DOCSLIB.ORG

King Cotton and Its Impact on Foreign Intervention in the War ❧ ❧ King Cotton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King Cotton and Its Impact on Foreign Intervention in the War ❧ ❧ King Cotton King Cotton and its impact on foreign intervention in the War ❧ ❧ King Cotton ❧ The phrase was commonly used by Southern politicians and authors. ❧ Saying “king” cotton instead of just “cotton” showed the political and economic importance of cotton production. ❧ In 1793 the cotton gin was invented. ❧ After the invention, cotton exceeded tobacco as the dominant cash crop in the South. King Cotton ❧ This compromised more than half of the U.S. exports. ❧ Southerners argued the importance of cotton in the international marketplace ❧ They believed the industrial powers of Europe could not long afford to allow the northern navy to enforce its blockade. The importance of the Trent Affair of 1861 ❧ ❧ Trent Affair of 1861 ❧ The Trent Affair reflected the uneasy state of international relations created by the war. ❧ The Confederacy hoped that England or France, even both, would come to its aid. ❧ The Trent affair was settled through diplomatic evasion and maneuvering, but the international situation remained tense throughout the war. Trent Affair of 1861 ❧ Leaders of both the north and the south could imagine situations in which England or France would intervene with the weapons and supplies ❧ Foreign intervention loomed as an intense hope for the confederacy and a great fear of the north. ❧ Anger over the Trent Affair was balanced by resentment of southern assumptions about British dependence on cotton. Battle of Antietam ❧ ❧ Battle of Antietam ❧ September 17, 1862 ❧ The bloodiest single day of the Civil War ❧ Four times more soldiers killed and wounded than in the campaign’s other fights combined Approximate Numbers Union Confederate Total Killed 2,100 1,550 3,650 Wounded 9,550 7,750 17,300 Missing/Captured 750 1,020 1,770 Total 12,400 10,320 22,720 Battle of Antietam ❧ Most well-known of the battles in Lee’s first invasion of the North, has the most battlefield land preserved and attracts the most battlefield visitors. ❧ After Antietam, Lee’s return to Virginia, and the issuing of the Emancipation Proclamation, Europe’s will to be involved was went so low to the point where they barely existed ❧ This meant that the Confederacy was completely on its own Emancipation Proclamation “Thus ended the South’s best chance for ❧ Origin: Cycle of Adams letters European intervention. It did not end October 17, 1862 irrevocably, for the military situation ❧ Purpose: to write about what remained fluid and most Britons remained certain that the North could never win. success the North had over the But at least they had avoided losing. South. Antietam had, in Charles Francis Adam’s ❧ Value: it is a valid piece of understatement,’done a good deal to writing because it is written the restore our drooping credit here.’ It had same day the battle occurred. done more; by enabling Lincoln to issue ❧ Limitation: it is biased towards the Emancipation Proclamation the battle the South because it only talks also ensured that Britain would think twice about the South losing and what about intervening against a government.” the North had attained as well as the North’s goal. Two Factors that kept Europe from recognizing the South ❧ ❧ Factors that kept Europe from recognizing the South: 1 ❧ The Union created a blockade of Confederate ports which prevented the export of cotton and the smuggling of war materiel ❧ After the U.S. announces its intention of establishing an official blockade of Confederate ports, foreign governments began to recognize the Confederacy as a belligerent in the Civil War. Great Britain granted belligerent status on May 13, 1861, Spain on June 17, and Brazil on August 1. Other foreign governments issued statements of neutrality. Factors that kept Europe from recognizing the South: 1 ❧ As the war progressed and more territory came under Union control, the blockade became more effective, but less of an international issue. ❧ However, until the capture of Fort Fisher in 1865, the Confederate Army was still able to obtain some supplies via blockade running ships. Factors that kept Europe from recognizing the South:2 ❧ The South was an aristocracy, and the fact that it had a broad democratic base was easily overlooked by the European’s at a distance of three thousand miles. ❧ Southern nation was based on the institution of chattel slavery-a completely repugnant anachronism by the middle of the nineteenth century. ❧ Neither the British nor the French people would go along with any policy that involved fighting to preserve slavery. Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan for Reconstruction ❧ ❧ Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan for Reconstruction ❧ Lincoln's Ten Percent Plan was an attempt to reunite the southern states after Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg. ❧ He issued the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction because he believed the south had never truly seceded and that Reconstruction should be based off forgiveness. It was meant to rally the union and persuade confederate soldiers, tired from fighting, to surrender. Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan for Reconstruction ❧ Thus, the Ten Percent Plan, which stated that if ten percent of a state’s voters swore an Oath of Allegiance, the state could be readmitted to the Union. ❧ All southerners excluding high-ranking Confederate army officers and government officials would be given a full pardon. ❧ Most supported Lincolns plan because it would help to bring a quick end to the war. The plan was largely a political tactic because it was feared if the war continued on for any longer that the south and north could easily never be reunited Radical Republicans Opposing Lincoln’s Plan ❧ ❧ Radical Republicans Opposing Lincoln’s Plan ❧ The radical republicans believed that the Reconstruction plan wasn’t harsh enough and that it needed to punish the south for causing the war. ❧ They ended up passing the Wade-Davis bill in return to the ten percent plan. This bill was stating that fifty percent would have to swear an “ironclad” oath in order to be readmitted. ❧ Lincoln pocket-vetoed the bill because he feared fifty percent would ruin chances of ending war quickly. References: ❧ Council on Foreign Relations. Council on Foreign Relations, n.d. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. ❧ United States. National Park Service. "Casualties of Battle." National Parks Service. U.S. Department of the Interior, 13 Sept. 2014. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. ❧ "The Blockade of Confederate Ports, 1861–1865 - 1861–1865 - Milestones - Office of the Historian." The Blockade of Confederate Ports, 1861–1865 - 1861–1865 - Milestones - Office of the Historian. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2014. ❧ "The Ten Percent Plan." The Ten Percent Plan. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2014. ❧ "Europe and the American Civil War." Europe and the American Civil War. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2014. References (cont.) ❧ McPherson, James M. "18 John Bull's Virginia Reel." Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. N. pag. Print. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconstruction 1863–1877
    11926_18_ch17_p458 11/18/10 12:45 PM Page 458 C h m a 17 p o c t . e Hear the Audio b r a 1 l 7 y a or t ist www.myh Reconstruction 1863–1877 CHAPTER OUTLINE American Communities 459 The Election of 1868 White Resistance and “Redemption” Hale County, Alabama: From Slavery to Woman Suffrage and Reconstruction King Cotton: Sharecroppers,Tenants,and the Southern Environment Freedom in a Black Belt Community The Meaning of Freedom 469 Moving About Reconstructing the North 482 The Politics of Reconstruction 461 African American Families, Churches, The Age of Capital The Defeated South and Schools Liberal Republicans and the Election Abraham Lincoln’s Plan Land and Labor After Slavery of 1872 Andrew Johnson and Presidential The Origins of African American Politics The Depression of 1873 Reconstruction The Electoral Crisis of 1876 Free Labor and the Radical Southern Politics and Society 476 RepublicanVision Southern Republicans Congressional Reconstruction and the Reconstructing the States:A Impeachment Crisis Mixed Record 11926_18_ch17_p459-489 11/18/10 12:45 PM Page 459 Theodor Kaufmann (1814–1896), On to Liberty, 1867. Oil on canvas, 36 ϫ 56 in (91.4 ϫ 142.2 cm). Runaway slaves escaping through the woods. Art Resource/Metropolitan Museum of Art. Hale County, Alabama: From Slavery to Freedom in a Black Belt Community n a bright Saturday morning in May 1867, had recently been O4,000 former slaves streamed into the town of appointed a voter Greensboro, bustling seat of Hale County in west- registrar for the dis- central Alabama.They came to hear speeches from two trict.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Volume Xvi - Number 1
    Leader page to JHSSC Fall 2010 Set your Acrobat Reader to View > Page Display > Two-Up T HE J EWISH H ISTORICAL S OCIETY o f S O U T H C AROLINA SPRING 2011 VOLUME XVI - NUMBER 1 Register for the Spring Conference “Jews, Slavery, and the Civil War” May 24 – 26, 2011 College of Charleston Pages 11 – 13 PAGE 2 JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SOUTH CAROLINA In this issue From the President of the JHSSC 3 Ann Meddin Hellman When Grant Expelled the Jews 4 Jonathan D. Sarna After alienating American Jews in 1862 with his infamous antisemitic General Orders No. 11, Ulysses S. Grant later earned their trust as a two-term president. Ann Meddin Hellman President Diplomacy’s Cruel Sword: Confederate Agents in Pursuit of Recognition 6 Theodore Rosengarten On the cover: Judah P. Benjamin and Edwin De Leon—both men of Sephardic ancestry raised in South Columbia, South Carolina, Carolina—became bitter rivals in the diplomatic struggle to win recognition for the surrenders to General Confederacy. William T. Sherman, February 17, 1865. Early “He Was Like One of Us”: The Judaization of Abraham Lincoln 8 Gary P. Zola the next morning, a fire Abraham Lincoln’s Jewish contemporaries viewed him as a friend and ally. With the passage breaks out and spreads, of time, his stature in the eyes of American Jews rose to that of a biblical patriarch. engulfing the town. The Burning of Columbia, Registration for Spring Conference: “Jews, Slavery, and the Civil War” 11 South Carolina (1865), Conference Schedule, College of Charleston, May 24–26, 2011 12 by William Waud for Harper’s Weekly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconstruction Era And
    Facing History and Ourselves is an international educational and professional development organization whose mission is to engage students of diverse backgrounds in an examination of racism, prejudice, and antisemitism in order to promote the development of a more humane and informed citizenry. By studying the historical development of the Holocaust and other examples of genocide, students make the essential connection between history and the moral choices they confront in their own lives. For more information about Facing History and Ourselves, please visit our website at www.facinghistory.org. Copyright © 2015 by Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Facing History and Ourselves® is a trademark registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. The photograph used in the background of our front cover depicts the African American and Radical Republican members of the South Carolina legislature in the 1870s. South Carolina had the first state legislature with a black majority. This photo was created by opponents of Radical Reconstruction, and intended to scare the white population. See Lesson 8, “Interracial Democracy” for suggestions about how to use this image in the classroom. Photo credit: Library of Congress (1876). ISBN: 978-1-940457-10-9 Acknowledgments Primary writer: Daniel Sigward This publication was made possible by the support of the Richard and Susan Smith Family Foundation. Developing this guide was a collaborative effort that required the input and expertise of a variety of people. Many Facing History and Ourselves staff members made invaluable contributions. The guidance of Adam Strom was essential from start to finish. Jeremy Nesoff played a critical role through his partnership with Dan Sigward and, along with Denny Conklin and Jocelyn Stanton, helped to shape the curriculum by providing feedback on numerous drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Death of 'King Cotton' Led to Increased British Interest in India
    ENGL1101 Student: John Mays Instructor: Nathan Camp “Maharaj Cotton” How the Death of “King Cotton” Led to Increased British Interests in India In the 1830s, the Southeastern states were developing as a new economic power. The new growth was due to one crop — cotton. By 1860, nearly sixty percent of the total United States export was cotton. This cash crop pushed the young nation onto the world economic stage. In 1861, the nascent Confederacy was totally dependent on this “King” of the economy, and it played a major role in the Confederacy's downfall. As the American War Between the States dragged on and the Union blockade on Confederate ports remained in place, cotton exports decreased from a mighty river to a trickle. British textile mills, dependent on this supply, ground to a halt, and an alternative source of cotton had to be found. The eyes of a desperate Britain fell on India, and as “King Cotton” destroyed one country, it gave birth to another. Though the sphere of influence of cotton during the War Between the States is normally restricted to the United States, the deficit of southern cotton caused an increased British interest in the governing and development of India as a cotton producer. Prior to the invention of the cotton gin in 1794, large-scale production of long-staple cotton in the South was largely impractical. Long-staple cottons are known and named for their long fibers and high quality, and these varieties were desired by textile mills in Britain because they could be made into high-quality cloth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconstruction Era
    Name Date Class CHAPTER 18 The Reconstruction Era CHAPTER Chapter Overview BENCHMARKS SS.8.A.1.2 Analyze charts, graphs, After the Civil War, the federal government faced the maps, photographs and time lines; difficult task of putting the nation back together again. analyze political cartoons; determine Eleven states had tried and failed to break away from cause and effect. SS.8.A.1.7 View historic events the United States. Now, in defeat, they had to rejoin that through the eyes of those who were Union. The war had left the South in ruins. Finding a there as shown in their art, writings, music, and artifacts. plan to reunite the nation and rebuild the war-torn SS.8.A.4.3 Examine the experiences South would spark intense political conflicts. and perspectives of significant individuals and groups during this era Bitter conflicts also would surround the role of the of American History. newly freed African Americans. African Americans soon SS.8.A.5.7 Examine key events and peoples in Florida history as each gained the rights of citizenship, and African American impacts this era of American history. men gained the right to vote. But as the nation began to SS.8.A.5.8 Explain and evaluate the rebuild, those rights would be taken away by violence policies, practices, and consequences of Reconstruction (presidential and and intimidation, and African Americans in the South congressional reconstruction, Johnson’s impeachment, Civil Rights would be forced to continue the long struggle for Act of 1866, the 13th, 14th, and 15th equality.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 11 the SOUTH, SLAVERY, and KING COTTON 1800-1860 Objective
    CHAPTER 11 THE SOUTH, SLAVERY, AND KING COTTON 1800-1860 Objective • This chapter explores how dependence on agriculture and slavery shaped the distinctive economy and culture of the old south. I-THE DISTINCTIVENESS OF THE OLD SOUTH What set the Old South apart are its regional climate, geography in shaping its culture and economy. Its warm and humid climate was ideal for cultivating profitable crops such as tobacco, cotton, rice, and sugar cane, which led to the plantation system of large commercial agriculture and its dependence upon slave labor. Unlike the North, the South had few large cities, few railroads, few factories, and few schools. I-1 A Biracial Culture The most distinctive feature of the south was its race-based slavery. The majority of southern Whites did not own slaves, but they supported what John C. Calhoun called the South’s “Peculiar Institution” because slavery was so central to their society’s way of life. The Old South also differed from other sections of the country in its high proportion of native-born Americans, both whites and blacks. I-2 Many Souths Three distinct sub-regions with quite different economic interests and diverging degrees of commitment to slavery. The seven states making up the lower south (south Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and, Texas) = intensive cotton production and slave labor. The middle southern states (Virginia, north Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas) had diversified agricultural economies including large area without slavery. In the upper or border south (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri) slavery was beginning to decline by 1860. II-The Cotton Kingdom II-1 King Cotton During the first half of the 19th century, cotton surpassed rice as the most profitable cash crop in the South.
    [Show full text]
  • A House Divided: Reconstruction
    A House Divided: Reconstruction Essential Question: How might history have been different if alternate plans for the Reconstruction of the South had been put into practice? Brief Introduction: Political leaders and parties in the tense time after the Civil War proposed various plans for Reconstruction. By observing artwork of this period, students will learn how these plans affected the South (and North) and relationships between people of different races and geographic regions. Primary Subject and Grade Level: U.S. History, 8th and 11th grades National Standards: National History Standard Era 5: Civil War and Reconstruction (1850--1877) Standard 5-3: How various Reconstruction plans succeeded or failed Components: • Lesson Plan • Images • Student Activity Materials: • American Art Museum Reconstruction images: Lee Surrendering to Grant at Appomattox by Alonzo Chappel http://americanart.si.edu/images/1981/1981.139_1a.jpg Taking the Oath and Drawing Rations by John Rogers http://americanart.si.edu/images/1882/1882.1.1_1a.jpg A Visit from the Old Mistress by Winslow Homer http://americanart.si.edu/images/1909/1909.7.28_1a.jpg • Handout on Reconstruction Plans Keywords: Civil War, Reconstruction, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Republican, Congress, radical, composition, pose, and body language Procedure: Visual Analysis Exercise Use the images from the American Art Museum’s collection listed above. 1. Review key differences in plans for Reconstruction proposed by Abraham Lincoln, the Radical Republicans, and Andrew Johnson. 2. Display one image at a time. Ask students to “read” each one as they would a written story then analyze it as an interpretation of history. 3. Ask the students which Reconstruction plan each image most closely represents, especially in terms of mood and the physical relationship between the figures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port of New Orleans: an Economic History, 1821-1860. (Volumes I and Ii)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1985 The orP t of New Orleans: an Economic History, 1821-1860. (Volumes I and II) (Trade, Commerce, Slaves, Louisiana). Thomas E. Redard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Redard, Thomas E., "The orP t of New Orleans: an Economic History, 1821-1860. (Volumes I and II) (Trade, Commerce, Slaves, Louisiana)." (1985). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4151. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4151 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction Is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages In any manuscript may have Indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques Is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When It Is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to Indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to Indicate this.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention
    Best Integrated Writing Volume 3 Article 6 2016 Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention Shane Hapner Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/biw Part of the Business Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Hapner, S. (2016). Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention, Best Integrated Writing, 3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Best Integrated Writing by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact library- [email protected]. SHANE HAPNER HST 4650 Confederate Delusions: “King Cotton” and the Dream of Intervention SHANE HAPNER HST 4650: Civil War, Spring 2015 Nominated by: Dr. Drew Swanson Shane is a senior majoring in History with a focus on early-modern European history. He tends to focus on diplomatic and political history. He states that this is his first paper “outside that aegis.” Shane notes: I’m not fond of American history, and from the start of this project, I consciously made every effort to tie in European perspectives to increase my interest. This required my topic to be economic; however, it is the first paper of that kind I’d written, and it necessitated a use of microfilm sources for the figures I required. This paper, therefore, represents a synthesis of political, economic, and diplomatic perspectives. Dr. Swanson notes: Mr. Hapner’s research paper examines the Confederacy’s efforts at cotton diplomacy in France and Britain during the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruciotn
    Proclamation Of Amnesty And Reconstruciotn Democratic and cramoisy Samuel caravanned while lukewarm Austen backfills her tolerance wondrous and pittings euphemistically. Jabez remains black after Schroeder misestimated provincially or decoy any Ruthenian. Rafe co-starring his jabberwocky preceded inapplicably, but readying Hervey never industrializes so lushly. Their idea of new state william breedlove from amnesty proclamation Head Librarian of the Cincinnati Public Library, eventually obtained the manuscript. The union war was in justice. Widespread poverty among these conflicts that. He had been confiscated, though they could be given this proclamation of amnesty and reconstruciotn on diverse subjects ranging from holding elections. Amnesty proclamation and city annual message of Abraham. Subscribe through our Spartacus Newsletter and rope up till date flip the latest articles. The way towards what followed by transferring an oath is readmitted, was insisted on race relations, there will establish rules for black. South was severely threatened with republicans abandoned or foreign relations with him as they denied seats constitutionally rests exclusively with confederates tried and proclamation of amnesty and reconstruciotn known as part of slavery without physical safety of amnesty. What terms the Reconstruction era? He shall i return former confederacy, transform southern white supremacy in a proclamation of amnesty and reconstruciotn or tendency to help black men were in order rested. Confederate citizens of amnesty and make us history of war was a proclamation of amnesty and reconstruciotn former confederacy from any citizen of amnesty and authority and took an important economic. They lowered the status of freedmen. The great War era 144-177 US history Khan Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain and King Cotton: the Lancashire Cotton
    GREAT BRITAIN AND KING COTTON: THE LANCASHIRE COTTON FAMINE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR RYAN D KELL The Colorado College Department of History-Political Science Copyright © by Ryan D. Kell 2015 GREAT BRITAIN AND KING COTTON: THE LANCASHIRE COTTON FAMINE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by RYAN D KELL THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate School of The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of HISTORY-POLITICAL SCIENCE Department of History-Political Science THE COLORADO COLLEGE 2015 Acknowledgments I cannot express enough thanks to my thesis advisor, Lindsey Flewelling, Visiting Professor of History at Colorado College. Lindsey Was alWays Willing to help me With this project, Whether it Was With research or editing, while working a busy schedule of her own. I am extremely grateful for all the assistance she provided, and I could not have completed this task Without her. I would also like to thank David Hendrickson, Professor of Political Science at Colorado College. David helped me to polish my final product, making sure that I Was accurate and as persuasive With my argument as possible. My completion of this project Would not have been possible Without the help of my tWo academic advisors, Bryant “Tip” Ragan and Peter Blasenheim, both Professors of History at Colorado College. Tip, as my primary academic advisor, helped me navigate my four years of college and I Would not have been in position to graduate without him. Peter, my major advisor, has helped me to complete both my thesis and all my major requirements, always willing to give his honest opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • King Charles to King Cotton South Carolina 1670-1860
    King Charles to King Cotton South Carolina 1670-1860 Explore where it happened… King Charles to King Cotton is an educational field program hosted by three historic museum properties located within Charleston, SC. Designed for South Carolina Public Schools Grades 3rd & 8th Have questions? Call (843)724-8491 or visit www.HistoricCharleston.org Table of Contents Program Overview……………………………………….………………..…......2 Museums & Program Standards……….…………………………………..…….3 Scheduling, Rates, & Logistics………………….……………………………....6 Area Map (Arrival/Departure/Parking)……….................…………………………..….8 Program Overview Dear Educators, King Charles to King Cotton: South Carolina 1670-1860 is a South Carolina 3rd and 8th Grade program designed by educators affiliated with the following museum properties: The Powder Magazine - South Carolina’s Oldest Public Building, c. 1713 Historic Charleston Foundation’s Nathaniel Russell House Museum, c. 1808 Old Slave Mart Museum- Part of South Carolina’s Inter-State Slave Trade, c. 1856 The purpose of King Charles to King Cotton is to immerse students in South Carolina history by visiting three authentic properties located in historic Charleston. Program content includes the political, economic, and social transformations that shaped South Carolina between 1670 and 1860. Students will gain historic perspectives by walking in the footsteps of those who lived through the state’s Colonial, Revolutionary, and Antebellum periods. Participating museums are interconnected as a tangible timeline revealing South Carolina’s evolving political and economic history. Students will review how the institution of slavery served as a foundation for South Carolina throughout these transformative years. Thank you for considering this program for your students. We are confident that after experiencing King Charles to King Cotton, you will agree this field experience is the perfect method to either preview or reinforce what is being learned in your classroom.
    [Show full text]