DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Palaeontological Overview TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prior to fieldwork, a literature survey was conducted to identify potential areas of palaeontological interest to Parks Canada, BC Parks and to the Geological Survey of Canada. Both the Existing and Proposed routes as well as the access roads were assessed and two areas were highlighted for thorough examination. These areas are from KP/KL 312 to KP/KL 318 for the potential Upper Cretaceous fossils, and between KP/KL 349 and KP/KL 351 for the potential Devonian Carboniferous fossils. The area between Hinton and Kia Nea Lake (KP/KL 310.1 to KP/KL 321) is underlain by the Brazeau Formation and previous work conducted within this formation has discovered plant macrofossils and fresh water turtles. These formations are not well exposed along the Proposed and Existing routes; however, exposures adjacent to the routes indicate that they are close to the surface and will likely be intersected during trenching. The area from Jasper townsite west is underlain by Precambrian strata and is, therefore, unfossiliferous except for possible Holocene vertebrates. Much of the Local Study Area (LSA) is underlain by Pleistocene outwash gravels and Holocene terrace gravels and loess. The only fossils observed during the field survey were in the bedrock between KP/KL 349 and KP/KL 351. Here strata of the Palliser, Banff, Ranger Canyon and Mowitch formations will be impacted. In the area of proposed access road widening along Celestine Lake Road in Jasper National Park, outcrops of the Banff Formation are extremely fossiliferous with extensive beds of crinoid ossicles, brachiopods, solitary and colonial corals and fenestrate bryozoans. No fossils were found that required removal prior to construction. However, it is recommended that: 1. The area between KP/KL 310.1 and KP/KL 318 should be monitored during trenching to assess the palaeontological potential of the Upper Cretaceous Brazeau-Coalspur formations (formerly Brazeau to Horseshoe Canyon Formation) which elsewhere is rich in plant macrofossils and is known to yield a diverse vertebrate, invertebrate and plant macrofossil suite. 2. Both the road widening along Celestine Lake Road and the selected route be monitored during construction for potential fossils between KP/KL 349.5 and KP/KL 350.5. If valuable fossils are uncovered, detailed sections should be drafted of these strata as the fresh exposures will provide complete sections of the Palliser to Mowitch Formation. The lithological description and microfossil analysis (conodonts, forams) of these drafts could provide future reference samples for interested researchers. Page i Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Palaeontological Overview TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Route Options ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 APPROACH ..................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 QUATERNARY DEPOSITS (KP/KL 310.1 TO KP/KL 468) VARIABLY PRESENT ALONG THE ROUTES .................................................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Palaeontology ..................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 3 5.0 UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATA (KP/KL 310.1 TO KP/KL 321) ................................................... 3 5.1 Palaeontology ..................................................................................................................... 3 5.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 4 6.0 DEVONIAN – MISSISSIPPIAN – PERMIAN STRATA (KP/KL 349 TO KP/KL 350.6).................... 4 6.1 Palliser Formation (Upper Devonian, Famenian) ............................................................... 4 6.1.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 4 6.1.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 4 6.2 Exshaw Formation Upper Devonian (Upper Famenian to Lower Carboniferous) .............. 4 6.2.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 4 6.2.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 4 6.3 Banff Formation (KP and KL 350.4 to KP/KL 350.6) .......................................................... 5 6.3.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 5 6.3.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 5 6.4 Rundle Formation (Group) Middle and Upper Mississippian (KP/KL 349.6 to KP/KL 350.3)....................................................................................................................... 6 6.4.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 6 6.4.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 6 6.5 Ranger Canyon Formation (= Greenock Formation) (Roadian-Wordian) Permian (KP/KL 350.3 to KP/KL 350.4) ............................................................................................ 6 6.5.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 6 6.5.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 6 6.6 Mowitch Formation (= Upper Member of Greenoch Formation of Brown, 1952) Permian (Roadian to Wordian) (KP/KL 350.4 to KP/KL 350.6) .......................................... 7 6.6.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 7 6.6.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 7 6.7 Precambrian Strata (Hadrynian) (KP/KL 372.8 to KP and KL 460) .................................... 7 6.7.1 Palaeontology ........................................................................................................ 7 6.7.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 8 7.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................ 8 8.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................. 8 Page ii Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Palaeontological Overview TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Figures ..............................................................................................................................A1 Appendix B Photoplates .......................................................................................................................B1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 TMX - Anchor Loop Project................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2 Geology of the Hinton to Rocky Mountain Trench and Overlay for Quaternary Geology Map (Roed 1975).................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3 Quaternary Geological Map of the Hinton Area (Roed 1975)............................................. 4 Figure 4 Diagramatic stratigraphy and correlation of Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous strata in the western Canada Sedimentary Basin (Richards and Higgins 1988). Note that the erosional surface that eliminates the Upper Morro and Costigan members (Palliser Formation) and Exshaw Formation in the Jasper area. .................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 5 Sketch map outlining the position of Brown’s (1952) study area, Mount Greenock, Alberta (Brown 1952). Note the extent of drift covered area. The proposed pipeline is mostly within the drift covered area except south of Mount Greenock where Devonian to Permain strata are intersected................................. 6 Figure 6 Range of Carboniferous brachiopods in thrust block I (Brown 1952). See Figure 5 for location. ........................................................................................................... 7 Figure 7 Range of Carboniferous brachiopods in thrust block II (Brown 1952) ................................ 7 Figure 8 Ranges of Carboniferous brachiopods
Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park

    A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park

    A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park David W. Mayhood Part 3 of a Fish Management Plan for Jasper National Park Freshwater Research Limited A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park David W. Mayhood FWR Freshwater Research Limited Calgary, Alberta Prepared for Canadian Parks Service Jasper National Park Jasper, Alberta Part 3 of a Fish Management Plan for Jasper National Park July 1992 Cover & Title Page. Alexander Bajkov’s drawings of bull trout from Jacques Lake, Jasper National Park (Bajkov 1927:334-335). Top: Bajkov’s Figure 2, captioned “Head of specimen of Salvelinus alpinus malma, [female], 500 mm. in length from Jaques [sic] Lake.” Bottom: Bajkov’s Figure 3, captioned “Head of specimen of Salvelinus alpinus malma, [male], 590 mm. in length, from Jaques [sic] Lake.” Although only sketches, Bajkov’s figures well illustrate the most characteristic features of this most characteristic Jasper native fish. These are: the terminal mouth cleft bisecting the anterior profile at its midpoint, the elongated head with tapered snout, flat skull, long lower jaw, and eyes placed high on the head (Cavender 1980:300-302; compare with Cavender’s Figure 3). The head structure of bull trout is well suited to an ambush-type predatory style, in which the charr rests on the bottom and watches for prey to pass over. ABSTRACT I conducted an extensive survey of published and unpublished documents to identify the native fish stocks of Jasper National Park, describe their original condition, determine if there is anything unusual or especially significant about them, assess their present condition, outline what is known of their biology and life history, and outline what measures should be taken to manage and protect them.
  • Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(S): J

    Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(S): J

    Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(s): J. Norman Collie Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Mar., 1912), pp. 223-233 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1778435 Accessed: 12-06-2016 07:31 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley, The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 155.69.24.171 on Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:31:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms EXPLORATION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. 223 overtures to Bhutan and Nepal, which have been rejected by these states, and I am very glad they have been. The Chinese should not be allowed on the Indian side of the Himalayas. The President : We will conclude with a vote of thanks to Mr. Rose for his excellent paper. EXPLORATION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS NORTH OF THE YELLOWHEAD PASS.* By J. NORMAN OOLLIE, Ph.D., LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S., etc. The part of the Koeky mountains, that run north through what is now the Dominion of Canada, have only in the last twenty-five years been made accessible to the ordinary traveller.
  • Councillor Biographies

    Councillor Biographies

    BIOGRAPHIES OF COUNCIL MEMBERS The following biographies were complied from the vast information found at the City of Edmonton Archives. Please feel free to contact the Office of the City Clerk or the City of Edmonton Archives if you have more information regarding any of the people mentioned in the following pages. The sources used for each of the biographies are found at the end of each individual summary. Please note that photos and additional biographies of these Mayors, Aldermen and Councillors are available on the Edmonton Public Library website at: http://www.epl.ca/edmonton-history/edmonton-elections/biographies-mayors-and- councillors?id=K A B C D E F G H I, J, K L M N, O P Q, R S T U, V, W, X, Y, Z Please select the first letter of the last name to look up a member of Council. ABBOTT, PERCY W. Alderman, 1920-1921 Born on April 29, 1882 in Lucan, Ontario where he was educated. Left Lucan at 17 and relocated to Stony Plain, Alberta where he taught school from 1901 to 1902. He then joined the law firm of Taylor and Boyle and in 1909 was admitted to the bar. He was on the Board of Trade and was a member of the Library Board for two years. He married Margaret McIntyre in 1908. They had three daughters. He died at the age of 60. Source: Edmonton Bulletin, Nov. 9, 1942 - City of Edmonton Archives ADAIR, JOSEPH W. Alderman, 1921-1924 Born in 1877 in Glasgow. Came to Canada in 1899 and worked on newspapers in Toronto and Winnipeg.
  • 7. Gas (Tight) Sands

    7. Gas (Tight) Sands

    Tight-Gas Sands Committee Report EMD Annual Meeting, April 2014 by Fran Hein, P. Geol., Chair Vice Chairs: • TBA, (Vice-Chair, Industry) • Dean Rokosh (Vice-Chair, Government) • Linyun Tan, (Vice-Chair, Academic) Advisory Committee: • Faruk Alpak, Shell International E&P, AAPG Gulf Coast Section • Mohammed S. Ameen, Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia, AAPG Middle East Section • Jamel Assad, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, AAPG Gulf Coast Section • Dean Rokosh, Alberta Geological Survey, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, AAPG Canadian Section • Robert Cluff, The Discovery Group, Denver, Colorado, AAPG Rocky Mountain Section • Anthony Cortis, JinQiu Venture, Chengdu, China, AAPG Asia/Pacific Section • Mohamed El Deghedy, Cairo University, President of AAPG Cairo University Chapter, AAPG Africa Section • Christopher Ezeh, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, AAPG Africa Section • Matthew Grove, ExxonMobil, AAPG Gulf Coast Section • Brent Hale, William M. Cobb & Associates, AAPG Southwest Section • Frances J. Hein, Alberta Energy Regulator, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, AAPG Canadian Section • Xavier Moonan, Petrotin, AAPG Latin America Section • Rebecca Morgan, Baker Hughes, AAPG Gulf Coast Section • Renfang Pan, Yangtze University, China, AAPG Asia Pacific Section • Salma Rafi, Department of Geology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, AAPG Middle East Section • Christopher Simon, SM-Energy, AAPG Gulf Coast Section • Linyun Tan, Chongqing Institute of Geological and Mineral Resources, China, AAPG Asia Pacific Section • Jia Zheng, China University of Petroleum, AAPG Asia Pacific Section 1 Executive Summary Tight gas is an unconventional type of hydrocarbon resource within reservoirs that are low permeability (millidarcy to microdarcies range) and low porosity, as in ‘tight sand’. “Distal” unconventional tight-gas sands (with high sandy silt/siltstone content, low clay/shale content, but with self sourced organics) have more recently been called “hybrid” shales.
  • (Foram in Ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous

    (Foram in Ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous

    MicropaIeontoIogicaI Zonation (Foramin ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, Southeastern Alaska By BERNARD L. MAMET, SYLVIE PINARD, and AUGUSTUS K. ARMSTRONG U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2031 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Text and illustrations edited by Mary Lou Callas Line drawings prepared by B.L. Mamet and Stephen Scott Layout and design by Lisa Baserga UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mamet, Bernard L. Micropaleontological zonation (foraminifers, algae) and stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, southeastern Alaska / by Bernard L. Mamet, Sylvie Pinard, and Augustus K. Armstrong. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2031) Includes bibtiographical references. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Carboniferous. 2. Geology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 3. Foraminifera, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 4. Algae, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 5. Paleontology- Carboniferous. 6. Paleontology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. I. Pinard, Sylvie. II. Armstrong, Augustus K. Ill. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2031 [QE671I 557.3 s--dc20 [551.7'5'097982] 92-32905 CIP CONTENTS Abstract
  • Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Program Maps

    Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Program Maps

    VU32 VU33 VU44 VU36 V28A 947 U Muriel Lake UV 63 Westlock County VU M.D. of Bonnyville No. 87 18 U18 Westlock VU Smoky Lake County 28 M.D. of Greenview No. 16 VU40 V VU Woodlands County Whitecourt County of Barrhead No. 11 Thorhild County Smoky Lake Barrhead 32 St. Paul VU County of St. Paul No. 19 Frog Lake VU18 VU2 Redwater Elk Point Mayerthorpe Legal Grande Cache VU36 U38 VU43 V Bon Accord 28A Lac Ste. Anne County Sturgeon County UV 28 Gibbons Bruderheim VU22 Morinville VU Lamont County Edson Riv Eds er on R Lamont iver County of Two Hills No. 21 37 U15 I.D. No. 25 Willmore Wilderness Lac Ste. Anne VU V VU15 VU45 r Onoway e iv 28A S R UV 45 U m V n o o Chip Lake e k g Elk Island National Park of Canada y r R tu i S v e Mundare r r e Edson 22 St. Albert 41 v VU i U31 Spruce Grove VU R V Elk Island National Park of Canada 16A d Wabamun Lake 16A 16A 16A UV o VV 216 e UU UV VU L 17 c Parkland County Stony Plain Vegreville VU M VU14 Yellowhead County Edmonton Beaverhill Lake Strathcona County County of Vermilion River VU60 9 16 Vermilion VU Hinton County of Minburn No. 27 VU47 Tofield E r i Devon Beaumont Lloydminster t h 19 21 VU R VU i r v 16 e e U V r v i R y Calmar k o Leduc Beaver County m S Leduc County Drayton Valley VU40 VU39 R o c k y 17 Brazeau County U R V i Viking v e 2A r VU 40 VU Millet VU26 Pigeon Lake Camrose 13A 13 UV M U13 VU i V e 13A tt V e Elk River U R County of Wetaskiwin No.
  • PDF Linkchapter

    PDF Linkchapter

    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abietites, 21. 22, 231, 236 Araun tributaries, 264 south coast, 304, 310 linkii, 231 Amuro-Zejan Basin, 11, 264 west coast basins, 304, 318 Absaroka fault, 95 Anadyr River, 266 Azolla, 31 Absaroka thrust, 88 Anadyrian basin, 266 acrotelm, 3 anastomosing fluvial system, 231, back-barrier island, 220 Adavale basin fill, 304 232, 233, 242 back barrier/outer lagoon zones, 220 Adaville Formation, 69, 98 Anderson coal, 58, 63 backswamps, 343 channels, 88 Anderson mire, 63 Baculites mclearni, 140 coal seams, 82 andesite, 288 Baffin Island, 11 depositional history, 88 angiosperms, 10, 18, 19, 24, 28, 31, Baiera, 23, 26 lithofacies, 75 47, 180, 392 Baikalia, eastern, 288 regional paleogeography, 88 Ango-Paris Basin, 227 Bakony Mountains, 245 rock types, 70 ankerite, 64, 65 Bakonyjako area, 251 sedimentation model, 90 Anomia Balmer North Mine, 134, 138 stratigraphy, 70 gryphorynchus, 70 Balmer peat swamp, 135 Addis Ababa, Shewa province, 373 propatorius, 70 Balmer seam, 118, 135 Adelaide Island, 389 anoxia, 3 Banks Island, 1 I Adelie Land margin, 390 Antarctic Peninsula, 31, 388, 389, Baojiatun Formation, Xuetiandi, 298 Afikpo area, 378 392 Barclay Seam, 338 Africa, 20 Antarctica, 385, 393 Barents Sea Shelf, 209 West, 369, 373, 376 climatic model, 392 barite, 63 agglomerates, 287, 330 coal deposits (Cretaceous), 388 Barremian, 11, 209 aggradation, 215, 216, 223 coal potential (Cretaceous), 385 Barriada Member, 195 Ahaggar Mountains, 375 East, 385, 388, 393 barrier beach, 242 Ajka area, 245,248,249,
  • PINE VALLEY Mount Wabi to Solitude Mountain Northeastern British Columbia

    PINE VALLEY Mount Wabi to Solitude Mountain Northeastern British Columbia

    BRITISHCOLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND PETROLEUMRESOURCES HoN. D.L. BROTHERS,Minister K. B. BLAKEY,Deputy Minister ~~ BULLETIN No. 52 GEOLOGY of the PINE VALLEY Mount Wabi to Solitude Mountain Northeastern British Columbia by J. E. HUGHES GEOLOGY OF THE PINE .VALLEY Mount Wabi to Solitude Mountain Northeastern British Columbia SUMMARY 1. The map-area covers the Pine Valley, in the Rocky Mountain Foothills of northeastern British Columbia, from latitude 55 degrees 30 minutes to latitude 55 degrees 45 minutes north. 2. The exposed rocks are Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous in age. The suc- cession (Ladinian to Cenomanian) is between 10,000 and 20,000 feet thick, and mostly of marine deposition. Most stratigraphic units thicken westward. 3. In the Triassic, the Grey Beds contain limestones, dolomites, siltstones, and sandstones; and the overlying PardonetFormation, argillaceous limestones with fossil shell beds of Halobia and Monotis. 4. The Fernie Group of Jurassic age consists of: thin limestone, interbedded shales and siltstones with cherty banding, the Nordegg Beds; followed by the Middle Shales; and in the upper part, interbedded shales, siltstones, and sandstone:;, the Transition Beds, which mark the change to Beaudette deposition. 5. The Beaudette Group of late Jurassic to early Cretaceous age has three formations: the Monteith, thick sandstones mostly, and with quartzites in the 'upper third part; the BeattiePeaks, interbedded shales, siltstones, andsandstones; and the Monach Formation,sandstones, with or without quartzite beds at the top. Facies changes and incomplete outcrops make it advisable to map Beaudette strata as an undivided unit to the west. 6. Coal measures overlying Beaudette strata are described by the term Crassier Group.
  • Structural Geology of the Southern Livingstone Range

    Structural Geology of the Southern Livingstone Range

    Meteoric fluid isotopic signatures of thrust-fault-related veins in the Livingstone Range anticlinorium and their significance for syn-deformational regional fluid migration Michael A. Cooley*, Raymond A. Price, John M. Dixon, and T. Kurtis Kyser Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering Queen’s University, Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6 [email protected] ABSTRACT δ13C and δ18O isotope values of calcite in veins and host rocks from thrust fault zones indicate that fluids with meteoric isotopic signatures were present along thrust faults and infiltrating the tip-lines of minor thrusts during the formation of fault-propagation folds in the Livingstone Range Anticlinorium of southwest Alberta. Isotope geochemistry of cross-fault veins indicates that formation fluids predominated within the transverse structures, implying that cross faults were not conduits for local downward infiltration of meteoric water. Meteoric fluids must have been flowing eastward along the major thrust faults from a recharge area in the topographically higher hinterland to the west during formation of the thrust and fold belt. The incursion of meteoric waters coincided with hydrocarbon migration as indicated by hydrocarbon residues within thrust- fault-related calcite veins. Introduction The Livingstone Range of the southern Alberta foothills comprises the easternmost surface exposures of Carboniferous rocks in the southern Canadian Cordillera (Fig. 1). The Livingstone Range is an anticlinorium that developed where the Livingstone thrust cuts up-section in its hanging wall from a regional detachment in the upper Palliser Formation, through the overlying Mississippian Rundle Group and younger strata to an upper detachment within the Jurassic Fernie Formation. The anticlinorium comprises two to three adjacent fault- propagation fold anticlines which contain thrust faults that die out upwards into the cores of the folds.
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Alberta Highway #93 "Icefields Parkway, Jasper to Lake Louise, Banff"

    Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Alberta Highway #93 "Icefields Parkway, Jasper to Lake Louise, Banff"

    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Alberta Highway #93 "Icefields Parkway, Jasper to Lake Louise, Banff" Kms ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Junction of Highways #93 This highway is a toll highway, They have a seniors rate. & #16 Yellowhead Route NOTE, There is no FUEL, for 156kms. This highway passes through Jasper and Banff National Parks. Altitude: 3471 feet 0.0 The Town of Jasper, East To Hinton, Alberta, Edson, Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. For travel Alberta - Junction of East see Milebymile.com - Alberta Road Map Travel Guide, Edmonton Highways #93 & #16 to Jasper, Alberta/British Columbia Border, for driving directions. Yellowhead Route - Jasper Altitude: 3471 feet National Park 0.0 Junction of Highways #93 West to Prince George, B.C., Kamloops, B.C.. & #16 Yellowhead Route - For travel West see Milebymile.com - Alberta Road Map Travel Guide, Jasper National Park Edmonton to Jasper, Alberta/British Columbia Border for driving directions. Altitude: 3471 feet 0.7 Pull Out Area Miette River bridge crossing - Jasper National Park. Altitude: 3432 feet 1.8 Access Road - Jasper Whistlers Campground, AB; Camping, 100 elec and 604 non elec sites. National Park, AB Jasper Tramway, Jasper National Park Whistlers International Hostel, AB. Altitude: 3419 feet 3.4 Wapiti Campground - Camping 40 elec sites, 57 non elec. Jasper National Park. This campground is open all year. Altitude: 3504 feet 5.0 Beckers Chalet Accommodations Altitude: 3543 feet 5.0 View from highway. Driving south, Jasper National Park, Alberta. Altitude: 3560 feet 6.1 Icefields Parkway -Jasper Toll Gate, They have a Seniors rate you have to ask for it.
  • Evaluation and Interpretation of Convolutional-Recurrent Networks For

    Evaluation and Interpretation of Convolutional-Recurrent Networks For

    https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-113 Preprint. Discussion started: 11 March 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Evaluation and interpretation of convolutional-recurrent networks for regional hydrological modelling Sam Anderson1, Valentina Radic1 1Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada 5 Correspondence to: Sam Anderson ([email protected]) Abstract. Deep learning has emerged as a useful tool across geoscience disciplines; however, there remain outstanding questions regarding the suitability of unexplored model architectures and how to interpret model learning for regional scale hydrological modelling. Here we use a convolutional-recurrent network, a deep learning approach for learning both spatial 10 and temporal patterns, to predict streamflow at 226 stream gauges across the region of southwestern Canada. The model is forced by gridded climate reanalysis data and trained to predict observed daily streamflow between 1979 and 2015. To interpret the model learning of both spatial and temporal patterns, we introduce two experiments with evaluation metrics to track the model’s response to perturbations in the input data. The model performs well in simulating the daily streamflow over the testing period, with a median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.68 and 35% of stations having NSE > 0.8. When 15 predicting streamflow, the model is most sensitive to perturbations in the input data prescribed near and within the basins being predicted, demonstrating that the model is automatically learning to focus on physically realistic areas. When uniformly perturbing input temperature timeseries to obtain relatively warmer and colder input data, the modelled freshet timing and intensity changes in accordance with the transition timing from below- to above-freezing temperatures.
  • Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron

    Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron

    Field Guide to Selected Geological Sections of the Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron Edmonton Geological Society Field Trip Guide September 22-23, 2007 Introduction The Rocky Mountains can be divided into Foothills, Front Ranges, and Main Ranges as shown in the cartoon below (Fig. 1). Outcrops in the foothills are dominated by softer weathering Mesozoic rocks of the foreland basin: mainly sandstone and shale but also including conglomerates and coal. Most of the clastic rocks represent material eroded from earlier-formed parts of the orogen to the west, which was subsequently cannibalized as the thrustbelt advanced westward in late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic time. Locally in the foothills, the more resistant late Paleozoic carbonate rocks come to the surface in elongated ridges. Saturday's traverse will begin in the foothills of the Cadomin area and proceed southwest into the Front Ranges. In the Front Ranges carbonates dominate the landscape. These represent the late Paleozoic continental margin of the Laurentian continent, now sliced into multiple imbricated thrust sheets. Mesozoic clastics are confined to narrow valleys. On Sunday morning we will take the Yellowhead Highway further into the Front Ranges and eventually into the Main Ranges of the Rockies. In the Main Ranges, lower parts of the stratigraphy are preserved, including widespread outcrops of older, Early Paleozoic carbonates, clastics, and the underlying Proterozoic succession of the Windermere Supergroup. The structural style is different, too. Although thrust sheets are present, they are generally much larger in scale, and their dips are gentler. In addition, the rocks were more ductile when deformed, so that cleavage and folds are much more widely developed in the mudrocks.