." respectable for a person to make distinctions and to Perhaps this poem is a prayer that should be recited respond in a measured way; but, for completely under- by American Jewish liberals. In it they will pray that standable reasons, many supporters of Israel react to if they ever forget Jerusalem, they will be silent, and j the present issue only in an absolute fashion. Is it too so not hurt their forgotten beloved. j much for them to understand that theirs is not the only possible Jewish position? I owe israel better than nixon Mark S. Golub I owe israel support of nixon Arlene Pianko A disturbing by-product of the current Israeli crisis has been the exposure of the political naivete and moral In a time when Israel is in danger of annihilation, every bankruptcy within American Jewry, revealed in the Jew must assess each of his acts to determine whether shiddach (match) much of the Jewish community has his behavior will be detrimental to Israel. Since the been willing to make with Richard Nixon. Although Holocaust we are duty bound to temper abstract moral the President has brought his administration to the judgements with the pragmatism of a survivor. In times precipice of total ruin, Jews have rallied to his defense of crisis, the realities of the situation must take prec- — indenturing themselves because he has continued to edence over messianic ideals. direct U.S. aid to Israel since the start of the Yom Kippur War. Even among Jewish liberals, it is deemed With the danger to Israel very real, Jews must dissociate "heresy" to dwell on the Watergate scandal and attend- between the corruption in Richard Nixon's administra- ant White House horrors; and in some Jewish circles, tion and his international policies. While every great it is an outright issur (a prohibition with the weight of power supported the Arabs, the President of the United Torah law) to suggest that the President resign or be States sent arms to Israel and stood up to the Russian impeached. For, so the argument runs, no matter how threat. The only world leader who, at present, is power- evil Nixon may be in domestic affairs, he's been "good ful enough to prevent the Russians from destroying to the Jews" in his Middle East policies. Israel is Richard Nixon. Israel only stands to lose by the impeachment of Richard Nixon at this time. No Yet when one looks objectively at Nixon's Middle East matter how great a friend to Israel his successor might posture, it becomes clear that neither pragmatic self- be, the interregnum would be a period of dangerous interest, nor Jewish idealism, warrants our support of instability. The Russian invasion of Czechoslovakia, the President. Not only has Mr. Nixon done no more like the Yom Kippur War, occurred during a period for Israel than any other President would have done when the President was very unpopular. The security under present circumstances, it is possible to argue of Israel is contingent upon the stability of the pres- that Israel has been seriously harmed as a result of idency of the United States. A weak America cannot Richard Nixon's occupation of the Oval Office. be a strong ally. When policies transcend personalities Last year I supported George McGovern because of my The most elementary law of international relations is disrespect for Nixon's amoral personal conduct and that foreign policy always transcends whoever happens my disapproval of his Vietnam policy. Survival, how- to be in office; it does not shift with each new President.' ever, must take precedence. Rabbi Akiba taught us A dramatic example of this fact was that the country's that if two people find themselves starving in the desert Viet Nam War position changed not one iota when the and there is enough water for only one of them to Kennedy-Johnson administration gave way to the Nixon 1 survive, the one who has it drinks, so that one, at least, administration. So it has been in the Middle East, where may live. After Yom Kippur, American Jews found American foreign policy has been consistently pro- themselves in this dilemma. One of their commitments Israel since the Truman administration. had to be sacrificed so that the other could survive; .
Recommended publications
  • Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access

    Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access

    690 American Archivist / Vol. 56 / Fall 1993 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/56/4/690/2748590/aarc_56_4_w213201818211541.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Question of Access SARA S. HODSON Abstract: The announcement by the Huntington Library in September 1991 of its decision to open for unrestricted research its photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls touched off a battle of wills between the library and the official team of scrolls editors, as well as a blitz of media publicity. The action was based on a commitment to the principle of intellectual freedom, but it must also be considered in light of the ethics of donor agreements and of access restrictions. The author relates the story of the events leading to the Huntington's move and its aftermath, and she analyzes the issues involved. About the author: Sara S. Hodson is curator of literary manuscripts at the Huntington Library. Her articles have appeared in Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship, Dictionary of Literary Biography Yearbook, and the Huntington Library Quarterly. This article is revised from a paper delivered before the Manuscripts Repositories Section meeting of the 1992 Society of American Archivists conference in Montreal. The author wishes to thank William A. Moffett for his encour- agement and his thoughtful and invaluable review of this article in its several revisions. Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls 691 ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1991, THE HUNTINGTON scrolls for historical scholarship lies in their LIBRARY set off a media bomb of cata- status as sources contemporary with the time clysmic proportions when it announced that they illuminate.
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty

    SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty

    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
  • Torturing Terrorists for National Security Imperatives: Mediated Violence on "24"

    Torturing Terrorists for National Security Imperatives: Mediated Violence on "24"

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-2009 Torturing terrorists for national security imperatives: Mediated violence on "24" Michael D. Sears University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Television Commons Repository Citation Sears, Michael D., "Torturing terrorists for national security imperatives: Mediated violence on "24"" (2009). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1183. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/2596826 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TORTURING TERRORISTS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY IMPERATIVES: MEDIATED VIOLENCE ON 24 by Michael D. Sears Bachelor of Arts New Mexico State University 2007 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Journalism and Media Studies Hank Greenspun School of Journalism and Media Studies Greenspun College of Urban Affairs Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2009 UMI Number: 1472488 Copyright 2009 by Sears, Michael D.
  • Social Meaning and School Vouchers

    Social Meaning and School Vouchers

    William & Mary Law Review Volume 42 (2000-2001) Issue 3 Institute of Bill of Rights Symposium: Article 9 Religion in the Public Square March 2001 Social Meaning and School Vouchers Neal Devins William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Education Law Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Repository Citation Neal Devins, Social Meaning and School Vouchers, 42 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 919 (2001), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol42/iss3/9 Copyright c 2001 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr SOCIAL MEANING AND SCHOOL VOUCHERS NEAL DEvINs* The more things change, the more they seem to stay the same: In 1981, I wrote a paper on the constitutionality of school vouchers for a law school course. At the time, it appeared that a sharply divided Supreme Court would reject vouchers, five to four. Two decades later, it appears that a sharply divided Supreme Court might well uphold vouchers, five to four. For this very reason, academics and others continue to fill the pages of law reviews with competing analyses of whether school vouchers violate the Establishment Clause.' Far more tellingly, during the 2000 elections, Court watchers claimed that the winner of the presidential race would control the constitutional fate of school vouchers (by, presumably, appointing the Justice who will cast the deciding vote in a constitutional challenge to school vouchers).2 * Goodrich Professor of Law and Lecturer in Public Policy, College of William & Mary.
  • Charles Hill Papers

    Charles Hill Papers

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt809nd82d Online items available Register of the Charles Hill papers Finding aid prepared by Grace Hawes Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2007 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Charles Hill 89004 1 papers Title: Charles Hill papers Date (inclusive): 1898-2006 Collection Number: 89004 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 157 manuscript boxes, 6 oversize boxes, 9 card file boxes, 1 cubic foot box, 2 envelopes(70.9 Linear Feet) Abstract: Collection includes correspondence, speeches and writings, dispatches, memoranda, reports, notes, printed matter, memorabilia, and photographs, relating to international relations and diplomacy, American foreign policy during the presidential administration of Ronald Reagan, and the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Also contains speeches and writings of Secretary of State George Shultz. Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org. Creator: Shultz, George Pratt, 1920- Creator: Hill, Charles, 1936- Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access "Boxes 39-51 closed. The remainder of the collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use." Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives between 1989 and 2011. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Charles Hill papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives Alternate Forms Available Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org.
  • The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense

    The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense

    The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense: Why Republicans Resurrected Reagan’s Dream Paul Musgrave Introduction National missile defense, even in its stripped-down, post-Reagan version, died in 1993. The Clinton administration killed it; shifting funding from research on “Star Wars”-like projects to missile defense systems like the Patriot. Instead of building a shield that would protect all of America, the United States would henceforth try to construct only limited defenses that could protect troops deployed in a future battleground. Yet ten years later, the George W. Bush administration has broken ground on new testing sites for a planned national missile defense, and billions of dollars annually are flowing into research and construction of a nationwide missile shield. The Bush administration could claim, were it so inclined, that it was merely following its predecessors; the basic parts of the Bush system are the same as those President Clinton proposed to use in his national missile defense. Why did U.S. policy toward missile defenses shift so dramatically? How did National Missile Defense survive its apparent death in 1993? These questions are important. National missile defense, in all of its guises and architectures, is among the most complex technical challenges humans have ever attempted to solve. It is also among the most costly, with some estimates placing the total cost of a missile defense system at nearly a trillion dollars. Understanding the sources of NMD’s resurrection is critical to a deeper comprehension of American security policy in the early years of the twenty-first century. The rebirth of missile defense came from two sources.
  • Syndicated Columnist Assignment

    Syndicated Columnist Assignment

    SYNDICATED COLUMNIST ASSIGNMENT This portion of the summer reading assignment provides students with a measure of choice, and is intended to allow them to spread the work over the course of a few weeks, although this assignment may also be completed in less time by using archived material. Students are to select two columnists from the list below and read a minimum of five columns by the same columnist, writing a rhetorical précis (pronounced “pray-see”) for each column using the guide provided. A brief biography of each columnist is provided (most are quoted or paraphrased from the corresponding newspaper site); students may wish to read one sample column from several writers listed below before settling on the two columnists who will be central to completing this assignment. A diverse selection of columnists has been provided; additional suggestions are welcomed. List of Syndicated Columnists Charles Blow Visual Op-Ed columnist who won first John Gould An American humorist, essayist, and New York Times two best in show awards from the Christian columnist who wrote a column for the Saturday Malofiej International Infographics Science Monitor Christian Science Monitor for over sixty Summit for work that included deceased; check years from a farm in Lisbon Falls, coverage of the Iraq war. archives Maine. He is known for his role as a mentor to novelist Stephen King. David Brooks He has been a senior editor at The Bob Herbert Prior to joining The New York Times, New York Times Weekly Standard, a contributing editor New York Times Mr. Herbert was a national Tuesday & Friday at Newsweek and the Atlantic Tuesday & correspondent for NBC from 1991 to Monthly, and he is currently a Saturday 1993, reporting regularly on “The commentator on “The Newshour with Today Show” and “NBC Nightly Jim Lehrer.” He is also a frequent News.” He had worked as a reporter analyst on NPR’s “All Things and editor at The Daily News from 1976 Considered” and the “Diane Rehm until 1985, when he became a columnist Show.” His articles have appeared in and member of its editorial board.
  • The Scanlan's Monthly Story (1970-1971)

    The Scanlan's Monthly Story (1970-1971)

    THE SCANLAN’S MONTHLY STORY (1970-1971): HOW ONE MAGAZINE INFURIATED A BANK, AN AIRLINE, UNIONS, PRINTING COMPANIES, CUSTOMS OFFICIALS, CANADIAN POLICE, VICE PRESIDENT AGNEW, AND PRESIDENT NIXON IN TEN MONTHS William Gillis November 2005 ii ©2005 William Gillis All Rights Reserved iii This thesis entitled THE SCANLAN’S MONTHLY STORY (1970-1971): HOW ONE MAGAZINE INFURIATED A BANK, AN AIRLINE, UNIONS, PRINTING COMPANIES, CUSTOMS OFFICIALS, CANADIAN POLICE, VICE PRESIDENT AGNEW, AND PRESIDENT NIXON IN TEN MONTHS BY WILLIAM GILLIS has been approved for the E.W. Scripps School of Journalism and the College of Communication by _________________________________________ Patrick Washburn Professor of Journalism _________________________________________ Greg Shepherd Interim Dean, College of Communication iv Acknowledgments Were it not for the guidance, encouragement, and good cheer of my advisor and thesis committee chair, Patrick Washburn, this thesis would not exist. Many thanks also to Joe Bernt, who like Pat took interest in the Scanlan’s project from the very beginning, and pointed me in interesting and fruitful directions; and Bill Reader, who provided good advice about where to take this project—and my life—after completing my degree. I must thank Tom Hodson; without his efforts on my behalf, I surely would have left Scripps for another program. I would also like to thank my friends and colleagues Andrew Huebner, Andy Smith, and Betsy Vereckey for taking interest in the project, editing the manuscript at various stages, and sharing ideas. Finally, a very special thank you to my parents. Their support—financial and otherwise—made this possible. v Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Off the Ramparts and to the Barricades……………………………………1 Chapter 2: Pay the Buck and Turn the Page………………………………………...18 Chapter 3: “You Trust Your Mother But You Cut the Cards”…………………….37 Chapter 4: The Magazine the President Hated So Much…………………………..58 Chapter 5: Guerilla Warfare in the U.S.A.
  • President Richard Nixon's Daily Diary, December 1-15, 1970

    President Richard Nixon's Daily Diary, December 1-15, 1970

    RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 12/4/1970 A Appendix “A” 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 12/4/1970 A Appendix “D” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 12/5/1970 A Appendix “A” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 12/6/1970 A Appendix “A” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-6 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary December 1, 1970 – December 15, 1970 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) ...... "".... ~I.. m\"nAKU NIXUrt·~ UAILY UIAKY (See Travel Record for Travel Activity) DECEMBER 1. 1970 THE WHITE HOUSE TIME DAY WASHINGTON D. C. 7: 45a TUESDAY PHONE TIME P=Placed R=Received ACTIVITY 10 Out Lo LO 7:45 The President had breakfast. 8:10 10:07 The President attended a. Republican Leadership meeting in the Cabinet Room.
  • AMERICAN FRANCOPHOBIA TAKES a NEW TURN Justin Vaïsse

    AMERICAN FRANCOPHOBIA TAKES a NEW TURN Justin Vaïsse

    03-Vaïsse 6/14/03 4:37 PM Page 17 AMERICAN FRANCOPHOBIA TAKES A NEW TURN Justin Vaïsse Center on the United States and France, Brookings Institution At the dawn of the 21st century, something new may be happening in the heartland of America: the spread of a negative image of France.1 Traditionally, a mostly positive image of France linked to its reputation for good food, high fashion, and sophisticated tourism, coexisted with a somewhat negative image in some elite circles. But the most important factor was definitely a lack of knowledge and the fact that above all, indifference reigned supreme. (See Body-Gendrot in this issue.) “Francophobia” (not a very satisfactory term2) does not constitute rational criticism of France. It expresses a systematic bias against this country, the way anti-Americanism does against the United States. It is based on a set of stereo- types, prejudices, insults, and ready-made judgments. Moreover, like anti- Americanism it deliberately conflates what a country is and what it does. Negative stereotypes about personal characteristics of the French, (for exam- ple, they are lazy, immoral, or arrogant) are combined with stereotypes about French society (elitist, unwilling to modernize, or anti-American) and stereo- types about French foreign policy (allegedly based on purely commercial inter- ests or nostalgia for past glory) to produce a complete, if sometimes self-contradictory, discourse of disparagement, what Jean-Philippe Mathy calls in this issue a “system of Francophobia,” a web of loosely related clichés that can be mobilized at will—especially, of course, when a diplomatic crisis erupts.
  • An Empirical Study of Subpoenas Received by the News Media

    An Empirical Study of Subpoenas Received by the News Media

    SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah Utah Law Digital Commons Utah Law Faculty Scholarship Utah Law Scholarship 2008 Avalanche or Undue Alarm? An Empirical Study of Subpoenas Received by the News Media RonNell Anderson Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/scholarship Part of the First Amendment Commons Article Avalanche or Undue Alarm? An Empirical Study of Subpoenas Received by the News Media RonNell Andersen Jones† In 2006, Mark Fainaru-Wada, a reporter for the San Fran- cisco Chronicle, sat down with his two young children to break some bad news: he likely would be spending the holidays in jail.1 He had refused to reveal the name of a confidential source when subpoenaed to do so, and a federal district court judge had found him in contempt and sentenced him to eighteen months in federal prison.2 Journalists across the country were outraged, but not wholly surprised.3 This, they said, was part of an alarming trend—an “avalanche” of recent cases in which members of the media had faced subpoenas seeking material they did not believe they should be compelled to provide. Across the country, a deputy attorney general was testify- ing in a congressional hearing.4 The avalanche, he said, was † Associate Professor of Law, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University. This article was funded by a research grant from the Uni- versity of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, where the author was a Distinguished Faculty Fellow from 2004 to 2007. The author thanks Universi- ty of Arizona Dean Toni Massaro and Associate Dean Kay Kavanagh for their support of the project; the law faculties at the University of Arizona and Brig- ham Young University for helpful comments in work-in-progress presenta- tions; Professors Kathie Barnes, Gordon Smith, and, especially, Lisa Grow Sun for excellent feedback and insights; and the following University of Arizo- na students for their legal research and assistance with the survey: Flynn Ca- rey, Megan Heald, Mary Hollingsworth, Susan Schwem, Rebecca Stahl, Holly Wells, and Tianlai Zhou.
  • The Flawed Case for Missile Defence 95 the Flawed Case

    The Flawed Case for Missile Defence 95 the Flawed Case

    The Flawed Case for Missile Defence 95 The Flawed Case for Missile Defence ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Steven E. Miller The Bush administration assumed office deeply committed to the deployment of missile defence and eager to modify substantially or even to abandon the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty to achieve that objective. To the new administration, this represents not simply a desirable long-term vision but an immediate policy priority. Every indication suggests that the administration wishes to move with dispatch to escape the constraints of the ABM Treaty. Indeed, some missile-defence enthusiasts hoped, if not expected, that the new administration would withdraw from the treaty almost immediately and there is already some concern and disappointment that it has not yet done so.1 Still, by July 2001, the administration had publicly stated its expectation that the United States will violate the treaty within months.2 Similarly, the adminis- tration appears determined to construct a first missile-defence site in Alaska as quickly as possible, perhaps initially conceived as a test facility rather than an operational site. The contract that would permit construction to begin has been drawn. The funds to make this possible have been requested. The work in Alaska should begin this year.3 The publicly articulated aspiration is to have initial interceptors in place by 2004. It seems clear that the Bush administration wishes to bequeath to the winner of the 2004 presidential election a world in which the ABM Treaty has been left behind and the initial missile-defence deployments have occurred. The Bush administration must pursue this agenda in a world full of uneasiness about US missile-defence plans.