Municipal Elections Document Date: 1996

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Municipal Elections Document Date: 1996 Date Printed: 10/28/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 1 Tab Number: 14 Document Title: Armenia: Technical Assistance, November 10. 1996 Municipal Elections Document Date: 1996 Document Country: Armenia IFES ID: R01514 * D~I~~I~ A E .." ... .. ~. ,--.--~--- ;".,~-"'- ."',. , ,",. J .' " " f~: ' ,: j ".~~~~ ,"'- , , L :F '0 ~ . " ~, .. ", . ,~ [ ,~ " , " ;:..-, ' ;1,. ~ " . ,..... "', ". ·'if... .. ,~.: .. , .:>;,j,,~ " PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE FROM RESOURCE CENTER I I I I Armenia I Technical Assistance November 10,1996 Municipal Elections I I I By: Ann Gardner I Christopher Shie!ds Jim Stover I I Edited by: Alexandra M Levaditis I I I I II-7ES I ~ International Foundation for Election Systems 1101 15th Street, N.W., Third Floor I Washington, D.C. 20005 phone: (202) 828-8507 fax: (202) 452-0804 I I I I Contents I Executive Summary................................................................................ 1 I I. Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 I II. Local Election Process ....................................................................... 8 I III. Election Preparation ........................................................................ 9 IV. Voting Process .................................................................................. 17 I V. Completion of Voting ........................................................................ 19 I VI. Observers ........................................................................................... 25 VII. Recommendations ........................................................................... 31 I VIII. Conclusion ...................................................................................... 37 I I I I I I I I I I I I Executive Summary I Project Background. The current IFES Electoral Reform Project was initiated by a February 1996 request from the Chairman of the National Assembly, Babken Ararktsyan, to the u.s. I Ambassador to the Republic of Armenia, Peter Tomsen. The purpose of the request was to seek assistance in the preparation of the election laws governing the presidential and municipal elections scheduled for Fall 1996. The project was a follow-up to the 1995 IFES Technical I Assistance Mission to Armenia in connection with the National Assembly elections and Constitutional Referendum. The 1995 election and referendum were marred by charges of fraud and intimidation, and numerous questions were raised by both international and domestic I monitoring groups regarding the fairness and transparency of the process. I IFES placed Christopher Shields on the ground in Yerevan, Armenia, as Project Manager in late February 1996. He was joined by Election Administration Specialist Ann Gardner in March 1996. Election Law Consultant Mark Braden of Baker & Hostetler of Washington, DC and an I outside counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives for election law, provided additional expertise to the Mission. I The IFES/Armenia Mission. The Mission's charge for 1996 was to serve as a technical information resource, to provide assistance to the National Assembly on election law development, to direct technical assistance to the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) in the I form of specialized election administration assistance, to conduct high-impact voter education outreach, and to strengthen the NGO community. With these goals in mind, IFES: I • developed and distributed a training manual for Precinct Electoral Commission members; I • conducted instruction seminars for election officials in all 11 regions of Armenia; • conducted voter education through the production and distribution of over 40,000 I infqrmational posters and fliers; and • produced a series of "Town Hall" forums which brought representatives of the CEC to ·1 the Armenian public to explain the Law on Elections for President for the Republic of A rmenia on local television, reaching over 1 million people in ten of the eleven regions. I Currently, the Mission is working on the development of a universal electoral code for all future elections in Armenia, as well as a series of other electoral reform projects, including continued voter education and information programming focused on increased citizen participation in I building and strengthening democratic institutions. I I 1 I I I Review and Assessment. In the aftermath of the 22 September presidential election and the civil . unrest which followed', IFES conducted a full review of its programming options and elected to remain active in the effort to improve the electoral system and its administration by continuing I its assistance to the Central Electoral Commission. A comprehensive list of areas of critical concern, based on eyewitness observations of the IFES I Mission 'during the 22 September election, was prepared and is included in Section VII. Recommendations. These recommendations are based on the overall events during the elections, provisions of the law in place at the time of the elections, and observations at the polling places, I and address the following areas: • Electoral Commission Accountability I • Training Curriculum for Electoral Commission Members " • Removal of Electoral Commission Members I • Future Municipal Governance Structures • Pre-Election Campaign-Media I • Preparation of Voter Lists I • Ballot Accountability • Procedure for Invalidating Ballots I • Unauthorized Persons in Polling Places I • Announcement of Final Results I • Recount Provisions • Appeals Process I • Domestic Observers I • Election Law Violators I 'Appendix 1, IFES Technical Assessment Report, Armenian Presidential Election, issued 8 October I 1996. 2 I • I I I • Political Party Law I • Commonality Issues I • Transparency A continuation of the IFES Election Administration training was determined necessary, although, as with the presidential election, promises by the Yerevan Regional Electoral Commission (REe) I to facilitate participation by precinct commission chairmen were never fulfilled. Electoral Process. First stage municipal elections were conducted on 10 November, with second I stage elections scheduled for 24 November. Not all communities were able to complete the election process by 24 November due to lack of candidates, court challenges, or, III one I community (in Yerevan), because election officials refused to hold the election. IFES Access. The IFES Mission was granted open access to all electoral commissions at all levels. I As noted above, the CEC granted the Mission access to all precincts for the purpose of conducting technical observation. The results of the observations were compiled into a memorandum I presented to CEC chairman Khachatour Bezirjian2. Election Day. Permission was sought from and granted by the CEC to allow the IFES Mission to conduct technical observation of the 10 November first-stage Municipal Elections. The I observations were conducted in 21 precincts within the Yerevan and Aragotsotn regions. I I I I I I I 2 Appendix 2. I 3 I .---------------- I I I. Introduction I A. Scope of Project As part of the overall IFES Mission to Armenia, technical assistance was planned for both the 22 I September Presidential Election and the 10 November Municipal Elections. This assistance was provided to the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) in the form of technical advice, voter I education materials, election administration training programming and materials, and other items as requested. In addition to the technical assistance, IFES provided on the spot assessments of I proposed regulations, election day processes, and other issues. Following the Presidential and Municipal Elections, IFES prepared a series of recommendations for the parliamentary Committee for State and Legal Issues. This committee has been mandated I with responsibility for election laws by the Law on Regulations for the National Assembly. I B. Country Background Armenia is the only former Republic of the former Soviet Union to acquire independence under the provisions of the Constitution of the Soviet Union, via referendum in 1991. At the same I time, Levon Ter-Petrosian, a leader of the Karabakh Committee, was elected President by a wide majority. Armenia was regarded as a leader among the former Republics in terms of democratic development. However, subsequent outbreak of hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan I over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh territory, and the resulting blockade by both Turkey and Azerbaijan, forced Armenia into a siege environment which disrupted normal democratic I development. Six months prior to the July 1995 parliamentary elections, President Ter-Petrosian unexpectedly I issued a decree banning the Armenia Revolutionary Federation-Dashnaktsyn (ARF) on the basis of allegations of terrorism and threats to overthrow the government by force. The ARF was, at the time, one of the most vocal and organized opposition parties in the country and had been I expected to do well in parliamentary elections. The ban, which was supposed to be effective for only six months, remains in effect more than two years later. I The parliamentary elections, held in conjunction with the referendum on the new constitution, were observed by the United Nations (UN) and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). A domestic observer organization consisting of five non-governmental I organizations (NGOs) under the umbrella organization of "Vote Armenia" also took part in observing the election. The resultant reports of those organizations alleged numerous cases of I voter and
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report on the Activities of the Human Rights Defender in 2006
    ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 The present "Annual Report for 2006 on Activities of the Republic of Armenia's Human Rights Defender" has been translated and published with the financial support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) ISBN 978-99941-0-213-6 ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 Yerevan, 2007 Yerevan 2007 RA Human Rights Defender A. Harutyunyan In the result of constitutional amendments, Human Rights Defender's Office was mandated as a constitutional institution. On February 17, 2005, National Assembly of RA by the votes of more than 3/5 of the total num- ber of deputies elected Doctor of Law, Professor Armen Harutyunyan as a first parliamentary Human Rights Defender of RA. Human Rights Defender is an independent official, whose main mission is to prevent and restore human rights and fundamental freedoms violated by the state and local self-governing bodies or their officials. The letters of complaint, addressed to the Defender, are various and concern almost all spheres of functioning of state and local self-governing bodies. The actuality of the report is determined also by the circumstance that for the first time are sep- arated the analysis of the statutory- legal act that leads to the human rights violations and the analysis of detached provisions, as well as the shortcoming in law enforcement practices. This report aims to raise a list of questions that are peculiar to the post soviet countries and exist in our country.
    [Show full text]
  • News from Copenhagen 217.Indd
    News from Copenhagen Number 217 Current Information from the OSCE PA International Secretariat 18 April 2007 President Lennmarker visits the European Parliament President Göran Lennmarker by parliamentarians. President Lennmarker with the Head of the EP Election Co- met with the President of the ordination Group, Josep Borrell. Lennmarker briefed the Group European Parliament, Hans- on the OSCE Parliamentary Gert Pöttering and the EP’s Assembly’s perspective on Election Co-ordination Group these issues. All interlocutors - co-chaired by Josep Borrell agreed that political Fontelles (Spain) and Jacek judgement by experienced Saryusz-Wolski (Poland) on parliamentarians must play 17 April 2007 in Brussels. The a central role in observation Election Co-ordination Group missions. President Pöttering is responsible for the election and Members of the Election observation missions conducted Co-ordination Group by the European Parliament. welcomed establishing even The main focus of discussion closer co-operation between was the need for political international parliamentary leadership of election observation by parliamentarians. bodies in election observation. In this regard, the importance Members of the Election Co-ordination Group shared of the international community speaking with one unified their experiences with regard to their co-operation with the voice was underlined. Governmental structures of the EU in election observation Secretary General Spencer Oliver and Deputy Secretary and highlighted the importance of having long term General
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Journal of Political Science
    ISSN 1829 - 4286 Armenian Journal of Political Science 1 201 7 Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences Center of Pe r spective Researches and Initiatives ARJPS published in the framework of Project “Center of Perspective Researches and Initiatives ” of the Scientific State Committee (Ministry of Education and Science, RA) E DITORIAL B OARD Tigran Toro syan (Editor) Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences , Armenia Sergiu Chelak Romanian Institute of International Studies, Romania Yuri Gasparyan Armenian State Pedagogical University Jerzy Jaskiernia Jan Kochanowski University, Kiel ce, Poland Malkhaz Matsaberidze Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University , Georgia Andrey Medushevsky National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Russia Sergey Minasyan Caucasus Institute , Armenia Karlen Mirumyan Brusov State Universi ty of Languages and Social Sciences , Armenia Anna Ohanyan Stonehill College, USA Rainer Schulze University of Essex, United Kingdom Irina Semenenko Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the RAS, Russia Levon Shirinyan Armenian Sta te Pedagogical University Victor Soghomonyan Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences , Armenia Albert Stepanyan Yerevan State University , Armenia Petra Stykow Ludwig - Maximilians Universit ät M ü n c h en , Germany Talin Ter Minasian INALCO , France Levon Ze k i y an Venetian Institute of Oriental Studies, Italy ISSN 1829 - 4286 © Center of Pe r spective Researches and Initiatives , 201 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS TO THE AUTHORS OF ARJPS 4 NEW WORLD ORDER: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS Tigran Torosyan, Grigor Arshakyan Geopolitical Aspect of Russian - Turkish Relations: Rivalry or 5 Cooperation? Malkhaz Matsaberidze Peculiarities of F oreign Policy Orientation of Georgia’s Ethnic 29 Minorities POST - SOVIET TRANSFORMATIO N Anna Khvorostiankina ‘Constitutional Identity’ in the Context of Post - Soviet Transformation, Europeanization and Regional Integration Processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment Chapter 6
    Chapter 6 Risk Assessment Chapter 6 Risk Assessment 6.1 Damage of Buildings The building damage functions for multi-story residential buildings, for low-rise individual houses and for schools and hospitals are made mainly based on the damage by Spitak earthquake in 1988. Therefore, the seismic resistance of the buildings in 1988 is considered tacitly in creating the damage function; however, already over 20 years has passed from 1988. Most building in Yerevan has been constructed before 1991 and the aging effect to the seismic resistance of the buildings is a matter of concern. Also the maintenance of the residential buildings after 1991 is said to became poor than before. The effects of these issues are necessary to be included for realistic risk assessment. The quantitative effects are evaluated by expert judgment in discussing with Armenian researchers and concluded that the damage ratio is increased 10% for aging effect and 10% for poor maintenance issue. As a result, the damage functions in Figures 5.3-17, 5.3-19 and 5.3-20 are multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the damage of buildings. 6.1.1 Multi-story residential buildings Number of heavily damaged multi-story residential buildings per grid of 250m x 250m against two scenario earthquakes is shown in Figure 6.1-1. 6.1.2 Individual house Number of heavily damaged individual houses per grid of 250m x 250m is shown in Figure 6.1-2. 6.1.3 Summary of damage of buildings 1) Damages of multi-story buildings and individual houses at each district are summarized in Table 6.1-1.
    [Show full text]
  • On Development of Yerevan Metro to Ajapnyak District
    ON DEVELOPMENT OF YEREVAN METRO TO AJAPNYAK DISTRICT Background and Brief information about Yerevan Metro The construction of the Yerevan metro began since 1972. Geological research has revealed that the static groundwater level is at a depth of 9 meters above the ground. This meant that the tunnel structures of the metro had to be installed in the most saturated parts of the groundwater. Under conditions of unprecedented infiltration of water drilling was impossible, which inevitably led to an artificial lowering of the groundwater level. This process was carried out by digging shafts up to 58 meters deep from the surface of the tunnels along the proposed route, high-efficiency deep pumps were installed in them (approximately 220 m 3 / hour), which continuously lowered the water level for 24 hours, somehow creating an opportunity to drill tunnels. The total number of exploration and labor shafts was more than 100, however, it was not possible to lower the water level below the lower level of the tunnel under construction, and to make a free drilling. Due to the difficult hydrogeological conditions of Yerevan, subsoil did not allow to make drilling without expelling huge amounts of accumulated water to the surface. Except the many water supply pumps, pumping stations were built and installed in the tunnels, which together pump 10-12 thousand cubic meters of water per hour. Under these conditions, it was impossible to provide high performance or high- speed tunnel crossing. It was impossible to drill or fasten more than one meter per day from each crossing point. Tunnel workers from different cities of the Soviet Union, who drilled 10 meters more every day in their cities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia
    Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. GE JR Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. 12-181 Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Structure of Volume of Final Report Vol. Title Language Armenian I Summary English Japanese Armenian Main Report 1 II English Risk Assessment of Yerevan City Japanese Armenian Main Report 2 III English Yerevan Earthquake Disaster Management Plan Japanese Armenian IV Data Book English Exchange rate used in this report 1.00 US Dollar (US$) = 407.43 Armenia Drams (AMD) 1.00 Japanese Yen (JPY) = 5.19 Armenia Drams (AMD) (as of October 8, 2012) Outline of the Project Outline of the Project 1. Background Title: The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Counterpart Agency: Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) Project Period: August 2010 - December 2012 The goal of this project is “Reduction of Disasters due to a large scale earthquake which has a possibility of occurrence in Yerevan City”.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst Vol 9, No 21
    Central AsiaAsia----CaucasusCaucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 9 NO. 21 31 OCTOBER 2007 Contents Analytical Articles TERTER----PETROSYANPETROSYAN CHALLENGES ARMENIA’S KARABAKH ELITE 3 Blanka Hancilova and Olga Azatyan CHINA’S RECENT ENERGY GAINS IN CENTRAL ASIA: WHAT DO TTHEYHEY PORTENDPORTEND???? 6 Stephen Blank THE POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS BEHIND GRIGORI RAPOTA’S APPOINTMENT 8 Kevin Daniel Leahy SECOND CASPIAN SUMMIT FAILS TO RESOLVE CONTENTIOUS ISSUES 11 Richard Weitz Field Reports TASHKENT REAL ESTATE BOOM NO LONGER IN LOCAL HHANDSANDS 14 Benjamin Abner NEW INCIDENT IN GEORGIANGEORGIAN----ABKHAZABKHAZ CONFLICT ZONE STRAINS RUSSIANRUSSIAN----GEORGIANGEORGIAN RELATIONS FURTHER 15 Johanna Popjanevski UZBEKISTANUZBEKISTAN----TURKMENISTAN:TURKMENISTAN: LATEST SIGN OF GROWING REGIONAL COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA 16 Erkin Akhmadov THE BATTLE FOR TAJIKISTAN’S WHITE GOLD 18 Sergey Medrea News Digest 20 THE CENTRAL ASIAASIA----CAUCASUSCAUCASUS ANALYST Editor Svante E. Cornell Assistant Editor, News Digest Alima Bissenova Chairman, Editorial Board S. Frederick Starr The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is an English language global Web journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing the Central Asia-Caucasus region. It serves to link the business, governmental, journalistic and scholarly communities and is the global voice of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program Joint Center. The Editor of the Analyst solicits most articles and field reports, however authors may suggest topics for future issues or submit articles and field reports for consideration. Such articles and field reports cannot have been previously published in any form, must be written in English, and must correspond precisely to the format and style of articles and field reports published in The Analyst (www.cacianalyst.org) and described below.
    [Show full text]
  • 42417-033: Construction of Road Links of the Yerevan Western
    Initial Environmental Examination March 2015 ARM: Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program –Tranche 2 Construction of Road Links of the Yerevan Western Ring Road Prepared by the Yerevan Municipality for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA YEREVAN MUNICIPALITY CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD LINKS OF THE YEREVAN WESTERN RING ROAD Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program TRANCHE 2 Babajanyan–Ashtarak highway road link Initial Environmental Examination (Draft) Date Rev Drafted by Checked and compiled by Approved by 20/03/2015 V.4 Local experts P. BOURGUIGNON P. MEURISSE 1 0 1 5 E V 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 1 Consultant Funding Agency Implementing Agency Asian Development Bank VERSION HISTORY Version Date Modifications Draft 27/06/2014 First Issue Draft V2 16/07/2014 Following Ruzanna Voskanyan comments Draft V3 04/12/2014 As per ADB and Ruzanna Voskanyan comments Draft V4 20/03/2015 As per ADB and Ruzanna Voskanyan comments Sustainable Urban Development
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée Parlementaire
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Doc. 10027 12 January 2004 Honouring of obligations and commitments by Armenia Report Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe Rapporteurs: Mr René André, France, Group of the European People’s Party, and Mr Jerzy Jaskiernia, Poland, Socialist Group Summary 2003 has been a busy electoral year for Armenia and as a result no further progress has been made in the current reforms. Nevertheless, since September 2003, undeniable efforts by Armenian authorities are once more showing a real political will to making progress towards honouring obligations and commitments which Armenia entered into : it abolished the death penalty, adopted a new Criminal Code, adopted a law on the Ombudsman, created an alternative military and civilian service, adopted a law on the mass media and a law on freedom of information and revised the law on radio and television broadcasting, and honoured all its commitments with regard to conventions. However, the Monitoring Committee cannot but express its profound disappointment at the conduct of the presidential and parliamentary elections held in 2003 which gave rise to serious irregularities and massive fraud. The Monitoring Committee also expects further subs tantial progress as regards the functi oning of the judicial system and the independence of the judiciary, the situation in Armenian prisons and the conditions of detention, the misconduct of law enforcement officials , freedom of demonstration, the revision of the Administrative Code, the revision of the Electoral Code, media pluralism, increased local self-government, the fight against corruption, and the respect of religious freedom .
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Armenia Waste Quantity and Composition Study
    The Republic of Armenia Waste Quantity and Composition Study March 2020 Study by LL Bolagen Contents 1. Introduction and background 10 1.1 Armenia towards sustainable SWM 10 1.2 Main project objectives 10 1.3 Project methodology 11 1.4 General information on the Republic of Armenia 12 1.5 Previous studies on waste management 14 1.6 Waste statistics – a big challenge 16 2. Municipal waste 17 2.1 Definition 17 2.2 Existing situation and previous estimates 18 2.3 Guidelines and methodology for quantification of MSW 25 2.4 Guidelines and methodology for municipal waste composition analysis (WCA) 26 2.5 Approach and methodology of WCA in Armenia 29 2.6 Analysis of the test results in Yerevan and other cities 32 3. Bulky waste 40 3.1 Definition of bulky waste 40 3.2 Existing situation and data 40 3.3 Guidelines and methodology for bulky waste inventory 40 4. Construction and demolition waste 41 4.1 Definitions 41 4.2 Existing situation and data 41 4.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory of CDW 43 5. Automotive waste 44 5.1 Definition of automotive waste 44 5.2 Existing situation and data 45 5.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory 46 6. Industrial waste 47 6.1 Definition 47 6.2 Existing situation and data 47 6.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory 48 7. Electric and electronic waste (E-waste or WEEE) 49 7.1 Definitions 49 7.2 Existing situation and data 49 Republic of Armenia Page 2 of 136 Waste Quantity and Composition Study (March 2020) 7.3 Guidelines and methodology for WEEE inventory 49 8.
    [Show full text]
  • SPS Newsletter 10 EN Original
    Issue 10, January 2016 Schools’ Directors forge links with the Human Rights Commissioner th Editorial On the eve of the 4 Strasbourg World Forum As this is the last for Democracy (18-20 newsletter before I November 2015), the retire in March, my Directors of the Schools colleagues have kindly of Political Studies had allowed me to share the privilege to meet my thoughts on the with Mr Nils Muižnieks, Schools which it has Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, in order been my privilege to work with for over five years. I’ve to learn about his work and explore ways in which the worked at the Council of Europe for over twenty years Schools could work more closely with the and I can safely say that working with the Schools of Commissioner’s Office. Mr Muižnieks presented his Political Studies has been one of the most meaningful of current priorities and areas of concern which include all my missions I have been particularly impressed by . migration, asylum for refugees, surveillance laws and how Schools’ directors and participants, coming from gender equality – issues which are of high relevance to the such different parts of Europe, and now beyond too, School countries too. The meeting also offered an have been able to build links, especially between opportunity to discuss the challenging political contexts countries which are experiencing either frozen or, sadly, in which several Schools of the Network operate. thawing conflicts. SPS Network met in Berlin ‘In Search of I am aware that many Schools are operating in Lost Universalism’ conditions which may be very challenging, either for The Association of political or economic reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • AGBU Armenia Newsletter (July-August, 2011)
    ARMENIAN GENERAL BENEVOLENT UNION AGBUAGBU ARMENIAARMENIA NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER Yerevan, Armenia IN THIS ISSUE ISSUE 15, JULY-AUGUST, 2011 ♦ AGBU President Berge BERGE SETRAKIAN, PRESIDENT OF AGBU: Setrakian's interview to “L’Orient Le Jour” (p. 1, 2) “ERASING THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE GENOCIDE” ♦ “TUMO” center for creative Translator's Note: The following article was originally published in French by the Lebanese technologies opens in Yere- newspaper L'Orient Le Jour and translated by the AGBU Press Office. Published Wednes- van (p. 2, 3) day, July 6, 2011. Written by Maria Chakhtoura. ♦ FAF and AGBU announce —————————— the launch of “NUR” project "I am Lebanese to the in Nagorno Karabakh (p. 4) core, attached to the land where I was born, ♦ AGBU and AUA delegation where I grew up and visits Artsakh (p. 5) lived, and I have Arme- ♦ AGBU Yerevan Scouts par- nia as my heritage." ticipate in “Hayordiner” These are the words of scout camp of Artsakh (p. 5) Berge Setrakian, presi- dent of AGBU (Arme- ♦ 4th season of AGBU An- nian General Benevo- tranik Scout Camp (p. 6) lent Union), the world's ♦ AGBU “Discover Armenia” largest Armenian NGO brings another 31 youths to headquartered in New Armenia (p. 7) York. Our chance meeting, ♦ AGBU Yerevan Summer the result of a happy Intern Program 2011 (p. 8) AGBU President Berge Setrakian coincidence, took place ♦ AGBU Moscow Summer in a hotel in Yerevan. Berge Setrakian was visiting the Armenian capital to attend two Intern Program 2011 (p. 9) important meetings: the Special Commission of the centenary of the Armenian Genocide, and the annual meeting of the Board of Trustees of the "Hayastan" All-Armenian Fund.
    [Show full text]