A Floral and Faunal Biodiversity Assessment of Prey Long

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Floral and Faunal Biodiversity Assessment of Prey Long A Floral and Faunal Biodiversity Assessment of Prey Long Compiled and Edited by Annette Olsson & David Emmett Conservation International - Cambodia Program Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen Forestry Administration November 2007 FORESTRY ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN The work described in this report was conducted in May 2007 by Conservation International, Cambodia Program, Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen, and the Forestry Administration. The work focused on an assessment of the floral and faunal diversity of Prey Long Forest, located in Kratie and Stung Treng provinces, Cambodia. Citation: Olsson, A. and Emmett, D. E. 2007 (Edts.) A Floral and Faunal Biodiversity Assessment of Prey Long. Conservation International, Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen, and Forestry Administration. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Front cover Photos: Top: Grassland in lowland evergreen forest, Prey Long Bottom, left: Banteng Bos javanicus captured on camera trap by CI in Prey Long in 2005. Bottom, center: Asian leaf turtle Cyclemys tcheponensis recorded by the Cambodian Turtle Conservation Team in Prey Long in 2007. Bottom, right: Malayan sun bear Helarctos malayanus captured on camera trap by CI in Prey Long in 2005. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents.........................................................................................3 Introduction .................................................................................................5 BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE AND CONSERVATION STATUS ..............................5 PROJECT OBJECTIVES................................................................................6 CONSERVATION CONCESSIONS ..................................................................7 PROJECT DESIGN .......................................................................................8 BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS...............................................................................9 Evergreen trees of Prey Long....................................................................11 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................11 METHODS ................................................................................................12 RESULTS ..................................................................................................12 EVALUATION OF SPECIES DIVERSITY WITHIN TRANSECTS .......................22 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................22 Bears...........................................................................................................24 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................24 METHODS ................................................................................................24 RESULTS ..................................................................................................25 O’Krack Surveys..................................................................................25 O’Long Surveys....................................................................................26 Interviews ............................................................................................26 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................27 Pangolins ....................................................................................................28 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................28 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................28 RESULTS ..................................................................................................29 Presence, status and threats.................................................................29 Local hunting methods.........................................................................29 Trade and value ...................................................................................30 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................30 Otters..........................................................................................................31 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................31 METHODS ................................................................................................31 RESULTS ..................................................................................................32 Presence and status..............................................................................32 Hunting and trade................................................................................33 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................34 Tortoises & Freshwater Turtles................................................................35 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................35 METHODS ................................................................................................35 RESULTS ..................................................................................................36 3 Threats to Turtles.................................................................................37 Species Accounts..................................................................................37 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................39 Amphibians, Snakes & Lizards.................................................................40 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................40 METHODS ................................................................................................40 RESULTS ..................................................................................................41 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................41 Freshwater Fishes ......................................................................................42 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................42 METHODS ................................................................................................42 RESULTS ..................................................................................................42 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................43 Records of other priority species ..............................................................44 Summary ....................................................................................................46 SITE SUMMARY ........................................................................................46 SPECIES SUMMARY ..................................................................................46 Additional Information on Threats ..........................................................48 WILDLIFE TRADE ....................................................................................48 DISEASE TRANSMISSION TO WILDLIFE .....................................................48 TIMBER, NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS, AND LAND CLEARANCE .........49 References ..................................................................................................50 Appendix 1. Satellite image of Prey Long...................................................52 Appendix 2. Checklist of faunal species recorded in Prey Long..................53 Appendix 3. Species recorded in May 2007 survey and their conservation status............................................................................................................56 Appendix 4. Reference table to determine bear species based on scratch marks...........................................................................................................58 Appendix 5. List of villages where pangolin interviews were conducted ....58 Appendix 6. List of villages where otter interviews were conducted...........58 Appendix 7. Amphibian species recorded from Prey Long during surveys in 2007.............................................................................................................59 Appendix 8. Snake and lizard species recorded from Prey Long during surveys in 2007............................................................................................59 Appendix 9. Freshwater fishes captured during survey at Prey Long ..........60 Appendix 10. Freshwater fish species recorded from Prey Long during surveys in 2007............................................................................................61 Appendix 11. List of wildlife found at Siambok and Thalaboryvat district Stung Treng Province ..................................................................................62 Appendix 12. List of prices for wildlife traded in Prey Long area...............62 Appendix 13. Survey photographs ..............................................................63 Appendix 14. Deciduous trees of Prey Long...............................................68 4 Introduction Peov Somanak, Jake Brunner & Ida Theilade BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE AND CONSERVATION STATUS The Prey Long region contains the largest area of wet lowland evergreen forest
Recommended publications
  • ONEP V09.Pdf
    Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern OEPP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume nine OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 60/1 SOI PIBULWATTANA VII, RAMA VI RD., BANGKOK 10400 THAILAND TEL. (662) 2797180, 2714232, 2797186-9 FAX. (662) 2713226 Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 First published : September 2000 by Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP), Thailand. ISBN : 974–87704–3–5 This publication is financially supported by OEPP and may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non–profit purposes without special permission from OEPP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation : Nabhitabhata J., Chan ard T., Chuaynkern Y. 2000. Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. Authors : Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan–ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern National Science Museum Available from : Biological Resources Section Natural Resources and Environmental Management Division Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Science Technology and Environment 60/1 Rama VI Rd. Bangkok 10400 THAILAND Tel. (662) 271–3251, 279–7180, 271–4232–8 279–7186–9 ext 226, 227 Facsimile (662) 279–8088, 271–3251 Designed & Printed :Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Tel. (662) 585–2076, 586–0837, 913–7761–2 Facsimile (662) 913–7763 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chec List Amphibians and Reptiles, Romblon Island
    Check List 8(3): 443-462, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Amphibians and Reptiles, Romblon Island Group, central PECIES Philippines: Comprehensive herpetofaunal inventory S OF Cameron D. Siler 1*, John C. Swab 1, Carl H. Oliveros 1, Arvin C. Diesmos 2, Leonardo Averia 3, Angel C. ISTS L Alcala 3 and Rafe M. Brown 1 1 University of Kansas, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Biodiversity Institute, Lawrence, KS 66045-7561, USA. 2 Philippine National Museum, Zoology Division, Herpetology Section. Rizal Park, Burgos St., Manila, Philippines. 3 Silliman University Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management, Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental, Philippines. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We present results from several recent herpetological surveys in the Romblon Island Group (RIG), Romblon Province, central Philippines. Together with a summary of historical museum records, our data document the occurrence of 55 species of amphibians and reptiles in this small island group. Until the present effort, and despite past studies, observations of evolutionarily distinct amphibian species, including conspicuous, previously known, endemics like the forestherpetological frogs Platymantis diversity lawtoni of the RIGand P.and levigatus their biogeographical and two additional affinities suspected has undescribedremained poorly species understood. of Platymantis We . reportModerate on levels of reptile endemism prevail on these islands, including taxa like the karst forest gecko species Gekko romblon and the newly discovered species G. coi. Although relatively small and less diverse than the surrounding landmasses, the islands of Romblon Province contain remarkable levels of endemism when considered as percentage of the total fauna or per unit landmass area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Annotated Checklist of the Amphibians and Reptiles of the Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary in Northern Cambodia
    Asian Herpetological Research 2013, 4(1): 36–55 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1245.2013.00036 A Preliminary Annotated Checklist of the Amphibians and Reptiles of the Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary in Northern Cambodia Timo HARTMANN1*, Flora IHLOW1*, Sarah EDWARDS2, SOVATH Sothanin3, Markus HANDSCHUH4 and Wolfgang BÖHME1 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany 2 Frontier Cambodia, 390, Sangkat Boeung Keng Kang III, Khan Chamkarmon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 3 Department of National Parks, Ministry of Environment (MoE), 48, Samdech Preah Sihanouk, Tonle Bassac, Khan Chamkarmorn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 4 Angkor Centre for Conservation of Biodiversity (ACCB), Kbal Spean, Phnom Kulen National Park, Siem Reap, Cambodia Abstract We present the first herpetological checklist for the Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary in northern Cambodia, with records of 22 species of amphibians and 33 species of reptiles belonging to 44 genera in 22 families. The checklist includes three species (Ingerophrynus macrotis, Micryletta inornata, Scincella melanosticta) which in Cambodia were formerly only known to occur in the Cardamom Mountains in the southwest of the country. Our findings highlight the importance of countrywide herpetological baseline surveys in lowland habitats. Keywords Amphibia, Reptilia, Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia, distribution, range extension, taxonomy 1. Introduction 2011; Rowley et al., 2010; Stuart et al., 2006, 2010). Herpetological field work focussing on lowlands and In addition to historical compilations (Bourret, 1941, low-lying hills of northern Central Cambodia is still very 1942; Saint Girons, 1972), recent field surveys greatly little (Bezuijen et al., 2009; Hartmann et al., 2009, 2010, improved the knowledge on Cambodia’s herpetofauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment Study for New
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 50159-001 July 2019 Technical Assistance Number: 9461 Regional: Protecting and Investing in Natural Capital in Asia and the Pacific (Cofinanced by the Climate Change Fund and the Global Environment Facility) Prepared by: Lorenzo V. Cordova, Jr. M.A., Prof. Pastor L. Malabrigo, Jr. Prof. Cristino L. Tiburan, Jr., Prof. Anna Pauline O. de Guia, Bonifacio V. Labatos, Jr., Prof. Juancho B. Balatibat, Prof. Arthur Glenn A. Umali, Khryss V. Pantua, Gerald T. Eduarte, Adriane B. Tobias, Joresa Marie J. Evasco, and Angelica N. Divina. PRO-SEEDS DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines Asian Development Bank is the executing and implementing agency. This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. Biodiversity Assessment Study for New Clark City New scientific information on the flora, fauna, and ecosystems in New Clark City Full Biodiversity Assessment Study for New Clark City Project Pro-Seeds Development Association, Inc. Final Report Biodiversity Assessment Study for New Clark City Project Contract No.: 149285-S53389 Final Report July 2019 Prepared for: ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550, Metro Manila, Philippines T +63 2 632 4444 Prepared by: PRO-SEEDS DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC C2A Sandrose Place, Ruby St., Umali Subdivision Brgy. Batong Malake, Los Banos, Laguna T (049) 525-1609 © Pro-Seeds Development Association, Inc. 2019 The information contained in this document produced by Pro-Seeds Development Association, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Change in the Panay Mountain Range from 2014 to 2017
    Biodiversity Change in the Panay Mountain Range from 2014 to 2017 Imprint This publication is by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH through the Forest and Climate Protection in Panay-Phase II (ForClim II) Project, funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) under its International Climate Initiative. BMU supports this Initiative based on a decision of the German Parliament. For more information, see http://www.international-climate-initiative.com. As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn Ground Floor Forest Management Bureau Annex Building Department of Environment and Natural Resources Compound Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines T +63 2 697 3127 Programme: Forest and Climate Protection in Panay – Phase II Author: Ruth Martinez Photo credits/sources: ©GIZ/Bernie Agaloos ©GIZ/Haribon Foundation ©GIZ/Jürgen Schade Forest and Climate Protection in Panay-Phase II Project URL links: This publication contains links to external websites. Responsibility for the content of the listed external sites always lies with their respective publishers. When the links to these sites were first posted, GIZ checked the third-party content to establish whether it could give rise to civil or criminal liability. However, the constant review of the links to external sitescannot reasonably be expected without concrete indication of a violation of rights. If GIZ itself becomes aware or is notified by a third party that an external site it has provided a link to gives rise to civil or criminal liability, it will remove the link to this site immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs: Skulls in Motion
    Topics in Functional and Ecological Vertebrate Morphology, pp. 15-46. P. Aerts, K. D’Août, A. Herrel & R. Van Damme, Eds. © Shaker Publishing 2002, ISBN 90-423-0204-6 Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs: Skulls in Motion Keith Metzger Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, USA. Abstract This chapter reviews various aspects of cranial kinesis, or the presence of moveable joints within the cranium, with a concentration on lepidosaurs. Previous studies tend to focus on morphological correlates of cranial kinesis, without taking into account experimental evidence supporting or refuting the presence of the various forms of cranial kinesis in these taxa. By reviewing experimental and anatomical evidence, the validity of putative functional hypotheses for cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs is addressed. These data are also considered with respect to phylogeny, as such an approach is potentially revealing regarding the development of various forms of cranial kinesis from an evolutionary perspective. While existing evidence does not allow for events leading to the origin of cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs to be clearly understood at the present time, the potential role of exaptation in its development for specific groups (i.e., cordylids, gekkonids, varanids) is considered here. Directions for further research include greater understanding of the distribution of cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs, investigation of intraspecific variation of this feature (with a focus on ontogenetic factors and prey properties as variables which may influence the presence of kinesis), and continued study of the relationship between experimentally proven observation of cranial kinesis and cranial morphology. Key words: cranial kinesis, lepidosaur skull, functional morphology. Introduction Cranial kinesis, or the presence of moveable joints within the cranium, has been a subject of considerable interest to researchers for more than a century (for references see Bock, 1960; Frazzetta, 1962; Smith, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • New Record of Banded Krait Bungarus Fasciatus
    Biological Forum – An International Journal 12(1): 29-32(2020) ISSN No. (Print): 0975-1130 ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3239 New Record of Banded Krait Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider, 1801) from Ranchi (Jharkhand) with its Preying on Checkered Keel-Back Snake Akhlaq Husain (Former Scientist E. Zoological Survey of India) 41, Hari Vihar, Vijay Park, Chakrata Road, Dehra Dun-248001, Uttarakhand, India. (Corresponding author: Akhlaq Husain) (Received 20 February 2020, Accepted 04 April, 2020) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: In India Banded Krait Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider, 1801) commonly occurs in north-eastern India (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura) but becomes lesser towards north-west, west, south and south-east (Uttarakhand in north-west; Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh in central India; Maharashtra in west; Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu in south and Andhra Pradesh and Odisha in south-east). In Jharkhand it was recorded from Bokaro and Hazaribagh districts but presently it has been found in Ranchi district also, preying on Checkered Keel-back Snake which is a new record and adds to its distribution in the state. In present communication its synonymy, diagnostic features, altitudinal range, distribution, habitat, food & feeding, breeding, nature & behaviour, bite, venom & treatment, conservation status, threats and preying on Checkered Keel-back Snake are provided. Keywords: New record of Banded Krait from Ranchi with its preying on Checkered Keel-back Snake. INTRODCUCTION The records of distribution of Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider, 1801), the Banded Krait, in Jharkhand State have been from Bokaro and Hoshangabad districts only (Wikipedia; telegraphindia.com). During present study, a Banded Krait, preying on Checkered Keel-back snake (Fowlea piscator, Schneider, 1799), was sighted at Ormanjhi in Ranchi district which was found to be the new find from Ranchi and additional record for the state.
    [Show full text]
  • P. 1 AC27 Inf. 7 (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement
    AC27 Inf. 7 (English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Twenty-seventh meeting of the Animals Committee Veracruz (Mexico), 28 April – 3 May 2014 Species trade and conservation IUCN RED LIST ASSESSMENTS OF ASIAN SNAKE SPECIES [DECISION 16.104] 1. The attached information document has been submitted by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of * Nature) . It related to agenda item 19. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. AC27 Inf. 7 – p. 1 Global Species Programme Tel. +44 (0) 1223 277 966 219c Huntingdon Road Fax +44 (0) 1223 277 845 Cambridge CB3 ODL www.iucn.org United Kingdom IUCN Red List assessments of Asian snake species [Decision 16.104] 1. Introduction 2 2. Summary of published IUCN Red List assessments 3 a. Threats 3 b. Use and Trade 5 c. Overlap between international trade and intentional use being a threat 7 3. Further details on species for which international trade is a potential concern 8 a. Species accounts of threatened and Near Threatened species 8 i. Euprepiophis perlacea – Sichuan Rat Snake 9 ii. Orthriophis moellendorfi – Moellendorff's Trinket Snake 9 iii. Bungarus slowinskii – Red River Krait 10 iv. Laticauda semifasciata – Chinese Sea Snake 10 v.
    [Show full text]
  • (Riparian, Agricultural and Residential) Along the River of Barangay Mananum, Bag-O, Medina, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
    J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017 Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online) Vol. 11, No. 5, p. 274-286, 2017 http://www.innspub.net RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Diversity of anuran of the three different habitat types (Riparian, Agricultural and Residential) along the River of Barangay Mananum, Bag-o, Medina, Misamis Oriental, Philippines Naomi J. Cero, Edelyn B. Gonzales, Lord Elgin J. Ladera, Cordulo P. Ascano II, Gina C. Lacang* Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro, Philippines Article published on November 30, 2017 Key words: Anurans, Habitat, Diversity, Canonical correspondence analysis Abstract Anuran belongs to the group of amphibians that are sensitive to the alterations of their environment and they could be used as bio-indicator organisms to follow changes in their habitats. The diversity of anurans was studied in the three sites located along the river of Mananum, Bag-o, Misamis Oriental, Philippines. Visual encounter survey was used to capture the target species. Diversity indices such as species richness, relative abundance, Shannon-Weiner function, evenness, similarity index were analyzed. Environmental variables were measured to know the species-habitat relationships using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA). Results of the study revealed that the area is composed of 6 species of anurans namely: Rana magna, Hylarana signata, Polypedates leucomystax, Occidozyga laevis, Limnonectes leytensis and Rhinella marina. It was found out that riparian area has the highest species richness and showed higher diversity index compared from the two areas. Based from CCA, it was found out that the area is composed of three (3) habitat types namely: forested; shrub land; and rocky area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amphibian and Reptile Diversity of Tràm Chim National Park, Đống Tháp Province, Việt Nam Alex Krohn SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2009 The Amphibian and Reptile Diversity of Tràm Chim National Park, Đống Tháp Province, Việt Nam Alex Krohn SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Krohn, Alex, "The Amphibian and Reptile Diversity of Tràm Chim National Park, Đống Tháp Province, Việt Nam" (2009). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 689. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/689 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Amphibian and Reptile Diversity of Tràm Chim National Park, Đống Th áp Province, Vi ệt Nam Alex Krohn SIT: Vietnam Mekong Delta Spring 2009 Krohn 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Acknowledgements………..………………………………………….……………3 2.0 Abstract…………...………………………………………………….…..………….4 3.0 Introduction..………………………………………………………………………...5 4.0 Materials and Methods…………………………………..………………….……..8 5.0 Results……..………………………………………………………………..……..12 6.0 Discussion..…………………………………………………………………….….16 6.1 Overall Diversity and its Implications for Conservation………………...……..16 6.2 Natural History Notes………………………………………………………….….21 6.3 Problems and Advice for Future Research………………………………….….24 6.4 Conclusion……………………………………………………..…………….…….26 Table 1………………………………………………………..…………………...……27 Appendix 1……………………………………………………………………..………30 Literature Cited………………………………………………………………………...37 Krohn 2 1.0 Aknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank everyone at Tram Chim National Park for their help.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of XY Sex Chromosomes in a Boa and Python
    Current Biology, Volume 27 Supplemental Information The Discovery of XY Sex Chromosomes in a Boa and Python Tony Gamble, Todd A. Castoe, Stuart V. Nielsen, Jaison L. Banks, Daren C. Card, Drew R. Schield, Gordon W. Schuett, and Warren Booth Figure S1. PCR validation of male-specific RAD markers in boa and python. Related to Figure 1. A. Male-biased amplification of RAD marker TCBoa_2918 in eleven male and eleven female Boa imperator. Individual specimen ID numbers are listed below the gel image. B. Male-biased amplification of RAD marker TCBoa_2918 in an additional eight male and eleven female Boa imperator. Individual specimen ID numbers are listed below the gel image. C. Photograph of South American Boa (Boa constrictor) from Goiás, Brazil. D. Male-biased amplification of RAD marker TCBoa_2918 in three male and three female Boa constrictor. Individual specimen ID numbers are listed below the gel image. E. Male-biased amplification of RAD marker M3 in twelve male and twelve female Python bivittatus. Individual specimen ID numbers are listed below the gel image in panel F. F. Male-specific restriction digest of PCR amplicon (PCR-RFLP) from RAD marker M10 in twelve male and twelve female Python bivittatus. Individual specimen ID numbers are listed below the gel image. G. Cartoon illustrating PCR amplicons from the python RAD marker M10. The X and Y alleles are illustrated including the approximate position of the Y chromosome-specific SpeI restriction site. H. Gel image of python RAD marker M10 showing difference between digested and undigested PCR amplicons from a male Python bivittatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles of Phetchaburi Province, Western Thailand: a List of Species, with Natural History Notes, and a Discussion on the Biogeography at the Isthmus of Kra
    The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 3(1): 23-53, April 2003 ©2003 by Chulalongkorn University Reptiles of Phetchaburi Province, Western Thailand: a list of species, with natural history notes, and a discussion on the biogeography at the Isthmus of Kra OLIVIER S.G. PAUWELS 1*, PATRICK DAVID 2, CHUCHEEP CHIMSUNCHART 3 AND KUMTHORN THIRAKHUPT 4 1 Department of Recent Vertebrates, Institut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, 29 rue Vautier, 1000 Brussels, BELGIUM 2 UMS 602 Taxinomie-collection – Reptiles & Amphibiens, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, FRANCE 3 65 Moo 1, Tumbon Tumlu, Amphoe Ban Lat, Phetchaburi 76150, THAILAND 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, THAILAND ABSTRACT.–A study of herpetological biodiversity was conducted in Phetcha- buri Province, in the upper part of peninsular Thailand. On the basis of a review of available literature, original field observations and examination of museum collections, a preliminary list of 81 species (12 chelonians, 2 crocodiles, 23 lizards, and 44 snakes) is established, of which 52 (64 %) are reported from the province for the first time. The possible presence of additional species is discussed. Some biological data on the new specimens are provided including some range extensions and new size records. The herpetofauna of Phetchaburi shows strong Sundaic affinities, with about 88 % of the recorded species being also found south of the Isthmus of Kra. A biogeographic affinity analysis suggests that the Isthmus of Kra plays the role of a biogeographic filter, due both to the repeated changes in climate during the Quaternary and to the current increase of the dry season duration along the peninsula from south to north.
    [Show full text]