The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] Version 1.1 26 November 2017 1 Summary This document provides a new checklist for the craneflies and winter gnats (Tipuloidea, Ptychopteridae and Trichoceridae) to extend the lists of the diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire first published by Kidd and Bindle in 1959. Overall statistics on recording activity are given by decade and hectad. Checklists are presented for each of the three Watsonian vice-counties 58, 59, and 60 detailing for each species the number of records, year of earliest and most recent record, and the number of hectads with records. A combined checklist showing distribution by the three vice-counties is also included, covering a total of 264 species, amounting to 75% of the current British checklist. Introduction This report is the third in a series to update and extend the partial checklist of the diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire published in 1959 by Leonard Kidd and Alan Brindle1. There were two previous updates, in 19642 and 19713. The previous reports in this series cover the soldierflies and allies4 and the Sepsidae5, the latter family not having been covered in Ref 1. The reader is referred to the first two reports for the background and rationale of these checklists, as well as the history of diptera recording and available data sources. The description of methodology is also kept to a minimum in the present report: only significant differences from the previous publications will be outlined. The previous format of the tables and maps is continued. As before, the geographical scope is limited to the Watsonian vice-counties of Cheshire (VC58), South Lancashire (VC59), and West Lancashire (VC60). However to avoid confusion with the present political area of West Lancashire which lies within VC59, VC60 will be referred to as North Lancashire below. VC60 here is shorn of parts of south Cumbria which were covered erroneously in Ref 1. The Forest of Bowland largely remains in VC64, mid-west Yorkshire, and is also excluded. Taxonomic scope The UK Cranefly Recording Scheme (CRS) was set up by Alan Stubbs in 1973. This was followed by other Diptera recording schemes and then the formation of the Dipterists Forum (DF) in 1995. The scope of the CRS covered the following families: Tipulidae (long-palped craneflies): 87 British species Cylindrotomidae (damsel craneflies): 4 British species Pediciidae (hairy-eyed craneflies): 20 British species Limoniidae (short-palped craneflies): 221 British species in 4 subfamilies Ptychopteridae (phantom craneflies): 7 British species Trichoceridae (winter gnats): 10 British species The above numbers are taken from the January 2017 update of the British checklist on the DF website. The first four families are in the infra-order Tipulomorpha but the other two are more distantly related. The above listing follows the taxonomic order but in the tables below alphabetic order is followed. Draft keys were provided by Alan Stubbs around 1990 and have been revised recently by John Kramer in anticipation of publication of a long-promised book on British Craneflies. These keys also include notes on habitat in many cases. The Ptychopteridae are covered in a published atlas with keys6. An alternative method of keying has been used by Pete Boardman in his Shropshire Craneflies7 which covers 245 species recorded in that county: this also contains habitat notes. 2 These keys have superseded the relevant RES handbooks8, though these are still useful from time to time. A further invaluable source of information is the on-line Cranefly Catalogue of the World (CCW) which can be searched by species9. Sources of data and methodology The approach to collecting and analysing data follows that established for the soldierflies and allies in Ref 4. In addition to the data sources used there, records have been obtained from iRecord10 for the last ten years up to October 2017. Data has also been obtained from a survey of Astley Moss in 2010 by World Museum Liverpool11: these data do not appear either on the LRC or on NBN. The LRC data used was received in late 2016 or early 2017, and the NBN data was also downloaded during this period. My own data extend from 2012 to October 2017 and the duplicates thereof have been removed from the LRC data. The Harry Britten cards have been transcribed and checked against Ref 1 as done previously for the soldierflies and allies. This does create a certain amount of duplication with LRC and NBN data, but also adds much extra data particularly for common species. The numbers of records are as follows, amounting to a total of 14,961. Data Source VC58 VC59 VC60 Greater Manchester LRC 59 544 0 Harry Britten cards 1126 869 66 iRecord 24 0 99 LERN (Lancashire LRC) 0 71 125 Merseyside Biobank 64 489 1 NBN Gateway 1569 2093 1227 P Brighton 901 1441 34 RECORD (Cheshire LRC) 3824 261 29 WML 0 43 0 TOTALS 7567 5811 1581 Only limited validation has been carried out. A number of records of rare and implausible species have been omitted, primarily where the recorder was anonymous or a non-specialist. A number of other records were found with incorrect grid references and a few others had dates incompatible with the active dates of the named recorder. Such records have also been omitted. Uncertainties in other records are discussed in the species status notes in the Appendix. Overview of combined dataset The combined data have been analysed to provide details of recording frequency by decade and vice-county in Tables 1-4. The overall pattern is similar to that already found in Refs 4 and 5, though the records are more evenly split between VC58 and VC59. Table 1 shows the influence of Harry Britten during the 20s, 30s and 40s, with Cheshire visited rather more often than Lancashire. Alan Brindle’s records start in 1937 but were interrupted by war service. His contributions then extend from the 1950s through to 1982 when he retired from Manchester Museum. His records are strongly concentrated in areas of both the Lancashire vice- counties. It is also worth noting that he had a particular interest in cranefly larvae, and also other aquatic larvae. There was a lull in cranefly recording in the 1980s but during the 1990s and 2000s, the Cheshire numbers were greatly increased by Bill Hardwick. In the present decade, my own records have contributed at a similar level of effort in Cheshire, and rather more so in South Lancashire. 3 The maps in Tables 2a-c also show the strong influence of these recorders. In Cheshire the top four hectads are as follows: Hectad Description No. of records No. of species SJ57 Frodsham and Delamere Forest 1090 139 SJ66 Winsford and the Weaver Valley 1056 127 SJ88 South Manchester and Wilmslow 819 142 SJ98 Stockport, Marple and Poynton 776 109 The tally for SJ57 was significantly boosted by an invertebrate survey in 2003 for the Lost Meres and Mosses project12, and I have been carrying out further surveying there in the last few years13. SJ66 is the home square of Bill Hardwick and as well as the Weaver Valley contains the classic dipterising sites of Pettypool and Newchurch Common. SJ88 includes the Bollin Valley and Cotterill Clough: the latter was much frequented by Harry Britten and appears to have retained much of its diverse cranefly fauna despite its proximity to Manchester Airport14. SJ98 also owes its prominence largely to historic records by Harry Britten and others. Turning to South Lancashire, my home square SJ69 has become the most worked of all in the region but is relatively poor in species, as it has little extent of woodland and no upland areas. Alan Brindle worked extensively in SD73 and SD84 near to his home town of Nelson. SD61 was covered by entomologists based at Bolton Museum in the 70s and 80s and is the scene of renewed recording effort following the acquisition of the Smithills estate by the Woodland Trust. Hectad Description No. of records No. of species SJ69 NE Warrington and the Manchester 1189 109 Mosses SD73 Whalley and Padiham 559 126 SD61 NW Bolton and Winter Hill 397 107 SD84 Pendle Hill and Barnoldswick 318 96 A result of the much lower overall level of recording only two squares are highlighted in VC60: Hectad Description No. of records No. of species SD47 Silverdale area 573 117 SD63 Longridge area 165 74 There is no simple relation between number of records and the number of species recorded in a hectad. Apart from the intrinsic species numbers, this is affected by the increasing propensity of recorders in recent decades to record common species more thoroughly and at a higher grid resolution. Vice-county and Regional Checklists Tables 3a-c present the summary of the data for each of the three vice-counties in the format previously used for the soldierflies and allies and for the Sepsidae. The families are listed in alphabetical order rather than the taxonomic order presented above. The family Limoniidae has been split into its four British subfamilies. In each family or subfamily, species are listed alphabetically except for genus Tipula where subgenus names have been included. The earliest year of observation may represent the beginning of a range of years where no exact date was given in the historic records. Equally latest dates may represent the end of such a range. Table 4 provides a combined checklist for the whole region, comparing numbers of records in each vice-county. National conservation status classifications have been taken from the PANTHEON software, version 3.7.4, but have been simplified to just “rare” or “scarce”: a revised status review is 4 currently being prepared (see Ref 7).
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Coxa and Homeosis of Legs in Nematocera (Insecta: Diptera)
    Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 85: 131–148 (April 2004) StructureBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. of the coxa and homeosis of legs in Nematocera (Insecta: Diptera) Leonid Frantsevich Abstract Schmalhausen-Institute of Zoology, Frantsevich L. 2004. Structure of the coxa and homeosis of legs in Nematocera Kiev-30, Ukraine 01601 (Insecta: Diptera). — Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 85: 131–148 Construction of the middle and hind coxae was investigated in 95 species of Keywords: 30 nematoceran families. As a rule, the middle coxa contains a separate coxite, Insect locomotion – Homeotic mutations the mediocoxite, articulated to the sternal process. In most families, this coxite – Diptera – Nematocera is movably articulated to the eucoxite and to the distocoxite area; the coxa is Accepted for publication: radially split twice. Some groups are characterized by a single split. 1 July 2004 The coxa in flies is restricted in its rotation owing to a partial junction either between the meron and the pleurite or between the eucoxite and the meropleurite. Hence the coxa is fastened to the thorax not only by two pivots (to the pleural ridge and the sternal process), but at the junction named above. Rotation is impossible without deformations; the role of hinges between coxites is to absorb deformations. This adaptive principle is confirmed by physical modelling. Middle coxae of limoniid tribes Eriopterini and Molophilini are compact, constructed by the template of hind coxae. On the contrary, hind coxae in all families of Mycetophiloidea and in Psychodidae s.l. are constructed like middle ones, with the separate mediocoxite, centrally suspended at the sternal process. These cases are considered as homeotic mutations, substituting one structure with a no less efficient one.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Patterns of Finnish Crane Flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea)
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2012, Article ID 913710, 20 pages doi:10.1155/2012/913710 Research Article Biogeographic Patterns of Finnish Crane Flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) Jukka Salmela Zoological Museum, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland Correspondence should be addressed to Jukka Salmela, jueesal@utu.fi Received 27 April 2012; Revised 25 July 2012; Accepted 14 August 2012 Academic Editor: David Roubik Copyright © 2012 Jukka Salmela. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Species richness of terrestrial and freshwater biota generally decreases with increasing latitude. Some taxa, however, show an anomalous species richness pattern in a regional or global scale. The aim of this study was to examine (i) regional variation in species richness, (ii) faunistic composition, (iii) occupancy, and (iv) proportions of different distribution types of Finnish crane flies. Analyses were based on incidence data pooled into 20 biogeographical provinces. Finnish crane fly fauna consists of 335 species; the provincial richness varies from 91 to 237. The species richness of all species and saproxylic/fungivorous species decreased with increasing latitude; mire-dwelling crane flies displayed a reversed pattern (Spearman’s correlations). Thirty-one species occupied a single province and 11 species were present in all provinces. Provincial assemblages showed a strong latitudinal gradient (NMS ordination) and faunistic distance increased with increasing geographical distance (Mantel test). Nearly half (48%) of the Finnish crane flies are Trans-Palaearctic, roughly one-third (34%) are West Palaearctic, and only 16 and 2% are Holarctic and Fennoscandian, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Biological studies on the meadow pipit (anthus pratensis) and moorland tipulidae; members of a food chain Coulson, John Cameron How to cite: Coulson, John Cameron (1956) Biological studies on the meadow pipit (anthus pratensis) and moorland tipulidae; members of a food chain, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8840/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Biological studies on the Meadow Pipit (^thus mS^S^^^ and moorland fipuiidae (Dipt.); members of a rooa - : J^y John Cameron Coulson. Observations were made on 65 species of .!gipulidae found on the Moor itouse Nature Conservancy Reserve, Westmorland, between 1953 and 1956. The larval habitats were recorded and a stu<^ was made of the abundance and seasonal distribution of adults. Particular attention was paid to the biology of two common species of Tipulidae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Craneflies of Leicestershire and Rutland (VC55)
    LEICESTERSHIRE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY The Craneflies of Leicestershire and Rutland (VC55) John Kramer* Tipula maxima – Graham Calow LESOPS 26 (2011) ISSN 0957 - 1019 *31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester LE2 5TE 1 Introduction It is necessary to say at the outset that, since craneflies are not a scientific group, its meaning has changed over the years. It seems to be synonymous with daddy long-legs , meaning all long-legged two-winged flies. These, in the past, have included Winter Gnats (Trichoceridae) Fold-winged flies (Ptychopteridae) and Dixidae. The present meaning, used here, is restricted to the super-family Tipuloidea (Order Diptera) which, for the past 20 years (Starý 1992), has been composed of four families - Tipulidae, Pediciidae, Cylindrotomidae and Limoniidae. I have tried to provide a firm basis for further work on craneflies in VC55, and to suggest what that work might be. There are voucher specimens for most, though not all, of the records and wherever there is only a single record, more records are needed to firmly establish that species on the county list. Pioneering work in Europe Before any meaningful lists of craneflies could be produced it was necessary to have fixed and unambiguous names for them. The genus-species naming system for doing this was first provided for the then-known craneflies by the 1758 volume of Linnaeus’s Systemae Naturae , published in Sweden, so this date provides a starting-point. Linnaeus named 14 of the more conspicuous craneflies on the British Checklist. Johan Christian Fabricius was a student of Linnaeus and did more work than his mentor on insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Crane Flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) Subfamilies Relationships Using Molecular Sequence Data
    Master of Science Thesis Analysis of the crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) subfamilies relationships using molecular sequence data Saija Ahonen University of Jyväskylä Department of Ecological and Environmental Science Evolution genetic 23.7.2008 2 JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO, Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta Bio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitos Evoluutiogenetiikka AHONEN, S. : Vaaksiaisten (Diptera, Tipuloidea) alaheimojen sukulaisuussuhteiden selvittäminen molekyylisekvenssiaineiston avulla Pro Gradu -tutkielma: 28 s. Työn ohjaajat: Prof. Alessandro Grapputo, Prof. Johanna Mappes Tarkastajat: Prof. Anneli Hoikkala Heinäkuu 2008 Hakusanat: Diptera, elongaatio faktori 1α, sukupuu, sytokromi oksidaasi I, sytokromi oksidaasi II, Tipuloidea TIIVISTELMÄ Viimeisimpien vuosikymmenien aikana molekylaarisiin aineistoihin perustuvat menetelmät ovat osoittautuneet erittäin hyödyllisiksi organismien sukulaisuussuhteita tutkittaessa. Niiden avulla on mm. paljastettu kryptisiä lajeja, ja ne ovat mahdollistaneet myös hyvin kaukaisten organismien tutkimisen, mikä on ollut vaikeampaa pelkästään morfologisiin piirteisiin perustuen. Vaaksiaiset (Tipuloidea) ovat yksi kaksisiipisten (Diptera) lajirikkaimpia ryhmiä. Siitä huolimatta vaaksiaisista ei ole aiemmin tehty molekylaarisiin menetelmiin perustuvaa alemman tason sukupuututkimusta, eivätkä morfologiaan perustuvat tutkimukset ole antaneet täysin yksiselitteisiä tuloksia vaaksiaisten sukulaisuussuhteista. Tässä tutkimuksessa rakennettiin vaaksiaisten sukupuu käyttäen pätkiä proteiineja koodaavista geeneistä;
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest: Contents 1988–2021
    Dipterists Digest: contents 1988–2021 Latest update at 12 August 2021. Includes contents for all volumes from Series 1 Volume 1 (1988) to Series 2 Volume 28(2) (2021). For more information go to the Dipterists Forum website where many volumes are available to download. Author/s Year Title Series Volume Family keyword/s EDITOR 2021 Corrections and changes to the Diptera Checklist (46) 2 28 (2): 252 LIAM CROWLEY 2021 Pandivirilia melaleuca (Loew) (Diptera, Therevidae) recorded from 2 28 (2): 250–251 Therevidae Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire ALASTAIR J. HOTCHKISS 2021 Phytomyza sedicola (Hering) (Diptera, Agromyzidae) new to Wales and 2 28 (2): 249–250 Agromyzidae a second British record Owen Lonsdale and Charles S. 2021 What makes a ‘good’ genus? Reconsideration of Chromatomyia Hardy 2 28 (2): 221–249 Agromyzidae Eiseman (Diptera, Agromyzidae) ROBERT J. WOLTON and BENJAMIN 2021 The impact of cattle on the Diptera and other insect fauna of a 2 28 (2): 201–220 FIELD temperate wet woodland BARRY P. WARRINGTON and ADAM 2021 The larval habits of Ophiomyia senecionina Hering (Diptera, 2 28 (2): 195–200 Agromyzidae PARKER Agromyzidae) on common ragwort (Jacobaea vulgaris) stems GRAHAM E. ROTHERAY 2021 The enigmatic head of the cyclorrhaphan larva (Diptera, Cyclorrhapha) 2 28 (2): 178–194 MALCOLM BLYTHE and RICHARD P. 2021 The biting midge Forcipomyia tenuis (Winnertz) (Diptera, 2 28 (2): 175–177 Ceratopogonidae LANE Ceratopogonidae) new to Britain IVAN PERRY 2021 Aphaniosoma melitense Ebejer (Diptera, Chyromyidae) in Essex and 2 28 (2): 173–174 Chyromyidae some recent records of A. socium Collin DAVE BRICE and RYAN MITCHELL 2021 Recent records of Minilimosina secundaria (Duda) (Diptera, 2 28 (2): 171–173 Sphaeroceridae Sphaeroceridae) from Berkshire IAIN MACGOWAN and IAN M.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 82, 61 pages 6 June 2005 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS FIJI ARTHROPODS I NEAL L. EVENHUIS AND DANIEL J. BICKEL, EDITORS BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu- RESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin series (ISSN 0005-9439) was begun PUBLICATIONS OF in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research in many scientific fields throughout the Pacific. In 1987, the Bulletin series BISHOP MUSEUM was superceded by the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (ISSN 0893-3111) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (ISSN 0893-3138) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (ISSN 0893-3146) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (ISSN 0893-312X) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (NEW) (ISSN 1548-9620) Bishop Museum Press also publishes Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (ISSN 0893-1348), a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi- cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchang- ing publications may also contact the Bishop Museum Press for more information. BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 0893-1348 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © 2005 by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA FIJI ARTHROPODS Editors’ Preface We are pleased to present the first issue of Fiji Arthropods, a series offering rapid publica- tion and devoted to studies of terrestrial arthropods of the Fiji Group and nearby Pacific archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed APPENDICES Appendix A: Taxonomic Classification Appendix B: Taxonomic Attributes Appendix C: Taxonomic Standardization Appendix D: Rarefaction Appendix E: Biological Metric Descriptions Appendix F: Abiotic Parameters for Evaluating Stream Environment Appendix G: Stream Classification Appendix H: HUC12 Watershed Characteristics in Bioregions Appendix I: Index Methodologies Appendix J: Scoring Methodologies Appendix K: Index Performance, Accuracy, and Precision Appendix L: Narrative Ratings and Maps of Index Scores Appendix M: Potential Biases in the Regional Index Ratings Appendix Citations Appendix A: Taxonomic Classification All taxa reported in Chessie BIBI database were assigned the appropriate Phylum, Subphylum, Class, Subclass, Order, Suborder, Family, Subfamily, Tribe, and Genus when applicable. A portion of the taxa reported were reported under an invalid name according to the ITIS database. These taxa were subsequently changed to the taxonomic name deemed valid by ITIS. Table A-1. The taxonomic hierarchy of stream macroinvertebrate taxa included in the Chesapeake Bay non-tidal database.
    [Show full text]