Functional Neuroanatomy for Posture and Gait Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functional Neuroanatomy for Posture and Gait Control REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.16062 / J Mov Disord 2017;10(1):1-17 pISSN 2005-940X / eISSN 2093-4939 Functional ABSTRACT Here we argue functional neuroanatomy for pos- ture-gait control. Multi-sensory information such as Neuroanatomy somatosensory, visual and vestibular sensation act on various areas of the brain so that adaptable pos- ture-gait control can be achieved. Automatic process for Posture and of gait, which is steady-state stepping movements associating with postural reflexes including head- eye coordination accompanied by appropriate align- Gait Control ment of body segments and optimal level of pos- tural muscle tone, is mediated by the descending pathways from the brainstem to the spinal cord. Par- ticularly, reticulospinal pathways arising from the lat- Kaoru Takakusaki eral part of the mesopontine tegmentum and spinal locomotor network contribute to this process. On The Research Center for Brain Function and Medical Engineering, the other hand, walking in unfamiliar circumstance Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan requires cognitive process of postural control, which depends on knowledges of self-body, such as body schema and body motion in space. The cognitive in- formation is produced at the temporoparietal asso- ciation cortex, and is fundamental to sustention of vertical posture and construction of motor programs. The programs in the motor cortical areas run to ex- ecute anticipatory postural adjustment that is opti- mal for achievement of goal-directed movements. The basal ganglia and cerebellum may affect both the automatic and cognitive processes of posture- gait control through reciprocal connections with the brainstem and cerebral cortex, respectively. Conse- quently, impairments in cognitive function by dam- ages in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia and cere- bellum may disturb posture-gait control, resulting in falling. Key Words Multisensory information; midbrain locomotor region; reticulospinal system; body schema; motor programs; Parkinson’s disease. Received: December 13, 2016 Accepted: December 15, 2016 Corresponding author: Kaoru Takakusaki, MD, PhD, The Research Center for Brain Function and Medical Engineering, Asahikawa Medical University, 2-1, 1-1 Midorigaoka- Higashi, Asahikawa 078-8511, Japan Tel: +81-166-68-2884 Fax: +81-166-68-2887 E-mail: [email protected] cc This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attri- bution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which per- mits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright © 2017 The Korean Movement Disorder Society 1 JMD J Mov Disord 2017;10(1):1-17 GENERAL SCHEMA OF emotional, goal-directed behaviors are always ac- POSTURE-GAIT CONTROL companied by automatic process of postural control including balance adjustment and muscle tone regu- Figure 1 illustrates our recent understanding of lation. The subject is largely unaware of this process basic signal flows involved in motor control. Senso- which is evoked by sequential activations of neurons ry signals arising from external stimuli and/or inter- in the brainstem and spinal cord. Basic locomotor nal visceral information have various functions. For motor pattern is generated by spinal locomotor net- example, they are to be utilized for cognitive process- works that is termed as the central pattern generators ing such as production of working memory which (CPG). However, in order to learn motor skills or guides future behavior. Alternatively, they may affect behave in unfamiliar circumstance, the subject re- emotional and arousal states. Sensory signals are fur- quires cognitive posture-gait control that depends on ther available to detect and correct postural instabili- cognition of self-body information together with ty by acting on the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and spatial localization of objects in extra-personal space. brainstem. Accordingly, animal initiates movements The cerebellum regulates the cognitive and auto- depending on either a “cognitive reference” or an matic processes of posture-gait control by acting on “emotional reference”.1,2 the cerebral cortex via the thalamocortical projection Voluntary movements are derived from intention- and on the brainstem, respectively. Both the feed- ally-elicited motor commands arising from the cere- forward information from the cerebral cortex via the bral cortex to the brainstem and spinal cord. On the cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway and real-time sen- other hand, emotional reference may contribute to sory feedback via the spinocerebellar tract to the cer- emotional motor behavior which is generated by the ebellum may play major roles in these operations. projections from the limbic-hypothalamus to the The basal ganglia may also contribute to the modu- brainstem, such as fight or flight reactions.1,3,4 Re- lation of each process though its gamma-aminobu- gardless of whether the initiation is volitional or tyric acid (GABA)-ergic projections to the cerebral cortex and brainstem.2,5,6 The degree of GABAergic influence from the basal ganglia is regulated by the midbrain dopaminergic neurons.7 BRAINSTEM AND SPINAL CORD; CORE-STRUCTURES OF POSTURE-GAIT CONTROL In the absence of their forebrain, like a decere- brate cat, it can walk, trot and gallop. When the de- cerebration is made at precollicular-postmammilla- ry level, the cat initiates locomotion by electrical or chemical stimulation applied to the mesencephalic or midbrain locomotor region (MLR).1,8,9 However, if the neuraxis is transected slightly higher at the precollicular-premammillary level, cats can sponta- Figure 1. Basic signal flow involved in postural control. Multisensory signals neously elicit locomotion with well-coordinated pos- from the visual, vestibular, auditory, somatosensory (proprioceptive), and viscer- tural control.10 Therefore, a critical region exists be- al receptors act on various sites in the central nervous system. These signals tween these decerebrate levels. This area is recognized may provide cognitive and emotional references to the cerebral cortex and limbic system, respectively, so that the subject may elicit either voluntary movements or as the subthalamic locomotor region (SLR), which emotional motor behavior depending on the context. In each case, automatic mostly corresponds to the lateral hypothalamic area. process of postural control, such regulation of postural muscle tone and basic postural reflexes, by the brainstem and spinal cord is required. On the other hand, Stimulation of the SLR evoked locomotion after a cognitive postural control is particularly important when the subject learns motor large lesion was made in the MLR area,11 indicating skills and behaves in unfamiliar circumstance. See text for detail explanation. Modified from Takakusaki. Mov Disord 2013;28:1483-1491, with permission of that the SLR has direct connections with the brain- Wiley.6 stem locomotor pathway beyond the MLR. Howev- 2 Posture-Gait Control Takakusaki K er, the walking in the decerebrate preparations is rats by Sherman et al.21 show non-cholinergic neu- machine-like and is neither goal-directed nor adap- rons just medial to the PPN have projections to the tive to the environment. Hence, the SLR connec- spinal cord, while the cholinergic neurons of the PPN tions to the MLR are likely important for normal do not. This area at the mesopontine junction may be control of posture and gait. the true MLR. The dorsal neurons of this MLR area So far three locomotor regions have been identi- (laterodorsal tegmental nucleus) with spinal projec- fied in animals: the MLR in the mesopontine teg- tions are active in locomotion, while the ventral neu- mentum, the SLR and the cerebellar locomotor region rons are active in standing and do not have spinal pro- (CLR) in the mid-part of the cerebellum.12 Human jections. imaging study demonstrated that the organization of these supraspinal locomotor centers was preserved Functional organization of the reticular during the transition to bipedal locomotion human.13 formation in the control of posture The clinical relevance of these centers has so far been It is generally agreed that the reticulospinal tract largely neglected. (RST) contributes to regulation of the level of mus- cle tone. There may exist functional organization in Role of the mesencephalic area in the control the pontomedullary reticular formation (PMRF) in of posture and locomotion relation to the control of postural muscle tone (Fig- The MLR appears to be present in all classes of ure 3).15 Direct recording of reticulospinal neurons vertebrates.14 It likely includes the cuneiform nucle- (RSNs) revealed that those located in the dorso-me- us (CNF) and the pedunculopontine tegmental nu- dial part of the PMRF are active during the period cleus (PPN), although the precise location of the lo- of muscle tone suppression or muscular atonia (Fig- comotor regulation still remains a matter of debate. ure 3Aa), and those in the ventromedial part are ac- The PPN is located in the ventrolateral part of the tive during reflex standing due to decerebrate rigidity caudal mesencephalic reticular formation, composed or hypertonus (Figure 3Ab). Accordingly, functional of a heterogeneous population of neurons, containing topographical organization may exist in the PMRF GABA and glutamate in addition to acetylcholine.15 in the control of postural muscle tone. On the other Different neuronal
Recommended publications
  • Optogenetic Fmri Interrogation of Brain-Wide Central Vestibular Pathways
    Optogenetic fMRI interrogation of brain-wide central vestibular pathways Alex T. L. Leonga,b, Yong Guc, Ying-Shing Chand, Hairong Zhenge, Celia M. Donga,b, Russell W. Chana,b, Xunda Wanga,b, Yilong Liua,b, Li Hai Tanf, and Ed X. Wua,b,d,g,1 aLaboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China; bDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China; cInstitute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China; dSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China; eShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China; fCenter for Language and Brain, Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen 518057, China; and gState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China Edited by Marcus E. Raichle, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved March 20, 2019 (received for review July 20, 2018) Blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI (fMRI) constitutes a multisensory integration process in the vestibular system is op- powerful neuroimaging technology to map brain-wide functions tokinetic nystagmus, whereby visual cues are used to induce in response to specific sensory or cognitive tasks. However, fMRI compensatory reflexive eye movements to maintain a stable gaze mapping of the vestibular system, which is pivotal for our sense of while moving (11, 12). These eye movements involve inputs from balance, poses significant challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainstem: Midbrainmidbrain
    Brainstem:Brainstem: MidbrainMidbrain 1.1. MidbrainMidbrain –– grossgross externalexternal anatomyanatomy 2.2. InternalInternal structurestructure ofof thethe midbrain:midbrain: cerebral peduncles tegmentum tectum (guadrigeminal plate) Midbrain MidbrainMidbrain –– generalgeneral featuresfeatures location – between forebrain and hindbrain the smallest region of the brainstem – 6-7g the shortest brainstem segment ~ 2 cm long least differentiated brainstem division human midbrain is archipallian – shared general architecture with the most ancient of vertebrates embryonic origin – mesencephalon main functions:functions a sort of relay station for sound and visual information serves as a nerve pathway of the cerebral hemispheres controls the eye movement involved in control of body movement Prof. Dr. Nikolai Lazarov 2 Midbrain MidbrainMidbrain –– grossgross anatomyanatomy dorsal part – tectum (quadrigeminal plate): superior colliculi inferior colliculi cerebral aqueduct ventral part – cerebral peduncles:peduncles dorsal – tegmentum (central part) ventral – cerebral crus substantia nigra Prof. Dr. Nikolai Lazarov 3 Midbrain CerebralCerebral cruscrus –– internalinternal structurestructure CerebralCerebral peduncle:peduncle: crus cerebri tegmentum mesencephali substantia nigra two thick semilunar white matter bundles composition – somatotopically arranged motor tracts: corticospinal } pyramidal tracts – medial ⅔ corticobulbar corticopontine fibers: frontopontine tracts – medially temporopontine tracts – laterally
    [Show full text]
  • Title the Human Vestibular Cortex
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.22.21260061; this version posted July 24, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license . Title The human vestibular cortex: functional anatomy, connectivity and the effect of vestibular disease Abbreviated title Human vestibular cortex functional anatomy Author names and affiliations Richard T. Ibitoye1,2, Emma-Jane Mallas1,3, Niall J. Bourke1, Diego Kaski4, Adolfo M. Bronstein2, David J. Sharp1,3,5 1. Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. 2. Neuro-otology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. 3. UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research & Technology Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK 4. Department of Clinical and Motor Neurosciences, Centre for Vestibular and Behavioural Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK 5. Centre for Injury Studies, Imperial College London, London, UK Corresponding authors [email protected]; [email protected] Page/Word Counts Number of pages = 36 Number of figures = 7 Tables = 1 Number of words for Abstract = 249 Number of words for Introduction = 575 Number of words for Discussion = 1373 Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no competing financial interests. Acknowledgements This work was supported by funding from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/J004685/1), the Dunhill Medical Trust (R481/0516) and the Imperial National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory and Vestibular Systems Objective • to Learn the Functional
    Auditory and Vestibular Systems Objective • To learn the functional organization of the auditory and vestibular systems • To understand how one can use changes in auditory function following injury to localize the site of a lesion • To begin to learn the vestibular pathways, as a prelude to studying motor pathways controlling balance in a later lab. Ch 7 Key Figs: 7-1; 7-2; 7-4; 7-5 Clinical Case #2 Hearing loss and dizziness; CC4-1 Self evaluation • Be able to identify all structures listed in key terms and describe briefly their principal functions • Use neuroanatomy on the web to test your understanding ************************************************************************************** List of media F-5 Vestibular efferent connections The first order neurons of the vestibular system are bipolar cells whose cell bodies are located in the vestibular ganglion in the internal ear (NTA Fig. 7-3). The distal processes of these cells contact the receptor hair cells located within the ampulae of the semicircular canals and the utricle and saccule. The central processes of the bipolar cells constitute the vestibular portion of the vestibulocochlear (VIIIth cranial) nerve. Most of these primary vestibular afferents enter the ipsilateral brain stem inferior to the inferior cerebellar peduncle to terminate in the vestibular nuclear complex, which is located in the medulla and caudal pons. The vestibular nuclear complex (NTA Figs, 7-2, 7-3), which lies in the floor of the fourth ventricle, contains four nuclei: 1) the superior vestibular nucleus; 2) the inferior vestibular nucleus; 3) the lateral vestibular nucleus; and 4) the medial vestibular nucleus. Vestibular nuclei give rise to secondary fibers that project to the cerebellum, certain motor cranial nerve nuclei, the reticular formation, all spinal levels, and the thalamus.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12 Notes
    Somatic regions Limbic regions These functionally distinct regions continue rostrally into the ‘tweenbrain. Fig 11-4 Courtesy of MIT Press. Used with permission. Schneider, G. E. Brain structure and its Origins: In the Development and in Evolution of Behavior and the Mind. MIT Press, 2014. ISBN: 9780262026734. 1 Chapter 11, questions about the somatic regions: 4) There are motor neurons located in the midbrain. What movements do those motor neurons control? (These direct outputs of the midbrain are not a subject of much discussion in the chapter.) 5) At the base of the midbrain (ventral side) one finds a fiber bundle that shows great differences in relative size in different species. Give examples. What are the fibers called and where do they originate? 8) A decussating group of axons called the brachium conjunctivum also varies greatly in size in different species. It is largest in species with the largest neocortex but does not come from the neocortex. From which structure does it come? Where does it terminate? (Try to guess before you look it up.) 2 Motor neurons of the midbrain that control somatic muscles: the oculomotor nuclei of cranial nerves III and IV. At this level, the oculomotor nucleus of nerve III is present. Fibers from retina to Superior Colliculus Brachium of Inferior Colliculus (auditory pathway to thalamus, also to SC) Oculomotor nucleus Spinothalamic tract (somatosensory; some fibers terminate in SC) Medial lemniscus Cerebral peduncle: contains Red corticospinal + corticopontine fibers, + cortex to hindbrain fibers nucleus (n. ruber) Tectospinal tract Rubrospinal tract Courtesy of MIT Press. Used with permission. Schneider, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Nerve VIII
    Cranial Nerve VIII Color Code Important (The Vestibulo-Cochlear Nerve) Doctors Notes Notes/Extra explanation Please view our Editing File before studying this lecture to check for any changes. Objectives At the end of the lecture, the students should be able to: ✓ List the nuclei related to vestibular and cochlear nerves in the brain stem. ✓ Describe the type and site of each nucleus. ✓ Describe the vestibular pathways and its main connections. ✓ Describe the auditory pathway and its main connections. Due to the difference of arrangement of the lecture between the girls and boys slides we will stick to the girls slides then summarize the pathway according to the boys slides. Ponto-medullary Sulcus (cerebello- pontine angle) Recall: both cranial nerves 8 and 7 emerge from the ventral surface of the brainstem at the ponto- medullary sulcus (cerebello-pontine angle) Brain – Ventral Surface Vestibulo-Cochlear (VIII) 8th Cranial Nerve o Type: Special sensory (SSA) o Conveys impulses from inner ear to nervous system. o Components: • Vestibular part: conveys impulses associated with body posture ,balance and coordination of head & eye movements. • Cochlear part: conveys impulses associated with hearing. o Vestibular & cochlear parts leave the ventral surface* of brain stem through the pontomedullary sulcus ‘at cerebellopontine angle*’ (lateral to facial nerve), run laterally in posterior cranial fossa and enter the internal acoustic meatus along with 7th (facial) nerve. *see the previous slide Auditory Pathway Only on the girls’ slides 04:14 Characteristics: o It is a multisynaptic pathway o There are several locations between medulla and the thalamus where axons may synapse and not all the fibers behave in the same manner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vestibulo-Cochlear Nerve (Cranial Nerve 8) (Vestibular & Auditory Pathways)
    The Vestibulo-cochlear Nerve (Cranial Nerve 8) (Vestibular & Auditory Pathways) By : Prof. Ahmed Fathalla & Dr. Sanaa AlShaarawy OBJECTIVES At the end of the lecture, the students should be able to: qList the nuclei related to vestibular and cochlear nerves in the brain stem. qDescribe the type and site of each nucleus. qDescribe the vestibular pathways and its main connections. qDescribe the auditory pathway and its main connections. BRAIN – VENTRAL SURFACE Ponto-medullary Sulcus (cerebello- pontine angle) Vestibulo-Cochlear Nerve • Type: Special sensory (SSA) • Conveys impulses from inner ear to nervous system. • Components: § Vestibular part: conveys impulses associated with body posture ,balance and coordination of head & eye movements. § Cochlear part: conveys impulses associated with hearing. • Vestibular & cochlear parts leave the ventral surface of brain stem through the pontomedullary sulcus ‘at crebellopontine angle’ (lateral to facial nerve), run laterally in posterior cranial fossa and enter the internal acoustic meatus along with 7th nerve. Vestibular Nerve • The cell bodies (1st order neurons) are Vestibular nuclei belong to located in the vestibular ganglion special somatic afferent within the internal auditory meatus. column in brain stem. • The Peripheral processes (vestibular nerve fibers) make dendritic contact with hair cells of the membranous labyrinth (inner ear). 2 • The central processes (form the vestibular nerve) ‘’Efferent Fibres’’ : 1. Mostly end up in the lateral, medial, inferior and superior 1 vestibular nuclei (2nd order neurons) of the rostral medulla, located beneath the lateral part of the floor of 4th ventricle 2. Some fibers go to the cerebellum through the inferior cerebellar peduncle • Other Efferents from the vestibular nuclei project to other regions for the maintenance of balance, conscious awareness of vestibular stimulation , co-ordination of head & eye movements and control the posture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dizzy Patient: Don't Forget Disorders of the Central Vestibular
    REVIEWS The dizzy patient: don’t forget disorders of the central vestibular system Thomas Brandt1 and Marianne Dieterich1–3 Abstract | Vertigo and dizziness are among the most common complaints in neurology clinics, and they account for about 13% of the patients entering emergency units. In this Review, we focus on central vestibular disorders, which are mostly attributable to acute unilateral lesions of the bilateral vestibular circuitry in the brain. In a tertiary interdisciplinary outpatient dizziness unit, central vestibular disorders, including vestibular migraine, comprise about 25% of the established diagnoses. The signs and symptoms of these disorders can mimic those of peripheral vestibular disorders with sustained rotational vertigo. Bedside examinations, such as the head impulse test and ocular motor testing to determine spontaneous and gaze-evoked nystagmus or skew deviation, reliably differentiate central from peripheral syndromes. We also consider disorders of ‘higher vestibular functions’, which involve more than one sensory modality as well as cognitive domains (for example, orientation, spatial memory and navigation). These disorders include hemispatial neglect, the room tilt illusion, pusher syndrome, and impairment of spatial memory and navigation associated with hippocampal atrophy in cases of peripheral bilateral vestibular loss. Vertigo and dizziness are common complaints in disorders elicited by dysfunction within the temporo­ neuro logical patients. In a general academic emergency parietal cortex, thalamus, brainstem and cerebellum department, these symptoms were evident in 1–10% of can be classified by characteristic perceptual and ocular the overall attendances1,2, and they account for about motor manifestations, as well as sensorimotor control 13% of neurological consultations3,4. Up to 25% of of posture and gait.
    [Show full text]
  • Compensatory Sprouting and Impulse Rerouting After Unilateral Pyramidal Tract Lesion in Neonatal Rats
    The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1, 2000, 20(17):6561–6569 Compensatory Sprouting and Impulse Rerouting after Unilateral Pyramidal Tract Lesion in Neonatal Rats Werner J. Z’Graggen, Karim Fouad, Olivier Raineteau, Gerlinde A. S. Metz, Martin E. Schwab, and Gwendolyn L. Kartje Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland After lesions of the developing mammalian CNS, structural plas- tigate possible new functional connections from the motor cortex ticity and functional recovery are much more pronounced than in of the pyramidotomy side to the periphery. In rats lesioned as the mature CNS. We investigated the anatomical reorganization adults, stimulation of the motor cortex ipsilateral to the pyra- of the corticofugal projections rostral to a unilateral lesion of the midotomy never elicited EMG activity. In contrast, in P2 lesioned corticospinal tract at the level of the medullary pyramid (pyra- rats bilateral forelimb EMGs were found. EMG latencies were midotomy) and the contribution of this reorganization and other comparable for the ipsilateral and contralateral responses but descending systems to functional recovery. were significantly longer than in unlesioned animals. Transient Two-day-old (P2) and adult rats underwent a unilateral pyra- inactivation of both red nuclei with the GABA receptor agonist midotomy. Three months later the corticofugal projections to the muscimol led to a complete loss of these bilateral movements. red nucleus and the pons were analyzed; a relatively large num- Movements and EMGs reappeared after wash-out of the drug. ber of corticorubral and corticopontine fibers from the lesioned These results suggest an important role of the red nucleus in the side had crossed the midline and established an additional con- tralateral innervation of the red nucleus and the pons.
    [Show full text]
  • Basal Ganglia and Cerebellum Receive Different Somatosensory Information in Rats (Barrel Field/Pontine Nuclei/Cortical Lamnation/Vibrissae) BARBARA E
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 4388-4392, June 1990 Neurobiology Basal ganglia and cerebellum receive different somatosensory information in rats (barrel field/pontine nuclei/cortical lamnation/vibrissae) BARBARA E. MERCIER*, CHARLES R. LEGGt, AND MITCHELL GLICKSTEIN Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1, United Kingdom Communicated by Irving T. Diamond, March 14, 1990 ABSTRACT There are two great subcortical circuits that sublamina Vb stain far more densely, suggesting that they are relay sensory information to motor structures in the mamma- capable ofhigher levels oftonic activity than those in Va (12). lian brain. One pathway relays via the pontine nuclei and Previous study of the efferent pathways from the rat cerebellum, and the other relays by way of the basal ganglia. somatosensory cortex (2) has suggested that the cell popu- We studied the cells oforigin ofthese two major pathways from lation projecting to the basal ganglia is centered on lamina Va, the posteromedial barrel subfield ofrats, a distinct region ofthe while the population projecting to the cerebellum is centered somatosensory cortex that contains the sensory representation on Vb. However, the methods available at the time the study of the large whiskers. We itjected tracer substances into the was done were relatively insensitive (13) and a comparison caudate putamen or the pontine nuclei and charted the location with more recent work (14) shows that only a subset of the of retrogradely filled cortical cells. In preliminary studies, we entire population of corticopontine cells was identified. Wise used double-labeling techniques to determine whether the cells and Jones (figure 6a in ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Internal Anatomy of the Central Nervous System
    10353-03_CH03.qxd 8/30/07 1:12 PM Page 82 3 Internal Anatomy of the Central Nervous System LEARNING OBJECTIVES Nuclear structures and fiber tracts related to various functional systems exist side by side at each level of the After studying this chapter, students should be able to: nervous system. Because disease processes in the brain • Identify the shapes of corticospinal fibers at different rarely strike only one anatomic structure or pathway, there neuraxial levels is a tendency for a series of related and unrelated clinical symptoms to emerge after a brain injury. A thorough knowl- • Recognize the ventricular cavity at various neuroaxial edge of the internal brain structures, including their shape, levels size, location, and proximity, makes it easier to understand • Recognize major internal anatomic structures of the their functional significance. In addition, the proximity of spinal cord and describe their functions nuclear structures and fiber tracts explains multiple symp- toms that may develop from a single lesion site. • Recognize important internal anatomic structures of the medulla and explain their functions • Recognize important internal anatomic structures of the ANATOMIC ORIENTATION pons and describe their functions LANDMARKS • Identify important internal anatomic structures of the midbrain and discuss their functions Two distinct anatomic landmarks used for visual orientation to the internal anatomy of the brain are the shapes of the • Recognize important internal anatomic structures of the descending corticospinal fibers and the ventricular cavity forebrain (diencephalon, basal ganglia, and limbic (Fig. 3-1). Both are present throughout the brain, although structures) and describe their functions their shape and size vary as one progresses caudally from the • Follow the continuation of major anatomic structures rostral forebrain (telencephalon) to the caudal brainstem.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Attention Modulates Glutamate-Glutamine Levels in Vestibular Cortex: Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
    1970 • The Journal of Neuroscience, March 3, 2021 • 41(9):1970–1981 Behavioral/Cognitive Visual Attention Modulates Glutamate-Glutamine Levels in Vestibular Cortex: Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Sebastian M. Frank,1,2,3 Lisa Forster,1 Maja Pawellek,1 Wilhelm M. Malloni,1 Sinyeob Ahn,4 Peter U. Tse,2 and Mark W. Greenlee1 1Institute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany, 2Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, 3Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, and 4Siemens Healthcare, San Francisco, California 94123 Attending to a stimulus enhances the neuronal responses to it, while responses to nonattended stimuli are not enhanced and may even be suppressed. Although the neural mechanisms of response enhancement for attended stimuli have been intensely studied, the neural mechanisms underlying attentional suppression remain largely unknown. It is uncertain whether attention acts to suppress the processing in sensory cortical areas that would otherwise process the nonattended stimulus or the sub- cortical input to these cortical areas. Moreover, the neurochemical mechanisms inducing a reduction or suppression of neuro- nal responses to nonattended stimuli are as yet unknown. Here, we investigated how attention directed toward visual processing cross-modally acts to suppress vestibular responses in the human brain. By using functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a group of female and male subjects, we find that attention to visual motion downregulates in a load-depend- ent manner the concentration of excitatory neurotransmitter (glutamate and its precursor glutamine, referred to together as Glx) within the parietoinsular vestibular cortex (PIVC), a core cortical area of the vestibular system, while leaving the concen- tration of inhibitory neurotransmitter (GABA) in PIVC unchanged.
    [Show full text]