Thermometer - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In-Cloud Icing and Supercooled Cloud Microphysics: from Reanalysis to Mesoscale Modeling
UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT CHICOUTIMI MANUSCRIPT-BASED THESIS PRESENTED TO UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT CHICOUTIMI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR Ph.D. IN EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES OFFERED AT UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT MONTREAL UNDER A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT CHICOUTIMI BY FAYÇAL LAMRAOUI IN-CLOUD ICING AND SUPERCOOLED CLOUD MICROPHYSICS: FROM REANALYSIS TO MESOSCALE MODELING NOVEMBER 2014 © Fayçal Lamraoui, 2014 The ice storm - January 1998 Oil on canvas painting – Artist: A. Poirier In the distance, the Montérégie, viewed from Mont-Royal (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (Courtesy of the community Ste-Croix, Saint-Laurent) iii ABSTRACT In-cloud icing is continually associated with potential hazardous meteorological conditions at higher altitudes in the troposphere across the world and near surface over mountainous and cold climate regions. This PhD thesis aims to scrutinize the horizontal and vertical characteristics of near-surface in-cloud icing events, the associated cloud microphysics, develop and demonstrate an innovative method to determine the climatology of icing events at high resolution. In reference to ice accretion, the quantification of icing events is based on the cylinder model. With the use of North American Regional Reanalysis, a preliminary mapping of the icing severity index spanning a 32-year time period is introduced and in that way the freezing precipitation during the ice storm of January 1998 is quantified and compared to observations. Also, case studies over Mount- Bélair and Bagotville are investigated. The assessment of icing events obtained from NARR demonstrates agreements with observation over simple terrains and disparities over complex terrains, due to the coarse resolution of the reanalysis. -
FAA Advisory Circular AC 91-74B
U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Circular Subject: Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions Date:10/8/15 AC No: 91-74B Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: This advisory circular (AC) contains updated and additional information for the pilots of airplanes under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 91, 121, 125, and 135. The purpose of this AC is to provide pilots with a convenient reference guide on the principal factors related to flight in icing conditions and the location of additional information in related publications. As a result of these updates and consolidating of information, AC 91-74A, Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions, dated December 31, 2007, and AC 91-51A, Effect of Icing on Aircraft Control and Airplane Deice and Anti-Ice Systems, dated July 19, 1996, are cancelled. This AC does not authorize deviations from established company procedures or regulatory requirements. John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 10/8/15 AC 91-74B CONTENTS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1. Purpose ..............................................................................................................................1 1-2. Cancellation ......................................................................................................................1 1-3. Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1-4. Discussion .........................................................................................................................6 -
Thermometer 1 Thermometer
Thermometer 1 Thermometer Developed during the 16th and 17th centuries, a thermometer (from the Greek θερμός (thermo) meaning "warm" and meter, "to measure") is a device that measures temperature or temperature gradient using a variety of different principles.[1] A thermometer has two important elements: the temperature sensor (e.g. the bulb on a mercury thermometer) in which some physical change occurs with temperature, plus some means of converting this physical change into a numerical value (e.g. the scale on a mercury thermometer). A clinical mercury-in-glass thermometer There are many types of thermometer and many uses for thermometers, as detailed below in sections of this article. Temperature While an individual thermometer is able to measure degrees of hotness, the readings on two thermometers cannot be compared unless they conform to an agreed scale. There is today an absolute thermodynamic temperature scale. Internationally agreed temperature scales are designed to approximate this closely, based on fixed points and interpolating thermometers. The most recent official temperature scale is the International Temperature Scale of 1990. It extends from 0.65 K (−272.5 °C; −458.5 °F) to approximately 1358 K (1085 °C; 1985 °F). Thermometer Thermometer 2 Development Various authors have credited the invention of the thermometer to Cornelius Drebbel, Robert Fludd, Galileo Galilei or Santorio Santorio. The thermometer was not a single invention, however, but a development. Philo of Byzantium and Hero of Alexandria knew of the principle that certain substances, notably air, expand and contract and described a demonstration in which a closed tube partially filled with air had its end in a container of water.[2] The expansion and contraction of the air caused the position of the water/air interface to move along the tube. -
Chapter1.Pdf
Chapter 1 -- Taking the Temperature of the Planet Peter deMenocal “The heat is on” - Glenn Frey 31 December, 1768: “No one can recall such a mild Autumn: the ground is as green as in the Spring, and today I have picked sufficient young nettles, dandelions, and other herbs to cook green cabbage tomorrow, which is New Year’s day.” Colorful mixes of meteorology and domestic concerns are typical of weather diaries kept by diligent observers for centuries. This example, from the Stockholm Observatory in Sweden, is not unusual, but it does pose prob- lems for those interested in climate change. For instance, exactly how mild was that autumn and how might it compare to autumn in 2007? To answer those questions and others like them, these qualitative descriptions are not sufficient—quantitative measures are required. Galileo Galilei developed the first thermomete in the late 1500s. The “thermoscope”, as beautiful as it was imprecise, was an elegant liquid-filled glass cylinder hosting several colorful, sealed glass bulbs that rose and sank with changes in temperature as their density relative to the liquid changed. More accurate measurements became available two centuries later, when German physicist Daniel Fahrenheit developed the sealed mercury thermometer in 1714 and the temperature scale that bears his name. As with many scientific advances, this new way of reducing nature to numbers lead to a new way of viewing the climate. No longer was the difference between one year and another simply a qualitative change – warmer, cooler, wetter – but a difference that could be reliably quantified. These records gave rise to the statistics of weather and eventually to the possibility of detecting subtle changes in climate. -
Chemmatters December 2006 Reading Strategies
December 2006 Teacher's Guide About the Guide...............................................................................................................................3 Student Questions .........................................................................................................................4 Answers to Student Questions.............................................................................................5 Puzzle: Chemistry Drop-outs .................................................................................................7 Answers to Puzzle: Chemistry Drop-outs ....................................................................8 Content Reading Guide ......................................................................................................................9 National Science Education Content Standard Addressed.......................................................................9 Anticipation Guides ...........................................................................................................................10 Corn-the A’maiz’ing Grain .......................................................................................................................10 Sticky Situations: the Wonders of Glue...................................................................................................11 Unusual Sunken Treasure.......................................................................................................................12 Thermometers .........................................................................................................................................13 -
Fall 2015 Vol 17 No 3 Mea-Mft.Org MEA-MFT a Publication for Members of MEA-MFT
Trouble in Dawson 4 State employees Apply now for Amazing Member pay it forward 5 Karen Cox Grants 7 Josh Racki 12 Fall 2015 Vol 17 No 3 mea-mft.org MEA-MFT A publication for members of MEA-MFT Pushing back the classroom walls 2016 Montana Teacher of the Year Jessica Anderson Great teaching has a domino ef- fect. So it’s appropriate that Jessica Anderson showed up for school the day before Halloween dressed as a domino. Anderson has no objection to fun and games in the classroom. In fact, she uses games extensively to teach science concepts. “Our entire classroom is a game,” she said. Her students love it — to the point of not wanting to leave sometimes when class is over. “Students who typically struggle in school frequently excel under Jessica’s leadership,” says her school principal, Kerry Glisson. Anderson’s innovation and non- stop energy recently earned her the Finalist Derek Strahn, Teacher of the Year Jessica Anderson, and inalist Shelly title of 2016 Montana Teacher of Stanton at the Teacher of the Year Celebration Oct. 15. All are MEA-MFT members. the Year. She teaches earth science, chemistry, and physics at Powell MEA-MFT scores inal victory County High School in Deer Lodge and oceanography through the in saving our retirement beneits Montana Digital Academy. GABA preserved for employees still working and those who are She says her inspiration to teach & retirees in TRS & PERS retired. It means the yearly cost-of- came from her grandmother, who This August, MEA-MFT won the living increase they were guaranteed taught in a one-room school on last round in its two-year legal battle when they were hired — called “guar- the North Dakota plains where she to save public employees’ and anteed annual beneit adjustment” cleaned the school, tended to the teachers’ retirement beneits. -
Guidelines for Meteorological Icing Models, Statistical Methods and Topographical Effects
291 GUIDELINES FOR METEOROLOGICAL ICING MODELS, STATISTICAL METHODS AND TOPOGRAPHICAL EFFECTS Working Group B2.16 Task Force 03 April 2006 GUIDELINES FOR METEOROLOGICAL ICING MODELS, STATISTICAL METHODS AND TOPOGRAPHICAL EFFECTS Task Force B2.16.03 Task Force Members: André Leblond – Canada (TF Leader) Svein M. Fikke – Norway (WG Convenor) Brian Wareing – United Kingdom (WG Secretary) Sergey Chereshnyuk – Russia Árni Jón Elíasson – Iceland Masoud Farzaneh – Canada Angel Gallego – Spain Asim Haldar – Canada Claude Hardy – Canada Henry Hawes – Australia Magdi Ishac – Canada Samy Krishnasamy – Canada Marc Le-Du – France Yukichi Sakamoto – Japan Konstantin Savadjiev – Canada Vladimir Shkaptsov – Russia Naohiko Sudo – Japan Sergey Turbin – Ukraine Other Working Group Members: Anand P. Goel – Canada Franc Jakl – Slovenia Leon Kempner – Canada Ruy Carlos Ramos de Menezes – Brasil Tihomir Popovic – Serbia Jan Rogier – Belgium Dario Ronzio – Italy Tapani Seppa – USA Noriyoshi Sugawara – Japan Copyright © 2006 “Ownership of a CIGRE publication, whether in paper form or on electronic support only infers right of use for personal purposes. Are prohibited, except if explicitly agreed by CIGRE, total or partial reproduction of the publication for use other than personal and transfer to a third party; hence circulation on any intranet or other company network is forbidden”. Disclaimer notice “CIGRE gives no warranty or assurance about the contents of this publication, nor does it accept any responsibility, as to the accuracy or exhaustiveness of the -
Oil in Galileo Thermometer
Page 1/11 Safety Data Sheet according to 1907/2006/EC (REACH), 1272/2008/EC (CLP), and GHS Printing date 26.06.2014 Revision: 26.06.2014 1 Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking · 1.1 Product identifier · Trade name: Oil of Galileo Thermometer · CAS Number: 8008-20-6 · EC number: 232-366-4 · Index number: 649-404-00-4 · 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against No further relevant information available. · Application of the substance / the mixture Product Component · 1.3 Details of the supplier of the Safety Data Sheet · Manufacturer/Supplier: H-B Instrument – A Division of Bel-Art Products 102 West Seventh Avenue Trappe, PA 19426 USA Phone: (610) 489-5500 · 1.4 Emergency telephone number: ChemTel Inc. (800)255-3924, +1 (813)248-0585 2 Hazards identification · 2.1 Classification of the substance or mixture · Classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 The following classifications are applicable only to the general GHS regulations and not the specific CLP regulation: H227 - Combustible liquid. H227: Combustible Liquid. (General GHS and USA only) health hazard Carc. 2 H351 Suspected of causing cancer. Asp. Tox. 1 H304 May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. · Classification according to Directive 67/548/EEC or Directive 1999/45/EC Xn; Harmful R65: Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed. · Information concerning particular hazards for human and environment: Not applicable. · 2.2 Label elements · Labelling according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 The following classifications are applicable only to the general GHS regulations and not the specific CLP regulation: combustible liquid. -
Weld County School District RE-1 Disbursement Detail Listing
Weld County School District RE-1 Disbursement Detail Listing Bank Name: General Fund Operating Date Range: 05/01/2015 - 05/30/2015 Sort By: Check Bank Account: 4420500259 Voucher Range: - Dollar Limit: $0.00 Fiscal Year: 2014-2015 Print Employee Vendor Names Exclude Voided Checks Exclude Manual Checks Include Non Check Batches Check Number Date Voucher Payee Invoice Account Description Amount Bank Name: General Fund Operating Bank Account: 4420500259 83623 05/05/2015 1147 Mama Ruth's Pizza Shop Assist Supt Committe 10.654.00.2832.0580.000.0000 Assistant Supt. Committee $42.75 Check Total: $42.75 83624 05/12/2015 1148 4 Rivers Equipment 33 3303193 10.760.00.2630.0430.000.0000 Grounds Maint & Repairs $1,059.23 83624 05/12/2015 1148 4 Rivers Equipment 33 3303263 10.760.00.2630.0430.000.0000 Grounds Maint & Repairs ($94.47) Check Total: $964.76 83625 05/12/2015 1148 A&E Tire Inc. 127183-00 10.770.00.2742.0610.000.0000 Pool Vehicle Supplies $543.24 Check Total: $543.24 83626 05/12/2015 1148 AbleNet, Inc. CI1505020 10.331.00.1780.0610.000.3130 Battery device adapter AA $38.40 83626 05/12/2015 1148 AbleNet, Inc. CI1505020 10.331.00.1780.0610.000.3130 Pretty Poodle $49.00 83626 05/12/2015 1148 AbleNet, Inc. CI1505020 10.331.00.1780.0610.000.3130 Pudgy the Piglet $49.00 Check Total: $136.40 83627 05/12/2015 1148 Ace Hardware of Greeley 056427 10.331.00.2640.0610.000.0000 Supplies Maintenance $12.59 83627 05/12/2015 1148 Ace Hardware of Greeley 056515 10.331.00.2620.0614.000.0000 Maint. -
Let's Repair the Broken Galileo Thermometer
c e p s Journal | Vol.8 | No1 | Year 2018 77 doi: 10.26529/cepsj.320 Let’s Repair the Broken Galileo Thermometer Marián Kireš1 • We have developed and verified laboratory work as guided inquiry for upper secondary level students, focusing on conceptual understand- ing of the physical principle that forms the basis of temperature meas- urement, and on improvement of selected skills. Conceptual pre-test questions initiate the students’ interest and help identify input miscon- ceptions. Using the method of interactive lecture demonstration, the students are introduced to the measurement principles of the Galileo thermometer. The students are then set the problem of how to repair a broken thermometer when tap water is used instead of ethanol. Since the density of water is greater than that of ethanol, the buoys must be adjusted by the students to achieve correct temperature measurement. The next steps of the activity have a hands-on orientation. The students work in pairs, guided by worksheet instructions. At the end of the activ- ity, they complete self-assessment rubrics focused on skill improvement and final conceptual understanding. The results of the conceptual pre- test questions and of the self-assessment rubrics from 461 participants are analysed and recommendations are made for teachers. Keywords: conceptual understanding, Galileo thermometer, guided inquiry 1 Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Faculty of Science, Slovakia; [email protected]. 78 let’s repair the broken galileo thermometer Popravimo pokvarjen Galilejev termometer Marián Kireš • Razvili in evalvirali smo laboratorijsko vajo, vključujoč učenje z razisko- vanjem, za dijake, osredinjeno na konceptualno razumevanje fizikalne- ga principa, ki je osnova za merjenje temperature, in na izboljšanje iz- branih veščin. -
5. Galileo Thermometer
Ambient Weather WS-YG901 Galileo Thermometer and Glass Fluid Barometer Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Preparation ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Care and Cleaning ........................................................................................................................... 2 4. Storm Glass Barometer ................................................................................................................... 2 4.1 How the storm glass works .................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Filling the storm glass ............................................................................................................ 3 4.3 Emptying the storm glass ....................................................................................................... 3 5. Galileo Thermometer ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.1 How the Galileo thermometer works ..................................................................................... 4 5.2 How to read the Galileo thermometer .................................................................................... 4 5.3 Galileo thermometer warnings .............................................................................................. -
Evaluation of Ice Detection Systems for Wind Turbines Final Report
Weather Forecasts Renewable Energies Air and Climate Environmental IT Genossenschaft METEOTEST Fabrikstrasse 14, CH-3012 Bern Tel. +41 (0)31 307 26 26 Fax +41 (0)31 307 26 10 [email protected], www.meteotest.ch Bern, February 16, 2016 Evaluation of ice detection systems for wind turbines Final report VGB Research Project No. 392 report_v8_final.docx/rc METEOTEST 2 Disclaimer All information presented in this report is solely based on documents provided by the manufacturers of the ice detection systems as well as publicly available reports, papers and presentations. No data analysis has been carried out by Meteotest for this report. Especially the information on the accuracy of the systems has not been checked or validated by Meteotest or by TÜV NORD. Acknowledgements The research project "Evaluation of ice detection systems for wind turbines" was funded by VGB PowerTech e.V., which is kindly acknowledged. The project was initiated and supervised by the VGB Technical Committee "Wind Energy." The au- thors would like to thank the companies EnBW, Enercity (Stadtwerke Hannover), Energiewerkstatt, ESB Renewables, EVN Naturkraft, Fortech, GDF Suez Canada (now Engie) , GDF Suez Europe (now Engie), RheinEnergie, Vattenfall and WSB Service Deutschland for their active participation in the survey among wind-turbine operators conducted within the project. Finally the authors wish to thank all manu- facturers of ice detection systems for their active and transparent collaboration in the project. Version Date Document Project Number 1 16.02.2016 Final Report 15_025 Editing Name Date Created by René Cattin, Dr. Ulla Heikkilä 22.12.2015 Controlled by Dr. Ulla Heikkilä 23.12.2015 Approved by Dr.