Axinella Carteri A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Taxonomy and Diversity of the Sponge Fauna from Walters Shoal, a Shallow Seamount in the Western Indian Ocean Region
Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region By Robyn Pauline Payne A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Supervisors: Dr Toufiek Samaai Prof. Mark J. Gibbons Dr Wayne K. Florence The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. December 2015 Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region Robyn Pauline Payne Keywords Indian Ocean Seamount Walters Shoal Sponges Taxonomy Systematics Diversity Biogeography ii Abstract Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region R. P. Payne MSc Thesis, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Seamounts are poorly understood ubiquitous undersea features, with less than 4% sampled for scientific purposes globally. Consequently, the fauna associated with seamounts in the Indian Ocean remains largely unknown, with less than 300 species recorded. One such feature within this region is Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount located on the South Madagascar Ridge, which is situated approximately 400 nautical miles south of Madagascar and 600 nautical miles east of South Africa. Even though it penetrates the euphotic zone (summit is 15 m below the sea surface) and is protected by the Southern Indian Ocean Deep- Sea Fishers Association, there is a paucity of biodiversity and oceanographic data. -
A Soft Spot for Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution
marine drugs Review A Soft Spot for Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution Adrian Galitz 1 , Yoichi Nakao 2 , Peter J. Schupp 3,4 , Gert Wörheide 1,5,6 and Dirk Erpenbeck 1,5,* 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (G.W.) 2 Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan; [email protected] 3 Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Wilhelmshaven, Germany; [email protected] 4 Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity, University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), 26129 Oldenburg, Germany 5 GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany 6 SNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Palaeontology and Geology, 80333 Munich, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Marine sponges are the most prolific marine sources for discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Sponge secondary metabolites are sought-after for their potential in pharmaceutical applications, and in the past, they were also used as taxonomic markers alongside the difficult and homoplasy-prone sponge morphology for species delineation (chemotaxonomy). The understanding Citation: Galitz, A.; Nakao, Y.; of phylogenetic distribution and distinctiveness of metabolites to sponge lineages is pivotal to reveal Schupp, P.J.; Wörheide, G.; pathways and evolution of compound production in sponges. This benefits the discovery rate and Erpenbeck, D. A Soft Spot for yield of bioprospecting for novel marine natural products by identifying lineages with high potential Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge of being new sources of valuable sponge compounds. -
Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3*
Morrow and Cárdenas Frontiers in Zoology (2015) 12:7 DOI 10.1186/s12983-015-0099-8 DEBATE Open Access Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3* Abstract Background: Demospongiae is the largest sponge class including 81% of all living sponges with nearly 7,000 species worldwide. Systema Porifera (2002) was the result of a large international collaboration to update the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on morphological data. Since then, an increasing number of molecular phylogenetic studies have considerably shaken this taxonomic framework, with numerous polyphyletic groups revealed or confirmed and new clades discovered. And yet, despite a few taxonomical changes, the overall framework of the Systema Porifera classification still stands and is used as it is by the scientific community. This has led to a widening phylogeny/classification gap which creates biases and inconsistencies for the many end-users of this classification and ultimately impedes our understanding of today’s marine ecosystems and evolutionary processes. In an attempt to bridge this phylogeny/classification gap, we propose to officially revise the higher taxa Demospongiae classification. Discussion: We propose a revision of the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on molecular data of the last ten years. We recommend the use of three subclasses: Verongimorpha, Keratosa and Heteroscleromorpha. We retain seven (Agelasida, Chondrosiida, Dendroceratida, Dictyoceratida, Haplosclerida, Poecilosclerida, Verongiida) of the 13 orders from Systema Porifera. We recommend the abandonment of five order names (Hadromerida, Halichondrida, Halisarcida, lithistids, Verticillitida) and resurrect or upgrade six order names (Axinellida, Merliida, Spongillida, Sphaerocladina, Suberitida, Tetractinellida). Finally, we create seven new orders (Bubarida, Desmacellida, Polymastiida, Scopalinida, Clionaida, Tethyida, Trachycladida). -
Supplementary Materials: Patterns of Sponge Biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia
Diversity 2016, 8, 21; doi:10.3390/d8040021 S1 of S3 9 Supplementary Materials: Patterns of Sponge Biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia Jane Fromont, Muhammad Azmi Abdul Wahab, Oliver Gomez, Merrick Ekins, Monique Grol and John Norman Ashby Hooper 1. Materials and Methods 1.1. Collation of Sponge Occurrence Data Data of sponge occurrences were collated from databases of the Western Australian Museum (WAM) and Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) [1]. Pilbara sponge data on ALA had been captured in a northern Australian sponge report [2], but with the WAM data, provides a far more comprehensive dataset, in both geographic and taxonomic composition of sponges. Quality control procedures were undertaken to remove obvious duplicate records and those with insufficient or ambiguous species data. Due to differing naming conventions of OTUs by institutions contributing to the two databases and the lack of resources for physical comparison of all OTU specimens, a maximum error of ± 13.5% total species counts was determined for the dataset, to account for potentially unique (differently named OTUs are unique) or overlapping OTUs (differently named OTUs are the same) (157 potential instances identified out of 1164 total OTUs). The amalgamation of these two databases produced a complete occurrence dataset (presence/absence) of all currently described sponge species and OTUs from the region (see Table S1). The dataset follows the new taxonomic classification proposed by [3] and implemented by [4]. The latter source was used to confirm present validities and taxon authorities for known species names. The dataset consists of records identified as (1) described (Linnean) species, (2) records with “cf.” in front of species names which indicates the specimens have some characters of a described species but also differences, which require comparisons with type material, and (3) records as “operational taxonomy units” (OTUs) which are considered to be unique species although further assessments are required to establish their taxonomic status. -
General Introduction and Objectives 3
General introduction and objectives 3 General introduction: General body organization: The phylum Porifera is commonly referred to as sponges. The phylum, that comprises more than 6,000 species, is divided into three classes: Calcarea, Hexactinellida and Demospongiae. The latter class contains more than 85% of the living species. They are predominantly marine, with the notable exception of the family Spongillidae, an extant group of freshwater demosponges whose fossil record begins in the Cretaceous. Sponges are ubiquitous benthic creatures, found at all latitudes beneath the world's oceans, and from the intertidal to the deep-sea. Sponges are considered as the most basal phylum of metazoans, since most of their features appear to be primitive, and it is widely accepted that multicellular animals consist of a monophyletic group (Zrzavy et al. 1998). Poriferans appear to be diploblastic (Leys 2004; Maldonado 2004), although the two cellular sheets are difficult to homologise with those of the rest of metazoans. They are sessile animals, though it has been shown that some are able to move slowly (up to 4 mm per day) within aquaria (e.g., Bond and Harris 1988; Maldonado and Uriz 1999). They lack organs, possessing cells that develop great number of functions. The sponge body is lined by a pseudoepithelial layer of flat cells (exopinacocytes). Anatomically and physiologically, tissues of most sponges (but carnivorous sponges) are organized around an aquiferous system of excurrent and incurrent canals (Rupert and Barnes 1995). These canals are lined by a pseudoepithelial layer of flat cells (endopinacocytes).Water flows into the sponge body through multiple apertures (ostia) General introduction and objectives 4 to the incurrent canals which end in the choanocyte chambers (Fig. -
Chapter 13. State of Deep-Sea Coral and Sponge Ecosystems of the U.S
State of Deep‐Sea Coral and Sponge Ecosystems of the Southeast United States Chapter 13 in The State of Deep‐Sea Coral and Sponge Ecosystems of the United States Report Recommended citation: Hourigan TF, Reed J, Pomponi S, Ross SW, David AW, Harter S (2017) State of Deep‐Sea Coral and Sponge Ecosystems of the Southeast United States. In: Hourigan TF, Etnoyer, PJ, Cairns, SD (eds.). The State of Deep‐Sea Coral and Sponge Ecosystems of the United States. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS‐OHC‐4, Silver Spring, MD. 60 p. Available online: http://deepseacoraldata.noaa.gov/library. STATE OF THE DEEP‐SEA CORAL AND SPONGE ECOSYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHEAST UNITED STATES Squat lobster perched on Lophelia pertusa colonies with a sponge in the background. Courtesy of NOAA/ USGS. 408 STATE OF THE DEEP‐SEA CORAL AND SPONGE ECOSYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHEAST UNITED STATES STATE OF THE DEEP- SEA CORAL AND Thomas F. Hourigan1*, SPONGE ECOSYSTEMS John Reed2, OF THE SOUTHEAST Shirley Pomponi2, UNITED STATES Steve W. Ross3, Andrew W. David4, and I. Introduction Stacey Harter4 The Southeast U.S. region stretches from the Straits of Florida north to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, and encompasses the 1 NOAA Deep Sea Coral Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf large marine ecosystem (LME; Research and Technology Carolinian ecoregion) and associated deeper waters of the Blake Program, Office of Habitat Plateau, as well as a small portion of the Caribbean LME off the Conservation, Silver Florida Keys (eastern portion of the Floridian ecoregion). Within Spring, MD * Corresponding Author: U.S. waters, deep‐sea stony coral reefs reach their greatest [email protected] abundance and development in this region (Ross and Nizinski 2007). -
Porifera: Demospongiae: Axinellida: Raspailiidae) from Deep Seamounts of the Western Pacific
Zootaxa 4410 (2): 379–386 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4410.2.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:14C3B3C0-2DF9-4893-998F-23D96450C1FD A new species of the sponge Raspailia (Raspaxilla) (Porifera: Demospongiae: Axinellida: Raspailiidae) from deep seamounts of the Western Pacific MERRICK EKINS1,2,6, CÉCILE DEBITUS3, DIRK ERPENBECK4 & JOHN N.A. HOOPER1,5 1Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072 Australia 3LEMAR, IRD, CNRS, IFREMER, UBO, IUEM, rue Dumont d’Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France 4Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences and GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany 5Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Queensland, Australia 6Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species of Raspailia (Raspaxilla) frondosa sp. nov. is described from the deep seamounts of the Norfolk and New Caledonia Ridges. The morphology of the species resembles that of a frond or a fern, and its unique highly compressed axial skeleton of interlaced spongin fibres without spicules in combination with a radial extra axial skeleton of a perpen- dicular palisade of spicules, differentiate it from all other species of the subgenus. This species is compared -
Sponges on Coral Reefs: a Community Shaped by Competitive Cooperation
Boll. Mus. Ist. Biol. Univ. Genova, 68: 85-148, 2003 (2004) 85 SPONGES ON CORAL REEFS: A COMMUNITY SHAPED BY COMPETITIVE COOPERATION KLAUS RÜTZLER Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0163, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Conservationists and resource managers throughout the world continue to overlook the important role of sponges in reef ecology. This neglect persists for three primary reasons: sponges remain an enigmatic group, because they are difficult to identify and to maintain under laboratory conditions; the few scientists working with the group are highly specialized and have not yet produced authoritative, well-illustrated field manuals for large geographic areas; even studies at particular sites have yet to reach comprehensive levels. Sponges are complex benthic sessile invertebrates that are intimately associated with other animals and numerous plants and microbes. They are specialized filter feeders, require solid substrate to flourish, and have varying growth forms (encrusting to branching erect), which allow single specimens to make multiple contacts with their substrate. Coral reefs and associated communities offer an abundance of suitable substrates, ranging from coral rock to mangrove stilt roots. Owing to their high diversity, large biomass, complex physiology and chemistry, and long evolutionary history, sponges (and their endo-symbionts) play a key role in a host of ecological processes: space competition, habitat provision, predation, chemical defense, primary production, nutrient cycling, nitrification, food chains, bioerosion, mineralization, and cementation. Although certain sponges appear to benefit from the rapid deterioration of coral reefs currently under way in numerous locations as a result of habitat destruction, pollution, water warming, and overexploitation, sponge communities too will die off as soon as their substrates disappear under the forces of bioerosion and water dynamics. -
Novel Natural Product Discovery from Marine Sponges and Their Obligate Symbiotic Organisms
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/005454; this version posted May 24, 2014. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Mini-review Novel Natural Product Discovery from Marine Sponges and their Obligate Symbiotic Organisms Regina R. Monaco1 * , and Rena F. Quinlan2 1 Hunter College, Department of Computer Sciences, 695 Park Ave, NY, NY 10028, 2 Lehman College, CUNY, 250 Bedford Park Blvd. West, Department of Biological Sciences, Bronx, NY 10468, USA *Address correspondence to: [email protected], Tel.: +1-484-466-6226 Abstract: Discovery of novel natural products is an accepted method for the elucidation of pharmacologically active molecules and drug leads. Best known sources for such discovery have been terrestrial plants and microbes, accounting for about 85% of the approved natural products in pharmaceutical use (1), and about 60% of approved pharmaceuticals and new drug applications annually (2). Discovery in the marine environment has lagged due to the difficulty of exploration in this ecological niche. Exploration began in earnest in the 1950’s, after technological advances such as scuba diving allowed collection of marine organisms, primarily at a depth to about 15m. Natural products from filter feeding marine invertebrates and in particular, sponges, have proven to be a rich source of structurally unique pharmacologically active compounds, with over 16,000 molecules isolated thus far (3, 1) and a continuing pace of discovery at hundreds of novel bioactive molecules per year. -
Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pipestela, a new genus of Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae: Halichondrida) and description of three new species Alvarez, B.; Hooper, J.N.A.; van Soest, R.W.M. Publication date 2008 Published in Memoirs of the Queensland Museum Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Alvarez, B., Hooper, J. N. A., & van Soest, R. W. M. (2008). Pipestela, a new genus of Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae: Halichondrida) and description of three new species. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 52(2), 105-118. http://www.southbank.qm.qld.gov.au/~/media/Documents/Research/Memoirs%20- %20Nature/N52-2/52_2_Alvarez-et-al.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 VOLUME 52 PART 2 ME M OIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEU M BRIS B ANE 30 APRIL 2008 © Queensland Museum PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. -
Guidelines for Inventorying and Monitoring of Dark Habitats
UNITED NATIONS UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG. 431/Inf.12 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 31 March 2017 English Original: English Thirteenth Meeting of Focal Points for Specially Protected Areas Alexandria, Egypt, 9-12 May 2017 Agenda Item 4 : Progress report on activities carried out by SPA/RAC since the twelfth meeting of Focal Points for SPAs Draft Guidelines for Inventoring and Monitoring of Dark Habitats For environmental and economy reasons, this document is printed in a limited number and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UN Environment/MAP SPA/RAC - Tunis, 2017 Note: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) and UN Environment concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2017 United Nations Environment Programme / Mediterranean Action Plan (UN Environment /MAP) Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat B.P. 337 - 1080 Tunis Cedex - Tunisia E-mail: [email protected] The original version of this document was prepared for the Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) by Ricardo Aguilar & Pilar Marín, OCEANA and Vasilis Gerovasileiou, SPA/RAC Consultant with contribution from Tatjana Bakran- Petricioli, Enric Ballesteros, Hocein Bazairi, Carlo Nike Bianchi, Simona Bussotti, Simonepietro Canese, Pierre Chevaldonné, Douglas Evans, Maïa Fourt, Jordi Grinyó, Jean- Georges Harmelin, Alain Jeudy de Grissac, Vesna Mačić, Covadonga Orejas, Maria del Mar Otero, Gérard Pergent, Donat Petricioli, Alfonso A. -
Collation and Validation of Museum Collection Databases Related to the Distribution of Marine Sponges in Northern Australia
1 COLLATION AND VALIDATION OF MUSEUM COLLECTION DATABASES RELATED TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF MARINE SPONGES IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA. JOHN N.A. HOOPER & MERRICK EKINS 2 3 Collation and validation of museum collection databases related to the distribution of marine sponges in Northern Australia (Contract National Oceans Office C2004/020) John N.A. Hooper & Merrick Ekins Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia ([email protected], [email protected]) CONTENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 1.1. General Introduction ..................................................................................... 10 1.2. Definitions of Australia’s marine bioregions ............................................... 12 2. MATERIALS & METHODS ....................................................................................... 16 2.1. Specimen point-data conversion ................................................................... 16 2.2. Geographic coverage and scales of analysis................................................. 18 2.3. Species distributions....................................................................................... 19 2.4. Modelled distribution datasets and historical sponge data ........................ 20 2.5. Identification of useful datasets and gaps in data, prioritised