JHEP05(2004)002 e y y y < of to b .pdf W the the and e find 2004 2004 2004 . deep- deca deca of + 3, 19, 23, Θ MeV together −− and with −− ch Ξ and + t May Ξ sensitiv 2 3 required /jhep052004002 tifications SISSA/ISAS ranges 1430 Mar used 02 olarized the = January are 40 p and or mixing iden 200 of P Chiral f are masses 05 + J widths consisten ep , ccepted: Θ 1 from jh states the A w Revised: that s/ estimate term tation = are QCD, er calculated ons for Received: biguous N this pap I to total University π e/ ry narro am Σ iv The dels Publishing ch viv the the These ar ba on A represen the tidecuplet aking mo t/ . of T enhancing el .i an widths. to T Expansion, rely ssa SU(3). splittings y and of duce MeV Physics es, scattering due while including our 1/N deca University v of ucleon. rates mass exotic repro 1970 n fla y Scienc hiral-soliton http://jhep.si atory ons, r England, < to c suppression tons, of effects ucleon their the or width, predictions lonian a fo -n deca of ab −− y bary in π Exact L Ξ t itself decuplet Institute Jagel Instan of m 27 find erall the deca y v Nat. b precise e < o by breaking calculate + University, w and ov and tidecuplet t l Θ and elemen aculty an .i exotic F predictions The l.g ts, and Physics, more MeV oles ac h ctet the bn SU(3) o okhaven of onomy the o but sufficien inertia redictions matrix some exotic Br , on 1790 Published Cambridge e erimen Sackler p Astr t of b Monop tly for t the ultiplets, exp oup, bary and Institute and suppress m CERN resonances. in calculate not atory, Gr and recen wicz Ξ ed e re-analyze to Beverly y or on lo e ons W + ael ab momen ory Solitons MeV masses 3 2 ma 2004 L W . and Isr t Physics axial-curren bary Poland orted Switzerland tend rliner = marek@proton.tau. [email protected] The ts. observ bary Division, U.S.A., michal@quark.phy. scattering of 1660 ct: P ligh Praszaà viv, that ar rep Ka of ow, ol J ords: l A ory Ellis Smoluchowski < , the they ak´ 2 3 singlet aymond el erimen + rek E-mail: T R Nucle Upton, M. Scho The Geneva, E-mail: Cavendish Kr E-mail SISSA/ISAS Θ = hiral-soliton c Michaà Keyw Abstra Lagrangians ° John Chiral-soliton I Ma widths with c m widths inelastic non-exotic masses exp the that predict JHEP05(2004)002 9 3 1 y 9 5 ts to as 11 15 24 21 are the are SM een and h b χ ] man SU(3) meson should [4 masses er × ctet t t elemen the explicitly o successes, and the non-trivial nev quarks Guadagnini (3) solitons approac structure hiral-soliton t on are c of wn eal o has SU curren elemen Skyrme the es matrix bary the app its y b whose e default in ativ hiral quarks ologically 2/3, c exploration, t quarks has matrix constituen t ucleon the of top osed tuitiv n deriv SM that est-lying as in t ligh as χ w prop the lo short-distance ucleon group-theoretical for the expressed ersions n ons ons the v ons ons in constituen Lagrangian, is t ks the SM the e prediction χ er, supreme bary same lac in CQM SM bary bary bary ev suggestion some χ view it axial-curren that w ersions the the the quartic phenomenological v In of effectiv the CQM Ho the for treats of t to er, reigned – has in axial-curren ation exotic and exotic ecause breaking ev SM the oin the 1 and SM other up b χ w p , ratio – of χ fields. form long ort of CQM. In tidecuplet Ho observ theory than /D the the an other ]. singlet tary MeV has the Widths out terms F supp Effects [1 on of y of of meson here. the of 100 symmetry the widths probably ys original y the b . y bary Deca ects tained (CQM) e deca for that apply hadrons, the all successful tegrated SU(3) on Breaking complemen terest, ated limit masses deca masses asp con of del in In theoretical not successes and in 5/9 a are t our y mo effectiv v of more do the the the an pseudoscalar een only Motiv e and b fla ons. w dels. the ]. prediction e for for for Remarks masses the 3 quarks v relev een symmetry Symmetry , minorit mo symmetry s bary of t-quark ha w but the [2 a QCD, d of et arguably considerable o ], as to prediction b 3 and ]. go ] is duction and , duction General SU(3) SU(3) SM) [6 Lagrangian d ts [5 its a from restriction [2 h χ structure, mesonic e ( phenomenological u, tro a e t tro as b ed ten constituen Despite 4.1 4.2 4.3 Predictions Review Predictions In Predictions Summary remained In whic del small h y the the terpreted e ...... 3 of 2 4 mo deriv The 1. Con 1 hadron ma considered in configurations presen effectiv fields, of purely — has relation suc b 5 decuplet, 6 JHEP05(2004)002 + < of e- in of of of er tal for are the b the oth 2 ties and and The h aon- I hiral b t: mass MeV , other hiral- ] nev h duces k c width sigma ery of of ]. c a SU(3)- masses ucleus. v [8 of eac < e ], ely n y MeV decades, 15 decuplet v analogies erimen ys the Θ(1540) 1660 , strengths. whic [17 o the with fm re-analysis repro 79 ha the the with disco w of differen < deca ], ectiv ucleon [14 t prediction uncertain exp and MeV h of < difference its deca 43 of + . within some simple-minded −− 0 of Θ atomic features N terpretations the exotic its QCD tal ts resp π them the it Ξ the prediction ]–[10 in whic m has ctet careful 2070 has MeV Σ and small the o pion-n predict rather of of the e a the ts, < ],[7 een molecules the < most is wing h of range b [5 estimates one to of SM een bining the w, erimen for 1760 and elemen estimates on ons, χ w or erified h 10 states, of Eac v F elo MeV . et follo the SM del has curren masses com MeV and exp . b b χ . candidate eac . use used un ostdictiv features and bary q ], . understand −− 64 mo 5 mass w masses includes a p haracterizes , alue e Ξ y γ 2 c SM 1430 the the 22 v 2 ey matrix vier. tary w e the / µ from to of χ / w but een , k m aon-bary Using sho 3 ]. γ , mass 7 of the k b , lo ¯ q w, , that feature, CQM of e a hea man predictions 2 ]. [10 range [21 2 that ], tidecuplet try w −− / onic the a / elo droplet 1 come Ξ in 5 ons ely ation an [23 the b also the with ranges: een the y to As eing axial assumed mass ucleus, = based for b ]–[16 = bary b an in the n ersion alternativ orates t een bary ma and I v of predicted complemen I inertia −− [14 had is −− and w the – 35 relativ observ wing Ξ has + er, the of = Ξ = the et therefore 2 and discussed (3) discuss a hes a on t Θ b and ev – J calculations J SM critically is to the incorp of follo e w y with and turned scattering exotic the SU χ del limit, degree w e e the tributions bary Ho v with SM 35 predictions. the data for for vier mo , should and tarit χ barrassmen the ] of As momen orted ha con approac ]. The of hiral 27 tidecuplet discuss large descriptions 12 c hea ucleon em in densities 13 including find understanding est-lying one rep , sensitiv a exotic an tly shell -n to , q , e range of w ysics SM. ecific the π ¯ q the correlation etc. is previous w χ description [11 tial lo to a CQM est 10 10 range tly on ph sp masses er CQM the b in as , ], in ], to er recen w breaking on [8 picture complemen h are the the the oten y the [23 to this [18 implications bary the the recen een p scalar pap hiral-soliton from strong est-lying yields uniquely a c suc t w term result in ma a ] the bary SM w SM of in This ond et the masses χ has and lo χ hand N complete this term b hadronic ], ligh are the π phenomenon, including er, within states within ons a 10 Σ of N Bey a 19 NA49 predict ‘bug’ ev of the the Ref.[8 π time, ], hes, , symmetry for and tations ons w of (1540) ] Σ other. of other new ons of ose to bary tities. in and the + [20 tributions [10 predicted oration ound, 22 ound a Ho vides ork, ects ons. binations carefully Θ , long b the 10 bary the ab exotic con bary CQM SU(3) purp and a quan pro SM asp in [10 approac t hes. relation order com MeV MeV ucleon other 10 bary χ relationship represen with × collab results the On 10 o 1 or seen. -n Ξ fm w ons framew state This The The In F exotic existence π t The discuss predicted the arian the these 1 the 1860 1850 een v 55 e SM. een aced . alue. w of the term. ' exotic NA49 χ as this the of and v ∼ the Skyrmion certain SU(3) in missing exotic bary singlet 0 in w to t Neither F the approac b SU(2) exotic this JHEP05(2004)002 ] 8 t t e ]. ]. in − [8 w for ta- the ery the La- and and 10 [25 alue [29 v that ctet. (2.1) ecific v quali- o + tation M matrix t general sp regard- namely and enhanc- Θ that olarized small ∆ SM in the t adjacen holds hiral a p ], here MeV χ in c agreemen ], expansion, t scattering. 10 represen unacceptably 1 w the . [6 c [28 d eing ucleon decuplet previously o while the somewhat 27 N the n differen other b ere mix alone note from the ts Represen kno / masses, w go a + 1 1382 y in e coupling from of whereas 2 3 ]. Σ ucleon to the for ctet, in W ma with made 26 o ), anishes = that , axial-curren ) the width, 0 , c v in . 2 h c requiremen and reduces P en explain y t N of 12 N 10 J and/or ( , ts Λ namely ultiplet. ucleon needs / , ev details excitation MeV extracted , to a 2 inferred O m lepton-n whic this -n (1 masses I 3 ulae deca ter-argumen t 10 [11 singlet , π the 2 the corrections in on O 10 ∼ ), one 600 and t . + Σ tly est-lying order 10 c 10 elemen ) , of = N 8 to elemen w rotor Θ Σ form ∼ N predictions π D coun the the − ons ( 2 c vs. lo Σ end the −− 8 I 10 elemen of widths. yield O ) N QC 2 Ξ − the the c the on of SM erimen Λ M y erage and 10 dep is the and non-zero bary matrix χ / ers N sufficien ecific = v leading parameters questionable, ] ∆ s / 2 b on a matrix t M ould 8 I and exp tization of sp w m (1 deep-inelastic − t that with deca ∆ [27 but ( the excitations, y of ] effect the are not + matrix SM that 10 O the mem b is O latter χ that t Θ SM exotic ts t – to [22 suppress tres in relies is quan M as χ more y in 3 of their alues ∆ in that tified ons b just small the v cen and the – −− ons ts soliton ortan a olarized erhaps that c is Ξ whereas inertia the p The of p the axial-curren means iden SM of bary N the w-lying alues cated , . / axial-curren χ argumen indicated e of imp the o bary v of tization 2 Since of 1 lo of 1 ordinate b breaking, I but 3 erimen of MeV y this ts ts axial-curren calculate 2 adv an een of co rates effects are , the and 10 b band use indicate 2 w quan e singlet resonances ), e y some I + = correlate e exp MeV c v in ects 231 −− et ctet e singlet Θ ewise mass. 8 and the b of N Ξ W o that ha − ( = suppression the en ], lik same deca data momen of dated asp singlet the 10 8 masses O 1970 other and 24 − alue giv test t 3 breaking and symmetry M the v , also collectiv the tre < ∼ of the 10 that oth term. states the the ∆ ould measuremen + collectiv b triggered an 2 in ligh are [19 M classical of w ctet calculations (3) scattering I cen Θ −− N ting. of soliton o π ∆ Ξ splittings , y larger the SU(3) 1 They SU has 10 , del accommo Σ o (3) the m ons the with these I the though the relev w . predict terpret predict the of coun ected t is of the t mo of predict alue < SU of in c the lepton v of ell. tally deep-inelastic h en tifications −− to of of bary e This and to N w duces exp with tre Ξ w , of ev are Since ould ucleon our ecific 8 that ). the the v as w MeV tro iden 2 c whic of Σ -n , cen sp applicabilit tre 1 ell, considerably widths in π N fla order erimen absence I t, MeV widths er, vided agreemen / on w SM w formal 5 masses the and cen of e . 1790 ev y (1 In The recall the application that bination χ the The Pro Review as t, Exp the w 2 3 O tidecuplet e −− ing mixing 2. W calculate Inserting an deca narro deep-inelastic com elemen In the with Ho ing tativ the is where 10 and grangian. ligh relied tion 8. for comparison Ξ 1151 with The JHEP05(2004)002 on er, the has (2.8) (2.6) (2.2) (2.9) (2.3) (2.4) (2.5) (2.7) ], (2.13) (2.11) (2.12) (2.10) pap should should bary [8 one biguous, of resonance particular, ons this excitations am ctet ons, hence o In In bary are ]. ucleon bary and test n analysis [30 , ctet α o ligh ultiplet: in rotational wn m principles. ]: the states. . the kno than tifications , , 10 and decuplet 8 22 ¶ , c γ ∗ 2 , to Ξ 2 10 first pioneering N I iden K the / the m N [10 other 1 and h namely: , − abandoned − radial of the y . for Σ β in from 1 , Ω , , , 1 suc 0 an m I In γ K ere α, γ γ γ , m oth ula > . 8 5 case w + 1 er, µ inertia or 5 5 γ b 20 , , of 16 16 = 10 s β solitonic 5 1 Λ order corrections ev γ γ + ∗ of − N − + m − w m the form Σ β 3 3 + 2 20 20 3 β conditions, tain ts β β 2 – the γ m β alues Ho In 1 2 = the y (1710) + + − = 4 v + − − determined of . − − con . higher ) γ – α α α N mass e α α α ∗ 10 Ξ tifications α for b 1 8 8 4 1 Ξ 1 3 1 1 the breaking of , to 10 10 10 5 1 N m momen , m − 0 + tally − w the ula + + − − ositivit er 0 iden + : : : : , p : : : : = no of the 2 ∗ ∗ ected 2 N < Ω bination ∆ I ∆ Ξ ected Λ Σ Ξ form Σ K N m β s m erimen soliton exp formally 2( These some with com m exp Whatev − is of cannot − y ]. exp ∗ . mass equal-spacing is are Σ γ α o an 28 = tification , γ m , tified them β β hiral-symmetry corrections c ratios 27 iden α, mixing on than , with and iden to ectrum satisfied [9 β standard the as ose mass sp ell w w the ose on (1440) imp smaller that ]: related N general [8 Analogous imp parameters bary vide Gell-Mann-Okub (1710) in leading-order quite are note the are N γ is origins pro not the the the as mix h h The also leading-order wn states. do h somewhat ey and e 8 e e whic that β ob w kno masses since These W b the Σ whic where suc JHEP05(2004)002 . ] . γ 10 [5 for ell- 10 , from 8 w (3.1) mass mass t Σ (2.14) (2.15) (2.16) (2.18) (2.17) (2.21) (2.20) (2.19) and the is symmetry decuplet alues β the the of and v expression As α, relation parameters differen 10 (3) , the 8 ]. SU(3)-singlet that case SU N in the but [32 obtain in the of the 9 the . calculate recall ons, breaking of of those ust 12 in e t order m , w parameters fit: bary Guadagnini = and ), ) from 10 γ , d mixing one t ]: ∗ the binations , m ons higher Σ elemen the Finally 22 (2.14 + and , −− m of . , com breaking 8 ). u for Ξ ossible , , , β p o [10 bary , + m γ γ γ differen Σ ( w hiral-symmetry α, 1 8 obtains t Λ d 1 1 MeV MeV / c least-squares matrix and 16 16 the fm (2.13 s relation m − m a + s spacing m − + 55 range 146 377 β one the . 11 + just corrections Θ in m 2 β β 0 efore and − − y u b = mass b – ) of + + − on < the ucleon us, m ws = = equal Σ 3, the n 5 2 α α α / 3 2 on magnitudes I in ) γ γ determine m tidecuplet 4 8 8 1 1 1 – (2.8 , u of b − hiral-symmetry 3 2 3 end 2 follo 5 estimate < c + + − 0 16 the m I vided to an a as = + : : : : + − as with ) − dep predicts fm β 2 is to s α the pro the + for of 10 / 10 N As β significance m e Θ + 43 Σ ( . N masses m Guadagnini . but =3 b i + also 4 I 0 α (12) one ∼ and + tial α Ξ N yield | alues 2 the the ∗ if 8 1 ) 10 to v can I related Ξ accurately oten CQM M ¯ scattering: ss of splittings: masses m p corrections is ∆ (9) determined data + as 8( the satisfied. spacings, This e yield N d the ¯ b π d predict inertia the mass and ell Σ mass y ucleon + that on necessary w of dels to 10 -n meson (17). equal u of existence t ma decuplet: (5) for almost π ¯ u is the mo ( h to to | later to in the and and that, quite t N passing alue ]. has h 8 v whic (2) 10 (14) in momen on 5 leads ordinary , , term soliton seen also one γ satisfied the relation the [31 t e σ commen the ons. note is bary is also v e e een and h h h ons, Reflecting for ha bination soliton wn, the W W Predictions w third 4 5 bary β e et W 3. com Differen whic the kno b that where α, bary whic whic corrections breaking A of corrections for JHEP05(2004)002 e is 4, of 10 on −− er, W the the ap- use Ξ ≈ ould duct (3.3) (3.4) (3.5) (3.2) (3.6) ev alues more state. ]. corre- m w exotic in v the w as N for higher, onsible bary not MeV π pro alues w [23 ho v , −− Σ a somewhat en additional the 12 and the do Ξ This resp , alue /δ than is, e ev bring v ducing as § . MeV as + of t tral w s as mass w MeV An It MeV Θ analysis is find the 84 66 w tro 74 m MeV . e m 2 e 84 66 + − 7) MeV ter cen measured v in 2 δ ould I ws, ). + − older w for o = en § : w § mass h that differen the N quark on ab the MeV masses 2 an 1885 N 1970 N (3.1 + follo π I π 1853 π (79 = Θ 11 Σ to < MeV Σ Σ 8 whic of use the = the =1539 eq. without = of limit increasing alues e −− § + −− the what , in v ons. d Ξ for −− Θ Ξ w 2 y 2070 and for er strange . Ξ e , I b 64 alue m MeV MeV MeV MeV m assumed In m m for s v γ particular, where ∼ m ] alues = made bary + of tak ). a < m ] v upp 7 30 60 the 90 [8 in u e and N MeV h and b parameters π , § § § § [33 latter of m ranges of (3.6 assumed mass , the Σ dels 3 tral β masses suc 638 MeV e 79 ] exotic alue, Since del for v 203 683 the α, v vy ref. [2 mo cen < corrections, MeV ed . ariation − alue ha (1710), wing mo MeV of e v 8 v cannot of that 84 66 in and 1786 hea term: – e − N 84 66 wns + − the MeV w SM: 10 6 fit + − the latter MeV Σ follo estimates er, prediction the χ alue MeV MeV MeV MeV in ery observ – M the v v ev fit , 140 1505 y usual effectiv ∆ est 140 t ranges w breaking the the this that a the 1569 unkno 34 69 the b the = = 8 103 of analysis < 9 is ho of . = but to with of s discussed ucleon the + in large reflect the § § § § MeV ] predictions It in Θ + 12 m -n find than the 10 the [8 in . Θ three π y 61 64 74 m del ] e N t = the MeV 489 quadrature. m note, y find − in w ) 1657 include more, uncertain ectrum b − [22 d mo e success e the the errors in mass MeV y the masses 538 < ), sp w m precise N W rather : In of π an γ + β α 45 masses er for the , : on + ensate Θ ed MeV Σ (3.3 w . u = hiral-symmetry 7 uncertain fm. tified w. m lo c errors quark erall, more ), m ∼ 1 Skyrme N certainly lo MeV bary term ( MeV < π prediction view, comp ultiplet: / MeV ) quark reinforced Ov s iden of N observ Σ 64 the 25% (3.2 m 10 and theory but the ] π the 79 m range is these 2. our , = (3.6 Σ [8 can equations er MeV 10 = of the that strange of ≈ N In the order π 185–195 N term: from the N one QCD π MeV Ref. upp Σ the determinations ranges π the predict Σ 1432 another three 2 Σ bining of ), t from Σ ratio ranges the in e ersion determine for § to to unacceptably unsuccessful ossible v v the /δ the yields for of p com o comes conclusion alue duce ha (2.21 h ons recen −− The The T v the ucleon ximately Ξ the on 1862 o w onds tro to -n eing m w quite underlying sp the pro needed δ up in no This in error = masses. where t obtained for π assumptions. masses whic b bary Using In fortuitous. JHEP05(2004)002 no , pa- (3.9) (3.7) (3.8) is used, (3.10) (3.11) (3.12) break- e del 10 MeV b Ξ . remaining mo      20%.      152 ¶ can 7 7 γ the ey 14 the ® = to 36: / / 14 k 14) 1 6 Hamiltonian: 7 7 / . and 56 5 5 B γ 5 0 of / √ , , −− √ √ p symmetry 10 + 5 / 2 p p / / Ξ p / 5 the to 2 2 (2 1 1 ely α 3 1 of p ): /      µ 3 predict , 35 mass 06 ¯ ¯ 2 35 . and e 4      SU(3) I (3.8 0 a ectiv w B 35 + 35 − order y in d = , , d MeV b , Θ del = orted resp estimate + ® , B 35 = from ] 23 the ® ® a 071 362 063 , B 35 . . . SU(3)-breaking , to mo , − i rep 10 the 35 B d B B 0 0 0 of 2 ˆ      S , , d Ξ / 2 = 2 2 , 3 2 of i = = = / / / the the (8) 8 / range induced the , , 1 1 β 10 35 expansion 2 0 3 , 15 D ¯ ¯ 35 of 35 27 , Σ ¶ to ¶ 27 27 ts c d 3 , a , ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ p γ γ . p B 35 ¶ γ      1 6 2 1 √      10 that a γ ypically B 27 B 27 decuplet, t MeV due c masses d 6 7 N 27 2 5 − + − + 10 , a / w: – mixings MeV + / + ® √ − + efficien 0 α 3 α ed Y 3 are , 605 7 and / ® ® = B elo µ Θ µ α β again 2 co p [ − , h – p B b B 2 2 µ 2 B 27 , , parameters + 1754 088 / I I wing 25 mixing 24      = a 2 . 2 2 leading-order 3 ctet 8 / see , / 0 I 1 = − − observ and o 1 α (8) 27 88 whic      27 , , e the 8 − d ¯ ¯ 6 6 = Σ ¯ ¯ follo the 10 = = 3 2 ¯ ¯ mixing Ω] W 8 √ √ αD discuss B 27 B 8 = = all , M the      of tation d 245 150 27 35 a d ∗ B 10 . . . e , c the a = c 27 0 0 − B 27 Ξ 27 the w + + 0 d , d c + ) and ∗ fm ˆ ® ® = = = ork, fixed ordinary H are ® = MeV Σ B B , , , 27 27 10 , , 49 B of admixtures (3.7 er . B 27 c 73 represen 2 2 d , a , , ¶ c 0 / / ¶ [∆ 2 ving MeV 1 3 , γ / in γ      ¶ = 1 =      pap 2 1 framew consistency 6 5 γ 5 5 the 10 10 8 Ha 5 5 Ξ], ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ 0 0 2 1 2 N 0 0 , √ √ I + + π √ √ 1646      masses terpretation the Σ = = = +      this SM α Σ α , SM. = in k 8 i i i χ 10 results µ α µ Λ χ 8 c d ∗ to , 10 10 ) the for µ 2 parameters , 2 orating B N 8 hec I I 15 | B B N = = t 2 c | | the [ the of I M 15 fm − − an B 8 w 10 B whose (3.10 d with c for = = = 27 set no y incorp . onding 8 basis b 1 e 27 10 relev y d c a h b Within W our = masses: the 1 I or whic problem together in Most F 10 where rameters, corresp ing, JHEP05(2004)002 h 10 − , not the the the the the the Ξ # α alue − suc fully wing ( 2 ecific v order do (3.14) (3.13) These 2 in to ¶ e . sp a to . ¶ and γ w that een follo γ 2 1 a extracted ely y + first b to states, 7 6 states masses, γ − Θ in wh MeV Inserting to − the et ] note α y ectiv on ¸ α ond 72 required [9 µ 2 the and (related µ other ) ¶ ¶ ¢ in → , also reason corrections α 2 not resp to γ bary 2 + , 6 1 e Y ! e N (2.7 Y tidecuplet 2 suggest of 2 v π 1 8 with one corresp W − ¶ ¶ + an Σ ts , is − ha γ expansion. ultiplet γ corrections β α MeV ]. 2 1 ¸ exotic Y h c 6 1 Y m h µ 2 6 wn MeV alues 4 1 50 N and [23 + ¶ v + ¶ / − 27 and − considered the mixing whic γ 2 − 1 + corrections. α mass corrections α kno 8 1 200 6 1 whic stable. a Y fm 2 ¡ µ α 5, µ to to the second-order µ . constrain 7 4 e ¶ − ons, − een the ¶ in γ the 51 of 1 22 2 b y fit . − 5 α yp 15 640 2 1 896 of t 0 due 336 − Y e . e of µ 100 bary ¶ v v 1 2 ¸ wing − + 2 + + quadratic Using o ¶ 2 → to excitations: 2 2 ∼ 2 2 ha Y α alues states + ¶ this , 2 ab ¶ ¶ s v calculating ositivit 1 4 basis ¶ µ Y I γ follo reasonably 2 ¶ γ γ p γ 9 8 second-order m 6)). 6 1 – 2 determinations of ¶ 6 2 5 1 e of − masses ¶ 6 7 / 2 t the the 8 b Y ] γ − γ + + non-exotic + the 1) Y 1 4 including − 6 1 the tal [8 – y in corrections α similar α the 1 4 + 1) on α mixings α + for − µ + µ rotational to shifting µ umerically ma α µ + + t ect effects T ¢ ( n α ¶ extracted 1) ( 2 ¶ 2 estimate T to t µ with 1) mass masses 2 from dominan 3 T ( erimen Y to + ected Y cedure these 2 128 resp lead Y ]: ortan µ + I T 8 1 the on − T exotic 2 1 included à the ) 2 2 5 5 of ( exp ond T pro exp + [10 3 imp 2 ( Y If T wing − t 112 I − − breaking bary 2 amoun Y µ T as (3.7 similar mixing 6 that 3 9 9 4 − − Y and the additional , + to ons other | (related 2 1 γ + + µ µ follo ) more Some + extracted 8 e = γ = recen are | 1 ¡ e corresp Y Y b fits + , ), ]. 1 1 b + | from note o µ bary that µ µ the 1 250 250 (2.6 −− admixtures and Θ β with 3 w | to Ξ µ t 1 [27 896 1 1 16 to β (3.7 m + + 10 β 60 60 from ould there symmetry 2 m literature. ultiplet " 1 À · · ely 2 − corrections w δ 2 could 30 I 2 2 2 | δ of m the for comes · ) I I I lik α 2 and | the that − I − − MeV mixing is indicate 35 een SU(3) 10 these in there = = = = 23 a to particular, (3.14 alues first-order ely w effect that ) ) ) − v ), 8, reassuring excitations et in lik T Y Y and mixing estimating b = but , ( ( of due and is hanges the c is (3.7 h Y and c β expression N ( (2) (2) 10 10 N e π It It These cate find, / 6)) v Suc E E del, o (2) estigated radial 8 Σ 1 6 o / e v SM, SM E γ alue corrections in as small ab masses mo in adv where of masses W 7 extracted χ v χ JHEP05(2004)002 2 t y , in of 1 ed b for the end fact alue case K final ts (4.1) (4.2) v holds ear phase (3.16) (3.15) some- expan- ties. e for though dep elemen the the the and observ app the er, 2 0 case calculated. already , same er in 1 momen v ositiv they h the I M o p expression pap are h, matrix treat w, despite The uncertain D whic and , . the and isospin. other systematic sum s SM elo to s this ) predictions the whic QC χ in b inertia o a m m er M of , as t Λ of w v ) considered / frame: t of (2.1 e with o 2 s the ) y en t and and and ts of m ϕ MeV w c c rest giv additional scop reliable practice m that terms elemen masses N 35 N ons no , B − and y to explained densit e in 0 ratio eraging a are the c on initial in in b v also momen . w a M N t consisten the As ¢ ( / bary , ject SM the the ψ 1 ond matrix bary ϕ in χ − a common , four p note τ order ey and 2 0 in sub series er migh ϕ 5 a for 49 b e Section v quite . 11 p γ the . o β M M 0 expressed 2 en the the is W ψ 0 is Considering are trollable lie )( ¡ Lagrangian e exotic − manner. M ) 2 M of on M − It alue b a giv – in ) 2 terms tum that v π π con ϕ . y 98 9 a of 8 infinite . erage the 23 fm. elativistic that calculations. . ϕ N r m 0 , v summing – (3.15 0 hence previous a = ma to N first fact error alues ossible. 29 − 2 = π v . wing ϕ del — = similar p ϕ 0 SM 0 1 momen the an 1 ig from /I up inertia: 1 the χ e B 2 a and the + 2 2 few I M Widths ]: mo K 0 b I = ( = meson → K follo it of a widths K in [4 in for formally t B B y 1 of the − with I in Γ ts y realistic ) factor: 2 from also the → L theoretically a on only denotes Ref. extracted ratio M indicated a B guesses, (4.1 Deca ( ) ts er, expand yield deca in calculated y ypical M ould p in outgoing meson t in momen e ev The comes yielding, t on w discussed yields (4.1 s organized b w = . small o ) y 2 deca t e m the the not w than ϕ in K b t Ho y p and 2 the (4.1 phase-space explicitly masses of Witten ectra constrain MeV of of elemen an are stands for ‘educated’ ), could and M of sp dy , c o y SM: for and 200 rather that tum M er small. N (3.7 Remarks when χ cannot and v , uncertain they ratio alues − pseudoscalar , o o-b v in mass see matrix a deca — w decuplet oth the teresting t e 100 the width is first b quite bar that Nappi w in a momen the the in = exactly ϕ is widths and delling and for in ), larger s found in h the General y The Secondly The denominator ucleon the and m note Predictions vide mo γ n (2.6 e ctet alue the spins, what of γ o pro inertia and whic for where M v factor Adkins, for w 4.1 that Whilst of 4. sions deca on JHEP05(2004)002 t t t t e e y a ]. of to as b w [8 are are w in ma con- with (4.5) (4.3) (4.4) (4.6) order i source It Rarita- presen presen ons B Here | teraction universal ying binations a states tal ximation, exotics, . should treatmen ). at (8) ϕ problem dimension. in y a ciated e the a a ˆ g bary O example on axial-curren | is on leading com coupling w e deca 0 t configuration. (4.2 of olv h but the g a t appro v asso to B in e e olv h one bary is in v to ons , here lik it. so whic = g difficult fundamen in ι linear that scop canonical enden ϕ soliton ust constan t initial and as in final p t ), M bary m related and leads and d ¸ The from problem, ould i 2 the relations o Here, ts the ) i ˆ it / cusing S theory (4.3 w ˆ and . S del, h 8 wn go fo 8 α turn (8) ϕ this differen (4.2 (8) a α ond fields differen mo written suc del-indep D coupling e o in D field ey is wing of 3 are spin-3 e elemen our 3 w principles 1 b 2 around initial ecause to b v t h mo has √ e ell-kno a b √ are the 2 h deviations a w y for w fla follo meson discussion). resolv b G the h , the ), − uc can calculation of y and whic of in c − m αi ) but h matrix ˆ the to t S on ), c (4.2 elativistic A . y whic ˆ Since expands ), S from reduction i us (8) αb α , (4.3 relativistic erned – a densit 2 whic Their index (4.1 ϕ e D v (8) , ϕb g i corrections 1 a mind impact (4.3 in-depth , deca one curren ximation, ∂ D non-r 10 form go 0 c of ibc = tak ts. g eness in d – i from G a N an ibc calculated 1 attempts / ector use principle, using d = G a are The the 1 v than 1 axial t appro when eep for in − ould ossible G in een k ] ys in osal wing p elemen w relations: still constructed b an L αi effectiv − and the to Lagrangian [35 extra D of s er widths e t disp deca non-relativistic 0 anish the SU(3). (8) follo ϕi ends, are rather cast t couplings can teresting v a m y an D , the e.g. e oin nev of their in 0 on = mak matrix b the p dep reiman our SU(3)): vy e ons the configurations, G are onen one t problem deca v h αi · erator to of out ctet at eral that 3 ]. A hea ha first this o later carries that mesons bary op the e [8 ab e this h = SM(see ] t whic sev h comp tidecuplet : v case, there at erger-T y cannot in w 2 χ an , [4 soliton of N an ha 1 (8) clear ϕ ], , terms 2 that in N 0 ˆ as whic een / in O whic e π of this ws, a is deca 1 b in [34 is g w extended axial-curren Goldb and infinitely spatial linear ed e ts it rescaled in commen , but calculate in on v to a follo in consensus (as ], as spin ha en is spinor and and bary appropriate discussion ev of [34 no couplings written terms iα observ ) t elemen problem , what is c e transforms a A is in decuplet related factors b w N h ons It In The There t (4.6 a / er. kily discussed winger generalized deformations en this 1 h uk urthermore, y Sc use F bary appropriately Luc Y stan constan giv since where then Lagrangian already in matrix of whic form of considered Unfortunately pap b there As detailed JHEP05(2004)002 ]. w to no er, in- the the the the ons ons, con- [38 eron elo (4.9) (4.7) (4.8) ev order (4.10) b to to w are singlet for yp discuss in ys need bary olarized h their bary ] decuplet from Ho the p e ximation, symmetry [6 t the corrections due 10 w and corrections, of deca them s semileptonic states ) with s ], large ortional m from the [8 and appro m use phenomenologi- then ]. the eron (3.9 SU(3) discussed e t of w splittings, prop yp [37 ysical this h wing field, concerned. ph together with from In are enhancemen corrections explanation inferred leading presen is c mass ]. follo limit e wing, additional ts widths already the ultiplets, N c ultaneously the the the y [36 m , N the admixtures As follo ciated ting 9 ultra-non-relativistic gets ucleon sim in ¶ mesons them y analysis / . 27 n urthermore 2 b 5 deca to ] y F (8) the ϕ ! tain G asso semileptonic large coun ˆ . = constrain reflect. 2 2 qualitativ O the the [25 1 date breaking include In 14 whether c G G of a con in ignore ely . 2 6 1 1 additional of mixing. in t /D N include + e length the t 2 has onding they F + − 1 e w a also but an G widths as pseudoscalar-meson 1 1 erator ectiv w G h SU(3) e 2 1 vides er. 1 2 – ortan y G G , one suppressed determined pseudoscalar w op those 1 1 2 2 that reliably accommo tation with 1 of using analysis − far + gets pro resp elemen 11 to 1 whic G pap corresp + + as imp e, 0 calculated to deca Here, states, the the require 1 2 ts. – as N en G v 0 0 singlet the G h o Ξ when ts G G ev ons π + − or µ This this g the ab 0 0 suc à not. ould the , represen 7 ultiplets, matrix er, 10 of G G presence 5 9 from w in N erimen bary m t estimated ecomes or completely effects, is e tribution to ev and, Θ predictions freedom b = = = e = efficien couplings, w , K 10 expansion, b wn on the tidecuplet anish. exp duced 2 g states con it N , are co 10 10 c v F D scop 1 Ho our , an coupling, N 1 in non-leading G G N errors 0 tro kno π and can / ts bary G g in or G and N 1 in the is included enough N coupling 0 10 are Then exotic N calculable π , ts een limit axial-curren the G the g 8 2 ∆ corrections ties , . additional are no w π ond t 1 ossible widths. has scattering elemen s masses, g widths in h-Gordan ys determinations g et p G ey the m the y b magnitudes more these b 10 decuplet to has on ately of one ts of three constan structure of singlet of the deca to ar their order deca lies lepton Clebsc constan matrix uncertain bary ys, their of ctet, sep the as h small t o duce mixing symmetry 2 the soliton related , our of estimate tial 1 constan source endence deca v , widths tro with 0 whic on and leading Since coupling addition to couplings algebraic pure are in G t . dep oten tidecuplet hiral s the h SU(3) ys, One The In A c p eron w analysis, the estimates try the an m yp SU(3)-fla of fluence in longer nection as axial-curren deep-inelastic whic dimensionless of h or smallness whose the breaking. widths and These Neglecting mass kno cal 4.2 the deca all JHEP05(2004)002 t ) h in or to tly for tly the the F ts . axial- whic (4.13) (4.11) (4.15) (4.14) (4.16) (4.12) (4.13 or 1 matrix ] sligh G 9, bination decuplet t example, . useful Therefore compared expansion 7 [39 width alue sufficien insufficien . c erimen e v or 2 and com only = in singlet is F b ∆ not N asymmetry G 0 wn / calculating exp is 10 ]. 1 G en The the G [8 kno for other and of measured ). giv orsens and the y in ucleon axial-curren should for 10 ]: 1 w n . these ], not find 8 ted an of 0 G the ) h , e (4.11 is an [40 § ), suppression w on the w of [25 longitudinal 3 in . from whic 2 bination (4.14 ), need singlet , to (4.8 ratio 13 G this 2 e the suggested 59, 20 view prediction (4.9 G com yield . = the alue only er, , 0 . cated /D . as v h in + . N e o 2 9 consistency 4 F , ev that . 3 π to Using . . 0 ' N w 6 8 new 1 p . w π ' . G sensitiv information the 22 −− extracted adv on g y 5 1 G a whic , 2 the ' 15 ts, Ξ Ho × /D is = 0 A 0 G 1 parameter A small, N w tal . recall er, = tly g F g 1 er, G v 1) bary deca expression M N e theoretical . 2 – reiman → N π with G 2 10 and 0 ∆ ∆ kno range w ev of 20 G F 1 2 1 ∆ π m G elemen . . w 3 + the 12 find find § g recen 2 the 3 the 0 to M + erimen + N er, tal , Θ 5 – e Moreo π . . Ho 9 0 or N § = 07 to along . 8 ev w alue 10 . π erger-T scattering 10 from (0 G 3 2 v exp and 0 in w ould g . calculations, N G 17 the = ), G t 02. ] 0 presumably G ewise, w matrix ) = N . = § 7 Ho 10 π 0 ' erimen ∆ of 1 e is undetermined for = the g [29 SM 10 . 13 0 Lik Γ small, w . G Goldb ) § 2 input = 0 χ A necessary (4.10 G . with ucleon G (4.14 exp g enden G 13 ), the non-zero. N la 56 use is ely . to ), −− N = e of MeV 0 of (4.13 a ` either π it the Ξ in widths need b from g N (4.12 indep non-exotic ) e and y 10 w 125 N (4.16 correction w alue lepton-n alue alue π relativ in and G no t v than v with v t, g ÷ for ma e compared e + , (4.16 b related v narro bination ell Θ tal alues alue 115 w ha is kily and guidance to v v prediction enden range useful e and = ucleon: 2 elemen the further, com small the predict smaller t w n a ) Luc G ∆ the umerical , tral of seek to -dep . Γ erimen n MeV the 2 : 1 the ceed 2 fully a cen G G deep-inelastic (4.14 93 exp compare G indeed coupling first in matrix differen pro extract order = t 2 yield require e is the the width t widths and o the not w π G to h tly y y T Inserting In 0 finds leading-order F explain es G considerably ould ould ell olarized one of to Unfortunately deca is The w where for extracting elemen this, Inserting w w p deca sligh Using with do curren whic the estimate JHEP05(2004)002 - e t e e g s It = = = so er- b b w ul- tal the . 8 0 m SM, case that m 10 to χ M (4.18) M (4.19) (4.20) (4.21) (4.17) of higher /G / inadv an e M 0 1 here see v differen of as the is erimen G factors with should e M one and w coupling ha corrections 0 of ] e . second y (for W in t B [9 ys exp b −− ) → to just t that the t g Ξ the 66 ( B MeV that , ys 09. . deca Γ is . 0 1 0 in widths R in . 1 enden formally B t y y recen impacts corrections, ) → deca 0954, = is to g . and this ( B y 1 couplings ultiplicativ and 1382 suggest b + R ts consisten indep 10 , the m deca decuplet = Θ = than s on ersalit × and these M en Γ 2 ely of . . / m 2 width are 10 corrections the . 8 ould 1 the of agreemen of 1 giv MeV s . y w M bary univ √ amoun M t for 1 e 2 tidecuplet ectiv and . m larger ≡ . for y MeV b of of 7 t terms alues b an 6 11 ¶ deca ]. v . origin = ratio 8 resp in using 42 10 10 understand = CQM + ratio literature, 20 , ould M 10 G and excellen Θ M / the 3 K [9 enden ed the = w to 0 0 / G p y the the of , the transition in 4 e suppression 3 K 5 1 M . M M . the additional N p / The , π in -dep y – lik 8 umerical µ masses, 20 10 c predictions calculation 10 where 2 ted 1 5 b t K considerably n assumption ]. M alue + that M 20 displa ], e N G × M M = v 13 correction discuss N [8 7 is v and w / [8 to that 2 N o t 8 . – strong N + to ctet ould M 10 it to in of 1 in are no presen o and 3 w a their 10 2 the in ab + M M G . t presen → ratio initial = er w Θ 2 10 G ys ], + are er 14 3 ∆ recall Θ enden G ¶ M the and elo 3 ev [37 = 8 π theoretical small, pap e the ultiplet, b M erse dified 10 deca w 8 of factor misprin w t reader π v dep factors the m M N predict ∆ separately: 8 reduces M to h a / ho c ely in 0 = mo N / the prediction y 8 , π opinions N as = for + the ximations e g M M t the w an M Θ M b due ould whic + these results h / presen if decuplet µ / Γ whole y 0 deca , Θ w success that of the 10 relativ b 8 Γ + to 10 ] h M appro there the M is whic The Θ split M [8 original the ys M Differen suppression . mean that of comparison, er them, to has single in whic = mixed b the e for the M t claim ratio 0 deca / h aluated or the + 0 ] 5, arious ones. the factor of F corrections um M v / ev M Θ the t than M n [41 eac 2 to scop the e with tical ]. enien c ‘undo’ ). for as of v the yielding of y v = argued the correction, N b for [12 the 0 / this to ha due ), ortan of t in width iden 1 (4.3 con as decuplet e authors /G view w MeV w is examine agrees 2 in ond imp written width 5 are MeV easy . h G It It In total to enden ey The explore , tly 7 is mainly b 5 tering ultiplied e / resulting 1754 it The where is more ten assumptions. that the try 1151 en tiplying calculated is 4 Although dep estimates m order inclusion w whic JHEP05(2004)002 , e is 10 of of or w ery F and h M v / 2, ratio, (4.27) (4.26) (4.23) (4.25) (4.24) (4.22) . 8 a ratios, terms. 0 10 1 oration = R factor M whic G 2 = a M non-exotic previously G / date + mass the R Θ and Collab M that (Γ 0 width, within G , quoted + parametrization the 0 ultiplet fact to Θ NA49 of accommo without y , G cases m Assuming . b , 2) to the . wing . the 1 ranges the + y symmetry-breaking MeV alues G y similar ρ MeV b ]. v one Then, ( follo , MeV b , del ∆. 10 1 from > . MeV widths , . [43 ¶ extreme measured 0 1 10 are tly 5 5 = = mo the for o G . h range. = = MeV the + + − + MeV w include MeV + + t MeV MeV the MeV Θ Θ ) ) + + the enables e Θ Θ 10 1 1 del 10 1 Γ Γ Θ Θ eep 10 enden whic w 1 estimated k corrected Γ Γ /D /D adopt 8Γ 3Γ = = the = = ≤ . . use stemming G mo F F e 0 1 + + and to −− for for + + correct tly for for w 9( 3( Θ Θ Θ Θ for Ξ indep ∼ ∼ – e prediction outside when the Γ Γ Γ Γ and µ and 10 width w 1 6 − − 4 . . 0 . 14 π to = 30 ed = recen K 10 and order the . + v G – 13 10 for for 0 freedom Ξ + 11 8 for for MeV − + Θ − logic as in expressions 1 Ξ Θ = = of . Σ ²G = = extract analysis, w the 2 Γ → the 1 1 5 → t remo 1 1 for closer . ≡ h whether 82 16 the 75 the G G somewhat to . . 5 . −− 10 G G sign 2 is 10 −− 6 2 1 Ξ hanging puts , of and Ξ e c are G = that for lie Γ , , Γ ert = whic = = e 0 0 8 1 cases: v , , 10 , . . 21 bination widths 6 1 10 10 10 see in MeV . . G /G /G 15 17 ositiv y G 10 −− , 1 e G G , same ectiv 1 subsequen p 14 16 relation 10 com estimate 0 Ξ G = = G W without ely 8 G = = 0 0 . deca the of the get e. ρ the y ecomes + 0 0 extreme this G G v irresp e b than o in Θ obtain G G ≡ o linear eat w ratios w, ratios 1 unit w ab total t G width theoretical the rep elo hosen w couplings: that, 25, one ould c MeV the . t solutions alternativ b w of w elo e , 20 the 18 enience w del smaller of v y b e no onding v recen = w predict only here w ha mo sho ma e consider discussed con e 10 remark sets can still e width elo w fix e w G e e b o w or that SM w w w corresp obtain ys e W W One F are χ t Another b not, As 8 MeV) deca narro and but The Note or get Using the where correction this, 1 Hence, presumably to 2. Numerically JHEP05(2004)002 t e e y D = 8, in v a . W o the the the 0 w QC from logic . wing 0 y /D ab Λ . to b SU(3)- for mixing / F H ρ the s differen linear the follo parameter ys tidecuplet m the in suppressed for an of ws coming the alues y the yield fixing tation deca v 2 widths terms ) are of e for explained in v y 10 follo 10 ) o tal to ys series as biguit 10 while /G ab assessing hamiltonian – deca for up one M am 10 represen h / deca to ed 0.8 G if functions erimen corrections ( M M the on ( 10 to s infinite aid as discussed whic / of , some of exp ) , m 8 hanism an splitting ). an as bary 0.2 is describ /D (8) ϕ M ratios that F as / O 0 mec the fits sum using of (4.15 e, square mass see M from the v y ( 1 to o There . residual suppression, ρ b rescaling e 1 0 the the . ab erator alues W v § and arious due to ary the 4.2 v t op . 5 corrections, v . ρ ys – y y 0 implicitly figure e s urther b include due suppression e w F = m The 15 in w e, deca deca compute discussed, ρ . , – differen v w, ). discussed section ρ the o ϕ also e the p w elo for the plot of ab of of corrections y mixing b 2 (4.10 ) e b for range to parameter y er, shall Effects w 10 already as decuplet ev e , i coupling del /G w the and range W from tation ell g G As 10 for analysis ho mo w of ) G discussed ws ( aluations 8 the sensitivit as wide the ev M as (3)-breaking wing. of corrections ), / ratios, Breaking follo 0 a wing, in oured the represen y ratios SU v treated. M (4.1 follo k couplings ( also for fa . / follo the functions the ties mass ) vided, in the of are hec 0 ersalit the ely 10 of 10 c umerical are the as the n pro equation M M in from to to / to e In ectiv b alues /D alues the Symmetry M there v last and ultiplet V ( . F y ect uncertain 0 calculate In m non-univ resp 1: M order of ma the /G w corrections that ignored 1 resp ], SU(3) ys, In the no G ratios stemming compared [8 erage e s are 59. = umerical . alues v m corrections. recall – masses these the breaking W v and 4.3 0 a with Figure section. n of where ρ deca as JHEP05(2004)002 . ) ]. if N ρ to N 28 π , g , yields (4.30) (4.28) (4.29) (4.35) (4.34) (4.32) (4.33) (4.31) (4.12 [8 ® hand, coupling of B for in 1/1.19, , expression 2 / 3 earlier parameter ula other . 10 new 1 of ¯ ¯ ucleon factor G coupling -n the form a , (8) 2 ϕ the neglected π ˆ prediction y O 27 alue − b of ¯ ¯ the v On the 0 0 H ere discussed e 2 ϕ the B the v G w 27 p , c the 42 ¸ 2 h to . ha ≡ ratio / w, 2 from 1 1 15 0 27 e to reduce 0 27 0 27 G elo reduced w = 27 mixing. + e mixing the whic G ­ b G e 3 . 27 ] 0 . , 10 c b D 1 27 B ts, and 3 2 π c G 1 see 042 [44 ons, p . × should QC 10 , obtained 0 e + + ¯ ¯ ¯ tation tation c es e i 1 Λ corrections 10 w ® e 09 8 ons, / + 27 . . w bary G + b insensitiv s p G should B 1 efficien | giv 1 G 1 2 as , . ¸ 27 ) 65 (3) m of 2 0 + 2 . co = – / 27 G (8) π bary − 17 can ® 3 G a then ˆ in 19 SU 0 N O represen represen quite This B h = 16 | 1 27 and, 3 (4.19 14 ), → G , 10 499 ¯ ¯ 8 = . 2 ctet – is to p (mix) ∆ ). 10 0 / on h o in ≡ + + π 10 3 (8) ϕ ¯ ¯ ¯ R mixing G whic N order p ultiplets 1 ˆ + G O (4.18 N , 27 10 10 to = → due onding m G ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ 0 1 bary 0 ) → G G (mix) , ∆ the 2 1 g N reduced · ( ∆ B first = (8) 27 ϕ find R (0 , N + ˆ R only from 10 is O 2 the π for e N 0 / to = ¯ ¯ g mixing, 0 G y w 1 = , the extracted → corresp G t π 8 3 5 1 that ers B (mix) ∆ · ­ ~ p N 2, , breaking 10 b G is / R 2 2 = → deca ratios 7 B 27 G 1 2 / 1 the 10 with 1 a ∆ 2 ∆ um tation (3) 8 = of + coupling R n elemen = ­ + one can ] frame 0 binations, M ρ SU mass N 10 figure = G to N [44 old G alue i of ons π the com ≡ v mixings the g alue 10 represen calculate v matrix in 10 the from B the | previous e duce the bary G to w to these (8) ϕ 1/1.14, ork , factors tro the y ˆ ecific seen w O include case, include of ed. due in case ¯ ¯ e e v e sp 0 8 e t squared h b w w deca B w factor ­ Using Decuplet Finally the then ∆ the neglect a terms ] either whic can impro e e or y b when w in In W where [44 for In F where for It is constan JHEP05(2004)002 t ]. § ys are ons 28 that 13 , , . (4.37) (4.36) (4.38) deca tation y ® ucleon [8 13 directly bary differen B example -n + including discussed , the y π ® 2 or / 1 B ] for this four couplings , ossibilit the deca 2 represen 10 after / [39 ¯ ¯ p those of 1 3 ) decuplet and 1 previously . (8) ϕ 27 can ¯ ¯ 0 t . mixing the ˆ O 59 to 2 . ¯ ¯ § 0 general, (8) (4.32 ϕ 0 in en G ons figure ˆ 3 B O 2 3 . , = find: , including In ¯ ¯ in op tation including 0 2 in accoun 13 e ons ¶ + / - bary 1 B ). es ² w 1 /D calculations , v to = 2 27 G F / in ­ plot bary 2 019 1 lea found N . 0 8 SM (4.33 . e represen 0 B 27 − N for ­ 0 en χ effects obtained c π as 0 ), 0 W + effects, g ) ρ B 27 and /G + c G 5 tak d ρ 1 . . 1, /G D tidecuplet ® . ), N 0 G 1 ≡ + / (4.32 B 245 an ere 17 result made, QC G ® + ≡ , . (1 27 tidecuplet range w 2 0 ), Λ 1 B ρ / ≡ (4.13 + O – = H / , 1 an tly s + B 27 2 ® ρ form / tal d This 10 10 1 17 m B ¯ ¯ of (4.19 SU(3)-breaking 8 , and completely G – ¯ ¯ 796 2 , . the (8) ), ϕ / to ys and 0 D 2 curren breaking, 1 ˆ 0.8. (8) ϕ O 0 in for µ G erimen ˆ ¯ ¯ parameter 10 B 10 O QC 0 due 2 1 ¯ ¯ to c ¯ ¯ prediction are deca × (4.12 Λ 0 B / parameter exp 2 , − the (8) ϕ B . to s 10 2 first-order , ˆ 1 0 / 12.2 O (mix) 2 G of m 1 they ¯ ¯ text / G the R written 0 the 1 = discrepancy = 10 to of 8 (20)%. e − B of ­ ρ ­ , b 0 0 N the O 2 2 . breaking, B 8 B 10 / the (3)-symmetry N ortional y G with 1 c d of π in 13 factors 8 e and g Including ≡ functions + + ­ SU v leading-order ma accuracy = prop ) 10 duced ties as = of function etter SU(3) G the N i ons. b a the remo calculation tro N of 10 (4.35 π t in term text, as mixing, to g B did correction discussed | bary e N v the the 10 absence N (8) ϕ uncertain migh The π ha ˆ G that, O than in ctet g tation ¯ ¯ e to o ] compares complete — 2: 0 the 8 presence of yields w only us ] B to [40 expression h ­ In ject the [34 more 07 arns . alues only a where represen in discussed where mixing coupling whic In w The v sub Figure 0 JHEP05(2004)002 | , + to 59 [8 10 . ys: Θ not 0 G y | 0, is b (4.39) (4.40) (4.41) = shaded onds deca h = er en /D + quadratic ® ] 10 F when K B giv upp whic G , corresp [44 2 + full for / if 1 0 n ts fact, The , . en 10 the /G 2 2 band ¯ ¯ ). → In 1 p . tation, G Ev . + G 2 (8) ϕ × 3 use Θ ˆ 14 10 G ≡ ). O (4.33 impression ¸ constan ¯ ¯ 1 6 G ρ 0 ), + 0 10 shaded 1 B − and of H the , er (4.41 represen 1 G 0 2 wing 27 differences: w should / (4.32 G c to 3 lo K 14 11 27 2 1 2 7 ), 27 + follo form + one ­ + − the parameter p 0 some 0 the 0 function (4.19 trary 27 B 10 G the G a → a the ), and H are ≡ linear con ≡ + + ], of with 10 0 8 ® 0 c Θ 10 duce just (4.12 [39 2 5 – B H the H , there of 2 tro + the 18 / corrections, not terms, text 1 in 10 – t of mixing function than but is e , , 27 G a ¯ ¯ the t w 2 2 ], · to ]. as G G [8 in (8) ϕ aluation 10 [8 1 2 1 2 ˆ ys, erage mixing N O elemen G ev in v due rather ¯ ¯ N in a + − 0 , π 3 elemen 10 1 1 g tal B en the deca K ]). , G G + = 2 the later. term 2 2 1 5 / giv discussed N [43 3 matrix SU(3)-breaking K → + − for 10 + erimen a 10 these er + matrix 0 0 included ­ G N Θ that coupling the ev y G G of 2 through → exp B 27 of via w find discuss + d y not to ≡ ≡ M Θ e e ho bles the 2 deca = 8 w additional w 10 as ucleon alues i H for to deca M v w H -n 10 t an (see ]. π ossible, resem B | p is discussion still these, onds [40 and − squared The (8) π ula (56)] in of ˆ the O comparable differen 3: ¯ ¯ magnitude ecome The There expression is could eq. small or 0 10 form corresp b F four range B • • terms ­ In This Figure whose band and the also JHEP05(2004)002 t e a is w, w y t not this b 2 while NA49 (4.42) (4.43) (4.47) (4.44) (4.45) (4.46) (4.48) / rather in + are 1 y narro , t is Θ b ρ apparen ys elemen = it of ery of . v ρ not 2 e deca p orted b . that is rate for × 2 significan 10 matrix . h rep y p , ¸ mixing: y 27 to × 27 seen ery H ¸ v function e deca H whic should b 27 deca 2 27 + 16 . tation d H squared − . the Θ 0 3 2 of π can 27 tially 0 10 − d . + − arying It the H 3 2 Numerically , is 0 − 10 corrections . 0 oten 93 10 whose Ξ . + ρ 27 H 22 p represen 0 factor . , . , H 2. 10 H that 0 0 10 wly-v / suppress − → a = 07 27 G 10 1 . . are H c − K the 269 535 slo 0 16 to G 2 . . . 6 7 . 10 8 10 −− 27 1 1 = 10 0 + coupling 0 + c a Ξ + 10 M M H − 3 7 ρ g + = = / duces / = 10 G from – Σ 10 + parameter is N 0 + − − 10 the (3)-breaking H 22 K of Θ tro . π H prediction the K 19 of + M → H 0 tending − 10 + in M y + ]. SU 22 10 for π N , – − . 2 corrections G of − c t y + + Ξ 0 15 SM / → · 10 −− = Σ a . 2 5 [43 − y e 1 1 + χ coming → 0 − the Ξ w Ξ v → 10 (mix) Θ K − in = = → vicinit + −− is + + G R ha −− (mix) the Ξ ρ 10 function N 1 1 K (mix) Ξ elemen 3 e −− that 10 ersalit R + G a → (mix) Ξ R w factor the = = ) · + N for amplitude g R = similar state ( Θ as → − − 10 in ys, a − π (3)-breaking R + K K G π + (mix) Θ corrected 1 + matrix + + in this − 3 SU − R 10 that − N Ξ non-univ deca Σ Ξ reinforcing explicitly to of squared → een → yielding the = 2 act Ξ → → + the correction y b , the − (mix) Θ −− ρ 25, of −− . −− 10 (mix) Ξ K R (mix) Ξ 0 Ξ the close the of has + R 2 deca that R − exhibit ∼ onding of figure from is Σ M plot of → alue − e This v define K case corrections w −− 10 squaring ossible ]. + Ξ from to 2 o p corresp 2 − [8 us form: factor w e Σ y the t examples b M The in → see correction ersal. emphasizing In Let The the • −− en figure e (mix) Ξ case. and further The R obtain: These sensitiv has giv Another These univ W In JHEP05(2004)002 , ) − ). ts of as as 10 π for the the and w and w er (4.1 aried since + , cases, width (4.50) (4.51) (4.49) h b v exotic in SM, (4.39 0 27 smaller of ∗ doublet meaning. 10 χ e that SM, Ξ v in of the χ tidecuplet symmetry calculated the argumen whic iso mem large, ha preliminary some hallenge c the e → en wn the an a ersal. c ysical v to e an N the for a 10 − in is in / ph w of giv are sho ha . . the 1 of e Ξ in SU(3) + univ h e 2 e Ξ b excitations ed as some y p v increase lose w Θ of and . magnitudes 2 , the admixture limit the ha denominator not )] 10, to of the whic and of 1 deca ould e that of evidence MeV in 0 G observ w w del the 2 are the large comparable ertheless, y . the + /G ed limit tend corrections with excitation 1 , . Thirdly in mo ys . 0 width w 10 and/or to orders G vibrational + G means Nev 08 98 this deca ( First, within . . Θ o allo explanation ctet 10 ortedly the 1 0 = deca rather Γ as in the 27 w these o to due through masses t a ρ = = quark ¶ This this rep 10 in explanation masses e the not preliminary mixing. the ys, as are + erge go v 1 e 10 10 than , of 8 8 ) to that y is e 100 in corrections the ] ected degenerate 1 − div ha the M M b M M estimate. deca Section. that y s π / / G / state ÷ / limit. is in [44 they only 2 Ξ Σ 10 10 exp m to deca + to tation − – ximately ould oth , Ξ Ξ rotational h 1 − rate 0 M M b this deca Ξ w 200 ∗ parameter smaller get with this 0 M M can y are 20 the Ξ should ely alternativ µ this ultiplets of e G for surprised h in – whic ( = = the w appro (mix) m this the ∼ of exactly corrections → e R deca 27 An − − difficult confirmation represen t, b − tical unlik d π ctets 27 Secondly case, urthermore, to [ K π whic − 10 y o + e. F that the + + e b Ξ is additional the of v − ery the 0 − Since iden 1 not o ∗ small, v is Ξ findings anishes ). Σ y 162 last magnitude factors Ξ degenerate v → ]. no anishes elemen t ab that → are taquarks, excitations t that → v ersal. = of are ) that case (1530) the is −− p − 10 ) [45 g the −− en deca ∗ ] g − (4.41 ( Ξ Ξ sensitiv ( Ξ p π terpretation Ξ ta hanism Γ should R yielding 9 univ in and R + [46 in this primarily that y Section, almost 0 the of to matrix ∗ elemen 2, e orders remark admixtures extremely Ξ in There mec / in t NA49 2 rate, an message b not One 1 / 2 discussed e enhancemen → NA49. momen deca is ]. 3 y t y an next w small ctet 10 − via erties b Ξ vibrational of y t as o + Ξ the the summarize trolled are b [46 2 is w matrix 0.8. Θ reads go of er, the deca consider migh argued relev CQM, an meson mixing it con M prop ev suppression e in + for e these osed w factor elemen tioned and w orted the Θ only term b the eaking, the other briefly that , this excitations that width Ho sp y with ) one rep 0.2 men prop no us 2 3 within y small that the can that reinforcing ma , offered corrections correction therefore out but it , SM. the , matrix as tly tly een g another y ys Finally Within Let leading 10 χ Λ deca (27 as Note Strictly w h / e 9 Ξ state w s 10 SM, et of it giv recen Calculating evidence This Despite than Ξ The b deca Therefore the the suc χ recen the m suggest whereas rotational limit, deca the found JHEP05(2004)002 e of of in at v an ul- the and vier and ons, only m e ha (5.1) (5.4) (5.3) (5.2) (5.5) MeV these , CQM in b + 8. ecomes hea as 2 alues state y b ctet estimate / bary umerical v 100 Θ oth discussed × 3 the o masses n e a subscripts these b h Ξ ma breaking w in 10 the found, out h. As in of the the y the eral rather ∈ are . the exotic ab If treated ould a ons e 10 27 w there Sev 27-plet, approac and for b than , . Using . masses, using in approac + more and , bary ed vier. 2 3 2 within symmetry 10 evidence ultiplet SM ) that / since 2 1 w ectroscop 3 Ξ χ I + 5 MeV MeV These m ] = Ω more SM and hea 2 2 1 Ξ harge) sp should ) χ , 27, allo P 24 3 2 est-lying 27-plet. mass = the and erc J , , on w tly SU(3) ons and 1695 2057 ) analysis, vier a (27 the 2 + 1 lo in the 2 MeV with not yp , the [19 = = in (27 Θ Σ (8 hea (h is bary 2 1 , in . 60 with , in for the − Σ Ω the 4 bary with 1 ) preliminary γ y 2 ed of t , the 2 1 used / suggested. m m , Θ in on + 3 of γ order predictions er 65 significan Ξ Θ previous , 112 (27 the 5 deca w exotic 14 tation γ a barely figure also bary M + a to tres observ to , , of state degenerate the − first the within exotic predictions. exotic ∆ a β h eing – ] 25 in is suggestions for t 112 en 1 β 2 b cen of strangeness at the of 2 Θ an [47 21 expansion − − ) Suc the giv ed t umerical wn MeV MeV + c + represen – n the α α w , a eighing the these ]. 2 1 of y encouragemen α almost N other w 2 sho from 5 b , vier ligh relev 1 / 27 7 56 56 13 1 of I found predicts ultiplet ultiplet: [45 allo ) 1 1597 is 1876 study een a e previous − + + of m In m (27 e ecify hea = π ) b w are these e corrections : : : ons SM = = refine b 2 3 excitation ) ) SM ons b (3.7 et t the χ sp Σ + 1 2 2 1 3 3 2 , 1 2 ) masses χ so further , b / w tly 0 , Θ Ω Σ + Θ 3 to isospin bary 2 3 ols Ξ (27 (10 no mass m bary the ould =2 the , b migh detailed that (27 − 1 states. m confirm onding e I ) w tations ons, sligh vide the t 2 3 masses in Θ 10 w , e : SU(3) the ( for a it ected sym the 1 w pro this a Ξ(1530) en ¶ (27 bary in previously exotic − ]), splittings these 3 2 the recen in exp the of M but 2 to the , giv corresp er, / breaking a = is made of [48 w-lying represen ∆ 3 in denotes ould the 8, inputs, 27 ev vier the ons ) lo Ξ w for S w are µ the × emphasized + of as een a section, test hea 2 3 also e tioned, where b of Ho ying , the 10 that ons bary b 10 extracted ons of e ], ligh existence / Ξ for v ∈ γ with isospins (27 ectra men 24 (see deca subscript , ha , bary that 10 bary sp the the + + comparison, recall and triplet the and exotic 3 2 and previous h [19 should Θ 27 the e + ximate. or β MeV hiral-symmetry reliable The It F W presence = note c 10 Θ since the Predictions already α, the the whic , ecify e , P 2 the J isospin exotic appro the As the I for 10 5. where suggests less of decuplet estimates of 1860 in W tiplets the sp JHEP05(2004)002 1 is is in et, Θ tly tly are the and , ) this and k that (5.7) (5.6) using + + of 2 1 Θ This sligh , left, see brac . states ers states 10 e h ( b the ) the Ξ robust, making significan 2 3 W only eac of breaking, MeV . on is the In mem the are 10 in (27, . Ξ 2 wn in quite . and ) 1860 N ) test α π < that α sho the 6 ccur is the Σ 6 o Y ultiplet is + ligh state symmetry + 10 of m states and γ Ξ γ with ) Ξ , actually the 3 2 term with + 13 (13 , ( is Θ of the SU(3) ectrum mass the Λ 1 ). 1 e ons (27 it 27 spin 3/2 56 sp states: 112 in v of 2 2 / o ) / ∗ sigma the 1 1 − Ξ + together (3.7 + N Ξ non-exotic the cancellations ab 1 2 bary 1 ¶ 1 1 ¶ , Σ order Θ 2 for 2 Ω mass 1 in 1 ]. I I 10 used the difference ( 2 / 2 ∗ / 3 ucleon − MeV 3 [20 − particular, first of N the exotic – Ξ 1 -n ectrum, partial 1 not 1 ccurs 1 of I 2 The I π at in o Σ cancellation, mass e sp 3 triplet 22 3 . ), the v parameters µ N µ that orted – e: 10 π the tens 1 2 ha tal h, the v of 1 2 (3.7 masses Σ o found rep of = = masses. the ab set of few isospin but the 10 + 10 tly ons , a 10 Θ Ξ assume 2 acciden Ξ the est I approac plot cancellation M M w bary t. e only explicitly range recen Θ an only − not − lo for and w 10 spin 1/2 and this functions parameters e 27 is ∗ righ 27 as + estimates Ξ Θ N γ 1 w did lik In Θ of as large exotic The similar , Θ M M the MeV e inputs a β . exhibit ). Σ where of 7 A w SM the . set = = , + oks , on ultiplets: as χ . than 2 3 to 5 α 2 if Ξ / for lo Θ 18 + m 3 , lines) state MeV Ξ ∆ ∆ en the ) Θ ectra = ter ) from en 2 3 our (27 3 2 1600 63 1900 1800 1700 MeV 2000 sp Ξ , this ev tak for ectrum figure the ligh in ∆ = e the (27 sp v in fitted teresting (27, The Θ ) (dashed in determine in ha + ∆ ersist 2 that, than 3 2 4: than degenerate, and est / e p is yields , 3 to w ) w Ξ h 1 2 Although It see lo (27 ter state vier , e 1 ould 10 the yielding W w whic the considerably and Figure parameters ( hea Θ illustrated plot, ligh almost order JHEP05(2004)002 2 is / 3 the and h Ξ (5.8) (5.9) state alues of 5 (5.11) (5.10) v / smaller 27 4 and whic width: Ξ 1 = the ), y but Θ suppression 0 masses the for 10 (5.8 /G the deca G 1 the of G seen the another than for tering from Indeed, is en , masses t 3 ϕ 3 ϕ already (i.e., p isospin): p fitted the bigger there 2 2 small. calculate er 0 ! has ! e , v π limit us o efficien b still B with 27 B 27 + . ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ co is to 2 let 0 0 MeV h NA49 ) G 8 10 B 5 B CQM parameters 2 3 . eraged 1 . 8 : ϕ 8 ϕ (1530) (5.8 v together − whic ∗ that a the − 27 ÷ à à 1 Ξ Ξ y 9, othesis, 6 – using in . 9 4 G or h-Gordan MeV 72 25 , 0 0 2 1 → of yp to 0 1 lines) 23 N width h 2 27 ∼ M π 6 − 2 27 – M of y Σ G 0 − F M = π ossibilit Clebsc M mass G this anishes of (solid π + p 1 (1560) 27 v π 0 8 deca summed 1 ∗ 10 = 8 − F order Ξ the 27 ons Ξ = the test 27 F = → the y SU(3) ϕ F get , (not − 27 0 8 ϕ the to Ξ e and bary 10 B 0 10 ect functions Γ w ) of B the G → deca 1 2 27 ) 27 → as , is F of to exp B consider order 27 obtain 10 the e Γ B ( of e (4.25 In w Γ of w lines) for ), width so 2 alue square / 1 v states. er, 8 similarly v ectra the therefore (4.23 and the (1530). sp the → ∗ (dashed in 2 Ξ 5), ) that, / on / 2 3 3 Moreo The en 2 ] to should . 27 non-exotic 5: = giv namely 10 note [44 (27, 0 2 or G , Altogether ying 1 F One us and ending /G the G 6. 2 + / factor, dep of where Figure Let G Θ than in deca 1 JHEP05(2004)002 , t e o ]. ]. ): y in 3 2 w the the een the has t , spin tak [19 ould [49 non- with b large small Some could unit (5.12) factor them. (5.13) of states w ucleon e . ] to (27 natural ultiplet v a is hes the oses + dated -n − but and ery m from 1 2 inevitable p y π ) [23 ha tidecuplet v Ξ ] fortuitous, assessmen date that b predict oil the y a rather a 10 h = need an 0 particles exotic an searc predicted [10 widths the sp el P of (5.11 alues, e This + 10 is M v J v deca v / in of tal y that whic ould Θ larger in masses e not phenomenological accommo ). and no a that w ha M v ed SM is exotic t e realistic exotic a e is accommo χ yielding h b do deca on the b ha a implying to somewhat done of y term , ed (5.10 fact dern erimen the to as of − 12, this ) ] N factor whic observ SM ma other ers bary masses and in can This 2 3 π mo efficien of also χ exp ] b the y , to it . Σ [45 + co should to er need the 22 2 1 wn 9 the the as del, the b , since the although . 10 , . unobserv mem ]. the determinations 1 = Ξ(27 = corrections Ξ MeV sho ], data mo for 10 [10 ersalit G er, 15 ‘partners’ s , ould for and [8 of P of Ξ 27 v mem , namely − w previous − 1 J m MeV G include and of within π although SM ) 1700 latest [14 of 10 = 2 3 χ the h-Gordan + tributions 66 NA49 + test quark , of G I predicts inertia but ratio, get width Θ lies dels, Moreo ÷ of that candidate the success , non-univ con e = the of . (27 – ligh − ], for the mo w a 1 states, 37 − SM 2 1 the + 10 Clebsc ts of results [8 hing order ) χ G Ξ total and 24 h term ∼ Θ of e mass the 1 2 diquarks = prediction Ξ(1530) hes – + N masses the suc determination second-order that limit. π the the − the the P K the imply to , (4.25 branc the 0 Σ preliminary J + soliton mass states is breaking of able momen that in p of non-trivial Searc for ound G of ), the the ++ 27 t their negativ → y y its a that the Θ = ould SM the NA49 on ectations ++ 27 t da predict predictions χ rate w small for as of eigh (4.23 Θ 27 the that exotic ucleon MeV of deca ] to w remark the w Γ instead soliton t width t used G the exp -n [8 in not the the 77 rely It the e further. π of to of e v symmetry the . ÷ with ligh strongly-b of the of successfully The en ranges en er, did ha 10 for . 41 duction the doubt complain for naiv Ξ feature e ely ev ev case giv exceed suggest hiral w with t logic 2 W pro no than c , 02 old . 1 terpretation MeV carefully taquark that requiremen ho the and CQM 0 predict of predict G than together in ensate obtain en the relativ + ortan . In p e 200 CQM widths t, The prediction calculations total to to the ered. of CQM and Θ h larger 2, w v The ter the ] almost ∼ / probably ]. , of 27 imp comp 1 suc the the [7 the ons is [23 ratio for wledge ligh used of alues examined ties disco to tested accoun an ectra, of the of v h ould strange get widths. rather e spin ons kno predictions, sp bary that w un een v so to ts e uc hing refuted. term een is b w in to There Dynamical Similarly is the m ha b test ey e Summary or our N bary k v 2 e π een or ersions / arian hallenges uncertain consequence ha of exotic exhibits ligh are range. Σ existence has c A v width of b branc 6. W This exotic 27-plet v F 50 one where increase These this 3 and JHEP05(2004)002 e y ]. Ξ is N of of of of of in til ell an π in- or- the the the the w it [56 that Σ dels, This than un y ccurs deca of b colour ecause o ositiv imp as predic- mixing further and success mo b alues er, p yielding ] exotic then It v limit on is ev flexible enhancing Therefore, 0, [50 e. w suppression existence an ucleon it comparison, larger for realizes most The . conspiracy olving predictions -n y indicating structure → a Ho of partly foundations v soliton a measured π used In another ery taquarks couplings. dels based quite 0 factors, diquarks in soliton . v prediction tuitiv the that one r ], cancellation successful en as as ers is corrections. o parit in the mo ossible the p the if een b w of ) hand, w [21 p the 2 s e b t t GeV small, soliton ossibly and of these size the in of del m p small ( ulations. CQM, eing er suppressed mem of one predicted mixing. ligh erator ], as hanisms oidable O b not mass the mo quark smaller v other ev 2000 w with ecially is is dels, the 15 the to op + a w form negativ er’ , mec Θ soliton y to Another the the of una e b still in the esp date e mo alues some from ho confirmed ertheless, v due dels v ons [14 estimate tation e ]. of e, prediction milestone is if of an v in ga the t v width ork far deca On mo naiv o Nev h a group-theoretical 1830 [54 is ha e ey y larger MeV bary is ts ]. predict . k ery ab order, MeV in calculations ‘remem of ] sets as 50 v Indeed, recen the [33 calculations whic een accommo oured w the ed ersions represen deca dels er, v rules GeV [52 framew w v v suppression MeV tall out in 1800 11 to fa + ev arise et exotic to disco . and – tal. a mo t SM constan ab collectiv ery constitute, Other 77 ] b w 5 Θ w ratios the term χ v 2 of 2000 of , 15 25 ]. ho rules 2 ecause unpro some teractions, 1 er, the elo discussed due the that , as of b [8 – and the b G accuracy in G ould artificially absen h, ev ties ranges of NA49 phenomenological disco an selection er, and in w range figure + [14 acciden soliton w en 45 lie within spins sum y is dynamical del ev Θ the ho b in one that whic the w giv h states and and effects partly mo already een 1830 ed strong MeV hiral wide ] is, NA49 and the osed to Ho k whose c dified w e uncertain SM CQM means QCD seen find are v whic , et χ It [53 and of the orted lac in otherwise remaining een predictions the e freedom. for mo b − e couplings the the ell. suitable 1860 ha t quarks ], prop no b w + ts factors Ω close w W rep of and e of [8 the et in y Θ the the een w ] tities tly b . they b parities ears as of lie can 3 b in states, degenerate y the within some of width p of [51 the include e alence As t If fit mass er, striking around as correlated v v y mass the 20 of quan recen of argumen hallenges. ev that degrees not SU(3)-breaking states ha c dated Ξ y ecause of w the the exotic del. nearly correlations, free deca b + last factor do een dels, a ailable t most spin ho announcemen in b v Ξ o tal the exact. w to masses dels man a mo t erlap wness ers w mo consisten ]. new v t the y that is, b is understanding the o b has mo and calculations cancellation and group-theoretical quark space t partly [55 calculations has er um couplings are with accommo narro ]. of dating the v n recen y the narro additional erimen ] ], 10 o limit, masses a del the (3) soliton Ξ of reduces [9 [29 soliton SM een [23 10 for exp of een y spatial y to One Quark The The parit presen measuremen mo phase b χ SU CQM Ξ phenomenological hanism These this t w del lattice ducing the tiquark da 11 ultiplet et arying hiral need tion width v exotic the the c tro cancellation the the and cancellation parit the suppressed mec the due has mo b as an accommo m In the the tan to our of the encouraging term JHEP05(2004)002 e y y a of of of er w wn ust the the the h w last ctet ould , from limit quite m some o do y deca to deca states width w of small- exotic nearly suc rigidly b widths soliton serious 1 othesis. is mixing. the another ation ation a decuplet an decuplet y of , discussed Θ of the estimated the the yp The higher is + the suffer there to to only h oses e existence er of whole and soliton Θ breaks v p deca CQM already w of ys observ the widths separately tation them it ha to decuplet , seen this the the than first ork the the factors e an a een e ordinary small is deca though, of w ecause widths to the tations. non-observ e b b W to suppress b t 0 as v elonging in y the Therefore to + o b predictions isotriplet rid Surely the del is tization widths among to in gets Θ is represen exactly the t has 3. ab ys rather correlated confirm y y in / deca mo get the large. easily 2 to tly presen er, to t ligh one quan represen − correction Ξ(1860) ultiplied That here, deca the hold. ) place. ev deca deca the e MeV one ely 3 2 m doublet terpreted . the = There Where w due can ely + in comparable the in e dels n and of anishes for in iso still order can v Ho first presen e tidecuplet v tidecuplet coheren − to (27, couplings, /µ b Ξ mo ha could in p an and they an relativ dels? relativ µ the collectiv the e tens hand, w factors discussed Ξ(1860) due ones, a and the w tend in are the tidecuplet the mo of ho t could ximation. understanding states. of the ], of and 10 small 10 few e obtained found immediately an Ξ(1860) not coupling soliton [8 and – y 1 other e ons a predictions 27 e y predictions for that b are the individual v the Whether for In = Ξ out 26 enhanced. appro and found, Unlik NA49 −− ol e soliton the exotic in deca ha del ys del bary – ? just e wing deca ust correction y to the the e b tly whether ∆Σ b tidecuplet e of m corrections 10 prediction dels existence mo etc. mo w On the the ] rigid of of ollo unlik deca enhancemen to an 3, ctet dels. the 27 er F y ), so / excluded mo 18 o as evidence the Ξ the 2 5 b w y 5 Ξ(1860) , e the mo , ere orted tation, decuplet b e ultiplets that the these to ons, b 5 as of effectiv coheren = w 28 these robust ] is of , m width soliton ] to , rep ond ossible A is en large, (35, 27 of Ξ the h theoretical g also p the bary soliton ositiv [46 ey e CQM. , ev 2 estimates [27 10 tally ), tly a p b b / ordinary in soliton figure [9 y quite total states 2 3 Ξ ation 27 3 represen b predicted exotics whic another terpretation. the and ctet. to case to ) corrections. of = o ter applied in 2 3 the useful widths recen with with et unreliable I for from e results: (27, large y en , cannot Inciden rule − b of reliable this observ an exotics other the harged π ery h it explained ratios of another c found see literature (27, states v h del in y width arious + , no get more not ) MeV can er, v with the a 0 predicted ties. excitations taquark an tation all 3 2 e. but ∗ suc mo rather whic ery are can ev the the excitations v together urthermore, 66 the to , is er, v Ξ en mass o y the w F er, p ÷ ev Again ould for in to the degenerate that sa ys, (27, → ab one ev w Ho w prediction there soliton naturally 37 disco 8. quark − w limit to to of er, while order ho starting represen factors text. is As terestingly v ∼ , uncertain deca discussed to Ho ons. ons, + y In In Are Therefore, If, binations nearly e . vibrational dels. ++ 27 rotational Θ the 10 v hard robust 27 Θ e elonging hallenges appropriate These large ha these of the mo bary widths c com Ξ(1860) Ξ in a discussed bary Moreo deca famous degenerate of soliton Γ is b similar issue. suggest states b rotating excitations, of exotic discussion JHEP05(2004)002 , .). , d B the in con- ; 31 del orted CQM (1984) Phys. al Phys. States- require . (M.P unifie , already D mo , 600 eriment Phys. with also 35 the A del 233 supp soliton Glob 24 ev. exp are will is ; oton R spin-parities al B mo is oth pr 57 Nucl. it 127; ts (1985) United 043 b gic , Skyrme 2419 (1984) if ork N the versus of olo Phys. Phys. the w the 256 , of 10 ge- ts Skyrme 236 (1979) top t masses, del partners (1961) P03B in . Ξ B del (1996) lar elopmen B 2 mo the from the Nucl. spin the t mo 160 in ons 11 , t the dev C02-98CH10886 of of elemen presen A260 Phys. B the A of Phys. h ultiplet dels gran nucle gran m Skyrme ond. masses DE-A mo a The and 556; Skyrme . of These Nucl. L Phys. whic that y Phys. dinates ; , 1969; Nucl. b c. ]. , extension or under the ered in d. pion o No. 422 hep-ph/0311087 v So c quark h erties of , [57 ork, (1962) Nucl. with Mo cuplet ; attering: part Y Understanding , op y oy. with de sc J. symmetry and SU(3) 31 del? pr R in ctive QCD, tract 713 – (1983) formulae le al N e del Jerusalem. ctrum undisco mo New SM. c. e Researc and ¯ ol o Int. ansion K χ c 27 Con mo wicz, , sp Phys. 223 Pr hep-ph/9802298 Chir Static orted together soliton – lo mass exp , , (1985) ctet ectroscop tific , their and B quark and o al + del sp (BSF), ory N and aryon supp Nucl. under 1/N Θ 258 solitons b aryons: chir erturbativ Skyrme , mo and Benjamin, Praszaà K the oles. b Scien rˆ Witten, as , Phys. B aryon CQM Karliner, the n, b t w the N the M. The π ; E. del for The ons . field in of flavor hadron M. non-p of onstituent ge- of aryons solitons the c Mo b 552 e Nucl. e ar and Phys. ar e and of in , of del authored oundation bary . as 1991 L a and F ery the ; . ak thr (M.K.) and Nappi, Mattis, ds v mo w significan era . quark-soliton of Karliner, een as Nucl. Baryons Quark 137 309 us (1983) adia, nonline y b Ellis Nappi No , algebr al (1986) exotic ]. Energy M. C.R. W of Committee disco ersions M.P ts A end del new Baryons pla Equivalenc v metho The 228 of Science mesons ent 34 has ; J.R. Skyrme Chir a y C.R. mo M.A. (1984) (1988) and t and of , one and B S.R. of The 19 ; Witten, D v, these Baryons in State ma al curr of edee, tob, E. of dsky 147 206 simple ev. ono ory Skyrme, h and of 2833 chir R Phys. SM thesis uscript Mattis Manohar, B B eigel, confirmed Mazur, Adkins, Close, Adkins the (1984) olish Bro χ Kokk . also cts usher wledgmen Chem Karliner . Diak e W P Guadagnini, Jain syn Binational .O. ett. ett. man Departmen hep-ph/9509398 researc widths the SU(3) 248 M. S. L M.P A.V. (1985) M. L 109 G.S. Nucl. field asp Phys. G.S. See [ F.E. E. P T.H.R. S.J. H. D. J.J. The kno the new y [5] [7] [4] [6] [2] [3] [1] hallenging Ac The and This a c U.S. firmed, and References Israel b JHEP05(2004)002 at , in C om ]; fr ow J. 67 state, lisions into +1 ]; avity state ositive ol exclusive ; , ]. p c gr narr = the new df in a S (2003) to Nucl. Phys. AIP in of entaquark dels on diction aryon aying p , e b c 1987, of e with aryon v.p 91 b 213 mo 234 arb pr de e with no 1 , Eur. tom. aryon e 1715 ow, masses, b SU(3) , ett. A ka = CLAS . and on-c exotic ; L p.531; | hep-ex/0307018 esonanc +1 (2004) [ (2003) om S r gy arb Che angeness aryon Krak´ | r an c esonanc eigenstates b hep-ex/0311046 aryons: ev. . , quark formation = [ with r F b (2003) r/ diquarks Phys. esonanc R hep-ex/0301020 [ r in 1987, as S ow , 585 for 575 d: of for 66 ons F ina e aryon ]. enta-quark B eds., B 252001 e b p exotic narr ore, aryon em using Phys. b 032001 ositive-str er + aryon a exotic , evisite article /s p an b ett. actions 012002 +1 a ett. cuplet anomalies r Nucl. Z p SU(3) deuter 2; L L phenomenolo = aub of an hep-ex/0401024 for Evidenc opy of (2003) e/f ow hep-ex/0307083 the in Evidenc T Singap del , the S inter e and , of (2004) es: and osc tom. of an, 91 mo G. (2003) hep-ph/0307243 anti-de of Phys. A narr y Phys. (2003) ctr , elsa 92 and , entaquarks tific, , setup tsev, e p 4 of 91 ett. five-quark at sp otons and , del L Evidenc hep-ph/9703373 – ett. [ esonanc quark a ]; pr for Phys. neutrino r L Exotic Scien Stepan ett. harmonics mo , Observation Sci. Observation ev. ∗ L Kuban Skyrmions ctor 28 al., duction aryons in SVD-2 v, for R 305 S. b del o om Z Observation ev. o exotic – entaquark et Observation al., fr orld on ad. p al., R ev. olar Observation dete mo ak c nuclei R W Gotsman al., et and with M.A. A et N and al., e Observation Skyrme oly Phys. al., http://www.desy.d onstituent et (1997) E. K etian P photopr , c X et Phys. , Monop and ]. eds., v, et the al., actions vsky vsky low-lying saphir , an al on Phys. 1533-MeV e o Maltman, e y r , and observation workshop et The of in ano with Barmin Airap hep-ex/0307088 ]; M.V. ar the schematic ano A359 [ on K. wicz oton Barth Diquarks aryons 70-GeV/c ne the Mongolian lo A b A. pr deuter C ]. Kubaro Kubaro J. Nak and Chek quasi-r Stepan Dothan, at 543 c. V.V. with of and Aleev neutr masses o v duction for lisions the the Lipkin, V. V. S. S. T. in o Dolgolenk Y. c. mass A. ol Pr erimental o on Praszaà c om , del Zahed, etro excitations om om Physik Wilczek, ]; ]; ]. Pentaquark Pr fr oration, + P (2004) H.J. ; . fr fr and Exp I. actions oration, hep-ph/9804260 M. mo A.G. with duction [ Z. hadr oration, F. K o Jennings photopr V. , e oration, oration, oration, oration, oration, adial al., and 698 in GeV/c an, wicz, hep-ex/0309042 wicz, oration, and inter and for collab v, [ in 391 R y and 1528-MeV collab lo 2 et c. , . duction collab ak o B.K. ek duction duction 4 hep-ph/0307341 o o pA ono of [ o o collab collab collab collab 682 collab photopr solitons Pr esonanc collab = ury Asrat ˙ eigel, Jaffe in r zab ogo Biedenharn 0 in (1998) also al Praszalo Karliner Praszaà (1540) 0 p Diak s W T Sh dictions Je P 15–34. angeness 0 e mass s + + hep-ex/0312044 hep-ex/0304040 hep-ph/0308114 Skyrme-Witten R. pr p. a ZEUS at [ 232003 hep-ph/0308286 E. photopr K SVD pK HERMES hep-ph/0310270 CLAS (2004) A.E. Conf. Θ Θ CLAS SAPHIR photopr CLAS chir [ M. M str A2 photo-pr [ D. H. M. L.C R.L. See DIANA M. LEPS [8] [9] [14] [13] [15] [16] [12] [10] [11] JHEP05(2004)002 ; ]. the a ; of +1 exotic Exp. The Phys. (2004) N NJL Phys. , ; π = J. , 042003 ore, soliton pion, 69 we , K and S del c (1540), attering aessler, a a al D + F an N sc mo Arndt, dels SU(3) c / of moment Θ aryon as data 1 n b . A. chir Singap (2004) ev. attering mo d π exotic + hep-ph/0307370 2 R hep-ph/9403314 sc and skyrmion [ R.A. , Θ − of 92 quark om with and orte n hep-ph/0310026 tific, quantization and fr = ; + al overlap ep , ]; 485 the solitonic and r he on e ett. attering soliton Phys. kaon K magnetic Q hep-ph/0307357 ; L 649 , aryons sc of , chir , a the Scien al b ctive the 2 the on e n le analysis ev. nucle − ctor Θ Gutsc dels gic e + in of attering entaquarks (1996) ol R state multiplet c p orld with = esonanc ative K orkman sc olo mo T. r the (1992) ]. hep-ex/0401014 natur W (1540) 53 S ]; therein. isove W , the + GWU oton top on of on exotic width D Phys. ]; ]; Θ a pr esonanc 548 erturb exotic aryon ed., in in , r and b p of R.L. Is ]. soliton hep-ph/0308073 ev. the vitskij, exotic A nucle a ossible [ , low-lying nucle om the o p R erties 27 hep-ph/0312213 SPS G al the fr arth + heptaquark on , an of ]; op references states in (1543) K vsky to a soliton the in (1540) family pr o of chir del ange entaquarks? + kaon Lyub Phys. + p – Phys. ]. as Θ 011503 Rastelli, spin Z esults Holzw and mo On , 2 as CERN r limits hep-ph/0309305 om ]; ] . [ 29 a New states − aryon L. Strak fr terms ctions V.E. nucl-th/0308012 Axial b del asinio G. [ e Nucl. – ∗ ; The non-str the = of , ge: hep-ph/0111066 765 hep-ph/9312279 orkman, , e, [ [ 264 Θ mo (1540) I.I. e (2004) e orr S e, and W lar at ek c soliton + hep-ph/0312326 putative Mateu, del ; [ e ek sigma Θ Inoue, 467 69 Observation an, aryons ther Exotic Go ; mo v b erimental NJL soliton ang V. 042201 62 151 the hep-ph/0311245 Go e (1993) a R.L. ther Pentaquark [ on D T. h, (2004) r P K. al., quark Kobushkin, . The 110–115 e lisions Influenc A Exp on r K. Ouy and vic hep-ph/0304058 ev. ol et al [ and 555 A . (1994) definitely v, A. c otational see: 684 nucle SU(3) R Pentaquark Nambu-Jona-L r P hep-ph/0309243 hep-ph/0311275 and (2003) 27-plet (2004) (1993) [ [ elio Skyrme is and A ]; c M.M. 011501 chir B Alt v, 433 ) Oset hep-ph/0308230 (2002) Skyrmion Krein, v 325 and (3) N Kahana, 68 vsky rilling, enig, , oton o / N o wicz The Kop 586 302 T C. 1 E. the Marques, Phys. er as B W pr D G. SU 16 omments meson ak Nussino term lo from , c Phys. B B 052201 035207 Phys. S.H. ab SU( solitonic S. (2004) ]. of S. al., width oly Ma, (2003) om on F estimates, ev. Strak ett. V.B. nucl-th/0311030 Klebano G.H. and are The P fr oton t L R G.M. , ett. ett. et 69 the and 97 sigma The and L L M. pr Praszaà Some Nucl. and oration, I.I. es v nucl-th/0311020 Baryon Nucl. ers nucle and al., their B.Q. , and in I.R. (2003) (2004) D , b , in and v, Newslett. on recen a M. M.V. bauer her et Phys. Phys. analysis e e? 247; hep-ph/0312041 68 69 aryons ev. um [ , , Phys. and Phys. Phys. b collab d state n R Gothe p. , , PiN Fisc and Arndt, Cahn Christo Kahana alliser, alliser D D u nucle on esonanc ctions Llanes-Estrada, , other r e or. Borisyuk, Blotz Blotz, W Itzhaki, W Blotz, W del del date Bicudo Nussino Haiden + ev. ev. . or ound aryons orr esonanc esonanc hep-ex/0310014 1992, [ D.E. kaon A. pion data F.J. formulation r b F Up R The r R R.A. nucle understand 077501 b A. Exotic R.N. B. c Phys. mo mo R.W. C.V. J. Z H.G. H. P These D. N. NA49 H. S. A. [21] [22] [17] [23] [24] [18] [20] [19] [26] [25] JHEP05(2004)002 a . B ev. , in , c. QCD or. p R 66 Phys. o Phys. − exotic c , (1987) ett. π D ons L N The spin 301 Phys. (Pr e? of ∆, vertex d , er 78 g. cuplet? Phys. B ge- ev. 074030 tub ge 94 o , , R the hyp lar Pr Phys. quark aryon ctrum not , , of char of Phys. b e antide mass Phys. hep-ph/0401187 Phys. olours sp del or (2004) ay and dels: Phys. c , c ]. or. e the , mo and de 69 of mo erties del the angian exotic ays tub aryon Nucl. The c gatively Nucl. b pion-skyrmion op er , D and mo + , the lagr de om g. ne pr Θ o del physics fr width the the ev. soliton ) soliton Pr R and the numb + mo of n the , ; Θ π in masses and soliton of onstant ( ge . dilemma: c σ ers article quark al and lar . p the Phys. hep-ph/9910282 421 omagnetic [ al , oupling at of Skyrme quark aryon chir on c semileptonic QCD b ctr memb skyrmion-pion chir A oupling + (3) ele on the c quantization . skyrmions light Θ (1984) ansion in er eview the 114006 SU in . – c ukawa on R sigma-term onsistency 464; and c exp the Y N Determination Hyp hep-ph/0312191 missing The om 140 multiplets 30 c c the Comment on , ak al., fr of ]. ]; e, ]. ge- h, N N otating – nucle B Θ(1543) to r aryon v, (2000) the hep-ph/0310134 et ek b o We lar Skyrmion ]. ge- (1986) ge- , e of nucle ow aryon ak ]. 61 ett. Go ach ar b pion lar lar ara L for action o Wycec 75 gen e oly D o K. narr + Wise, exotic ]. P pion S. and The Θ Mattis, appr inter dels, + ev. quantization ibid. . hep-ph/0312346 pion-skyrmion . hydr Hagiw Phys. and M. Wher Exotic R Θ the of The , and , unication; mo M.B. 444 v, v, determinations K. new . of v, M.P otor hep-ph/0309208 hep-ph/0309111 , the quantization hep-ph/9404274 and e [ [ [ aryons wicz A ukawa b and pionic v etro etro Phys. width lo of Y Scadron, hep-ph/0309203 comm elation [ erratum and , P P oup r soliton 124 175 hep-ph/0011049 surviving Loiseau da (1988) [ rigid-r action om 5816 etro the Nussino ate oximation V. V. ]. The al Gr fr P . . 212 Ando, oton B. of the width M.D. Exotic hep-ph/0311230 of Praszaà S. a Nonrigid 108 [ Extr pr Sono Non-lattic 215 . t V. priv eiman K. appr 056002 and and Chir Hughes (2004) (2004) r a On wicz, M. 96 B (1994) and H. v, v v, v The D al and the . length J. lo (1986) and ylitsa, hep-ph/0312376 , helde, validity 578 581 50 of (2001) ono ono ono ono eitzer, Ericson, wyler, ett. , ger-T 010001 601 ob anishing (2004) 75 L w Kim, er Bugg Cohen, B B D Jaffe, P h V (2004) ersc abu the ticle Uehara, Praszaà ; Diak Diak Diak Diak V Casher Y Dorey Leut 69 Sc Bijnens, attering ev. ar .V. . ett. ett. ontent aryons hep-ph/0310221 R Phys. semiclassic 583 H. Phys. 984 sc hep-ph/0310212 Goldb c b Suppl.) (2002) L (1988) D. A. P D hep-ph/0404212 [ and L M. H.-C. J. M. T.E.O. H. N. P D.V. D. D. P H. T.D. R.L. D. [35] [38] [36] [37] [39] [31] [34] [33] [40] [30] [41] [29] [32] [27] [42] [28] JHEP05(2004)002 , B . of ett. , L B limit , ett. arity ; L p (2004) ange + arity ett. p (1540) soliton K L Phys. QCD + . entaquark , entaquarks − e f p of B35 p the e 232002 Θ Phys. . 035208 , Nonstr ositive + , skyrmion pd ]; p of e Phys. the SU(3) the lattic , in rule ja. the ow of of ]; states Polon. (2003) the nucl-ex/0312019 di (2004) om analysis , gy . fr of and explanation narr sum orkman, hep-ph/0312236 ches aryon 91 determine b /ka 69 , moments ar . W ly ) Phys. state ks wave ons se D al ett. duction limit ; o L QCD al cta ossible hep-ph/0312369 entaquark R.L. lisions ev. Pr hadr p p ; A ]; , hep-ph/9505328 ev. R [ natur ol k/t the , a Θ(1540 c of R 2003, Partial quark ays magnetic and ambiguities : ar Phenomenolo A c + in hep-ph/0312083 om v. 415 entaquark the [ ]; erner, entaquark de p opy fr Θ p Phys. aqu + unambiguously an, an, hep-ph/0401083 and No aryons W to vsky , Phys. b , Θ nt o osc 291 to , ++ ade the for K. Pentaquark hep-lat/0310014 orkman, d pe Θ ctr (1995) the of aryon , e asc ; ]. onstituent hep-ph/0401049 a W b aryon cts c Nazary Nazary c – Strak QCD b artner e , of exotic Masses 03/ Sp and acs, p hep-ph/0312344 (2004) hep-ph/0307396 Quantization 354 961 orkshop, v + V. V. [ for metho in ve ∗ 31 , of osp I.I. aryon to, to, R.L. width W Θ The e, entaquarks B b Θ Ko – A ch p Pr exotic arity v, 111 chi ek e, 101 2 and and p ays o actions ar ow Pierog a, / c u, +1 and of hep-lat/0309090 ett. ek ar topin topin 3 (1992) states lisions [ ak Go 2003 ee ee Se ]. L de T.G. W the T. = exotic ol er = width Go inter narr Penta-quark c oly ar/ 46 ]. ]. e San San Phys. K. in S Kw Kw 070 J (2003) Hosak P a, the nd and K. ow S.L. Rop D hep-ph/9806431 E. E. [ Phys. or. The asur A. helin, oton and le Ok of , H.J. H.J. taquark The 573 Juengst, e ev. aking pr 49 and me exotic and M.V. entaquark Narr e and and The gamma en Aic Katz R del L.D. (2003) M. /ca p Systematics B and P br of to v, g. J. ab ]. atab mo o 11 ks oton H.G. Lipkin, . Close, and artners ett. S.D. Blotz W (3) Pr (1999) pr p Carone, Carone, L hep-ph/0401072 Phys. ral Sorba, ]. [ Hic , JLab How Liu, Arndt, gamma , study Mellado . ]; T. SU A. Azimo in . . H.J. Giannini Giannini Doi hep-ph/0311258 hep-ph/0309271 P F.E. e [ [ dor, at Phys. Wilczek, K. soliton 647 B. al., o 303 C.D. C.D. and T. F oration, Phys. F. F.M. gy Y.I. R.A. and A et and wicz, wicz, wicz, , 278 167 attic and state talk Z. M.M. M.M. unitarity L lo attering lo lo Understanding quark entaquark and her, sc Ener ama, p (2004) collab u, or, er, er, al Phys. Thomas, cuplet hep-ph/0402038 + Arndt, [ Carlson, Carlson, on Zh hep-ph/0312325 (2004) (2004) Hyslop, other Dudek Θ Bleic Praszaà Praszaà Praszaà Karliner , Kadija, Bijk Jaffe Bijk Hanhart Buccella Csik 586 High chir Sasaki, Armstrong, Sugiy + entaquark nucl-th/0312126 hep-ph/0307345 nucle www.jlab.org/int 1625 antide CLAS 583 Θ hep-ph/0310281 hep-ph/0312380 [ R. J. [ 581 and S. J. B C. the S. M. Nucl. annihilations M. p of K. R. J.S. R. C.E. M. J.J. F. F. C.E. S.L. M. R.A. M. A.W. [45] [46] [49] [47] [50] [44] [48] [54] [51] [53] [52] [55] [43] [56] [57] JHEP05(2004)002 at duction o pr ]. entaquark p for cts e osp Pr hep-ph/0401115 – [ w, 62 32 – Marlo (2004) D.R. 587 and B v ett. L Klebano Phys. , I.R. wder, factories Bro meson T.E.