DOCSLIB.ORG

View the Geotechnical Assessment of the Zoning Plan Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View the Geotechnical Assessment of the Zoning Plan Change Matamata Piako District Council Geotechnical Assessment for Zoning Plan Change 10 February 2016 This page has been left intentionally blank Geotechnical Assessment for Zoning Plan Change Prepared for Matamata Piako District Council Prepared by Coffey Geotechnics (NZ) Ltd 96 Cameron Road, Tauranga Tauranga Central 3110 New Zealand t: +64 7 577 4288 10 February 2016 GENZTAUC16120AA-AB Quality information Revision history Revision Description Date Originator Reviewer Approver 2 Final Report 10/02/2016 SWH DAS DAS Distribution Report Status No. of copies Format Distributed to Date Final Report 1 PDF Matamata Piako District Council 10/02/2016 i Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Scope and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 3. Data and References ............................................................................................................. 2 4. Geotechnical Assessment ...................................................................................................... 4 4.1. Site 1 – Tui Road, Te Aroha ......................................................................................... 4 4.1.1. Site Description ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.2. Site History ...................................................................................................... 5 4.1.3. Geology ........................................................................................................... 5 4.1.4. Liquefaction ..................................................................................................... 6 4.1.5. Flooding Hazard............................................................................................... 6 4.1.6. Slope Stability .................................................................................................. 8 4.1.7. Site Observation .............................................................................................. 8 4.2. Site 2 – Stirling Street, Te Aroha................................................................................... 9 4.2.1. Site Description ................................................................................................ 9 4.2.2. Site History .................................................................................................... 10 4.2.3. Geology ......................................................................................................... 10 4.2.4. Liquefaction ................................................................................................... 11 4.2.5. Flooding Hazard............................................................................................. 11 4.2.6. Slope Stability ................................................................................................ 12 4.2.7. Site Observation ............................................................................................ 13 4.3. Site 3 – Tower Road, Matamata ................................................................................. 14 4.3.1. Site Description .............................................................................................. 14 4.3.2. Site History .................................................................................................... 15 4.3.3. Geology ......................................................................................................... 15 4.3.4. Liquefaction ................................................................................................... 16 4.3.5. Flooding Hazard............................................................................................. 16 4.3.6. Slope Stability ................................................................................................ 16 4.3.7. Site Observation ............................................................................................ 16 4.4. Site 4 – State Highway 24 (Tauranga Road), Matamata.............................................. 17 4.4.1. Site Description .............................................................................................. 17 4.4.2. Site History .................................................................................................... 18 4.4.3. Geology ......................................................................................................... 18 4.4.4. Liquefaction ................................................................................................... 19 4.4.5. Flooding Hazard............................................................................................. 19 ii 4.4.6. Slope Stability ................................................................................................ 19 4.4.7. Site Observation ............................................................................................ 19 4.5. Site 5 – Horrell Road, Morrinsville ............................................................................... 20 4.5.1. Site Description .............................................................................................. 20 4.5.2. Site History .................................................................................................... 22 4.5.3. Geology ......................................................................................................... 22 4.5.4. Liquefaction ................................................................................................... 23 4.5.5. Static Settlement ............................................................................................ 23 4.5.6. Flooding Hazard............................................................................................. 23 4.5.7. Slope Stability ................................................................................................ 23 4.5.8. Site Observation ............................................................................................ 24 5. Summary ............................................................................................................................. 24 6. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 25 7. Limitations............................................................................................................................ 25 Tables Table 1: Records of boreholes drilled within and near Site 5 Figures Figure 1: Site 1 Location Plan Figure 2: Site 1 Council Zoning Map Figure 3: Site 1 Flood Hazard Survey Map Figure 4: Site 2 Location Plan Figure 5: Site 2 Council Zoning Map Figure 6: Site 2 Flood Hazard Survey Map Figure 7: Site 3 Location Plan Figure 8: Site 3 Council Zoning Map Figure 9: Site 4 Location Plan Figure 10: Site 4 Council Zoning Map Figure 11: Site 5 Location Plan Figure 12: Site 5 Council Zoning Map iii Appendices Appendix A - Photographs Appendix B – Definitions iv Geotechnical Assessment for Zoning Plan Change 1. Introduction Coffey Geotechnics (NZ) Limited (Coffey) has been engaged by Matamata Piako District Council (MPDC) to carry out a geotechnical assessment of five sites within Matamata, Morrinsville and Te Aroha. This scope of this report includes combining the findings of our desktop study and site observation to assess the adequacy of the sites for land-use changes. The report has been prepared in general accordance with the agreed Coffey Geotechnics services proposal1 and is considered to be appropriate for use as one of the supporting documents for a Plan Change application. 2. Scope and Objectives We understand that MPDC require a preliminary geotechnical assessment to support a plan change of the following five sites: 1. Tui Road, Te Aroha (Rezoning from Rural Residential to Residential) 2. Stirling Street, Te Aroha (Rezoning from Rural Residential to Residential) 3. Tower Road, Matamata (Rezoning from Rural to Residential) 4. State Highway 24 (Tauranga Road), Matamata (Rezoning from Rural to Industrial) 5. Horrell Road, Morrinsville (Rezoning from Rural to Rural Residential) With this purpose, the scope of the work was to: undertake a desktop study to review available Council information on hazards and geotechnical data, Council plan maps and any other information available; undertake a site observation from the perimeter of the five sites; assess the potential geotechnical constraints to the development of the sites; prepare a plan change report in line with MPDC requirements. 1 “Geotechnical Services Proposal for District Plan Review”, dated 10 December 2015, Reference: GENZTAUC16120AA-AA Coffey Geotechnics GENZTAUC16120AA-AB 1 10 February 2016 Geotechnical Assessment for Zoning Plan Change 3. Data and References MPDC provided Coffey with the following council records for the assessment: LIM Reports Land Information Memorandum for 47 Tui Road Te Aroha 3320, Reference: 05311/478.00- 8469, dated 6 June 2012. Land Information Memorandum for 121 Horrell Road RD 4 Morrinsville 3374, Reference: 05305/313.02-26239, dated 11 April 2012. Land Information Memorandum for 107 Horrell Road RD 4 Morrinsville 3374, Reference: 05305/313.04-33674, dated 20 July 2012. Land Information Memorandum for 2997 State Highway 26, RD4, Morrinsville, Reference: 05305/305.00, dated 30 March 2001. Matamata-Piako District
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hauraki Plains
    3--43 Hon. Mr. MeLeod. HAURAKI PLAINS. ANALYSIS. 11. Minister of Finance authorized to raise £900,000 Title. for purposes of this Act. 1. Short Title and commencement. 12. Minister mey levy maintenance and ad- 2. Interpretatioh. ministration rate. 3. Appointment of Engineer and other officers. 13. Lands liable to rate. Rate to be on a 4. Land subject to Act. To be made fit for graduated scale. Classification of lands. settlement. 14. Lands subject to this Act, with certain ex- 5. Provisions of Land Act as to payments for ceptions, to be exempt from general road-making and timber royalties, &6., not county rates. to apply. 13. Minister may sell or lease certain wharve, 6. Sale or lease to be with consent of Minister. jetties, &0., to any local authority, &e. 7. Governoradjacent - lands.General may take or purchase 16.17. Additional Construction, powers maintenance, of Minister. and repair of 8. Hauraki Plains Settlement Account esta- party drains. blished. 18. Offences. 9. MoneysAccount. payable to Hauraki Plains Settlement 19.20. Regulations.Annual report to be submitted to Parliament. 10. Moneysment Account.payable out of Hauraki Plains Settle- 21. RepealsSchedules. and savings. A BILL INTITULED AN AcT to consolidate and amend the Law relating to the Settlement Title. of the Haurald Plains. BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand 6 in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows :- 1. This Act may be cited as the Hauraki Plains Act, 1926, and Short Title and commencement. shall come into force on the first day of April, nineteen hundred and twenty-seven.
    [Show full text]
  • Eta Mokena, Daughter of Mokena Hou, and Her Husband, Hare Renata
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato ETA MOKENA, DAUGHTER OF MOKENA HOU, AND HER HUSBAND, HARE RENATA Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 37 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 ETA MOKENA, DAUGHTER OF MOKENA HOU, AND HER HUSBAND, HARE RENATA Abstract: The family backgrounds of both Eta Mokena and Hare Renata can be traced, but little is known about her life compared with that of her husband. From an early age he lived in various places in Hauraki, cultivating, running pigs, catching birds, fish, and eels, and selling some of these to Pakeha. Both owned interests in several blocks of land, and Eta, being childless, gifted some interests to her nephew and nieces. Hare Renata had to fight off other claimants for several blocks of land, not always successfully, and not always by giving truthful evidence. Despite selling some of their interests in land, they were never financially secure. Renata held interests in three goldfields whereas Eta held only one, in a claim named after her family. They settled in several places, and only rarely lived at Te Aroha until their last years. AGES AND WHAKAPAPA Eta Mokena was the third child and first daughter of Mokena Hou and Rina.1 If her age was recorded accurately when she died, she was born in 1848.2 If she gave her age correctly when being treated by a doctor, she was born either in 1850 or 1851.3 Her whakapapa is given in the paper on Mokena Hou and Rina.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites
    Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites (SIS) – 2013 version Available for download from http://www.eaaflyway.net/nominating-a-site.php#network Categories approved by Second Meeting of the Partners of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership in Beijing, China 13-14 November 2007 - Report (Minutes) Agenda Item 3.13 Notes for compilers: 1. The management body intending to nominate a site for inclusion in the East Asian - Australasian Flyway Site Network is requested to complete a Site Information Sheet. The Site Information Sheet will provide the basic information of the site and detail how the site meets the criteria for inclusion in the Flyway Site Network. 2. The Site Information Sheet is based on the Ramsar Information Sheet. If the site proposed for the Flyway Site Network is an existing Ramsar site then the documentation process can be simplified. 3. Once completed, the Site Information Sheet (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Flyway Partnership Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the Information Sheet and, where possible, digital versions (e.g. shapefile) of all maps. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Name and contact details of the compiler of this form: Full name: KEITH WOODLEY EAAF SITE CODE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Institution/agency: Pukorokoro Miranda Naturalists’ Trust Address : 283 East Coast Road RD3 Pokeno 2473 E A A F 0 1 9 Telephone:09 2322781 Fax numbers: E-mail address:[email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed: October 2014 1 Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites 3.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPING the TE AROHA DISTRICT UNTIL C.1910
    DEVELOPING THE TE AROHA DISTRICT UNTIL c.1910 Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 7 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 DEVELOPING THE TE AROHA DISTRICT UNTIL c.1910 Abstract: When the Aroha Block was opened to Pakeha settlers, they found what to them was a wilderness with a great potential. Some of those seeking farms were miners, and as mining faded they encouraged the government to establish special farm settlements for them. But before the land’s potential could be tapped, it had to be surveyed, purchased from the Crown (often using the deferred payment scheme, as at Te Aroha West), and drained, a process fraught with difficulties and, it was charged, incompetence. Some land speculators were attracted to the district because the new goldfield provided a market for produce. As it took years to construct good roads, the Waihou River was the main means of moving people and produce. Once the river was snagged and the swamps were drained, a new problem arose: silting, solved for a time by planting willows along its banks. Over time, bridges replaced punts, and in 1886 the railway arrived. After surviving harsh conditions when developing their land, farmers were able to provide a wide range of agricultural produce to local and regional markets. Kauri gum was dug, fleetingly, and the flax industry waxed and waned, but the arrival of dairying in the 1890s was an important step forward in the successful development of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan SUMMARY Document – December 2020 1
    Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan SUMMARY Document – December 2020 1 1 INFORMATION Document Reference 2021 Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan Sport Waikato (Lead), Members of Waikato Local Authorities (including Mayors, Chief Executives and Technical Managers), Sport New Zealand, Waikato Regional Sports Organisations, Waikato Education Providers Contributing Parties Steering Group; Lance Vervoort, Garry Dyet, Gavin Ion and Don McLeod representing Local Authorities, Jamie Delich, Sport New Zealand, Matthew Cooper, Amy Marfell, Leanne Stewart and Rebecca Thorby, Sport Waikato. 2014 Plan: Craig Jones, Gordon Cessford, Visitor Solutions Contributing Authors 2018 Plan: Robyn Cockburn, Lumin 2021 Plan: Robyn Cockburn, Lumin Sign off Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan Advisory Group Version Draft 2021 Document Date February 2021 Special Thanks: To stakeholders across Local Authorities, Education, Iwi, Regional and National Sports Organisations, Recreation and Funding partners who were actively involved in the review of the 2021 Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan. To Sport Waikato, who have led the development of this 2021 plan and Robyn Cockburn, Lumin, who has provided expert guidance and insight, facilitating the development of this plan. Disclaimer: Information, data and general assumptions used in the compilation of this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The contributing parties, led by Sport Waikato, have used this information in good faith and make no warranties or representations, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of this information. Interested parties should perform their own investigations, analysis and projections on all issues prior to acting in any way with regard to this project. All proposed facility approaches made within this document are developed in consultation with the contributing parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Matamata-Piako District Council Is Fortunate Enough to Be a Land Locked District
    MATAMATA PIAKO MŌHIOHIO ANŌ MŌ TE RAPU WHAKAARO KI TE RAUTAKINGA TŪROA 2021-2031 | UNDERLYING INFORMATION FOR CONSULTATION ON THE LONG TERM PLAN 2021 - 2031 CONTENTS YOUR PAGE FINDER 4 SECTION 1: HE KUPU WHAKATAKI | INTRODUCTION 12 SECTION 2: RAUTAKI Ā -PŪTEA | FINANCIAL STRATEGY 33 SECTION 3: RAUTAKI Ā-HANGANGA | INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY 69 SECTION 4: NGĀ WHAKATATAU MATUA | KEY ASSUMPTIONS 69 SECTION 5: TŌ TĀTOU ROHE, ŌHANGA, TAUPORI HOKI | OUR District, ECONOMY AND POPULATION 79 SECTION 6: Ā MĀTOU MAHI | WHAT WE DO 232 SECTION 7: TE PŪTEA | FINANCIALS 268 SECTION 8: NGĀ KAUPAPAHERE | POLICIES 280 SECTION 9: NGĀ WHAKAWHANAUNGATANGA MATUA | KEY RELATIONSHIPS 290 SECTION 10: TE AROTAKENGA | AUDIT OPINION ISSN 1170-5779 (Print) ISSN 1178-9735 (Online) HE KUPU WHAKATAKI INTRODUCTION SECTION 1: HE KUPU WHAKATAKI | INTRODUCTION 5 WELCOME A MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR Council has been working on a plan for the next 10 years for several We’re tackling the issues, but we also have some really exciting months, taking a hard look at what needs to be done to help our proposals included over the next 10 years, like revitalising our district move forward. main streets, and planning ahead for recreation facilities - including an additional indoor stadium for Matamata and re-development of Council signed off the LTP and consultation document for public the Morrinsville pool. Projects that will help make our community a consultation, with a total rates increase in the first year of 11.85%. more vibrant, thriving place. This means Council would collect 11.85% more from rates than in We’re also proposing to develop a new day spa in Te Aroha, starting 2020/21, but 1.5% of that is expected to be covered by new ratepayers, with a plan that will allow us to stage the project in a cost effective as the district is continuing to experience strong growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerepehi Fault Earthquake Primary Sector Workshop Report
    Hauraki District Council: Kerepehi Fault Earthquake Primary Sector Workshop Report Prepared for Steve Fabish Community Services Manager, Hauraki District Council 9 November 2015 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF WORKSHOP ............................................................................................................. 3 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS ................................................................................................. 3 KEREPEHI FAULT EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS AND RISKS ................................................................... 3 CIVIL DEFENCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (CDEM) ARRANGEMENTS ......................................... 4 AGENCY ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 4 GROUP SESSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 5 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................. 5 SESSION 1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 5 SESSION 2 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 6 WORKSHOP FEEDBACK SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 8 WORKSHOP FOLLOW-UP .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE [No
    752 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE [No. 18 SECOND SCHEDULE sidff of its intersection with the Morrinsville-Rotorua Railway BOUNDARIES OF THE MAUNGAKAWA RABBIT DISTRICT aforesaid; thence south-westerly generally along the northern side of the said railway to a point in line with the south-eastern boundary ALL that area in the Auckland Land District, Waikato and Piako of Lot 1 as shown on. the plan numbered 31856, deposited as afore­ Counties, situated in Blocks XIV and XV, Maungakawa Survey said, being part Section 15s, Pakarau Settlement, across the said District, and Blocks I, II, III, V, VI, and VII, Cambridge Survey railway, aud along the south-eastern boundary of Lot I aforesaid District, bounded by a line commencing at the Pukemoremore Trig. to the right bank of the Piakoiti Stream ; thence along the right Station in Block I, Cambridge Survey District aforesaid, and bank of the said Piakoiti Stream to its junction with the Fiakonui running north-easterly generally along the south-eastern boundaries Stream ; thence southerly generally to and along the left bank of of Karokaro Nos. A 2, C, and B Blocks and the southern boundary the said Piakonui Stream, to and along the western boundary of of part Tahuroa No. 1 Block to the south-western corner of Sec­ Te Pae O Tu Rawaro No. 2 No. 2B Block, across a public road, tion 72s, Te Miro Settlement; thence again north-easterly along and again along the western boundary of Te Pae O Tu Rawaro a right line to Tutaenui Trig. Station at the we&tern corner of No 2 No.
    [Show full text]
  • RA2 Coastal Case Study
    Climate Changes, Impacts and Implications for New Zealand to 2100 Synthesis Report: RA2 Coastal Case Study The Firth of Thames and Lower Waihou River G McBride1, G Reeve1, M Pritchard1, C Lundquist1, A Daigneault2, R Bell1, P Blackett1, A Swales1, S Wadhwa1, A Tait3, C Zammit4 1 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand 2 Landcare Research Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 3National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand 4National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] PSConsulting Ltd Present-day LiDAR bathymetry of the Firth of Thames intertidal zone, overlaid by mangrove distribution © All rights reserved. The copyright and all other intellectual property rights in this report remain vested solely in the organisation(s) listed in the author affiliation list. The organisation(s) listed in the author affiliation list make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of the information in this report, the use to which this report may be put or the results to be obtained from the use of this report. Accordingly the organisation(s) listed in the author affiliation list accept no liability for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) incurred by any person through the use of or reliance on this report, and the user shall bear and shall indemnify and hold the organisation(s) listed in the author affiliation list harmless from and against all losses, claims, demands, liabilities, suits or actions (including reasonable legal fees) in connection with access and use of this report to whomever or how so ever caused.
    [Show full text]
  • A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand
    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand WAIKATO CONSERVANCY Lower Waikato River and Estuary (10) Location: Rangiriri, 37°26'S, 175°08'E; centre of delta, 37°21'S, 174°46'E. The Lower Waikato River is approximately 34 km southwest of the city of Auckland at Port Waikato and 72 km south of the city of Auckland at Rangiriri, North Island. Area: Lower Waikato River, c.3,500 ha (56 km from Rangiriri to Port Waikato); estuary c.588 ha. Altitude: Sea level to 10 m at Rangiriri. Overview: The Waikato River, between Rangiriri and Port Waikato, passes through large areas of mineralised swamp and shallow lakes, and finally discharges through a diverse delta habitat to the sea. It provides habitat for a range of threatened bird species, and supports New Zealand's largest eel fishery. Physical features: The site comprises the Lower Waikato River from Rangiriri downstream for about 56 km to Port Waikato at its mouth. The basement rocks of the Waikato Region are comprised of Mesozoic "greywacke-type" rocks that have undergone extensive alteration to form dissected fault blocks around the perimeter of the Waikato catchment. During the early Tertiary, coal measures with associated freshwater and shallow marine sediments were laid down, although today many have been removed by erosion. Following this period, a series of several different phases of volcanism occurred. As a result of extensive sediment deposition at this time, the Waikato River, which previously flowed out to the Firth of Thames, changed course to flow out into the Hamilton Basin, bringing much sediment with it and causing extensive deposition and creating small lakes and swamps.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAN CHANGE 48 Appendix C Proposed Changes to Schedule 3
    Page | 40 PLAN CHANGE 48 Appendix C Proposed Changes to Schedule 3 Page | 41 Schedule 3: Outstanding or significant natural features and trees and other protected items See Appendix 1 for evaluation criteria Reg no Location Common names Map no Legal description 1 Aitken Homestead Gingko, Sweet Chestnut, Macrocarpa, Radiata Pine, Silver 8 Part Lot 2 DP 13021 Maungakawa Road Birch, Eucalyptus, Phoenix Palm, Oaks, Silver Fir, Kereone Liquidamber and Redwoods 2 Near Aitken Homestead Cork Oak 8 Lot 1 DPS 24698 Maungakawa Road Kereone 3 Both banks Waitoa River west of Ngarua Lowland Bush 8 Pakarau Pa Block A2 and Part SW 6 Block VIII Memorial Hall Maungakawa SD State Highway 27 Ngarua 4 North of Walton Road at junction with State Kahikatea Lowland Forest 11 Section 23 block VIII, Wairere SD Highway 27 5 State Highway 27/Wairere Road Stand of Kahikatea 11 Part Section 1 & Matamata North, Part 2B1 A2 and 3A block VIII, Wairere SD and Part Lot 2 DPS 12032 6 Walton School Red Oaks 39 Part DP 915A and All DPS 3403, DP 8523, DP 14538 Walton 7 Walton Village Copper Beech 11 Part Lot 2 DP 27651 Walton 7/1 Walton Village Kauri 39 Part Lot 2 DP 27651 Walton 8 Walton Village Sycamore 11 Part Lot 1 DP 7329 Walton 9 Wardville School Tanekaha, Japanese Cedar, Sycamore, Holly, Totara (3), 12 Part Lot 9 DP 2838, and Part Lot 9 DP 4223 Wardville Liquid Amber, Memorial Ginkgo, Kauri 10 Walker/Mills Streets Kahikatea Bush 31 Part Lots 1 and 2 DP 13299, Part 9A DP 850 Lots 1 and 2 Waharoa DPS 26844, Section 77 block XIII Wairere SD and Lot 2 LTS 39444 11 Banks
    [Show full text]
  • 17 GEO V 1926 No 39 Hauraki Plains
    498 1926, No. 39.1 Hauraki Pla1:n8. [17 GEO. V. -------------------- ----------- -~----- New Zealancl. ANALYSIS. I 11. Ministprof Finance authorized to raise £900,000 Title. for purposes of this Act. 1. Short Title and commencement. 12. Minister may levy maintenance and admi­ 2. Interpretation. nistration rate. 3. Appointment of Engineer and other officers. 13. Lands liable to rate. Rate to be on a 4. Land subject to Ad. To be made fit for graduated scale. Classification of lands. settlement. 14. Lands subject to this Act, with certain ex­ 5. Provisions of Land Act as to payments for ceptions, to be exempt from general county road-making and timber royalties, &c., not rates. to apply. 15. Minister may sell or lease certain wharveR, 6. Sale or lease to be with consent of Minister. jetties, &c., to any local authority, &c. 7. Governor - General may take or purchase 16. Additional powers of Minister. adjacent lands. 17. Construction, maintenance, and repair of 8. Hauraki Plains Settlement Account esta­ party drains. blished. 18. Offences. 9. Moneys payable to Hauraki Plains Settlement 19. Regulations. Account. 20. Annual report to be submitted to Parliament. 10. Moneys payable out of Hauraki Plains Settle­ 21. Repeals and savings. ment Account. Schedules. 1926, No. 39. Title. AN ACT to consolidate and amend the Law relating to the Settlement of the Hauraki Plains. [9th September, 1926. BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows :- Short Title and 1. This Act may be cited as the Hauraki Plains Act, 1926, and commencement.
    [Show full text]