The Republic of Armenia Waste Quantity and Composition Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Republic of Armenia Waste Quantity and Composition Study The Republic of Armenia Waste Quantity and Composition Study March 2020 Study by LL Bolagen Contents 1. Introduction and background 10 1.1 Armenia towards sustainable SWM 10 1.2 Main project objectives 10 1.3 Project methodology 11 1.4 General information on the Republic of Armenia 12 1.5 Previous studies on waste management 14 1.6 Waste statistics – a big challenge 16 2. Municipal waste 17 2.1 Definition 17 2.2 Existing situation and previous estimates 18 2.3 Guidelines and methodology for quantification of MSW 25 2.4 Guidelines and methodology for municipal waste composition analysis (WCA) 26 2.5 Approach and methodology of WCA in Armenia 29 2.6 Analysis of the test results in Yerevan and other cities 32 3. Bulky waste 40 3.1 Definition of bulky waste 40 3.2 Existing situation and data 40 3.3 Guidelines and methodology for bulky waste inventory 40 4. Construction and demolition waste 41 4.1 Definitions 41 4.2 Existing situation and data 41 4.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory of CDW 43 5. Automotive waste 44 5.1 Definition of automotive waste 44 5.2 Existing situation and data 45 5.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory 46 6. Industrial waste 47 6.1 Definition 47 6.2 Existing situation and data 47 6.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory 48 7. Electric and electronic waste (E-waste or WEEE) 49 7.1 Definitions 49 7.2 Existing situation and data 49 Republic of Armenia Page 2 of 136 Waste Quantity and Composition Study (March 2020) 7.3 Guidelines and methodology for WEEE inventory 49 8. Healthcare waste 50 8.1 Definitions 50 8.2 Existing situation and data 50 8.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory 52 9. Other hazardous waste 52 9.1 Definition 52 9.2 Existing situation and data 52 9.3 Guidelines and methodology for waste inventory 53 10. Agricultural and horticultural waste 53 10.1 Definition of agricultural waste 53 10.2 Existing situation and data 54 10.3 Guidelines and methodology for agricultural waste inventory 54 11. Landfills and dumpsites 55 11.1 Definitions 55 11.2 Field visits undertaken 57 11.3 Assessment of the existing situation 60 12. Business models 60 12.1 General 60 12.2 Municipal companies 61 12.3 Municipal jointly owned companies 61 12.4 Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) 61 13. Recommendations and action plan for improvement of waste management 62 13.1 Introduction 62 13.2 Municipal waste collection 62 13.3 Reuse and recycling 65 13.4 Bulky waste 68 13.5 Construction and demolition waste 69 13.6 Automotive waste 73 13.7 Industrial waste 74 13.8 E-waste 74 13.9 Healthcare waste 75 13.10 Other hazardous waste 76 13.11 Agricultural waste 77 13.12 Treatment of organic waste 78 13.13 Landfilling 81 13.14 Business models 84 Republic of Armenia Page 3 of 136 Waste Quantity and Composition Study (March 2020) 13.15 Institutional and organizational aspects 85 13.16 Capacity development 86 13.17 Socio-economic and environmental risks 88 14. Final conclusions and the way forward 90 APPENDICES Appendix 1 - WASTE COMPOSTION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 93 Appendix 2 - WASTE COMPOSTION ANALYSIS TESTS IN YEREVAN 108 Appendix 3 - WASTE COMPOSTION ANALYSIS TESTS IN 5 CITIES 113 Appendix 4 - SUMMARY OF ALL WASTE COMPOSTION ANALYSIS TESTS 126 Appendix 5 - DESCRIPTION OF MANUAL SORTING TESTS OF MSW IN YEREVAN 127 Republic of Armenia Page 4 of 136 Waste Quantity and Composition Study (March 2020) Definitions and abbreviations AMD Armenian dram AUA American University of Armenia BAT best available technology CDM Clean Development Mechanism CDW construction and demolition waste CH4 methane gas CO2 carbon dioxide EEE see WEEE ELV End-of-Life vehicles, scrap vehicles EU European Union e-waste See WEEE FLW food loss and waste GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG greenhouse gas, contributing to global warming HCW healthcare waste HZW hazardous waste kton 1,000 ton marz Armenian province (with the province council marzpetaran) MTAI Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure MSW Municipal solid waste PET polyethylene terephthalate, light-weight plastic commonly used for liquid bottles PPP Public Private Partnership RA Republic of Armenia SWM Solid waste management t or ton metric ton (tonne), i.e. 1,000 kg USD US dollars WB World Bank WCA Waste Composition Analysis WEEE Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Citing this report LL Bolagen. (2020). The Republic of Armenia Waste Quantity and Composition Study. Yerevan: AUA Acopian Center for the Environment and AUA Manoogian-Simone Research Fund, American University of Armenia. Project website https://ace.aua.am/waste/wqcs Republic of Armenia Page 5 of 136 Waste Quantity and Composition Study (March 2020) Acknowledgement The Consultant Team wishes to express its appreciation to the Client for the constructive and close cooperation that has characterized this Project throughout, and particularly to the Director Mr. Alen Amirkhanian and the Project Manager Mr. Harutyun Alpetyan of the American University of Armenia (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment, as well as the Government of Armenia through Ms. Narine Avetyan, Head of Territorial Investment Policy and Infrastructure Development Department, and Mr. Davit Shindyan, SWM Expert at the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure (MTAI). The Project has also been supervised and supported by the Interagency Working Group Coordinating Country’s Waste Management Activities, formerly headed by Mr. Arsen Gasparyan, then advisor to the Prime Minister of Armenia. The Project Team has been blessed with the participation of a very skilled local team for the Waste Composition Analysis (WCA) headed by Mr. Artak Khachatryan, Ministry of Environment for the part on sorting and analysis, and Mr. Argishti Tigranyan and Mr. Hrach Sargsyan for the waste sample collection. The WCA team also included Mr. Andranik Khachatryan, Mr. Dmitry Sholev and Mr. Gegham Muradyan. The tests in Yerevan have been greatly supported by the new municipal company “Yerevan Waste Removal and Sanitary Cleaning”, including its acting director Mr. Armen Grigoryan, drivers, and waste collection crew. The Project Team is grateful to all other stakeholders - staff at ministries, municipalities, commercial entities, hospitals and clinics, etc. with whom we have had the pleasure to discuss solid waste management in Armenia. The project was financed by the AUA Manoogian-Simone Research Fund (MSRF), which is an innovative funding opportunity aimed at building university research capacity in Armenia to advance economic growth and development of the country based on Government priorities. This report has been developed by the Swedish consulting firm LL Miljökonsult, part of the company group LL Bolagen, which carries out waste collection services and sanitary cleaning in Stockholm, Sweden. The consulting team consisted of Ms. Karin Eberle, TL/SWM Specialist, Mr. Anders Lärkert, SWM Specialist and Ms. Ingrid Håstad SWM Specialist. Figure 1. The WCA team, preparing for sampling and sorting at Nubarashen landfill Republic of Armenia Page 6 of 136 Waste Quantity and Composition Study (March 2020) Executive summary Armenia has struggled for a long time with unsustainable solid waste management practices such as uncontrolled dumpsites and inefficient waste collection, resulting in negative environmental and health impacts and poor management of resources. Now, the new Armenian government is aiming at achieving EU-approximation within the framework of the EU-Armenia Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and to contribute to Armenia’s commitment to the Sustainability Goals (SDGs) within the Agenda 2030. This includes sustainable and long-term strategic waste management, and some large infrastructure projects on sanitary landfills and capacity development are underway. The need for more reliable data on the quality and quantity of waste in Armenia has been recognized to support the development of a policy and road map on solid waste management based on the principles of circular economy as well as information to potential investors in waste collection, recycling, and energy recovery. In order to support that work, this project “Waste Quantity and Composition Study (WQCS)” has been initiated by the American University of Armenia (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment in partnership with the Government of Armenia. The study is funded by the AUA Manoogian-Simone Research Fund and has involved a team of three Swedish consultants working closely with the AUA and the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure (MTAI) from May to September 2019. • Three Waste Composition Analyses (WCA) of municipal waste have been carried out in Yerevan as well as training of a local WCA team. The team has continued to carry out 12 more WCA in Ararat, Gyumri, Hrazdan, Kapan and Vanadzor. • Data have been collected through field visits to Armenian cities, landfills, hospitals and other sites, and interviews with stakeholders. • Two workshops – on Hazardous waste and WEEE, and Strategic Waste Management – have been carried out. The latter included a presentation of the WCA results and preliminary findings. The WCA methodology included sorting municipal solid waste into 22 waste fractions by hand from samples taken from residential and commercial areas. Every test included collecting ca 50 bins or up to 4 tons with a truck, mixing the waste and taking out 5 sub-samples amounting to a total of 500 kg. Some of the main findings and recommendations from the WCA are the following: • Over 50% (weight) of the MSW is organic (kitchen and garden waste) and should not be landfilled to avoid spontaneous gas fires and methane emissions but tapped as a resource. • There is basically no newspaper and the amount of paper and cardboard varies from 2-ca 10%. Plastic packaging is more dominant, especially soft plastics up to 20% in Yerevan. The material is of poor quality as it is soiled, so recycling will require segregation at source.
Recommended publications
  • General Overview of the Local Self
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN ARMENIA: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ARPINE VARDANYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA MAY 2014 SIGNATURE PAGE Faculty Advisor: Arthur Drampian Date Dean: Douglas Shumavon Date American University of Armenia May 2014 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM STATEMENT AND METHODOLOGY ............................................ 6 BACKGROUND AND OUTLINE OF THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 6 HYPOTHESES ........................................................................................................................... 9 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ... 19 3.1. ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL DIVISION AND GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY ........................................................................................ 19 3.2. CURRENT ISSUES IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ..................... 20 3.3. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS IN ARMENIA ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the Activities of the Human Rights Defender in 2006
    ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 The present "Annual Report for 2006 on Activities of the Republic of Armenia's Human Rights Defender" has been translated and published with the financial support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) ISBN 978-99941-0-213-6 ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 Yerevan, 2007 Yerevan 2007 RA Human Rights Defender A. Harutyunyan In the result of constitutional amendments, Human Rights Defender's Office was mandated as a constitutional institution. On February 17, 2005, National Assembly of RA by the votes of more than 3/5 of the total num- ber of deputies elected Doctor of Law, Professor Armen Harutyunyan as a first parliamentary Human Rights Defender of RA. Human Rights Defender is an independent official, whose main mission is to prevent and restore human rights and fundamental freedoms violated by the state and local self-governing bodies or their officials. The letters of complaint, addressed to the Defender, are various and concern almost all spheres of functioning of state and local self-governing bodies. The actuality of the report is determined also by the circumstance that for the first time are sep- arated the analysis of the statutory- legal act that leads to the human rights violations and the analysis of detached provisions, as well as the shortcoming in law enforcement practices. This report aims to raise a list of questions that are peculiar to the post soviet countries and exist in our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 2Nd National Energy Efficiency Action Plan For
    DRAFT 2ND NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACTION PLAN FOR THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Renewable Resources and Energy Efficiency Fund World Bank / Global Environmental Facility Government of Armenia Astghine Pasoyan, Team Leader 8,000 7,708 TPES TFEC Energy Efficiency – why care? 7,000 ktoe 6,475 • 2/3 of all energy resources imported 6,000 • Emerging supply gap: 5,000 4,681 4,139 • 4,000 3,518 Demand grew and forecasted to grow further, 3,286 3,378 2,991 2,977 2,738 existing supply capacities insufficient to meet the 3,000 2,512 2,134 2,106 growing demand 2,015 1,901 1,964 1,858 1,858 1,905 1,998 2,000 1,714 • Future demand supplied by aging capacities to 1,107 require 2-3 times more TPES 1,000 - • Energy price hike in the last decade 1990 2000 2005 2010 2011 2012 2014 2015 2017 2018 2020 poses affordability and competitiveness 300% Energy price increases: Gas & Electricity 251% 251% 251% problems 250% Day-time electricity Tariff 208% 208% 208% 206% 206% • Electricity price rose by 94-112% Night-time electricity tariff 206% 200% Retail Gas Tariff 172% 159% 159% • Natural gas price rose by 200-250% 159% Wholesale gas tariff • 150% 112% Armenia’s economic indicators dragging: 112% 94% 94% 94% 88% 87% • Global competitiveness index dropped from 117 100% 86% 67% 65% 65% to 85 during 2013-14 (WEF) 52% 50% 33% 33% 33% 33% 27% 20% 20% 20% 20% • GDP growth dropped from 7.2% to 3.4% during 16% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2012-14 (WB) 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Why is Energy Efficiency Important for Armenia? create conditions for economic growth while improving Energy Efficiency can: the country’s energy security.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment Chapter 6
    Chapter 6 Risk Assessment Chapter 6 Risk Assessment 6.1 Damage of Buildings The building damage functions for multi-story residential buildings, for low-rise individual houses and for schools and hospitals are made mainly based on the damage by Spitak earthquake in 1988. Therefore, the seismic resistance of the buildings in 1988 is considered tacitly in creating the damage function; however, already over 20 years has passed from 1988. Most building in Yerevan has been constructed before 1991 and the aging effect to the seismic resistance of the buildings is a matter of concern. Also the maintenance of the residential buildings after 1991 is said to became poor than before. The effects of these issues are necessary to be included for realistic risk assessment. The quantitative effects are evaluated by expert judgment in discussing with Armenian researchers and concluded that the damage ratio is increased 10% for aging effect and 10% for poor maintenance issue. As a result, the damage functions in Figures 5.3-17, 5.3-19 and 5.3-20 are multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the damage of buildings. 6.1.1 Multi-story residential buildings Number of heavily damaged multi-story residential buildings per grid of 250m x 250m against two scenario earthquakes is shown in Figure 6.1-1. 6.1.2 Individual house Number of heavily damaged individual houses per grid of 250m x 250m is shown in Figure 6.1-2. 6.1.3 Summary of damage of buildings 1) Damages of multi-story buildings and individual houses at each district are summarized in Table 6.1-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transdisciplinary Research for Tourism Development in The
    ARMENIAN STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY After khachatur abovyan Transdisciplinary Research for Tourism Development in the Caucasus Region student field practice | case study 20‐30 June, Armenia Sequence of steps Group studies and interconnection Others Non‐governmental organizations Municipality Investors State agencies Stakeholders Community service sector representatives Community residents Local businessmen Tourism in adjacent areas and Meghradzor community Tsaghkadzor city known for being a ski resort, with forests and an ancient monastery. In the summer, people go there to get away from the city life of Yerevan, and the heat, for the fresh air in the mountains. In the winter, the town is completely overtaken by skiers and people who just want to relax and enjoy the snow and scenery. Having a good infrastructure and great reputation, Tsakhkadzor is a stronger "pole" and "hinders" the entry of tourists into the Marmarik valley and the Meghrayor community. From this point of view, serious steps must be taken to improve the infrastructure of the community and to create tourist information centers. That is why the groups were also oriented towards awareness raising events. The Meghradzor community is located in the valley of Marmarik, famous for its marvelous nature, the Marmarik River, oak, maple and wild pear forests, excellent climatic conditions, Marmarik reservoir, mineral water sources and hospitable residents. There you can see three landscape zones, mountain steppe, mountain forest and mountain meadows. Fieldwork studies have shown
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes in Upper Hrazdan Pilot River Basin of Armenia
    INTRODUCTION OF PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SCHEMES IN UPPER HRAZDAN PILOT RIVER BASIN OF ARMENIA Prepared by: "Geoinfo" LTD October, 2011 Yerevan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IN RUSSIAN........................................................................................... 5 1. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1. Documents Studied .............................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Definitions........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3. Categories of PES Services and Types of PES Schemes .................................................. 10 1.4. Valuation of Ecosystem Services........................................................................................ 11 1.5. Process in PES Establishment ........................................................................................... 12 1.6. Examples............................................................................................................................ 13 2. SELECTION OF PILOT RIVER BASIN .................................................................................... 16 2.1. Principles of selecting river basin........................................................................................ 16 3. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On Development of Yerevan Metro to Ajapnyak District
    ON DEVELOPMENT OF YEREVAN METRO TO AJAPNYAK DISTRICT Background and Brief information about Yerevan Metro The construction of the Yerevan metro began since 1972. Geological research has revealed that the static groundwater level is at a depth of 9 meters above the ground. This meant that the tunnel structures of the metro had to be installed in the most saturated parts of the groundwater. Under conditions of unprecedented infiltration of water drilling was impossible, which inevitably led to an artificial lowering of the groundwater level. This process was carried out by digging shafts up to 58 meters deep from the surface of the tunnels along the proposed route, high-efficiency deep pumps were installed in them (approximately 220 m 3 / hour), which continuously lowered the water level for 24 hours, somehow creating an opportunity to drill tunnels. The total number of exploration and labor shafts was more than 100, however, it was not possible to lower the water level below the lower level of the tunnel under construction, and to make a free drilling. Due to the difficult hydrogeological conditions of Yerevan, subsoil did not allow to make drilling without expelling huge amounts of accumulated water to the surface. Except the many water supply pumps, pumping stations were built and installed in the tunnels, which together pump 10-12 thousand cubic meters of water per hour. Under these conditions, it was impossible to provide high performance or high- speed tunnel crossing. It was impossible to drill or fasten more than one meter per day from each crossing point. Tunnel workers from different cities of the Soviet Union, who drilled 10 meters more every day in their cities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia
    Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. GE JR Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. 12-181 Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Structure of Volume of Final Report Vol. Title Language Armenian I Summary English Japanese Armenian Main Report 1 II English Risk Assessment of Yerevan City Japanese Armenian Main Report 2 III English Yerevan Earthquake Disaster Management Plan Japanese Armenian IV Data Book English Exchange rate used in this report 1.00 US Dollar (US$) = 407.43 Armenia Drams (AMD) 1.00 Japanese Yen (JPY) = 5.19 Armenia Drams (AMD) (as of October 8, 2012) Outline of the Project Outline of the Project 1. Background Title: The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Counterpart Agency: Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) Project Period: August 2010 - December 2012 The goal of this project is “Reduction of Disasters due to a large scale earthquake which has a possibility of occurrence in Yerevan City”.
    [Show full text]
  • SHIRAK Region (Shiraki Marz)
    R TSAGHKADZO Travel Guide® – Special Edition Lori Marz: page 2 of 23 - TourArmenia © 2007 Rick Ney ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - www.TACentral.com Travel Guide® – Special Edition Lori Marz: page 3 of 23 - TourArmenia © 2007 Rick Ney ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - www.TACentral.com Travel Guide® – Special Edition Tsaghkuniats Dzor, Tsakhnots and till 1949 The village is also the location of the Olympic The town was also known as Kecharis or Kecharuk, TSAGHKADZOR Darachicak, elev. 1837, pop. 1645) is Sports Center, one of the most popular training after the 10th-13th cc Kecharis Monastery, in the surrounded by forests on the eastern slope of Mt. sites in the former Soviet Union before falling on center of the town, founded by Grigor (Magistros) ̲ÔβÒàð Tsaghkuniats (2820.5 m). Located in one of the hard times in the post-Soviet world. The center is Pahlavuni with the construction of its first church, most beautiful areas of the country, the village in a constant state of renewal, now making its way S. Grigor Lusavorich in 1033, followed by S. exists as a resort, its once pristine hunting as both a training center with new facilities N’shan in 1051. The monastery, town and region By Rick Ney grounds for the rulers of Armenia now teeming (including a state-of-the-art Olympic pool) and a fell to the Seljuks a few years later, its fate tied to Maps by Rafael Torossian with modern tourists hot-dogging down its ski runs resort hotel. the ability of the Pahlavunis to placate their new Edited by Bella Karapetian or lounging in the cool summer breezes at any of a overlords.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency
    ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY – ARMENIA MUNICIPAL NETWORK FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACCOMPLISHMENTS prepared by A.Pasoyan Yerevan 2005 Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency Alliance To Save Energy - Armenia 31-77a Moskovian St, Yerevan 375002, Armenia. Tel/Fax: (37410) 533634, E-mail: [email protected]. Web: http://www.ase.org; http://www.munee.org Background USAID and the Alliance to Save Energy, in cooperation with their partners in the region, launched an initiative for developing a regional network for the promotion of energy efficiency at the municipal level. The goal of the Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency is to design and implement innovative energy efficiency policies and identify barriers to their successful adoption; and to strengthen the capacity of regional and municipal stakeholders to develop, and attract financing for, energy efficiency projects in the countries of Central and Southeastern Europe, the Balkans, the Central Asian Republics, Russia, and the former Soviet Union. The Network or MUNEE is functioning as an ongoing forum to share successful results of energy efficiency program development and implementation, and to address targeted policy areas critical to the success of energy efficiency investments in the region. Since the year 2000 the USAID Mission funded Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency (MUNEE) Program in Armenia, which has worked on different levels including promotion of national energy policy reform, municipal energy efficiency capacity building and residential energy and heat efficiency awareness programs. The activities implemented and some key accomplishments by the Alliance to Save Energy under the MUNEE program during 2002-2005 in Armenia are presented further in the present report covering: Policy Reform Condominium EE and Heating Education and Awareness Campaign Outreach to Cities/Strengthening the Municipal Energy Efficiency Network in Armenia For questions and comments contact: Alliance To Save Energy - Armenia 31-77a Moskovian St., Yerevan 375002 Tel/Fax.
    [Show full text]