DOCSLIB.ORG

Application Acknowledgement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application Acknowledgement DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR DECISION 6th SEPTEMBER 2016 Ladies and Gentlemen, The applications within this report have been submitted for determination under the Town and Country Planning Acts and associated legislation. All applications within this report are “Delegated” to this Committee but can be moved “Non-Delegated” by a Member of the Committee under the terms adopted for the Scheme of Delegation approved by Council, 16th May, 1994. Any such motion needs to be accepted by a majority of Members of the Committee present (Council, 8th August, 1995). All applications left as Delegated will be decided by the Committee and will not be subject to confirmation by Council. The application plan numbers also refer to files for the purposes of background papers. Jason Hipkiss Planning Manager PLANNING COMMITTEE th 6 September 2016 PLAN NUMBER: APPLICANT: AGENT: 2016/0354 Mr Jon Cooper Centrica Mr Richard Turner Distributed Generation Ltd RPS Planning and Development WARD/PARISH: CASE OFFICER: DATE RECEIVED: Roosecote Charles Wilton 29/04/2016 01229 876553 STATUTORY DATE: 11/08/2016 LOCATION: Former Roosecote Power Station, Rampside Road Barrow-in-Furness PROPOSAL: Town & Country Planning under regulation 5 (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011- Screening opinion in relation to a proposed gas-fired electricity generating plant SAVED POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN: SUMMARY OF MAIN ISSUES: Proposal is not considered to be EIA development. Whilst the development site area exceeds 0.5 hectares and is therefore Schedule 2 development, it is likely to only have an environmental impact of local significance. NON MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS: REPRESENTATIONS: CONSULTATIONS: OFFICERS REPORT: 1. Background 1.1 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England & Wales) Regulations, also known as the EIA Regulations, and recently updated in 2011, form part of the development control system in England and relate to certain types of development. The Regulations evolved from a European Union Directive and give planning authorities a means of ensuring that they can take account of the environmental Page 1 of 75 PLANNING COMMITTEE th 6 September 2016 implications of individual developments in their decisions on planning applications. The Regulations also place a number of responsibilities on planning authorities, which relate to the different stages of the EIA process. 1.2 Only certain types of development are subject to the Regulations, and the process by which this is determined is called 'screening'. A developer can ask the planning authority to give a screening opinion prior to submitting their application, or the Authority can adopt a screening procedure during the consideration of it. This is purely a technical exercise, and there is no formal requirement to consult third parties. 1.3 The Regulations include two lists of different types of development projects, Schedules 1 and 2. 1.4 1.4 Schedule 1 identifies major projects for which EIA is mandatory (e.g. integrated industrial chemical plants, large scale thermal and nuclear power stations). 1.5 The second list, called Schedule 2, categorises the types of proposals for which EIA may be required, and cites an area threshold for each category above which a screening opinion should be carried out. Under this legislation, only a development in Schedule 2 that exceeds the threshold and is likely to have ‘significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its size, nature or location’ would require the submission of an Environmental Statement. 2. Site 2.1 The application site comprises an area of vacant land which was formerly occupied by the Roosecote Power Station including gas works, fuel tanks, pumping house and ancillary operational buildings, prior to it being demolished in 2015. The total application site comprises an area of 0.6 hectares. 2.2 The site is located between the coast to the west and substantial industrial development, namely Roosecote Substation to the north, Salthouse Pool waste water treatment works to the North West, Rampside Gas Terminal to the south and undeveloped land to the east. The Site is accessed via a private road some 500m in length off the A5087 (Rampside Road). 2.3 A public right of way runs to the west of the site as part of the Cumbria Coastal Way (CCW). The CCW is separated from the site in parts by small trees and scrub. Beyond the CCW, further west, Roosecote Sands is characterised by sand dune scrub and dense salt marsh plants. 2.4 The built up area of Roose is approximately 600m from the proposed development. 3. Proposal 3.1 The proposed development is described on the submitted application form as “development of a gas-fired reserve electricity generating plant”. The applicant refers to the proposed development as a gas-fired energy reserve facility within the accompanying Planning Statement and associated reports. Page 2 of 75 PLANNING COMMITTEE th 6 September 2016 3.2 The proposed gas-fired energy reserve facility comprises the following: A main engine hall, having a maximum footprint of 54m by 28m, and a maximum height of 14m. The engine hall building is proposed to house up to five small gas engines. Attached to the engine hall will be up to five stacks, to a maximum of 30m in height. The engine hall building is proposed to be of steel clad construction with a pitched roof and central ridge; Installation of ancillary plant and infrastructure on hardstandings to include: o A gas skid, comprising 8m x 24m and at a height of 9m. o An 11kv transformer, which is situated behind a protective wall of 19m by 9m, and at a height of 9m. o An electrical switch-room of 8m by 10.5m, and 3.5 m high. o 5 no radiators which are 5m by 16m, and 4.5m high. o Water and oil tank (each being 3m by 5m, and 4m high); 3 m high open mesh steel panel security fence with double site access gates, covering a 315m perimeter. 2 no car parking spaces 3.3 The facility will have a direct connection into the local gas network. 3.4 The radiators are to be located along the eastern side of the development within the application site, and the engine hall on the western side, with the chimneys along the western edge of the engine hall. The electrical switch-room and transformer are proposed to be sited on the northern side of the application site, with car parking in the north-eastern corner. 3.5 Proposed lighting will comprise passive infrared sensor activated Light Emitting Diode (LED), and will be mounted on buildings at a height of 10m, to provide visibility for security and maintenance purposes. 3.6 The proposed development is to be managed remotely, and for the majority of the time, will be unmanned. Routine maintenance checks will however need to be undertaken intermittently. 3.7 The facility will be operated as a highly flexible ‘peaking plant’ to respond quickly to peaks in demand, and will be limited to operating 1,500 hours per year. 3.8 The facility will have an output of up to 50MW. 4. Assessment 4.1 The development does not fall within Schedule 1 of the Regulations. Page 3 of 75 PLANNING COMMITTEE th 6 September 2016 4.2 It is considered that the proposed development falls under Schedule 2, 3(a) which relates to ‘industrial installations for the production of electricity, steam and hot water’. The proposed development does exceed the relevant indicative threshold in column 2 of the table. The site area covered by the development is approximately 0.6ha; slightly larger than the 0.5ha threshold in the column 2. 4.3 Section 3 of the EIA Regulations contains the selection criteria for screening Schedule 2 development, which are grouped in to three main categories: 1) the characteristics of development; 2) the location of development; and 3) the characteristics of the potential impact. 4.4 With regard to category 1): the characteristics of the proposed development are not, in themselves, likely to give rise to any significant environmental effects because: o the proposed development in terms of its size in context with the existing industrial setting is relative and appropriate; o the cumulative impact of the proposed development together with the approved energy storage facility (B12/2016/0372) will not result in significant environmental effects; o the thermal output of the development does not exceed 50MW; o the use of natural resources, production of emissions, and nuisances, are not likely to be of a scale to generate significant environmental effects. 4.5 With regard to category 2) the location of the proposed development is not, in itself, particularly likely to give rise to significant environmental effects. The site itself is not in an environmentally sensitive geographic area (in terms of protected and designated areas), it is however within 150m of Morecambe Bay and Duddon Estuary potential Special Protection Area (pSPA), Morecambe Bay Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Morecambe Bay Ramsar Site. The site is also notified at a national level as South Walney & Piel Channel Flats SSSI. 4.6 The applicant has submitted a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening report which has confirmed that the proposed development would not result in significant effects on designated sites. Natural England is in agreement with the conclusions of the HRA. The proposed mitigation is sufficient and the continued management of the mitigation site would provide some benefits to the SPA featured species, as specific habitat would be provided and managed. 4.7 With regards to category 3) the characteristics of the potential impact of the proposed development are not, in themselves, particularly likely to give rise to signifcant environmental effects because: a) the extent of the potential effects of the development is important and signficant at a local scale.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 01 STA Cover 2007
    15-28 STA Listings 2007 21/2/07 2:37 PM Page 15 THE SOURCE TESTING ASSOCIATION THE STA MEMBERSHIP 3M UK Aerosol Industrial Station Road, Coleshill ALcontrol On-Site Services Ian Clarkson Research Group Birmingham B46 1JY Trevor Worrall 3M Centre, Cain Road, Bracknell Cristina Gutiérrez-Cañas T: 0800 917 1313 Templeborough House, Mill Close Berkshire RG12 8HT Maria Diaz de Haro 68 F: 01675 467022 Rotherham, South Yorkshire T: 01344 857801 Bajo Pab 3-4-5, Portugalete [email protected] S60 1BZ [email protected] Bizakaia 48920, Spain www.uk.airliquide.com T: 01709 841028 www.mmm.com T: (+34) 944 723597 F: 01709 841079 F: (+34) 944 723604 Air Monitors [email protected] A-Plus Consulting [email protected] James Mills www.alcontrol.co.uk Graham Clarke www.aerosolirg.com Unit 2, The Hawthorns 35 Holmesdale Road, Dronfield Pillows Green Road, Staunton Derbyshire S18 2FA AES Gloucestershire GL19 3NY T: 01246 410256 Mark Elliott T: 01452 849111 [email protected] Northumberland Dock Road F: 01452 849112 Wallsend, Tyne & Wear NE28 0QD [email protected] T: 0191 2968500 www.airmonitors.co.uk Anchem Laboratories F: 0191 2968560 Gethyn Jones [email protected] Air Products Unit 5a, Darcy Business Park www.aes-labs.co.uk Dr Gary Yates Darcy Way, Llandarcy, Neath 2 Millennium Gate, Westmere Drive SA10 6EJ ABB AES Kilroot Power Crewe, Cheshire CW1 6AP T: 01792 323223 John Kelly Stephen Fleming T: 01270 614227 F: 01792 323236 Hortonwood 37, Telford, Shropshire Larne Road, Carrickfergus F: 01932 258622 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Agecroft in Steam
    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Centrica Plc Corporate Responsibility Report 2008
    2008 Corporate responsibility report Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Contents 3 Chief Executive’s introduction 4 Assurance and scope 5 Excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s Assurance Statement 6 2008 Highlights 7 Business overview 8 Our approach 14 CR Committee and Governance 17 Business principles 22 Key Performance Indicators 25 Key impact areas 26 Climate change and the environment 44 Customer service 56 Securing future energy supplies 64 Health and safety 72 Employees 83 Supply chain 87 Local impact 92 Our stakeholders 94 Customers 97 Investors 99 Employees 101 Suppliers and business partners 103 Governments and regulators 105 Communities 107 NGOs and consumer organisations 109 Media 110 Trade unions 111 Appendix – Memberships 2 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Chief Executive’s introduction Introduction from Sam Laidlaw 2008 was my first full year as a member of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Throughout the year, the Committee challenged our current performance and debated areas of future activity across a range of critical business issues. Through this continual process of improvement, I have confidence that we are making good progress in developing the necessary structures and processes, allied to a management commitment that will build a sustainable and environmentally aware business for the future. In this report, you can read about our initiatives and performance over the year, as well as our forward- looking plans for 2009 and beyond. As our CR programmes mature, there is an increasing amount of available information to present to our internal and external audiences. As in previous years, we have chosen to use the online environment to report.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Response to the North West Coast Connections Route Corridor Consultation – Appendix 1
    PROPOSED RESPONSE TO THE NORTH WEST COAST CONNECTIONS ROUTE CORRIDOR CONSULTATION – APPENDIX 1 PURPOSE OF APPENDIX The purpose of this Appendix is to set out the proposed response of SLDC to the National Grid North West Coast Connections Route Corridor Consultation 1 General comments 1.1 SLDC broadly supports the preferred option – Onshore South with Tunnel. 1.2 The preferred option includes a tunnel under Morecambe Bay from close to Heysham to the Rampside area and then broadly follows the existing 132kV Electricity North West power line northwards through the Furness peninsula to Broughton in Furness and then up the West Coast of Cumbria, much of which will be removed and replaced by a smaller number of larger 400kV pylons. 1.3 The preferred option, in the main, avoids the significant impacts to South Lakeland communities that would be incurred if other alternative options, such as Onshore South, were implemented. 1.4 However, SLDC’s support for the preferred option is subject to consideration of the remaining concerns and needs for mitigation detailed below. 2 Section H1 (South eastern Furness) 2.1 The preferred tunnel route is proposed to surface slightly inland in the area between Roosebeck and Rampside. SLDC considers that locating the convertor stations at the points where the cable surfaces as close to the existing energy infrastructure at Roosecote Power Station as possible (as indicated by the larger blue hatched polygon in the consultation material) would indeed be preferable. It would have the least impact on social, environmental and economic factors, including landscape, impacts on local communities and tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosecote (Barrow)
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE 02 October 2012 A Report by the Assistant Director Planning and Sustainability _____________________________________________________________________________ Reference No: EN010044 Applicant: Centrica RPS Limited, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5GB District: Barrow Borough Council ______________________________________________________________________ Proposal: To consider a joint Cumbria County Council/Barrow Borough Council Local Impact Report relating to an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to enable the applicant to construct and operate a new Biomass electricity generating station with a nominal capacity of 90MW, together with a number of associated developments Location: Land at Roosecote, Barrow-in-Furness ______________________________________________________________________ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 To approve the joint Cumbria County Council/Barrow Borough Council prepared Local Impact Report, as set out in Annex A, and to refer it to Cabinet and for Cabinet to make representation about whether the Council supports the proposal or not, taking account the Local Impact Report agreed by DC&R. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On the 3 rd July 2012, Centrica RPS Limited submitted an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to the National Infrastructure Directorate (Planning Inspectorate) to build and operate a 90MW (gross)/80MW (Net) biomass electricity generating power station on land at Roosecote, Barrow-in-Furness. 2.2 As the biomass facility is an on-shore electricity generating station having a capacity of more than 50MW, it is deemed a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) within the definition contained in Sections 14 & 15 of the Planning Act 2008, as amended. The application for the DCO will therefore be determined by the Secretary of State, via the National Infrastructure Directorate (Planning Inspectorate).
    [Show full text]
  • Roosecote Biomass Report PDF 177 KB
    PART I South Lakeland District Council PLANNING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: 25 October 2012 Report Author: Mark Shipman (Development Management Group Manager) Eleanor Huddleston, Planning and Enforcement Assistant Portfolio: Jonathon Brook (Housing and Development Portfolio Holder) Report from: David Sykes (Director People and Places) Wards affected: All in the Furness Peninsula Key Decision: Not applicable A REPORT ON THE SUBMISSION OF A LOCAL IMPACT REPORT TO THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DIVISION REGARDING ROOSECOTE BIOMASS POWER STATION AT BARROW IN FURNESS 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 This report is presented to inform Members about the draft Local Impact Report to be submitted to the National Infrastructure Division of the Planning Inspectorate (NID) and allow Members to comment thereon. 1.2 Appendix 1 contains the Draft Report. 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 It is recommended that Members of Planning Committee:- (1) Consider the report and suggest any revisions they wish to be incorporated; and (2) Endorse the report for submission to the NID. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 The application seeks a Development Consent Order (DCO) to construct and operate a 90MW (gross) / 80MW (Net) biomass electricity generating power station on land at Roosecote, Barrow in Furness. 3.2 The main structures proposed comprise: a boiler house 70m high; a stack 90m high; a fuel storage shed 29m high, up to 120m x 55m in plan; four fuel storage silos for wood pellets each 25m in diameter and 35m tall; biomass screening building; road delivery unloading facility; rail unloading facility; a railway line connecting the existing rail infrastructure; and conveyors to transport fuel within the power station.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Corporate Responsibility Report
    2010 Corporate responsibility report Introduction and approach Contents 2 Chief Executive’s introduction 11 Governance 3 Approach and governance Centrica Executive Committee An Integrated business and CR strategy Corporate Responsibility Committee 4 Our CR strategy Performance 2010 Energy for a low carbon world 12 Looking ahead 8 Risk management 13 Assurance and reporting 9 Materiality 14 Scope of report 10 Stakeholder engagement Key stakeholder groups Prioritising stakeholders 2010 Corporate responsibility report: Introduction and approach 1 Chief Executive’s introduction In last year’s corporate responsibility (CR) report I discussed the changing shape of our business and how we responded by developing a new CR strategy. In 2010 we have focused on implementing that strategy and pursuing opportunities that lead the drive to a low carbon world. I am delighted to present our 2010 CR Report, which sets out our progress during the year and addresses some of the challenges that we face. Our new CR strategy has given us a better framework for our through energy efficiency and behaviour change, and on activities, with an emphasis on identifying ways in which providing additional support to our most vulnerable customers. Centrica can reduce carbon emissions. This is a role we are uniquely placed to fulfil through our customer relationships, the What is apparent is that we cannot achieve our low carbon skills of our service engineers and our expertise in sourcing goals in isolation. In September 2010, I set out what I believe energy and generating power. There are significant new market is needed from the industry, government and consumers to opportunities in helping to deliver a low carbon society; building achieve a low carbon economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Permits.Pdf
    Variation notice with introductory note Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2007 Roosecote Power Station Centrica RPS Limited Rampside Road Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria. LA13 0PQ Variation notice number EPR/BM4406IU/V002 Permit number EPR/BM4406IU Roosecote Power Station Permit Number EPR/BM4406IU Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the permit The following notice, which is issued pursuant to regulation 20 and Part 1 of Schedule 5 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations S.I.2007 No. 3538 (the Regulations), gives notice of the variation of an environmental permit to operate a regulated facility. The permit variation is that the installation boundary is to be amended to include the above ground installation (AGI). This is adjacent to the existing installation boundary and was previously considered to be part of the gas supply system operated by National Grid but responsibility for the AGI has now passed to Centrica. Schedule 1 of this notice lists any deleted conditions, Schedule 2 lists any amended conditions and Schedule 3 lists any conditions that have been added. The status log of a permit sets out the permitting history, including any changes to the permit reference number. Status Log of the permit Detail Date Response Date Application BM4406IU Duly made 29/03/2006 Additional Information Received 29/11/2006 Permit determined 19/12/2006 Variation EA/EPR/BM4406IU/V002 05/10/2009 Additional Information Received 07/10/2009 16/10/2009 Variation EPR/BM4406IU/V002 determined 20/10/2009 End of Introductory Note Variation number EPR/BM4406IU/V002 Page 1 - - - 1 - - 1 -1 Notice of variation Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 Permit number EPR/BM4406IU The Environment Agency in exercise of its powers under Regulation 20 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 (SI 2000 No 3538) varies the permit as set out below.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Options Report for the North West Region Oct 2012
    North West Coast Connections Project Strategic Options Report for the North West Region 19 October 2012 Issue 2, version 0.00 National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 2 Background ........................................................................................... 5 3 The Need for Reinforcement in the North West Region ................................ 9 4 New Transmission Routes - National Grid’s Approach ................................ 15 5 Strategic Options Identified for the North West Region ............................. 21 6 Appraisal of Strategic Option 1: Twin South Onshore ................................ 26 7 Appraisal of Strategic Option 2: Twin South Offshore................................ 42 8 Appraisal of Strategic Option 3: Cumbria Ring Onshore South ................... 54 9 Appraisal of Strategic Option 4: Cumbria Ring Offshore South ................... 71 10 Appraisal of Strategic Option 5: Twin North + North-South .................... 87 11 Appraisal of Strategic Option 6: Twin North + East-West ..................... 104 12 Integrated Offshore Alternative ........................................................ 120 13 Results of Initial Comparative Appraisal of Strategic Options ................ 123 14 Conclusions ................................................................................... 140 Appendix A – Summary of National Grid’s
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Tony Jarvis
    Mr Tony Jarvis - Head of Thermal Power Our ref: NO/2012/103343/01-L01 Projects Your ref: 111108 Centrica Plc Millstream Maidenhead Road Date: 29 March 2012 Windsor Berkshire SL4 5GD Dear Mr Jarvis ROOSECOTE BIOMASS POWER STATION, SECTION 42 CONSULTATION ROOSECOTE POWER STATION IN BARROW IN FURNESS Thank you for referring the Section 43 Consultation on the above proposals, which we received on the 16 February 2012. We have the following comments to make. Flood Risk There are areas within the application site such as parts of the rail link which are located within the indicative tidal flood plain, the area of which is based on the approximate extent of floods with a 0.5% annual probability of occurrence. Hydrology and Flood Risk has been covered within the Preliminary Environmental Information (Ref OXF7339) dated February 2012. We recommend that the sequential approach be undertaken, where practicable, within an application boundary. This ensures that the more vulnerable parts of a development are sited in areas at least flood risk. It is understood that this approach is being used within the site for example with the fuel handling facilities which are located in flood zone 1. Section 7.7.2 states that the rail route is typically between 6.3 and 6.5m AOD. Section 7.9.8 states that the proposed rail route would be flooded to a depth of around 100mm during a 1 in 200 year event based on tidal data provided. However this does not appear to include an allowance for climate change and freeboard. The applicant should be aware that the tidal levels that we provide are based on astronomical tides approximately 2km off the coastline and do not take into account wave action / tidal surge.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to David Cameron MP
    Leader of the Council The Courts English Street CARLISLE Cumbria CA3 8NA Fax 01228 607403 Tel 01228 227394 Email [email protected] Our Ref: ETM/KCS Date: 5th October 2010 The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Prime Minister House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Dear As the Conservative Leader of Cumbria County Council, I appreciate and endorse the actions that the coalition government must take to reduce the national deficit. It is also entirely apposite to undertake a comprehensive defence review and that you consider such matters in the light of the overall UK budget and the UK’s defence commitments both at home and abroad. I am also aware that you appreciate how important both submarine and surface vessel building is to Barrow, to south Cumbria and, indeed, to the defence of the nation. County Councillors from across Cumbria, and of all political persuasions, have unanimously agreed to give full support to plans to secure a prosperous future for Barrow and the Furness area. Barrow has suffered in the past because of its comparative isolation. It is ironic, perhaps, that cutting-edge manufacturing and the latest forms of energy are underpinning the modest turnaround in the area’s fortunes; this marks Barrow out from other regenerating towns that have relied on financial services and the retail sector to underpin their economies. Barrow shipyard is one of the largest in the United Kingdom (having constructed well over 800 vessels in its history). The port of Barrow itself is heavily involved with the transportation of natural gases and other forms of energy from local sites such as Sellafield, Barrow Offshore Windfarm, Ormonde Wind Farm, Rampside Gas Terminal and Roosecote Power Station.
    [Show full text]