DOCSLIB.ORG

Sensory to Motor Information Processing in the Grasshopper Brain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sensory to Motor Information Processing in the Grasshopper Brain FROM HEARING TO SINGING: SENSORY TO MOTOR INFORMATION PROCESSING IN THE GRASSHOPPER BRAIN Dissertation for the award of the degree “Doctor rerum naturalium” of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen within the doctoral program "Systems Neuroscience (CSN)" of the Georg-August-University School of Science (GAUSS) submitted by Mit Balvantray Bhavsar from Ahmedabad, India Göttingen 2016 Thesis committee Prof.Dr. Andreas Stumpner Dept. Cellular neurobiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen Prof.Dr. Ralf Heinrich Dept. Cellular neurobiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen Prof.Dr. Hansjörg Scherberger The Neurobiology Laboratory, German Primate Center (DPZ), Göttingen Members of the examination board 1st supervisor and reviewer: Prof.Dr. Andreas Stumpner Dept. Cellular neurobiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen 2nd supervisor and reviewer: Prof.Dr. Ralf Heinrich Dept. Cellular neurobiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen Further members of the examination board Prof.Dr. Hansjörg Scherberger The Neurobiology Laboratory, German Primate Center (DPZ), Göttingen Prof.Dr. Henrik Bringmann Sleep and walking Laboratory, Max plank institute for biophysical chemistry, Göttingen Prof.Dr. Tim Göllisch Dept. of Ophthalmology, University medical center, Göttingen Prof.Dr. Gregor Bucher Dept. of Developmental Biology, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute, Göttingen Date of oral examination: 13 May, 2016 I Declaration of academic honesty I herewith declare that the Ph.D. thesis entitled “From hearing to singing: sensory to motor information processing in the grasshopper brain” has been written independently and with no other sources and aids than quoted. Mit Balvantray Bhavsar Göttingen, February 2016 II To my parents…… III Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………XI Chapter 1 General Introduction……………………………………………………………..1 1.1 Communication and its sensory aspects ............................................................................... 2 1.2 Acoustic communication in insects ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Grasshoppers Chorthippus biguttulus as a model system .................................................... 3 1.4 Neuronal basis of hearing in grasshoppers ........................................................................... 4 1.5 Goal of the project ............................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Terminology to describe a grasshopper song ...................................................................... 7 1.7 Thesis outline ....................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 Multielectrode recordings from auditory neurons in the brain of a small grasshopper .......................................................................................................... 10 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Animals………………………………………………………………………....13 2.2.2 Animal preparation…….……………...……………………………………..….13 2.2.3 Multielectrode design and setup………………………………………...………13 2.2.4 Acoustic stimulation…………………………………………………………….14 2.2.5 Marking the recording locations………………………..……….………..…….15 2.2.6 Offline spike sorting….…………………………………..…………………….16 2.2.7 Collision analysis…..…………………………………..……………………….17 2.2.8 Constancy of recording conditions...……………………………...…………….18 2.2.9 Unit identification…………………………………………...………………….18 2.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.3.1 Marking the recording locations……………………..……...………………….19 IV 2.3.2 Comparison between copper and tungsten wire recordings……..……………..20 2.3.3 Spike sorting…………………….……………………….……….….………….21 2.3.4 Collision analysis.........................................................................................…....23 2.3.5 Constancy of recording conditions….………………………….……………….24 2.3.6 Auditory units………………………….…………………….………………….25 2.3.7 Intensity response functions and unit identification………..……………..…….26 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 30 2.4.1 Productions of multielectrodes...………………………...……..……………….30 2.4.2 Marking the recording locations………………………….…………....……….31 2.4.3 Constancy of recording conditions….………………………..………...………31 2.4.4 Spike sorting and collision analysis……….…………………...….……………32 2.4.5 Unit identification………………………..…..............................................…....33 2.4.6 Multielectrode recordings and song recognition in grasshoppers……..………..35 Chapter 3 Population coding among ascending neurons in the brain of a small grasshopper ........................................................................................................... 37 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 38 3.2 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................... 40 3.2.1 Animals……………….………………………………………………………...40 3.2.2 Animal preparation…….……………...………………………………..……….40 3.2.3 Acoustic stimulation…………………………………………….………...…….40 3.2.4 Offline spike sorting and collision analysis...………………….……..…..…….42 3.2.5 Data analysis………….……………………………………………..………….42 3.2.6 Decoding using confusion matrix………………………………….…..……….43 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 46 3.3.1 Unit identification……….………………………………………..…………….46 3.3.2 PCA based classification of ascending neurons…………...…………..…….….57 3.3.3 Summed activity for syllable-pause patterns…...………………….………..….58 3.3.4 Summed activity for syllable-gap patterns.…………….…………….…………67 V 3.3.5 Decoding the stimulus identity from the response………………………..…….70 3.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 77 3.4.1 Problems in unit identification……….…………………….…………..……….77 3.4.2 Population response of ascending neurons…………...………..........……….….78 3.5 Outlook……………………………………………………………………………………81 Chapter 4 Recordings and electrical stimulation of local auditory neurons in the brain of a small grasshopper…………………………………………………………………………85 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 83 4.2 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................... 84 4.2.1 Animals………………….………………………………………………..…….84 4.2.2 Animal preparation…….……………...………………………………………...84 4.2.3 Acoustic stimulation……………………………………………….…...……….84 4.2.4 Electrical stimulation…………………….....…………………………..……….86 4.2.5 Marking the recording/stimulation sites...……………………………….…..….86 4.2.6 Offline spike sorting…………….…………………..……………….………….87 4.2.7 Syllable-pause and gap tuning………….……………...…………….………….88 4.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 88 4.3.1 Latency criteria……….……………………………………….………………...88 4.3.2 LBNs recorded in lateral protocerebrum and their locations...…………..….….90 4.3.3 LBNs recorded in anterior protocerebrum and their locations …………...…….97 4.3.4 LBN showing selectivity……...…..…………….………………...……..…….104 4.3.5 LBNs recorded in central complex and their locations ……….………………107 4.3.6 Electrical stimulation of the auditory neuropile ......………………….…….…113 4.3.7 Female Ch.biguttulus song structure…………………………………...……...114 4.3.8 Differences in singing while stimulating different sites……………………….116 4.3.9 Locations of the stimulation sites……………………. ……………………….117 4.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 118 4.4.1 Recording auditory activity in the brain of a grasshopper…………………….118 VI 4.4.2 LBN recorded in lateral protocerebrum and central complex….….….……….118 4.4.3 LBN showing selective response……….……...…..…………….........………119 4.4.4 Electrical stimulation of auditory neuropile………..…………….........………120 4.5 Outlook ............................................................................................................................. 121 Chapter 5 General Discussion on method .......................................................................... 122 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 123 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 124 5.2 Type of material used for production of multielectrodes………………….…………….125 5.3 Number of neurons that can be recorded using multielectrodes ...................................... 127 5.4 Methods to mark the location of the recording ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers
    The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers Dissertation To Fulfil the Requirements for the Degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” (PhD) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, Abhijeet Shah born on 7th November 1984, Hyderabad, India 1 Academic reviewers: 1. Prof. Holger Schielzeth, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 2. Prof. Manja Marz, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 3. Prof. Rolf Beutel, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 4. Prof. Frieder Mayer, Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin 5. Prof. Steve Hoffmann, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena 6. Prof. Aletta Bonn, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Date of oral defense: 24.02.2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 5 Zusammenfassung............................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Genetic polymorphism ............................................................................................................. 9 Lewontin’s paradox ....................................................................................................................................... 9 The evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Earctic G Rassland S
    Issue 46 (July 2020) ISSN 2627-9827 - DOI 10.21570/EDGG.PG.46 Journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group Dry Grassland of the Eurasian Journal PALAEARCTIC GRASSLANDS PALAEARCTIC 2 Palaearctic Grasslands 46 ( J u ly 20 2 0) Table of Contents Palaearctic Grasslands ISSN 2627-9827 DOI 10.21570/EDGG.PG46 Palaearctic Grasslands, formerly published under the names Bulletin of the European Editorial 3 Dry Grassland Group (Issues 1-26) and Bulletin of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (Issues 27-36) is the journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG). It usually appears in four issues per year. Palaearctic Grasslands publishes news and announce- ments of EDGG, its projects, related organisations and its members. At the same time it serves as outlet for scientific articles and photo contributions. News 4 Palaearctic Grasslands is sent to all EDGG members and, together with all previous issues, it is also freely available at http://edgg.org/publications/bulletin. All content (text, photos, figures) in Palaearctic Grasslands is open access and available under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 that allow to re-use it provided EDGG Publications 8 proper attribution is made to the originators ("BY") and the new item is licensed in the same way ("SA" = "share alike"). Scientific articles (Research Articles, Reviews, Forum Articles, Scientific Reports) should be submitted to Jürgen Dengler ([email protected]), following the Au- Aleksanyan et al.: Biodiversity of 12 thor Guidelines updated in Palaearctic Grasslands 45: 4. They are subject to editorial dry grasslands in Armenia: First review, with one member of the Editorial Board serving as Scientific Editor and deciding results from the 13th EDGG Field about acceptance, necessary revisions or rejection.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory Interneurones in the Metathoracic Ganglion of the Grasshopper Chorthippus Biguttulus H
    /. exp. Biol. 158, 411-430 (1991) 411 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1991 AUDITORY INTERNEURONES IN THE METATHORACIC GANGLION OF THE GRASSHOPPER CHORTHIPPUS BIGUTTULUS H. PROCESSING OF TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF THE SONG OF THE MALE BY ANDREAS STUMPNER*, BERNHARD RONACHER AND OTTO VON HELVERSEN Institut fur Zoologie II, Staudtstrasse 5, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany Accepted 25 March 1991 Summary 1. Auditory interneurones originating in the metathoracic ganglion of females of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus were investigated with respect to their processing of models of the male's song. In these models two temporal configurations were varied: (i) the song pattern, consisting of 'syllables' and 'pauses', and (ii) the duration of short gaps within syllables. 2. A precise encoding of the song pattern is found only among receptors and 'thoracic' neurones (SN1, TNI), but not among ascending neurones. The only ascending neurone that reacts tonically at all intensities (AN6) encodes the song pattern much less precisely than do receptors. Other ascending neurones (AN3, AN11) encode the gross pattern of model songs, but only at low intensities. 3. One spontaneously active 'local' neurone (SN6) is tonically inhibited and encodes the pauses of a model song. A similar response, however, is not found in three ascending neurones (AN13, AN14, AN15), which are merely inhibited. 4. Among ascending neurones, AN12 is the most reliably influenced by the syllable-pause structure of the songs. Its phasic burst marks the onset of every syllable in a behaviourally attractive song. Its activity could account for the rising part of the corresponding behavioural response curve.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 1–21 BIOLOGIE Analysis of The
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Articulata - Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V. DGfO Jahr/Year: 2010 Band/Volume: 25_2010 Autor(en)/Author(s): Berger Dirk, Gottsberger Brigitte Artikel/Article: Analysis of the courtship of Myrmeleotettix antennatus (Fieber, 1853) - with general remarks on multimodal courtship behaviour in gomphocerine grasshoppers 1-21 Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/ ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 1௅21 BIOLOGIE Analysis of the courtship of Myrmeleotettix antennatus (Fieber, 1853) – with general remarks on multimodal courtship behaviour in gomphocerine grasshoppers Dirk Berger & Brigitte Gottsberger Abstract Gomphocerine grasshoppers are known to produce species-specific songs by a femoral-tegminal mechanism. Male songs are considered to play a crucial role as interspecific hybridization barrier between species since male songs are discri- minated by conspecific females according to their preferences towards distinct song structures and temporal patterns. During own comprehensive studies about grasshopper songs it became evident that calling and courtship songs play dif- ferent roles in the mating systems in different grasshopper species. Whereas in many species calling and courtship songs resemble each other widely (e.g. most Chorthippus species), in others highly complex courtship songs evolved contain- ing acoustical and visual elements. That leads to the assumption that different mating systems within Gomphocerinae and even more in caeliferan grasshop- pers exist. About the diversity of mating systems in short horned grasshoppers not much is known yet. In this study we describe the multimodal courtship behav- iour of Myrmeleotettix antennatus. The courtship repertoire contains three acous- tical elements and three visual displays in which the antennae, the palps and the body are involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Crickets, Crickets and Grasshoppers from Moldavia
    -,3$2#$,-0%3 *#,3*'-0%3 Bushcrickets,CricketsandGrasshoppersfrom Moldavia(Romania) S S -,3$2#$,-0%3 *#,3*'-0%3 Bushcrickets,Cricketsand GrasshoppersfromMoldavia (Romania) PIM Iasi,2008 T SCIENTIFICREFERENTS: Dr.KlausGerhardHeller, “0'#"0'!&V*#6,"#0c,'4#01'27Q,12'232#-$"--*-%7Q0*,%#,Q##0+,7 Prof.Dr.GheorgheMusta, b*TT'38c,'4#01'27Q!3*27-$)'-*-%7Q1'Q*-+,' Prof.Dr.IonelAndriescu, b*TT'38c,'4#01'27Q!3*27-$)'-*-%7Q1'Q*-+,' +&-2-1S-,3$2#$,-0%3 -#62S-,3$2#$,-0%3Q*#,3*'-0%3 ,%*'1&20,1*2'-,S*#,3*'-0%3Q-,3$2#$,-0%3Q-,-0%3 )--)!-4#0S*#,3*'-0%3Q/3!',313 )--)!-4#0SS'#&*30-3,2',--!+#),"Barbitistesconstrictus )--)!-4#0TS34'"_15**#7 )--).0',2#"5'2&$3,"1$0-+#0,2+893+,*#1-30!#1Q-3VTUY TRRY U Preface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
    [Show full text]
  • Articulata 2004 Xx(X)
    © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/; www.zobodat.at ARTICULATA 2015 30: 81–90 FAUNISTIK Chorthippus bornhalmi in the heart of the Balkans (Acrididae: Gomphocerinae) Josip Skejo & Slobodan Ivković Abstract New records of Chorthippus bornhalmi in the Balkans are presented. The grass- hopper is reported from 7 localities from the protected landscape of Vlasina in SE Serbia, representing the first records for Serbia. The new records of the species are discussed and bioacoustical information and general distribution is present- ed. Zusammenfassung Es werden neue Funde von Chorthippus bornhalmi auf dem Balkan gemeldet. Die Art wurde an sieben Stellen im montanen Schutzgebiet Vlasina im Südosten Serbiens gefunden, was gleichzeitig Erstnachweis für Serbien ist. Neben der Darstellung der Neufunde werden Informationen zur Stridulation und zur Ge- samtverbreitung der Art gegeben. Rezume Predstavljeni su novi nalazi vrste Chorthippus bornhalmi na Balkanu. Vrsta je nađena na 7 lokaliteta u predelu izuzetnih odlika Vlasina (JI Srbija). Raspravljeni su novi nalazi vrste te su predstavljeni bioakustički podatci i opšta rasprostranje- nost vrste. Ovo su prvi nalazi ove vrste za srpsku faunu. Introduction Balkan grasshopper (Chorthippus bornhalmi) (Caelifera: Acrididae: Gomphoceri- nae: Gomphocerini) is a grasshopper species described by HARZ in 1971 from the Dubrovnik area in S Croatia as a cryptic species very similar to Chorthippus brunneus (Thunberg, 1815). In the Balkans the only difference in morphology between these two species is the number of stridulatory pegs in the male (> 100 in Ch. bornhalmi; < 90 in Ch. brunneus) (e.g. HARZ 1975, WILLEMSE et al. 2009). Both species are part of the Chorthippus biguttulus group (hereafter abbreviated to biguttulus group), that currently counts 25 taxa, 12 species, and 13 subspecies (ŞIRIN et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Isolation and Chemical Communication in Grasshoppers
    Reproductive isolation and chemical communication in grasshoppers DISSERTATION Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie eingereicht an der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Dipl.-Biol. Jonas Finck Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekan der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät Prof. Dr. Richard Lucius Gutachter/ -innen: 1. Prof. Dr. Bernhard Ronacher 2. Prof. Dr. Heinrich Ralf 3. Prof. Dr. Heiner Römer Eingereicht am: 19.04.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 27.06.2016 Abstract The formation and maintenance of species in nature is accompanied by the evolution of reproductive isolating mechanisms. The identification and quan- tification of these reproductive isolation barriers is crucial to understand pat- terns of speciation and coexistence. In this thesis, I first conducted several experiments to identify and quantify reproductive isolation at multiple stag- es in the life history of the closely related species Chorthippus biguttulus and C. mollis (chapter 2). My results indicated a crucial role of chemical cues in the maintenance of species isolation. I combined multiple approaches to ex- amine the ultimate and proximate causes of chemical cues on reproductive behavior in these species. In chapter 3, I demonstrated that the cuticular hy- drocarbon (CHC) profiles of C. biguttulus and C. mollis provide species- and sex-specific cues. I used a RNA-seq approach to examine transcriptional dif- ferences of candidate genes, which might cause the divergence in CHC pro- files between species and sex. One candidate gene showed species-specific transcriptional differences and may contribute to reproductive isolation. In addition, four candidate genes were differentially expressed between the sexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chorthippus Dorsatus
    Heredity (2021) 127:66–78 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-021-00433-w ARTICLE Simple inheritance of color and pattern polymorphism in the steppe grasshopper Chorthippus dorsatus 1 1,2 1 Gabe Winter ● Mahendra Varma ● Holger Schielzeth Received: 25 January 2021 / Revised: 31 March 2021 / Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published online: 16 April 2021 © The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access Abstract The green–brown polymorphism of grasshoppers and bush-crickets represents one of the most penetrant polymorphisms in any group of organisms. This poses the question of why the polymorphism is shared across species and how it is maintained. There is mixed evidence for whether and in which species it is environmentally or genetically determined in Orthoptera. We report breeding experiments with the steppe grasshopper Chorthippus dorsatus, a polymorphic species for the presence and distribution of green body parts. Morph ratios did not differ between sexes, and we find no evidence that the rearing environment (crowding and habitat complexity) affected the polymorphism. However, we find strong evidence for genetic determination for the presence/absence of green and its distribution. Results are most parsimoniously explained by three fl 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: autosomal loci with two alleles each and simple dominance effects: one locus in uencing the ability to show green color, with a dominant allele for green; a locus with a recessive allele suppressing green on the dorsal side; and a locus with a recessive allele suppressing green on the lateral side. Our results contribute to the emerging contrast between the simple genetic inheritance of green–brown polymorphisms in the subfamily Gomphocerinae and environmental determination in other subfamilies of grasshoppers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioacoustica : a Free and Open Repository and Analysis Platform for Bioacoustics
    This is a repository copy of BioAcoustica : a free and open repository and analysis platform for bioacoustics. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86904/ Version: Published Version Article: Baker, Edward, Price, Ben W., Rycroft, S.D. et al. (2 more authors) (2015) BioAcoustica : a free and open repository and analysis platform for bioacoustics. Database. bav054. ISSN 1758-0463 https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav054 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Database, 2015, 1–10 doi: 10.1093/database/bav054 Original article Original article BioAcoustica: a free and open repository and analysis platform for bioacoustics Edward Baker1,*, Ben W. Price1,S.D.Rycroft1, Jon Hill2 and Vincent S. Smith1 1Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK and 2 Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK Downloaded from *Corresponding author: Tel: þ44(0)2079425975; Email: [email protected] Citation details: Baker,E., Price,B.W., Rycroft,S.D., et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 International Congress of Orthopterology
    10th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ORTHOPTEROLOGY 21-25 June 2009 Antalya, TURKEY Presented by the Orthopterists’ Society and Akdeniz University 10th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ORTHOPTEROLOGY 21-25 June 2009 Antalya, TURKEY 10th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ORTHOPTEROLOGY 21-25 June 2009 Antalya, TURKEY Presented by the Orthopterists’ Society and Akdeniz University 1 10th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ORTHOPTEROLOGY 21-25 June 2009 Antalya, TURKEY CONTENTS Contents ................................................................................................................................ 2 Committees ........................................................................................................................... 3 Congress Programme (SUNDAY- JUNE 21, 2009)........................................................... 4 Congress Programme (MONDAY- JUNE 22, 2009)......................................................... 4 Congress Programme (TUESDAY- JUNE 23, 2009) ........................................................ 5 Congress Programme (WEDNESDAY- JUNE 24, 2009) ................................................. 9 Congress Programme (THURSDAY- JUNE 25, 2009)................................................... 13 Abstract Contents............................................................................................................... 19 Abstracts ............................................................................................................................. 36 Contact Information of all the Participants .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Hybridization Between the Grasshoppers Chorthippus Biguttulus and C
    Interspecific hybridization between the grasshoppers Chorthippus biguttulus and C. brunneus (Acrididae; Gomphocerinae) Den Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades im Jahre 2007 vorgelegt von Brigitte Gottsberger aus Botucatu, Brasilien Als Dissertation genehmigt von den Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 11.01.2008 Vorsitzender der Promotionskommission: Prof. Dr. E. Bänsch Erstberichterstatter: PD Dr. F. Mayer Zweitberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. B. Ronacher Contents CONTENTS Zusammenfassung.......................................................................................................... 5 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1............................................................................................... 13 Behavioral sterility of hybrid males in acoustically communicating grasshoppers (Acrididae, Gomphocerinae) 1Abstract.............................................................................................................. 13 2Introduction...................................................................................................... 14 3Materialsandmethods......................................................................................16 3.1.Animalsandcrossingexperiments...............................................................16 3.2.Songrecordings...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Geography, Climate and Sexual Selection in Driving Divergence Among Insect Populations in Mountaintops
    The roles of geography, climate and sexual selection in driving divergence among insect populations in mountaintops Joaquina Pato*, Juan Carlos Illera, José Ramón Obeso, Paola Laiolo Research Unit of Biodiversity (UO, CSIC, PA), Oviedo University, 33600 Mieres, Spain *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Running title: Geographic variation in mountaintops Acknowledgments We are grateful to M. Brunetti, A. Segura and L. Viesca for field and laboratory assistance, and to Sarah Young for editing the language. We also thank Picos de Europa National Park and Consejería de Medio Ambiente del Principado de Asturias for providing permissions to collect grasshoppers in protected areas. We thank three anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by grant 4278 of the British Ecological Society, grants CGL2011-28177, CGL2014-53899-P and CGL2017-85191-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness and grant LIQUENES 2014 from FICYT and edp-HC Energía. 1 1 Abstract 2 Aim: Analysing the drivers of intraspecific variation and how reproductive barriers arise is an 3 essential step to infer the mechanisms of biogeographic differentiation. In populations of a 4 specialized alpine species, we explore the role of geography and climate in the divergence of 5 genetic, morphological and acoustic characters, and analyse the functional consequences of 6 variation on mate choice. 7 Taxon: Chorthippus cazurroi (Orthoptera: Caelifera, Acrididae, Gomphocerinae) 8 Location: The entire distribution of the species (23 populations from six massifs of the 9 Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain) 10 Methods: First, we analysed the extent of intraspecific spatial divergence and the covariation 11 among climatic niche, genetic (mtDNA), acoustic (song structure) and morphological (body- 12 size) traits.
    [Show full text]