FARA Report to Congress, Volume 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FARA Report to Congress, Volume 2 • Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the calendar year 1995 Volume II TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1.1 Text ofReport Algeria 1 Angola 2 Anguilla 6 Antigua 7 Argentina 8 Aruba 12 Australia 16 Austria 25 Azerbaijan 32 Bahamas 35 Bahrain 40 Barbados 41 Barbuda 7 Belarus 45 Belgium 46 Benin 51 Bermuda 52 Bolivia 60 Bonaire 61 Botswana 62 Brazil 63 Brazzaville 167 British Virgin Islands 68 Brunei 70 Bulgaria 71 Cambodia 72 Cameroon 73 Canada 74 Cape Verde 119 Cayman Islands 120 Central African Republic 124 Chad 125 Chile 126 China 131 China, Republic of (Taiwan) 141 Colombia 159 Comoro Islands 166 Congo 167 Costa Rica 169 Cote d'Ivoire 173 Croatia 174 Curacao 176 Cyprus 178 Czech Republic 181 Czechoslovakia 182 Denmark 183 Dominica 186 Dominican Republic 187 Ecuador 189 Egypt 191 EI Salvador 193 Equatorial Guinea 197 Ethiopia 198 Fiji 201 Finland 202 France 206 Gabon 225 Georgia 229 Germany 230 Great Britain 254 Greece 290 Grenada 291 Grenadines 665 Guadeloupe 292 Guatemala 293 Guernsey 296 Guinea 297 Guinea-Bissau 298 Guyana 299 Haiti 300 Honduras 306 Hong Kong 308 Hungary 317 Iceland 319 India 320 Indonesia 326 International 334 Iran 357 Ireland 359 Israel 365 Italy 381 Ivory Coast 174 Jamaica 391 Japan 398 Jordan 471 Kazakhstan 472 Korea, Republic of 473 Kosova 496 Kuwait 498 Lebanon 500 Liberia 501 Luxembourg 502 Macao 503 Macedonia 504 Malawi 505 Malaysia 506 Maldives 508 Malta 509 Marshall Islands 511 Martinique 292 Mauritania 513 Mauritius 514 Mexico 515 Micronesia 540 Moldova 541 Monaco 542 Mongolia 543 Montenegro 544 Morocco 545 Mozambique 547 Netherlands 548 Netherlands Antilles 553 Nevis 662 New Zealand 554 Nicaragua 557 Nigeria 558 Northern Ireland 563 Norway 567 Oman 578 Pakistan 581 Palau 586 Palestine 588 Panama 590 Paraguay 594 Peru 595 Philippines 597 Poland 603 Portugal 605 Portuguese Timor 608 Principe 628 Qatar 609 Romania 610 Russia 613 Saba 661 San Marino 627 Sao Tome 628 Saudi Arabia 629 Scotland 636 Senegal 639 Serbia 640 Seychelles 641 Sierra Leone 642 Singapore 644 Slovenia 649 Somali Democratic Republic 650 South Africa 651 Spain 657 Sri Lanka 660 St. Christopher 662 St. Eustatius 661 St. Kitts 662 St. Lucia 663 St. Vincent 665 Sudan 666 Suriname 667 Swaziland 668 Sweden 669 Switzerland 675 Tahiti 690 Taiwan (See China, Republic of) 141 Tanzania 691 Thailand 692 Tibet 697 Tajikistan 698 Tobago 702 Togo 699 Tonga 701 Trinidad 702 Tunisia 704 Turkey 705 Turkmenistan 709 Turks and Caicos Islands 710 Uganda 711 Ukraine 712 United Arab Emirates 718 Uruguay 722 Uzbekistan 723 Vanuatu 724 Venezuela 725 Vietnam 728 Yemen 729 Zaire 730 Zambia 731 Zimbabwe 734 Appendix A A.l Alphabetical listing ofall primary registrants whose registrations were in active status at any time during the calendar year 1995 as well as the countries in which their foreign principals are located and the foreign principals they represent. Appendix B B.l Alphabetical listing ofall individuals whose short forms were in active status at any time during the calendar year 1995, as well as the names ofthe primary registrants with whom the forms were filed. Jordan Aspen Hill Enterprises, Ltd., #4158 1620 I Street, N.W. Suite 202 Washington, DC 20006 Hashemite Kingdom ofJordan Nature of Services: Lobbying The registrant made preparations for and followed-up on two visits to the U.S. by His Majesty King Hussein and one visit by the Crown Prince during the reporting period, as well as follow-up on a trip to Jordan by the registrant. The registrant made itselfavailable to members ofthe press and other persons and organization interested in the region. The registrant participated in commercial activities and international travel not pertinent to registration reporting requirements. $120,000.00 for the 12 month period ending July 13, 1995 Political Propaganda: None Reported ~wens, Wayne, #4907 c/o Weil, Gotshal & Manges 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Hashemite Kingdom ofJordan & the Higher Council for Science & Technology ofthe Hashemite Kingdom ofJordan Nature of Services: Legal and Other Services/ Lobbying Activity: None Reported Finances: None Reported Political Propaganda: None Reported 471 Jordan Kazakhstan PIC Advisors, Inc., #4806 1575 I Street, N.W. Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20005 Office ofthe President ofKazakhstan Nature ofServices: ConsultantlPublic Relations Activity: None Reported Finances: None Reported Political Propaganda: None Reported Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, #4550 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20005-2107 Republic ofKazakhstan Nature ofServices: Legal and Other Services/ Lobbying The registrant provided legal advice regarding various commercial transactions with other countries and advice on treaty negotiations with other countries. The registrant also reviewed legislation and provided legal advice regarding tax laws. $203,504.00 for the 12 month period ending July 31, 1995 Political Propaganda: None Reported 472 Kazakhstan Korea, Republic of Aitken, Irvin & Lewin, #5049 1709 N Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Hyundai Motor Company Nature ofServices: Industrial Promotion The registrant agreed to educate U.S. Government officials regarding the Korean auto market. Finances: None Reported Political Propaganda: None Reported Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., #3492 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 Cheil Industries, Inc. (t) Nature of Services: Legal and Other Services/ Lobbying The registrant contacted an official ofthe Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Trade Representative, and members ofCongress regarding Samsung Petrochemical-Amoco commercial dispute. $32,851.00 for the 6 month period ending June 24, 1995 Political Propaganda: None Reported 473 Korea, Republic of Samsung Corporation Nature ofServices: Legal and Other Services! Lobbying The registrant contacted congressional staff and executive branch officials regarding a commercial dispute between the Samsung Corporation and a U.S. company. Finances: None Reported The registrant disseminated an information paper regarding the commercial dispute between Samsung and Amoco. The registrant also sent letters to U.S. Government officials regarding a Samsung - Amoco meeting. American International Consulting Group, Inc., #4939 One Tampa City Center Suite 2350 Tampa, FL 33602 Korean Overseas Yeterans Association (KaYA) Nature of Services: Lobbying Activity: None Reported Finances: None Reported Political Propaganda: None Reported 474 Korea, Republic of apital International Information Services, Inc., #4472 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 5500 Washington, DC 20006 Korea Foreign Trade Association (t) Nature ofService: Lobbying The registrant monitored the progress ofthe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) legislation on Capitol Hill, including preparation ofreports and analysis oflegislation. $173,636.81 for the 6 month period ending February 28, 1995 The registrant disseminated a memorandum commenting on proposed legislation concerning captive production to public officials. Korean Iron & Steel Association Nature of Services: ConsultantILobbying The registrant rendered advice to the foreign principal on U.S. laws, regulations and policies concerning international trade matters. The registrant represented the foreign principal in anti-dumping and countervailing duty proceedings before the U.S. Department ofCommerce and the U.S. Court ofInternational Trade concerning imports ofsteel from Korea. $928.66 for the 6 month period ending February 28, 1995 Political Propaganda: None Reported. 475 Korea, Republic of Republic ofKorea, Ministry ofTrade, Industry & Energy (t) Nature ofServices: Lobbying The registrant monitored the progress ofthe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) legislation on Capitol Hill, including preparation ofreports and analysis oflegislation. All monies reported under Korea Foreign Trade Association. The registrant disseminated a memorandum to public officials commenting on proposed legislation concerning captive production. Carmen Group, Inc. & Linton, Mields, Reisler & Cottone, Inc., #4855 125 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 Hyundai Precision & Industry Company, Ltd. Nature ofServices: U.S. Policy Consultant The registrant organized meetings in the United States between the foreign principal and various U.S. businesses. $160,000.00 for the 12 month period ending September 30, 1995 Political Propaganda: None Reported 476 Korea, Republic of ostello, Stephen, #5065 • 6110 Executive Boulevard Suite 1000 Rockville, MD 20852 Kim Dae-Jung Peace Foundation, U.S.A. Nature ofServices: Public Relations The registrant agreed to promote the work ofthe foreign principal to those interested in Asia, Korea, or Asian democracy by attending seminars and meetings, producing a newsletter, and hosting meetings and promotional events. Finances: None Reported Political Propaganda: None Reported Crawford & Company Public Relations, #4796 (T) 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 340 Washington, DC 20036 Korean Foreign Trade Association (t) Nature of Services: Public Relations Activity: None Reported Finances: None Reported Political Propaganda: None Reported 477 Korea, Republic of Crowell & Moring International, L.P., #3988 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 1275 Washington, DC 20004-2595 Korean Foreign Trade Association Nature ofServices: Trade Consultant The registrant provided advice on general trade matters and analysis regarding trade developments
Recommended publications
  • The BCCI Affair
    The BCCI Affair A Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate by Senator John Kerry and Senator Hank Brown December 1992 102d Congress 2d Session Senate Print 102-140 This December 1992 document is the penultimate draft of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee report on the BCCI Affair. After it was released by the Committee, Sen. Hank Brown, reportedly acting at the behest of Henry Kissinger, pressed for the deletion of a few passages, particularly in Chapter 20 on "BCCI and Kissinger Associates." As a result, the final hardcopy version of the report, as published by the Government Printing Office, differs slightly from the Committee's softcopy version presented below. - Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists This report was originally made available on the website of the Federation of American Scientists. This version was compiled in PDF format by Public Intelligence. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION ............................................................................... 21 THE ORIGIN AND EARLY YEARS OF BCCI .................................................................................................... 25 BCCI'S CRIMINALITY .................................................................................................................................. 49 BCCI'S RELATIONSHIP WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL BANKS, AND INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas
    An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas By Ryan Feeney 2008 Pulliam Kilgore Intern Bruce W. Sanford Bruce D. Brown Laurie A. Babinski BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Washington, D.C. Counsel to the Society of Professional Journalists September 2008 In the throes of the American Civil Rights movement as Southern blacks flexed their political might against segregation, a city commissioner in Alabama sued the country‟s most prominent newspaper, The New York Times. L.B. Sullivan‟s libel suit sought to silence the implication of his critics that he was part of a racist Southern oligarchy responsible for the violent suppression of black protests in Montgomery. It failed, and an uniquely American brand of free speech was born. In deciding that landmark free-speech case, New York Times v. Sullivan, 1 the U.S. Supreme Court noted how libel suits such as Sullivan‟s threatened “the very existence of an American press virile enough to publish unpopular views on public affairs.” Throughout modern American history, linking a person to an unpopular group has often led to a rash of libel suits against the press. It happened with communism in the 1940s, organized crime in the 1970s, and homosexuality in the 1980s under the stigmatizing glare of the AIDS epidemic. Yet in the more than four decades since the New York Times decision, American libel plaintiffs have found it acutely difficult to muzzle the press. But these free speech protections apply only on American soil, which means they cannot be used against the latest wave of libel litigants who bring suits overseas – foreigners accused of terrorism ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Brief on Second Circuit Decision
    Case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-FM Document 2140 Filed 10/17/2008 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) IN RE: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON ) Civil Action No. 03 MDL 1570 (GBD) SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ) ) ) This document relates to: All Actions SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON SECOND CIRCUIT DECISION October 17, 2008 Case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-FM Document 2140 Filed 10/17/2008 Page 2 of 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY............................................................................................1 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................4 I. THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S DECISION COMPELS DISMISSAL OF ALL OFFICIAL-CAPACITY CLAIMS AGAINST REMAINING FSIA DEFENDANTS ...................................................................................................................4 A. The FSIA Protects Individuals Acting in Their Official Capacity ..........................5 B. The Two Remaining Saudi Entities Are “Agencies or Instrumentalities” of Saudi Arabia...........................................................................6 C. The FSIA’s Torts Exception Does Not Apply Here ................................................9 D. The Commercial Activities Exception to the FSIA Does Not Apply Here.............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • M0285 OCR (CS 150Dpi).Pdf
    @[3(£cMarconi AVI()NICS House Journal of GEe-Marconi Avionics Limited Issue 2 PRINCE OF WALES MASSIVE DONATION HANDED OVER TO AWARD FOR GMAv MEDWAY SCANNER APPEAL A revolutionary new collections, sponsored swims, thermal imaging sensor, "The Gift is Right" - sales of books and other arti­ with wide application to John Colston cle s, and big social and sport­ "Some said it was ing events. All these - and emergency and security 'impossible' . Others said many more - have , together, services, has won the 1993 'extremely ambitious' ", said invol ve d thousands ·of ge ner­ "Prince of Wales Award Dr Mohan Ve lamati, Chairman ous people. for Innovation". of the Me dway Scanner Four Times Over Target! Appeal, re ferring to the Fund's The Aw ard was presente d £1 million target when he Over 70 pe ople re presenting jointly to GEC-Marconi came to Airport Works in all those who had de dicated Avionics, Sensors Division, April to re ceive a cheque for time and effort to our fund­ with GEC-Marconi Materials £101,445. raising were at the ce remony Technology and the Defence hosted by Divisional Manag­ Re se arch Agency. The ce re­ This spectacular contribu­ ing Director John Colston for mony took place at the UK Fire tion to the Fund has been the cheque handover. He said Service College at Moreton-in­ raised during the last two years "W hen a Committee was Marsh, Gl ouce stershire , and by the efforts of Rocheste r empl oyee s and their families forme d to co-ordinate the was broadcast during the Company's Appe al, we BBCl "Tomorrow's Worl d" taking part in, and contributing to, a host of events both thought a target of £25,000 programme on Wedne sday, serious and funny.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE, Vol. 154, Pt. 16
    22810 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE, Vol. 154, Pt. 16 September 27, 2008 LOFGREN, as much time as she may constrained by the first amendment and thus It prohibits a federal or state court from en- need. may provide less protection to defamation forcing a defamation judgment entered in an- Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California. I defendants than our Constitution requires. other country for publication involving a matter would certainly like to commend Con- (5) While our Nation’s courts will generally enforce foreign judgments as a matter of of public concern, unless the court first deter- gressman RODRIGUEZ and Senator comity, comity does not require that courts mines that the judgment is consistent with the SCHUMER. This is a measure that I sup- enforce foreign judgments that are repug- free-speech clause of our Constitution’s First port. nant to our Nation’s fundamental constitu- Amendment. Mr. Speaker, I would just like to note tional values, in particular its strong protec- H.R. 6146 responds to the problem of what there is another measure that we have tion of the right to freedom of speech. is sometimes called ‘‘libel tourism.’’ This is the marked up in the Judiciary Committee (6) Our Nation’s courts should only enforce disturbing practice of suing authors for defa- that would broadly assist our Amer- foreign judgments as a matter of comity mation in foreign countries rather than in the ican soldiers and their families. I hope when such foreign judgments are consistent United States, so as to avoid the speech-pro- with the right to freedom of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Undertakings of the Merger Between British Aerospace Plc And
    ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYPLC UNDERTAKINGS GIVEN TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY BY BRITISH AEROSPACE PLC PURSUANT TO S75G(l) OF THE FAIR TRADING ACT 1973 WHEREAS: (a) On 27 April 1999 British Aerospace pic ("BAE SYSTEMS") agreed with The General Electric Company pic ("GEC") the proposed merger ("the merger") of GEC's defence electronics business Marconi Electronic Systems ("MES") with BAE SYSTEMS; (b) The merger came within the jurisdiction of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings ("the EC Merger Regulation"); (c) Article 296 (ex Article 223) of the EC Treaty permits any Member State to take such measures as it considers necessary to protect its essential security interests which are connected with the production of or trade in arms, munitions and war material; (d) BAE SYSTEMS was requested, under the former Article 223(I)(b) of the EC Treaty, not to notify the military aspects of the merger to the European Commission under the EC Merger Regulation; (e) The military aspects of the merger were consequently considered by Her Majesty's Government under national merger control law; (f) The Secretary of State has power under section 75(1) of the Fair Trading Act 1973 to make a merger reference to the Competition Commission and, under section 7SG(l), to accept undertakings as an alternative to making such a reference; (g) The Secretary of State has requested that the Director General of Fair Trading seek undertakings from BAE SYSTEMS in order to remedy or prevent the adverse effects ofthe merger.
    [Show full text]
  • Integracija Evropske Obrambne Industrije
    UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Andrej Stres INTEGRACIJA EVROPSKE OBRAMBNE INDUSTRIJE Diplomsko delo Ljubljana 2007 UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Andrej Stres Mentor: doc. dr. Iztok Prezelj Somentor: asist. mag. Erik Kopač INTEGRACIJA EVROPSKE OBRAMBNE INDUSTRIJE Diplomsko delo Ljubljana 2007 INTEGRACIJA EVROPSKE OBRAMBNE INDUSTRIJE Diplomsko delo obravnava spremembe v evropski obrambni industriji vse od konca 2. svetovne vojne. Na začetku predstavi proces povezovanja obrambne industrije v času hladne vojne v treh časovnih obdobjih. Sledi predstavitev trendov povezovanja obrambne industrije po koncu hladne vojne, podkrepljenih z vzroki, ki spodbujajo in zavirajo proces povezovanja obrambne industrije v Evropi. Omenjeni proces, voden s strani obrambnih podjetij, je prikazan s pomočjo koncentracije, privatizacije in internacionalizacije obrambne industrije. Obravnava tudi liberalističen in merkantilističen pristop k integraciji obrambne industrije na primeru Velike Britanije in Francije. Proces institucionalne integracije obrambne industrije, ki predstavlja poskus meddržavnega povezovanja obrambne industrije, prikaže v študiji primerov najpomembnejših institucij na tem področju. V zadnjem poglavju s predstavitvijo slovenske obrambne industrije v obdobju po osamosvojitvi leta 1991 umesti obrambno industrijo v Sloveniji v evropsko dogajanje na tem področju ter nakaže možnosti za njen nadaljnji razvoj. Ključne besede: obrambna industrija, ekonomska integracija, Evropa, Slovenija. INTEGRATION OF EUROPEAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY This diploma work deals with changes in defence industry in Europe since the end of Second World War. At the begininng it divides the process of binding up the European defence industry in Cold War on three periods. It continues with the introduction of modern trends in binding up the defence industry after the end of Cold War with help by causes that stimulate and interfere the process of European defence integration.
    [Show full text]
  • "Legal Jihad": How Islamist Lawfare Tactics Are Targeting Free Speech
    "LEGAL JIHAD": HOW ISLAMIST LAWFARE TACTICS ARE TARGETING FREE SPEECH Brooke Goldstein andAaron Eitan Meyer* I. WELCOME TO LAWFARE .............................. 395 II. THE ISLAMIST MOVEMENT ............................. 396 III. LEGAL JIHAD ....................................... 397 IV. LAWFARE IN EUROPE & CANADA ....................... 400 V. ENGLAND .......................................... 402 V I. CANADA ........................................... 404 VII. THE NETHERLANDS .................................. 405 VEII. THE INTERNATIONAL SCENE ........................... 407 IX. CONCLUSION ....................................... 409 I. WELCOME TO LAWFARE Lawfare is usually defined as the use of the law as a weapon of war' or the pursuit of strategic aims through aggressive legal maneuvers.2 Traditionally, lawfare tactics have been used to obtain moral advantages over the enemy in the court of public opinion3 and to intimidate heads of state from acting out of fear of prosecution for war crimes.4 Al Qaeda training manuals instruct its captured * Brooke Goldstein is a practicing attorney, an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute, an award- winning filmmaker and director of the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum. The Legal Project is dedicated to providing pro-bono legal representation to authors, activists and publishers who work on the topics of radical Islam, terrorism and their sources of financing. Goldstein is the founder and director of the Children's Rights Institute, a not-for-profit dedicated to raising awareness about and legally combating the incitement and recruitment of children as suicide bombers. She is also the 2007 recipient of the E. Nathaniel Gates Award for Outstanding Public Advocacy. Aaron Eitan Meyer recently received his Juris Doctor degree from Touro Law Center, and serves as the assistant director at the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum as well as legal correspondent to the Terror Finance Blog.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Space Commerce
    Foreword from the Secretary of Commerce As the United States seeks opportunities to expand our economy, commercial use of space resources continues to increase in importance. The use of space as a platform for increasing the benefits of our technological evolution continues to increase in a way that profoundly affects us all. Whether we use these resources to synchronize communications networks, to improve agriculture through precision farming assisted by imagery and positioning data from satellites, or to receive entertainment from direct-to-home satellite transmissions, commercial space is an increasingly large and important part of our economy and our information infrastructure. Once dominated by government investment, commercial interests play an increasing role in the space industry. As the voice of industry within the U.S. Government, the Department of Commerce plays a critical role in commercial space. Through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Commerce licenses the operation of commercial remote sensing satellites. Through the International Trade Administration, the Department of Commerce seeks to improve U.S. industrial exports in the global space market. Through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the Department of Commerce assists in the coordination of the radio spectrum used by satellites. And, through the Technology Administration's Office of Space Commercialization, the Department of Commerce plays a central role in the management of the Global Positioning System and advocates the views of industry within U.S. Government policy making processes. I am pleased to commend for your review the Office of Space Commercialization's most recent publication, Trends in Space Commerce. The report presents a snapshot of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Aviation Management By
    1 Ph.D. Thesis COST EFFECTIVE LOW COST CARRIER (LCC) PAKISTAN AVIATION MANAGEMENT BY UNIFIED AIRCRAFT POLICY Dewan Abdullah Farooqui Department of Business Administration, Research Scholar, Greenwich University Karachi Contact: [email protected] Mobile: +92300-8225651 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Hiro Takahashi at Greenwich University 2 Abstract The study conducted for this thesis analyzes the aviation industry from the global perspective in general and from the Pakistan perspective in particular. The initial part of the research comprises of the in-depth study and the historical analysis of the global aviation scenario i.e. how the aviation industry has become a major and fastest source of transportation globally since the inception of regular air services in the earlier 20th century till to-date. Later part of this research focuses on the cost effective Low Cost Carrier (LCC) aviation model in Pakistan. To achieve the cost saving management, unified aircraft operation policy was proposed. To select right aircraft for Pakistan’s domestic and regional markets, multiple evaluation factors were considered for better matching of physical requirements. The unified aircraft fleet is a biggest factor to reduce the total operating cost. Moreover, the research on cost effective management by employing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) LCC based aviation business in Pakistan was also undertaken. An elaborated analysis of the operations and functioning of ERP in LCCs’ different business divisions with real-life analysis was conducted. It was concluded that ERP modified for unified aircraft policy will give the significant improvements of the value of operation compared to the Traditional Management, General ERP, and combination of both of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioners, V
    No. 13- IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 (AL RAJHI BANK, et al.) JOHN PATRICK O’NEILL, JR., et al., Petitioners, v. AL RAJHI BANK, SAUDI AMERICAN BANK, DAR AL-MAAL AL-ISLAMI TRUST, SALEH ABDULLAH KAMEL, DALLAH AL BARAKA GROUP LLC, Respondents. ___________ IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 (ASAT TRUST REG., et al.) JOHN PATRICK O’NEILL, JR., et al., Petitioners, v. ASAT TRUST REG., et al., Respondents. ___________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ___________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ___________ STEPHEN A. COZEN CARTER G. PHILLIPS* ELLIOTT R. FELDMAN RICHARD KLINGLER SEAN P. CARTER JACQUELINE G. COOPER J. SCOTT TARBUTTON RICHARD E. YOUNG COZEN O’CONNOR SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1900 Market Street 1501 K Street, N.W. Philadelphia, PA 19103 Washington, D.C. 20005 (215) 665-2000 (202) 736-8000 [email protected] Counsel for the Federal Insurance Petitioners September 9, 2013 * Counsel of Record [Additional Counsel on Inside Cover] ANDREA BIERSTEIN JAMES P. KREINDLER HANLY CONROY BIERSTEIN JUSTIN T. GREEN SHERIDAN FISHER & ANDREW J. MALONEY, III HAYES, LLP KREINDLER & KREINDLER 112 Madison Avenue LLP 7th Floor 750 Third Avenue New York, NY 10016 32nd Floor (212) 784-6400 New York, NY 10017 (212) 687-8181 Counsel for the EuroBrokers and Burnett Counsel for the Ashton Petitioners Petitioners ROBERT M. KAPLAN JERRY S. GOLDMAN FERBER CHAN ESSNER & ANDERSON KILL P.C. COLLER, LLP 1251 Avenue of the 530 Fifth Avenue Americas 23rd Floor New York, NY 10020 New York, NY 10036 (212) 278-1000 (212) 944-2200 Counsel for the O’Neill Counsel for the Petitioners Continental Petitioners CHRIS LEONARDO ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP 1875 Eye Street N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defence Industry in the 21St Century
    The Defence Industry in the 21st Century “With nine countries (and their collective industrial prowess) involved in its development, the F-35 repre- sents a new model of inter- national cooperation, ensuring affordable U.S. and coalition partner security well into the 21st century” – Sources: Photograph by US Department of Defense, Quote by Lockheed Martin Corporation Thinking Global … or thinking American? “With nine countries (and their collective industrial prowess) involved in its development, the F-35 represents a new model of international cooperation, ensuring affordable U.S. and coalition partner security well into the 21st century” – Sources: Photograph by US Department of Defense, Quote by Lockheed Martin Corporation Welcome The purpose of this paper is to provoke a debate. To stimulate further the dialogue we enjoy with our clients around the world. As the world’s largest professional services firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers works with clients in every segment of the defence industry – from the Americas to the whole of Europe; from the Middle East and Africa to Asia and the Pacific Rim. On many occasions, our discussions focus on the technical issues in which we are pre-eminently well-qualified to advise. Here, however, we seek to debate the issues that affect your industry. To review the factors that shaped today’s environment, to assess the implications for contractors and to look at the factors that might shape the future. Our views are set out in the following pages. We have debated some of these issues with some of our clients already but the time is right for a broader discus- sion.
    [Show full text]