DOCSLIB.ORG

The Reign of King Cotton 1865–1895

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Reign of King Cotton 1865–1895 380-381_COTXSE_5_18_p 11/18/02 10:32 AM Page 380 The Reign of King Cotton 1865–1895 SECTION 1 Postwar Changes to Texas Farming SECTION 2 Railroads Lead to Commercial Farming SECTION 3 Cotton: The King of Texas Crops VIEW THE Texas on Tape CHAPTER 18 VIDEO LESSON. Away here in Texas the white cotton fields Look like plains covered over with snow, And corn in abundance at everywhere yields And oats most luxuriantly grow. Folk song “Away Here in Texas,” author unknown Clara McDonald Williamson, Chicken for Dinner 1865 1875 1885 1895 1865 Civil War ends; Texas 1876 Era of great railroad 1890 James Hogg is 1894 Boll weevil slaves are freed expansion begins elected governor infests Texas of Texas cotton crops 1872 Immigrants begin to arrive 1885 Robert Munger develops new in Texas to farm cotton cotton ginning process 380 ✯ Chapter 18 380-381_COTXSE_5_18_p 11/18/02 10:32 AM Page 381 Rev. Johnnie Swearingen, Cotton Picking Before You Read Can you think of agricultural products that you Think about use every day? Perhaps you are wearing a T-shirt • the different kinds of crops grown in Texas or blue jeans made from cotton. Or you may eat • how these crops reach local grocery stores Texas-grown fruits and vegetables. Many farms in Texas provide food and materials for making • products made from Texas-grown crops common items. • agriculture-based festivals and cultural events As You Read Organizing Information The Civil War left the Texas economy in ruins. Many Texans returned to farming to support themselves and their families. Thanks to a combination of events, many farmers eventually were able to buy enough land to grow food to sell to others as well as to feed their families. Completing this graphic organizer for Chapter 18 will help you to understand some of the GROWTH OF factors that led to the development of commer- FARMING cial agriculture in Texas. IN TEXAS • Copy the fishbone map in your Texas Notebook. • As you read, look for the causes that helped promote the growth of commercial agriculture in Texas. Write this information on the diagonal lines. • Write the supporting details for each of the three causes on the straight lines. The Reign of King Cotton ✯ 381 382-395TXSE_5_18_p 11/18/02 10:33 AM Page 382 Why It Matters Now Postwar Changes Traces of the economy and 1 society that developed after the Civil War can still be seen in to Texas Farming Texas today. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA bond, credit, 1. Analyze the economic effects of the After the Civil War, life in Texas commercial farming, Civil War on Texas. changed dramatically. Economic subsistence farming, barter, 2. Analyze the social effects of the Civil War problems led to a return to the tenant farming, sharecropper, on Texas. small family farm, and the freed landlord, mortgage, 3. Express and defend a point of view about slaves faced the problems of cycle of poverty postwar events in Texas. earning a living in conditions that were often unfair. WHAT Would You Do? Imagine that you are a slave on a Texas plantation. After years of Write your response dreaming of a better life, you suddenly are told that you are free. You to Interact with History now have the right to live wherever and however you wish, as long as in your Texas Notebook. you follow the laws of the land. What would be your plan of action? How would you make a living? Where would you live? How might these plans change if you had family members with you? Economic Conditions After the War Because most of the Civil War battles were fought in other states, Texas suffered little physical damage. But even though the land remained intact, the economy did not. The war left Texas and its people financially ruined. To begin with, many people’s entire savings were tied up in bond certificate issued by Confederate bonds. When the Confederacy was broken up, these pieces a government or company of paper became worthless. promising to pay back a Many businesses also fell into financial ruin. Before and during the borrowed sum with interest war, businesses had sold goods to the Confederate government on credit. credit an agreement in which Now these debts would never be paid. This was a fatal blow to many a buyer is allowed to pay over businesses that owed debts of their own. a period of time, usually with interest or fees added The Return of the Small Farm As more and more businesses failed, many men and women found themselves without jobs. For many, the only way to survive was to grow their own food. The small family farm was once again common in Texas. Although many Texans had farmed before the Civil War, little about farming life remained the same after the war. Soldiers returned home to find their farms in desperate need of repair. Plows, wagons, barns, and 382 ✯ Chapter 18 382-395TXSE_5_18_p 11/18/02 10:33 AM Page 383 ▲ The Civil War and the emancipation of slaves left Texans providing for themselves on a smaller scale. Some had to spin their own cotton to make clothing. ● How do you think subsistence farming affected theTexas economy? fences had to be repaired or replaced. To make matters worse, lines of commercial farming producing transportation were underdeveloped and inefficient. Building new roads, crops for sale railways, and shipping centers was made more costly and time-consum- subsistence farming producing ing by the economic conditions in postwar Texas and the state’s size. As almost all the goods needed by the a result, farmers often could not obtain the supplies they needed. farm family, usually with a little The lack of efficient transportation in Texas also made it difficult to extra for sale send crops to market. Without a low-cost way to ship these goods, Texans barter to trade one product or saw little reason to pursue commercial farming. Instead, most farmers service for another returned to subsistence farming after the war. That is, farmers generally tenant farming the practice of grew only enough food to meet their own family’s needs. renting the land on which one Most farm families grew corn and other grains and raised a few barn- lives and farms yard animals. Gardens provided fresh vegetables for the family table. Any extra eggs, milk, or vegetables were bartered or sold to neighbors or to merchants in town. This was a way for farm families to obtain goods and services that they could not produce themselves. The Rise of Tenant Farming To Mathematics Before a family could begin farming, it needed land. Unfortunately, few Texans owned land. Many lost their land because of financial diffi- Taking out a loan was risky for culties during and after the Civil War. Some plantation owners, however, poor tenant farmers. Often, lenders would charge an inter- had large amounts of land going to waste. These landowners divided their est rate of up to 150 percent. plantations into smaller sections that could be sold to farm families. If This meant the farmer had to the families could not afford to buy the land outright, they could rent it. pay back two and a half times The practice of renting land for farming is known as tenant farming—a as much as he or she had bor- way of life that Texans would maintain for decades to come. rowed. As a result, even a small The problem with tenant farming is that it seldom allows a tenant loan could put a family in debt for years. ● At an interest rate farmer to earn enough money to buy the land. Unlike purchase payments, of 150 percent, how much rental payments never end. Even after years of payments, a tenant farmer would a farmer owe on a loan is no closer to owning the land than when he or she started. Few families of $100? had the cash to pay for land, so tenant farming was a way to survive. It The Reign of King Cotton ✯ 383 382-395TXSE_5_18_p 11/18/02 10:33 AM Page 384 provided a family with land on which to live and grow the food they needed. As a result, the number of tenant farms in Texas increased from Overcoming about 38 percent of all farms in 1880 to about 50 percent in 1900. Illiteracy One thing that kept many Sharecropping families trapped in a cycle of A few farm families were able to pay their rent in cash. However, poverty was illiteracy, or the inability to read and write. many families were too poor for that. Instead, they paid with a share of Before the Civil War, slave the crop. These tenant farmers were known as sharecroppers. owners purposely kept African There were two main types of sharecroppers. Some owned their own Americans from learning to read. farming equipment and bought their own supplies, such as seed and As a result, most freed slaves fertilizer. These families owed the landlord only for the use of the land. were illiterate. This put them at Poorer renters started out with little more than their own labor and skills. a great disadvantage in matters of business and politics. The landowner furnished the farm equipment, seed, and other supplies, The Freedmen’s Bureau, as well as the land. These renters usually owed as much as half of their which operated in Texas for a crops to the landlord. Often the landlord would sell the crop and then few years following the Civil pay only a “wage” to the sharecropper.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Free Land Attracted Many Colonists to Texas in 1840S 3-29-92 “No Quitting Sense” We Claim Is Typically Texas
    “Between the Creeks” Gwen Pettit This is a compilation of weekly newspaper columns on local history written by Gwen Pettit during 1986-1992 for the Allen Leader and the Allen American in Allen, Texas. Most of these articles were initially written and published, then run again later with changes and additions made. I compiled these articles from the Allen American on microfilm at the Allen Public Library and from the Allen Leader newspapers provided by Mike Williams. Then, I typed them into the computer and indexed them in 2006-07. Lois Curtis and then Rick Mann, Managing Editor of the Allen American gave permission for them to be reprinted on April 30, 2007, [email protected]. Please, contact me to obtain a free copy on a CD. I have given a copy of this to the Allen Public Library, the Harrington Library in Plano, the McKinney Library, the Allen Independent School District and the Lovejoy School District. Tom Keener of the Allen Heritage Guild has better copies of all these photographs and is currently working on an Allen history book. Keener offices at the Allen Public Library. Gwen was a longtime Allen resident with an avid interest in this area’s history. Some of her sources were: Pioneering in North Texas by Capt. Roy and Helen Hall, The History of Collin County by Stambaugh & Stambaugh, The Brown Papers by George Pearis Brown, The Peters Colony of Texas by Seymour V. Conner, Collin County census & tax records and verbal history from local long-time residents of the county. She does not document all of her sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution and the Annexation of Texas
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2006 The onsC titution and the Annexation of Texas Earl M. Maltz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Maltz, Earl M., "The onC stitution and the Annexation of Texas" (2006). Constitutional Commentary. 290. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/290 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CONSTITUTION AND THE ANNEXATION OF TEXAS Earl M. Maltz* I. INTRODUCTION The annexation of Texas was by any standard a pivotal moment in the political history of the United States. The deci­ sion to add Texas to the Union was either directly or indirectly responsible for the acquisition of all of the territory of the United States south and west of the Louisiana Purchase. An­ nexation was also a critical issue in the presidential election of 1844 and the more general political struggle between Whigs and Democrats. Moreover, the dispute over Texas was a flashpoint in the evolving sectional conflict between the representatives of the free states and slave states.' The discussions of the issue in Congress had a dual aspect. Many of the arguments both for and against annexation were overtly phrased in terms of expediency. In addition, however, the debate over Texas had an important constitutional dimen­ sion, raising fundamental questions about the structure of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Volume Xvi - Number 1
    Leader page to JHSSC Fall 2010 Set your Acrobat Reader to View > Page Display > Two-Up T HE J EWISH H ISTORICAL S OCIETY o f S O U T H C AROLINA SPRING 2011 VOLUME XVI - NUMBER 1 Register for the Spring Conference “Jews, Slavery, and the Civil War” May 24 – 26, 2011 College of Charleston Pages 11 – 13 PAGE 2 JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SOUTH CAROLINA In this issue From the President of the JHSSC 3 Ann Meddin Hellman When Grant Expelled the Jews 4 Jonathan D. Sarna After alienating American Jews in 1862 with his infamous antisemitic General Orders No. 11, Ulysses S. Grant later earned their trust as a two-term president. Ann Meddin Hellman President Diplomacy’s Cruel Sword: Confederate Agents in Pursuit of Recognition 6 Theodore Rosengarten On the cover: Judah P. Benjamin and Edwin De Leon—both men of Sephardic ancestry raised in South Columbia, South Carolina, Carolina—became bitter rivals in the diplomatic struggle to win recognition for the surrenders to General Confederacy. William T. Sherman, February 17, 1865. Early “He Was Like One of Us”: The Judaization of Abraham Lincoln 8 Gary P. Zola the next morning, a fire Abraham Lincoln’s Jewish contemporaries viewed him as a friend and ally. With the passage breaks out and spreads, of time, his stature in the eyes of American Jews rose to that of a biblical patriarch. engulfing the town. The Burning of Columbia, Registration for Spring Conference: “Jews, Slavery, and the Civil War” 11 South Carolina (1865), Conference Schedule, College of Charleston, May 24–26, 2011 12 by William Waud for Harper’s Weekly.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Death of 'King Cotton' Led to Increased British Interest in India
    ENGL1101 Student: John Mays Instructor: Nathan Camp “Maharaj Cotton” How the Death of “King Cotton” Led to Increased British Interests in India In the 1830s, the Southeastern states were developing as a new economic power. The new growth was due to one crop — cotton. By 1860, nearly sixty percent of the total United States export was cotton. This cash crop pushed the young nation onto the world economic stage. In 1861, the nascent Confederacy was totally dependent on this “King” of the economy, and it played a major role in the Confederacy's downfall. As the American War Between the States dragged on and the Union blockade on Confederate ports remained in place, cotton exports decreased from a mighty river to a trickle. British textile mills, dependent on this supply, ground to a halt, and an alternative source of cotton had to be found. The eyes of a desperate Britain fell on India, and as “King Cotton” destroyed one country, it gave birth to another. Though the sphere of influence of cotton during the War Between the States is normally restricted to the United States, the deficit of southern cotton caused an increased British interest in the governing and development of India as a cotton producer. Prior to the invention of the cotton gin in 1794, large-scale production of long-staple cotton in the South was largely impractical. Long-staple cottons are known and named for their long fibers and high quality, and these varieties were desired by textile mills in Britain because they could be made into high-quality cloth.
    [Show full text]
  • King Cotton and Its Impact on Foreign Intervention in the War ❧ ❧ King Cotton
    King Cotton and its impact on foreign intervention in the War ❧ ❧ King Cotton ❧ The phrase was commonly used by Southern politicians and authors. ❧ Saying “king” cotton instead of just “cotton” showed the political and economic importance of cotton production. ❧ In 1793 the cotton gin was invented. ❧ After the invention, cotton exceeded tobacco as the dominant cash crop in the South. King Cotton ❧ This compromised more than half of the U.S. exports. ❧ Southerners argued the importance of cotton in the international marketplace ❧ They believed the industrial powers of Europe could not long afford to allow the northern navy to enforce its blockade. The importance of the Trent Affair of 1861 ❧ ❧ Trent Affair of 1861 ❧ The Trent Affair reflected the uneasy state of international relations created by the war. ❧ The Confederacy hoped that England or France, even both, would come to its aid. ❧ The Trent affair was settled through diplomatic evasion and maneuvering, but the international situation remained tense throughout the war. Trent Affair of 1861 ❧ Leaders of both the north and the south could imagine situations in which England or France would intervene with the weapons and supplies ❧ Foreign intervention loomed as an intense hope for the confederacy and a great fear of the north. ❧ Anger over the Trent Affair was balanced by resentment of southern assumptions about British dependence on cotton. Battle of Antietam ❧ ❧ Battle of Antietam ❧ September 17, 1862 ❧ The bloodiest single day of the Civil War ❧ Four times more soldiers killed and wounded than in the campaign’s other fights combined Approximate Numbers Union Confederate Total Killed 2,100 1,550 3,650 Wounded 9,550 7,750 17,300 Missing/Captured 750 1,020 1,770 Total 12,400 10,320 22,720 Battle of Antietam ❧ Most well-known of the battles in Lee’s first invasion of the North, has the most battlefield land preserved and attracts the most battlefield visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Facets of Texas Legal History
    SMU Law Review Volume 52 Issue 4 Article 9 1999 Facets of Texas Legal History Frances Spears Cloyd Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Frances Spears Cloyd, Facets of Texas Legal History, 52 SMU L. REV. 1653 (1999) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol52/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. FACETS OF TEXAS LEGAL HISTORY Frances Spears Cloyd* OR three hundred years Spain ruled vast areas in the Western hemisphere. She regarded these colonial possessions as being en- tirely the King's, for his use and benefit. She exploited them for royal profit through a tight trade monopoly and extended her laws into them. Her domination was approaching an end when the Anglo-Ameri- cans began to come into Texas. Moses Austin got permission from the Spanish government to take a colony into Texas in 1821. He died before he was able to complete his project and bequeathed the responsibility to his son, Stephen. In this same year Mexico and Spain were clashing. Iturbide led a pow- erful liberal movement based on unity of all classes, independence under a Bourbon prince with power limited by a constitution, and protection of the Catholic Church. Mexico proclaimed her independence from Spain and proceeded to the drafting of an extremely complex constitution.' It was completed and promulgated in 1824.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 11 the SOUTH, SLAVERY, and KING COTTON 1800-1860 Objective
    CHAPTER 11 THE SOUTH, SLAVERY, AND KING COTTON 1800-1860 Objective • This chapter explores how dependence on agriculture and slavery shaped the distinctive economy and culture of the old south. I-THE DISTINCTIVENESS OF THE OLD SOUTH What set the Old South apart are its regional climate, geography in shaping its culture and economy. Its warm and humid climate was ideal for cultivating profitable crops such as tobacco, cotton, rice, and sugar cane, which led to the plantation system of large commercial agriculture and its dependence upon slave labor. Unlike the North, the South had few large cities, few railroads, few factories, and few schools. I-1 A Biracial Culture The most distinctive feature of the south was its race-based slavery. The majority of southern Whites did not own slaves, but they supported what John C. Calhoun called the South’s “Peculiar Institution” because slavery was so central to their society’s way of life. The Old South also differed from other sections of the country in its high proportion of native-born Americans, both whites and blacks. I-2 Many Souths Three distinct sub-regions with quite different economic interests and diverging degrees of commitment to slavery. The seven states making up the lower south (south Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and, Texas) = intensive cotton production and slave labor. The middle southern states (Virginia, north Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas) had diversified agricultural economies including large area without slavery. In the upper or border south (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri) slavery was beginning to decline by 1860. II-The Cotton Kingdom II-1 King Cotton During the first half of the 19th century, cotton surpassed rice as the most profitable cash crop in the South.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port of New Orleans: an Economic History, 1821-1860. (Volumes I and Ii)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1985 The orP t of New Orleans: an Economic History, 1821-1860. (Volumes I and II) (Trade, Commerce, Slaves, Louisiana). Thomas E. Redard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Redard, Thomas E., "The orP t of New Orleans: an Economic History, 1821-1860. (Volumes I and II) (Trade, Commerce, Slaves, Louisiana)." (1985). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4151. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4151 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction Is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages In any manuscript may have Indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques Is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When It Is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to Indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to Indicate this.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention
    Best Integrated Writing Volume 3 Article 6 2016 Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention Shane Hapner Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/biw Part of the Business Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Hapner, S. (2016). Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention, Best Integrated Writing, 3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Best Integrated Writing by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact library- [email protected]. SHANE HAPNER HST 4650 Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention SHANE HAPNER HST 4650: Civil War, Spring 2015 Nominated by: Dr. Drew Swanson Shane is a senior majoring in History with a focus on early-modern European history. He tends to focus on diplomatic and political history. He states that this is his first paper “outside that aegis.” Shane notes: I’m not fond of American history, and from the start of this project, I consciously made every effort to tie in European perspectives to increase my interest. This required my topic to be economic; however, it is the first paper of that kind I’d written, and it necessitated a use of microfilm sources for the figures I required. This paper, therefore, represents a synthesis of political, economic, and diplomatic perspectives. Dr. Swanson notes: Mr. Hapner’s research paper examines the Confederacy’s efforts at cotton diplomacy in France and Britain during the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain and King Cotton: the Lancashire Cotton
    GREAT BRITAIN AND KING COTTON: THE LANCASHIRE COTTON FAMINE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR RYAN D KELL The Colorado College Department of History-Political Science Copyright © by Ryan D. Kell 2015 GREAT BRITAIN AND KING COTTON: THE LANCASHIRE COTTON FAMINE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by RYAN D KELL THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate School of The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of HISTORY-POLITICAL SCIENCE Department of History-Political Science THE COLORADO COLLEGE 2015 Acknowledgments I cannot express enough thanks to my thesis advisor, Lindsey Flewelling, Visiting Professor of History at Colorado College. Lindsey Was alWays Willing to help me With this project, Whether it Was With research or editing, while working a busy schedule of her own. I am extremely grateful for all the assistance she provided, and I could not have completed this task Without her. I would also like to thank David Hendrickson, Professor of Political Science at Colorado College. David helped me to polish my final product, making sure that I Was accurate and as persuasive With my argument as possible. My completion of this project Would not have been possible Without the help of my tWo academic advisors, Bryant “Tip” Ragan and Peter Blasenheim, both Professors of History at Colorado College. Tip, as my primary academic advisor, helped me navigate my four years of college and I Would not have been in position to graduate without him. Peter, my major advisor, has helped me to complete both my thesis and all my major requirements, always willing to give his honest opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12: the Lone Star Republic
    RepublicThe of Te x a s 1836–1845 Why It Matters As you study Unit 4, you will learn about Texas as a republic. After the creation of the United States from the original 13 colonies, other territories were granted statehood. Only Texas entered the union as a separate and independent nation. The distinctive nature of Texas owes much to its having been a republic before it was a state and to the influence of its settlers. Primary Sources Library See pages 690–691 for primary source readings to accompany Unit 4. Going Visiting by Friedrich Richard Petri (c. 1853) from the Texas Memorial Museum, Austin, Texas. Socializing with neighbors was an important part of community life during the years of the republic. Not all Texas settlers wore buckskin and moccasins as this well-dressed family shows. 264 “Times here are easy… money plenty, the people much better satisfied.” —Dr. Ashbel Smith, December 22, 1837 GEOGRAPHY&HISTORY RICH HERITAGE There are many reasons why people take the big step of leaving their homes and moving to an unknown land— and Texas, during the years 1820 to 1860, witnessed all of them. The newly arriving immigrant groups tended to set- tle in one particular area, since it was easier to work with and live around people who spoke the same language and practiced the same customs. Many Mexicans came north while Texas was still a Spanish territory to set up farms on the fertile Coastal Plains. As A traditional band plays lively German the United States grew, more Native Americans, who had music at the Texas Folklife Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • King Charles to King Cotton South Carolina 1670-1860
    King Charles to King Cotton South Carolina 1670-1860 Explore where it happened… King Charles to King Cotton is an educational field program hosted by three historic museum properties located within Charleston, SC. Designed for South Carolina Public Schools Grades 3rd & 8th Have questions? Call (843)724-8491 or visit www.HistoricCharleston.org Table of Contents Program Overview……………………………………….………………..…......2 Museums & Program Standards……….…………………………………..…….3 Scheduling, Rates, & Logistics………………….……………………………....6 Area Map (Arrival/Departure/Parking)……….................…………………………..….8 Program Overview Dear Educators, King Charles to King Cotton: South Carolina 1670-1860 is a South Carolina 3rd and 8th Grade program designed by educators affiliated with the following museum properties: The Powder Magazine - South Carolina’s Oldest Public Building, c. 1713 Historic Charleston Foundation’s Nathaniel Russell House Museum, c. 1808 Old Slave Mart Museum- Part of South Carolina’s Inter-State Slave Trade, c. 1856 The purpose of King Charles to King Cotton is to immerse students in South Carolina history by visiting three authentic properties located in historic Charleston. Program content includes the political, economic, and social transformations that shaped South Carolina between 1670 and 1860. Students will gain historic perspectives by walking in the footsteps of those who lived through the state’s Colonial, Revolutionary, and Antebellum periods. Participating museums are interconnected as a tangible timeline revealing South Carolina’s evolving political and economic history. Students will review how the institution of slavery served as a foundation for South Carolina throughout these transformative years. Thank you for considering this program for your students. We are confident that after experiencing King Charles to King Cotton, you will agree this field experience is the perfect method to either preview or reinforce what is being learned in your classroom.
    [Show full text]