2014 KCBS J Johnson Class 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2014 KCBS J Johnson Class 1 Israel and the Super Powers Overview Israel & the Super Powers • Saudi Arabia • Egypt • Palestinians • Iran • Jordan • Hamas • Iraq • Syria • Hezbollah • Turkey • Lebanon • Al Qaieda • Russia • US, UN, EU Israel & the Super Powers • Egypt • Assyria • Babylon • Medes & Persians • Greeks • Romans Israel & the Super Powers Media & Babylon Greece Rome Persia Israel & the Super Powers Media and Persia Babylon Greece Rome Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Media & Babylon Greece Rome Persia Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III Shalmanezer V Sargon II Sennacherib Esarhaddon Ashurbanipal Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III 745-727 BC! ! Shalmanezer V • Conquers Philistia! • Northern Israel strafed during reigns of Sargon II Pekah and Hoshea! • Damascus falls Sennacherib Esarhaddon Ashurbanipal Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III 727-722 BC! ! Shalmanezer V • Suppressed revolts of Phoenecian cities! • King Hoshea and all of Israel fall Sargon II Sennacherib Esarhaddon Ashurbanipal Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III 722-705 BC! ! Shalmanezer V • Merodach-baladan makes himself master of Babylon begins struggle to Sargon II free people from Assyria! • Revolt by Gaza with Egyptian help Sennacherib extinguished! • Revolt by Israel put down and Esarhaddon inhabitants exiled! • Judah pays tribute to remain in the land Ashurbanipal Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III Shalmanezer V 705-681 BC! Sargon II ! • Puts down all uprisings in Egypt, Syria, Sennacherib Palestine and the Phoenician Coast! • Retains sway over Babylon! Esarhaddon • Adds fleet in Persian Gulf! • War with Elam! Ashurbanipal • Renovates and beautifies Nineveh! • God slays army poised to attack Jerusalem in the days of Hezekiah! • Murdered by his two oldest sons Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III Shalmanezer V 705-681 BC! Sargon II ! • Assyria at the height of her power! Sennacherib • Conciliatory policy toward Babylon as with Sargon! Esarhaddon • Responsible for some repopulation of Samaria (Ez 4:2)! Ashurbanipal • Stopped revolts of peoples in Levant! • Invades Egypt and captures Memphis Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Assyria Tiglath-pileser III Shalmanezer V 668-626 BC! Sargon II ! • Assyria at the height of her culture! Sennacherib • Loses Egypt in a revolt! • Strengthens hold in Asia Minor, the Esarhaddon Levant, Babylon, and Elam! • Erects palaces! Ashurbanipal • Founds library at Nineveh Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Media Dioces Phraortes Cyaxeres Astyages Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Media Dioces 708-655 BC ! Phraortes • Chosen king by peers due to just character Cyaxeres • Built capital at Ecbatana • Ordered the monarchy Astyages • Solidifed tribes into a kingdom Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Media Dioces 655-633 BC ! Phraortes • Secures independence temporarily • Conquers Persians who pay tributes Cyaxeres • Revolts against Ashurbanipal but the Medes stopped and Phraortes was Astyages killed in battle Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Media Dioces 633-593 BC ! Phraortes • Sought to avenge father’s death • Successful Assyrian battle, Cyaxeres unsuccessful Sythian battle • Cyaxeres Sythian leaders Astyages • Joins with Babylon to attack Assyria • Nineveh and Assyria fall Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Media Dioces 593-550 BC ! Phraortes • A tyrant • Grandfather of Cyrus Cyaxeres • Deposed by Cyrus • Kingdom given to Persians without a Astyages battle Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC Cyrus Cambyses 525 BC Darius Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC 547 Croesus overthrown Cyrus Cambyses 525 BC Darius Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC 547 Croesus overthrown Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid Darius Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC 547 Croesus overthrown Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid Last 9 years wars with eastern people Darius Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC 547 Croesus overthrown Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid Last 9 years wars with eastern people Darius 525 Captures Memphis Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid Darius Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid 520 Temple rebuild resumes Darius Haggai & Zechariah prophesy Hystapses 500 BC 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid 520 Temple rebuild resumes Darius Haggai & Zechariah prophesy Hystapses 500 BC 516 Temple completed 475 BC Xeres 450 BC Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid 520 Temple rebuild resumes Darius Haggai & Zechariah prophesy Hystapses 500 BC 516 Temple completed 475 BC Xeres 463 Vashti refuses to appear before the king 462 Refuses to allow rebuilding of walls 459 Esther becomes queen 450 BC 458 Ezra and company to Jerusalem Artaxeres Longimanus 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Persia 550 BC Cyrus 538 Babylon falls; Return decreed 537 Rebuilding temple begins Cambyses 525 BC foundation laid 520 Temple rebuild resumes Darius Haggai & Zechariah prophesy Hystapses 500 BC 516 Temple completed 475 BC Xeres 463 Vashti refuses to appear before the king 462 Refuses to allow rebuilding of walls 459 Esther becomes queen 450 BC 458 Ezra and company to Jerusalem Artaxeres Longimanus 446 Nehemiah to Jerusalem; walls complete 434 Nehemiah reports to king 425 BC Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Who is Ahasuerus? Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Who is Ahasuerus? • Ezra 4:6: Cambyses son of Cyrus • Esther (throughout): Artaxeres • Daniel 9:1: Astyages if Darius the Mede is Astyages son Cyaxeres/Gobryas OR Cyaxeres the elder making Astyages his brother Israel & the Super Powers: Overview Who is Ahasuerus? • Ezra 4:6: Cambyses son of Cyrus • Esther (throughout): Artaxeres • Daniel 9:1: Astyages if Darius the Mede is Astyages son Cyaxeres/Gobryas OR Cyaxeres the elder making Astyages his brother Who is Darius the Persian? Nehemiah 12:22: Darius III Codomannus, last king of Persia.
Recommended publications
  • 1. the Biblical Data Regarding Darius the Mede
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Autumn 1982, Vol. 20, No. 3, 229-217. Copyright 0 1982 by Andrews University Press. DARIUS THE MEDE: AN UPDATE WILLIAM H. SHEA Andrews University The two main historical problems which confront us in the sixth chapter of Daniel have to do with the two main historical figures in it, Darius the Mede, who was made king of Babylon, and Daniel, whom he appointed as principal governor there. The problem with Darius is that no ruler of Babylon is known from our historical sources by this name prior to the time of Darius I of Persia (522-486 B.c.). The problem with Daniel is that no governor of Babylon is known by that name, or by his Babylonian name, early in the Persian period. Daniel's position mentioned here, which has received little attention, will be discussed in a sub- sequent study. In the present article I shall treat the question of the identification of Darius the Mede, a matter which has received considerable attention, with a number of proposals having been advanced as to his identity. I shall endeavor to bring some clarity to the picture through a review of the cuneiform evidence and a comparison of that evidence with the biblical data. As a back- ground, it will be useful also to have a brief overview of the various theories that have already been advanced. 1. The Biblical Data Regarding Darius the Mede Before we consider the theories regarding the identification of Darius the Mede, however, note should be taken of the information about him that is available from the book of Daniel.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø
    An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø Copyright © 2016 by Prods Oktor Skjærvø Please do not cite in print without the author’s permission. This Introduction may be distributed freely as a service to teachers and students of Old Iranian. In my experience, it can be taught as a one-term full course at 4 hrs/w. My thanks to all of my students and colleagues, who have actively noted typos, inconsistencies of presentation, etc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Select bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 9 Sigla and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 Lesson 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Old Persian and old Iranian. .................................................................................................................... 13 Script. Origin. .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Script. Writing system. ........................................................................................................................... 14 The syllabary. .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Logograms. ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Sources Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop Edited by Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg and Amélie Kuhrt
    Achaemenid History • II The Greek Sources Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop edited by Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg and Amélie Kuhrt Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten Leiden 1987 ACHAEMENID HISTORY 11 THE GREEK SOURCES PROCEEDINGS OF THE GRONINGEN 1984 ACHAEMENID HISTORY WORKSHOP edited by HELEEN SANCISI-WEERDENBURG and AMELIE KUHRT NEDERLANDS INSTITUUT VOOR HET NABIJE OOSTEN LEIDEN 1987 © Copyright 1987 by Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten Witte Singe! 24 Postbus 9515 2300 RA Leiden, Nederland All rights reserved, including the right to translate or to reproduce this book or parts thereof in any form CIP-GEGEVENS KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Greek The Greek sources: proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid history workshop / ed. by Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg and Amelie Kuhrt. - Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.- (Achaemenid history; II) ISBN90-6258-402-0 SISO 922.6 UDC 935(063) NUHI 641 Trefw.: AchaemenidenjPerzische Rijk/Griekse oudheid; historiografie. ISBN 90 6258 402 0 Printed in Belgium TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations. VII-VIII Amelie Kuhrt and Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg INTRODUCTION. IX-XIII Pierre Briant INSTITUTIONS PERSES ET HISTOIRE COMPARATISTE DANS L'HIS- TORIOGRAPHIE GRECQUE. 1-10 P. Calmeyer GREEK HISTORIOGRAPHY AND ACHAEMENID RELIEFS. 11-26 R.B. Stevenson LIES AND INVENTION IN DEINON'S PERSICA . 27-35 Alan Griffiths DEMOCEDES OF CROTON: A GREEKDOCTORATDARIUS' COURT. 37-51 CL Herrenschmidt NOTES SUR LA PARENTE CHEZ LES PERSES AU DEBUT DE L'EM- PIRE ACHEMENIDE. 53-67 Amelie Kuhrt and Susan Sherwin White XERXES' DESTRUCTION OF BABYLONIAN TEMPLES. 69-78 D.M. Lewis THE KING'S DINNER (Polyaenus IV 3.32).
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnar Heinsohn (University of Bremen, May 2006)
    1 Cyaxares: Media’s Great King in Egypt, Assyria, and Iran by Gunnar Heinsohn (University of Bremen, May 2006) I Cyaxares in the sources, and their refutation THE CLAIMS OF CLASSICAL HISTORIOGRAPHY: "He [Phraortes] began to subdue all Asia, going from people to people, until, in his campaigning, he came against the Assyrians, and especially those of the Assyrians who held Nineveh. These Assyrians had formerly ruled all of Asia but were now quite isolated, all their allies having dropped away from them. But in themselves they were as strong as ever, and when Phraortes fought them, he himself was killed. / Cyaxares, the son of Phraortes, [...] drew together under his own rule all Asia beyond the Halys. Then, collecting all his subject peoples, he attacked Nineveh. [...] He had defeated the Assyrians in battle; but then, when he was beleaguering Nineveh, there came upon him a great host of Scythians, whose leader was their king, Madyes. / The Medes also took Nineveh [...] and they made the Assyrians their subject, except for the province of Babylon“. (Herodotus, The History, I: 102/103/106.) --------------------------------------------------------- ASSYRIOLOGY’S “REFUTATION” OF CLASSICAL HISTORIANS: "In Assyrian and Babylonian records and in the archaeological evidence no vestiges of an imperial structure [of the Medes; G.H.] can be found. The very existence of a Median empire, with the emphasis on empire, is thus questionable. / I would suggest [...] that the Medikos Logikos, as we have it, is essentially a Greek product“. (Sancisi-Weerdenburg 1988, 212 / Sancisi-Weerdenburg 1994, 55.) “Only 20 years ago, the existence of a Median ‘Empire’ that had immediately succeeded the fall of Assyria, and ruled, for half a century, large parts of the Near East until Cyrus — as a supposed vassal of Astyages, the last king of Media — had defeated his overlord and inherited his empire, was regarded as a safe historical fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Hystaspes, Gobryas, and Elite Marriage Politics in Teispid Persia John Hyland Christ Opher Newport University
    Samuel Jordan Center for Persian Studies and Culture www.dabirjournal.org Digital Archive of Brief notes & Iran Review ISSN: 2470-4040 No.5.2018 1 xšnaoθrahe ahurahe mazdå Detail from above the entrance of Tehran’s fire temple, 1286š/1917–18. Photo by © Shervin Farridnejad The Digital Archive of Brief Notes & Iran Review (DABIR) ISSN: 2470-4040 www.dabirjournal.org Samuel Jordan Center for Persian Studies and Culture University of California, Irvine 1st Floor Humanities Gateway Irvine, CA 92697-3370 Editor-in-Chief Touraj Daryaee (University of California, Irvine) Editors Parsa Daneshmand (Oxford University) Arash Zeini (Freie Universität Berlin) Shervin Farridnejad (Freie Universität Berlin) Judith A. Lerner (ISAW NYU) Book Review Editor Shervin Farridnejad (Freie Universität Berlin) Advisory Board Samra Azarnouche (École pratique des hautes études); Dominic P. Brookshaw (Oxford University); Matthew Canepa (University of Minnesota); Ashk Dahlén (Uppsala University); Peyvand Firouzeh (Cambridge University); Leonardo Gregoratti (Durham University); Frantz Grenet (Collège de France); Wouter F.M. Henkelman (École Pratique des Hautes Études); Rasoul Jafarian (Tehran University); Nasir al-Ka‘abi (University of Kufa); Andromache Karanika (UC Irvine); Agnes Korn (CNRS, UMR Mondes Iranien et Indien); Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones (University of Edinburgh); Jason Mokhtarain (University of Indiana); Ali Mousavi (UC Irvine); Mahmoud Omidsalar (CSU Los Angeles); Antonio Panaino (University of Bologna); Alka Patel (UC Irvine); Richard Payne (University of Chicago); Khodadad Rezakhani (History, UCLA); Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis (British Museum); M. Rahim Shayegan (UCLA); Rolf Strootman (Utrecht University); Giusto Traina (University of Paris-Sorbonne); Mohsen Zakeri (University of Göttingen) Logo design by Charles Li Layout and typesetting by Kourosh Beighpour Contents Notes 1- Hamid Bikas Shourkaei: La satrapie de Phrygie hellespontique (Daskyleion): des origines 1 à la chute de l’Empire perse achéménide 2- Stanley M.
    [Show full text]
  • Media and the Medes
    Media and the Medes Medesmēdz; MEDIA mēdē-ə [Heb māḏî, māḏay; II. History Aram māḏay; Assyr Madai; Old Pers Māda; Gk Mēdoi, Mēdia]; AV also MEDIAN (Dnl. 5:31 [MT From the 9th cent b.c., Assyrian inscriptions record 6:1]). An ancient people and land SW of the attacks on Median settlements in northern Iran Caspian Sea, between the Zagros Mountains and (ARAB, I, § 581, Shalmaneser III; § 739, Adad- the Salt Desert (Dasht-i-Kavir), including Azerbai- nirari III). At that time there was no single Me- jan in the north (Media Atropatene). Most of this dian state but instead numerous tribal groups that area is mountainous, with fertile valleys and some often fought each other and raided the neighbor- broad plains where horses were raised. ing states of Mannai and Urartu. Tiglath-pileser III established control over some Median territory, I. Culture and Religion claiming capture of 65,000 men, ca 740 b.c.; Sargon II fought against Medes, Manneans, and Urartians, So little excavation has been done in the Median with numbers of chieftains submitting to him. One homeland that there is only scattered material evi- leader, Dayaukku, was deported to Syria, and Is- dence for cultural and religious history. The Medes raelite citizens were settled in Media were Aryans (cf. Gen. 10:2), closely akin to the Persians, and entered Iran as nomads ca 1000 b.c. Apparently Media posed little threat to Assyria for Their religion may have begun as a form of nature the next two decades. Cimmerian and Scythian worship with animal sacrifices, the Magi tribe hav- invasions, however, ousted Assyria from Mannai ing a privileged role.
    [Show full text]
  • 316 Chronology: Timeline of Biblical World History Biblestudying.Net
    Chronology 316: Timeline of Biblical World History biblestudying.net Brian K. McPherson and Scott McPherson Copyright 2012 Period Five: The Destruction of the Temple to the Decree of Daniel 9 (Part 2) Biblical Considerations which May Indicate that the Secular Chronologies Aren’t Fully Accurate Using the standard chronology of this period and identifying Artaxerxes’ decree to Ezra would have Daniel 9:25’s 69 weeks of years begin in the year 458-457 BC. The same historical chronology would place the destruction of the Temple by the Babylonians in the year 586 BC. This means that, according to conventional chronologies, there was a total of 128 years between the desolation of Jerusalem and the Temple (in 586 BC) and the decree given to Ezra to restore and rebuild Jerusalem and its walls (in 458-457 BC.) However, earlier in our study we also learned that there may be some reason to conclude that prophet Ezekiel was noting the occurrence of a Jubilee year 14 years after destruction of the Temple (Ezekiel 40:1 and Leviticus 25.) Likewise, we learned that Daniel 9:25 indicates that the 69 weeks of years before the coming of the Messiah began with a grouping of 7 weeks of years. As Tim Warner has noted, Daniel 9:25’s grouping of 7 weeks of years may, in fact, refer to the jubilee cycle described in Leviticus 25. Yet, there is also a deliberate distinction between the first 7 Sabbatical cycles (49 years) and the remaining 62 Sabbatical cycles (434 years). Why? Scholars have struggled to explain this division.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sculptures and Inscription of Darius the Great on the Rock Of
    THE SCULPTURES AND INSCRIPTION OF BEHISTUN. PLATE I. Darius the Great, accompanied by attendants, with one foot placed on the prostrate body of the Pseudo-Smerdis (Gaumata). From the rock -sculpture at Behistun. THE SCULPTURES AND INSCRIPTION OF DARIUS THE GREAT ON THE ROCK OF BEHISTCN IN PERSIA. A NEW COLLATION OF THE PERSIAN, SUSIAN, AND BABYLONIAN TEXTS, WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS, ETC. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES, SOLD AT THE BRITISH MUSEUM; AND AT LONGMANS & Co., 39, PATERNOSTER Row; BERNARD QUARITCH, 15, PICCADILLY; ASHER & Co., 13, BEDFORD STREET, COVENT GARDEN ; AND HENRY FROWDE, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, AMEN CORNER, LONDON. 1907. [All rights reserved^ LONDON : HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HIS MAJESTY, ST. MARTIN'S LANE. CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ix INTRODUCTION xi LIST OF PROPER NAMES xlvii THE TEXT OF THE BEHISTUN INSCRIPTION : I. THE PERSIAN TEXT i EPIGRAPHS 84 II. THE SUSIAN VERSION 93 EPIGRAPHS 152 III. THE BABYLONIAN VERSION 159 'EPIGRAPHS . 207 INDEX 211 THE following pages contain the Persian text, with its Susian and Babylonian versions, of the Inscription which Darius the Great caused to be cut on the Rock of Behistun, which is situated in Persia on the ancient caravan route between Babylon and Ecbatana. The Inscription was first copied and translated by the late Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlinson, Bart, G.C.B., whose study of it enabled him to bring to a successful issue the decipherment of the Cuneiform Inscriptions. His edition of the Persian text, accompanied by a Commentary, appeared in the tenth volume of the Joitrnal of the Royal Asiatic Society in 1847, and his final edition of the texts of the Babylonian version was published by the Trustees of the British Museum in Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Du Mont Royal ←
    Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres HERODOTI HISTORIARUM’LIBRI 1X; GRAECE ET LATINE. T O M U S V. I Adnotationes ad lib. I -- IV. ARGENTORATI TYPIS PHILIPPI IACOBI DANNBACII. HERODOTI MUSAE i 8173 HISTORIARUM LIBRI’ 1X. AD VETERUM CODICUM PIDEM DENUO RECENSUIT LECTITONISlVARIETATE CONTINUA INTERPŒETATIONE LATINA ADlN’OTATIONIBUS WESSELINGII ET VALCKENARII ALIORUMQUE ET SUIS ILLUSTRAVIT IOHANNES SCHWEIGHAEUSER IN ACAD. ARGENT. ET SEMa PROT. LITERAR- GRAEC- PROF. ACADEMIAE BEC. INSCRIPT. ET HUM. LITEBAI. ADSCR. - TOMUS QUINTUS. ARGENTOBATI ET PARISIIS Arma TREUTTEL ET wÜRTz, ExanloroLAs. MDCCCXVL I muer :u’ HERODOTIIflSTORlAR ï T. v. P. 1. ADN’OTATIONES A!) LIB. LET 11. 8 ADNOTATIONES MWA-D HERODOTI LIBRUM PRIMUM. P RODE M Lin. l. ’Hçûo’rw iANæupnwïoç) Ariatotdù cente [in nonnullîs cette Historiarum Herodoti npographis] ’Hpoîo’rou Bouffon il? implnç dædîtëlç legebatur, lutter. lib. HI. 9. [aliis cap. 5. sect. x. sic in cd. Oxon.] neque deinoepo dei’uerunt, qui, inducto ’ANnœyanluç titulo, 0mm ml- luerunt apud Plutarchum de Eril. p. 604. et de Molign. He- rodoti p. 868. Addidernt se Hercdotus colonis, qui Thu- rîos in magnum Graeciam obier-ont: qua in urbe ouin hoc opus nbœlverit. 9.69... nominale se potuit, lieuti baud pouci ndpellnrunt , Strabon: teste lib. XIV. p. 970. [p. 656. cd. Canaub.] In bis lmp. Iuliaruu, ouin: Maud: 8min», [i. e. Hùtoriarum Scriptorem Thurium] Oratoran Thurimn ouin inprudenter Bourdelotiua explicuisset, poenu doctio viris dedit ad Lucian. Quom. Scrib. Histor. e.
    [Show full text]
  • Babil Kuneiform Tabletleri Ile Antik Kaynaklar Işığında Media, Lydia Ve Küçük Asya Fatihi Büyük Kyros
    Mediterranean Journal of Humanities mjh.akdeniz.edu.tr I/2, 2011, 195-211 Babil Kuneiform Tabletleri ile Antik Kaynaklar Işığında Media, Lydia ve Küçük Asya Fatihi Büyük Kyros Cyrus the Great - Conqueror of Media, Lydia and Asia Minor in the Light of the Babylonian Cuneiform Tablets and the Ancient Sources Sevgi SARIKAYA Özet: Bu makalede, Büyük Kyros’un İ.Ö. ca. 559 yılında tahta geçişiyle İ.Ö. 553-İ.Ö. ca. 547/546 yıllarına kadar giriştiği seferler ışığında Pers/Akhaimenid imparatorluğunun kuruluş süreci; siyasi-idari yapılanma- sıyla Kyros’un kişiliği ve politikası ele alınmaktadır. Çalışma esas itibariyle döneme ilişkin temel ve başlıca bilgiler veren Babil küneiform tabletleri ve antik kaynaklar çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Birinci elden dokümanlar, resmi ve güvenilir belgeler olan çivi yazılı tabletlerin azlığı ve özet halinde kaleme alınmasından ötürü, Kyros hakkında en ayrıntılı veriler antik kaynaklardır. Bu nedenle şu ana kadar mo- dern yazarlarca ihmal edilmiş, dağınık halde bulunan antik kaynaklar ve çivi yazılı tabletler derlenerek analiz edilmiş; metinin ilgili kısımlarında detaylıca tartışılmıştır. Bununla birlikte Pers yerel kaynakla- rınca adeta efsaneleştirilen krala ait anekdotların yer yer Hellen yazarları tarafından da kabul görülüp, takip edilmesi Kyros’a ilişkin bir dizi spekülasyona yol açmaktadır. Bu bağlamda küneiform tabletleriyle antik kaynakların kendi içlerinde uzlaştıkları ve ayrıştıkları yanlar belirlenerek efsane ile tarihsel gerçek- ler ayrıştırılmaya; bununla birlikte Pers kralının bir portresi çizilmeye
    [Show full text]
  • Cyrus and the Achaemenids*
    CYRUS AND THE ACHAEMENIDS* By Matt Waters University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Understanding of early Achaemenid history has him through four generations: “Darius the king undergone significant changes in recent scholarship. proclaims: My father is Hystaspes, the father of Recent research has emphasised the familial distinction Hystaspes is Arsames, the father of Arsames was between Cyrus the Great and Darius I, and it has Ariaramnes, the father of Ariaramnes was Teispes, the become difficult to give credence to the traditional, father of Teispes was Achaemenes. Darius the king modern reconstruction of Darius’ kinship claims that proclaims: For this reason we are called implies a dual descent from Achaemenes via Teispes: ‘Achaemenids’.”2 This lineal descent, in subsequent one line to Cyrus and the other to Darius. With Cyrus’ inscriptions, became simply “Achaemenid” (i.e., minus inscriptions at Pasargadae demonstrated as spurious, the full genealogical progression), used as a dynastic and the “Achaemenid dynasty” demonstrated as marker. This Achaemenid emphasis is consistently Darius’ creation ex nihilo, the relationship between reflected in Darius’ titulary, for example, “I am Darius Darius and his predecessors requires a new assessment. the Great King, King of Kings, King of many countries, Darius has been viewed as an unabashed liar, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenid” (DPe §1 — with despite the consistent antipathy toward the Lie (Old minor variations in several other inscriptions).3 Persian drauga) emphasised in his royal inscriptions. The name Achaemenes or title “Achaemenid” does As typical of the genre of royal apologia, the truth not occur in Cyrus’ inscriptions (notwithstanding the therein reflects the truth as the sovereign portrayed it, Pasargadae inscriptions, in fact commissioned and with historical accuracy, as we would define it, not a placed by Darius).4 Cyrus traced his lineage to his priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Darius the Mede
    1/27/2021 Daniel Defended : 4.3 - Darius the Mede Subscribe Get a Copy Section number, topic, or verse? Go 4.3 - Darius the Mede CONTENTS 4.3.1 - Who is Darius the Mede? 4.3.6 - Gobryas, Gubaru, Ugbaru 4.3.11 - Darius is Cyaxares II? 4.3.2 - Darius: A Title 4.3.7 - Family Relations of Darius as Median King 4.3.12 - Darius is Darius 4.3.3 - Darius Within the Bible 4.3.8 - Darius is Astyages II? 4.3.4 - Darius Outside the Bible 4.3.9 - Darius is Cambyses II? 4.3.5 - Who is Darius? 4.3.10 - Darius is Cyrus? 4.3.1 - Who is Darius the Mede? In one sense, we know everything we need to know about Darius the Mede: the man who received the kingdom at the downfall of Babylonian was named Darius and was a Mede of about 62 years of age (Dan. 5:31‣). This is sufficient for the believer who rests upon what God has revealed—no more information is needed to make sense of what the Bible records and the place Darius occupies in the sequence of Gentile Kingdoms. 1 But, for those who are interested in the relationship between God’s revelation and what is known from extra- biblical sources concerning history, the question arises whether Darius the Mede is known to archaeology or by historical records outside the Bible? 4.3.2 - Darius: A Title Correlating Darius the Mede with rulers known to extra-biblical history has proven to be a complex task, made all-the-more challenging because the name “Darius” is applied within historic inscriptions to at least five Persian rulers.
    [Show full text]