Life and Events of Mirza Kamran
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Module-3 Formation of Mughal Empire Topic-Akbar
MODULE-3 FORMATION OF MUGHAL EMPIRE TOPIC-AKBAR PRIYANKA.E.K ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY LITTLE FLOWER COLLEGE, GURUVAYOOR Jalal-Ud-din Mohammad Akbar, son of Humayun was born at Amarkot (in Sind) on 15 October, 1542 in the house of a Rajput chief. Akbar spent his childhood under conditions of adversity and un-certainty as Humayun was in exile. Arrangements for his formal education were made by Humayun after his restoration to the throne of Kabul but Akbar was more interested in sports and martial exercises than in studies. In 1551 Akbar was made the governor of Ghazni and he remained its governor till November 1554 when Humayun embarked on an expedition for the conquest of Hindustan. Akbar was given nominal command of the army of Indian invasion and was given the credit of Humayun’s victory at Sirhind in January 1555. After his occupation of Delhi Humayun, declared Akbar to be the heir apparent and assigned to him the Governorship of the Punjab. Humayun died in January 1556 as a result of the fall from the staircase of his library. At that time Akbar was just a boy of 14. When the news of his father’s death reached, Akbar was at Kalanaur 15 miles west of Gurdaspur in Punjab. His guardian Bairam khan took immediate steps to enthrone him on brick-platform and performed the ceremony thereby proclaiming him the emperor on February 14, 1556 Challenges before Akbar Though Humayun had recovered Delhi in June 1555 he had not been able to consolidate his position in India therefore everything was in a chaos. -
Studies and Sources in Islamic Art and Architecture
STUDIES AND SOURCES IN ISLAMIC ART AND ARCHITECTURE SUPPLEMENTS TO MUQARNAS Sponsored by the Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. VOLUME IX PREFACING THE IMAGE THE WRITING OF ART HISTORY IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY IRAN BY DAVID J. ROXBURGH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 2001 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roxburgh, David J. Prefacing the image : the writing of art history in sixteenth-century Iran / David J. Roxburgh. p. cm. — (Studies and sources in Islamic art and architecture. Supplements to Muqarnas, ISSN 0921 0326 ; v. 9) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 9004113762 (alk. papier) 1. Art, Safavid—Historiography—Sources. 2. Art, Islamic—Iran– –Historiography—Sources. 3. Art criticism—Iran—History—Sources. I. Title. II. Series. N7283 .R69 2000 701’.18’095509024—dc21 00-062126 CIP Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Roxburgh, David J.: Prefacing the image : the writing of art history in sixteenth century Iran / by David J. Roxburgh. – Leiden; Boston; Köln : Brill, 2000 (Studies and sources in Islamic art and architectue; Vol 9) ISBN 90-04-11376-2 ISSN 0921-0326 ISBN 90 04 11376 2 © Copyright 2001 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA. -
Universi^ Micn^Lms
INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting througli an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. -
Consequences and Significance of Second Battle of Panipat
International Journal of Advanced Research and Development International Journal of Advanced Research and Development ISSN: 2455-4030 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.advancedjournal.com Volume 3; Issue 2; March 2018; Page No. 19-21 Consequences and significance of second battle of Panipat Karmvir Department of History, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India Abstract The Second Battle of Panipat was fought between the forces of Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya, popularly called Hemu, the Hindu king who was ruling North India from Delhi, and the army of Akbar, on November 5, 1556. It was a decisive victory for Akbar's generals Khan Zaman I and Bairam Khan. Background On January 24, 1556, the Mughal ruler Humanyun died in Delhi and was succeeded by his son, Akbarat Kalanaur, who was only thirteen years old. Keywords: Panipat, battle, war, second, causes, results etc. Introduction to free their nation, yet Bairam Khan ruled for war. Akbar's On February 14, 1556, Akbar was enthroned as the king. At armed force walked towards Delhi. On November 5, the two the time of his accession to the throne, the Mughal rule was armed forces met at the memorable combat zone of Panipat, confined to Kabul, Kandahar, parts of Delhi and Punjab. where, thirty years sooner, Akbar's granddad Babur had Akbar was then battling in Kabul with his watchman, Bairam crushed Ibrahim Lodi in what is presently known as the First Khan. Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya or Hemu was a Battle of Panipat. H.G.Keen expresses; "Akbar and his Hindu head in Delhi by ethicalness of vanquishing watchman Bairam Khan did not take an interest in the fight Akbar/Humanyun's armed force in Battle for Delhi. -
Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605
Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605 A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew de la Garza Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin, Advisor; Stephen Dale; Jennifer Siegel Copyright by Andrew de la Garza 2010 Abstract This doctoral dissertation, Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, examines the transformation of warfare in South Asia during the foundation and consolidation of the Mughal Empire. It emphasizes the practical specifics of how the Imperial army waged war and prepared for war—technology, tactics, operations, training and logistics. These are topics poorly covered in the existing Mughal historiography, which primarily addresses military affairs through their background and context— cultural, political and economic. I argue that events in India during this period in many ways paralleled the early stages of the ongoing “Military Revolution” in early modern Europe. The Mughals effectively combined the martial implements and practices of Europe, Central Asia and India into a model that was well suited for the unique demands and challenges of their setting. ii Dedication This document is dedicated to John Nira. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor John F. Guilmartin and the other members of my committee, Professors Stephen Dale and Jennifer Siegel, for their invaluable advice and assistance. I am also grateful to the many other colleagues, both faculty and graduate students, who helped me in so many ways during this long, challenging process. -
Akbar the Great Was the Son of Nasiruddin Humayun Whom He Succeeded As Ruler of the Mughal Empire from 1556 to 1605
AAkkbbaarr tthhee GGrreeaatt (1542 - 1605) Polymath INTRODUCTION Jalaluddin Muhammad Akbar also known as Akbar the Great was the son of Nasiruddin Humayun whom he succeeded as ruler of the Mughal Empire from 1556 to 1605. Akbar was a polymath: an architect, artisan, artist, armorer, blacksmith, carpenter, construction worker, emperor, engineer, general, inventor, animal trainer, lacemaker, ruler, technologist, theologian, and writer. EARLY LIFE Akbar was born on 15th October 1542, to Emperor Humayun and his recently wedded wife, Hamida Banu Begum. The Rajput Fortress of Umarkot in Sind, where Humayun and Hamida were taking refuge, became the birthplace of this great emperor. In 1540, Humayun was forced into exile by Afghan leader Sher Shah and Akbar spent his childhood in Afghanistan, at his uncle Askari's place. Humayun recaptured Delhi in the year 1555, with the help of his Persian ally Shah Tahmasp. However, a few months after his victory, he met with an accident and died. In 1556, Akbar succeeded the throne, in the midst of a war waged by Sikandar Shah for the Mughal throne. EARLY RULE The first battle fought by Akbar was against Sikandar Shah Suri of Punjab. Akbar the Great (1542 - 1605) Polymath However, when Akbar was busy leading assault against Sikandar Shah, Hemu, a Hindu warrior, launched an attack on Delhi, which was then under the regency of Tardi Beg Khan. Tardi fled from the city and Hemu claimed the capital. On the advice of his general, Bairam, Akbar launched an attack on Delhi and reclaimed the city. On 5th November 1556, he fought the Second Battle of Panipat against General Hemu. -
Introduction to the Prefaces 1
introduction to the prefaces 1 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION TO THE PREFACES A hundred regrets! M§lik, unique in his age, has departed this world. He was a calligrapher, a scholar, a darvÊsh following the right path. He was the Y§qåt of his age; the day when he left this world, Has become the chronogram of his death: “Y§qåt of the century—M§lik.”1 In this poetic chronogram in two couplets the Safavid calligrapher Malik’s achievements and personality are conveyed: he is compared to Yaqut, a thirteenth-century calligrapher who was regarded as the greatest master of the “six scripts” (aql§m al-sitta, shish qalam, khuãåã- i sitta), and the year of his death, 968 (1560–61),2 is conveyed by an artful combination of words, each letter of which is assigned a numerical value, their aggregate totaling 968. The source of the chronogram is unknown. It is recorded in Qazi Ahmad’s Gulist§n-i hunar (Rose Garden of Art, 1596–1606), in its comprehensiveness a behemoth of art historical-biographical writing. Qazi Ahmad’s Gulist§n-i hunar came at the end of a century of art history writing in Iran that had its origins in the late fifteenth century. From then onward, biographical notices of calligraphers, painters, and other practitioners of the arts were inserted into historical works. Biographies of poets mentioned that they were also skilled in calligraphy, depiction, illumination, and bookbinding, but as auxiliary competencies. Technical treatises (ris§la) composed by calligraphers sometimes contained passages that recorded aspects of art history in either prose or poetry. -
Humayun Badshah
HUMAYUN ON THE THRONE HUMAYUN BADSHAH BY S. K. BANERJI, M.A., PH.D. (LOND.) READER IN INDIAN HISTORY, LUCKNOW UNIVERSITY WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY SIR E. DENISON ROSS FORMERLY DIRECTOR, SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL STUDIES, LONDON HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1938 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AMEN HOUSE, LONDON, B.C. 4 EDINBURGH GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE CAPETOWN BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS HUMPHREY MILFORD PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY PRINTED IN INDIA AT THE MODERN ART PRESS, CALCUTTA INTRODUCTION It was with great pleasure that I accepted Dr S. K. Banerji's invitation to write a few words by way of intro1 duction to his Life of the Emperor Humayun, seeing that it was under my supervision, at the School of Oriental Studies, London, that he prepared his PH.D. thesis on the early years of Humayun 's reign. During the two years that he spent here I had ample opportunity of seeing his work and formed a high opinion of his capacity and enthusiasm. Since his return to India he has become Reader in Indian History at the Lucknow University, and he has devoted such leisure as his duties permitted him to the expansion of his thesis and a continuation of the life of Humayun, with a view to producing a full and definite history of that gifted but unfortunate monarch. The present volume brings the story down to the defeat of Humayun at the hands of Sher Shah in 1540 and his consequent abandonment of his Empire : the rest of the story will be told in a second volume which is under preparation. -
Suba of Delhi Under the Mughals 1580-1719
SUBA OF DELHI UNDER THE MUGHALS 1580-1719 ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE Ph. D. DEGREE By ABHA SINGH SUPERVISOR : PROFESSOR IRFAN HABIB CENTRE OF ADVANCED STUDY IN HISTORY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY 1988 ., ^N^ A2AD _ ABSTRACT ,^^r ^^^ ^^ ^ • % The thesis alms at studying varfoui?^ €!^9nondc; jiolitical and administrative aspects of the Mughal province of Delhi from 1580 to I7l9. Introduction gives the sources on which the thesis is based. All kinds of material, notably Persian historical works and records of ell kinds; Raj asthan! documents and accounts of European travellers have been used. The stud/ begins by establishing the limits of the euba, as well as of its divisions/ and the changes made in them from time to time, ^he physical geography of the area is then studied, with special reference to rainfall lines Cisohyets). An element of human geography alters by correlat ing Mughal administrative boundaries with the linguistic boundaries (after Griereon). An actual correspondence between administrative and linguistic boundaries has not however been established. (Chapter I). Chapter II deals with the pattern of Agricultural production in the suba. It has been found that the extent of cultivation increased greatly between the reigns of Akbar and Aurangzeb. Price variations are also been discussed. The price-data suggests that there wasaxise in the value of wheat between 1595 and 1715. - 2 - Data on mineral productions and manufactures (&3De brought together in Chapter III. This is followed by an analysis of the Land-revenue system in the guba. A comparison of dastur-rates, with Sher shah's rai* and modern yields has been attempted. -
Multiple Choice Questions (Mcqs) (For 3Rd Term) CLASS: VII SUBJECT: HISTORY & CIVICS ======Chapter – 10 (Akbar the Great)
1 vii H/C Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) (for 3rd Term) CLASS: VII SUBJECT: HISTORY & CIVICS ============================================================================================= Chapter – 10 (Akbar the Great) Question 1) Akbar was born to _______ in 1542 CE (a) Babar (b) Humayun (c) none of then Question 2) Humayun died in 1556 CE (a) True (b) False Question 3) _________ the nephew of Sher Shah Suri, felt that he had as much right to the throne of Delhi as Akbar had. (a) Adil Shah (b) Mubarak Shah (c) none of these Question 4) The Afghans had drive out the Mughal Governor ________ from Agra. (a) Tardi Beg (b) Sher Shah (c) Alamgir Question 5) Adil Shah’s army was led by ________ (a) Hemu (b) Sher Shah (c) none of them Question 6) The Afghan and Mughal forces met at the historic battlefield of _________ (a) Panipat (b) Tarain (c) none of them Question 7) The second battle of Panipat brought the establishment of ________ empire in India. (a) Mughal (b) Afghan (c) none of them Question 8) Bairam Khan remained in the position of Akbar’s regent till ________ CE (a) 1560 (b) 1500 (c) 1501 Question 9) Bairam was murdered in _________ by an Afghan. (a) Gujrat (b) Mumbai (c) Lucknow Question 10) _________ was Akbar’s foster mother (a) Maham Anga (b) Juberia (c) none of them Question 11) In 1561 Akbar defeated ________ the ruler of Malwa. (a) Baj Bahadur (b) Sher Shah (c) Mubarak Shah Question 12) In 1567 CE, Akbar defeated Rana Udai Singh of Mewar and captured the fort of Chittor. -
1468134454Humayuns Struggle with the Growing Powers of India.Pdf
SRJIS/BIMONTHLY/ KHALID BASHIR (169-187) HUMAYUN’S STRUGGLE WITH THE RISING POWERS OF NORTHERN INDIA. Khalid Bashir Research Scholar B.U Bhopal. Abstract This paper epitomises the struggle and the defeat of Humayun by the rising powers of India. The empire whose foundation was so arduously laid by Babur was nevertheless precarious and unstable in character. As soon as Humayun ascended the throne, he found himself surrounded by the difficulties on all sides in many ways. Babur had of course, defeated the Indian powers like the Rajputs, the Afghans etc., but he could not completely crush them. Babur could not do anything more than this short period of four years. In fact, the roots of Mughal dynasty had not yet gone deep into the Indian soil and were then, of course in firm. Muhammad Lodhi, Ibharim Lodhi‟s brother, had regained power in Bihar and eastern provinces after his defeat in the Battle of Gogra. Another Afghan Sardar Sher Khan had also consolidated his position considerably. Of the Afghan Sardars he was the most capable and intelligent leader, who was engaged day and night in consolidating and organising all the scattered Afghan power. On the other side, Bhadur Shah who was a very courageous and ambitious ruler had considerably improved strength, and was eagerly engaged in his effort to obtain the Delhi throne. The Rajputs too, had begun to reorganise their power after their defeats in the battles of Khanwa and Chanderi. According to Lanepoole, “His (Humayun‟s) name means fortunate and never was an unlucky sovereign so miscalled‟‟, As a matter of fact, the royal throne that he inherited from his father as his successor, was bed of throns and not that of roses. -
History of Azerbaijan in Miniature Painting
Arts Jamila HASANZADEH Doctor of Arts HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN IN MINIATURE PAINTING he history of the Azerbaijani Safavid state and its relationship with the Ottoman Empire has always attracted the attention of both domestic and T th foreign historians. The last third of the 16 century is inextricably linked with the war of these two empires. Along with the general fundamental works on the his- tory of these states, which reflect the history of Safav- id-Ottoman relations, there are also illustrations to the works of the chroniclers of the time. The desire of Shah Tahmasib I to establish peace- ful relations with the Ottoman Empire is eloquently attested to by diplomatic missions sent by the Safavid Shah to the court of the Sultan in 1568 and 1576 on the occasion of the accession to the throne of Sultan Selim II and Sultan Murat III respectively. Despite the fact that the Turkish side did not even send an official notification about the accession of Sultan Murat III to the throne, the Safavid court sent on this occasion a very impressive delegation both in composition and in the value of the presented gifts, among which a special place was occupied by more than 50 volumes of rare manuscripts, including a masterpiece in the art of the hand-written book - Shahnameh, which took 20 years to create. According to the materials of “Jawahir ul-akh- bar” by Budaq Munshi Qazvini, it is known that in re- sponse to the insistent requests of his beloved nephew Sultan Ibrahim Mirza to send something else instead of this book, Shah Tahmasib I stated that “peace and quiet are more important for him than a book, which he does not have to read.” “Qiran-us-Sadain”.