DOCSLIB.ORG

Range Information Systems Management (Rism) Phase I Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Range Information Systems Management (Rism) Phase I Report https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20110015675 2019-08-30T17:18:14+00:00Z NASA/TM⎯2004-211523 RANGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (RISM) PHASE I REPORT Gary L. Bastin, Ph.D. ASRC Aerospace Corporation, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida William G. Harris, PE ASRC Aerospace Corporation, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida Richard A. Nelson NASA, YA-D7, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida September 2002 The NASA STI Program Office . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to meetings sponsored or cosponsored by the advancement of aeronautics and space NASA. science. The NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Program Office plays a key • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, part in helping NASA maintain this important technical, or historical information from role. NASA programs, projects, and mission, often concerned with subjects having The NASA STI Program Office is operated by substantial public interest. Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA’s scientific and technical information. • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. The NASA STI Program Office provides access English-language translations of foreign to the NASA STI Database, the largest scientific and technical material pertinent to collection of aeronautical and space science STI NASA’s mission. in the world. The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional mechanism for Specialized services that complement the STI disseminating the results of its research and Program Office’s diverse offerings include development activities. These results are creating custom thesauri, building customized published by NASA in the NASA STI Report databases, organizing and publishing research Series, which includes the following report results . even providing videos. types: For more information about the NASA STI • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of Program Office, see the following: completed research or a major significant phase of research that present the results of • Access the NASA STI Program Home Page NASA programs and include extensive data at http://www.sti.nasa.gov or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and • E-mail your question via the Internet to technical data and information deemed to be [email protected] of continuing reference value. NASA’s counterpart of peer-reviewed formal • Fax your question to the NASA STI Help professional papers but has less stringent Desk at (301) 621-0134 limitations on manuscript length and extent of graphic presentations. • Telephone the NASA STI Help Desk at (301) 621-0390 • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific and technical findings that are preliminary • Write to: or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release NASA STI Help Desk reports, working papers, and bibliographies NASA Center for AeroSpace that contain minimal annotation. Does not Information contain extensive analysis. 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076-1320 • CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and technical findings by NASA-sponsored contractors and grantees. • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected papers from scientific and technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other NASA/TM⎯2004-211523 RANGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (RISM) PHASE I REPORT Gary L. Bastin, Ph.D. ASRC Aerospace Corporation, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida William G. Harris, PE ASRC Aerospace Corporation, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida Richard A. Nelson NASA, YA-D7, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899-0001 September 2002 Acknowledgments .Although there is always the risk of inadvertently forgetting someone, the RISM team nonetheless wishes to acknowledge especially the assistance and guidance provided by the following individuals, listed alphabetically. Without the continued support of these supporters who believed in the value of this project, this project could not have accomplished all its goals. Name Organization Hugo Delgado NASA-KSC Eric Denson NASA-KSC Temel Erdogan Dynacs Mike Grant CSR-Tel-4 Debra Holiday FL Space Authority Don Hoover CSR-Optics Gary Janousek CSR-XY Chris Kerios Dynacs Ray Knighton ITT-SLRSC Dennis McCunnion CSR-TVOC Jules McNeff NASA-HQ Rich Nelson NASA-KSC Don Philp Dynacs John Rush NASA-HQ Jim Shaver NASA-Hanger AE Steve Schaefer Dynacs Steve Schindler NASA-KSC Darin Skelly NASA-KSC Stan Starr Dynacs Dave Struba NASA-HQ Lisa Valencia NASA-KSC John Walker CSR-JDMTA Phil Weber NASA-KSC Special thanks go to the late Steve Schaefer, who passed away during this project at a much too early age. He was instrumental in establishing the shared-access computer drives to enable the RISM team to work efficiently and effectively in the course of this project Available from: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service 7121 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Springfield, VA 22161 RISM – Phase 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS No. Description Page 1.0 RISM PHASE 1 PROGRAM............................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Historical Perspectives........................................................................ 1 1.1.2 Changing Needs and Changing Perspectives ...................................... 4 1.2 WORKING GROUP................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Description........................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Vision Statement.................................................................................. 5 1.3 OBJECTIVES............................................................................................. 6 1.4 SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 9 1.5 STRATEGIC PLANS............................................................................... 10 2.0 TIMELINE SUMMARIES ................................................................................ 17 2.1 AEROSPACE ........................................................................................... 18 2.2 COMMUNICATION................................................................................ 20 3.0 LAUNCH CENTERS AND RANGES (SUMMARY) ..................................... 23 3.1 EASTERN RANGE.................................................................................. 27 3.1.1 Background........................................................................................ 27 3.1.2 Facilities............................................................................................. 29 3.1.3 Instrumentation.................................................................................. 30 3.2 Kennedy Space Center.............................................................................. 33 3.2.1 Background........................................................................................ 33 3.2.2 Facilities............................................................................................. 36 3.2.3 Instrumentation.................................................................................. 38 3.3 WESTERN RANGE................................................................................. 39 3.3.1 Background........................................................................................ 39 3.3.2 Facilities............................................................................................. 40 3.3.3 Instrumentation.................................................................................. 41 3.4 WALLOPS ISLAND................................................................................ 43 3.4.1 Background........................................................................................ 43 3.4.2 Facilities............................................................................................. 43 3.4.3 Instrumentation.................................................................................. 45 3.5 OTHER RANGES.................................................................................... 45 4.0 COMMUNICATION / DATA NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES ................... 47 4.1 ETHERNET.............................................................................................. 48 4.1.1 10 Base T ........................................................................................... 50 4.1.2 Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) (1000BaseT/1000BaseX) and 10GbE......... 52 4.1.3 XAUI (10Gb/s), 40 Gb/s Ethernet (40 GbE), and 160 GbE.............. 55 4.1.4 DOCSIS and DSL.............................................................................. 57 4.2 Wireless Technologies.............................................................................. 59 4.2.1 Wireless Ethernet (Wi-Fi )................................................................. 61 4.2.2 Bluetooth............................................................................................ 77 4.2.3 3G Wireless ....................................................................................... 79 4.2.4 Zigbee ................................................................................................ 83 iii RISM – Phase 1 4.3 Free Space Optical (FSO) Communication Systems................................ 85 4.4 Spacewire.................................................................................................. 91 4.5 Firewire....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    1/9/2017 Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction home | about | documents | news | publications | FOIA | research | internships | search | donate | mailing list Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80 Updated ­ February 11, 2004 Edited by Jeffrey Richelson Originally posted December 20, 2002 Previously updated February 26, 2003 Documents ­ Press release ­ Further reading Between Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, and the commencement of military ac绳on in January 1991, then President George H.W. Bush raised the specter of the Iraqi pursuit of nuclear weapons as one jus绳fica绳on for taking decisive ac绳on against Iraq. In the then‐classified Na绳onal Security Direc绳ve 54, signed on January 15, 1991, authorizing the use of force to expel Iraq from Kuwait, he iden绳fied Iraqi use of weapons of mass destruc绳on (WMD) against allied forces as an ac绳on that would lead the U.S. to seek the removal of Saddam Hussein from power. (Note 1) In the aermath of Iraq's defeat, the U.S.‐led U.N. coali绳on was able to compel Iraq to agree to an inspec绳on and monitoring regime, intended to insure that Iraq dismantled its WMD programs and did not take ac绳ons to recons绳tute them. The means of implemen绳ng the relevant U.N. resolu绳ons was the Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM). That inspec绳on regime con绳nued un绳l December 16, 1998 ‐ although it involved interrup绳ons, confronta绳ons, and Iraqi aꬫempts at denial and decep绳on ‐ when UNSCOM withdrew from Iraq in the face of Iraqi refusal to cooperate, and harassment. Subsequent to George W. Bush's assump绳on of the presidency in January 2001, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DETROIT BUSINESS MAIN 02-05-07 a 9 CDB.Qxd
    DETROIT BUSINESS MAIN 02-05-07 A 9 CDB 2/2/2007 11:54 AM Page 1 February 5, 2007 CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS Page 9 OTHER VOICES: How to rethink taxes and spending We need fundamental reforms keep calling for large-scale consoli- services than Michigan. Signifi- states tax beer at five times Michi- in how Michigan both spends and dation of business operations. cant sums could be raised by taxing gan’s rate of 2 cents per bottle. Oth- collects our taxes. Such ideas could gain traction if more items while lowering the rate. ers raise significant cash through This isn’t some obscure argu- state aid were tied to proven effi- Business tax: Lower the rate sales taxes on soda pop. It’s hard to ment best left to academics and bu- ciencies. and broaden the base. Fewer than imagine producing businesses leav- reaucrats. It’s at the core of such Critically examine public-sector 500 Michigan businesses pay more ing Michigan because our taxes on living room issues as the rising pay and benefits. Michigan taxpay- than a third of the entire single- unhealthy beverages are too high. costs of college, the dependability business tax. More than 80,000 A paper containing full discus- ers are on the hook for $35 billion in of your local cops and firefighters, businesses pay no SBT. sion of these ideas is online at unfunded public-sector pension and the security of your job. Graduate the income tax. Michi- www.thecenterformichigan.net. What to do? We have a choice. and health care costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Minotaur I User's Guide
    This page left intentionally blank. Minotaur I User’s Guide Revision Summary TM-14025, Rev. D REVISION SUMMARY VERSION DOCUMENT DATE CHANGE PAGE 1.0 TM-14025 Mar 2002 Initial Release All 2.0 TM-14025A Oct 2004 Changes throughout. Major updates include All · Performance plots · Environments · Payload accommodations · Added 61 inch fairing option 3.0 TM-14025B Mar 2014 Extensively Revised All 3.1 TM-14025C Sep 2015 Updated to current Orbital ATK naming. All 3.2 TM-14025D Sep 2018 Branding update to Northrop Grumman. All 3.3 TM-14025D Sep 2020 Branding update. All Updated contact information. Release 3.3 September 2020 i Minotaur I User’s Guide Revision Summary TM-14025, Rev. D This page left intentionally blank. Release 3.3 September 2020 ii Minotaur I User’s Guide Preface TM-14025, Rev. D PREFACE This Minotaur I User's Guide is intended to familiarize potential space launch vehicle users with the Mino- taur I launch system, its capabilities and its associated services. All data provided herein is for reference purposes only and should not be used for mission specific analyses. Detailed analyses will be performed based on the requirements and characteristics of each specific mission. The launch services described herein are available for US Government sponsored missions via the United States Air Force (USAF) Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC), Advanced Systems and Development Directorate (SMC/AD), Rocket Systems Launch Program (SMC/ADSL). For technical information and additional copies of this User’s Guide, contact: Northrop Grumman
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Era Fact Sheet
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle Era Facts NASA’s shuttle fleet achieved numerous firsts and opened Enterprise was the first space shuttle, although it never up space to more people than ever before during the Space flew in space. It was used to test critical phases of landing and Shuttle Program’s 30 years of missions. other aspects of shuttle preparations. Enterprise was mounted The space shuttle, officially called the Space Transportation on top of a modified 747 airliner for the Approach and Landing System (STS), began its flight career with Columbia roaring off Tests in 1977. It was released over the vast dry lakebed at Launch Pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida Edwards Air Force Base in California to prove it could glide and on April 12, 1981. land safely. That first mission verified the combined performance of Columbia, OV-102, was named after a sloop captained the orbiter vehicle (OV), its twin solid rocket boosters (SRBs), by Robert Gray, who on May 11, 1792, maneuvered his ship giant external fuel tank (ET) and three space shuttle main through dangerous inland waters to explore British Columbia engines (SSMEs). It also put to the test the teams and what are now the states of Washington and facts that manufactured, processed, launched and Oregon. Columbia was the first shuttle to fly into managed the unique vehicle system, which consists orbit on STS-1. Its first four missions were test of about 2 1/2 million moving parts. flights to show that the shuttle design was sound.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Data Link Requirements Overview
    HIGH-SPEED, LOW-POWER, EXCELLENT EMC: LVDS FOR ON-BOARD DATA HANDLING Dr SM Parkes Applied Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK Tel: 44 1382 345194, Fax: 44 1382 345509, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Since the endorsement of the IEEE 1355 by ESA and major companies involved in the space industry, the technology has The capabilities of remote-sensing instrumentation are been migrated successfully into radiation-tolerant, space- developing rapidly. As a consequence the data rates being qualifiable components. Daimler-Benz Aerospace and TEMIC handled on-board spacecraft are increasing. have developed a component (SMCS) which provides three LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling) provides a means IEEE 1355 compatible links and a processor interface (Ref. 4). of sending data along a twisted pair cable at high speed, with Demonstration systems have been and are being developed for low power and with excellent EMC performance. These both multi-DSP processing systems (Ref. 5) and for large features make LVDS ideal for satellite on-board data-handling capacity, solid-state data storage systems (Ref. 6). High level applications. protocols have been developed to support interprocessor communication (Ref. 7). Software support for the SMCS link This paper assesses the suitability of LVDS for space devices has been provided within the Eonic Virtuoso real-time applications as part of a data-handling system based on IEEE operating system for both the TSC21020 DSP processor and 1355 comparing it against other types of line driver/receiver. the ERC32 SPARC 32-bit processor (Ref. 8). It explains how LVDS can be used together with IEEE 1355 to form the basis for a powerful on-board data handling system, The Digital Interface Circuit Evaluation (DICE) study was which is capable of handling data from current and future, initiated by ESTEC to take stock of these developments, to high data-rate instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelado Y Validación De Un Sistema Digital De Comunicaciones De Gran Ancho De Banda De Aplicación En Vehículos De Transporte
    UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA COMILLAS DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA (ICAI) (Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica) Modelado y validación de un sistema digital de comunicaciones de gran ancho de banda de aplicación en vehículos de transporte Tesis para la obtención del grado de Doctor Director: Prof. Dr. D. Sadot Alexandres Fernández Autor: Ing. D. Carlos Rodríguez-Morcillo García Madrid 2007 CONSTANCIA REGISTRAL DEL TRIBUNAL DEL ACTO DE LA DEFENSA DE TESIS DOCTORAL TÍTULO: Modelado y validación de un sistema digital de comunicaciones de gran ancho de banda de aplicación en vehículos de transporte AUTOR: D. Carlos Rodríguez-Morcillo García DIRECTOR: Dr. D. Sadot Alexandres Fernández TUTOR-PONENTE: -- DEPARTAMENTO: Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica FACULTAD O ESCUELA: Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería (ICAI) Miembros del Tribunal Calificador: PRESIDENTE: Dr. D. Manuel Mazo Quintas Firma: ................................ VOCAL: Dr. D. José Luís Martín González Firma: ................................ VOCAL: Dr. D. César Sanz Álvaro Firma: ................................ VOCAL: Dr. D. Rafael Palacios Hielscher Firma: ................................ SECRETARIO: Dr. D. José Daniel Muñoz Frías Firma: ................................ Fecha de lectura: 19 de septiembre de 2007 Calificación: ……………………………………………………. A María, a mis padres y a mi hermano. A la memoria de Quique. Resumen En esta Tesis se propone un sistema digital de comunicaciones que per- mite transmitir una gran cantidad de información entre los equipos embar- cados en un vehículo de transporte, aumentando así la capacidad de trans- misión de los sistemas instalados actualmente. Además, el sistema propues- to es capaz de funcionar compartiendo el mismo medio físico que los siste- mas actuales, para minimizar el coste económico y de recursos que supone la instalación de un nuevo sistema en un vehículo ya fabricado.
    [Show full text]
  • UNMOVIC Working Document
    UNMOVIC Working document 6 March 2003 UNRESOLVED DISARMAMENT ISSUES IRAQ’S PROSCRIBED WEAPONS PROGRAMMES 6 March 2003 UNMOVIC Working document 6 March 2003 Intentionally Blank UNMOVIC Working document 6 March 2003 UNRESOLVED DISARMAMENT ISSUES IRAQ’S PROSCRIBED WEAPONS PROGRAMMES TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………….3 NOTES ON FACTORS THAT HAVE SHAPED IRAQ’S POLICIES ON WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION………………...…………………….5 DEVELOPMENTS FROM DECEMBER 1998 TO PRESENT……………..11 CLUSTERS OF UNRESOLVED DISARMAMENT ISSUES……………….19 APPENDIX A HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF IRAQ’S PROSCRIBED WEAPONS PROGRAMMES…………………………………………………………….....135 Page 1 of 173 UNMOVIC Working document 6 March 2003 Intentionally Blank Page 2 of 173 UNMOVIC Working document 6 March 2003 INTRODUCTION Security Council resolution 1284 (1999) requires UNMOVIC to “address unresolved disarmament issues” and to identify “key remaining disarmament tasks.” Which are these issues and tasks? The Council must have intended UNMOVIC to turn to issues and tasks existing at the time when the Commission has gone into operation and begins to tackle unresolved issues by inspection and is able to assess which are key among them. As inspections resumed on 27 November 2002, it would mean issues and tasks existing on and after that date. UNMOVIC has spent considerable time and effort since it came into being to compile, review and analyze relevant information in this regard. The starting point has been two documents, which existed when the resolution was adopted and which listed unresolved issues: one report compiled by UNSCOM focusing on material balance questions and presented to the Security Council on 29 January 1999 (S/1999/94) and the other contained in the report of the Amorim panel of 30 March 1999 (S/1999/356).
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Form Art at Saint Mary's
    Summer 2007 . Finding Form Art at Saint Mary’s Your gift to the Annual Fund creates. Your gift could help a young woman... who has always dreamed in color... attend Saint Mary’s... where she will learn theories and techniques… and study the ideas and events… that have inspired expression through the ages… ideas that will change her perspective… and give her the power… to change the perspective of others. The Annual Fund A Larger Canvas Gifts to the Annual Fund help provide fifinancial nancial aidaid andand scholarshipsscholarships toto SaintSaint Mary’sMary's students.students. NineNine out out of ten Saint Mary’sMary's studentsstudents receivereceive somesome kindkind ofof fifinancial nancial assistance.assistance. YourYour contribution,contribution, largelarge oror small, small, makes a difference! Please support the Annual Fund by making a gift onlineonline atat www.saintmarys.eduwww.saintmarys.edu oror byby callingcalling (800)(800) SMC-8871.SMC-8871. tableof contents Volume 82, Number 2 Summer 2007 FEATURES Courier (USPS 135-340) is published four times a year by Saint Mary’s College, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5001. 4 From Inspiration Periodicals postage paid at the Post Offi ce at Notre Dame, IN 46556 to Installation and at additional mailing offi ces. POSTMASTER: Send address changes by Scot Erin Briggs to Alumnae Relations, Saint Mary’s College, 110 Le Mans Hall, Notre The fourth in a six-part series on the Dame, IN 46556-5001. College’s nationally accredited programs. Copyright 2007 Saint Mary’s College, Page 4 Notre Dame, IN 46556. Reproduction in whole or part is 10 The Artist’s Way prohibited without written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • A Flexible Glass Produced in Space Shows Promise As a Catalyst For
    HYPERSONICS 36 Q&A 8 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 26 Predicting bad vibes U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran on FAA, NASA Leaping from automation to autonomy SPARKING THE SPACE ECONOMY A fl exible glass produced in space shows promise as a catalyst for building an economy in space. PAGE 16 JANUARY 2020 | A publication of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics | aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org www.dspace.com SCALEXIO® – Fitting your needs SCALEXIO, the dSPACE real-time simulation technology for developing and testing embedded systems, is easily scalable to perfectly match the demands of your project – whatever your aims might be: Developing new control algorithms Testing single control units Control test rigs for actuators Integration tests of large, networked systems SCALEXIO always fits your needs – what are you aiming for? FEATURES | January 2020 MORE AT aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org An artist’s rendering of a potential moon base that would be constructed through 3D printing, which is considered an important technique for building an economy in space. European Space Agency 12 26 40 16 Dream Chaser’s Planes vs. cars Defending Earth new champion from asteroids Manufacturing While autonomous Janet Kavandi, a aircraft appear to A partnership between in space former astronaut be building on the governments and the and former director advances of nascent commercial A fi ber optic material called ZBLAN of NASA’s Glenn self-driving cars, space industry could be the product that jump-starts Research Center, operating in more would guarantee the dimensions carries the space economy. takes charge of Sierra reliability and rapid Nevada Corp.’s Space special challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Area Offices Akron, OH (330) 434-1875 Jackson, MI (517) 782-7822 San Francisco, CA (650) 737-0370 Alaska (907) 344-0101 Jacksonville, FL (904) 398-9944 San Jose, CA (408) 988-8915 Albany, NY (518) 783-4336 Kalamazoo, MI (616) 343-0860 San Juan, Puerto Rico (787) 782-3044 Albuquerque, NM (505) 262-0853 Kansas City, MO (816) 561-3558 Santa Rosa, CA (707) 546-2578 Allentown, PA (610) 770-6223 Kingsport, TN (423) 392-8841 *Savannah, GA (912) 525-3991 sdlvjn Arizona , Inc. (602) 271-4210 Knoxville, TN (423) 584-4359 Scranton, PA (570) 346-9080 Arkansas (501) 280-9118 Lafayette, IN (765) 497-8833 Seattle, WA (206) 296-2600 Ashland, KY (606) 329-1699 Lancaster, PA (717) 397-5779 Shreveport, LA (318) 861-1778 Atlanta, GA (404) 257-1932 Lanett, AL (334) 644-4900 Sioux City, IA (712) 255-3519 Augusta, GA (706) 722-8345 Lansing, MI (517) 332-4585 Sioux Falls, SD (605) 336-7318 Annual Report Austin, TX (512) 837-5252 Las Vegas, NV (702) 362-8649 Spartanburg, SC (864) 585-9381 Bakersfield, CA (805) 328-9373 Lexington, KY (606) 219-2423 Spokane, WA (509) 624-7114 Baltimore, MD (410) 527-1966 Lima, OH (419) 225-5816 Springfield, MA (413) 525-5600 Baton Rouge, LA (225) 928-7008 Lincoln, NE (402) 467-1010 Springfield, MO (417) 873-6989 Battle Creek, MI (616) 968-9188 Longview, TX (903) 297-2202 Springfield, OH (937) 323-4725 Birmingham, AL (205) 879-9365 Lorain, OH (440) 329-3313 St. Joseph/Benton Harbor, MI (616) 983-7579 Boise, ID (208) 345-3990 Los Angeles, CA (323) 957-1818 Stamford, CT (203) 327-2535 Boston, MA (617) 367-5850 Louisville, KY (502)
    [Show full text]
  • Spacewire Handbook
    SpaceWire Handbook DRAFT - SVN version 45 - September 24, 2012 4Links Limited Suite E U 2 BletchleyPark Milton Keynes, MK3 6EB United Kingdom Copyright © 2012 4Links Limited. SpaceWire Handbook DRAFT - SVN version 45 - September 24, 2012 Foreword This Draft Handbook is 4Links Limited’sinitial contribution to the forthcoming ECSS SpaceWire Handbook. Change Log Date Version 2012/06/29 First draft issue 2012/09/24 Second draft issue Copyright © 2012 4Links Limited. 2 SpaceWire Handbook DRAFT - SVN version 45 - September 24, 2012 Table of Contents Title Page ......................... 1 Foreword . ........................ 2 Change Log ........................ 2 1. Introduction ....................... 6 1.1. Purpose ....................... 6 1.2. Scope ........................ 6 1.3. Acknowledgements . ................... 6 1.4. Document structure . ................... 7 2. Terms, definitions and abbreviations ............... 8 2.1. Terms and definitions from other documents ............ 8 2.2. Terms specific to the present handbook ............. 8 2.2.1. SpaceWire End-Point .................. 8 2.2.2. SpaceWire Node ................... 8 2.2.3. SpaceWire Unit ................... 8 2.3. Abbreviated terms .................... 8 3. References ........................ 9 4. Introduction to SpaceWire .................. 10 4.1. Background and History .................. 10 4.1.1. 1960 -AModular Computer ............... 10 4.1.2. 1980 -System on Chip, Serial Interfaces . ........... 11 4.1.3. Transputer serial links in space ............... 11 4.1.4. Modularity ..................... 12 4.1.5. 1990+ Transputer links to IEEE-1355 ............ 12 4.1.6. IEEE-1355 and early SpaceWire in Space ........... 13 4.2. The current SpaceWire Standard ................ 13 4.2.1. Data-Strobe encoding . ................. 14 4.2.2. Low-levelflow-control . ................ 15 4.2.3. Packets . ..................... 15 4.2.4. Packet Routing .................... 15 4.2.5.
    [Show full text]