DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Animals 1 01/2012 Aardwolf Anole Baboon African Elephant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Animals 1 01/2012 Aardwolf Anole Baboon African Elephant Land Animals 1 Aardwolf Anole Baboon African elephant Anteater Badger African wild dog Antelope Banded mongoose Alligator Armadillo Beaver Alligator turtle Asian elephant Bettongs Anaconda Aye-ayes Bighorn sheep ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 2 Bilby Bonobo Bushbaby Bison Box turtle Caiman Black bear Brown bear Camel Blackbuck Brown hyena Capybara Boa constrictor Brushtail possum Caribou Bobcat Buffalo Chameleon ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 3 Cheetah Cottonmouth Dingo Chimpanzee Cotton-topped Tamarin Dog Cobra Cougar Donkey Colugo Coyote Crocodile Copperhead Crocodile Duiker Coral snake Deer Echidna ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 4 Flying squirrel Gazelle Giraffes Forest hog Gecko Golden lion tamarin Fox Genet Gorilla Frill-necked lizard Giant panda Kiang Frog Iguanas Guenon Gavial Gibbon Hare ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 5 Hedgehog Jaguar Komodo dragon Hippopotamus Iguanas Kulan Horse Kangaroo Kiang Lemur Macaque Moose Impala Kinkajou Lion Jackal Koala Lizard ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 6 Llama Mink Ocelot Loris Monitor lizard Okapi Lynx Mountain goat Opposum Mandrill Musk deer Orangutan Marmoset Newt Otter Meerkat Nile monitor Pademelon ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 7 Peccary Polar bear Rattle snake Pika Python Red river hog Pit viper Rabbit Red panda Platypus Raccoon Reindeer Potoroos Raccoon dog Rhesus macaque Prairie dog Rat Rhinoceros ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 8 Salamander Snapping turtle Sugar glider Shrew Snow leopard Sun bear Skink Spiny anteater Tapir Skunk Spotted hyena Tarsier Sloth Squirrel Tasmanian devil Snake Striped whiptail Lizard Terrapin ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 9 Tiger Vicuna Worm lizard Tortoise Warthog Yellow mongoose Toad Wildebeest Zebra Tree shrew Wolf Zebu Tuatara Wolverine Turtle Wombat ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 10 aardwolf copperhead kulan polar bear warthog African elephant coral snake lemur potoroos wildebeest African wild dog cottonmouth lion prairie dog wolf alligator cotton-topped tamarin lizard python wolverine alligator turtle cougar llama rabbit wombat anaconda coyote horse raccoon worm lizard anole crocodile iguana raccoon dog yak anole deer impala rats yellow mongoose anteater dingo jackal rattle snake zebra antelope dog jaguar red panda zebu armadillo donkey kangaroo red river hog Asian elephant duiker kiang reindeer aye-ayes echidna kinkajou rhesus baboon flying squirrel koala rhino badger forest hog Komodo dragon salamander banded mongoose fox kulan shrew beaver frill-necked lizard lemur skink bettongs frog loris skunk bighorn sheep gavial lynx sloth bilby gazelle macaque snake bison gecko mandrill snapping turtle black bear genet marmoset snow leopard blackbuck giant panda meerkat spiny anteater boa constrictor gibbon mink spotted hyena bobcat giraffes monitor lizard squirrel bonobo golden lion tamarin moose striped whiptail lizard box turtle gorilla mountain goat sugar glider brown bear guenon musk deer sun bear brown hyena hare newt tapir brushtail possum hedgehog Nile monitor tarsier N American wild buffalo hippopotamus sheep Tasmanian devil bushbaby horse ocelot terrapin caiman iguana okapi tiger camel impala opposum toad capybara jackal orangutan tortoise caribou jaguar otter tree shrew chameleon kangaroo pademelon tuarara cheetah kiang peccary tuatara chimpanzee kinkajou pika turtle cobra koala pit viper vicunas colugo Komodo dragon platypus wallaby ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 Land Animals 11 Tips & Ideas 1. Cut and paste each animal on a world map where it naturally is found 2. Arrange animals in country groups 3. Cut out and classify all the animals 4. Paste/ arrange in classification table 5. Place animals on a classification tree 6. Make an animal mobile and hang the animals in groups 7. Find out the animal’s status – extinct, threatened, commonly found etc. 8. Play animal bingo with these cards and the animal word list References: http://www.sheppardsoftware.com/content/animals/kidscorner/classification/kc_classification _main.htm http://www.discoveryeducation.com/teachers/free-lesson-plans/animal-classification.cfm http://jabernethy.com/portfolio/AnimalClass4.htm http://www.zephyrus.co.uk/kingdomanimal.html http://www.softschools.com/science/living_things/animals/animals.jsp http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/index.html http://www.sheppardsoftware.com/content/animals/kidscorner/games/animalclassgame.htm (online game) http://sciencecentre.monash.edu/ptr/lessons/docs/biology/human/animal.pdf (printout) http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/scienceclips/ages/6_7/variation.shtml (online game) http://animals.pppst.com/classification.html (power point presentations and games) http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/classification/Mammalia.html#Ma mmalia (very advanced scientific classification) http://www.wartgames.com/themes/animals/classifications.html http://www.teachersdomain.org/resource/lsps07.sci.life.oate.animalclass/ (wonderful online game suitable for younger children) ©Nadene of http://practicalpages.wordpress.com 01/2012 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Roads and Hunting on Central African Rainforest Mammals
    Impacts of Roads and Hunting on Central African Rainforest Mammals WILLIAM F. LAURANCE,∗ BARBARA M. CROES,† LANDRY TCHIGNOUMBA,† SALLY A. LAHM,†‡ ALFONSO ALONSO,† MICHELLE E. LEE,† PATRICK CAMPBELL,† AND CLAUDE ONDZEANO† ∗Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panam´a, email [email protected] †Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20560–0705, U.S.A. ‡Institut de Recherche en Ecologie Tropicale, B.P. 180, Makokou, Gabon Abstract: Road expansion and associated increases in hunting pressure are a rapidly growing threat to African tropical wildlife. In the rainforests of southern Gabon, we compared abundances of larger (>1kg) mammal species at varying distances from forest roads and between hunted and unhunted treatments (com- paring a 130-km2 oil concession that was almost entirely protected from hunting with nearby areas outside the concession that had moderate hunting pressure). At each of 12 study sites that were evenly divided between hunted and unhunted areas, we established standardized 1-km transects at five distances (50, 300, 600, 900, and 1200 m) from an unpaved road, and then repeatedly surveyed mammals during the 2004 dry and wet seasons. Hunting had the greatest impact on duikers (Cephalophus spp.), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus), and red river hogs (Potamochoerus porcus), which declined in abundance outside the oil concession, and lesser effects on lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and carnivores. Roads depressed abundances of duikers, si- tatungas (Tragelaphus spekei gratus), and forest elephants (Loxondonta africana cyclotis), with avoidance of roads being stronger outside than inside the concession.
    [Show full text]
  • Helogale Parvula)
    Vocal Recruitment in Dwarf Mongooses (Helogale parvula) Janneke Rubow Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael I. Cherry Co-supervisor: Dr. Lynda L. Sharpe March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Janneke Rubow, March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Vocal communication is important in social vertebrates, particularly those for whom dense vegetation obscures visual signals. Vocal signals often convey secondary information to facilitate rapid and appropriate responses. This function is vital in long-distance communication. The long-distance recruitment vocalisations of dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula) provide an ideal opportunity to study informative cues in acoustic communication. This study examined the information conveyed by two recruitment calls given in snake encounter and isolation contexts, and whether dwarf mongooses are able to respond differently on the basis of these cues. Vocalisations were collected opportunistically from four wild groups of dwarf mongooses. The acoustic parameters of recruitment calls were then analysed for distinction between contexts within recruitment calls in general, distinction within isolation calls between groups, sexes and individuals, and the individuality of recruitment calls in comparison to dwarf mongoose contact calls.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yellow Mongoose Cynictis Penicillata in the Great Fish River Reserve (Eastern Cape, South Africa)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by South East Academic Libraries System (SEALS) Spatio-temporal ecology of the yellow mongoose Cynictis penicillata in the Great Fish River Reserve (Eastern Cape, South Africa) By Owen Akhona Mbatyoti A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE (ZOOLOGY) in the Faculty of Science and Agriculture at the University of Fort Hare August 2012 Supervisor: Dr Emmanuel Do Linh San DECLARATION 1. This is to declare that this dissertation entitled “Spatio-temporal ecology of the yellow mongoose Cynictis penicillata in the Great Fish River Reserve (Eastern Cape, South Africa)” is my own work and has not been previously submitted to another institute. 2. I know that plagiarism means taking and using the ideas, writings, work or inventions of another person as if they were one’s own. I know that plagiarism not only includes verbatim copying, but also extensive use of another person’s ideas without proper acknowledgement (which sometimes includes the use of quotation marks). I know that plagiarism covers this sort of material found in textual sources (e.g. books, journal articles and scientific reports) and from the Internet. 3. I acknowledge and understand that plagiarism is wrong. 4. I understand that my research must be accurately referenced. I have followed the academic rules and conventions concerning referencing, citation and the use of quotations. 5. I have not allowed, nor will I in the future allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as their own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Canid, Hye A, Aardwolf Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (Camp) Canid, Hyena, & Aardwolf
    CANID, HYE A, AARDWOLF CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (CAMP) CANID, HYENA, & AARDWOLF CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (CAMP) Final Draft Report Edited by Jack Grisham, Alan West, Onnie Byers and Ulysses Seal ~ Canid Specialist Group EARlliPROMSE FOSSIL RIM A fi>MlY Of CCNSERVA11QN FUNDS A Joint Endeavor of AAZPA IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group IUCN/SSC Hyaena Specialist Group IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group CBSG SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION The work of the Captive Breeding Specialist Group is made possible by gellerous colltributiolls from the following members of the CBSG Institutional Conservation Council: Conservators ($10,000 and above) Federation of Zoological Gardens of Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Claws 'n Paws Australasian Species Management Program Great Britain and Ireland BanhamZoo Darmstadt Zoo Chicago Zoological Society Fort Wayne Zoological Society Copenhagen Zoo Dreher Park Zoo Columbus Zoological Gardens Gladys Porter Zoo Cotswold Wildlife Park Fota Wildlife Park Denver Zoological Gardens Indianapolis Zoological Society Dutch Federation of Zoological Gardens Great Plains Zoo Fossil Rim Wildlife Center Japanese Association of Zoological Parks Erie Zoological Park Hancock House Publisher Friends of Zoo Atlanta and Aquariums Fota Wildlife Park Kew Royal Botanic Gardens Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust Givskud Zoo Miller Park Zoo International Union of Directors of Lincoln Park Zoo Granby Zoological Society Nagoya Aquarium Zoological Gardens The Living Desert Knoxville Zoo National Audubon Society-Research Metropolitan Toronto Zoo Marwell Zoological Park National Geographic Magazine Ranch Sanctuary Minnesota Zoological Garden Milwaukee County Zoo National Zoological Gardens National Aviary in Pittsburgh New York Zoological Society NOAHS Center of South Africa Parco Faunistico "La To:rbiera" Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo North of Chester Zoological Society Odense Zoo Potter Park Zoo Saint Louis Zoo Oklahoma City Zoo Orana Park Wildlife Trust Racine Zoological Society Sea World, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Mongoose Vocal Communication: Insights Into the Emergence of Linguistic Combinatoriality
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2017 Social Mongoose Vocal Communication: Insights into the Emergence of Linguistic Combinatoriality Collier, Katie Abstract: Duality of patterning, language’s ability to combine sounds on two levels, phonology and syntax, is considered one of human language’s defining features, yet relatively little is known about its origins. One way to investigate this is to take a comparative approach, contrasting combinatoriality in animal vocal communication systems with phonology and syntax in human language. In my the- sis, I took a comparative approach to the evolution of combinatoriality, carrying out both theoretical and empirical research. In the theoretical domain, I identified some prevalent misunderstandings in re- search on the emergence of combinatoriality that have propagated across disciplines. To address these misconceptions, I re-analysed existing examples of animal call combinations implementing insights from linguistics. Specifically, I showed that syntax-like combinations are more widespread in animal commu- nication than phonology-like sequences, which, combined with the absence of phonology in some human languages, suggested that syntax may have evolved before phonology. Building on this theoretical work, I empirically explored call combinations in two species of social mongooses. I first investigated social call combinations in meerkats (Suricata suricatta), demonstrating that call combinations represented a non-negligible component of the meerkat vocal communication system and could be used flexibly across various social contexts. Furthermore, I discussed a variety of mechanisms by which these combinations could be produced. Second, I considered call combinations in predation contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of Natural History
    p m r- r-' ME FYF-11 - - T r r.- 1. 4,6*. of the FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehr Volume 40, No. 1, pf 1-176 1997 == 46 1ms 34 i " 4 '· 0?1~ I. Al' Ai: *'%, R' I.' I / Em/-.Ail-%- .1/9" . -_____- UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY am published at irregular intervals Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. JOHN F. EISENBERG, EDITOR RICHARD FRANZ CO-EDIWR RHODA J. BRYANT, A£ANAGING EMOR Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publications and all manuscripts should be addressed to: Managing Editor. Bulletin; Florida Museum of Natural Histoty, University of Florida P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville FL 32611-7800; US.A This journal is printed on recycled paper. ISSN: 0071-6154 CODEN: BF 5BAS Publication date: October 1, 1997 Price: $ 10.00 Frontispiece: Female Florida panther #32 treed by hounds in a laurel oak at the site of her first capture on the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge in central Collier County, 3 February 1989. Photograph by David S. Maehr. THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehri ABSTRACT Comparisons of food habits, habitat use, and movements revealed a low probability for competitive interactions among bobcat (Lynx ndia). Florida panther (Puma concotor cooi 1 and black bear (Urns amencanus) in South Florida. All three species preferred upland forests but ©onsumed different foods and utilized the landscape in ways that resulted in ecological separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment
    PEST RISK ASSESSMENT Meerkat Suricata suricatta (Photo: Fir0002. Image from Wikimedia Commons under a GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2) March 2011 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Resource Management and Conservation Division Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment 2011 Information in this publication may be reproduced provided that any extracts are acknowledged. This publication should be cited as: DPIPWE (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: Meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of controlled animals pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. This pest risk assessment is prepared by DPIPWE for the use within the Department. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time. Pest Risk Assessment: Meerkat Suricata suricatta 2/22 1.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File Containing Table of Lengths and Thicknesses of Turtle Shells And
    Source Species Common name length (cm) thickness (cm) L t TURTLES AMNH 1 Sternotherus odoratus common musk turtle 2.30 0.089 AMNH 2 Clemmys muhlenbergi bug turtle 3.80 0.069 AMNH 3 Chersina angulata Angulate tortoise 3.90 0.050 AMNH 4 Testudo carbonera 6.97 0.130 AMNH 5 Sternotherus oderatus 6.99 0.160 AMNH 6 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 7 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 8 Homopus areolatus Common padloper 7.95 0.100 AMNH 9 Homopus signatus Speckled tortoise 7.98 0.231 AMNH 10 Kinosternon subrabum steinochneri Florida mud turtle 8.90 0.178 AMNH 11 Sternotherus oderatus Common musk turtle 8.98 0.290 AMNH 12 Chelydra serpentina Snapping turtle 8.98 0.076 AMNH 13 Sternotherus oderatus 9.00 0.168 AMNH 14 Hardella thurgi Crowned River Turtle 9.04 0.263 AMNH 15 Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle 9.09 0.231 AMNH 16 Kinosternon subrubrum The Eastern Mud Turtle 9.10 0.253 AMNH 17 Kinixys crosa hinged-back tortoise 9.34 0.160 AMNH 18 Peamobates oculifers 10.17 0.140 AMNH 19 Peammobates oculifera 10.27 0.140 AMNH 20 Kinixys spekii Speke's hinged tortoise 10.30 0.201 AMNH 21 Terrapene ornata ornate box turtle 10.30 0.406 AMNH 22 Terrapene ornata North American box turtle 10.76 0.257 AMNH 23 Geochelone radiata radiated tortoise (Madagascar) 10.80 0.155 AMNH 24 Malaclemys terrapin diamondback terrapin 11.40 0.295 AMNH 25 Malaclemys terrapin Diamondback terrapin 11.58 0.264 AMNH 26 Terrapene carolina eastern box turtle 11.80 0.259 AMNH 27 Chrysemys picta Painted turtle 12.21 0.267 AMNH 28 Chrysemys picta painted turtle 12.70 0.168 AMNH 29
    [Show full text]
  • Animals of Africa
    Silver 49 Bronze 26 Gold 59 Copper 17 Animals of Africa _______________________________________________Diamond 80 PYGMY ANTELOPES Klipspringer Common oribi Haggard oribi Gold 59 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Copper 17 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Gold 61 Copper 17 Diamond 80 Diamond 80 Steenbok 1 234 5 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Cape grysbok BIG CATS LECHWE, KOB, PUKU Sharpe grysbok African lion 1 2 2 2 Common lechwe Livingstone suni African leopard***** Kafue Flats lechwe East African suni African cheetah***** _______________________________________________ Red lechwe Royal antelope SMALL CATS & AFRICAN CIVET Black lechwe Bates pygmy antelope Serval Nile lechwe 1 1 2 2 4 _______________________________________________ Caracal 2 White-eared kob DIK-DIKS African wild cat Uganda kob Salt dik-dik African golden cat CentralAfrican kob Harar dik-dik 1 2 2 African civet _______________________________________________ Western kob (Buffon) Guenther dik-dik HYENAS Puku Kirk dik-dik Spotted hyena 1 1 1 _______________________________________________ Damara dik-dik REEDBUCKS & RHEBOK Brown hyena Phillips dik-dik Common reedbuck _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________African striped hyena Eastern bohor reedbuck BUSH DUIKERS THICK-SKINNED GAME Abyssinian bohor reedbuck Southern bush duiker _______________________________________________African elephant 1 1 1 Sudan bohor reedbuck Angolan bush duiker (closed) 1 122 2 Black rhinoceros** *** Nigerian
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Grazing on Aardwolves and How Farmers in Namibia Perceive the Aardwolf
    The effect of grazing on Aardwolves and how farmers in Namibia perceive the Aardwolf Jessica Fagerudd Arbetsgruppen för Tropisk Ekologi Minor Field Study 114 Committee of Tropical Ecology Uppsala University, Sweden September 2005 Uppsala The effect of grazing on Aardwolves and how farmers in Namibia perceive the Aardwolf Jessica Fagerudd Master Thesis in Zoo ecology, 20 p, Spring 2004 Department of Animal Ecology, Centre for Evolutionary Biology (EBC) Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Supervisors: Professor Mats Björklund and Doctor Jennifer Lalley Abstract The distribution of the aardwolf (Proteles cristatus) is entirely dependent on the presence of termites, on which it feeds almost exclusively. Farmlands that are grazed by livestock are often suitable habitats for termites and hence for the aardwolf. However, many farmlands are nowadays being intensely grazed and this, together with difficult climate conditions, can act as a threat against the biodiversity and the wildlife, including the aardwolf. To test if the grazing of livestock affects this animal, a comparison of the relative population density of aardwolves was made between an ungrazed reserve and a grazed farm in the semi-desert of Namibia. The study was performed between March and May 2004. The results imply that grazing at a medium level favours the aardwolf. It also seems as intense grazing negatively affects termites, and if that is the case, the aardwolf would be negatively affected as well. Another possible threat against the aardwolf is that it sometimes is being killed because of the misbelief that it attacks livestock. To get an idea of this problem a limited number of interviews were done with farmers in the northern part of Namibia.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Wildlife to Bush Thinning on the North Central Freehold Farmlands of Namibia T
    Forest Ecology and Management 473 (2020) 118330 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Response of wildlife to bush thinning on the north central freehold farmlands of Namibia T Matti T. Nghikembuaa,b,c, Laurie L. Markera,b, Bruce Brewera,b, Lauri Mehtätaloc, Mark Appiahc,d, ⁎ Ari Pappinenc, a Cheetah Conservation Fund, Otjiwarongo, Namibia b CCF Bush PTY Ltd, Otijwarongo, Namibia c University of Eastern Finland, School of Forest Sciences, Joensuu Campus, Yliopistokatu 7, 80101 Joensuu, Finland d Forestry Research Institute of Ghana (CSIR-FORIG), Kumasi, Ghana ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Agriculture is considered the backbone of the Namibian economy. However, bush encroachment affects ap- Bush encroachment proximately 45 million hectares of Namibian farmland and in the absence of appropriate restoration measures, Biodiversity negatively affects local biodiversity and the national economy. Bush thinning operations on three freehold farms Restoration were assessed to examine the response of local ungulates (small, medium, large) and predators (meso, large). Carrying capacity Camera traps were used to capture wildlife in bush encroached and previously thinned habitats. We hy- Overgrazing pothesized that thinning would increase the activity of small, medium, and large ungulates, meso and large Bush thinning predators, and that the magnitude of the increase in activity at thinned sites would differ among animal types. Our results revealed that the expected animal captures were not equal – small, medium, and large ungulates were common, large predators were least common; thinned areas had more expected animal captures and overall animal-treatment interactions were almost significant (p = 0.051).
    [Show full text]