DOCSLIB.ORG

Bush Crickets, Crickets and Grasshoppers from Moldavia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bush Crickets, Crickets and Grasshoppers from Moldavia -,3$2#$,-0%3 *#,3*'-0%3 Bushcrickets,CricketsandGrasshoppersfrom Moldavia(Romania) S S -,3$2#$,-0%3 *#,3*'-0%3 Bushcrickets,Cricketsand GrasshoppersfromMoldavia (Romania) PIM Iasi,2008 T SCIENTIFICREFERENTS: Dr.KlausGerhardHeller, “0'#"0'!&V*#6,"#0c,'4#01'27Q,12'232#-$"--*-%7Q0*,%#,Q##0+,7 Prof.Dr.GheorgheMusta, b*TT'38c,'4#01'27Q!3*27-$)'-*-%7Q1'Q*-+,' Prof.Dr.IonelAndriescu, b*TT'38c,'4#01'27Q!3*27-$)'-*-%7Q1'Q*-+,' +&-2-1S-,3$2#$,-0%3 -#62S-,3$2#$,-0%3Q*#,3*'-0%3 ,%*'1&20,1*2'-,S*#,3*'-0%3Q-,3$2#$,-0%3Q-,-0%3 )--)!-4#0S*#,3*'-0%3Q/3!',313 )--)!-4#0SS'#&*30-3,2',--!+#),"Barbitistesconstrictus )--)!-4#0TS34'"_15**#7 )--).0',2#"5'2&$3,"1$0-+#0,2+893+,*#1-30!#1Q-3VTUY TRRY U Preface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rof.Dr.IonelAndriescu S Summary ,20-"3!2'-, S 0-*"4'S%#-%0.&'!*!&0!2#0'82'-, V =02&-.2#0+-0.&-*-%7 X *#.0-"3!2'-,,""#4#*-.+#,2 SR ?20'"3*2'-, ST !-*-%7 SW -&#!-**#!2',%Q!.2'4'27 0#"',%Q.&-2-%0.&7," !-312'!0#%'1202'-, SZ ?712#+2'!*'12-$2&#=02&-.2#0$0-+0-*"4' TR G#72-2&#0-*"4',=02&-.2#0 TW -&#=02&-.2#01.#!'#1$0-+0-*"4' WW ,1'$#0 WW '#*'$#0 SWY =2&#0.-11' *#1.#!'#1 TZV !),-5*#"%#+#,21 TZZ ?#*#!2'4# ' *'-%0.&7 TZ[ 1 INTRODUCTION /2#12123"'#10#4#*2&22&#',1#!21%- #7-,"UW+'**'-,1.#!'#1Q #',% 2&# +-12 ,3+#0-31 %0-3. ', 2&# ,'+* 5-0*"T -&#7 ',& '2 ** #,4'0-,+#,21S 2#00#120'*Q /32'!Q #0'*Q $0-+ 2&# 8-02& +-*# 2- 2&# /32-0Q$0-+2&#1#1&-0#2-2&#+-3,2',!*'$$1T,'+*15'2&*0%# ,3+ #0-$1.#!'#1Q2&#',1#!210#.0#1#,2,'+.-02,2$!2-0',2&# #!-,-+7-$,230#,"',2&#&3+, #',%_1*'$#T-&#0#+0) *#40'#27 -$2&#',1#!21,"2&#'0'+.-02,!#2-2&# '-1.&#0#Q,"%#,#0**7*1-$-0 2&# &3+,1Q &1 #1.#!'**7 5)#, 2&# ',2#0#12 2- 123"7 2&#+ ," 2&# #,2-+-*-%7+"#20#+#,"-31 0#)2&0-3%&T )#!31# -$ %#,#0**7 #',% +#"'3+ 2- *0%# 1'8# ',1#!21Q 2&# =02&-.2#0&4#"05,',2&#&3+,_122#,2'-,$-0+,77#01%-T-&# +'%02'-,-$1-+#1.#!'#1 0-3%&23.-,2&#+2&#"+-,'1&+#,2-$2&# $0+#01T , 1-+# ,!'#,2 %7.2', .',2',%1 2&# 0'%02-07 #011&-..#0 0#4#075#**0#.0#1#,2#"T -&# G27"'"1Q )31&V!0'!)#21Q '0'!)#21Q #011&-..#01 ," /-!3121 #*-,% 2- 2&# -0"#0 =02&-.2#0Q 2&# G27"'"1Q 2&# )31&V!0'!)#21Q 2&# '0'!)#21,"2&#0-*#V'0'!)#21 #*-,%',%2-2&#13 -0"#0,1'$#0,"2&# #011&-..#01,"/-!31212-2&#13 -0"#0'#*'$#0T-&'1!*11'$'!2'-,-$ 2&#1#',1#!21-$$#0140'-31.-11' '*'2'#1-$0#1#0!&T-&##* -02#"123"7 -$ 2&#'0 120'"3*2'-,1 0#.0#1#,21 -,# -$ 2&# +-12 !-+.#**',% 1.#!21 -$ #2&-*-%7,"*1-2&#123"7-$2&#'0%#-%0.&'!*"'1.#01'-,*#"2-+,7 2&#-0'#1',8--%#-%0.&7T,2&#1+#2'+#Q2&#=02&-.2#00#1-+#-$ 2&#+-12'+.-02,2 '-',"'!2-01$-02&#,230*& '221',2#%0'27122#Q 11-!'2'-,1 -$ =02&-.2#0 $0-+ "'$$#0#,2 1'2#1 .0-4'"',% 31 #6!2 "2#1 -322&#!-,"'2'-,1,"2&#1'232'-,-$2&-1#& '221T -&# =02&-.2#0Q "3# 2- 1-+# 1.#!'#1 .2#0'1+ 1 5#** 1 2- 2&#'0 1#,1'2'4'27 2- 2&# 40'2'-,1 -$ 2&# #,4'0-,+#,2_1 !-,"'2'-,1Q .0#1#,2 *0%#,3+ #0-$#,"#+'2#1*')#,2-2&#2-2*,3+ #0-$1.#!'#1T -&# =02&-.2#0 $3, $0-+ *-+,' '1 5#** ),-5, "3# 2- 2&# 40'-31 0#1#0!&#1 +"# ', 2&'1 "-+',T '0* 311 '1 2&# $'012 -,# 2- .3 *'1& "2 !-,1'"#0',% 2&# =02&-.2#0 $0-+ -30 !-3,207T 9# +#,2'-,1 UV1.#!'#1$0-+2&#1300-3,"',%1-$?' '3',SZWUQSZWW,"SZX[T,2&# +-,-%0.&7 b+0-"0-+31 "#0 30-.'1!&# =02&-.2#0#,cQ )03,,#0 4-, I22#,57* "#1!0' #1 1-+# 1.#!'#1 $0-+ 3- 0-%# SZZTT 030'!# J!/3#2 +)#1 '+.-02,2 !-**#!2'-,1 ," 2&# +2#0'* '1 .3 *'1&#" ', V ..#0150'22#, 70T0#7V##11,#0SZ[YQSZ[[QS[RRQ,"S[RUT,SZ[[Q 3#?31130#"#1!0' #1,#51.#!'#1QIsophyahospodarQ$0-+2&#+2#0'* !-**#!2#",#00,%*'/)# 70TJ!/3#2T0*!-*+)300Q'"#" 7 S 0-,2"-,_1+2#0'*1Q.3 *'1&#1T$3,'12'!*'121',SZ[Z,"SZ[[5'2&YY 1.#!'#1-$=02&-.2#0T0-,2"-,,*71#12&#Locustamigratoria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rachnocephalus vestitusT 'T 0],"03 ," T ';0"#'Q',S[WVQ.3 *'1&$3,'12'!*'12$2#0123"7',%2&#=02&-.2#0$0-+ 0-*"4'V2&#1.#!'#1Bryodemellatuberculatum,"Paracinematricolor #',% ,#5 $',"',%1 $-0 *-+,'T 'T 0],"03 123"'#1 2&# =02&-.2#0 $0-+ '#&*3 0-3,2', ," 2&# )'!8 #-0%#1 S[WX ," .3 *'1&#1 123"7 -322&#=02&-.2#0$0-+0-*"4'',S[WZT,S[W[&#123"'#12&#)31&V !0'!)#21$0-+0-*"4',"&#+)#1*'125'2&TU1.#!'#1T-&#84-03* 03,2#*3'/)#_11300-3,"',%10#',4#12'%2#"',S[XS,"VY1.#!'#1-$ =02&-.2#0&4# ##,$-3,"T,S[XYQ2-%#2&#05'2&)#*G'1Q&#123"'#1 2&#)31&V!0'!)#21$0-+"'$$#0#,20#1',0-*"4'T,b3,'12'!1.#!21 $0-+ 2&# =0'#,2* '0.2&',1c S[Y[ -,# !, $'," *'12 5'2& 2&# =02&-.2#0$0-+2&#=0'#,2*'0.2&',1T=,#-$'-,12,2',0],"03_1*12 ..#01 #,3+#02#1 WT 1.#!'#1 $0-+ 2&# ',2#0#12',% *#1#042'-, 34'"_1 5**#7S[ZRT 00' 51'*'3 ,*71#1 2&# %#,#0 Acrida S[XR ," Bradyporus S[XY,"',S[XZ1&#"'1!-4#01,#51.#!'#1SModicogryllusgeticusT -&# 4-*3+# -32 =02&-.2#0 51 #"'2#" ', S[W[ ', 2&# b*T +T *T 3,cQ50'22#, 7GTITG,#!&2#*,"T+-.-4'!'V)]8,-,3T ?202',% 5'2& S[WT ," 3,2'* S[[VQ )#* G'1 0',%1 2&# +-12 '+.-02,2!-,20' 32'-,12-2&#123"7-$=02&-.2#0$0-+*-+,'T '012-$**Q)TG'1$-!31#1-,2&#123"7-$*#11),-5,=02&-.2#0," -, 2&# -,#1 5&-1# "#2#0+',2'-, '1 +-0# "'$$'!3*2 *')#S Isophya S[W[Q S[XVQS[XXQS[[VQPoecilimonS[WYQS[XTQS[XVQPlatycleisS[WYQS[WZQ S[XXQ Pholidoptera S[W[Q Callimenus S[XTQ Odontopodisma S[XSQ T S[XTQ Zubovskia S[XWQ Chorthippus S[XTT , S[YR &# 0#*'8#1 8--%#-%0.&'!* 8-,2'-, -$ 2&# !-3,207 !!-0"',% 2- 2&# =02&-.2#0 1.0#"',%T 9# &1 .3 *'1&#" 40'-31 5-0)1 -32 =02&-.2#0 $0-+ "'$$#0#,2*-+,'_10#%'-,1S'*3(S[WZQS[W[Q'0'-4S[XRQ3- 0-%# S[XUQ S[XYQ 2&# *#1#042'-, 5*# 00# S[YSQ -%T 030#1 S[XYQ 0"#* S[YTQ '-8' 0-3,2',1 S[XSQ 2&# 3,3 # 3#*2 S[XZQ S[YSQ S[YTQ S[[UQ 2&# 0-, #2#571 0# S[YRQ 2&# *#1#042'-, -30" #-0%#1 S[[U #2!T )#* G'1 ," 00' 51'*'3 123"7 2&# =02&-.2#0 ," 0,2'"_1"'120' 32'-,-, '-2-.#1$0-+2&#3,3 #3#*2,"$2#050"1 2&#7+)#1-+#,-2#1 -322&#'08--%#-%0.&'!*1.0#"',%S[XZT, S[YR &# .3 *'1&#1 17,2&#1'1 2-%#2&#0 5'2& 00' 51'*'3 -32 ** 2&# =02&-.2#0$0-+*-+,'Q#1.#!'**70#%0"',%"2#1 -322&#'0 '-*-%7Q #!-*-%7 ," 2&#'0 8--%#-%0.&7T , S[ZSQ )#* G'1 ," ,"7 /#&0#0 !!-+.*'1&+..',%-$U[1.#!'#1-$,1'$#0$0-+TV!-**#!2',%.-',21 $0-+2&#8-02&-$3- 0-%#T,S[ZUQ&#.3 *'1&#1*-,%5'2&)T8%7," /T8%7123"7 -32SagapedoT )#*G'1&1"#1!0' #"TZ,#51.#!'#1$-0-30!-3,207_1$3,Q$0-+ 5&'!& Z 0# ,#5 $-0 1!'#,!#S Isophya harzi ', S[XR, Modicogryllus chopardi ', S[XY, Uvarovitettix transsylvanica ', S[XR, Odontopodisma acuminata ', S[XT, Odontopodisma montana ', S[XT, Odontopodisma carpathica',S[XS,Zubovskiabanatica',S[XW,"Isophyadobrogensis', S[[VT , S[YX ," S[YZQ )T G'1 .3 *'1&#1Q ', 2&# )03)#,2*_1 031#3+ +%8',#$0-+?' '3Q2&#"#2#0+',2'-,)#7-$*-+,',=02&-.2#0T-&'1 '14#075#**!-,!#'4#"5-0)Q5'2&4#07%--""05',%1,"5'2&+,7 +-0.&-*-%'!*"#2'*1$-0#4#071.#!'#1T , S[YUQ GT 908 "#1!0' #1 ,#5 1.#!'#1 $0-+ 0-*"-4 8-3S Miramella (Kisella) carinthiaca kisi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
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Articulata 2012 27 (1/2): 17௅28 Zoogeographie
    © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/; www.zobodat.at ARTICULATA 2012 27 (1/2): 17௅28 ZOOGEOGRAPHIE Small scale ecological zoogeographic methods in explanation of the distribution patterns of grasshoppers Kenyeres, Z., & Rácz, I.A. Abstract We examined in this study, in a Central-European low mountain range, whether methods of ecological zoogeography can explain better the distribution patterns of grasshopper species and species-groups, than the methods of the historical zoogeography. Our results showed that zoogeographically defined microregions could be specified more precisely by the distribution of species groups of differ- ent eco-types than the distribution of species groups of the different faunal-types. We found that the macroclimate elements and landscape features determine the regional distribution patterns of the orthopteran species and species-groups with similar thermal and humidity requirements. Our case study revealed the impor- tant role of the ecological zoogeography in zoogeographical analyses of Orthop- tera fauna at small geographical scale. Zusammenfassung Wir haben untersucht, ob man mit ökologisch-tiergeographischen Methoden die Verteilungsmuster von Heuschrecken in einem mitteleuropäischen Mittelgebirge analysieren kann. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Unterschiede auf dem Niveau der Mikroregion bei den Heuschrecken nicht in den Fauna-Typen, son- dern in der Verteilung von Tierarten bzw. Tiergruppen mit unterschiedlichen öko- logischen Ansprüchen zu finden sind. Wir können somit die Elemente des Makro- klimas und die Merkmale der Landschaft identifizieren, die das lokale Vertei- lungsmuster von Artengruppen mit ähnlichen ökologischen Ansprüchen, bezie- hungsweise von bestimmten Tierarten bestimmen. Introduction Questions and methodology in the biogeographical searching have been domi- nated by the conceptions of the historical biogeography for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Japanese Kateretidae Fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 9.xii.2011 Volume 51(2), pp. 551–585 ISSN 0374-1036 A review of the Japanese Kateretidae fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Sadatomo HISAMATSU Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Tarumi 3–5–7, Matsuyama, 790–8566 Japan; e–mail: [email protected] Abstract. The family Kateretidae of Japan is revised. Nine species belonging to 6 genera are recognized, including: Kateretes japonicus Hisamatsu, 1985, K. takagii S-T. Hisamatsu, 2006, Platamartus jakowlewi Reitter, 1892, Heterhelus (Heterhelus) scutellaris (Heer, 1841), H. (Heterhelus) morio (Reitter, 1878), H. (Boreades) solani (Heer, 1841), Sibirhelus corpulentus (Reitter, 1900), Brachyp- terus urticae (Fabricius, 1792), and Brachypterolus pulicarius (Linnaeus, 1758). Heterhelus morio, which was synonymized under H. scutellaris by KIREJTSHUK (1989), is found to be a valid species, and is herein resurrected. Platamartus jakowlewi is newly recorded from Japan. Brachypterolus shimoyamai Hisamatsu, 1985, syn. nov., is synonymized under Brachypterolus pulicarius. Dorsal habitus images, illustrations of male and female genitalia, and other important diagnostic characters are provided for all species. A key for identifi cation of all Japanese taxa is also provided. Key words. Coleoptera, Kateretidae, taxonomy, new synonym, new record, key, Japan, Palaearctic Region Introduction The family Kateretidae, belonging to the superfamily Cucujoidea, is mainly distributed in the Holarctic Region, and comprises about 95 species within 14 genera worldwide (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010). Both larval and adult Kateretidae are anthophagous: the larvae are monophagous or oligophagous, while adults are more generalized feeders, occurring on true host plants only during mating and ovipositing periods; otherwise, they feed on a broader assortment of fl owering plants (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 73–107 FAUNISTIK Orthoptera and Mantodea in the Collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural Histo
    Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/ ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 73௅107 FAUNISTIK Orthoptera and Mantodea in the collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural History (Skopje) with an annotated check-list of the groups in Macedonia Dragan P. Chobanov & Branislava Mihajlova Abstract During the revision of the Orthoptera collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural History (Skopje) in 2004, four Mantodea and 102 Orthoptera species (al- together 1057 specimens) collected in the Republic of Macedonia were deter- mined. Furthermore, a revision of the literature about the Macedonian orthopte- ran fauna was executed and some own unpublished records were added. As a result of the present study, eight taxa are added and 27 taxa are subtracted from the list of the Macedonian fauna. Thus, the updated check list of the Orthoptera fauna of Macedonia comprises four species of Mantodea, 167 Orthoptera taxa and two additional subspecies. The study also revealed that two Orthoptera spe- cies must be eliminated from the list of the Serbian fauna. Zusammenfassung Im Zuge der Bearbeitung der Orthopterensammlung des Naturhistorischen Mu- seums von Mazedonien (Skopje), im Jahre 2004, konnten vier Mantiden- und 102 Orthopterenarten (zusammen 1057 Individuen), die in der Republik Mazedo- nien gesammelt wurden, untersucht werden. Zusätzlich wurde eine umfangreiche Literaturstudie über die mazedonische Orthopterenfauna durchgeführt, die weite- re Nachweise lieferte. Die vorliegende Studie ergab acht neue Taxa für Mazedo- nien, wohingegen 27 der für die mazedonische Fauna angegebenen Taxa nicht in Mazedonien vorkommen. Die aktuelle Checkliste der Orthopterenfauna Maze- doniens enthält somit vier Arten Gottesanbeterinnen, 167 Heuschreckenarten und zwei weitere Unterarten.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 17-24 June 2015
    The Western Rhodope Mountains of Bulgaria 17-24 June 2015 Holiday participants Peter and Elonwy Crook Helen and Malcolm Crowder Val Appleyard and Ron Fitton David Nind and Shevaun Mendelsohn George and Sue Brownlee Colin Taylor Sue Davy Judith Poyser Marie Watt Leaders Vladimir (Vlado) Trifonov and Chris Gibson Report by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser. Our hosts at the Hotel Yagodina are Mariya and Asen Kukundjievi – www.yagodina-bg.com Cover: Large Skipper on Dianthus cruentus (SM); Scarce Copper on Anthemis tinctoria (RF); mating Bee-chafers (VA); Yagodina from St. Ilya and the cliffs above Trigrad (CG); Geum coccineum (HC); Red-backed Shrike (PC); Slender Scotch Burnet on Carduus thoermeri (JP). Below: In the valley above Trigrad (PC). As with all Honeyguide holidays, part of the price of the holiday was put towards local conservation work. The conservation contributions from this holiday raised £700, namely £40 per person topped up by Gift Aid through the Honeyguide Wildlife Charitable Trust. Honeyguide is committed to supporting the protection of Lilium rhodopaeum. The Rhodope lily is a scarce endemic flower of the Western Rhodopes, found on just a handful of sites in Bulgaria and just over the border in Greece, about half of which have no protection. Money raised in 2014 was enough to fund Honeyguide leader Vlado Trifonov, who is recognised as the leading authority on the Rhodope lily, for monitoring and mowing for two years at the location visited by Honeyguiders. That includes this year (2015). That work is likely to continue for some years, but other conservation needs in the future are uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024
    Bisley Road Cemetery, Stroud Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024 Prepared for Stroud Town Council CONTENTS 1 VISION STATEMENT 2 POLICY STATEMENTS 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 3.1 General background information 3.1.1 Location and site boundaries Map 1 Site Location 3.1.2 Tenure Map 2 Schedule Plan 3.1.3 Management/organisational infrastructure 3.1.4 Site infrastructure 3.1.5 Map coverage 3.2 Environmental information 3.2.1 Physical 3.2.2 Biological 3.2.2.1 Habitats Map 3 Compartment Map – Old Cemetery Map 4 Compartment Map – New Cemetery 3.2.2.2 Flora 3.2.2.3 Fauna 3.3 Cultural 3.3.1 Past land use 3.3.2 Present land use 3.3.3 Past management for nature conservation 3.3.4 Present legal status 4 NATURE CONSERVATION FEATURES OF INTEREST 4.1 Identification and confirmation of conservation features 4.2 Objectives 4.2.1 Unimproved grassland 4.2.1.1 Summary description 4.2.1.2 Management objectives 4.2.1.3 Performance indicators 4.2.1.4 Conservation status 4.2.1.5 Rationale 4.2.1.6 Management projects 4.2.2 Trees and Woodland 4.2.2.1 Summary description 4.2.2.2 Management objectives 4.2.2.3 Performance indicators 4.2.2.4 Conservation status 4.2.2.5 Rationale 4.2.2.6 Management projects 4.2.3 Lichens 4.2.3.1 Summary description 4.2.3.2 Management objectives 4.2.3.3 Performance indicators 4.2.3.4 Conservation status 4.2.3.5 Rationale 4.2.3.6 Management projects 4.3 Rationale & Proposals per compartment Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 2 5 HISTORIC INTEREST 5.1 Confirmation of conservation features 5.2 Objectives 5.3 Rationale 6 STAKEHOLDERS 6.1 Evaluation 6.2 Management projects 7 ACCESS / TOURISM 7.1 Evaluation 7.2 Management objectives 8 INTERPRETATION 8.1 Evaluation 8.2 Management Projects 9 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES 9.1 Operational objectives 9.2 Management projects 10 WORK PLAN Appendix 1 Species List Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 3 1 VISION STATEMENT Stroud Town Council are committed to conserving Stroud Cemetery to: • Enable the people of Stroud to always have a place of peace and quiet reflection and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • (Orthoptera) and Their Phylogenetic Implications Within Tetrigoidea
    Mitochondrial genomes of eight Scelimeninae species (Orthoptera) and their phylogenetic implications within Tetrigoidea Ran Li1, Xiaoli Ying1, Weian Deng2, Wantao Rong2 and Xiaodong Li2 1 College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China 2 School of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hechi University, Yizhou, China ABSTRACT Scelimeninae is a key member of the pygmy grasshopper community, and an important ecological indicator. No mitochondrial genomes of Scelimeninae have been reported to date, and the monophyly of Scelimeninae and its phylogenetic relationship within Tetrigidae is still unclear. We sequenced and analyzed eight nearly complete mitochondrial genomes representing eight genera of Scelimeninae. These mitogenomes ranged in size from 13,112 to 16,380 bp and the order of tRNA genes between COII and ATP8 was reversed compared with the ancestral order of insects. The protein-coding genes (PCGs) of tetrigid species mainly with the typical ATN codons and most terminated with complete (TAA or TAG) stop codons. Analyses of pairwise genetic distances showed that ATP8 was the least conserved gene within Tetrigidae, while COI was the most conserved. The longest intergenic spacer (IGS) region in the mitogenomes was always found between tRNASer(UCN) and ND1. Additionally, tandem repeat units were identified in the longest IGS of three mitogenomes. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses based on the two datasets supported the monophyly of Tetriginae. Scelimeninae was classified as a non-monophyletic subfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Studium Vlivu Dálničních Koridorů Na Druhové Složení a Početnost
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at VSB Technical University of Ostrava VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA BÁ ŇSKÁ-TECHNICKÁ UNIVERZITA OSTRAVA Hornicko-geologická fakulta Institut environmentálního inženýrství Studium vlivu dálni čních koridor ů na druhové složení a po četnost rovnok řídlých ( Orthoptera ) diplomová práce Autor: Bc. Gabriela Tome čková Vedoucí diplomové práce: Ing. Ji ří Kupka, Ph.D. Ostrava 2010 VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA BÁ ŇSKÁ-TECHNICKÁ UNIVERZITA OSTRAVA Hornicko-geologická fakulta Institut environmentálního inženýrství Studying Influence of Motorway Corridors on Species Composition and Abundance of the Orthoptera diploma work Autor: Bc. Gabriela Tome čková Vedoucí diplomové práce: Ing. Ji ří Kupka, Ph.D. Ostrava 2010 Zadávací protokol Autorské prohlášení Prohlašuji, že: - Celou diplomovou práci v četn ě p říloh , jsem vypracovala samostatn ě a uvedla jsem všechny použité podklady a literaturu. - Byla jsem seznámena s tím, že na moji diplomovou práci se pln ě vztahuje zákon č. 121/2000 Sb.-autorský zákon, zejména § 35–využití díla v rámci ob čanských a náboženských ob řad ů, v rámci školních p ředstavení a využití díla školního a § 60– školní dílo. - Beru na v ědomí, že Vysoká škola bá ňská–Technická univerzita Ostrava (dále jen VŠB–TUO) má právo nevýd ěle čně ke své vnit řní pot řeb ě diplomovou práci užít (§ 35 odst.3). - Souhlasím s tím, že jeden výtisk diplomové práce bude uložen v Úst řední knihovn ě VŠB-TUO k prezen čnímu nahlédnutí a jeden výtisk bude uložen u vedoucího diplomové práce. Souhlasím s tím, že údaje o diplomové práci, obsažené v Záznamu o záv ěre čné práci, umíst ěném v příloze mé diplomové práce, budou zve řejn ěny v informa čním systému VŠB–TUO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers
    The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers Dissertation To Fulfil the Requirements for the Degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” (PhD) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, Abhijeet Shah born on 7th November 1984, Hyderabad, India 1 Academic reviewers: 1. Prof. Holger Schielzeth, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 2. Prof. Manja Marz, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 3. Prof. Rolf Beutel, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 4. Prof. Frieder Mayer, Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin 5. Prof. Steve Hoffmann, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena 6. Prof. Aletta Bonn, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Date of oral defense: 24.02.2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 5 Zusammenfassung............................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Genetic polymorphism ............................................................................................................. 9 Lewontin’s paradox ....................................................................................................................................... 9 The evolution
    [Show full text]
  • In Field Margins? a Case Study Combining Laboratory Acute Toxicity Testing with Field Monitoring Data
    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1874–1879, 2012 # 2012 SETAC Printed in the USA DOI: 10.1002/etc.1895 DOES INSECTICIDE DRIFT ADVERSELY AFFECT GRASSHOPPERS (ORTHOPTERA: SALTATORIA) IN FIELD MARGINS? A CASE STUDY COMBINING LABORATORY ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING WITH FIELD MONITORING DATA REBECCA BUNDSCHUH,* JULIANE SCHMITZ,MIRCO BUNDSCHUH, and CARSTEN ALBRECHT BRU¨ HL Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz-Landau, Germany (Submitted 7 December 2011; Returned for Revision 11 January 2012; Accepted 17 April 2012) Abstract—The current terrestrial risk assessment of insecticides regarding nontarget arthropods considers exclusively beneficial organisms, whereas herbivorous insects, such as grasshoppers, are ignored. However, grasshoppers living in field margins or meadows adjacent to crops may potentially be exposed to insecticides due to contact with or ingestion of contaminated food. Therefore, the present study assessed effects of five active ingredients of insecticides (dimethoate, pirimicarb, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, and deltamethrin) on the survival of Chorthippus sp. grasshopper nymphs by considering two routes of exposure (contact and oral). The experiments were accompanied by monitoring field margins that neighbored cereals, vineyards, and orchards. Grasslands were used as reference sites. The laboratory toxicity tests revealed a sensitivity of grasshoppers with regard to the insecticides tested in the present study similar to that of the standard test species used in arthropod risk assessments. In the field monitoring program, increasing grasshopper densities were detected with increasing field margin width next to cereals and vineyards, but densities remained low over the whole range of field margins from 0.5 to 20 m next to orchards. Grasshopper densities equivalent to those of grassland sites were only observed in field margins exceeding 9 m in width, except for field margins next to orchards.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Orthoptera Assemblages to Management of Montane Grasslands in the Western Carpathians
    Biologia 66/6: 1127—1133, 2011 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0115-1 Response of Orthoptera assemblages to management of montane grasslands in the Western Carpathians Vladimíra Fabriciusová, Peter Kaňuch &AntonKrištín* Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2,SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Montane grassy habitats in the Western Carpathians are relatively well preserved, maintain high species richness and are often important in accordance to the nature conservation policy in Europe. However, knowledge about the impact of farming on the habitat quality there is rather poor. The influence of various management types (permanent sheep pen, irregular grazing, mowing) on Orthoptera diversity and species determining assemblages of these habitats were analysed on 72 plots in Poľana Mts Biosphere Reserve. Altogether, 36 Orthoptera species (15 Ensifera, 21 Caelifera) were found, whereas the highest number of species was found on plots with irregular grazing (28 species), followed by plots with mown grass (17) and permanent sheep pens (14). All four measures of the assemblages’ diversity confirmed significant differences. Using Discriminant Function Analysis, correct classification rate of Orthoptera assemblages was unambiguous according to the type of management. Each form of the management harboured several characteristic species. Thus implications regarding the biodiversity conservation and grassland management were given. Key words: bush-crickets; grasshoppers; pasture; ecology; nature conservation Introduction or the influence of plant succession in meadows without any management (Marini et al. 2009). Higher species Various systems used to manage grasslands have a diversity was found in grazed compared to mowed significant influence on plant and animal communi- meadows in alpine habitats (Wettstein & Schmid 1999; ties, their species richness and abundance (Kampmann Kampmann et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of Acrididae (Orthoptera) from Jharkhand, India
    MANDAL: A new record of Acrididae....from Jharkhand, India ISSN 0375-1511603 Rec. zool. Surv. India : 114(Part-4) : 603-606, 2014 A NEW RECORD OF ACRIDIDAE (ORTHOPTERA) FROM JHARKHAND, INDIA G.P. MANDAL Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700053 Email: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION survey conducted by the author in June-July, 2014, from Barkhela, Kolhan Forest Range, Jharkhand is a state in eastern India. Jharkhand Chaibasa district of Jharkhand. The order shares its border with the states of Bihar to the Orthoptera is divided into two suborders namely north, Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh to the west, Caelifera and Ensifera. The suborder Caelifera Orissa to the south, and West Bengal to the east. includes short-horned grasshoppers, locusts and It is situated between 23.3500° N Latitude and grouse locusts, however Ensifera includes long- 85.3300° E Longitude. The Jharkhand state is horned grasshoppers, katydids, crickets and mole very rich in biodiversity and is the part of the crickets. The suborder Caelifera is represented by Chhotanagpur plateau, province of the peninsula 518 species under 214 genera and 11 families biogeographic zone. The recorded forest area is from India. Among Acrididae 285 species and 2.36 million hectares, which constitutes 29.61% of 134 genera were recorded from India (Kailash the geographical area of the state. Reserve forests Chandra et al., 2010). A notable taxonomical work constitute 18.59%, protected forests 81.27% and on Acrididae was made by Kirby (1914) in the unclassed forest a mere 0.14%. there are three series ‘Fauna of British India’ and he divided types of forest viz., Tropical moist deciduous, the family Acrididae into eight subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULATA 1993 8(2): 1 -22 SYSTEMATIK to the Knowledge Of
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Articulata - Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V. DGfO Jahr/Year: 1993 Band/Volume: 8_2_1993 Autor(en)/Author(s): Storozhenko Sergey Artikel/Article: To the knowledge of the tribe Melanoplini (Orthoptera, Acrididae: Catantopinae) of the Eastern Palearctlca 1-22 Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/ ARTICULATA 1993 8(2): 1 -22 SYSTEMATIK To the knowledge of the tribe Melanoplini (Orthoptera, Acrididae: Catantopinae) of the Eastern Palearctlca Sergey Storozhenko Abstract Data on the grasshoppers of the tribe Melanoplini SCUDDER, 1897 (= Podismini JACOBSON, 1905 = Parapodisminae INOUE, 1985, syn. n) of Eastern Palearctica are given. Podisma kanoi sp. n. and Podisma sapporensis ashibetsuensis ssp. n. from Japan are described. The new synonyms are established: Rhinopodisma MISTSHENKO, 1954 = Aserratus HUANG, 1981, syn. n., Sinopodisma CHANG, 1940 = Pedopodisma ZHENG, 1980, syn. n., Parapodisma MISTSHENKO, 1947 = Pseudoparapodisma INOUE, 1985, syn. n., Monopterus FISCHER-WALDHEIM, 1846 = Bohemanella RAMME, 1951, syn.n. Tribe Melanoplini SCUDDER, 1897 Type genus: Melanoplus STAL, 1873. Notes The tribe Melanoplini was established by S.SCUDDER (1897) as a group Melanopli. JACOBSON (1905) proposed Podismini as a new name for this group. In the most modem classification the position of tribe Melanoplini is following: MISTSHENKO (1952) considered it as a tribe Podismini of subfamily Catanto­ pinae (Acrididae); UVAROV (1966) as Catantopinae (without division on tribes); DIRSH (1975) as subfamily Podisminae of family Catantopidae; HARZ (1975) as tribe Podismini of subfamily Catantopinae (Acrididae); VICKERY & KEVAN (1983) as subfamily Melanoplinae of family Acrididae with two tribes (Melanoplini and Podismini) and YIN (1984) as subfamily Podisminae of family Oedipodidae.
    [Show full text]