DOCSLIB.ORG

42417-033: Construction of Road Links of the Yerevan Western

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
42417-033: Construction of Road Links of the Yerevan Western Initial Environmental Examination March 2015 ARM: Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program –Tranche 2 Construction of Road Links of the Yerevan Western Ring Road Prepared by the Yerevan Municipality for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA YEREVAN MUNICIPALITY CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD LINKS OF THE YEREVAN WESTERN RING ROAD Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program TRANCHE 2 Babajanyan–Ashtarak highway road link Initial Environmental Examination (Draft) Date Rev Drafted by Checked and compiled by Approved by 20/03/2015 V.4 Local experts P. BOURGUIGNON P. MEURISSE 1 0 1 5 E V 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 1 Consultant Funding Agency Implementing Agency Asian Development Bank VERSION HISTORY Version Date Modifications Draft 27/06/2014 First Issue Draft V2 16/07/2014 Following Ruzanna Voskanyan comments Draft V3 04/12/2014 As per ADB and Ruzanna Voskanyan comments Draft V4 20/03/2015 As per ADB and Ruzanna Voskanyan comments Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION Tranche 2 - Babajanyan–Ashtarak highway road link ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AM Accountability Mechanism AP Affected Person Engineer Construction Supervision Consultant EA Executing Agency EARF Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIEC ̏Environmental Impact Eбpertise Center” SNCO EMP Environmental Management Plan ERT Emergency Response Team ES Environmental Specialist GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism HSE Health, Safety & Environment IA Implementing Agency IEE Initial Environmental Examination IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF Multi-tranche Financing Facility MNP Ministry of Nature Protection MOC Ministry of Culture MOE Ministry of Economy MENR Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. MPC Maximum Permissible Concentration NGOs Non-government organizations NO Nitrogen oxide NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide PIU Project Implementing Unit RA Republic of Armenia RAMSAR Ramsar Convention on Wetlands REA Rapid Environmental Assessment (checklist) SEI State Environmental Inspectorate SEMP Site-Specific Environmental Management Plan SNCO State Non-commercial Organization SO2 Sulfur Dioxide SPS Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) SUDIP Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program TOR Terms of Reference UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization USD United States of America Dollar YMPIU Yerevan Municipality Project Implementation Unit YM Yerevan Municipality WEIGHTS AND MEASURES dBA Decibel (A-weighted) km Kilometer(s) 2 km Square kilometer(s) l Liter m Meter(s) 3 mg/m Milligram(s) per cubic meter Page 3 of 127 Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program Draft INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................. 6 A.1. Project Background ............................................................................................................................. 6 A.2. Screening and Classification ............................................................................................................... 6 A.3. Compliance and Fulfillment of the SPS Policy & Republic of Armenia (RA) Law on EIA ................... 6 A.4. Grievance Redress Mechanism .......................................................................................................... 7 A.5. Report, Methodology and Scope of the Study ..................................................................................... 7 A.6. Tasks and Accomplishments .............................................................................................................. 8 B. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 10 B.1. ADB Environmental Assessment Requirements ............................................................................... 10 B.2. Armenian Laws Governing Environmental Management and Assessment...................................... 10 B.3. Armenia’s Participation in International Environmental Conventions and Protocols ........................ 12 B.4. Administrative Framework................................................................................................................. 13 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................................ 18 C.1. Type of Project .................................................................................................................................. 18 C.2. Location of the Project ...................................................................................................................... 18 C.3. Description of the Works ................................................................................................................... 21 C.4. Magnitude of Operation .................................................................................................................... 21 C.5. Screening and Classification ............................................................................................................. 21 D. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT (BASELINE DATA) ............................................................................... 22 D.1. Physical Resources ........................................................................................................................... 22 D.2. Ecological Resources ........................................................................................................................ 26 D.3. Social and Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................... 28 D.4. Economic Development .................................................................................................................... 29 E. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................ 30 E.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 30 E.2. Positive impacts ................................................................................................................................ 30 E.3. Negative impacts and mitigation measures during construction phase............................................ 31 E.4. Negative impacts and mitigation measures during operation phase ................................................ 36 E.5. Cumulative Environmental Effects ..................................................................................................... 36 F. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................................. 38 G. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, PUBLIC COMMUNICATION, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION...... 39 G.1. Information Disclosure ....................................................................................................................... 39 G.2. Consultation and Participation .......................................................................................................... 39 H. ACCOUNTABILITY & GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .............................................................................. 42 H.1. ADB’s Accountabilitв Mechanism ..................................................................................................... 42 H.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism ........................................................................................................ 42 I. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................... 46 I.1. Mitigation ........................................................................................................................................... 46 I.2. Monitoring ......................................................................................................................................... 52 I.3. Implementation arrangement ............................................................................................................ 52 I.4. Costs and sources of funding ........................................................................................................... 54 I.5. Reporting ........................................................................................................................................... 55 J. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 56 J.1. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Results of the Herpetological Trips to Northern Cyprus
    North-Western Journal of Zoology Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008, pp.139-149 [Online: Vol.4, 2008: 16] Results of the Herpetological Trips to Northern Cyprus Bayram GÖÇMEN1,*, Nazım KAŞOT1, Mehmet Zülfü YILDIZ1,2, Istvan SAS3, Bahadır AKMAN1, Deniz YALÇINKAYA1, Salih GÜCEL4 1. Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zoology Section, Tr 35100 Bornova, Izmir-Turkey 2. Harran University, Faculty of Art-Science, Department of Biology, Zoology Section, Osmanbey Campus, Sanliurfa-Turkey 3. University of Oradea, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Universităţii St. 1, Oradea 410087, Romania 4. Near East University, Environmental Sciences Institute, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus * Corresponding author: Bayram GÖÇMEN, E-mail: [email protected], Tel: 0 (232) 388 40 00/1795, Fax: 0 (232) 388 18 91 Abstract. During the three trips conducted to Northern Cyprus in 2007, we found that three frog and toad species (Anura), 11 lizards (Lacertilia), 3 turtles (Testudinata) and 9 snakes (Ophidia) inhabit the northern part of the Cyprus Island. The distributions of a total of 26 reptile and amphibian species were observed and some ecological information on their biotopes was summarized, and the taxonomic states of some of the species determined discussed. Key Words: Northern Cyprus, herpetofauna, snakes, lizards Cyprus, with 9251 km2 area, is the part of the island has a mountain chain third largest island after Sicily and which is called Pentadactylos, made of Sardinia in the Mediterranean Sea. It is mesozoic calcareous rocks, runs in east- located in 34o33’-35o42’ northern latitudes west direction and has the highest point and 32o16’-34o36’ eastern longitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amphibians and Reptiles of Cyprus Cyprus.Qxd 11/14/09 1:12 PM Page 2
    Baier et al Cover_03.11.2009.qxd 17.11.2009 15:04 Seite 1 Felix Sebastian Baier. Felix Baier Born 1987 in Heidelberg, Germany. Travelling to Cyprus since his early childhood and deeply fascinated by living David J. Sparrow things, he has long been interested in the island’s nature, Hans-Jörg Wiedl especially in reptiles and amphibians. On the basis of intensive zoological reading, he conducted his first field studies while still at school. Civil service at the Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg (Frankfurt/M.) gave him the chance to bring further ideas to fruition. Since 2008, he has been studying biology and philosophy at The Amphibians the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich. David J. Sparrow. and Reptiles of Cyprus Born in 1946 in the UK. Dr. David Sparrow is a Singapore-based photographer. He gained BSc (Hons) (1964) and PhD (1970) degrees in chemistry from the University of Birmingham, England. He worked in the chemical industry for 34 years during which time he co- authored, edited, reviewed and refereed numerous sci- entific articles, papers and books. He has had a lifetime fascination with snakes, and this project gave him the opportunity to combine this interest with his passion The Amphibians of Cyprus and Reptiles for photography. Hans-Jörg Wiedl (“Snake George”). Born 1943 in Innsbruck (Austria), he grew up in the wilderness of Häselgehr in the Lechtal (Tirol), now a National Park. As an UN peacekeeper in Cyprus in 1973/1974, he developed his deep concern for the conservation of the herpetofauna of Cyprus. In 1986, he moved permanently to Cyprus, and established the “Snake George Reptile Park” in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles of the Mediterranean Basin
    Chapter 9 Amphibians and Reptiles of the Mediterranean Basin Kerim Çiçek and Oğzukan Cumhuriyet Kerim Çiçek and Oğzukan Cumhuriyet Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70357 Abstract The Mediterranean basin is one of the most geologically, biologically, and culturally complex region and the only case of a large sea surrounded by three continents. The chapter is focused on a diversity of Mediterranean amphibians and reptiles, discussing major threats to the species and its conservation status. There are 117 amphibians, of which 80 (68%) are endemic and 398 reptiles, of which 216 (54%) are endemic distributed throughout the Basin. While the species diversity increases in the north and west for amphibians, the reptile diversity increases from north to south and from west to east direction. Amphibians are almost twice as threatened (29%) as reptiles (14%). Habitat loss and degradation, pollution, invasive/alien species, unsustainable use, and persecution are major threats to the species. The important conservation actions should be directed to sustainable management measures and legal protection of endangered species and their habitats, all for the future of Mediterranean biodiversity. Keywords: amphibians, conservation, Mediterranean basin, reptiles, threatened species 1. Introduction The Mediterranean basin is one of the most geologically, biologically, and culturally complex region and the only case of a large sea surrounded by Europe, Asia and Africa. The Basin was shaped by the collision of the northward-moving African-Arabian continental plate with the Eurasian continental plate which occurred on a wide range of scales and time in the course of the past 250 mya [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Herpetofauna of the Island of Rhodes (Dodecanese, Greece)
    HERPETOZOA 21 (3/4): 147 - 169 147 Wien, 30. Jänner 2009 The herpetofauna of the Island of Rhodes (Dodecanese, Greece) Die Herpetofauna der Insel Rhodos (Dodekanes, Griechenland) THOMAS BADER & CHRISTOPH RIEGLER & HEINZ GRILLITSCH KURZFASSUNG Die Herpetofauna von Rhodos wird aufgrund von Literaturdaten, Sammlungsmaterial des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien sowie Ergebnissen diverser herpetologischer Exkursionen aufgelistet. Verbreitungskarten aller nachgewiesenen Arten sowie eine aktuelle herpetologische Faunenliste werden erstellt. Folgende Arten wurden regelmäßig und wiederholt festgestellt: Bufo viridis, Hyla arborea, Pelophylax cerigensis, Mauremys rivulata, Hemidactylus turcicus, Laudakia stellio, Ophisops elegans, Lacerta trilineata, Anatolacerta oertzeni, Ablepharus kitaibelii, Chalcides ocellatus, Trachylepis aurata, Blanus strauchi, Typhlops vermicularis, Dolichophis sp., Platyceps najadum, Hemorrhois nummifer, Zamenis situla, Natrix natrix, Telescopus fallax. Der taxonomische Status der Springnatter wird diskutiert. Aufgrund mehrerer aktueller Funde wird Mediodactylus kotschyi ergän- zend zur Herpetofauna von Rhodos hinzugefügt und das Auftreten folgender Arten, deren Vorkommen in der Literatur regelmäßig für Rhodos angegeben wurde, in Frage gestellt: Testudo graeca, Pseudopus apodus, Natrix tessellata. Aktuelle Einzelfunde gelangen von Chamaeleo chamaeleon, Malpolon monspessulanus, Testudo grae- ca und Testudo hermanni, deren Status diskutiert wird. ABSTRACT Based on several recent herpetological surveys, as well as data from
    [Show full text]
  • 185 M. S. Arakelyan, F. D. Danielyan, C. Corti, R
    Book Review M. S. Arakelyan, F. D. Danielyan, C. Corti, R. Sin- lar, part of the “Habitats in Armenia” is a useful overview daco & A. E. Leviton (2011): Herpetofauna of Armenia of the landscape and the herpetofauna that inhabits it. Also and Nagorno-Karabakh. – Society for the Study of Am- in this section, information is presented on the propor- phibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake City, USA, 154 pp., ISBN tional habitat occupancy of the Armenian territory, habi- 0916984842 / 9780916984847. tat characteristics, occurrence depending on altitude, and a link to the photos at the end of the book that illustrate At the end of 2011, the American Society for the Study of these habitats. In addition, the authors report on individ- Amphibians and Reptiles announced a new publication ual habitats and their most abundant herpetofauna. At the dedicated to a herpetological area that is part of one of the end of the chapter is a list of the species of amphibians and 25 biologically richest places in the world generally known reptiles found in the two areas. We learn that Armenia is as “Biodiversity Hotspots” – Armenia and the adjacent re- herpetological richer, and that only one species (Trapelus gion known as Nagorno-Karabakh. It is not the first book lessonae) occurs in Nagorno-Karabakh but not in Arme- published under the auspices of SSAR that is dedicated to nia. The following section is devoted to palaeontology and the Middle East, though, and was preceded by Snakes of the fossil record of amphibians and reptiles of Armenia. It Iran (1991), The Lizards of Iran (1999), and Gecko Fauna is followed by a historical overview of herpetological study of the USSR and Contiguous Regions (1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the Activities of the Human Rights Defender in 2006
    ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 The present "Annual Report for 2006 on Activities of the Republic of Armenia's Human Rights Defender" has been translated and published with the financial support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) ISBN 978-99941-0-213-6 ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 Yerevan, 2007 Yerevan 2007 RA Human Rights Defender A. Harutyunyan In the result of constitutional amendments, Human Rights Defender's Office was mandated as a constitutional institution. On February 17, 2005, National Assembly of RA by the votes of more than 3/5 of the total num- ber of deputies elected Doctor of Law, Professor Armen Harutyunyan as a first parliamentary Human Rights Defender of RA. Human Rights Defender is an independent official, whose main mission is to prevent and restore human rights and fundamental freedoms violated by the state and local self-governing bodies or their officials. The letters of complaint, addressed to the Defender, are various and concern almost all spheres of functioning of state and local self-governing bodies. The actuality of the report is determined also by the circumstance that for the first time are sep- arated the analysis of the statutory- legal act that leads to the human rights violations and the analysis of detached provisions, as well as the shortcoming in law enforcement practices. This report aims to raise a list of questions that are peculiar to the post soviet countries and exist in our country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment Chapter 6
    Chapter 6 Risk Assessment Chapter 6 Risk Assessment 6.1 Damage of Buildings The building damage functions for multi-story residential buildings, for low-rise individual houses and for schools and hospitals are made mainly based on the damage by Spitak earthquake in 1988. Therefore, the seismic resistance of the buildings in 1988 is considered tacitly in creating the damage function; however, already over 20 years has passed from 1988. Most building in Yerevan has been constructed before 1991 and the aging effect to the seismic resistance of the buildings is a matter of concern. Also the maintenance of the residential buildings after 1991 is said to became poor than before. The effects of these issues are necessary to be included for realistic risk assessment. The quantitative effects are evaluated by expert judgment in discussing with Armenian researchers and concluded that the damage ratio is increased 10% for aging effect and 10% for poor maintenance issue. As a result, the damage functions in Figures 5.3-17, 5.3-19 and 5.3-20 are multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the damage of buildings. 6.1.1 Multi-story residential buildings Number of heavily damaged multi-story residential buildings per grid of 250m x 250m against two scenario earthquakes is shown in Figure 6.1-1. 6.1.2 Individual house Number of heavily damaged individual houses per grid of 250m x 250m is shown in Figure 6.1-2. 6.1.3 Summary of damage of buildings 1) Damages of multi-story buildings and individual houses at each district are summarized in Table 6.1-1.
    [Show full text]
  • On Development of Yerevan Metro to Ajapnyak District
    ON DEVELOPMENT OF YEREVAN METRO TO AJAPNYAK DISTRICT Background and Brief information about Yerevan Metro The construction of the Yerevan metro began since 1972. Geological research has revealed that the static groundwater level is at a depth of 9 meters above the ground. This meant that the tunnel structures of the metro had to be installed in the most saturated parts of the groundwater. Under conditions of unprecedented infiltration of water drilling was impossible, which inevitably led to an artificial lowering of the groundwater level. This process was carried out by digging shafts up to 58 meters deep from the surface of the tunnels along the proposed route, high-efficiency deep pumps were installed in them (approximately 220 m 3 / hour), which continuously lowered the water level for 24 hours, somehow creating an opportunity to drill tunnels. The total number of exploration and labor shafts was more than 100, however, it was not possible to lower the water level below the lower level of the tunnel under construction, and to make a free drilling. Due to the difficult hydrogeological conditions of Yerevan, subsoil did not allow to make drilling without expelling huge amounts of accumulated water to the surface. Except the many water supply pumps, pumping stations were built and installed in the tunnels, which together pump 10-12 thousand cubic meters of water per hour. Under these conditions, it was impossible to provide high performance or high- speed tunnel crossing. It was impossible to drill or fasten more than one meter per day from each crossing point. Tunnel workers from different cities of the Soviet Union, who drilled 10 meters more every day in their cities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia
    Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. GE JR Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. 12-181 Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Structure of Volume of Final Report Vol. Title Language Armenian I Summary English Japanese Armenian Main Report 1 II English Risk Assessment of Yerevan City Japanese Armenian Main Report 2 III English Yerevan Earthquake Disaster Management Plan Japanese Armenian IV Data Book English Exchange rate used in this report 1.00 US Dollar (US$) = 407.43 Armenia Drams (AMD) 1.00 Japanese Yen (JPY) = 5.19 Armenia Drams (AMD) (as of October 8, 2012) Outline of the Project Outline of the Project 1. Background Title: The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Counterpart Agency: Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) Project Period: August 2010 - December 2012 The goal of this project is “Reduction of Disasters due to a large scale earthquake which has a possibility of occurrence in Yerevan City”.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Distribution and Ecology of the Snakes of Jordan
    Vertebrate Zoology 61 (2) 2011 179 179 – 266 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1864-5755, 25.10.2011 Systematics, distribution and ecology of the snakes of Jordan ZUHAIR S. AMR 1 & AHMAD M. DISI 2 1 Department of Biology, Jordan University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 11112, Jordan. amrz(at)just.edu.jo 2 Department of Biology, the University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan. ahmadmdisi(at)yahoo.com Accepted on June 18, 2011. Published online at www.vertebrate-zoology.de on June 22, 2011. > Abstract The present study consists of both locality records and of literary data for 37 species and subspecies of snakes reported from Jordan. Within the past decade snake taxonomy was re-evaluated employing molecular techniques that resulted in reconsideration of several taxa. Thus, it is imperative now to revise the taxonomic status of snakes in Jordan to update workers in Jordan and the surrounding countries with these nomenclatural changes. The snake fauna of Jordan consists of 37 species and subspecies belonging to seven families (Typhlopidae, Leptotyphlopidae, Boidae, Colubridae, Atractaspididae, Elapidae and Viperidae). Families Leptotyphlopidae, Boidae and Elapidae are represented by a single species each, Leptotyphlops macrorhynchus, Eryx jaculus and Walterinnesia aegyptia respectively. The families Typhlopidae and Atractaspididae are represented by two and three species respectively. Species of the former genus Coluber were updated and the newly adopted names are included. Family Colubridae is represented by twelve genera (Dolichophis, Eirenis, Hemorrhois, Lytorhynchus, Malpolon, Natrix, Platyceps, Psammophis, Rhagerhis, Rhynchocalamus, Spalerosophis and Telescopus) and includes 24 species. Family Viperidae includes fi ve genera (Cerastes, Daboia, Echis, Macrovipera and Pseudocerastes), each of which is represented by a single species, except the genus Cerastes which is represented by two subspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Species List of the European Herpetofauna – 2020 Update by the Taxonomic Committee of the Societas Europaea Herpetologi
    Amphibia-Reptilia 41 (2020): 139-189 brill.com/amre Review Species list of the European herpetofauna – 2020 update by the Taxonomic Committee of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica Jeroen Speybroeck1,∗, Wouter Beukema2, Christophe Dufresnes3, Uwe Fritz4, Daniel Jablonski5, Petros Lymberakis6, Iñigo Martínez-Solano7, Edoardo Razzetti8, Melita Vamberger4, Miguel Vences9, Judit Vörös10, Pierre-André Crochet11 Abstract. The last species list of the European herpetofauna was published by Speybroeck, Beukema and Crochet (2010). In the meantime, ongoing research led to numerous taxonomic changes, including the discovery of new species-level lineages as well as reclassifications at genus level, requiring significant changes to this list. As of 2019, a new Taxonomic Committee was established as an official entity within the European Herpetological Society, Societas Europaea Herpetologica (SEH). Twelve members from nine European countries reviewed, discussed and voted on recent taxonomic research on a case-by-case basis. Accepted changes led to critical compilation of a new species list, which is hereby presented and discussed. According to our list, 301 species (95 amphibians, 15 chelonians, including six species of sea turtles, and 191 squamates) occur within our expanded geographical definition of Europe. The list includes 14 non-native species (three amphibians, one chelonian, and ten squamates). Keywords: Amphibia, amphibians, Europe, reptiles, Reptilia, taxonomy, updated species list. Introduction 1 - Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Havenlaan 88 Speybroeck, Beukema and Crochet (2010) bus 73, 1000 Brussel, Belgium (SBC2010, hereafter) provided an annotated 2 - Wildlife Health Ghent, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, species list for the European amphibians and Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium non-avian reptiles.
    [Show full text]