DOCSLIB.ORG

Collation and Validation of Museum Collection Databases Related to the Distribution of Marine Sponges in Northern Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collation and Validation of Museum Collection Databases Related to the Distribution of Marine Sponges in Northern Australia 1 COLLATION AND VALIDATION OF MUSEUM COLLECTION DATABASES RELATED TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF MARINE SPONGES IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA. JOHN N.A. HOOPER & MERRICK EKINS 2 3 Collation and validation of museum collection databases related to the distribution of marine sponges in Northern Australia (Contract National Oceans Office C2004/020) John N.A. Hooper & Merrick Ekins Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia ([email protected], [email protected]) CONTENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 1.1. General Introduction ..................................................................................... 10 1.2. Definitions of Australia’s marine bioregions ............................................... 12 2. MATERIALS & METHODS ....................................................................................... 16 2.1. Specimen point-data conversion ................................................................... 16 2.2. Geographic coverage and scales of analysis................................................. 18 2.3. Species distributions....................................................................................... 19 2.4. Modelled distribution datasets and historical sponge data ........................ 20 2.5. Identification of useful datasets and gaps in data, prioritised by geographic location and acceptable data standards................................................... 20 2.6. Species database.............................................................................................. 21 2.7. Numerical analysis of sponge data................................................................ 22 2.8. Dissemination of data via the web................................................................. 25 2.9. Abbreviations.................................................................................................. 25 2.10. Background to GIS analysis of the sponge dataset.................................... 25 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.................................................................................... 31 3.1. Definitions of Australia’s marine bioregions ............................................... 31 3.2. Descriptive GIS analysis of bioregionalisation trends for sponge groups 38 3.3. Numerical analysis of Australian tropical sponge biodiversity and bioregionalisation ...................................................................................... 38 3.3.1. Localities (γ-scale diversity) ....................................................................... 38 3.3.2. Bioregions (ε-scale diversity) ..................................................................... 64 3.4. Consensus of datasets delineating bioregional transition zones................. 79 4. CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 80 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... 85 6. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 85 APPENDIX 1. List of sponge species chosen as surrogates for collaborative studies between Australian sponge collection and research institutions (QM, AIMS, MAGNT, WAM). Refer to Appendix 6 for PDF file of CAAB modelled species distributions for each of these surrogate species.................................................................................................. 89 APPENDIX 2. A. Small scale (γ-scale diversity) regions sampled for sponges in northern Australia (including temperate transitional bioregions). B. Similarities between larger scale (ε-scale diversity) regions................................................................................................ 102 APPENDIX 3. List of species occurring in four or more tropical Australian bioregions ........................................................................................................................................... 104 4 APPENDIX 4. Jaccard Similarity index (%) for pairwise comparisons between small scale (γ-scale diversity) localities sampled for sponges in northern Australia (including temperate transitional bioregions) ................................................................................................... 109 APPENDIX 5. Metadata for the sponge dataset to accompany NOO, GA and OZCAM databases ......................................................................................................................... 110 APPENDIX 6. Descriptive analysis of GIS bioregionalisation trends for sponge groups ........................................................................................................................................... 113 1. Family Plakinidae Schulze, 1880 ...................................................................... 113 2. Family Tetillidae Sollas, 1886 .......................................................................... 114 3. Family Ancorinidae Schmidt, 1870 .................................................................. 116 4. Family Geodiidae Gray, 1867 .......................................................................... 118 5. Family Clionaidae d’Orbigny, 1851.................................................................. 119 6. Family Alectonidae Rosell, 1996 & Family Hemiasterellidae Lendenfeld, 1889 ............................................................................................................................... 120 7. Family Polymastiidae Gray, 1867 .................................................................... 121 8. Family Spirastrellidae Ridley & Dendy, 1886 ................................................. 122 9. Family Trachycladidae Hallmann, 1917 & Family Timeidae Topsent, 1928... 123 10. Family Suberitidae Schmidt, 1870 .................................................................. 124 11. Family Tethyidae Gray, 1848 ......................................................................... 126 12. Family Chondrillidae Gray, 1872 ................................................................... 127 13. ‘Coralline sponges’: Family Acanthochaetetidae Fischer, 1970, Family Verticillitidae Steinmann, 1882, Family Astroscleridae Lister, 1900 .............................. 129 14. Family Agelasidae Verrill, 1907 .................................................................... 130 15. Family Acarnidae Dendy, 1922 ...................................................................... 131 16. Family Microcionidae Carter, 1875 ................................................................ 132 17. Family Raspailiidae Hentschel, 1923 ............................................................. 144 18. Family Rhabderemiidae Topsent, 1928, Family Esperiopsidae Hentschel, 1923 & Family Isodictyidae Dendy, 1924 ............................................................. 151 19. Family Desmacellidae Ridley & Dendy, 1886 ............................................... 153 20. Family Podospongiidae de Laubenfels, 1936.................................................. 154 21. Family Mycalidae Lundbeck, 1905 ................................................................ 155 22. Family Chondropsidae Carter, 1886................................................................ 157 23. Family Coelosphaeridae Dendy, 1922 .......................................................... 161 24. Family Tedaniidae Ridley & Dendy, 1886...................................................... 163 25. Family Crellidae Dendy, 1922 & Family Phellodermidae Van Soest & Hajdu, 2002 ........................................................................................................... 164 26. Family Desmacididae Schmidt, 1870.............................................................. 165 27. Family Hymedesmiidae Topsent, 1928 .......................................................... 166 28. Family Iotrochotidae Dendy, 1922.................................................................. 167 29. Family Myxillidae Dendy, 1922 ..................................................................... 169 30. Family Latrunculiidae Topsent, 1922.............................................................. 169 31. Family Axinellidae Carter, 1875 .................................................................... 170 32. Family Desmoxyidae Hallmann, 1917 ............................................................ 177 33. Family Dictyonellidae Van Soest, Diaz & Pomponi, 1990 ............................ 177 34. Family Halichondriidae Gray, 1867 ............................................................... 180 35. Family Callyspongiidae de Laubenfels, 1936 ................................................ 186 36. Family Chalinidae Gray, 1867 ....................................................................... 191 37. Family Niphatidae Van Soest, 1980 ............................................................... 195 38. Family Petrosiidae Van Soest, 1980 ............................................................... 200 39. Family Phloeodictyidae Carter, 1882 ............................................................. 203 5 40. Family Dysideidae Gray, 1867 ....................................................................... 206 41. Family Irciniidae Gray,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of the Sponge Fauna from Walters Shoal, a Shallow Seamount in the Western Indian Ocean Region
    Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region By Robyn Pauline Payne A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Supervisors: Dr Toufiek Samaai Prof. Mark J. Gibbons Dr Wayne K. Florence The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. December 2015 Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region Robyn Pauline Payne Keywords Indian Ocean Seamount Walters Shoal Sponges Taxonomy Systematics Diversity Biogeography ii Abstract Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region R. P. Payne MSc Thesis, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Seamounts are poorly understood ubiquitous undersea features, with less than 4% sampled for scientific purposes globally. Consequently, the fauna associated with seamounts in the Indian Ocean remains largely unknown, with less than 300 species recorded. One such feature within this region is Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount located on the South Madagascar Ridge, which is situated approximately 400 nautical miles south of Madagascar and 600 nautical miles east of South Africa. Even though it penetrates the euphotic zone (summit is 15 m below the sea surface) and is protected by the Southern Indian Ocean Deep- Sea Fishers Association, there is a paucity of biodiversity and oceanographic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Some Important Early Collections of West Indian Type Specimens, with Historical Notes
    Appendix: Some important early collections of West Indian type specimens, with historical notes Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 between 1841 and 1864, we gain additional information concerning the sponge memoir, starting with the letter dated 8 May 1855. Jacob Gysbert Samuel van Breda A biography of Placide Duchassaing de Fonbressin was (1788-1867) was professor of botany in Franeker (Hol­ published by his friend Sagot (1873). Although an aristo­ land), of botany and zoology in Gent (Belgium), and crat by birth, as we learn from Michelotti's last extant then of zoology and geology in Leyden. Later he went to letter to van Breda, Duchassaing did not add de Fon­ Haarlem, where he was secretary of the Hollandsche bressin to his name until 1864. Duchassaing was born Maatschappij der Wetenschappen, curator of its cabinet around 1819 on Guadeloupe, in a French-Creole family of natural history, and director of Teyler's Museum of of planters. He was sent to school in Paris, first to the minerals, fossils and physical instruments. Van Breda Lycee Louis-le-Grand, then to University. He finished traveled extensively in Europe collecting fossils, especial­ his studies in 1844 with a doctorate in medicine and two ly in Italy. Michelotti exchanged collections of fossils additional theses in geology and zoology. He then settled with him over a long period of time, and was received as on Guadeloupe as physician. Because of social unrest foreign member of the Hollandsche Maatschappij der after the freeing of native labor, he left Guadeloupe W etenschappen in 1842. The two chief papers of Miche­ around 1848, and visited several islands of the Antilles lotti on fossils were published by the Hollandsche Maat­ (notably Nevis, Sint Eustatius, St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Soft Spot for Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution
    marine drugs Review A Soft Spot for Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution Adrian Galitz 1 , Yoichi Nakao 2 , Peter J. Schupp 3,4 , Gert Wörheide 1,5,6 and Dirk Erpenbeck 1,5,* 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (G.W.) 2 Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan; [email protected] 3 Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Wilhelmshaven, Germany; [email protected] 4 Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity, University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), 26129 Oldenburg, Germany 5 GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany 6 SNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Palaeontology and Geology, 80333 Munich, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Marine sponges are the most prolific marine sources for discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Sponge secondary metabolites are sought-after for their potential in pharmaceutical applications, and in the past, they were also used as taxonomic markers alongside the difficult and homoplasy-prone sponge morphology for species delineation (chemotaxonomy). The understanding Citation: Galitz, A.; Nakao, Y.; of phylogenetic distribution and distinctiveness of metabolites to sponge lineages is pivotal to reveal Schupp, P.J.; Wörheide, G.; pathways and evolution of compound production in sponges. This benefits the discovery rate and Erpenbeck, D. A Soft Spot for yield of bioprospecting for novel marine natural products by identifying lineages with high potential Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge of being new sources of valuable sponge compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Equivalence and Evolutionary Convergence In
    Functional equivalence and evolutionary convergence PNAS PLUS in complex communities of microbial sponge symbionts Lu Fana,b, David Reynoldsa,b, Michael Liua,b, Manuel Starkc,d, Staffan Kjelleberga,b,e, Nicole S. Websterf, and Torsten Thomasa,b,1 aSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences and bCentre for Marine Bio-Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia; cInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and dSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; eSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Republic of Singapore; and fAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia Edited by W. Ford Doolittle, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, and approved May 21, 2012 (received for review February 24, 2012) Microorganisms often form symbiotic relationships with eukar- ties (11, 12). Symbionts also can be transmitted vertically through yotes, and the complexity of these relationships can range from reproductive cells and larvae, as has been demonstrated in those with one single dominant symbiont to associations with sponges (13, 14), insects (15), ascidians (16), bivalves (17), and hundreds of symbiont species. Microbial symbionts occupying various other animals (18). Vertical transmission generally leads equivalent niches in different eukaryotic hosts may share func- to microbial communities with limited variation in taxonomy and tional aspects, and convergent genome evolution has been function among host individuals. reported for simple symbiont systems in insects. However, for Niches with similar selections may exist in phylogenetically complex symbiont communities, it is largely unknown how prev- divergent hosts that lead comparable lifestyles or have similar alent functional equivalence is and whether equivalent functions physiological properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3*
    Morrow and Cárdenas Frontiers in Zoology (2015) 12:7 DOI 10.1186/s12983-015-0099-8 DEBATE Open Access Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3* Abstract Background: Demospongiae is the largest sponge class including 81% of all living sponges with nearly 7,000 species worldwide. Systema Porifera (2002) was the result of a large international collaboration to update the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on morphological data. Since then, an increasing number of molecular phylogenetic studies have considerably shaken this taxonomic framework, with numerous polyphyletic groups revealed or confirmed and new clades discovered. And yet, despite a few taxonomical changes, the overall framework of the Systema Porifera classification still stands and is used as it is by the scientific community. This has led to a widening phylogeny/classification gap which creates biases and inconsistencies for the many end-users of this classification and ultimately impedes our understanding of today’s marine ecosystems and evolutionary processes. In an attempt to bridge this phylogeny/classification gap, we propose to officially revise the higher taxa Demospongiae classification. Discussion: We propose a revision of the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on molecular data of the last ten years. We recommend the use of three subclasses: Verongimorpha, Keratosa and Heteroscleromorpha. We retain seven (Agelasida, Chondrosiida, Dendroceratida, Dictyoceratida, Haplosclerida, Poecilosclerida, Verongiida) of the 13 orders from Systema Porifera. We recommend the abandonment of five order names (Hadromerida, Halichondrida, Halisarcida, lithistids, Verticillitida) and resurrect or upgrade six order names (Axinellida, Merliida, Spongillida, Sphaerocladina, Suberitida, Tetractinellida). Finally, we create seven new orders (Bubarida, Desmacellida, Polymastiida, Scopalinida, Clionaida, Tethyida, Trachycladida).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials: Patterns of Sponge Biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia
    Diversity 2016, 8, 21; doi:10.3390/d8040021 S1 of S3 9 Supplementary Materials: Patterns of Sponge Biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia Jane Fromont, Muhammad Azmi Abdul Wahab, Oliver Gomez, Merrick Ekins, Monique Grol and John Norman Ashby Hooper 1. Materials and Methods 1.1. Collation of Sponge Occurrence Data Data of sponge occurrences were collated from databases of the Western Australian Museum (WAM) and Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) [1]. Pilbara sponge data on ALA had been captured in a northern Australian sponge report [2], but with the WAM data, provides a far more comprehensive dataset, in both geographic and taxonomic composition of sponges. Quality control procedures were undertaken to remove obvious duplicate records and those with insufficient or ambiguous species data. Due to differing naming conventions of OTUs by institutions contributing to the two databases and the lack of resources for physical comparison of all OTU specimens, a maximum error of ± 13.5% total species counts was determined for the dataset, to account for potentially unique (differently named OTUs are unique) or overlapping OTUs (differently named OTUs are the same) (157 potential instances identified out of 1164 total OTUs). The amalgamation of these two databases produced a complete occurrence dataset (presence/absence) of all currently described sponge species and OTUs from the region (see Table S1). The dataset follows the new taxonomic classification proposed by [3] and implemented by [4]. The latter source was used to confirm present validities and taxon authorities for known species names. The dataset consists of records identified as (1) described (Linnean) species, (2) records with “cf.” in front of species names which indicates the specimens have some characters of a described species but also differences, which require comparisons with type material, and (3) records as “operational taxonomy units” (OTUs) which are considered to be unique species although further assessments are required to establish their taxonomic status.
    [Show full text]
  • Porifera) in Singapore and Description of a New Species of Forcepia (Poecilosclerida: Coelosphaeridae)
    Contributions to Zoology, 81 (1) 55-71 (2012) Biodiversity of shallow-water sponges (Porifera) in Singapore and description of a new species of Forcepia (Poecilosclerida: Coelosphaeridae) Swee-Cheng Lim1, 3, Nicole J. de Voogd2, Koh-Siang Tan1 1 Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore 2 Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity, Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 3 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: intertidal, Southeast Asia, sponge assemblage, subtidal, tropical Abstract gia) patera (Hardwicke, 1822) was the first sponge de- scribed from Singapore in the 19th century. This was A surprisingly high number of shallow water sponge species followed by Leucosolenia flexilis (Haeckel, 1872), (197) were recorded from extensive sampling of natural inter- Coelocarteria singaporensis (Carter, 1883) (as Phloeo­ tidal and subtidal habitats in Singapore (Southeast Asia) from May 2003 to June 2010. This is in spite of a highly modified dictyon), and Callyspongia (Cladochalina) diffusa coastline that encompasses one of the world’s largest container Ridley (1884). Subsequently, Dragnewitsch (1906) re- ports as well as extensive oil refining and bunkering industries. corded 24 sponge species from Tanjong Pagar and Pu- A total of 99 intertidal species was recorded in this study. Of lau Brani in the Singapore Strait. A further six species these, 53 species were recorded exclusively from the intertidal of sponge were reported from Singapore in the 1900s, zone and only 45 species were found on both intertidal and subtidal habitats, suggesting that tropical intertidal and subtidal although two species, namely Cinachyrella globulosa sponge assemblages are different and distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • General Introduction and Objectives 3
    General introduction and objectives 3 General introduction: General body organization: The phylum Porifera is commonly referred to as sponges. The phylum, that comprises more than 6,000 species, is divided into three classes: Calcarea, Hexactinellida and Demospongiae. The latter class contains more than 85% of the living species. They are predominantly marine, with the notable exception of the family Spongillidae, an extant group of freshwater demosponges whose fossil record begins in the Cretaceous. Sponges are ubiquitous benthic creatures, found at all latitudes beneath the world's oceans, and from the intertidal to the deep-sea. Sponges are considered as the most basal phylum of metazoans, since most of their features appear to be primitive, and it is widely accepted that multicellular animals consist of a monophyletic group (Zrzavy et al. 1998). Poriferans appear to be diploblastic (Leys 2004; Maldonado 2004), although the two cellular sheets are difficult to homologise with those of the rest of metazoans. They are sessile animals, though it has been shown that some are able to move slowly (up to 4 mm per day) within aquaria (e.g., Bond and Harris 1988; Maldonado and Uriz 1999). They lack organs, possessing cells that develop great number of functions. The sponge body is lined by a pseudoepithelial layer of flat cells (exopinacocytes). Anatomically and physiologically, tissues of most sponges (but carnivorous sponges) are organized around an aquiferous system of excurrent and incurrent canals (Rupert and Barnes 1995). These canals are lined by a pseudoepithelial layer of flat cells (endopinacocytes).Water flows into the sponge body through multiple apertures (ostia) General introduction and objectives 4 to the incurrent canals which end in the choanocyte chambers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of the Genus Callyspongia (Haplosclerida:Callyspongiidae) from Korea
    Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity xxx (2017) 1e5 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/japb Original Article Two new species of the genus Callyspongia (Haplosclerida:Callyspongiidae) from Korea Kim Hyung June, Kang Dong Won* National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon 33662, South Korea article info abstract Article history: In this study, two new species of the genus Callyspongia Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864: Callyspognia Received 11 July 2017 pyeongdaensis sp. nov. and Callyspongia maraensis sp. nov. from Korea are described as new to science. All Received in revised form of the available information is presented in this study including the localities from which the species 5 September 2017 were collected and illustrations of spicule and skeleton. Accepted 22 September 2017 Ó 2017 National Science Museum of Korea (NSMK) and Korea National Arboretum (KNA), Publishing Available online xxx Services by Elsevier. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Callyspongiidae Callyspongia Korea New species Sponge Introduction surveyed Jeju Island, South Korea, where marine life has not been studied and is affected by Kuroshio Current. As a result, here, we The family Callyspongiidae was found in 1936 by de Laubenfels describe one new species of Callyspongia. This new species was and consists of haplosclerid sponges which have a two- compared with the Korea and Japan Callyspongia species with a dimensional ectosomal skeleton of primary, secondary, and some- similar morphology. times tertiary fibers (De Voogd 2004; Desqueyroux-Faundeze and Valentine 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Porifera, Demospongiae, Part 3 (Haplosclerida and Nepheliospongida)
    ISSN 0083-7903, 87 (Print) ISSN 2538-1016; 87 (Online) The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Porifera, Demospongiae, Part 3 (Haplosclerida and Nepheliospongida) by P. R. BERGQUIST and K. P. WARNE . �· New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir 87 1980 NEW ZEALAND DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Porifera, I;)emospongiae, Part 3 (Haplosclerida and Nepheliospongida) by P. R. BERGQUIST and K. P. WARNE Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir 87 1980 This workSig is licensed 1 under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ ISSN 0083-7903 Received for publication: May 1979 © Crown Copyright I 980 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES 4 LIST OF TABLES 4 ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 Acknowledgments 8 COLLECTIONS EXAMINED 8 LIST OF SPECIES DESCRIBED 11 SYSTEMATICS ... 12 Order Haplosclerida Topsent 12 Family Haliclonidae de Laubenfels 12 Haliclona Grant, 1835 12 Family Adociidae de Laubenfels 19 Adocia Gray, 1867 20 Orina Gray, 1867 21 Sigmadocia de Laubenfels, 1936 22 Toxadocia de Laubenfels, 1936 ... 24 Family Callyspongiidae de Laubenfels 24 Callyspongia Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 ... 24 Chalinopsil/a Lendenfeld, 1888 ... 33 Dactylia Carter, 1885 34 Order Nepheliospongida Bergquist 34 Family Nepheliospongiidae Clark ... 35 Petrosia Vosmaer, 1887 ... 35 Xestospongia de Laubenfels, 1932 36 Family Oceanapiidae Van Soest 37 Oceanapia Norman, 1869 37 Vagocia de Laubenfels, 1936 38 REFERENCES 39 INDEX 41 PLATES ..
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Sponges (Porifera) in Port Phillip. Museum Victoria, Melbourne
    Goudie, L. (2012) List of sponges (Porifera) in Port Phillip. Museum Victoria, Melbourne. This list is based on Museum Victoria collection records and knowledge of local experts. It includes all species in Port Phillip and nearby waters that are known to these sources. Number of species listed: 56. Species (Author) Higher Classification Acheliderma fistulatum (Dendy, 1896) Acarnidae : Poecilosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Aplysilla rosea (Barrois, 1876) Darwinellidae : Dendroceratida : Demospongiae : Porifera Aplysina lendenfeldi Bergquist, 1980 Aplysinidae : Verongida : Demospongiae : Porifera Biemna sp. MoV 6699 Desmacellidae : Poecilosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Callyspongia sp. MoV 6674 Callyspongiidae : Haplosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Callyspongia sp. MoV 6675 Callyspongiidae : Haplosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Callyspongia sp. MoV 6676 Callyspongiidae : Haplosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Carteriospongia sp. MoV 6717 Thorectidae : Dictyoceratida : Demospongiae : Porifera Chondropsis kirki Chondropsidae : Poecilosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Chondropsis sp. MoV 6669 Chondropsidae : Poecilosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Chondropsis sp. MoV 6671 Chondropsidae : Poecilosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Chondropsis sp. MoV 6726 Chondropsidae : Poecilosclerida : Demospongiae : Porifera Ciocalypta massalis (Carter, 1883) Halichondriidae : Halichondrida : Demospongiae : Porifera Ciocalypta sp. MoV 6693 Halichondriidae : Halichondrida : Demospongiae : Porifera Clatharinid sp. MoV 6686 Clathrinida : Calcarea
    [Show full text]