The Great Fight by Jeroen Smit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unilever Trading Statement First Quarter 2018 a Good
UNILEVER TRADING STATEMENT FIRST QUARTER 2018 A GOOD START WITH STRONG VOLUME GROWTH Performance highlights Underlying performance GAAP measures vs 2017 vs 2017 Underlying sales growth (USG)(a) 3.4% Turnover €12.6bn (5.2)% USG excluding spreads(a) 3.7% Turnover excluding spreads €11.9bn (5.2)% Quarterly dividend payable in June 2018 €0.3872 per share (a) These amounts do not include any Q1 price growth in Venezuela. See page 5 for further details. • Underlying sales growth excluding spreads 3.7% with volume 3.6% and price 0.1% • Emerging markets underlying sales growth 5.1% with volume 4.3% and price 0.8% • Share buy-back programme of up to €6 billion to start in May 2018 • Quarterly dividend raised 8% to €0.3872 per share Paul Polman: Chief Executive Officer statement “The first quarter demonstrates another good volume-driven performance across all three Divisions. The broad-based growth, including over 4% volume growth in emerging markets, shows that the ‘Connected 4 Growth’ programme is working and enhancing our long-term compounding growth model. We are further improving the quality and speed of our global and local innovation as a result of a more agile, consumer-facing organisation. At the same time, we are maintaining strong delivery from our savings programmes and expecting to complete the exit from spreads in the middle of the year. For the full year, we continue to expect underlying sales growth in the 3% - 5% range and an improvement in underlying operating margin and cash flow that keep us on track for our 2020 goals. -
Logistics Efficiency Development in Distribution and Damage Control”
Internship report On “Logistics Efficiency Development in Distribution and Damage Control” Prepared For: Ms. Mahtab Faruqui Senior Lecturer BRAC Business School BRAC University. Prepared By: Irfan Rafique ID: 08104001 BRAC Business School BRAC University. Date: 23rd January, 2012. Letter of transmittal January 23rd, 2012 Ms. Mahtab Faruqui Senior Lecturer BRAC Business School BRAC University. Subject: Submission of internship report. Dear Madam, I would like to take the opportunity to thank you for the guidance and support you have provided me during the course of this report. I also want to express deep gratuities to Mr. Rezwan Hamid, Territory manager, Tejgoan territory for his cooperation and supervision. In this report this report I tried my level best to provide authentic information. I also tried to reflect my experience driven learning and findings. I request you to excuse me for any mistake despite my best effort. I also appreciate if you enlighten me with your thoughts and views regarding the report. Also, if you wish to enquire about any aspect of my report, I would gladly answer your questions. Yours Sincerely, Irfan Rafique ID: 08104001 BRAC Business School BRAC University ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prosperous conclusion of any course requires support from various personal and I was fortunate to have support, direction and supervision in every aspect from my teacher, Unilever officials and friends. I would also like to express my cordial thanks and gratitude to my supervisor of internship program Ms. Mahtab Faruqui, senior lecturer for farm encouragement as well as guidance in preparing this report. I acknowledge my gratitude to Mr. Rezwan Hamid for his guidance, cooperation and help. -
Table of Contents
The secret structure that steers Defense and Foreign Policy behind the facade of 'Democracy.' SUMMER 2001 - Volume 1, Issue 3 from TrueDemocracy Website Table of Contents EDITORIAL North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT Air Force Office of Space Systems National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 1. The Executive Branch NASA's Ames Research Center Council on Foreign Relations Project Cold Empire Trilateral Commission Project Snowbird The Bilderberg Group Project Aquarius National Security Council Project MILSTAR Joint Chiefs of Staff Project Tacit Rainbow National Program Office Project Timberwind Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Project Code EVA Project Cobra Mist 2. Intelligence Branch Project Cold Witness National Security Agency (NSA) National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) 4. Weapons Industry National Reconnaissance Organization Stanford Research Institute, Inc. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) AT&T Federal Bureau of Investigation , Counter Intelligence Division RAND Corporation (FBI) Edgerton, Germhausen & Greer Corporation Department of Energy Intelligence Wackenhut Corporation NSA's Central Security Service and CIA's Special Bechtel Corporation Security Office United Nuclear Corporation U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) Walsh Construction Company U.S. Navy Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Aerojet (Genstar Corporation) U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) Reynolds Electronics Engineering Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Lear Aircraft Company NASA Intelligence Northrop Corporation Air Force Special Security Service Hughes Aircraft Defense Industry Security Command (DISCO) Lockheed-Maritn Corporation Defense Investigative Service McDonnell-Douglas Corporation Naval Investigative Service (NIS) BDM Corporation Air Force Electronic Security Command General Electric Corporation Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) PSI-TECH Corporation Federal Police Agency Intelligence Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Defense Electronic Security Command Project Deep Water 5. -
1998 Annual Review and Summary Financial Statement
Annual Review1998 Annual Review 1998 And Summary Financial Statement English Version in Guilders And SummaryFinancialStatement English Version inGuilders English Version U Unilever N.V. Unilever PLC meeting everyday needs of people everywhere Weena 455, PO Box 760 PO Box 68, Unilever House 3000 DK Rotterdam Blackfriars, London EC4P 4BQ Telephone +31 (0)10 217 4000 Telephone +44 (0)171 822 5252 Telefax +31 (0)10 217 4798 Telefax +44 (0)171 822 5951 Produced by: Unilever Corporate Relations Department Design: The Partners Photography: Mike Abrahams, Peter Jordan, Barry Lewis, Tom Main, Bill Prentice & Andrew Ward Editorial Consultants: Wardour Communications U Typesetting & print: Westerham Press Limited, St Ives plc Unilever‘s Corporate Purpose Our purpose in Unilever is to meet the everyday needs of people everywhere – to anticipate the aspirations of our consumers and customers and to respond creatively and competitively with branded products and services which raise the quality of life. Our deep roots in local cultures and markets around the world are our unparalleled inheritance and the foundation for our future growth. We will bring our wealth of knowledge and international expertise to the service of local consumers – a truly multi-local multinational. ENGLISH GUILDERS Our long-term success requires a total commitment to exceptional standards of performance and productivity, to working together effectively and to a willingness to embrace new ideas and learn continuously. We believe that to succeed requires the highest standards of corporate behaviour towards our employees, consumers and the societies and world in which we live. This is Unilever’s road to sustainable, profitable growth for our business and long-term value creation for our shareholders and employees. -
Unilever Annual Report & Accounts
DISCLAIMER This is a PDF version of the Annual Report on Form 20-F 2018 and is an exact copy of the document filed with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Certain sections of the Annual Report on Form 20-F 2018 have been audited. These are on pages 75 to 127 and the Guarantor Statements on pages 158 to 162. The maintenance and integrity of the Unilever website is the responsibility of the Directors; the work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration of these matters. Accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially placed on the website. Legislation in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. Except where you are a shareholder, this material is provided for information purposes only and is not, in particular, intended to confer any legal rights on you. This Annual Report on Form 20-F does not constitute an invitation to invest in Unilever shares. Any decisions you make in reliance on this information are solely your responsibility. The information is given as of the dates specified, is not updated, and any forward-looking statements are made subject to the reservations specified in the cautionary statement on the inside back cover of the Annual Report on Form 20-F 2018. Unilever accepts no responsibility for any information on other websites that may be accessed from this site by hyperlinks. MAKING SUSTAINABLE LIVING COMMONPLACE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTENTS FORM 20-F 2018 Strategic Report .............................................................................. -
Case Analysis
Case Analysis COMPETING THROUGH SUSTAINABILITY Introduction Consumer goods giant Unilever is the result of a 1927 merger between a Dutch butter company and an English soap company that encountered each other in the commodities market due to their common use of palm oil. The companies diversified into each other’s product markets becoming competitors before merging to establish Unilever in 1930. Unilever’s founding philosophy held that companies can only prosper if they conduct business ethically and responsibly, which was coined: “doing well by doing good.” Unilever gained success through fast-growing local markets during the postwar consumer boom. However, it overdiversified leading to decreased profits and an ensuing stagnancy that lasted throughout the 1990s. In 2004, Unilever issued its first profit warning amidst deteriorating market share. In 2009, the company brought in its first external CEO, Paul Polman, who committed to doubling revenues while reducing environmental footprint and increasing societal impact. In 2010, Polman introduced a bold sustainability-focused transformational strategy called Unilever Sustainable Living Plan (USLP). The highly measurable plan set three goals to reach by 2020: improve the wellbeing of a billion people, halve its environmental footprint, and enhance life for everyone in its value chain. Problem Statement Polman announced 2014 results, which were largely positive. The company grew ahead of slowing worldwide markets, saw internal growth for its fifth consecutive year, and produced an 18% increase in shareholder returns. USLP program results were also strong with 7 of 9 pillars remaining on track and only 7 of 67 metrics being off track. However, Polman warned of “strong headwinds” created by external factors beyond Unilever’s control, such as stalling developed markets and slowing emerging markets. -
In Honor of the 10Th Anniversary of the Skoll World Forum
Voices on Society The art and science of delivery In honor of the 10th anniversary of the Skoll World Forum COPYRIGHT © 2013 MCKINSEY & COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE COPIED OR REDISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF MCKINSEY & COMPANY. de·liv·ery | di-’li-v(e-)ré The art and science of delivering improvements in health care, education, food security, financial services, and other arenas to the people that need them most—at scale, effectively, efficiently, and sustainably. Visit our website: mckinseyonsociety.com Join the conversation on Twitter: @McKinseySociety 3 | Voices on Society | The art and science of delivery | Contents 05 07 10 10 10 13 15 17 19 21 21 24 24 26 28 28 30 32 35 38 Contents Preface 1. Manage and lead 2. Scale what works 05 Norbert Dörr | McKinsey & Company 10 Kathleen McLaughlin, 24 Beatriz Perez and Guy Wollaert | 07 Sally Osberg | The Skoll Foundation Jens Riese, and Lynn Taliento | The Coca-Cola Company McKinsey & Company 26 Nitin Paranjpe | Hindustan Unilever 13 Tony Blair | African Governance 28 Salman Khan and Jessica Yuen | Initiative Khan Academy 15 Sir Michael Barber | Pearson 30 Michael Schlein | Accion 17 Pravin Gordhan | Minister of 32 Yvette Alberdingk Thijm | Witness finance, Republic of South Africa 19 Dambisa Moyo | Economist and Author 21 Shaina Doar and Jonathan K. Law | McKinsey & Company 4 | Voices on Society | The art and science of delivery | Contents 3. Issue focus: Health and hunger 4. The future of delivery 35 Muhammad Ali Pate | Minister of 53 Jim Yong Kim | World Bank Group state for health, Nigeria 55 André Dua | McKinsey & Company 38 Jamie Oliver | Better Food 57 Karim Khoja | Roshan Foundation 59 Patrick Meier | Qatar Computing 40 Julia Martin | Office of the US Global Research Institute AIDS Coordinator 62 Eoin Daly and Seelan Singham | 42 Andrew Youn | One Acre Fund McKinsey & Company 44 Steve Davis and Anurag Mairal | 64 Richard McGill Murphy and Denielle Sachs | PATH McKinsey & Company 46 Feike Sijbesma | Royal DSM 49 Helene D. -
Case Study: Unilever1
CASE STUDY: UNILEVER1 1. Introduction Unilever is a British-Dutch company that operates in the market of consumer goods and sells its products in around 190 countries. Another remarkable fact is that they own more than 400 brands, what means an important diversification in both risk and the products they sell, among which there is food, personal care products and cleaning agents. In fact, twelve of these brands have sales of more than a billion euros. The importance of this multinational is reflected too in the fact 2.5 billion people use Unilever products every day, being part of their daily life. They also are responsible for the employment of 161,000 people in the different countries they operate. Finally, they believe in a sustainable business plan in which they reduce the environmental footprint and increase their positive social impact at the time they keep growing. 2. History Unilever was officially formed in 1929 by the merger of a margarine Dutch company and a British soapmaker. The margarine company of Netherlands was also a merger between the first margarine factory called in the world and another factory of the same product and from the same city, Oss, in the Netherlands. The soapmaker company revolutionized the market because it helped to a more hygienic society and the manufacturing of the product was wrapped. The name of the company is a fusion between the Dutch firm called Margarine Unie and the British firm called Lever Brothers. What Unilever did, was to expand its market locations to the American Latin and Africa. Moreover they widened the product areas to new sectors such as particular food and chemical products. -
Unilever Expands Sustainable Living Ambition 06052014
Unilever expands sustainable living ambition 06052014 06052014 : Unilever has announced a third year of good progress on the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan. Unilever has announced a third year of good progress on the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan, and an intention to expand further its sustainable living ambition to bring about broader change on a global scale. Commenting on progress, Unilever CEO, Paul Polman said: “In the three years since we launched the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan we have learned that sustainability drives business growth and a much deeper connection with our employees and consumers. In 2013, we’ve seen good progress, particularly on targets within our direct control. Our Plan is helping us to save money, reduce risk and drive innovation, and brands that have done the most to embrace sustainable living, like Dove, Lifebuoy, Pureit and Domestos, are enjoying some of our fastest growth.” In addressing the 100 senior sustainability experts including academics, NGOs, government and business who attended the ‘Making Progress, Driving Change’ event in London today, Polman explained that the company will continue to focus its scale, influence, expertise, and resources on making a fundamental change to entire systems, not just incremental improvements. This will involve stepping up plans to tackle several major global sustainability challenges, including: helping to combat climate change by working to eliminate deforestation, which accounts for up to 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions improving food security -
SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, and LAND-USE CHANGES DURING the MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD on ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHO
SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, AND LAND-USE CHANGES DURING THE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHOE BERGH (Under the Direction of Elizabeth J. Reitz) ABSTRACT This research examines the human-environment interactions on St. Catherines Island, Georgia, during the late Woodland through the Mississippian period (AD 800–1580). Results from multiple analyses indicate that socio-political, demographic, and economic changes during this period were associated with changes in subsistence, settlement, and land-use patterns. Archaeofaunal collections of vertebrates and invertebrates are examined from three sites in a single locality, representing human occupation during the entire Mississippian period—9LI21, 9LI229, and 9LI230. Two additional late Mississippian archaeofaunal collections of vertebrates are examined from different island locations—9LI207 and 9LI1637. Fine-grained recovery techniques, not previously used for Mississippian deposits on St. Catherines Island, produced collections dominated by estuarine resources, especially oysters, clams, stout tagelus, sea catfishes, mullets, killifishes, and drums. Previous methods used to recover faunal remains produced collections dominated by deer. This study suggests that, though deer contributed large amounts of meat to the diet, estuarine resources were more abundant and contributed the most meat. A Mississippian chiefdom developed on the island during the Irene phase (AD 1300– 1580), with social inequality, large and dense populations living in communities of multiple, integrated settlements, and maize farming. Zooarchaeological evidence presented in this study suggests these socio-political changes led to new human-environment interactions, compared to the early Mississippian period. Irene peoples used a larger number and wider variety of shellfishing and fishing locations than early Mississippian folk. The Irene fishing strategy caught more large fishes and may have involved a shift to larger-scale mass-capture techniques, such as weirs. -
Download Download
Transnational Corporate Ties: A Synopsis of Theories and Empirical Findings Michael Nollert introduction or sociologists and analysts of the world economy, it is certainly a matter of Ffact that transnational corporations are by no means isolated actors in an economic “war of all against all” (Th omas Hobbes). Rather, transnational cor- porations are frequently members of corporate networks, often of global reach. Although the literature on globalization emphasizes the increasing economic power of these networks and postulates the formation of a transnational capital- ist class, there is still a lack of empirical fi ndings. Th is article starts with a review of theoretical perspectives (resource dependence, social capital, coordination of markets, fi nancial hegemony, class hegemony, inner circle, and transnational capitalist class) which focuses on the functions and structures of corporate inter- locks at the national and the transnational level. Th e subsequent section off ers a synopsis of studies concerning transnational corporate networks. Th ese analyses of corporate ties (interlocking directorates, fi nancial participations and policy group affi liations) suggest the emergence of transnational economic elites whose members, however, have not lost their national identity. In the fi nal section, the theoretical perspectives will be assessed and some prospects are sketched out. Finally, it will be argued that the disintegration of the world society, which is considerably driven by rent-seeking corporate networks, can only be restrained if a potential global regulatory agency will be anchored in a post-Washington consensus. abstract: In general, corporations are not isolated pirical studies concerning transnational cor- actors in an economic “war of all against all” porate networks. -
The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20Pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2
16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 1 The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2 Unilever House, London, c1930 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 03 In September 1929 an agreement was signed which created what The Economist described as "one of the biggest industrial amalgamations in European history". It provided for the merger in the following year of the Margarine Union and Lever Brothers Limited. The Margarine Union had been formed in 1927 by the Van den Bergh and Jurgens companies based in the Netherlands, and was later joined by a number of other Dutch and central European companies. Its main strength lay in Europe, especially Germany and the UK and its interests, whilst mostly in margarine and other edible fats, were also oil milling and animal feeds, retail companies and some soap production. Lever Brothers Limited was based in the UK but owned companies throughout the world, especially in Europe, the United States and the British Dominions. Its interests were in soap, toilet preparations, food (including some margarine), oil milling and animal feeds, plantations and African trading. One of the main reasons for the merger was competition for raw materials - animal and vegetable oils - used in both the manufacture of margarine and soap. However, the two businesses were very similar, so it made sense to merge as Unilever rather than continue to compete for the same raw materials and in the same markets. To understand how Unilever came into being you have to go back to the family companies that were instrumental in its formation.