Rules Ventral Prefrontal Cortical Axons Use to Reach Their Targets
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Human Thalamus Is an Integrative Hub for Functional Brain Networks
5594 • The Journal of Neuroscience, June 7, 2017 • 37(23):5594–5607 Behavioral/Cognitive The Human Thalamus Is an Integrative Hub for Functional Brain Networks X Kai Hwang, Maxwell A. Bertolero, XWilliam B. Liu, and XMark D’Esposito Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720 The thalamus is globally connected with distributed cortical regions, yet the functional significance of this extensive thalamocortical connectivityremainslargelyunknown.Byperforminggraph-theoreticanalysesonthalamocorticalfunctionalconnectivitydatacollected from human participants, we found that most thalamic subdivisions display network properties that are capable of integrating multi- modal information across diverse cortical functional networks. From a meta-analysis of a large dataset of functional brain-imaging experiments, we further found that the thalamus is involved in multiple cognitive functions. Finally, we found that focal thalamic lesions in humans have widespread distal effects, disrupting the modular organization of cortical functional networks. This converging evidence suggests that the human thalamus is a critical hub region that could integrate diverse information being processed throughout the cerebral cortex as well as maintain the modular structure of cortical functional networks. Key words: brain networks; diaschisis; functional connectivity; graph theory; thalamus Significance Statement The thalamus is traditionally viewed as a passive relay station of information from sensory organs or subcortical structures to the cortex. However, the thalamus has extensive connections with the entire cerebral cortex, which can also serve to integrate infor- mation processing between cortical regions. In this study, we demonstrate that multiple thalamic subdivisions display network properties that are capable of integrating information across multiple functional brain networks. Moreover, the thalamus is engaged by tasks requiring multiple cognitive functions. -
Brainstem: Midbrainmidbrain
Brainstem:Brainstem: MidbrainMidbrain 1.1. MidbrainMidbrain –– grossgross externalexternal anatomyanatomy 2.2. InternalInternal structurestructure ofof thethe midbrain:midbrain: cerebral peduncles tegmentum tectum (guadrigeminal plate) Midbrain MidbrainMidbrain –– generalgeneral featuresfeatures location – between forebrain and hindbrain the smallest region of the brainstem – 6-7g the shortest brainstem segment ~ 2 cm long least differentiated brainstem division human midbrain is archipallian – shared general architecture with the most ancient of vertebrates embryonic origin – mesencephalon main functions:functions a sort of relay station for sound and visual information serves as a nerve pathway of the cerebral hemispheres controls the eye movement involved in control of body movement Prof. Dr. Nikolai Lazarov 2 Midbrain MidbrainMidbrain –– grossgross anatomyanatomy dorsal part – tectum (quadrigeminal plate): superior colliculi inferior colliculi cerebral aqueduct ventral part – cerebral peduncles:peduncles dorsal – tegmentum (central part) ventral – cerebral crus substantia nigra Prof. Dr. Nikolai Lazarov 3 Midbrain CerebralCerebral cruscrus –– internalinternal structurestructure CerebralCerebral peduncle:peduncle: crus cerebri tegmentum mesencephali substantia nigra two thick semilunar white matter bundles composition – somatotopically arranged motor tracts: corticospinal } pyramidal tracts – medial ⅔ corticobulbar corticopontine fibers: frontopontine tracts – medially temporopontine tracts – laterally -
Higher-Order Thalamic Relays Burst More Than First-Order Relays
Higher-order thalamic relays burst more than first-order relays E. J. Ramcharan*, J. W. Gnadt†, and S. M. Sherman‡§ *Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431; †Department of Neurobiology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5230; and ‡Department of Neurobiology, Pharmacology, and Physiology, University of Chicago, MC 0926, 316 Abbott, 947 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 Edited by Robert H. Wurtz, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved July 11, 2005 (received for review April 6, 2005) There is a strong correlation between the behavior of an animal trasted with the higher-order relays, such as the pulvinar for and the firing mode (burst or tonic) of thalamic relay neurons. vision, the magnocellular (or ‘‘nonlemniscal’’) portion of the Certain differences between first- and higher-order thalamic relays medial geniculate nucleus for hearing, and the posterior medial (which relay peripheral information to the cortex versus informa- nucleus for somesthesis, which are thought to serve as a link in tion from one cortical area to another, respectively) suggest that cortico-thalamo-cortical pathways that continue to process these more bursting might occur in the higher-order relays. Accordingly, information streams. we recorded bursting behavior in single cells from awake, behav- We thought that it would be useful to extend the observations ing rhesus monkeys in first-order (the lateral geniculate nucleus, of bursting to higher-order thalamic relays in the behaving the ventral posterior nucleus, and the ventral portion of the medial monkey for the following reasons. -
MRI Atlas of the Human Deep Brain Jean-Jacques Lemaire
MRI Atlas of the Human Deep Brain Jean-Jacques Lemaire To cite this version: Jean-Jacques Lemaire. MRI Atlas of the Human Deep Brain. 2019. hal-02116633 HAL Id: hal-02116633 https://hal.uca.fr/hal-02116633 Preprint submitted on 1 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License MRI ATLAS of the HUMAN DEEP BRAIN Jean-Jacques Lemaire, MD, PhD, neurosurgeon, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA, France This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Terminologia Foundational Model Terminologia MRI Deep Brain Atlas NeuroNames (ID) neuroanatomica usages, classical and french terminologies of Anatomy (ID) Anatomica 1998 (ID) 2017 http://fipat.library.dal.ca In -
Lecture 12 Notes
Somatic regions Limbic regions These functionally distinct regions continue rostrally into the ‘tweenbrain. Fig 11-4 Courtesy of MIT Press. Used with permission. Schneider, G. E. Brain structure and its Origins: In the Development and in Evolution of Behavior and the Mind. MIT Press, 2014. ISBN: 9780262026734. 1 Chapter 11, questions about the somatic regions: 4) There are motor neurons located in the midbrain. What movements do those motor neurons control? (These direct outputs of the midbrain are not a subject of much discussion in the chapter.) 5) At the base of the midbrain (ventral side) one finds a fiber bundle that shows great differences in relative size in different species. Give examples. What are the fibers called and where do they originate? 8) A decussating group of axons called the brachium conjunctivum also varies greatly in size in different species. It is largest in species with the largest neocortex but does not come from the neocortex. From which structure does it come? Where does it terminate? (Try to guess before you look it up.) 2 Motor neurons of the midbrain that control somatic muscles: the oculomotor nuclei of cranial nerves III and IV. At this level, the oculomotor nucleus of nerve III is present. Fibers from retina to Superior Colliculus Brachium of Inferior Colliculus (auditory pathway to thalamus, also to SC) Oculomotor nucleus Spinothalamic tract (somatosensory; some fibers terminate in SC) Medial lemniscus Cerebral peduncle: contains Red corticospinal + corticopontine fibers, + cortex to hindbrain fibers nucleus (n. ruber) Tectospinal tract Rubrospinal tract Courtesy of MIT Press. Used with permission. Schneider, G. -
Learning & Memory
Downloaded from learnmem.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Review Unraveling the contributions of the diencephalon to recognition memory: A review John P. Aggleton,1,3 Julie R. Dumont,1 and Elizabeth Clea Warburton2 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, United Kingdom; 2MRC Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, School of Physiology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom Both clinical investigations and studies with animals reveal nuclei within the diencephalon that are vital for recognition memory (the judgment of prior occurrence). This review seeks to identify these nuclei and to consider why they might be important for recognition memory. Despite the lack of clinical cases with circumscribed pathology within the diencepha- lon and apparent species differences, convergent evidence from a variety of sources implicates a subgroup of medial dien- cephalic nuclei. It is supposed that the key functional interactions of this subgroup of diencephalic nuclei are with the medial temporal lobe, the prefrontal cortex, and with cingulate regions. In addition, some of the clinical evidence most readily supports dual-process models of recognition, which assume two independent cognitive processes (recollective-based and familiarity-based) that combine to direct recognition judgments. From this array of information a “multi-effect multi- nuclei” model is proposed, in which the mammillary bodies and the anterior thalamic nuclei are of preeminent importance for recollective-based recognition. The medial dorsal thalamic nucleus is thought to contribute to familiarity-based recog- nition, but this nucleus, along with various midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei, is also assumed to have broader, indirect effects upon both recollective-based and familiarity-based recognition. -
Projections of Auditory Cortex to the Medial Geniculate Body of the Cat
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 430:27–55 (2001) Projections of Auditory Cortex to the Medial Geniculate Body of the Cat JEFFERY A. WINER,* JAMES J. DIEHL, AND DAVID T. LARUE Division of Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3200 ABSTRACT The corticofugal projection from 12 auditory cortical fields onto the medial geniculate body was investigated in adult cats by using wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horserad- ish peroxidase or biotinylated dextran amines. The chief goals were to determine the degree of divergence from single cortical fields, the pattern of convergence from several fields onto a single nucleus, the extent of reciprocal relations between corticothalamic and thalamocortical connections, and to contrast and compare the patterns of auditory corticogeniculate projec- tions with corticofugal input to the inferior colliculus. The main findings were that (1) single areas showed a wide range of divergence, projecting to as few as 5, and to as many as 15, thalamic nuclei; (2) most nuclei received projections from approximately five cortical areas, whereas others were the target of as few as three areas; (3) there was global corticothalamic- thalamocortical reciprocity in every experiment, and there were also significant instances of nonreciprocal projections, with the corticothalamic input often more extensive; (4) the corti- cothalamic projection was far stronger and more divergent than the corticocollicular projec- tion from the same areas, suggesting that the thalamus and the inferior colliculus receive differential degrees of corticofugal control; (5) cochleotopically organized areas had fewer corticothalamic projections than fields in which tonotopy was not a primary feature; and (6) all corticothalamic projections were topographic, focal, and clustered, indicating that areas with limited cochleotopic organization still have some internal spatial arrangement. -
Amygdalar Interaction with the Mediodorsal Nucleus of the Thalamus and the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Stimulus-Reward Associative Learning in the Monkey
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1990, fO(11): 3479-3493 Amygdalar Interaction with the Mediodorsal Nucleus of the Thalamus and the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Stimulus-Reward Associative Learning in the Monkey David Gaffan’ and Elisabeth A. Murray* ‘Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3UD, England, and *Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 Cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were assessed One kind of associative learning in which the amygdala is of for their ability to associate visual stimuli with food reward. central importance is the associationof a sensorystimulus with They learned a series of new 2-choice visual discriminations the incentive value of food reward. In visual-discrimination between colored patterns displayed on a monitor screen. learning for food reward, the role of the amygdala varies ac- The feedback for correct choice was the delivery of food. In cording to the associative structure of the task. If visual dis- order to promote associative learning between the visual criminative stimuli are associateddirectly with the incentive stimuli and the incentive value of the food reward, reward value of the food reward, efficient learning dependson an in- delivery was not accompanied by any distinctive visual feed- trahemispheric interaction between the amygdala and the vi- back on the display screen. The rate of learning new prob- sual-associationcortex ipsilateral to it (E. A. Gaffan et al., 1988). lems was assessed before and after surgery in a total of 16 But when visual discriminative stimuli are associatedwith the monkeys. Three groups of 3 monkeys received bilaterally incentive value indirectly, via the mediation of a direct asso- symmetrical ablations in either the amygdala, the medio- ciation with an auditory or visual secondary reinforcer, visual dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, or the ventromedial pre- interaction with the amygdala is less important (Gaffan and frontal cortex. -
Fmri Assessment of the Pulvinar and Medial Dorsal Nucleus in Normal Volunteers Monte S
Neuroscience Letters 404 (2006) 282–287 Thalamocortical circuits: fMRI assessment of the pulvinar and medial dorsal nucleus in normal volunteers Monte S. Buchsbaum a,∗, Bradley R. Buchsbaum b, Sylvie Chokron c,d, Cheuk Tang a,e, Tse-Chung Wei a, William Byne a,f a Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Box 1505, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA b Unit on Integrative Neuroimaging, Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA c Laboratoire de Psychologie Experimentale, CNRS, UMR 5105, Grenoble, France d Service de Neurologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique Rothschild, Paris, France e Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA f Bronx VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA Received 27 September 2005; received in revised form 10 March 2006; accepted 15 May 2006 Abstract This fMRI study investigates the activation of the thalamic nuclei in a spatial focusing-of-attention task previously shown to activate the pulvinar with FDG-PET and assesses the connectivity of the thalamic nuclei with cortical areas. Normal right-handed subjects (eight men, eight women, average age = 32 years) viewed four types of stimuli positioned to the right or left of the central fixation point (left hemifield-large letter, left hemifield-small letter display with flanking letters; right hemifield-large letter, right hemifield-small letter display with flankers). BOLD responses to small letters surrounded by flankers were compared with responses to large isolated letters. To examine maximum functional regional connectivity, we modeled “subject” as a random effect and attained fixed effect parameter estimates and t-statistics for functional connectivity between each of the thalamic nuclei (pulvinar, medial dorsal, and anterior) as the seed region and each non-seed voxel. -
Medial Geniculate Lesions Block Amygdalar and Cingulothalamic Learning-Related Neuronal Activity
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1, 1997, 17(21):8645–8655 Medial Geniculate Lesions Block Amygdalar and Cingulothalamic Learning-Related Neuronal Activity Amy Poremba1 and Michael Gabriel2 1Department of Psychology and Institute for Neuroscience, Univsity of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, and 2Department of Psychology and Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 This study assessed the role of the thalamic medial geniculate anterior-ventral and medial-dorsal thalamic nuclei, and the ba- (MG) nucleus in discriminative avoidance learning, wherein rab- solateral nucleus of the amygdala before training. Learning was bits acquire a locomotory response to a tone [conditioned severely impaired and TIA was abolished in all areas in rabbits stimulus (CS)1] to avoid a foot shock, and they learn to ignore with lesions. Thus learning and TIA require the integrity of the a different tone (CS2) not predictive of foot shock. Limbic MG nucleus. Only damage in the medial MG division was (anterior and medial dorsal) thalamic, cingulate cortical, or significantly correlated with the learning deficit. The lesions amygdalar lesions severely impair acquisition, and neurons in abolished the sensory response of amygdalar neurons, and these areas develop training-induced activity (TIA): more firing they attenuated (but did not eliminate) the sensory response of to the CS1 than to the CS2. MG neurons exhibit TIA during cingulothalamic neurons, suggesting the existence of extra learning and project to the amygdala. The MG neurons may geniculate -
Download English-US Transcript (PDF)
MITOCW | MIT9_14S14_lec29.mp3 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high-quality educational resources for free. To make a donation or view additional materials from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare at ocw.mit.edu. PROFESSOR: OK, instead of a quiz I'm trying to write some homework. And some of them will be extra credit, some of them will be part of the required homework. Now today we still have a lot to do on chapter 26 concerning core pathways of the limbic system. And this is where we finished last time. We may not even get to the part on hormones and brain development and effects on the brain, but we may just do most of that with the reading because I really need the time to talk to you about the recent changes in understanding of the hippocampus and the pathways related to it. OK, we answered this question with the information about the internal environment in the body reaches the hypothalamus via both the bloodstream and sensory pathways. And then I asked this about, well, how do these molecules even get in the brain? We know that there's a blood-brain barrier. Very small molecules can get in, but not the larger, organic molecules. And yet, things like angiotensin II do get in, but they get in only at certain places. Places where the blood-brain barrier is weak. I think the figure in the book is a little better than this one, but this is a similar one. -
Functional Neuroanatomy for Posture and Gait Control
REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.16062 / J Mov Disord 2017;10(1):1-17 pISSN 2005-940X / eISSN 2093-4939 Functional ABSTRACT Here we argue functional neuroanatomy for pos- ture-gait control. Multi-sensory information such as Neuroanatomy somatosensory, visual and vestibular sensation act on various areas of the brain so that adaptable pos- ture-gait control can be achieved. Automatic process for Posture and of gait, which is steady-state stepping movements associating with postural reflexes including head- eye coordination accompanied by appropriate align- Gait Control ment of body segments and optimal level of pos- tural muscle tone, is mediated by the descending pathways from the brainstem to the spinal cord. Par- ticularly, reticulospinal pathways arising from the lat- Kaoru Takakusaki eral part of the mesopontine tegmentum and spinal locomotor network contribute to this process. On The Research Center for Brain Function and Medical Engineering, the other hand, walking in unfamiliar circumstance Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan requires cognitive process of postural control, which depends on knowledges of self-body, such as body schema and body motion in space. The cognitive in- formation is produced at the temporoparietal asso- ciation cortex, and is fundamental to sustention of vertical posture and construction of motor programs. The programs in the motor cortical areas run to ex- ecute anticipatory postural adjustment that is opti- mal for achievement of goal-directed movements. The basal ganglia and cerebellum may affect both the automatic and cognitive processes of posture- gait control through reciprocal connections with the brainstem and cerebral cortex, respectively. Conse- quently, impairments in cognitive function by dam- ages in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia and cere- bellum may disturb posture-gait control, resulting in falling.