DOCSLIB.ORG

T.9.11 Pipeline LP.V5 4/9/03 4:47 PM Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T.9.11 Pipeline LP.V5 4/9/03 4:47 PM Page 1 Cover_sd.qxd 4/11/03 3:45 PM Page 1 2002 ANNUAL REPORT 2002 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT TC PIPELINES, LP focus discipline RESULTS TC PipeLines, LP is a United States limited partnership that offers investors stable cash flow and growth prospects through TC PIPELINES, LP 450 – First Street SW Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 participation in the natural gas transmission industry. TC PipeLines owns a 30 percent interest in Northern Border Pipeline Company and a 49 percent interest in toll-free (877) 290-2772 facsimile (403) 920-2350 www.tcpipelineslp.com Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company. Both Northern Border Pipeline and Tuscarora own interstate pipeline systems that transport western Canadian natural gas to growing natural gas consuming markets in the midwestern United States and northern Nevada areas, respectively. The Partnership is managed by its general partner, TC PipeLines GP, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited, a leading North American energy company. Common units of TC PipeLines are listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market and trade under the symbol “TCLP”. Highlights 1 Letter to Unitholders 2 Form 10-K 3 Financial Statements F-1 Cover_sd.qxd 4/11/03 3:45 PM Page 1 2002 ANNUAL REPORT 2002 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT TC PIPELINES, LP focus discipline RESULTS TC PipeLines, LP is a United States limited partnership that offers investors stable cash flow and growth prospects through TC PIPELINES, LP 450 – First Street SW Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 participation in the natural gas transmission industry. TC PipeLines owns a 30 percent interest in Northern Border Pipeline Company and a 49 percent interest in toll-free (877) 290-2772 facsimile (403) 920-2350 www.tcpipelineslp.com Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company. Both Northern Border Pipeline and Tuscarora own interstate pipeline systems that transport western Canadian natural gas to growing natural gas consuming markets in the midwestern United States and northern Nevada areas, respectively. The Partnership is managed by its general partner, TC PipeLines GP, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited, a leading North American energy company. Common units of TC PipeLines are listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market and trade under the symbol “TCLP”. Highlights 1 Letter to Unitholders 2 Form 10-K 3 Financial Statements F-1 Cover_sd.qxd 4/11/03 3:45 PM Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF TC PIPELINES, LP OF TC PIPELINES, LP OUR ASSETS (December 31, 2002) (December 31, 2002) Albrecht W.A. Bellstedt Ronald J. Turner 1 OUR GOAL IS TO DELIVER STABLE, SUSTAINABLE CASH FLOWS Executive Vice-President, Law and General Counsel President and Chief Executive Officer 2 TransCanada PipeLines Limited Calgary, Alberta Russell K. Girling TO OUR UNITHOLDERS AND TO FIND OPPORTUNITIES TO INCREASE CASH Chief Financial Officer Russell K. Girling Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer Paul F. MacGregor DISTRIBUTIONS WHILE MAINTAINING OUR LOW-RISK PROFILE. TransCanada PipeLines Limited Vice-President, Business Development Calgary, Alberta Donald R. Marchand (2)(4) Vice-President and Treasurer 1 Northern Border Robert A. Helman Pipeline Company Partner Ronald L. Cook 2 Tuscarora Gas Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw Transmission Company Vice-President, Taxation Chicago, Illinois Theresa Jang Jack F. Jenkins-Stark (2)(3) Controller Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE TUSCARORA Silicon Energy Corp. Rhondda E.S. Grant TC PIPELINES OWNERSHIP 30% 49% Alameda, California Secretary ACQUIRED BY TC PIPELINES May 28, 1999 September 1, 2000 David L. Marshall (1)(4) COMMENCED OPERATIONS 1982 1995 Retired Vice-Chairman and Chief Financial Officer ORIGINATES NEAR Port of Morgan, MT Malin, OR The Pittston Company TERMINATES NEAR North Hayden, IN Wadsworth, NV OUR STRATEGY Incline Village, Nevada LENGTH (MILES) 1,249 240 (1) Chair, Audit Committee 1 RECEIPT CAPACITY (MMcfd ) 2,373 182 (2) Dennis J. McConaghy Member, Audit Committee Focus on natural gas transmission assets that (3) Chair, Conflicts Committee EQUITY INCOME – TC PIPELINES’ SHARE 42.1 42.8 Executive Vice-President, Gas Development (4) 38.1 •are underpinned with long-term TransCanada PipeLines Limited Member, Conflicts Committee Calgary, Alberta 30.0 10.0 transportation contracts Ronald J. Turner • have organic growth potential Executive Vice-President, Operations and Engineering 4.7 15.0 5.0 TransCanada PipeLines Limited 3.6 •connect to growing natural gas Calgary, Alberta 0.9 00 01 02 00 01 02 consuming markets 0 0 •connect to growing natural gas supply CASH DISTRIBUTIONS – TC PIPELINES’ SHARE 49.2 INVESTOR RELATIONS INTERNET SITE 42.9 Theresa Jang www.tcpipelineslp.com 40.5 Leverage from TransCanada’s expertise Controller Telephone: (877) 290-2772 K-1 INFORMATION 30.0 in natural gas transmission industry 10.0 Facsimile: (403) 920-2350 Telephone: (877) 699-1091 Email: [email protected] STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING 4.6 Maintain strong financial position 15.0 5.0 OFFICES Nasdaq Stock Market: TCLP 2.4 110 Turnpike Road, Suite 203 1.5 Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 00 01 02 00 01 02 AUDITORS 0 0 Telephone: (508) 871-7046 1 KPMG LLP Millions of cubic feet per day. Facsimile: (508) 871-7047 Calgary, Alberta 450 – First Street SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1 TRANSFER AGENT Telephone: (877) 290-2772 Mellon Investor Services LLC Facsimile: (403) 920-2350 Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Telephone: (800) 756-3353 Please recycle April 2003 Printed in Canada Designed and produced by Cover_sd.qxd 4/11/03 3:45 PM Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF TC PIPELINES, LP OF TC PIPELINES, LP OUR ASSETS (December 31, 2002) (December 31, 2002) Albrecht W.A. Bellstedt Ronald J. Turner 1 OUR GOAL IS TO DELIVER STABLE, SUSTAINABLE CASH FLOWS Executive Vice-President, Law and General Counsel President and Chief Executive Officer 2 TransCanada PipeLines Limited Calgary, Alberta Russell K. Girling TO OUR UNITHOLDERS AND TO FIND OPPORTUNITIES TO INCREASE CASH Chief Financial Officer Russell K. Girling Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer Paul F. MacGregor DISTRIBUTIONS WHILE MAINTAINING OUR LOW-RISK PROFILE. TransCanada PipeLines Limited Vice-President, Business Development Calgary, Alberta Donald R. Marchand (2)(4) Vice-President and Treasurer 1 Northern Border Robert A. Helman Pipeline Company Partner Ronald L. Cook 2 Tuscarora Gas Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw Transmission Company Vice-President, Taxation Chicago, Illinois Theresa Jang Jack F. Jenkins-Stark (2)(3) Controller Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE TUSCARORA Silicon Energy Corp. Rhondda E.S. Grant TC PIPELINES OWNERSHIP 30% 49% Alameda, California Secretary ACQUIRED BY TC PIPELINES May 28, 1999 September 1, 2000 David L. Marshall (1)(4) COMMENCED OPERATIONS 1982 1995 Retired Vice-Chairman and Chief Financial Officer ORIGINATES NEAR Port of Morgan, MT Malin, OR The Pittston Company TERMINATES NEAR North Hayden, IN Wadsworth, NV OUR STRATEGY Incline Village, Nevada LENGTH (MILES) 1,249 240 (1) Chair, Audit Committee 1 RECEIPT CAPACITY (MMcfd ) 2,373 182 (2) Dennis J. McConaghy Member, Audit Committee Focus on natural gas transmission assets that (3) Chair, Conflicts Committee EQUITY INCOME – TC PIPELINES’ SHARE 42.1 42.8 Executive Vice-President, Gas Development (4) 38.1 •are underpinned with long-term TransCanada PipeLines Limited Member, Conflicts Committee Calgary, Alberta 30.0 10.0 transportation contracts Ronald J. Turner • have organic growth potential Executive Vice-President, Operations and Engineering 4.7 15.0 5.0 TransCanada PipeLines Limited 3.6 •connect to growing natural gas Calgary, Alberta 0.9 00 01 02 00 01 02 consuming markets 0 0 •connect to growing natural gas supply CASH DISTRIBUTIONS – TC PIPELINES’ SHARE 49.2 INVESTOR RELATIONS INTERNET SITE 42.9 Theresa Jang www.tcpipelineslp.com 40.5 Leverage from TransCanada’s expertise Controller Telephone: (877) 290-2772 K-1 INFORMATION 30.0 in natural gas transmission industry 10.0 Facsimile: (403) 920-2350 Telephone: (877) 699-1091 Email: [email protected] STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING 4.6 Maintain strong financial position 15.0 5.0 OFFICES Nasdaq Stock Market: TCLP 2.4 110 Turnpike Road, Suite 203 1.5 Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 00 01 02 00 01 02 AUDITORS 0 0 Telephone: (508) 871-7046 1 KPMG LLP Millions of cubic feet per day. Facsimile: (508) 871-7047 Calgary, Alberta 450 – First Street SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1 TRANSFER AGENT Telephone: (877) 290-2772 Mellon Investor Services LLC Facsimile: (403) 920-2350 Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Telephone: (800) 756-3353 Please recycle April 2003 Printed in Canada Designed and produced by T.9.11 Pipeline LP.v5 4/9/03 4:47 PM Page 1 HIGHLIGHTS AS A RESULT OF INCREASED CASH FLOWS FROM NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE AND TUSCARORA, TC PIPELINES RAISED ITS QUARTERLY CASH DISTRIBUTION FROM $0.50 PER UNIT TO $0.525 PER UNIT EFFECTIVE FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2002, MARKING THE PARTNERSHIP’S THIRD 2.50 2.40 DISTRIBUTION INCREASE IN THREE YEARS. 2.08 2.00 Also in 2002, Tuscarora completed the construction of its expansion facilities, consisting of two compressor stations and an 11-mile extension and commissioned those facilities 1.00 for service on December 1. The expansion has increased Tuscarora’s capacity by approximately 42 percent. With the expansion capacity fully contracted for terms ranging 00 01 02 0 from ten to fifteen years, TC PipeLines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pipeline Authority Annual Report 2018
    North Dakota Pipeline Authority Annual Report July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018 Industrial Commission of North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, Chairman Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring North Dakota Pipeline Authority Annual Report July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018 Overview At the request of the North Dakota Industrial Commission, the Sixtieth Legislature passed House Bill 1128 authorizing the North Dakota Pipeline Authority. It was signed into law on April 11, 2007. The statutory mission of the Pipeline Authority is “to diversify and expand the North Dakota economy by facilitating development of pipeline facilities to support the production, transportation, and utilization of North Dakota energy-related commodities, thereby increasing employment, stimulating economic activity, augmenting sources of tax revenue, fostering economic stability and improving the State’s economy”. As established by the Legislature, the Pipeline Authority is a builder of last resort, meaning private business would have the first opportunity to invest in and/or build additional needed pipeline infrastructure. By law, the Pipeline Authority membership is comprised of the members of the North Dakota Industrial Commission. Upon the recommendation of the Oil and Gas Research Council, the Industrial Commission authorized the expenditure of up to $325,000 during the 2017-2019 biennium for the Pipeline Authority with funding being made available from the Oil and Gas Research Fund. On August 1, 2008 the Industrial Commission named Justin J. Kringstad, an engineering consultant, to serve as Director of the North Dakota Pipeline Authority. The North Dakota Pipeline Authority Director works closely with Lynn Helms, Department of Mineral Resources Director, Ron Ness, North Dakota Petroleum Council President and Karlene Fine, Industrial Commission Executive Director.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pipeline Transportation System Energy Market Assessment
    National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie Permission to Reproduce Materials may be reproduced for personal, educational and/or non-profit activities, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the National Energy Board, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the National Energy Board is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the National Energy Board. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail: [email protected] Autorisation de reproduction Le contenu de cette publication peut être reproduit à des fins personnelles, éducatives et/ou sans but lucratif, en tout ou en partie et par quelque moyen que ce soit, sans frais et sans autre permission de l’Office national de l’énergie, pourvu qu’une diligence raisonnable soit exercée afin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information reproduite, que l’Office national de l’énergie soit mentionné comme organisme source et que la reproduction ne soit présentée ni comme une version officielle ni comme une copie ayant été faite en collaboration avec l’Office national de l’énergie ou avec son consentement.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Mainline Sales and Marketing
    Fort Nelson ALBERTA H U D S O N B AY Fort St. John Canadian Mainline Gordondale Sales and Marketing Fort McMurray Grande Prairie SASKATCHEWAN MANITOBA Edmonton NGTL J A M TransGas ONTARIO E S B L A K A E Y W I N N R I E TransGas Centra P Union Nipigon V E I G R Saskatoon Calstock Empress Centrat MDA E Suffield SSDA SSDA WDA WDA Union C N Foothills Pipelines Liebenthal Centram NDA E ALL R T Shackleton NDA (Alberta) Richmond W Bayhurst A BURS MDA L Alberta/B.C. Calgary Success QUEBEC 2 Herbert T CABRI Tunis Power S 5 HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee ng Cranbrook 9 CARON NDA 13 Welwyn 391 REGINA TransCanada Canadian Mainline GRENFELL Medicine 17 AY OCK Hat Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN Lethbridge Moose Welwyn RAPID CITY AGE CALST Kingsgate 392 25 HEARST Jaw Regina RT KLOTZLAKE MATTICE Gros Cacouna NEW 30 GERALDTON 88 PO 86 KAPUSKASING LA PRAIRIE VERMILION B JELLICOE 84 92 P. E . I . KENORA YDEN 80 95 BRUNSWICK Foothills Pipeline B.C. 34 DR Moosomin ALCON LAKE 52 77 393 ILE DES CHENES F 49 Hearst Cochrane Winnipeg SPRUCE 55 45 IGNACE Kapuskasing Energir NDA 41 RTIN 394 Brandon 43 NIPIGON 58 MA 99 Dryden EAGLEHEAD Kenora 75 Iroquois Sa CANADA 60 UPSALA 102 Falls Energir EDA 69 ALLS 1 Spruce 62 Larslan 105 Québec City U.S.A. Nipigon Union Fredericton 2 1 POTTER Saint John Emerson #1 68 Halifax 3 Emerson #2 107 EDA Enbridge RAMORE TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK F 110 EDA LACHENAIE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Principles Surrounding the New Canadian and American Arctic Energy Debate
    LEGAL PRINCIPLES SURROUNDING THE NEW CANADIAN AND AMERICAN ARCTIC ENERGY DEBATE Alexander J. Black* "The Arctic trails have their secret tales That would make your blood run cold" ' I. INTRODU~~ION Almost a quarter century ago, great plans were made by Canada and the United States to build a natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the contiguous forty-eight states. However, the project stalled and has only been reinvigorated recently. This article identifies some of the unresolved legal issues surrounding the Alaska Highway gas pipeline project and competing proposals concerning connection to Canada's Mackenzie Delta. My underlying theme is security of supply, a concern that has increased in importance following the act of war by terrorists in New York City on September 11, 2001. These legal issues and business proposals should be reconciled quickly in order to ensure security of supply between Canada and the United States. Both countries share strategic mutual interests. Thus, this article presents a synthesis of the legal issues in an attempt to advance the longstanding comity between our countries through informed and timely decision making. Ultimately, a decision has to be made about the 1977 bilateral international agreement, aimed at transporting natural gas from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska through Canada to the contiguous forty-eight states. The original project was called the Foothills (or Alaska Highway) project by Canadians, while Americans often called it the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS). That acronym, ANGTS, sounds like 'angst', suggesting that some anxiety might exist about the outcome of this complicated project. Indeed this project has caused its share of angst over the past twenty-five years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report Letter to Shareholders 4 CSR Performance Highlights 10 Corporate Governance 11 Investor Information 182
    Contents Company Snapshot 1 Enbridge Inc. Investment Proposition 2 2016 Annual Report Letter to Shareholders 4 CSR Performance Highlights 10 Corporate Governance 11 Investor Information 182 Bringing new energy to energy “Today, there’s a new energy around energy, and Enbridge is better positioned than ever to be a leader in North America’s energy future. Our combination with Spectra Energy has made us an even bigger force in energy infrastructure in North America, and sets us upfordecadestocome.” – Al Monaco, President & CEO, Enbridge Inc. Life Takes Energy® We’recommittedtoconnectingpeopletotheenergyweall need to fuel our quality of life, and we do that in three key ways: We Transport Energy No one is better equipped to deliver energy than Enbridge. We operate the world’s largest and most sophisticated transportation network for crude oil and liquids; and we move approximately 20 percent of all natural gas consumed in the U.S. We take pride in delivering it all with an unrelenting focus on safety. We Distribute Energy Our customers rely on the clean-burning natural gas we deliver to cook their food and heat their homes, water and workplaces. As owner and operator of Canada’s two largest natural gas distribution companies, we provide safe, reliable service to 3.5 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and New York State. We Generate Energy Forward-Looking Information Our focus on the future of energy and sustainability This Annual Report includes references to forward-looking information. By its nature this information applies certain has led us to become a major and growing renewable assumptions and expectations about future outcomes, so energy company.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Proxy Group Merril Lynch Cost of Market September October
    Page 1 of 2 CASES 09-E-0715 et al. Staff Finance Panel Exhibit___(FP-9) Summary:Calculation of Cost of Equity for RG&E - Staff Proxy Group Merril Lynch Cost of Market Required Implied September 12.00% 11.90% October 11.90% 11.80% November 12.00% 11.90% Merril Lynch Cost of Markee 11.92% (Avg.09/09-11/09) Market Risk Premium 8.10% Treasury Rates2 10 year 30 year Sep-09 3.40% 4.19% Oct-09 3.39% 4.19% Nov-09 3.40% 4.31% Average 3.40% 4.23% Risk Free Rate (9/09 - 11/09) 3.81% Proxy Group Beta(Median) 0.70 Proxy Group OCF ROE 9.63% Traditional CAPM ROE 9.49% Zero Beta CAPM ROE 10.09% Generic (Average) CAPM ROE 9.79% 2/3 OCF & 1/3 CAPM Weighting 9.68% Credit Quality Adjustment 0.18% Issuance Cost Adjustment 0.00% ROM Adjustment 0.10% Recommended ROE 9.76% Page 2 of 2 CASES 09-E-0715 et al. Staff Finance Panel Exhibit___(FP-9) Summary: Calculation of Cost of Equity for NYSEG- Staff Proxy Group Merril Lynch Cost of Market Required Implied September 12.00% 11.90% October 11.90% 11.80% November 12.00% 11.90% Men"i1 Lynch Cost of Market1 11.92% (Avg. 09/09-11/09) Market Risk Premium 8.10% Treasury Rates2 10 year 30 year Sep-09 3.40% 4.19% Oct-09 3.39% 4.19% Nov-09 3.40% 4.31% Average 3.40% 4.23% Risk Free Rate (9/09 - 11/09) 3.81% Proxy Group Beta(Median) 0.70 Proxy Group OCF ROE 9.63% Traditional CAPM ROE 9.49% Zero Beta CAPM ROE 10.09% Generic (Average) CAPM ROE 9.79% 2/3 DCF & 1/3 CAPM Weighting 9.68% Credit Quality Adjustment 0.02% Issuance Cost Adjustment 0.00% ROM Adjustment 0.10% Recommended ROE 9.61~ 1Merrill Lynch cost of market figure is average of Implied and Required Returns for the 3 months ending November 2009 2Federal Reserve Statistical Release, FRS: Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 - Historical Data Website: 'http://federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/ Page 1 of 3 CASES 09-E-0715 et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership Annual
    ALLIANCE PIPELINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 April 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS.........................................................................................................................3 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................9 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 10 CORPORATE STRUCTURE.................................................................................................................. 12 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS...................................................................................... 12 General .................................................................................................................................................12 Recent Developments ..........................................................................................................................14 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ....................................................................................................... 15 The Alliance Pipeline System................................................................................................................15 RISK FACTORS.................................................................................................................................. 27 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Management's Discussion and Analysis
    ENBRIDGE INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS December 31, 2014 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) dated February 19, 2015 should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge or the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). All financial measures presented in this MD&A are expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Additional information related to the Company, including its Annual Information Form, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. OVERVIEW Enbridge, a Canadian Company, is a North American leader in delivering energy. As a transporter of energy, Enbridge operates, in Canada and the United States, the world's longest crude oil and liquids transportation system. The Company also has significant and growing involvement in natural gas gathering, transmission and midstream businesses and an increasing involvement in power transmission. As a distributor of energy, Enbridge owns and operates Canada's largest natural gas distribution company and provides distribution services in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and New York State. As a generator of energy, Enbridge has interests in more than 2,200 megawatts (MW) (1,600 MW net) of renewable and alternative energy generating capacity and is expanding its interests in wind, solar and geothermal facilities. Enbridge employs more than 11,000 people, primarily in Canada and the United States. The Company’s activities are carried out through five business segments: Liquids Pipelines; Gas Distribution; Gas Pipelines, Processing and Energy Services; Sponsored Investments; and Corporate, as discussed below.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Financial Highlights
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Financial Highlights ADJUSTED EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST, TAX, DEPRECIATION 2018 DISTRIBUTABLE CASH FLOW AND AMORTIZATION (ADJUSTED EBITDA) 600 12% Iroquois 500 5% PNGTS 400 26% GTN 300 18% Northern Border 200 14% Bison 100 14% Great Lakes 0 3% Tuscarora 8% North Baja 2008(a) 2009(a) 2010 2011(a) 2012(a) 2013(a) 2014 2015(a) 2016(a) 2017 2018 (a) Recast information Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 (millions of dollars, except unit amounts) Cash Flow Distributable cash flow (1) 391 310 313(4) 290(4) 255(4) Cash distributions paid 218 284 250 228 212 Class B Distributions paid 15 22 12 - - Income Statement Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interests (182) 252 248(4) 37(4) 195(4) Adjusted earnings (1) 317 252 248(4) 236(4) 195(4) EBITDA (1) 27 445 433(4) 223(4) 401(4) Adjusted EBITDA (1) 526 445 433(4) 422(4) 401(4) Balance Sheet Total assets (2) 2,899 3,559 3,354(4) 3,459(4) 3,343 Long-term debt (2) (including current maturities) 2,118 2,415 1,920(4) 1,980(4) 1,689 Partners’ equity 699 1,068 1,272(4) 1,391(4) 1,818(4) Common Unit Statistics (per unit) Cash distributions paid 2.95 3.88 3.66 3.46 3.30 Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (2.68) 3.16 3.21 (0.03) 2.67 Adjusted earnings per common unit – basic and diluted (1) 4.18 3.16 3.21 3.03 2.67 Common Units Outstanding (millions) Units issued (3) 0.7 3.2 3.1 0.7 1.3 Weighted average for the year (3) 71.3 69.2 65.7 63.9 62.7 End of year (3) 71.3 70.6 67.4 64.3 63.6 (1) Distributable cash flow, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per common unit are non-GAAP measures.
    [Show full text]
  • TC PIPELINES, LP 1999 Annual Report
    TCPipelinesFolder.kk 4/19/00 10:26 AM Page 1 TC PIPELINES, LP BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE INVESTOR RELATIONS GENERAL PARTNER OF GENERAL PARTNER OF 1999 TC PIPELINES, LP TC PIPELINES, LP Theresa Jang (March 21, 2000) (March 21, 2000) Controller Annual Telephone: 1-877-290-2772 (toll-free) Russell K. Girling Garry P. Mihaichuk Report Senior Vice-President and President and Facsimile: (403) 261-3599 Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer email: [email protected] TransCanada PipeLines Limited Calgary, Alberta Russell K. Girling OFFICES Chief Financial Officer Robert A. Helman Four Greenspoint Plaza Partner Paul F. MacGregor 16945 Northchase Drive Mayer, Brown & Platt Vice-President, Houston, Texas 77060 Chicago, Illinois Business Development Telephone: (281) 873-7774 Jack F. Jenkins-Stark Donald R. Marchand Senior Vice-President and Vice-President and Treasurer Chief Financial Officer 801 – 7th Avenue SW GATX Capital Gary G. Penrose Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P7 San Francisco, California Vice-President, Taxation Telephone: 1-877-290-2772 (toll-free) David L. Marshall Facsimile: (403) 261-3599 Karyn A. Brooks Corporate Director Vice-President Green Valley, California INTERNET SITE Garry P. Mihaichuk Theresa Jang www.tcpipelineslp.com Senior Vice-President and Controller President, Transmission STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING TransCanada PipeLines Limited Rhondda E.S. Grant Calgary, Alberta Secretary Nasdaq National Market Symbol: TCLPZ Walentin Mirosh Senior Vice-President, Corporate Strategy and Business Development AUDITORS TransCanada PipeLines Limited Calgary, Alberta KMPG LLP Calgary, Alberta Ronald J. Turner Senior Vice-President and TRANSFER AGENT President, International TransCanada PipeLines Limited ChaseMellon Calgary, Alberta Shareholder Services, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • MD&A and Financial Statements
    ENBRIDGE INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS December 31, 2013 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) dated February 14, 2014 should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge or the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2013, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). All financial measures presented in this MD&A are expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Additional information related to the Company, including its Annual Information Form, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. In connection with the preparation of the Company’s first quarter consolidated financial statements, an error was identified in the manner in which the Company historically recorded deferred regulatory assets associated with the difference between depreciation expense calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP and negotiated depreciation rates recovered in transportation tolls for certain of its regulated operations. The error was not material to any of the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements; however, as discussed in Note 4, Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements, to the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2013, prior year comparative financial statements have been revised to correct the effect of this error. This non-cash revision did not impact cash flows for any prior period. The discussion and analysis included herein is based on revised financial results for the year ended December 31, 2013 or other comparative periods as indicated. OVERVIEW Enbridge, a Canadian Company, is a North American leader in delivering energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Supplemental EIS for the Keystone XL Project
    Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 2 Keystone XL Project Description of the Proposed Project and Alternatives 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 2.2.1 Introduction As noted in the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) guidelines, alternatives provide decision makers and the public a range of reasonable choices in addition to the proposed action (i.e., the proposed Project), and form the heart of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1502.14). This Final Supplemental EIS considers three categories of alternatives, consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including the No Action Alternative, major pipeline route alternatives, and other alternatives considered but eliminated from detailed analysis. This section describes these alternatives and the screening process to determine whether they should be carried forward for detailed analysis in this Final Supplemental EIS. This section also includes detailed discussions of major route variations and other alternatives considered. 2.2.2 Overview of Alternatives The following section provides an overview of the alternatives considered in this Final Supplemental EIS. 2.2.2.1 No Action Alternative The No Action Alternative includes a Status Quo Baseline and several potential scenarios that could result if the Presidential Permit is denied or the proposed Project is not otherwise implemented. Identification and analysis of these scenarios are informed by the Market Analysis in Section 1.4. The Status Quo Baseline is included for the purposes of comparing the impacts of the proposed Project to existing conditions. Under the Status Quo Baseline, the proposed Project would not be built. Environmental conditions under the baseline would therefore be the same as those described in the respective resource sections in Chapter 3, Affected Environment.
    [Show full text]