DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction of Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes in Upper Hrazdan Pilot River Basin of Armenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTRODUCTION OF PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SCHEMES IN UPPER HRAZDAN PILOT RIVER BASIN OF ARMENIA Prepared by: "Geoinfo" LTD October, 2011 Yerevan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IN RUSSIAN........................................................................................... 5 1. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1. Documents Studied .............................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Definitions........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3. Categories of PES Services and Types of PES Schemes .................................................. 10 1.4. Valuation of Ecosystem Services........................................................................................ 11 1.5. Process in PES Establishment ........................................................................................... 12 1.6. Examples............................................................................................................................ 13 2. SELECTION OF PILOT RIVER BASIN .................................................................................... 16 2.1. Principles of selecting river basin........................................................................................ 16 3. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT .................................................................... 18 3.1. Geographic location............................................................................................................ 18 3.2. Topography ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3. Climate............................................................................................................................... 18 3.4. Landscapes........................................................................................................................ 19 3.5. Soils ................................................................................................................................... 20 3.6. Hydrology........................................................................................................................... 20 3.7. Natural Hazards.................................................................................................................. 24 3.8. Water Quality...................................................................................................................... 24 3.8.1. Hrazdan River Water Quality........................................................................................ 24 3.8.2. Marmarik River Water Quality ...................................................................................... 28 3.8.3. Tsaraghbyur River Water Quality ................................................................................. 31 3.9. Demography....................................................................................................................... 34 3.10. Economy .......................................................................................................................... 35 3.10.1. Industry...................................................................................................................... 35 3.10.2. Agriculture.................................................................................................................. 36 4. ANALYSIS OF NATURAL RESOURCES USE ........................................................................ 38 4.1. Landscapes........................................................................................................................ 38 2 4.2. Land Use............................................................................................................................ 38 4.3. Water Supply and Water Use ............................................................................................. 39 5. DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS......................................................................................................... 45 5.1. Water Quality...................................................................................................................... 45 5.2. Water Quantity ................................................................................................................... 47 5.3. Erosion Processes.............................................................................................................. 48 5.4. Deforestation...................................................................................................................... 48 5.5. Land Degradation............................................................................................................... 49 6. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION OF ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS....................... 50 6.1. Legislative Framework........................................................................................................ 50 6.2. Payments and Rates of Environmental Fees and Natural Resources Use Fees................. 52 7. PROPOSED PES SCHEME FOR THE PILOT RIVER BASIN.................................................. 55 7.1. Proposed Approach............................................................................................................ 55 7.2. The Extent of Application of PES and Proposed Rates....................................................... 57 7.3. Next Steps.......................................................................................................................... 58 3 List of Figures Figure 1: Major Issues in the Process of Establishing PES......................................................................13 Figure 2: Location of the Pilot River Basin in the Territory of Armenia......................................................17 Figure 3: Map of the Territory of the Pilot River Basin..............................................................................17 Figure 4: Landscapes of the Pilot River Basin .........................................................................................19 Figure 5: Hydrology of the Pilot River Basin ............................................................................................22 Figure 6: Average perennial discharges in Hrazdan-Hrazdan and Marmarik-Aghavnadzor hydrological observation posts .................................................................................................23 Figure 7: Aghbyurak Reservoir................................................................................................................24 Figure 8: Changes in the average annual concentrations of suspended solids in 1986-2010 ...................25 Figure 9: Changes in average annual concentrations of mineralization, hardness, hydrocarbonate, chloride, sulphate, magnesium, calcium, potassium and sodium ions in 1986-2010 ..................26 Figure 10: Changes in the average annual concentrations of BOD5, COD, ammonium, nitrite, nitrate and phosphate ions in 1986-2010..................................................................................27 Figure 11: Changes in the average annual concentrations of zinc, copper and iron in 1986-2010..............28 Figure 12: Changes in the average annual concentrations in nitrite ions in 1986-2010...............................29 Figure 13: Changes in the average annual concentrations of calcium in 1986-2010 ..................................30 Figure 14: Monthly dynamics of the suspended solids in 2008-2010..........................................................31 Figure 15: Monthly dynamics of the concentration of calcium and magnesium in 2008-2010 .....................32 Figure 16: Monthly dynamics of chloride and sulphate ions in 2008-2010..................................................32 Figure 17: The monthly dynamics of concentrations of nitrate nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen and phosphate in 2008-2010...........................................................................................................33 Figure 18: The dynamics of concentrations of the element copper in 2008-2010 .......................................34 Figure 19: Water loss From Degraded Pipelines .......................................................................................42 Figure 20: Water Use and Water Supply Service Areas.............................................................................44 List of Tables Table 1: Examples of local, national and international level public and private PES schemes .................13 Table 2: Forests in the pilot river basin...................................................................................................20 Table 3: Morphological characteristics of Hrazdan River and its upper sections......................................21 Table 4: Hydrological characteristics of Hrazdan basin according to hydrological observation posts .......22 Table 5: Characteristics of the reservoirs ...............................................................................................23 Table 6: The population number in upper Hrazdan River basin as of 2010 .............................................35 Table 7: Characteristics of the Industrial Enterprises in Pilot River Basin................................................36 Table 8: Livestock number in pilot river basin as of
Recommended publications
  • Tourism Development Trends in Armenia

    Tourism Development Trends in Armenia

    Tourism Education Studies and Practice, 2018, 5(1) Copyright © 2018 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. Published in the Slovak Republic Tourism Education Studies and Practice Has been issued since 2014. E-ISSN: 2409-2436 2018, 5(1): 20-25 DOI: 10.13187/tesp.2018.1.20 www.ejournal10.com Tourism Development Trends in Armenia Gayane Tovmasyan а , * Rubik Tovmasyan b a ''AMBERD'' Research Center of the Armenian State University of Economics, Armenia b Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia, Armenia Abstract In recent years tourism develops rapidly in Armenia. The main tourism statistics, tourism competitiveness index are presented and analyzed in the article. The article discusses the main types of tourism that may be developed in Armenia such as religious, historical-cultural, spa-resort, eco- and agri-, sport and adventure, gastronomic, urban, educational, scientific, medical tourism. Although the growth of tourism in recent years, there are still many problems that hinder the promotion of tourism. The tourism statistics, marketing policy, legislation must be improved. Besides, the educational system must meet the requirements of the labor market. Tourist specialists must have all the skills for tourism industry development. Thus, the main problems are revealed and the trends and ways of tourism development are analyzed in the article. Keywords: tourism, competitiveness, types of tourism, marketing, statistics, GDP, tourism development trends. 1. Introduction Tourism is one of the largest industries all over the world and develops very fast. Year by year more and more people travel to visit friends and relatives, to have leisure time, or with the purpose of business travel, education, health recovery, etc.
  • CBD Sixth National Report

    CBD Sixth National Report

    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
  • General Overview of the Local Self

    General Overview of the Local Self

    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN ARMENIA: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ARPINE VARDANYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA MAY 2014 SIGNATURE PAGE Faculty Advisor: Arthur Drampian Date Dean: Douglas Shumavon Date American University of Armenia May 2014 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM STATEMENT AND METHODOLOGY ............................................ 6 BACKGROUND AND OUTLINE OF THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 6 HYPOTHESES ........................................................................................................................... 9 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ... 19 3.1. ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL DIVISION AND GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY ........................................................................................ 19 3.2. CURRENT ISSUES IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ..................... 20 3.3. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS IN ARMENIA ...............................................................................................................................
  • Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives

    Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives

    WIND ENERGY IN ARMENIA: OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 MARCH 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by PA Government Services Inc. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 March 2010 © PA Consulting Group 2010 Prepared for: United States Agency for PA Government Services Inc. International Development 4601 N. Fairfax Drive Armenia Mission Suite 600 1 American Ave. Arlington, VA 22203 Yerevan 0082 Armenia Prepared by: PA Government Services Inc. Tel: +1 571 227 9000 Fax: +1 571 227 9001 www.paconsulting.com Version: 1.0 Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of potential and development perspectives. March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 1-1 2. Introduction 2-1 2.1 International Trends 2-1 2.2 State of the energy sector in Armenia 2-3 3. Wind Studies 3-1 4. Wind Measurements 4-1 5. Wind Energy Potential 5-1 6. Development perspectives 6-1 6.1 Technical limitations 6-1 6.2 Perspective Sites 6-3 6.3 Grid Interconnection 6-8 6.4 Economic Limitations 6-11 7.
  • Development of a River Basin Management Plan for Hrazdan River Basin

    Development of a River Basin Management Plan for Hrazdan River Basin

    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Results 2 & 3 DEVELOPMENT OF A RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HRAZDAN RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES Version 1, 28 September 2020 APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF THE HRAZDAN BASIN PUBLIC CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES EUWI+ PROJECT: "COMMUNICATION ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION PLAN FOR PARTICIPATIVE RBM PLANNING IN ARMENIA" Within the framework of the European Union Water Initiative Plus (EUWI+) programme, the process of developing Hrazdan and Sevan basin management plans started in 2018. The process of public discussion and consultation of the Hrazdan Basin Management Plan took place from 20 June to 20 August 2020. The Water Basin Management Plan is a guidance document developed as a result of collaboration between different stakeholders, offering common solutions to meet the needs of all water users, taking into account also the needs of the environment. Public participation plays a key role in the management plan development process. Questionnaires were used as a key tool in the public discussion and consulting process, through which expert opinions and information were collected to make additions to the water basin management plan. The questionnaires were disseminated through Gegharkunik Marzpetaran, the official website of the Ministry of Environment of the RA, the official website of EUWI+, the social networks of the CWP, as well as various CSO networks. The questionnaire was filled in by local self-government bodies (LSGB) representing 52 communities (57 questionnaires) and by non-governmental stakeholders in the basin – 134 questionnaires .A total of 191 questionnaires were completed.
  • Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment

    Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment

    Final Draft ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment By Arusyak Ghukasyan and Astghine Pasoyan Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF BOXES .......................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................6 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................8 2 EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF ARMENIA’S DISTRICT HEAT SUPPLY SECTOR.....................................................................................................................................................................8 3 HEAT SUPPLY POLICY REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS .............................11 3.1 ARMENIA’S URBAN HEATING STRATEGY ..............................................................................................11
  • 46941-014: Sevan-Hrazdan Cascade Hydropower System Rehabilitation

    46941-014: Sevan-Hrazdan Cascade Hydropower System Rehabilitation

    Extended Annual Review Report Project Number: 46941-014 Loan Number: 2996 November 2020 International Energy Corporation Sevan–Hrazdan Cascade Hydropower System Rehabilitation Project (Armenia) This is an abbreviated version of the document, which excludes information that is subject to exceptions to disclosure set forth in ADB’s Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency unit – dram (AMD) At Appraisal At Project Completion (3 April 2013) (5 March 2020) AMD1.00 – $0.00239 $0.00209 $1.00 – AMD418 AMD479 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CJSC – common joint stock company COVID-19 – coronavirus disease DEG – Deutsche Investitions- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH (German Investment and Development Corporation) DMF – design and monitoring framework EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EIA – environmental impact assessment ENA – Electric Networks of Armenia EROIC – economic return on invested capital ESIA – environmental and social impact assessment ESMS – environmental and social management system FMO – Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij voor Ontwikkelingslanden NV (Netherlands Development Finance Company) GRM – grievance redress mechanism GWh – gigawatt-hour IEC – International Energy Corporation kWh – kilowatt-hour MW – megawatt O&M – operation and maintenance PIP – project implementation plan PSRC – Public Services Regulatory Commission ROIC – return on invested capital SEP – stakeholder engagement plan WACC – weighted average cost of capital GLOSSARY GWh – gigawatt-hour = 1,000,000 kilowatt-hours MW – megawatt = 1,000,000 watts kWh – kilowatt-hour = 1,000 watt-hours NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the International Energy Corporation ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2019 ends on 31 December 2019. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars.
  • Quarterly Report April - June 2016

    Quarterly Report April - June 2016

    QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL - JUNE 2016 PREPARED BY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR TABLE OF CONTENT 1. COMMERCIAL DIRECTORATE .................. 4 2. OPERATIONAL DIRECTORATE ................. 8 3. WATER REMOVAL DIRECTORATE ........ 32 4. ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL DIRECTORATE ................................................ 38 5. INTERNAL CONTROL DIRECTORATE .... 43 6. HUMAN RESEOURCE DIRECTORATE .... 47 7. QUALITY, SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT ................................................. 50 8. PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT ....... 53 9. INVESTMENT PROGRAMS COORDINATION DIRECTORATE ................ 55 10. INDICATORS ............................................. 72 11. APPENDIX ................................................ 83 COMMERCIAL DIRECTORATE 1.1 Billing and revenue ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Customers service center .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Installation of new high quality water meters is over. About 40 000 water meters ( about 32 000 resi- dent-customers) were installed. Research proves that the program is justified and old water meters must be replaced with “C” class water meters. Below is the result of installed new water meters in Abovyan, Hrazdan and Ashtarak towns. Table 1 Number of Average consumption Average consumption customers with old water meters with new water meters Hrazdan 2 423 6.6
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia

    Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia

    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
  • Power Transmission Rehabilitation Project”, the Following Construction Activities Were Implemented During the Reporting Period (January-June, 2019)

    Power Transmission Rehabilitation Project”, the Following Construction Activities Were Implemented During the Reporting Period (January-June, 2019)

    Environmental Monitoring Report _________________________________________________________________________ 2019 1 st Semestral Report July 2019 ARM: Power Transmission and Rehabilitation Project Prepared by the Closed Joint Stock Company Electro Power Systems Operator (EPSO) for the Republic of Armenia and the Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2 This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. 2 SAEMR, January -June, 2019 _________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Preamble............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Headline Information ......................................................................................................... 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Description ...........................................................................................................
  • Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia

    Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia

    Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia DISCLAIMER This report has been developed within the framework of The European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) funded by the European Union, implemented by the OECD in partnership with UNECE. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. FOREWORD The project was implemented as part of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on water policy in Armenia conducted in co-operation with the European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia and facilitated by the OECD and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The OECD commissioned Trémolet Consulting Limited (UK) jointly with JINJ Ltd. (Armenia), which included Sophie Trémolet, Lilit Melikyan, Kevin Tayler, Eduard Mesropyan and Aida Iskoyan, for the analytical work and whom are also the authors of this report. Tatiana Efimova at the OECD provided essential oversight and inputs. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of participants of the EUWI National Policy Dialogue to the project and to this report, and would like to thank the State Committee of Water Systems of Armenia for a very productive co-operation. The authors thank Xavier Leflaive (OECD) for his valuable comments that helped improve both the content and structure of the report, and express their appreciation to Matthew Griffiths (OECD) for professional contributions to the project at its final stage. In addition, the authors thank Shukhrat Ziyaviddinov, Maria Dubois and Lupita Johanson (all OECD), for their valuable contribution to preparing publication of the report. The views presented in this report are those of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Government of Armenia, the European Union, or the OECD and its member countries.
  • Recent Problems of Developing a National Program on the Use Raw

    Recent Problems of Developing a National Program on the Use Raw

    Environment and Ecology Research 7(1): 7-11, 2019 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/eer.2019.070102 Recent Problems of Developing a National Program on the Use Raw Mineral Resources and Environmental Safety Protection in the Republic of Armenia (Lesser Caucasus Segment of Geo-ecologycal Systems of the Black Sea Region) Karapet Mouradian1,*, Aida Hayrapetyan1, Lusine Muradyan2 1Laboratory Ore Deposits, Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, Republic of Armenia 2National Institute of Health MH, Scientific- training Center, Republic of Armenia Copyright©2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The article considers recent problems of 1 . Introduction developing a national program on the use of raw mineral resources and environmental protection in the Republic of The purposeful use of non-renewable resources in the Armenia. These issues have many perspectives and are Republic of Armenia and ensuring of the protection and discussed in various aspects. The need for these studies is improvement of the environment - are the priority issues of obvious in connection with the restoration of promising strategic importance for public and state governance in branches of the mining industry in the RA and terms of the prospective development of new administrative-territorial economy in the 21st century[1-9]. development of the national and scientifically sound Armenian Highland and its northeastern part of the market programs for the Safety of Global environmental Republic of Armenia naturally occurring in the central part protection management.