The Glorious Revolution Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Glorious Revolution Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jonathan Morris,Nigel Fairs,Andrew Fettes,Frazer Hines | none | 31 Aug 2009 | Big Finish Productions Ltd | 9781844354252 | English | Maidenhead, United Kingdom The Glorious Revolution PDF Book William of Orange assembled an impressive armada for the invasion and landed in Torbay, Devon, in November As collective bodies of indefinite life, however, Parliament and political parties have longer time horizons than an individual, so reputation has better chance of fostering credibility. Later that year, the king formally dissolved his Parliament and attempted to create a new Parliament that would support him unconditionally. Supporters of James, known as Jacobites , were prepared to resist what they saw as an illegal coup by force of arms. The revolution also failed to limit the power of parliaments and created no body of protected constitutional law. Italian unification Meiji Restoration. University of St. To make matters worse, the main Dutch trading and banking houses moved much of their activity from Amsterdam to London after Retrieved 13 February As a former naval commander, James appreciated the difficulties of a successful invasion, even in good weather; as they neared the end of September, the likelihood seemed to diminish. At this point, with the English fleet in pursuit, Russell told Burnet: "You may go to prayers, Doctor. They were also to maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the Gospel, and the Protestant Reformed faith established by law. By , Tories, worried about the Church of England, and Whigs, worried about the independence of Parliament, agreed that they needed to unite against James II. With a European war inevitable, securing or neutralising English resources was vital for both the Dutch and French. Pressure from William also ensured the passage in May of the Toleration Act, granting many Protestant groups, but not Catholics, freedom of worship. The intense political struggle left a fund of theory and experience on which 18th-century statesmen could draw. If no Roman Catholic could be king, then no kingship could be unconditional. The financial and economic importance of the arrangement between William and Mary and Parliament was that the commitments embodied in the constitutional monarchy of the Glorious Revolution were more credible that the commitments under the Restoration constitution North and Weingast His right to do so was not challenged, but Farmer was ineligible under the college statutes, and John Hough was elected instead. William duly began preparations. After suspending Parliament in November , he sought to rule by decree or 'dispense'; judges who disagreed were dismissed and his right confirmed in April William had already begun making military preparations for an invasion of England before this letter was sent. The overthrow of James was hailed at the time and ever since as a "revolution", and the name of "Glorious Revolution" was popularized by Protestant preachers two decades later. Because those companies were created by Parliamentary authorization and held large quantities of government debt, changes in confidence were reflected in changes in their stock prices. Despite his Catholicism, when James became king in his position seemed secure, as demonstrated by the rapid defeat of the Argyll and Monmouth Rebellions ; less than four years later, he was forced into exile. The Lords rejected the proposal for a regency in James's name by 51 to 48 on 2 February. The birth of his son in June raised the likelihood of a Catholic heir to the throne and helped bring discontent to a head. As a consequence of the stalemate, Charles did not summon Parliament over the final years of his life, and James did succeed to the throne in In addition, James frequently made things worse by an inability to accept opposition. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Tolerance was viewed as undermining this principle and Parliament refused to approve, despite being "the most Loyal Parliament a Stuart ever had". By fleeing, James ultimately helped resolve the awkward question of whether he was still the legal king or not, having created according to many a situation of interregnum. After this event, the monarchy in England would never hold absolute power again. Five of the seven bishops prosecuted in refused to swear allegiance to William and Mary, because they felt bound by their previous oath. Politics Law. The Bill of Rights also guaranteed certain rights to all English subjects, including trial by jury and habeas corpus the requirement that authorities bring an imprisoned person before a court to demonstrate the cause of the imprisonment. The next day, the two Houses entered into a conference but failed to resolve the matter. There was still, within living memory, the pain and chaos of civil war , and a return to the bloody mess that had previously put a Stuart king back on the throne was not desired, simply to oust another! The English Convention Parliament was very divided on the issue. In general, the mood was one of confusion, mutual distrust and depression. On 18 May the new Parliament allowed William to declare war on France. Additionally, it forbade the monarchy from being Catholic. William brought over 11, horse and foot. A more contentious argument is that the constitutional changes made property rights more secure and thus promoted economic development. He took heart at this and attempted to recommence government, even presiding over a meeting of the Privy Council. Secondly, James lineage was called into question. William, who wished to bring England into his war against France, responded. Recall that Charles II defaulted on his debts in an attempt to subvert the constitution, and, in contrast, Parliament after the Glorious Revolution generously financed wars for monarchs who abided by the constitution. Farmer withdrew, and Hough was replaced by the Bishop of Oxford , but James also demanded that the fellows apologise for 'defying' him; when they refused, they were replaced by Catholics. Moreover, to free the money needed to launch his scheme, Charles stopped servicing many of his debts in an act called the Stop of the Exchequer, and, in Machiavellian fashion, Charles isolated a few bankers to take the loss Roseveare The Glorious Revolution Writer Really a Revolution? Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. But he let it be known that he was happy for Mary to be nominal monarch and preference in the succession given to Anne's children over his by a subsequent marriage. If no Roman Catholic could be king, then no kingship could be unconditional. Parliamentary authority necessary to impose and collect new taxes. After a bloody skirmish at Reading in December , James realised his cause was lost. Again, the Treaty of Ryswick greatly increased stock prices and confirms a substantial increase in the credibility of the government Wells and Wills , News of James's flight led to celebrations and anti-Catholic riots in Edinburgh and Glasgow. A difficulty with credibility is foreseeing future options. Next article. He was extremely dismayed by the arrival of Lord Feversham. For an explanation of these changes in calendar and dating styles, see Old Style and New Style dates. Explore the British History Timeline from the Neolithic to the present day. Convinced that his army was unreliable, he sent orders to disband it. In Ireland, Richard Talbot, 1st Earl of Tyrconnell led local Catholics, who had been discriminated against by previous English monarchs, in the conquest of all the fortified places in the kingdom except Derry , and so held the Kingdom for James. When the English and Scottish Parliaments refused to repeal the and Test Acts , he dismissed them and ruled by decree. Oliver Cromwell Oliver Cromwell was a political and military leader in 17th century England who served as Lord Protector, or head of state, of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland for a five-year-period until his death in As a result, the Glorious Revolution constitution made credible the enduring ascendancy of Parliament. This meant that the crown would pass to his brother, James, Duke of York, whose conversion to Catholicism had become public knowledge in Having England as an ally meant that the military situation of the Republic was strongly improved, but this very fact induced William to be uncompromising in his position towards France. Please read our Copyright Information page for important copyright information. The overthrow of James was hailed at the time and ever since as a "revolution", and the name of "Glorious Revolution" was popularized by Protestant preachers two decades later. The Glorious Revolution provided a shared experience for those who lived through the tumult of and Even those who invited William were not always certain that usurping the monarch was the correct course of action. In the s, the dispute turned into civil war. The Prince answered, that, if he was invited by some men of the best interest, and the most valued in the nation, who should both in their own name, and in the name of others who trusted them, invite him to come and rescue the nation and the religion, he believed he could be ready by the end of September to come over. On 8 December William met at last with James's representatives; he agreed to James's proposals but also demanded that all Catholics be immediately dismissed from state functions and that England pay for the Dutch military expenses. The Glorious Revolution Reviews The radical Whigs in the Lower House proposed to elect William as a king meaning that his power would be derived from the people ; the moderates wanted an acclamation of William and Mary together; the Tories wanted to make him regent or only acclaim Mary as queen. Thus he landed far away from James's army, expecting that his English allies would take the initiative in acting against James while he ensured his own protection against potential attacks.
Recommended publications
  • Brycheiniog Vol 42:44036 Brycheiniog 2005 28/2/11 10:18 Page 1
    68531_Brycheiniog_Vol_42:44036_Brycheiniog_2005 28/2/11 10:18 Page 1 BRYCHEINIOG Cyfnodolyn Cymdeithas Brycheiniog The Journal of the Brecknock Society CYFROL/VOLUME XLII 2011 Golygydd/Editor BRYNACH PARRI Cyhoeddwyr/Publishers CYMDEITHAS BRYCHEINIOG A CHYFEILLION YR AMGUEDDFA THE BRECKNOCK SOCIETY AND MUSEUM FRIENDS 68531_Brycheiniog_Vol_42:44036_Brycheiniog_2005 28/2/11 10:18 Page 2 CYMDEITHAS BRYCHEINIOG a CHYFEILLION YR AMGUEDDFA THE BRECKNOCK SOCIETY and MUSEUM FRIENDS SWYDDOGION/OFFICERS Llywydd/President Mr K. Jones Cadeirydd/Chairman Mr J. Gibbs Ysgrifennydd Anrhydeddus/Honorary Secretary Miss H. Gichard Aelodaeth/Membership Mrs S. Fawcett-Gandy Trysorydd/Treasurer Mr A. J. Bell Archwilydd/Auditor Mrs W. Camp Golygydd/Editor Mr Brynach Parri Golygydd Cynorthwyol/Assistant Editor Mr P. W. Jenkins Curadur Amgueddfa Brycheiniog/Curator of the Brecknock Museum Mr N. Blackamoor Pob Gohebiaeth: All Correspondence: Cymdeithas Brycheiniog, Brecknock Society, Amgueddfa Brycheiniog, Brecknock Museum, Rhodfa’r Capten, Captain’s Walk, Aberhonddu, Brecon, Powys LD3 7DS Powys LD3 7DS Ôl-rifynnau/Back numbers Mr Peter Jenkins Erthyglau a llyfrau am olygiaeth/Articles and books for review Mr Brynach Parri © Oni nodir fel arall, Cymdeithas Brycheiniog a Chyfeillion yr Amgueddfa piau hawlfraint yr erthyglau yn y rhifyn hwn © Except where otherwise noted, copyright of material published in this issue is vested in the Brecknock Society & Museum Friends 68531_Brycheiniog_Vol_42:44036_Brycheiniog_2005 28/2/11 10:18 Page 3 CYNNWYS/CONTENTS Swyddogion/Officers
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Britain Become a Republic? > New Government
    Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Why did Britain become a republic? Case study 2: New government Even today many people are not aware that Britain was ever a republic. After Charles I was put to death in 1649, a monarch no longer led the country. Instead people dreamed up ideas and made plans for a different form of government. Find out more from these documents about what happened next. Report on the An account of the Poem on the arrest of setting up of the new situation in Levellers, 1649 Commonwealth England, 1649 Portrait & symbols of Cromwell at the The setting up of Cromwell & the Battle of the Instrument Commonwealth Worcester, 1651 of Government http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Page 1 Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Case study 2: New government - Source 1 A report on the arrest of some Levellers, 29 March 1649 (Catalogue ref: SP 25/62, pp.134-5) What is this source? This is a report from a committee of MPs to Parliament. It explains their actions against the leaders of the Levellers. One of the men they arrested was John Lilburne, a key figure in the Leveller movement. What’s the background to this source? Before the war of the 1640s it was difficult and dangerous to come up with new ideas and try to publish them. However, during the Civil War censorship was not strongly enforced. Many political groups emerged with new ideas at this time. One of the most radical (extreme) groups was the Levellers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwelliana 2012
    CROMWELLIANA 2012 Series III No 1 Editor: Dr Maxine Forshaw CONTENTS Editor’s Note 2 Cromwell Day 2011: Oliver Cromwell – A Scottish Perspective 3 By Dr Laura A M Stewart Farmer Oliver? The Cultivation of Cromwell’s Image During 18 the Protectorate By Dr Patrick Little Oliver Cromwell and the Underground Opposition to Bishop 32 Wren of Ely By Dr Andrew Barclay From Civilian to Soldier: Recalling Cromwell in Cambridge, 44 1642 By Dr Sue L Sadler ‘Dear Robin’: The Correspondence of Oliver Cromwell and 61 Robert Hammond By Dr Miranda Malins Mrs S C Lomas: Cromwellian Editor 79 By Dr David L Smith Cromwellian Britain XXIV : Frome, Somerset 95 By Jane A Mills Book Reviews 104 By Dr Patrick Little and Prof Ivan Roots Bibliography of Books 110 By Dr Patrick Little Bibliography of Journals 111 By Prof Peter Gaunt ISBN 0-905729-24-2 EDITOR’S NOTE 2011 was the 360th anniversary of the Battle of Worcester and was marked by Laura Stewart’s address to the Association on Cromwell Day with her paper on ‘Oliver Cromwell: a Scottish Perspective’. ‘Risen from Obscurity – Cromwell’s Early Life’ was the subject of the study day in Huntingdon in October 2011 and three papers connected with the day are included here. Reflecting this subject, the cover illustration is the picture ‘Cromwell on his Farm’ by Ford Madox Brown (1821–1893), painted in 1874, and reproduced here courtesy of National Museums Liverpool. The painting can be found in the Lady Lever Art Gallery in Port Sunlight Village, Wirral, Cheshire. In this edition of Cromwelliana, it should be noted that the bibliography of journal articles covers the period spring 2009 to spring 2012, addressing gaps in the past couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 English History Anglo Saxon: 450 – 1066 A.D. – Mixed With
    Chapter 4 English History Anglo Saxon: 450 – 1066 A.D. – mixed with the natives of the island Native Brits + Germans = rule the Island of England 1066 A.D. – Norman Conquest: William of Normandy France conquers the Island of England (the Anglo Saxons) 1st Norman King – King William I Kings are technically Warlords - to become King you need to kill = own all the land Feudalism King = protection Kings Army (Dukes – Knights) = in charge of making money, make sure the serfs are doing their job Money = Scutage = Tax Serf = work the land Everyone under the King = King’s subjects 1189 – 1199 A.D. – King Richard (Lionheart) died in battle in France Lionheart was part of the 3rd Crusade 1199 – 1216 A.D. King John (Lackland) Tyrant King – abused his power Taxed his nobles relentlessly - 1215 A.D. Baronial Revolt – Nobles rebelled against the King and make him sign a document. They created the Magna Carta (Great Charter) – Gives rights to the Nobles. This lessens the kings power. At this time a middle class is being created, but HOW? This middle class becomes the downfall of feudalism. The middle class is called the Yeoman. (Human bowmen). Went and fought in the war, but got paid. They were smarter and had some money. 1216 – 1272 A.D. King Henry III He was 9 years old when he became King. 1258 – Henry’s cousin, a noble, Simon de Montforte, assembled many of the other Nobles, Knights, and Clergy to create what is now called the House of Lords. The House of Lords represents the nobles/wealthy people.
    [Show full text]
  • History Term 4
    History: Why were Kings back in Fashion by 1660? Year 7 Term 4 Timeline Key Terms Key Questions 1625 Charles I becomes King of England. Civil War A war between people of the same country. What Caused the English Civil War? The Divine Right of Kings — Charles I felt that God had given him Charles closes Parliament. The Eleven Years of This is a belief that the King or Queen is the most 1629 Divine Right of the power to rule and so Parliament should follow his leadership. Tyranny begin. powerful person on earth as God put them into Kings Parliament disagreed with the King over the Divine Right of Kings. power. Parliament believed it should have an important role in running the Charles reopens Parliament in order to raise 1640 country. money for war. Parliament tried to limit the King’s power. Charles responded by Eleven Years Charles I ruled England without Parliament for declaring war on Parliament in 1642. Tyranny eleven years. Charles I attempts to arrest 5 members of 1642 parliament. The English Civil War begins. Why did Parliament Win the War? A government where a King or Queen is the Head of Monarchy 1644 Parliamentarians win the Battle of Marston Moor. State. The New Model Army was created by Parliamentarians in 1645. These soldiers were paid for their services and trained well. 1645 Parliamentarians win the Battle of Naseby. A group in the UK elected by the people. They have Parliament had more money. They controlled the south of England Parliament which was much richer in resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations, 188 Accounts of the Society, 162-3 Aethelred II, Coins Of
    INDEX Abbreviations, 188 COWELL, M.R. and E.M. BESLY, The metrology of the Accounts of the Society, 162-3 English Civil War coinages of Charles I, 57-75 Aethelred II, coins of, 124, 153 CUDDEFORD, M.J., Contributions to the Coin Register, 143, Alnage seals, 31-6 145, 149-50, 155 Aquitaine, coins of, 151-2, 155 Cunobelin, coins of, 144-6 ARCHIBALD, MARION M., Contributions to the Coin Regis- ter, 150-2, 154 DAVIES, J.A., Contributions to the Coin Register, 151-5 — Dating Stephen's first type, 9-22 DICKINSON, M., Contributions to paper by Greenall, 94-120 ATTWOOD, P., Robert Johnson and a railway centenary Dublin mint of Edward I, 23-30 medal, 139-40 DUNGER, G.T., Contributions to the Coin Register, 152,155 Austria, coins of, 88, 136 Eadwald of E. Anglia, coin of, 152 Edinburgh, mint, 126-9 Baldred, coin of, 153 Edward the Elder, coin of, 153 Bar, coin of, 155 Edward the Martyr, coin of, 153 BARBER, P., Review of Woolf's The medallic record of the Edward VI, coins of, 79, 86 Jacobite movement, 156-7 EGAN, G., Alnage seals and the national coinage - some BARCLAY, C.P., A Civil War hoard from Grewelthorpe, parallels in design, 31-6 North Yorkshire, 76-81 Elizabeth I, coins of, 79, 86, 134 — Review of Attwood's British Museum Occasional Paper Eppillus, coins of, 146 76, Acquisitions of Badges (1983-1987), 158 BATESON, J.D., The 1991 Kelso Treasure Trove, 82-9 EEARON, D., Review of Attwood's British Museum Occa- — A late seventeenth century hoard from Fauldhouse, West sional Paper 78, Acquisitions of Medals (1983-1987), Lothian, 133-6 157-8 Bellovaci, coin of, 143 Finds (for single finds, see the geographical index to the Beonna of E.
    [Show full text]
  • In England, Scotland, and Wales: Texts, Purpose, Context, 1138-1530
    Victoria Shirley The Galfridian Tradition(s) in England, Scotland, and Wales: Texts, Purpose, Context, 1138-1530 A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Literature Cardiff University 2017 i Abstract This thesis examines the responses to and rewritings of the Historia regum Britanniae in England, Scotland, and Wales between 1138 and 1530, and argues that the continued production of the text was directly related to the erasure of its author, Geoffrey of Monmouth. In contrast to earlier studies, which focus on single national or linguistic traditions, this thesis analyses different translations and adaptations of the Historia in a comparative methodology that demonstrates the connections, contrasts and continuities between the various national traditions. Chapter One assesses Geoffrey’s reputation and the critical reception of the Historia between the twelfth and sixteenth centuries, arguing that the text came to be regarded as an authoritative account of British history at the same time as its author’s credibility was challenged. Chapter Two analyses how Geoffrey’s genealogical model of British history came to be rewritten as it was resituated within different narratives of English, Scottish, and Welsh history. Chapter Three demonstrates how the Historia’s description of the island Britain was adapted by later writers to construct geographical landscapes that emphasised the disunity of the island and subverted Geoffrey’s vision of insular unity. Chapter Four identifies how the letters between Britain and Rome in the Historia use argumentative rhetoric, myths of descent, and the discourse of freedom to establish the importance of political, national, or geographical independence. Chapter Five analyses how the relationships between the Arthur and his immediate kin group were used to challenge Geoffrey’s narrative of British history and emphasise problems of legitimacy, inheritance, and succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to British History I
    HIST 2403 Introduction to British History I: POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND, FROM THE NORMAN CONQUEST (1066) TO THE RESTORATION (1660) Fall 2009, Room 2082,Tuesday & Thursday, 4:00--5:40 p.m. Instructor: Prof. Ian Gentles Office: Room 1111 Phone: 416-226-6620 ext. 6718 E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Tues. 2:30-3:45, Thurs. 2:30- 3:45, OR by appointment Commuter Hotline: 416-226-6620 ext. 2187 Class cancellations due to inclement weather or illness will be announced/posted on the commuter hotline. Mailboxes: Every student is responsible for information communicated through the student mailboxes. A mailbox directory is posted beside the mailboxes. I. COURSE DESCRIPTION An outline of British history from the Norman conquest to the mid-seventeenth century revolution, this course pays particular attention to the history of monarchy, parliament and the church. Specific topics include the conflict between crown and aristocracy, the rise of parliament, the Reformation and the factors that led to the turbulence of the seventeenth century. II. REQUIRED TEXTS 1. Lehmberg, Stanford E. and Samantha Meigs. The Peoples of the British Isles from Prehistoric Times to 1688 . Chicago: Lyceum, 2009 2. Course Pack: Documents, readings and maps for use in tutorial discussion. (available in the bookstore) III. COURSE EVALUATION Examination : Test - Thursday, 22nd October (in class) 10% Essay - 2,000-2500 words, Thursday, 26 November 30% Examination (during December exam period) 40% Class participation 20% (total) 100% Term work : a. You are expected to attend the tutorials, preparing for them through the lectures and through assigned reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Of BNJ Contents 1903-2016
    CONTENTS OF THE BRITISH NUMISMATIC JOURNAL VOLUMES 1 TO 86 (1903/4 - 2016) Edited for the British Numismatic Society by R. H. Thompson, FSA, MCLIP. 2011-16 Additions by R. Page, MSc, DIC. 2019 © THE BRITISH NUMISMATIC SOCIETY 2011 INTRODUCTION This listing is confined to the principal contributions to the Journal, including short articles and notes, but omitting reviews, exhibitions, and other proceedings of the Society; presidential addresses, however, have been included to the extent that they treat specific subjects. This list does not pretend to be an index; and users may like to note that there are (in addition to the indexes in each volume) cumulated indexes to each series as follows: Volumes 1-10 In vol. 10, pp. 393-402 11-20 20, pp. 397-410 21-30 30, pp. 396-417 31-40 40, pp. 209-239 41-50 50, pp. 161-185 51-60 60, pp.191-209 61-70 70, pp. 203-213. 71-80 81, pp. 319-333 In the references the volume number is given in arabic numerals, the roman numerals of the first fifty volumes being converted into arabic. The year is the titular date of the volume, not the date of publication, nor (where they differ) the years of the proceedings contained in that volume. The numbers of plates given in the references are the pages of illustrations (including charts, facsimiles, and maps) which are additional to the text pages; in Volumes 52-57, and occasionally elsewhere, the plates are incorporated in the numbering of pages. The aim of the subject arrangement is to display the contents under convenient headings, subdivided where references are numerous; and most papers appear in one place only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology of Jury Law-Finding in the Interregnum
    Conscience and the True Law: 5 The Ideology of Jury Law-Finding in the Interregnum The government that tried and condemned Charles I in January, 1649, found later the same year that it was unable to have its way with John Lilburne. As leader of the Levellers, the most imposing of the groups that clashed with the Cromwellian regime, Lilburne appealed to his jurors, in a celebrated phrase, "as judges of law as well as fact. " 1 When the jury acquitted him of treason, this claim to a "jury right"-a right of the jury to decide the law-brought the criminal trial jury for the first time into the forefront of English constitutional and political debate.2 The emergence of a theory of the jury's right to decide the law was not in any simple way a reaction to the transformation of criminal process in early modern England. On the one hand, much of what the radical reformers attacked predated the Tudor period; on the other, much of their program was inspired by the political crisis that accompanied the struggle against the Stuart monarchy .3 Nevertheless, the Leveller attack on the judiciary in criminal cases was a response to the power and behavior of the bench, and that power and behavior were largely owing to new forms of criminal procedure. 1. See below, text at nn. 67-77. On the Levellers see e.g. H. N. Brailsford, The Levellers and the English Revolution (London, 1961); Joseph Frank, The Levellers (Cambridge, Mass., 1955); G. E. Aylmer, ed., The Levellers in the English Revolution (London, 1975), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to London Map of Days
    A London Map of Days This is the key to the daily details that feature on my etching A London Map of Days. I posted these every day on both Facebook and Twitter from the 9 February 2015 through to 8 February 2016. As the project continued, I began to enjoy myself and treat it more like a blog and so there is a marked difference between the amount of detail I have included at the beginning and the end of that year. 1 January 1660 Samuel Pepys begins writing his famous diary. He started the diary when he was only 26 years old and kept it for 10 years. He was a naval administrator and even though he had no maritime experience, he rose by a combination of hard work, patronage and talent for administration to be the Chief Secretary to the Admiralty under King Charles II and King James II. His diary, which was not published until the 19th century was written in a cryptic, personal shorthand and the first person to fully transcribe it, did so without the benefit of the key. It was not until 1970 that an unabridged version was published as previous editions had omitted passages deemed too obscene to print, usually involving Pepys sexual exploits. The diary combines personal anecdotes (often centred around drinking) with eyewitness accounts of great events such as the Great Plague of London, the Second Dutch War and the Great Fire of London. It is a glorious work and was a constant source of inspiration for my map. Daily detail from A London Map of Days.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Republicanism in England, America, and the Imperial Atlantic, 1624-1661
    RADICAL REPUBLICANISM IN ENGLAND, AMERICA, AND THE IMPERIAL ATLANTIC, 1624-1661 by John Donoghue B.A., Westminster College, New Wilmington, PA, 1993 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1999 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2006 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Faculty of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by John Donoghue It was defended on December 2, 2005 and approved by William Fusfield, Associate Professor, Department of Communication Janelle Greenberg, Professor, Department of History Jonathan Scott, Professor, Department of History Dissertation Director: Marcus Rediker, Professor, Department of History ii Copyright by John Donoghue 2006 iii RADICAL REPUBLICANISM IN ENGLAND, AMERICA, AND THE IMPERIAL ATLANTIC, 1624-1661 John Donoghue, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, April 30, 2006 This dissertation links the radical politics of the English Revolution to the history of puritan New England. It argues that antinomians, by rejecting traditional concepts of social authority, created divisive political factions within the godly party while it waged war against King Charles I. At the same time in New England, antinomians organized a political movement that called for a democratic commonwealth to limit the power of ministers and magistrates in religious and civil affairs. When this program collapsed in Massachusetts, hundreds of colonists returned to an Old England engulfed by civil war. Joining English antinomians, they became lay preachers in London, New Model Army soldiers, and influential supporters of the republican Levellers. This dissertation also connects the study of republican political thought to the labor history of the first British Empire.
    [Show full text]