THE QUARTERLY REVIEW of Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE QUARTERLY REVIEW of Biology Volume 91, No. 4 December 2016 THE QUARTERLY REVIEW of Biology PATTERNS AND PROCESSES IN NOCTURNAL AND CREPUSCULAR POLLINATION SERVICES Renee M. Borges* Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012 India e-mail: [email protected] Hema Somanathan Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram Kerala 695016 India e-mail: [email protected] Almut Kelber Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University 22362 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author. keywords aridity, crepuscular pollination, dawn, dusk, nocturnal pollination network, water stress abstract Night, dawn, and dusk have abiotic features that differ from the day. Illumination, wind speeds, turbulence, and temperatures are lower while humidity may be higher at night. Nocturnal pollination oc- curred in 30% of angiosperm families across 68% of orders, 97% of families with C3, two-thirds of fam- The Quarterly Review of Biology, December 2016, Vol. 91, No. 4 Copyright © 2016 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved. 0033-5770/2016/9104-0001$15.00 389 390 THE QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY Volume 91 ilies with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), and 71% dicot families with C4 photosynthesis. Despite its widespread occurence, nocturnal pollination occurs in more families with xerophytic adaptations than helophytes or mesophytes, suggesting that nocturnal flowering is primarily an adaptation to water stress since flowering is a water-intensive process. We propose the arid or water stress hypothesis for nocturnal flowering suggesting that plants facing water stress in a habitat (e.g., deserts) or a habitat stratum (e.g., upper canopy for epiphytes) gain a selective advantage by nocturnal flowering by reducing water loss through evapotranspiration, leading to larger flowers that provide more nectar or other resources, to sup- port pollinators with higher rewards. Contrary to the wide taxonomic occurrence of nocturnal flowering, few animal taxa serve as nocturnal pollinators. We discuss the sensory and physiological abilities that enable pollinator movement, navigation, and detection of flowers within the nocturnal temporal niche and present a unified framework for investigation of nocturnal flowering and pollination. Introduction Nocturnal Pollination OLLINATION is a process in which Patterns in the Angiosperms Pa stationary plant exchanges gametes Since there has not been a review of noc- with other plants or with itself through the turnal/crepuscular pollination systems af- action of abiotic agents such as the wind or ter Baker (1961), there is a lot of ground biotic agents that range in size from minute to cover. We followed the classification of gall midges to large primates. Most plants angiosperms prepared by the Angiosperm are metabolically active during the day when Phylogeny Group (APG III; Bremer et al. the important reactions of photosynthesis 2009) and the linear sequence of plant occur. The wind is strongest during the day, families in Haston et al. (2009). We did an and it appears that the majority of pollinat- exhaustive search of Google Scholar using ing animal taxa are also active during the a combination of keywords that included day. If this is the case, then most pollina- plant families, and such keywords as noctur- tion should occur during the day and noc- nal pollination, night, evening, crepuscular, turnal pollination should be the exception. matinal, as well as keywords for known noc- What, then, are the factors that facilitate turnal/crepuscular pollinators such as bats, the origin and maintenance of nocturnal beetles, moths, and nocturnal mammals. For pollination? plant traits that were not considered in the The purpose of this review is severalfold. papers we reviewed, we also consulted Watson First, it will document nocturnal pollination and Dallwitz (1992; http://delta-intkey.com). patterns in the angiosperms. Second, it will We have taken the caveats mentioned in this present features of the physical environ- online resource seriously and have made in- ment that characterize the night (includ- dependent checks in the primary literature ing dawn and dusk). Third, it will elaborate wherever possible. We also consulted Ste- on factors that make nocturnal pollination vens (2001; http://www.mobot.org/mobot an advantage to plants. Fourth, it will docu- /research/apweb) for plant traits and for ment the animal taxa involved in nocturnal determining the family affiliation of all gen- pollination and review the special features era with nocturnal/crepuscular pollination that enable the activity of nocturnal polli- especially since several genera have been re- nators given the physical conditions of the assigned to families based on recent phyloge- night. Finally, it will lay out new hypotheses netic information. to fuel future investigations into this fasci- We score pollination to be truly nocturnal nating field. Considering the vast scope of and/or crepuscular (active during dawn or this subject, this review is intended as the dusk) if there is evidence that pollinators beginning of a synthesis toward a better un- are attracted to the flowers during noctur- derstanding of how and why nocturnally nal and/or crepuscular hours, and if there flowering plants and their nocturnal polli- is reasonable evidence of pollen transfer. nators occupy such a special temporal niche. We do not include some systems, for exam- December 2016 NOCTURNAL AND CREPUSCULAR POLLINATION 391 ple, brood site pollination by thrips where only the Acorales and the Petrosaviales did it is clear that the thrips are attracted to not have any families with nocturnal pollina- the flowers in large numbers during the tion, although the other orders had represen- day and they continue to be present in the tation of this trait. In the other “clades,” there flowers during the night. Similarly, we in- is no evidence for nocturnal pollination in clude thermogenic pollination systems as the following orders: Ceratophyllales, Troch- being nocturnal only if there is evidence odendrales, Buxales, Gunnerales, Dilleniales, that the attraction to the heat-producing Vitales, Fagales, Picramniales, and Garryales. flowers is during the crepuscular/noctur- In the following orders, pollination systems nal hours; for example, while Aristolochi- are unknown in some or all families, so the aceae and Rafflesiaceae are thermogenic presence of nocturnal pollination cannot be families (Thien et al. 2009), there is no determined: Berberidopsidales, Huerteales, evidence that the flies are attracted to the Bruniales, and Paracryphiales. Across orders, flowers during the night itself. Similarly, Magnoliales, Pandanales, Arecales, Zingibe- Hydnoraceae includes thermogenic trap rales, Myrtales, Gentianales, and Escalloniales blossoms, but the odor that attracts beetles (represented by only one family) had the is produced during the day and no noctur- highest percentage (at least 60%) of families nal visitors have yet been observed (Bolin with nocturnal pollination (Table 1). It must et al. 2009). Also, in Nelumbonaceae, there be remembered that our scoring of nocturnal is no evidence of nocturnal attraction by pollination is at the family level; some orders beetles, which are the major pollinators, and clades have many more families than oth- although the flowers are thermogenic (Li ers, and this factor must be considered when and Huang 2009). This is in contrast to the evaluating the phylogenetic occurrence of thermogenic Araceae, e.g., Amorphophallus, nocturnal pollination. which begin to emit odor at dusk (Punekar Using Phylomatic (Webb and Donoghue and Kumaran 2010). 2005; http://www.phylodiversity.net/phylo Of the 413 families recognized in the matic), we constructed a phylogeny for the APG III classification, 113 families had spe- 413 APG III angiosperm families and lo- cies with nocturnal pollination, 37 families cated the nocturnal/crepuscular families have unknown pollination mechanisms, and on the obtained phylogenetic tree, which 263 families have no evidence of nocturnal was visualized using the program FigTree pollination (Table 1, see Appendixes 1 and (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/; 2 available at http://www.journals.uchicago Figure 1). The value of good phylogenies is .edu/loi/qrb). Therefore 113/376, or ap- essential to any analysis on functional traits proximately one-third of angiosperm fam- (Hinchliff et al. 2015). As the figure shows, ilies, whose pollination sys tems are known, nocturnal pollination occurs throughout have species with nocturnal pollination. This the tree of angiosperms and does not appear is likely to be a conservative estimate since to be restricted to any particular groups, most studies on pollination are conducted whether early or more recent. With its wide on day-flowering species. At a higher taxo- distribution, nocturnal pollination does not nomic level, at least 42/61 = 69% of orders appear to be restricted to particular types (with designated families) have species with of flowers. Is it possible then to understand nocturnal pollination (Table 1; excludes all what types of processes may have given rise orders marked with a “?”). This indicates the to nocturnal pollination? We therefore ex- wide taxonomic occurrence of nocturnal amine the abiotic environment that is char- pollination, presumably in some cases, due acteristic of the night since pollinators that to convergent evolution. use this temporal niche must have abilities Examining these trends phylogenetically, to function
Recommended publications
  • Dipterocarpaceae)
    DNA Sequence-Based Identification and Molecular Phylogeny Within Subfamily Dipterocarpoideae (Dipterocarpaceae) Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) at Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Büsgen Institute Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology Georg-August-Universität Göttingen By Essy Harnelly (Born in Banda Aceh, Indonesia) Göttingen, 2013 Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey Referee : Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey Co-referee : Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft Date of Disputation : 09.01.2013 2 To My Family 3 Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey for accepting me as his PhD student, for his support, helpful advice and guidance throughout my study. I am very grateful that he gave me this valuable chance to join his highly motivated international working group. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft and Prof. Dr. Raphl Mitlöhner, who agreed to be my co-referee and member of examination team. I am grateful to Dr. Kathleen Prinz for her guidance, advice and support throughout my research as well as during the writing process. My deepest thankfulness goes to Dr. Sarah Seifert (in memoriam) for valuable discussion of my topic, summary translation and proof reading. I would also acknowledge Dr. Barbara Vornam for her guidance and numerous valuable discussions about my research topic. I would present my deep appreciation to Dr. Amarylis Vidalis, for her brilliant ideas to improve my understanding of my project. My sincere thanks are to Prof. Dr. Elizabeth Gillet for various enlightening discussions not only about the statistical matter, but also my health issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Correlates of the Evolution of Pitcher Traits in the Genus Nepenthes (Caryophyllales)
    applyparastyle "body/p[1]" parastyle "Text_First" Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2018, 123, 321–337. With 5 figures. Keeping an eye on coloration: ecological correlates of the evolution of pitcher traits in the genus Nepenthes (Caryophyllales) KADEEM J. GILBERT1*, JOEL H. NITTA1†, GERARD TALAVERA1,2 and NAOMI E. PIERCE1 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37, E-08003, Barcelona, Spain †Current address: Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, 305-0005, Japan Received 20 August 2017; revised 10 November 2017; accepted for publication 10 November 2017 Nepenthes is a genus of carnivorous pitcher plants with high intra- and interspecific morphological diversity. Many species produce dimorphic pitchers, and the relative production rate of the two morphs varies interspecifically. Despite their probable ecological importance to the plants, little is known about the selective context under which various pitcher traits have evolved. This is especially true of colour-related traits, which have not been examined in a phylogenetic context. Using field observations of one polymorphic species (N. gracilis) and comparative phylogenetic analysis of 85 species across the genus, we investigate correlations between colour polymorphism and ecological factors including altitude, light environment and herbivory. In N. gracilis, colour does not correlate with amount of prey captured, but red pitchers experience less herbivory. Throughout the genus, colour polymorphism with redder lower pitchers appears to be evolutionarily favoured. We found a lack of phylogenetic signal for most traits, either suggesting that most traits are labile or reflecting the uncertainty regarding the underlying tree topology.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepenthes Gracilis Pitcher Plants
    With a Flick of the Lid: A Novel Trapping Mechanism in Nepenthes gracilis Pitcher Plants Ulrike Bauer1,2*, Bruno Di Giusto3, Jeremy Skepper4, T. Ulmar Grafe2, Walter Federle5 1 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Biology, University Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam, 3 English Language Center, Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 4 Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Abstract Carnivorous pitcher plants capture prey with modified leaves (pitchers), using diverse mechanisms such as ‘insect aquaplaning’ on the wet pitcher rim, slippery wax crystals on the inner pitcher wall, and viscoelastic retentive fluids. Here we describe a new trapping mechanism for Nepenthes gracilis which has evolved a unique, semi-slippery wax crystal surface on the underside of the pitcher lid and utilises the impact of rain drops to ‘flick’ insects into the trap. Depending on the experimental conditions (simulated ‘rain’, wet after ‘rain’, or dry), insects were captured mainly by the lid, the peristome, or the inner pitcher wall, respectively. The application of an anti-slip coating to the lower lid surface reduced prey capture in the field. Compared to sympatric N. rafflesiana, N. gracilis pitchers secreted more nectar under the lid and less on the peristome, thereby directing prey mainly towards the lid. The direct contribution to prey capture represents a novel function of the pitcher lid. Citation: Bauer U, Di Giusto B, Skepper J, Grafe TU, Federle W (2012) With a Flick of the Lid: A Novel Trapping Mechanism in Nepenthes gracilis Pitcher Plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum DIRECTOR’S REPORT 2003–2007 Richard Schulhof
    The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum DIRECTOR’S REPORT 2003–2007 Richard Schulhof Zelkova serrata (AA 1813-77) by Michael Dosmann etween 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2007, 1,011 accessions Richard Schulhof Bcomprising 2,075 plants were added to the Living Collec- tions, bringing the total number of accessions and plants to 10,176 and 15,665, respectively. Of the new accessions, 53% were of wild origin and 42% were of garden origin, and 103 additions were of taxa new to the collection. Below, the taxonomic profile of the Living Collections as of 30 June 2007. Numbers for infraspecific ranks correspond only to those accessions where rank is known. RANK NUMBER Families 97 Genera 351 Species 2254 Subspecies 75 Varieties 401 Formae 84 Cultivars 1552 Interspecific hybrids 456 Intergeneric hybrids 19 Jon Hetman THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY DIRECTOR’S REPORT: 2003–2007 Robert E. Cook, Director ARNOLDIA • VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 Arnoldia (ISSN 004-2633; USPS 866-100) is published quarterly by the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. Periodicals postage paid at Boston, Massachusetts. Copyright © 2008. The President and Fellows of Harvard College. The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University 125 Arborway, Boston, Massachusetts 02130 FRONT COVER: Weld Hill research facility, design sketch of Centre Street view (detail); KlingStubbins. BACK COVER: Model of Weld Hill research facility by GPI Models; photographs by Desroches Photography. Top main entrance and laboratory wing on the north side of the building; Bottom courtyard and greenhouses on the south side of the building. Quercus (oak) collection by Jon Hetman Introduction arly this spring, the Arnold Arboretum began construction of a new research and administration building at Weld Hill, Ea fourteen-acre parcel of land adjacent to the grounds of the Arboretum (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings No
    FRIM Proceedings No. 14 PROCEEDINGS Seminar on Reclamation, Rehabilitation and Restoration of Disturbed Sites: Planting of National and IUCN Red List Species 15 – 17 August 2017 Kuala Lumpur Organised by: Forest Research Institute Malaysia Supported by: Korea Forest Service Asia Pacific Association of Forestry Research Institutions PROCEEDINGS SEMINAR ON RECLAMATION, REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION OF DISTURBED SITES: PLANTING OF NATIONAL AND IUCN RED LIST SPECIES 15 – 17 August 2017, Kuala Lumpur Editors WM Ho V Jeyanny HS Sik CT Lee 2017 © Forest Research Institute Malaysia 2017 All enquiries should be forwarded to: Director General Forest Research Institute Malaysia 52109 Kepong Selangor Darul Ehsan Malaysia Tel: 603-6279 7000 Fax: 603-6273 1314 http://www.frim.gov.my Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data SEMINAR ON RECLAMATION, REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION OF DISTURBED SITES: PLANTING OF NATIONAL AND IUCN RED LIST SPECIES (2017 : Kuala Lumpur) PROCEEDINGS SEMINAR ON RECLAMATION, REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION OF DISTURBED SITES: PLANTING OF NATIONAL AND IUCN RED LIST SPECIES, 15-17 August 2017, Kuala Lumpur / Editors WM Ho, V Jeyanny, HS Sik, CT Lee. (FRIM PROCEEDINGS NO. 14) ISBN 978-967-2149-08-8 1. Forest restoration--Congresses. 2. Forest and forestry--Congresses. 3. Government publications--Malaysia. I. Ho, WM. II. V Jeyanny. III. Sik, HS. IV. Lee, CT. V. Institut Penyelidikan Perhutanan Malaysia. VI. Title. 634.9095 MS ISO 9001:2015 Certified CONTENTS Page KEYNOTE ADDRESSES Principle of Restoring Tropical
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Plastid DNA Sequence-Based Molecular Phylogeography of Salvadora
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050518; this version posted April 27, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Nuclear and Plastid DNA Sequence-based Molecular Phylogeography of Salvadora oleoides (Salvadoraceae) in Punjab, India Felix Bast1 and Navreet Kaur2 Centre for Plant Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India 1Corresponding author; Telephone: +91 98721 52694; Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050518; this version posted April 27, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Salvadora oleiodes is a tropical tree species belonging to the little-known family Salvadoraceae and distributed in the arid regions of Africa and Asia. Aims of our study were to trace the microevolutionary legacy of this tree species with the help of sequence-based multi-local phylogeography and to find the comparative placement of family Salvadoraceae within angiosperm clade malvids. A total 20 geographical isolates were collected from different regions of North India, covering a major part of its species range within the Indian Subcontinent. Sequence data from nuclear-encoded Internal Transcribed Spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) and plastid-encoded trnL-F spacer region, were generated for this species for the first time in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees of Somalia
    Trees of Somalia A Field Guide for Development Workers Desmond Mahony Oxfam Research Paper 3 Oxfam (UK and Ireland) © Oxfam (UK and Ireland) 1990 First published 1990 Revised 1991 Reprinted 1994 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library ISBN 0 85598 109 1 Published by Oxfam (UK and Ireland), 274 Banbury Road, Oxford 0X2 7DZ, UK, in conjunction with the Henry Doubleday Research Association, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK Typeset by DTP Solutions, Bullingdon Road, Oxford Printed on environment-friendly paper by Oxfam Print Unit This book converted to digital file in 2010 Contents Acknowledgements IV Introduction Chapter 1. Names, Climatic zones and uses 3 Chapter 2. Tree descriptions 11 Chapter 3. References 189 Chapter 4. Appendix 191 Tables Table 1. Botanical tree names 3 Table 2. Somali tree names 4 Table 3. Somali tree names with regional v< 5 Table 4. Climatic zones 7 Table 5. Trees in order of drought tolerance 8 Table 6. Tree uses 9 Figures Figure 1. Climatic zones (based on altitude a Figure 2. Somali road and settlement map Vll IV Acknowledgements The author would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the following organisations and individuals: Oxfam UK for funding me to compile these notes; the Henry Doubleday Research Association (UK) for funding the publication costs; the UK ODA forestry personnel for their encouragement and advice; Peter Kuchar and Richard Holt of NRA CRDP of Somalia for encouragement and essential information; Dr Wickens and staff of SEPESAL at Kew Gardens for information, advice and assistance; staff at Kew Herbarium, especially Gwilym Lewis, for practical advice on drawing, and Jan Gillet for his knowledge of Kew*s Botanical Collections and Somalian flora.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]