DOCSLIB.ORG

New Aircraft Recognition Answer Sheets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Aircraft Recognition Answer Sheets Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 1 of 14 2E031961 - 5 Correct: ¢ Incorrect: \ x £ Student ID Number 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 Instructions: You will be given three (3) seconds to view each slide, after which you will be given fifteen (15) seconds for multiple choice questions and thirty (30) seconds for fill-in questions to mark the correct manufacturer, model number, and common name. For aircraft with no model number or common name, you must write the word “none” on your answer sheet. Leaving the space blank will result in the question being scored as incorrect. The first slide is a sample. Mark your answer on the cover sheet in the area below. 1 Sample Slide A Lopresti Piper E B-2 I None B Douglas F DC-3 J Belphegor C Northrop-Grumman G M-15 K Spirit D PZL-Mielec H None L Swift Fury Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 2 of 14 2E031961 - 5 1 Slide #1 A Aero E Yak-12M I Criquet B Yakovlev F MS-505 J Moose C Morane-Saulnier G L-60S K Creek D PZL H Yak-12A L Brigidyr 2 Slide #2 A BAE E CV-240 I Airliner B Convair F 41 J None C Saab G HS-748 K ATP D NAMC H 340 L Jetstream 3 Slide #3 A McDonnell Douglas E 100 I None B COMAC F 727 J Fellowship C Boeing G MD-80 K Super 80 D Fokker H ARJ-21 L Chengyang 4 Slide #4 A SIAI-Marchetti E L-70 I AirTrainer B Valmet F SF-260 J Vinka C PAC G L-90TP K None D Slingsby H CT-4 L RediGO 5 Slide #5 A Shenyang E Su-15 I Fishcan B Nanchang F J-7 J Finback-B C Sukhoi G J-8II K Fantan D Chengdu H Q-5 L Flagon Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 3 of 14 2E031961 - 5 6 Slide #6 A Aerospatiale E MH-53E I Pave Low B NH-Industries F MH-53 J Super Stallion C Agusta-Westland G CH-53E K Sea Dragon D Sikorsky H SA-321 L Super Frelon 7 Slide #7 A Avro E C.1 I Crane Mk1A B Cessna F CT-45 J Consul C Canadair G Mk.4 K Bobcat D Airspeed H T-50 L Anson 8 Slide #8 A SAFAT E 110 I Crane B Zlin F 43 J Koliber C PZL G C-106 K None D Safir H 03 L Bulldog 9 Slide #9 A Lockheed E RF-84 I Farmer B Dassault F MiG-19 J Thunder Streak C North American G MD-452 K Thunder Jet D Mikoyan Gurevich H F-84 L Mystere 10 Slide #10 A Alenia E C-27J I Transport B EADS CASA F C.160 J Hercules C Lockheed G G.222 K None D Transall H C-295 L Spartan Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 4 of 14 2E031961 - 5 11 Slide #11 A Ibis E PA-46 I None B Socata-Daher F M-101T J Spirit C Piper G Ae.270 K Meridian D Myasishchev H TBM-850 L Gazelle 12 Slide #12 A TAI E Mi-28 I Viper B Mil F EC-665 J None C Eurocopter G AH-1Z K Havoc D Bell H T-129 L Tigre 13 Slide #13 A Aero E Yak-12M I Criquet B Yakovlev F MS-505 J Moose C Morane-Saulnier G L-60S K Creek D PZL H Yak-12A L Brigidyr 14 Slide #14 A BAE E CV-240 I Airliner B Convair F 41 J None C Saab G HS-748 K ATP D NAMC H 340 L Jetstream 15 Slide #15 A McDonnell Douglas E 100 I None B COMAC F 727 J Fellowship C Boeing G MD-80 K Super 80 D Fokker H ARJ-21 L Chengyang Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 5 of 14 2E031961 - 5 16 Slide #16 A SIAI-Marchetti E L-70 I AirTrainer B Valmet F SF-260 J Vinka C PAC G L-90TP K None D Slingsby H CT-4 L RediGO 17 Slide #17 A Shenyang E Su-15 I Fishcan B Nanchang F J-7 J Finback-B C Sukhoi G J8II K Fantan D Chengdu H Q-5 L Flagon 18 Slide #18 A Aerospatiale E MH-53E I Pave Low B NH-Industries F MH-53 J Super Stallion C Agusta-Westland G CH-53E K Sea Dragon D Sikorsky H SA-321 L Super Frelon 19 Slide #19 A Avro E C.1 I Crane Mk1A B Cessna F CT-45 J Consul C Canadair G Mk.4 K Bobcat D Airspeed H T-50 L Anson 20 Slide #20 A SAFAT E 110 I Crane B Zlin F 43-M J Koliber C PZL G C-106 K None D Safir H 03 L Bulldog Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 6 of 14 2E031961 - 5 21 Slide #21 A Lockheed E F-84 I Farmer B Dassault F MiG-19 J Thunder Streak C Republic G MD-452 K Thunder Jet D Mikoyan Gurevich H F-84F L Mystere 22 Slide #22 A Alenia E C-27J I Transport B Airbus F C.160 J Hercules C Lockheed G G.222 K None D Transall H C-295 L Spartan 23 Slide #23 A Aero E PA-46 I None B Socata F M-101T J Ibis C Piper G Ae.270 K Meridian D Myasishchev H TBM-850 L Gazelle 24 Slide #24 A Agusta-Westland E Mi-28 I Viper B Mil F EC-665 J ATAK C Eurocopter G AH-1Z K Havoc D Bell H T-129 L Tigre 25 Slide #25 A Aero E Yak-12M I Criquet B Yakovlev F MS-505 J Moose C Morane-Saulnier G L-60S K Creek D PZL H Yak-12A L Brigidyr Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 7 of 14 2E031961 - 5 26 Slide #26 A BAE E CV-240 I Airliner B Convair F 41 J None C Saab G HS-748 K ATP D NAMC H 340 L Jetstream 27 Slide #27 A McDonnell Douglas E 100 I None B COMAC F 727 J Fellowship C Boeing G MD-80 K Super 80 D Fokker H ARJ-21 L Chengyang 28 Slide #28 A SIAI-Marchetti E L-70 I AirTrainer B Valmet F SF-260 J Vinka C PAC G L-90TP K None D Slingsby H CT-4 L RediGO 29 Slide #29 A Shenyang E Su-15 I Fishcan B Nanchang F J-7 J Finback-B C Sukhoi G J-8II K Fantan D Chengdu H Q-5 L Flagon 30 Slide #30 A Aerospatiale E MH-53E I Pave Low B NH-Industries F MH-53 J Super Stallion C Agusta-Westland G CH-53E K Sea Dragon D Sikorsky H SA-321 L Super Frelon Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 8 of 14 2E031961 - 5 31 Slide #31 A Avro E C.1 I Crane Mk1A B Cessna F CT-45 J Consul C Canadair G Mk.4 K Bobcat D Airspeed H T-50 L Anson 32 Slide #32 A SAFAT E 110 I Crane B Zlin F 43-M J Koliber C PZL G C-106 K None D Safir H 03 L Bulldog 33 Slide #33 A Lockheed E RF-84 I Farmer B Dassault F MiG-19 J Thunder Streak C North American G MD-452 K Thunder Jet D Mikoyan Gurevich H F-84 L Mystere 34 Slide #34 A Alenia E C-27J I Transport B EADS CASA F C.160 J Hercules C Lockheed G G.222 K None D Transall H C-295 L Spartan 35 Slide #35 A Ibis E PA-46 I None B Socata F M-101T J Spirit C Piper G Ae270 K Meridian D Myasishchev H TBM-850 L Gazelle Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 9 of 14 2E031961 - 5 36 Slide #36 A TAI E Mi-28 I Viper B Mil F EC-665 J None C Eurocopter G AH-1Z K Havoc D Bell H T-129 L Tigre 37 Slide #37 A Aero E Yak-12M I Criquet B Yakovlev F MS-505 J Moose C Morane-Saulnier G L-60S K Creek D PZL H Yak-12A L Brigidyr 38 Slide #38 A BAE E CV-240 I Airliner B Convair F 41 J None C Saab G HS-748 K ATP D NAMC H 340 L Jetstream 39 Slide #39 A McDonnell Douglas E 100 I None B COMAC F 727 J Fellowship C Boeing G MD-80 K Super 80 D Fokker H ARJ-21 L Chengyang 40 Slide #40 A SIAI-Marchetti E L-70 I AirTrainer B Valmet F SF-260 J Vinka C PAC G L-90TP K None D Slingsby H CT-4 L RediGO Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 10 of 14 2E031961 - 5 41 Slide #41 A Shenyang E Su-15 I Fishcan B Nanchang F J-7 J Finback-B C Sukhoi G J-8II K Fantan D Chengdu H Q-5 L Flagon 42 Slide #42 A Aerospatiale E MH-53E I Pave Low B NH-Industries F MH-53 J Super Stallion C Agusta-Westland G CH-53E K Sea Dragon D Sikorsky H SA-321 L Super Frelon 43 Slide #43 A Avro E AS.65 I Crane Mk1A B Cessna F CT-45 J Consul C Canadair G Mk.4 K Bobcat D Airspeed H T-50 L Anson 44 Slide #44 A SAFAT E 110 I Crane B Zlin F 43-M J Koliber C PZL G C-106 K None D Safir H 03 L Bulldog 45 Slide #45 A Lockheed E F-84 I Farmer B Dassault F MiG-19 J Thunder Streak C Republic G MD-452 K Thunder Jet D Mikoyan Gurevich H F-84F L Mystere Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 11 of 14 2E031961 - 5 46 Slide #46 A Alenia E C-27J I Transport B EADS CASA F C.160 J Hercules C Lockheed G G.222 K None D Transall H C-295 L Spartan 47 Slide #47 A Ibis E PA-46 I None B Socata-Daher F M-101T J Spirit C Piper G Ae.270 K Meridian D Myasishchev H TBM-850 L Gazelle 48 Slide #48 A TAI E Mi-28 I Viper B Mil F EC-665 J None C Eurocopter G AH-1Z K Havoc D Bell H T-129 L Tigre 49 Slide #49 A Agusta-Westland E CH-124 I King Stallion B KAI F FZ-23 J Frelon C Sikorsky G H-123 K None D NH Industries H NH-90 L Sea King 50 Slide #50 A Air Tractor E AB-270 I Turbo Thrush B Aero Borero F AT-802 J Dromader C Ayres G M-18 K Ibis D PZL H S2G L None Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 12 of 14 2E031961 - 5 Slide #51 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 51 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #52 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 52 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #53Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 53 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #54 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 54 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 13 of 14 2E031961 - 5 Slide #55 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 55 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #56 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 56 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #57 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 57 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #58 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 58 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Student: Answer Key Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 14 of 14 2E031961 - 5 Slide #59 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 59 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Slide #60 Write in: Manufacturer/Model Number/Name 60 For Judge Use Only: 0 1 2 3 Student: _ Test: 2019 Nationals Aircraft Recognition Test Page: 1 of 14 2E031961 - 6 Correct: ¢ Incorrect: \ x £ Student ID Number 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 Instructions: You will be given three (3) seconds to view each slide, after which you will be given fifteen (15) seconds for multiple choice questions and thirty (30) seconds for fill-in questions to mark the correct manufacturer, model number, and common name.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Committee Ministry of Transportation Republic of Indonesia 2012
    FINAL KNKT.12.05.09.04 NNAATTIIOONNAALL TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN SSAAFFEETTYY CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Sukhoi Civil Aircraft Company Sukhoi RRJ–95B; 97004 Mount Salak, West Java Republic of Indonesia 9 May 2012 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMITTEE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA 2012 This Final report was produced by the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC), 3rd Floor Ministry of Transportation, Jalan Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia. The report is based upon the investigation carried out by the NTSC in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization, the Indonesian Aviation Act (UU No. 1/2009) and Government Regulation (PP No. 3/2001). Readers are advised that the NTSC investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, the NTSC reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As the NTSC believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, acknowledging the NTSC as the source. When the NTSC makes recommendations as a result of its investigations or research, safety is its primary consideration. However, the NTSC fully recognizes that the implementation of recommendations arising from its investigations will in some cases incur a cost to the industry. Readers should note that the information in NTSC reports and recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RL30730 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Russian Fighter Aircraft Industrial Base: Parallels with the United States? November 8, 2000 Christopher Bolkcom Analyst in National Defense Ellen Schwarzler Research Associate Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress This CRS Report was prepared at the request of Representative James Talent. It has been released for general congressional use with his permission. Russian Fighter Aircraft Industrial Base: Parallels with the United States? Summary There are many differences between the fighter aircraft industry in the United States and in Russia. The United States has traditionally produced its weaponry within a capitalist framework which allowed free enterprise and competition between companies in private industry. The former Soviet Union’s economy, and its fighter aircraft industry was based on a Marxist, command economy, where the central government dictated the type and number of aircraft produced and allocated resources for construction. Once among the most glamorous components of the Soviet military industrial complex, the Russian military aircraft industry has been described by some analysts as being on the verge of collapse. Russia’s civilian aircraft industry has faced similar pressures, which does not bode well for the military aviation infrastructure. It may be difficult for fighter aircraft companies to find employment in Russia’s beleaguered civil aircraft sector. The Russian government has attempted to reform its fighter aircraft industrial base and make it more efficient and competitive with western industry. It has initiated several reforms aimed at reducing the stratification and compartmentalization of industrial processes, as well as improving access to financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • DCS: Su-27 Flanker Flight Manual
    [SU-27] DCS DCS: Su-27 Flanker Eagle Dynamics i Flight Manual DCS [SU-27] DCS: Su-27 for DCS World The Su-27, NATO codename Flanker, is one of the pillars of modern-day Russian combat aviation. Built to counter the American F-15 Eagle, the Flanker is a twin-engine, supersonic, highly manoeuvrable air superiority fighter. The Flanker is equally capable of engaging targets well beyond visual range as it is in a dogfight given its amazing slow speed and high angle attack manoeuvrability. Using its radar and stealthy infrared search and track system, the Flanker can employ a wide array of radar and infrared guided missiles. The Flanker also includes a helmet-mounted sight that allows you to simply look at a target to lock it up! In addition to its powerful air-to-air capabilities, the Flanker can also be armed with bombs and unguided rockets to fulfil a secondary ground attack role. Su-27 for DCS World focuses on ease of use without complicated cockpit interaction, significantly reducing the learning curve. As such, Su-27 for DCS World features keyboard and joystick cockpit commands with a focus on the most mission critical of cockpit systems. General discussion forum: http://forums.eagle.ru ii [SU-27] DCS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... VI SU-27 HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 2 ADVANCED FRONTLINE FIGHTER PROGRAMME .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sukhoi's Fullback
    TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED Sukhoi Fullback by Dr Carlo Kopp While the region has seen the deployment and from the wide fuselage tunnel. As a result of this manufacture of hundreds of Flankers since the the aircraft’s effective wing loading is much lower early 1990s, all of these have been incremen- than that of aircraft with different configurations. tal developments of the baseline Su-27S and This is reflected in superb high alpha handling and Su-27UB tandem seat airframes. sustained turn rates. The enlarged LERX/canards Since the early 1980s the Sukhoi bureau has been migrated to a range of other Flanker variants, in- developing a family of derivative airframes, which cluding the Su-35, Su-37 and production Su-30MKI. utilise side by side seating. With ongoing industry Experience from initial Su-27K flight testing and speculation about regional buys of these aircraft, trials indicated that major issues would arise with this month’s analysis will explore the features, capa- training pilots for carrier recoveries. Without the bilities and growth potential of the Fullback family large range of aircraft types, and specialised carrier of Flanker derivatives. trainers operated by the US Navy, the Soviet AV-MF needed an aircraft which was identical in handling Sukhoi Su-27KUB to the basic Su-27K but dual seated, without the for- The navalised Su-27K for Korabl’ny was devel- ward visibility impediments of the existing tandem oped for the Project 1143.5 55,000 tonne class air- configuration Su-27UB. craft carrier, of which four were to have been built. Design of the dual navalised combat trainer de- The Su-27K is the Russian equivalent to the US Navy rivative began in 1989, the aim being to produce an F-14, but also important as it was the prototype for airframe suitable for a range of other carrier based design features which migrated to a wide range of roles such as reconnaissance, aerial refuelling, mari- other Flanker variants and derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth in the Governance of the Cold War Divide Mikoyan's
    Economic Growth in the Governance of the Cold War Divide Mikoyan’s Encounter with Japan, Summer 1961 ✣ Oscar Sanchez-Sibony Noguchi Yoshio had written to him after all. Anastas Mikoyan had been re- tired for ten years. The year was 1975, and to mark Mikoyan’s 80th birthday, Noguchi had sent the retired Soviet official a souvenir.1 He was not the only one to remember Mikoyan in his retirement. Writing in 1972 on the occasion of his oil company’s 60th anniversary, the redoubtable Idemitsu Sazo sent to Mikoyan—in the somewhat bewildered words of then-Soviet ambassador to Japan Oleg Troyanovskii—a “piece of cloth.”2 Matsubara Yosamatsu, presi- dent of the industrial and shipbuilding conglomerate Hitachi Zosen, chose a more personal note. In his letter, he recounted to Mikoyan the first time they met in August 1961 during Mikoyan’s tour of the corporation’s shipyard in Sakurajima, as well as their encounter a year later when Matsubara headed a delegation of Japanese businessmen in Moscow. “Ten years have passed since then,” he wistfully wrote to the Old Bolshevik. “And in that time, economic relations between our two countries strengthen with every year as trade rela- tions develop between our countries even more greatly.”3 Meanwhile, Prime Minister Sato Eisaku also recalled that fateful year, writing in his personal letter to Mikoyan: “I am sincerely glad that relations between Japan and the Soviet Union, especially after your visit to Japan in 1961, continue to develop 1. Mikoyan’s thank-you note dates from 1 December 1975 and is stored in Russian State Archive of Sociopolitical History (RGASPI), Fond (F.) 84, Opis’ (Op.) 3, Delo (D.) 108, List (L.) 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough Orders Breathe Life Into
    R16 Aviation International News • www.ainonline.com September 17-19, 2003 September 17-19, 2003 Aviation International News • www.ainonline.com R17 commonality with the other CFM56-5s cargo variants. The first extended-fuselage An-148 assembly line, AVIC I used in the rest of the A320 family. An-74TK-300, now under assembly at the Kharkov has so far com- ARJ21 KhGAAP factory in Kharkov, will enter pleted the wing box and ANTONOV duty as a freighter for a Ukrainian cargo outer panels for the first An-74TK-300–After completing a 219- hauler. Antonov still has not decided prototype. Ulan-Ude con- mission flight-test program essentially on whether it will offer a stretched version of tinues work on the second schedule, Antonov and the Kharkov State the airplane in passenger configuration. assembly line, while the Aviation Production Company (KhGAPP) The An-74TK-300 uses 14,300-pound- Antonov plant in Kiev won AP-25 certification for the An-74TK- thrust ZMKB Progress D36-4A turbofans, nears completion of the modified to fit into the program’s third fuselage, Antonov under-wing nacelles, whose intended for structural test- An-74TK-300 additional noise-reduction ing. It plans to roll out the panels render the airplane first example this Decem- ICAO Stage 4 compliant. ber and fly it in March. Under the current Show, represents China’s most comprehen- Unlike the D36s found on schedule, the next two prototypes will fol- sive effort to build an international supplier earlier An-74s, the -4A low at four-month intervals. base for an indigenous aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Client Update U.S. Issues Guidance on Sanctions Relating to Russia's
    Client Update 1 October 30, 2017 Client Update U.S. Issues Guidance on Sanctions Relating to Russia’s Defense and Intelligence Sectors On Friday, October 27, the U.S. Department of State issued public guidance on the implementation of Section 231 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). Section 231 of CAATSA requires the U.S. President to impose potential sanctions against individuals or entities that knowingly engage in “significant transactions” with persons that are a part of, or operating for or on behalf of, Russia’s defense or intelligence sectors. An overview of CAATSA is provided in our Client Update of July 28, 2017. The new guidance is accompanied by a list of entities considered to be operating in Russia’s defense or intelligence sectors. The guidance indicates, however, that not all large transactions with the listed entities will be considered “significant.” Rather, the State Department will focus largely on defense-related or intelligence-related transactions. Section 231 of CAATSA authorizes sanctions for conduct engaged on or after August 2, 2017, with any sanctions imposed becoming effective on or after January 29, 2018. The State Department also has stated that it intends, when possible, to “work with” persons contemplating transactions with the listed persons to help avoid sanctionable transactions. DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE SECTORS Over thirty entities, listed in the appendix to this update, are identified in the guidance as persons that are part of, or operating for or on behalf of, Russia’s defense or intelligence sectors. As the State Department’s guidance makes clear, the entities named in the guidance are not subject to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Flight Data Management Unit (Ifdmu)
    By Bernard Fi tzsimons ast approaching a first flight currentl y scheduled for Decem­ ber, the Sukhoi Superjet 100 is barely a yearawayfromits inauguraldeliveryto launch cuFstomerAeroflot in November 2008. The develop ment , prod uction and testing efforts areramping up accord­ ingly. Alenia Aeronautica has taken a 25 ,--_ ~9 ._ percent stake in Sukhoi Civil Aircraft ... __ -", Co. (SCAC) and will set up a joint ven­ ture in Italy to provide marketing and (Top) Flight deck of the new Sukhoi Superjet 100 regional jet with Thales avion­ after-sales support outside Russia and ics suite was inspired by the cockpit layout of the Airbus A380. (Bottom) One of the Comm onwealt h of Independent the two systems integration benches used by Thales in Toulouse, France. One States. Boeing has expanded its long­ bench was to be moved to Moscow by the end of the year. standing consultancy role. Airframes are underassembly at Komsomolsk­ France's Th ales, meanwhile, is devel­ nition phase with Suk hoi that started on-Amur in the Russian Far East and oping the new regionaljet's avionics before the contract award and contin­ undergoing tests by TsAGI, the Central under a $120 million contract signed ued afterward . Aerohydrod ynamic Institut e, at Mos­ last year that covers the specification, Program managerLionel Rouchouse cow's Zhukovskyair base. The PowerJet design, validation and integration of said the company has around 270 people joint venture of Snecma and Russia'5 the complete suite through certification, working full time on the Superjet pro­ NPO Saturn is building and testing plus the first 50 shipsets of hardware.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancra-Signs-Contract-With-Irkut Copy
    For Immediate Release Ancra Signs Contract with Irkut for MC-21 Lower Deck Cargo Loading Systems MOSCOW, RU — Ancra International, LLC has signed a contract with Irkut Corporation to develop and deliver the lower deck cargo loading systems for the new MC-21-200 and MC-21-300 mainline passenger aircraft. Each aircraft has the option of a manual or powered-loading system – using 2-inch Power Drive Units – with all four systems being developed simultaneously. Integral to the design is an offering to the operator for future upgrade from manual to powered capability. The powered systems leverage technology from Ancra’s 747-400 and A330 converted freighter main deck powered cargo loading systems and are designed to load and unload IATA 40/1 and 50/0 containers with reduced manpower. Critical Design Review is scheduled for December 2015 and the first system delivery is scheduled in August 2016. “We are excited to be part of the Irkut team as they bring their decades of experience designing and building aircraft to the 150-210 passenger aircraft market space. This program is a blessing for us as we take our own extensive main deck cargo loading system experience and expand it into the passenger lower deck domain.” says Ed Dugic, Director of Sales and Marketing for Ancra Aircraft Systems. About Ancra International Ancra International was founded in 1969 to serve the cargo handling industry with a complete line of cargo restraint and conveyance equipment for the air, truck, and rail markets. Since its inception, Ancra International’s Aircraft Systems Division has evolved to become an international leader in the design and manufacture of aircraft cargo handling and restraint systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Air Force and European Security 1946-1998
    Introduction The United States Army Air Forces became an independent service, the United States Air Force, in 1947-the second year, supposedly, of “peace.” In reality there had just begun a long conflict between the United States and its allies and the Soviet Union and the satellite states subject to it. In 1949 lhe United States and most of the non-Communist countries of Europe signed the North Atlantic Treaty. The United States Air Force, which had been only a token presence on the continent since the end of World War 11, once more crossed the Atlantic in strength. The commitment of that service to peace and security in Europe, which continues still, has been the longest of its history. This pamphlet attempts to give the general reader some sense of the role the USAF has played in Europe since the end of World War 11. It contains three sections. The first reviews the reasons for the origins of the Cold War and describes the strategic concerns that drove the United States to commit itself to the military defense of distant lands. The second section reviews the higher strategy of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) with special reference to the central role of air power. The final section reviews the history of the United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) in order to show the many ways in which the United States Air Force has served American national- security policy on the continent. This section is closely based on a brief history of USAFE prepared by Dr. Daniel Harrington of USAFE’s history office.
    [Show full text]
  • YAKOVLEV Yak-1 YAKOVLEV Yak-3
    Last updated 1 December 2020 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| YAKOVLEV Yak-1 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 8188 • Yak-1 1342 (to Soviet AF as 1342) fcd. landing gear-up on frozen Polonets Lake, Demjansk, northern Russia after combat with Luftwaffe fighters 12.42 (recov. from Polonets Lake 10.90) Historic Aircraft Collection: imported to UK 8.91 G-BTZD Guy Black/ Historic Aircraft Collection, Jersey 10.12.91/20 (rest. Audley End 92/96, Earls Colne Suffolk 99/03, continues 08 by Retrotec in Sussex, using the original Klimov M-105P engine) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 08110 • Yak-1B (to Soviet AF as ……): built .42 (flown by Hero of the Soviet Union Lt. General Yeremin) Mr. Golovatyi: farmer 31st Guard Fighter Regiment (static rest. at Saratov Aircraft Plant) Saratov Museum, Russia 04/06 _______________________________________________________________________________________ 12222 • Yak-1 forced landing on frozen surface of Lake Krivoe, Murmansk region, sank 28.8.43 (wreck salvaged from lake 11.6.12) Vadim Zadorozhny Museum of Technology, Moscow 12/20 (complete airframe, displ. in forced landing diorama) _______________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]