An Economic Report to the Governor of the State of Tennessee: 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Economic Report to the Governor of the State of Tennessee: 2010 AN ECONOMIC REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE The State’s Economic Outlook January 2010 AN ECONOMIC REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE Matthew N. Murray, Associate Director and Project Director Center for Business and Economic Research Prepared by the Center for Business and Economic Research College of Business Administration The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee In cooperation with the Appalachian Regional Commission Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development Tennessee Department of Revenue and Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development Nashville, Tennessee The State’s Economic Outlook January 2010 Acknowledgements Contributors to this Report An Economic Report to the Governor of the State of Tennessee Authors Center for Business and Economic Research Matthew N. Murray, Associate Director and Project Director William F. Fox, Director Vickie C. Cunningham, Research Associate Ann Boyd Davis, Graduate Research Assistant Rebekah D. McCarty, Graduate Research Assistant Todd R. Yarbrough, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Agricultural Economics Harwood D. Schaffer, Research Associate, Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Kelly J. Tiller, Assistant Professor and Director of the Offi ce of Bioenergy Programs Daryll E. Ray, Blasingame Chair of Excellence Professor, Professor and Director of the Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Jane H. Starnes, Director of the Center for Tobacco Grower Research Project Support Staff Betty A. Drinnen, Program Resource Specialist Carrie B. McCamey, Communications Coordinator Laura Ogle-Graham, Business Manager Melissa O. Reynolds, Research Associate The preparation of this report was fi nanced in part by the following agencies: the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration, the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development, the Tennessee Department of Revenue, the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and the Appalachian Regional Commission. This material is the result of tax-supported research and as such is not copyrightable. It may be freely reprinted with the customary crediting of the source. UT Publication Authorization Number R01-1493-202-012-10. ii 2010 Tennessee Economic Report Preface Preface This 2010 volume of An Economic Report to the Governor of the State of Tennessee is the 34th in a series of annual reports compiled in response to requests by state government offi cials for assistance in achieving greater interdepartmental consistency in planning and budgeting efforts sensitive to the overall economic environment. Both short-term, or business cycle-sensitive forecasts, and longer-term, or trend forecasts, are provided in this report. The quarterly state forecast through the fi rst quarter of 2012 and annual forecast through 2019 represent the collective judgment of the staff of the University of Tennessee’s Center for Business and Economic Research in conjunction with the Quarterly and Annual Tennessee Econometric Models. The national forecasts were prepared by IHS Global Insight, Inc. Tennessee forecasts, current as of January 2010, are based on an array of assumptions, particularly at the national level, which are described in Chapter One. Chapter Two details evaluations for major sectors of the Tennessee economy, with an agriculture section provided by the University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center. Chapter Three presents the long-run outlook and forecast for the state. Chapter Four discusses the future of Tennessee’s transportation equipment sector. The primary purpose of this annual volume—published, distributed, and fi nanced through the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration, Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development, the Tennessee Department of Revenue, the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and the Appalachian Regional Commission—is to provide wide public dissemination of the most-current possible economic analysis to planners and decision-makers in the public and private sectors. Matthew N. Murray Associate Director and Project Director Center for Business and Economic Research 2010 Tennessee Economic Report iii Contents Contents The U.S. Economy ........................................................................1 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................1 1.2. The U.S. Economy: Year in Review ............................................................2 Components of GDP ............................................................................................2 Infl ation and Prices ..............................................................................................7 The Labor Market .................................................................................................9 1.3. The U.S. Forecast ......................................................................................13 Consumption and the Labor Market.................................................................13 Investment and Interest Rates ..........................................................................15 Government Spending ......................................................................................16 International Trade .............................................................................................16 Prices and Infl ation ............................................................................................16 1.4. Alternative Scenarios ................................................................................17 1.5. Forecast Summary and Conclusions ......................................................17 The Tennessee Economy: Short-Term Outlook ......................19 2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................19 2.2. The Current Economic Environment .......................................................20 2.3. State Tax Revenues ...................................................................................25 2.4. Short-Term Outlook ...................................................................................31 2.5. Situation and Outlook for Tennessee Agriculture ..................................34 Overview of Agriculture in Tennessee .............................................................34 Tennessee Agricultural Sector Outlook ...........................................................36 Ag Sector Issues and Opportunities ................................................................39 The Tennessee Economy: Long-Term Outlook ......................45 3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................45 3.2. A Retrospective and Prospective Look at State Government Revenue ......................................................................................................46 Historical Growth in Tax Collections ...............................................................46 The Outlook for State Tax Collections .............................................................48 3.3. Employment Outlook ................................................................................51 3.4. Unemployment and Population ................................................................55 3.5. Personal Income and Taxable Sales ........................................................57 3.4. State Gross Domestic Product .................................................................57 iv 2010 Tennessee Economic Report Contents Contents, continued The Future of the U.S. Automobile Industry ............................61 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................61 4.2. Same as it Ever Was ..................................................................................62 4.3. The Rise and Fall of the U.S. Automobile Industry ................................65 4.4. The Future of the U.S. Automobile Industry ...........................................66 Increasing Flexibility: Situational Awareness and Increasing Automation .........................................................................................................67 The Changing Face of Cost Structures............................................................68 4.5. Future Technologies..................................................................................70 Composite Materials for Automobile Bodies ..................................................70 Nanotechnology and Automobiles ...................................................................71 Artifi cial Intelligence Making Automobiles Smarter .......................................72 The Electric Automobile ...................................................................................74 The Outlook ........................................................................................................75 4.6. Future Trends and Product Demand .......................................................77 Demographic Shifts and the Impact on Demand ............................................77 4.7. Labor and Workers ....................................................................................78 More Automobiles-Fewer Jobs? .......................................................................78 We’re Not in Detroit Anymore ...........................................................................79
Recommended publications
  • Octubre De 2008
    Octubre de 2008 1 Cómo volver mercancía hasta la última brizna de hierba Ingeniería genética extrema y la economía post-petrolera del azúcar Octubre de 2008 Debido a la crisis del petróleo, a la escalada en los precios de los combustibles y a la crisis del clima, las corporaciones redirigen su entusiasmo hacia una “revolución de la ingeniería biológica” que algunos auguran transformará dramáticamente la producción industrial de alimentos, energía, materias primas, medicina y la naturaleza entera. Los entusiastas de las tecnologías convergentes prometen una era post-petróleo más verde y limpia, donde la producción de compuestos importantes para la economía no dependerá de los combustibles fósiles, sino de la manufactura de plataformas biológicas alimentadas por azúcares vegetales. Tal vez suene dulce y limpio, pero la llamada “economía del azúcar” también catalizará la voracidad de las corporaciones por toda la materia vegetal — y con ello, la destrucción de la biodiversidad a una escala masiva. La bioeconomía del futuro dependerá de la “ingeniería genética extrema”, un conjunto de tecnologías que aún se encuentran en sus etapas iniciales de desarrollo: secuenciamiento genético barato y rápido; partes biológicas hechas a la orden, ingeniería y diseño de genomas; fabricación de materiales y sistemas operativos en la nanoescala. El denominador común es que todas estas tecnologías —biotecnología, nanotecnología, biología sintética— involucran el diseño de organismos en la nanoescala. Esta convergencia tecnológica promueve la convergencia del poder corporativo. Las nuevas tecnologías de bioingeniería atraen miles de millones de dólares de financiamiento de los gigantes de los químicos y los agronegocios, entre los que se incluyen DuPont, BP, Shell, Chevron, Cargill, entre otros.
    [Show full text]
  • Offer Document
    OFFER DOCUMENT VOLUNTARY RECOMMENDED PUBLIC OFFER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF Danisco A/S (Companies registration no. (CVR) 11 35 03 56) submitted by DuPont Denmark Holding ApS (Companies registration no. (CVR) 33 38 21 54) a wholly owned and fully controlled subsidiary of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company a Delaware corporation, USA 21 January 2011 Danish Financial Advisor CONTENTS SUMMARY OF THE OFFER ............................................................................................... 6 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 10 1.1 THE OFFER ................................................................................. 10 1.2 IMPORTANT DATES RELATING TO THE OFFER .................................... 11 1.3 THE OFFER PRICE ........................................................................ 12 1.4 THE OFFER PERIOD ...................................................................... 13 2 BACKGROUND FOR THE OFFER AND PLANS FOR DANISCO .................................. 14 2.1 PROCESS LEADING TO THE SUBMISSION OF THE OFFER ..................... 14 2.2 BACKGROUND FOR THE OFFER; STRATEGIC RATIONALE...................... 14 2.3 PLANS FOR DANISCO; INTEGRATION............................................... 15 3 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER ......................................................... 17 3.1 OFFEROR.................................................................................... 17 3.2 OFFER PRICE .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 10–15–09 Vol. 74 No. 198 Thursday Oct. 15, 2009 Pages 52863–53144
    10–15–09 Thursday Vol. 74 No. 198 Oct. 15, 2009 Pages 52863–53144 VerDate Nov 24 2008 21:40 Oct 14, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\15OCWS.LOC 15OCWS hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS6 II Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovating Through Alliance: a Case Study of the Dupont–BP Partnership on Biofuels
    White Paper Innovating through Alliance: A Case Study of the DuPont–BP Partnership on Biofuels By Truman Semans and Andre de Fontaine September 2009 Truman Semans is a Principal of GreenOrder, a business strategy consulting firm focused on environmental sustainability whose clients have included GE, major utilities, BP, DuPont, HP, and GM. He has advised dozens of Fortune 500 corporations on energy, climate, technology, and policy. He has served on the Executive Committee of US Climate Action Partnership and, while at the U.S. Treasury, as a member of the U.S. Climate Change Negotiating Team. Truman consulted with McKinsey & Co., and he serves on the Board of Directors of the National Climate Trust, the Board of Visitors of the Nicholas School of the Environment, and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation President's Advisory Committee. Andre de Fontaine is a Markets and Business Strategy Fellow at the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. 1 White Paper – Pew Center on Global Climate Change Preface—An Update Provided by DuPont and BP on their Advanced Biofuels Partnership This paper aims to provide insights into how industry alliances can deliver innovation and new technologies in an accelerated fashion. Since work began on this paper, the relationship between DuPont and BP has evolved significantly. This preface to the case study, written by representatives from DuPont and BP, provides an update on the companies’ work together. In June 2009, the partners formalized their relationship and created Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC, a joint venture tasked with completing the technology development and commercialization of biobutanol – the advanced, premium biofuel molecule that had catalyzed the companies’ initial partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Dupont's Journey to Build a Global Cellulosic Biofuel Business
    DuPont’s Journey to Build a Global Cellulosic BioFuel Business Enterprise William D. Provine, Director – Science & Technology Biomass 2014 – Washington, DC | July 29th, 2014 Copyright © 2014 DuPont. All rights reserved 1 Regulation G The attached charts include company information that does not conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Management believes that an analysis of this data is meaningful to investors because it provides insight with respect to ongoing operating results of the company and allows investors to better evaluate the financial results of the company. These measures should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. Furthermore, these measures may not be consistent with similar measures provided by other companies. This data should be read in conjunction with previously published company reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K. These reports, along with reconciliations on non-GAAP measures to GAAP are available on the Investor Center of www.dupont.com under Key Financials & Filings. Forward Looking Statements During the course of this presentation we may make forward-looking statements or provide forward-looking information. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future are forward-looking statements. Some of these statements include words such as “plans,” “expects,” “will,” “anticipates,” "believes," “intends,” and “estimates.” Although they reflect our current expectations, these statements are not guarantees of future performance, but involve a number
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Dupont Annual Review • Zero-Base All Capital Expenditures
    Market-Driven Science Our Mission: Sustainable Growth—The creation of shareholder and societal value while we reduce To DuPont Shareholders our environmental footprint along the value chains in which we operate. 2008 DuPont Annual Review • Zero-Base All Capital Expenditures. Capital spending will require innovation in a host of technologies across many Despite the economic turmoil, our accomplishments were DuPont Agriculture DuPont Coatings DuPont Electronic DuPont Performance DuPont Safety in 2009 will be reduced by about 20 percent versus 2008. industries. As a market-driven science company, we have many in 2008: & Nutrition & Color Technologies & Communication Materials & Protection We continue to assess each project to determine whether factored these trends into the market-back approach we Technologies • Our Agriculture & Nutrition segment sales grew 16 percent further cuts are warranted, using a “zero-based” approach take in our research and Strategies: Strategies: Strategies: Strategies: Strategies: and underlying pretax operating income grew 24 percent. and raising the bar on project justifi cation. innovation. The current DUPONT CORE VALUES Accelerating growth Further globalize Grow base businesses | Deliver innovative products Leverage market-driven We laid the groundwork for our Y Series soybeans, which global crisis is reshaping • Aggressively Reduce Working Capital. More than 200 • Safety & Health in a strong Ag market operations and accelerate Expand share in Asia | and market-focused science to develop and will be the largest product launch in Pioneer history. many opportunities, environment | Advancing growth in emerging Increase revenue from solutions | Leverage global commercialize new new projects aimed at reducing working capital were • Environmental Stewardship but we expect these and commercializing markets | Deliver new products | Grow capabilities and value products | Differentiate • For the full year, 64 percent of total sales were generated staffed and launched early in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Bioenergy and Economic Aspects
    Sustainable Bioenergy and Economic Aspects Dr. John P. Ranieri Vice President, Industrial Biosciences GBEP Executive Capacity Development Seminar Rome, Italy November 11, 2011 Smart, Sustainable Growth DuPont’s commitment: Creating shareholder and societal value while decreasing the environmental footprint along our value chains “Environmental footprint” = injuries, illnesses, incidents, waste and emissions, and depletable forms of raw materials and energy 11/11/2011 2 DuPont Pro Forma Sales – 2010* $3.0 B $7.8 B Nutrition & Health $3.8 B Agriculture Performance Coatings $2.8 B $6.3 B Total Electronics & Performance Communications Company$34.2B * Materials $34.1B $6.3 B $3.4 B Performance Safety & Chemicals Protection $0.9 B Industrial * Includes $0.2B in ‘other’ sales. Total company sales exclude transfers. Biosciences 11/11/2011 3 Megatrends Opportunities Megatrend DuPont Solutions Goals Increasing Food Production • Seeds, crop protection, food & nutrition products, and food packaging materials Goals Decreasing Dependence • PV, fuel cell components, energy efficient Tyvek® materials, lightweight composites for transportation, on Fossil Fuels biofuels, biomaterials • Kevlar®, Nomex® and Tyvek® for worker protection, Goals Protecting People & the SentryGlas®, safety services, environmental protection Environment material solutions Goals Growing in Developing • Agricultural products, food packaging, materials for Markets construction & infrastructure projects, PV… Strong Renewable Products Portfolio Megatrends Drive Opportunities for Tailored,
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns Nature? Corporate Power and the Final Frontier in the Commodi!Cation of Life
    112008 Who Owns Nature? Corporate Power and the Final Frontier in the Commodi!cation of Life November 2008 Communiqué November 2008 Issue #100 Who Owns Nature? Corporate Power and the Final Frontier in the Commodi!cation of Life ETC Group www.etcgroup.org November 2008 Publication Design by Wordsmith Services and yellowDog : creative Original Artwork by Stig Table of Contents Problems, Fascinations and Opportunities: A Preface 3 Who Owns Nature? 4 Graphic: Top 10 Corporations: Global Market Share by Sector 4 The Context 5 Chart: Value of Global Mergers & Acquisitions 7 Section 1: Corporate Farm Inputs: Seeds, Agrochemicals, Fertilizers 11 Seed Industry 11 World’s Top 10 Seed Companies 11 Chart: Global Commercial Seed Market 11 Chart: Top 10 Share of Global Proprietary Seed Market 12 Chart: Global Proprietary Seed Market, 2007 12 Agrochemical Industry 15 World’s Top 10 Pesticide Firms 15 Chart: Global Agrochemical Market, 2007 sales 15 Fertilizer Industry 17 World’s Biggest Fertilizer Companies 17 Chart: Corporate Food Chain At-a-Glance 18 Section 2: Corporate Food Outputs: Food & Beverage Manufacturing, Global Grocery Retailers 21 Food & Beverage Manufacturing Industry 21 World’s Top 10 Food & Beverage Corporations 21 Grocery Retailing Industry 22 World’s Top 10 Global Food Retailers 22 Chart: Global Food Retailers: Top 10 Account for 40% of Groceries Sold by Top 100 22 Chart: Global Food & Beverage Companies: Top 10 Account for 35% of Packaged Food Sold by Top 100 23 Cartoon by Tom Toles 23 Section 3: Corporate Medicine & Health: Big
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Dupont Data Book
    2010 DUPONT DATA BOOK Delivering solutions, delivering growth through inclusive innovation. Contents DuPont Investor Relations 1 2010 Summary 2 2010 At a Glance 4 Corporate Financial Data Corporate Highlights Segment Information Karen Fletcher Laurie Conslato Jeanmarie Desmond Vice President Director, Agriculture Director Consolidated Income Statements (302) 774-0001 & Nutrition (302) 774-2229 Consolidated Balance Sheets (515) 535-6643 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Selected Additional Data 13 Industries, Regions and Ingredients 14 DuPont Core Values, Sustainability and Productivity Tucker Norton Patricia Esham 15 DuPont Science & Technology Manager Specialist (302) 774-9810 (302) 774-9870 16 DuPont Applied BioSciences 17 Business Segments Agriculture & Nutrition The DuPont DATA BOOK has been prepared to assist financial analysts, portfolio Electronics & Communications managers and others in understanding and evaluating the company. This book presents graphics, tabular and other statistical data about the consolidated company and its Performance Chemicals business segments. The information presented in this book is generally included in— Performance Coatings or can be calculated from—previously issued press releases and published company reports on Forms 10K, 10Q and 8K. Dollars are in millions except per share or where Performance Materials otherwise indicated. Most notes to financial statements are not included. This information Safety & Protection is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the company’s audited consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis,” which Pharmaceuticals is located in the 2010 Form 10K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 35 Major Global Sites and Principal Products Use of Non-GAAP Measures As a supplement to DuPont’s financial results prepared in accordance with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • By ETC Group. October 2011. Synthetic Biology
    Extract from Forthcoming Report “Who Will Control the Green Economy” by ETC Group. October 2011. Synthetic Biology The term biomass narrowly refers to the weight of living matter (plants, animals, bacteria, fungi, etc.) found in a specified area, but is more often used to mean non-fossilized biological material that can serve as a feedstock for the manufacture of bio-based products. The term implies a particular way of thinking about nature: as a commodity even before it enters the commercial market. In other words, everything living is a potential article of commerce. Around the world, industry and governments are turning to biomass – touting it as a solution to climate change as well as a means to increase production, especially energy production. Meanwhile, the field of synthetic biology has rapidly overshadowed transgenics – where single genes are transferred from one organism to another (as in genetically-modified crops, for example). Synthetic biology companies are engineering synthetic DNA to custom- build algae and microbes that behave as tiny “biological factories.” The aim is to convert almost any biomass into almost any product. With billions of dollars of public and private investment over the past few years (including the world’s largest energy and chemical companies), synthetic biology sees nature’s biodiversity as a feedstock for its proprietary bugs – designer organisms that will be used to transform plant cellulose into fuels, chemicals, plastics, fibres, pharmaceuticals or even food – depending on market demand at harvest time. The new “BioMassters” see synthetic biology as the route to an additional revenue stream – a “green” complement to petroleum-based production – or possibly its replacement in the distant future.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 DUPONT ANNUAL REVIEW Declines Hit Us Very Our Core Values Which Are the Absolute Bedrock of Dupont
    OUR MISSION: SUSTAINABLE GROWTH To DuPont Shareholders The creation of shareholder and societal value while we reduce our environmental footprint The Needs of the World Drive Our Science and Marketing Tyvek ® protective apparel is used by workers in a wide As we entered 2009, the world’s economies remained in the • Our engine of innovation never slowed down. We along the value chains in which we operate. Global population growth and associated growth in range of environments. Our Building Innovations materials grip of the global recession and worldwide fi nancial crisis. continued research and development investment incorporate protection into new and existing structures. during the recession at the same level as pre-recession. the middle class are creating distinct needs throughout At DuPont, we responded by focusing on what we could the world. These needs, which we call megatrends, are Our Sustainable Solutions business offers consulting DuPont Agriculture Mission: cost and working capital We introduced more than 1,400 new products in 2009— Accelerate earnings and productivity while control. We put in place directives aimed at maximizing providing DuPont the opportunity to bring our unmatched and training that help our clients improve the safety and & Nutrition or about 60 percent more than in 2008—and fi led 2,086 cash growth through making selective growth margin, dramatically reducing spending, zero-basing science to the marketplace to create game-changing effectiveness of their organizations and operations. We Businesses: U.S. patent applications, the most ever in a single year Pioneer Hi-Bred | cost and working capital investments, providing capital expenditures and solutions in constant collaboration with our customers also provide unique technology that supplies clean air, for our company.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0134.182 A1 Shimizu Et Al
    US 200701341 82A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0134.182 A1 Shimizu et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 14, 2007 (54) COSMETC COMPOSITION COMPRISING (30) Foreign Application Priority Data AN ESTER OF DIMERDLINOLEC ACID AND OF POLYOLCS) AND A SILICONE Dec. 8, 2005 (FR)............................................ O5 53,797 SURFACTANT (75) Inventors: Momoko Shimizu, Tokyo (JP); Emiko Publication Classification Tokunaga, Kanagawa (JP) (51) Int. Cl. Correspondence Address: A6IR 8/37 (2006.01) OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC P.O. BOX 19928 (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................... 424/64; 424/70.31 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320 (US) (73) Assignee: L'OREAL PARIS (FR) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 11/635,006 The present invention relates to an anhydrous cosmetic (22) Filed: Dec. 7, 2006 composition for caring for and/or making up the skin and/or the lips, comprising at least one ester of dimerdilinoleic acid Related U.S. Application Data and of polyol(s) or an ester thereof, the viscosity of which, (60) Provisional application No. 60/754,189, filed on Dec. measured at about 25°C., is greater than or equal to about 28, 2005. 20 000 mPa.s, and at least one silicone surfactant. US 2007/01341.82 A1 Jun. 14, 2007 COSMETC COMPOSITION COMPRISING AN 0012 For example, the cosmetic composition according ESTER OF DIMERDLINOLEIC ACID AND OF to the invention has a gloss and/or a gloss staying power that POLYOLCS) AND A SILICONE SURFACTANT is/are not affected, or that is/are even improved. 0001. This non provisional application claims the benefit 0013 Thus, according to one of these aspects, one subject of French Application No.
    [Show full text]