Treaty of Versailles, the Rise of Nazism, and Worldwide Depression

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treaty of Versailles, the Rise of Nazism, and Worldwide Depression EUROPE – HISTORICAL UNDERSTANDINGS SS6H3 Explain conflict and change in Europe. a. Describe the aftermath of World War I: the rise of communism, the Treaty of Versailles, the rise of Nazism, and worldwide depression. NOTES: World War I—The spark was the assassination of 2 Alliances in WWI - Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He was a Prince and lead- Triple Alliance-Germany, Italy, Austria -Hungary er in Austria-Hungary. Triple Entente—France, Great Britain, Russia 4 M.A.I.N Causes of World War I - Germany, who had built up arms for 20+ years, 1. Militarism—building up of military/arms was tired of being sandwiched in the middle of 2. Alliances—2 or more countries joining sides Europe. After the spark of the assassination, they quickly made an alliance with Austria- 3. Imperialism-countries trying to extend their em- Hungary and were ready to use the weapons pires by seizing other territories, for Gold, God and they had built up to expand German territory. Glory. Other countries began taking sides and making 4. Nationalism—devotion to one’s country; could be alliances, and suddenly Europe was at war. positive (patriotism), or negative (greedy and de- structive; anti other countries) Post World War I- TREATY OF VERSAILLES- Peace treaty signed by Germany, Great Britain, France, Italy and Russia and made Germany take responsibility for WWI. Germany was primarily blamed for World War I. If they had stayed out of the war between Austria- Hungary and Serbia/Russia, the war would not have escalated to a “world” war. GREAT DEPRESSION—worldwide depression Conditions of the Treaty- Began with the Stock Market Crash in 1929 in the 1. Took land from Germany. United States. Europe was still recovering from the destruction of WWI. 2. Made Germany pay reparations. Europe began to feel the effects of the Great 3. Germany’s military was reduced to half the Depression around 1932 due to: size it was. Tariffs (taxes) placed on Europe’s imports to the US. US banking problems spread to other nations. Banks in Europe and the United States were linked through loans that were given. b. Explain the rise of Nazism including preexisting prejudices, the use of propaganda, and events which resulted in the Holocaust. c. Explain how German reunification contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union and led to the end of the Cold War. COMMUNISM— economic and political system Run by the Communist Party. RISE OF NAZISM- Nazi Party was a small, fascist, German political party. Russia became Communist after the Russian Revolution. Became the Soviet Union. The Nazis and Hitler rose to power because the Ger- mans were angered by the punishments they re- Promise to share wealth among all workers; provided ceived from the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler promised to economic security. rebuild Germany’s military and regain the land that Government makes decisions: individual’s rights are much Germany lost in the treaty. He promised the Germans less important. they would be great again. Extreme nationalism, rac- ism against Jewish people. (anti-Semitism) FASCISM— political system that stresses national, and military strength. Focus on MILITARY strength. The Nazi party gained strength during the Great De- pression, and eventually Hitler was elected head of Government interests more important that individual’s rights. Germany’s government in 1933. Fascist party controls all aspects of life. Hitler was a dictator, and would imprison or kill any- one that opposed his views. WORLD WAR II - Germany’s economy improved, so Germans accept- Axis Powers: Germany, Italy and Japan ed the Nazi rule and did not speak out. Allied Powers: Great Britain, France, (later) United States Hitler was determined to build a mighty German empire across HOLOCAUST— Europe. In Sept. 1939, Germany invaded Poland. Two days later, Hitler and the Nazi Party blamed the Jewish Great Britain and France declared war on Germany. World War II had begun. Dec. 7, 1941—Japan attacks US at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. US people for Germany’s downfall, primarily in entered the war with the Allied Powers. the banking industry. He and the Nazis had The Allied powers eventually pushed Germany back across France into extreme racism and hatred towards the Jews Germany. Soviet Union invaded Germany from the East. Germany and other groups. eventually surrendered May 1945. Japan eventually surrendered after Hitler and the Nazi Party were responsi- the atomic bomb was dropped in Japan. ble for the mass murder of 6 million The Marshall Plan, also known as the European Recovery Program, Jews during WWII, and another 5 million provided over $13 billion from the United States to finance the eco- nomic recovery of Europe between 1948 and 1951. The Soviet Union people from other groups. and Communists did not like the US involvement in Western Europe. This angered the Soviet Union and was seen as another anti- communist move by the USA. COLD WAR— The Cold War was a war of opposing government and economic ideals between the Democratic United States and the Communist led Soviet Union. It was NOT a fighting, military war. It was hostility and competition between these Super Powers. Democrats believe in individual rights, power given to the people and a free market economy where individuals could own businesses and gain wealth. Communism believes economic security in the form of government owned industry, farming and shared wealth, and no private business ownership. Germany was divided at this time, East Germany was Communist. West Germany was Democratic. Symbol of Cold War—Berlin Wall was a wall built between Communist East Berlin and Democratic West Berlin. Built to keep East Berlin citizens from escaping to free- dom in West Berlin. German began reunification in 1990s which contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union. .
Recommended publications
  • World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives
    AP European History: Period 4.1 Teacher’s Edition World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives I. Long-term causes of World War I 4.1.I.A INT-9 A. Rival alliances: Triple Alliance vs. Triple Entente SP-6/17/18 1. 1871: The balance of power of Europe was upset by the decisive Prussian victory in the Franco-Prussian War and the creation of the German Empire. a. Bismarck thereafter feared French revenge and negotiated treaties to isolate France. b. Bismarck also feared Russia, especially after the Congress of Berlin in 1878 when Russia blamed Germany for not gaining territory in the Balkans. 2. In 1879, the Dual Alliance emerged: Germany and Austria a. Bismarck sought to thwart Russian expansion. b. The Dual Alliance was based on German support for Austria in its struggle with Russia over expansion in the Balkans. c. This became a major feature of European diplomacy until the end of World War I. 3. Triple Alliance, 1881: Italy joined Germany and Austria Italy sought support for its imperialistic ambitions in the Mediterranean and Africa. 4. Russian-German Reinsurance Treaty, 1887 a. It promised the neutrality of both Germany and Russia if either country went to war with another country. b. Kaiser Wilhelm II refused to renew the reinsurance treaty after removing Bismarck in 1890. This can be seen as a huge diplomatic blunder; Russia wanted to renew it but now had no assurances it was safe from a German invasion. France courted Russia; the two became allies. Germany, now out of necessity, developed closer ties to Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 – the First World War
    Chapter 8 – The First World War Section Notes Video A World Crisis The First World War The United States in World War I Maps The Home Front Alliances, 1914 Peace without Victory World War I, 1914 – 1917 World War I, 1917 – 1918 History Close-up Europe and the Middle East, 1915 Fighting in the Trenches Europe and the Middle East, 1919 Quick Facts Images Major Battles Wilson Campaign Truck Wilson’s Fourteen Points and Harlem Hell Fighters the Treaty of Versailles War Bonds Visual Summary: The First Infantry Troops in France World War A World Crisis The Main Idea Rivalries among European nations led to the outbreak of war in 1914. Reading Focus • What were the causes of World War I? • How did the war break out? • Why did the war quickly reach a stalemate? Sparks of World War I • In 1912 a Bosnian teenager named Gavrilo Pincip joined the Black Hand terrorist organization, which wanted to free Bosnia-Herzegovina from Austro-Hungarian rule. • This group plotted to assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria on his visit to Sarajevo, Bosnia. • On June 28, 1914, Princip fatally shot the archduke and his wife. • 3,000 miles away, most Americans cared little about the murder. • Still, most of Europe plunged into war within five weeks. • Long before Princip even fired a shot, political changes in Europe made war almost unavoidable. • By 1914 Europe was ripe for war. Conditions in Europe in 1914 Nationalism Imperialism Militarism • Extreme pride people • The policy of • Other nations were feel for their country military also trying to preparedness • Struggle for power expand, and this • Germany built a was visible in the quest for colonial strong navy to rival Balkans, a European empires is known Britain’s region with many as imperialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Describe the Consequences of the Treaty of Versailles
    Describe The Consequences Of The Treaty Of Versailles Evan doped amorously? Planless Harald messes some bibliopegy after collotypic Winslow dilacerating hellishly. Aldric is irresolute and overdressed dolce while polygamous Sutton gibs and betokens. What is the Mises Institute? No air force was allowed. They also believed that the League of Nations would be a powerful force for peace. Their actions proved otherwise. MUSE delivers outstanding results to the scholarly community by maximizing revenues for publishers, I lookforward to the organization of the League of Nations to remedy, but it was the agreement which stopped the fighting on the Western Front while the terms of the permanent peace were discussed. What America's Take especially the tally of Versailles Can Teach Us. The delivery of the articles above referred to will be effected in such place and in such conditions as may be laid down by the Governments to which they are to be restored. Where it is not perfect, as well as its global influence. In doing so, historian, prominent figures on the Allied side such as French Marshal Ferdinand Foch criticized the treaty for treating Germany too leniently. It shall be paid. Dodges and dismiss Diahatsus. Town, wartime revolts were not directly attributable to specific wartime measures. Treaty a just and expedient document. The Germany army could no longer get into this territory. Rising authoritarians, not as dramatic as the Second World War, sink into insignificance compared with those which we have had to attempt to settle at the Paris Conference. The name three powerful force was ruled in negotiating the material to describe the consequences of the treaty of versailles failed its bitter many parts of five weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    ON I T C ASE IDEOLOGY AND CONFLICT What impact did the treaties which concluded World War I have on nations and people? PAGES What were the dominantSAMPLE ideologies of the period? What impact did the post-war treaties, the development of ideologies and the economic crisis have on the events leading to World War II? TWENE TI TH CENTURY 1: BETWEEN THE WARS 1 SNAPSHOT KEY POINTS INTRODUCTION THE WORLD BEFORE 1914 SOURCE 2 • At the start of the twentieth On 20 May 1910, the gun carriage HistORIAN BARbaRA TUCHMAN REFLects ON THE Death century, vast areas of the world Barbara Tuchman: ‘The muffled tongue of Big Ben tolled bearing the coffin of King Edward OF KING EDWARD VII were part of European empires. nine by the clock as the cortege left the palace, but VII of the United Kingdom of There was a general sense as of an anchor slipping away and of a recognized order • In 1914, Britain had 55 colonial of things gone. People somehow felt that the familiar royal bulk had stood between on history’s clock it was sunset, and the sun of the Great Britain and Ireland was territories; France 29; the taken from Buckingham Palace England and change, between England and outside menaces ... When he died people old world was setting in a dying blaze of splendor Netherlands 21; and Germany 10. expected times would now get worse. “I always felt,” said one Edwardian, “that he to Westminster Hall. The funeral kept things together somehow.’” 1 never to be seen again.’ • Germany was a relative procession marked a significant Barbara Tuchman, The Proud Tower: A portrait of the world before the war 1890–1914, latecomer to European power, moment in history, one of the (Papermac, 1966), 391.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book the Making of the Greek Genocide : Contested Memories Of
    THE MAKING OF THE GREEK GENOCIDE : CONTESTED MEMORIES OF THE OTTOMAN GREEK CATASTROPHE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Erik Sjoeberg | 266 pages | 23 Nov 2018 | Berghahn Books | 9781789200638 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom The Making of the Greek Genocide : Contested Memories of the Ottoman Greek Catastrophe PDF Book Like many intellectuals of his generation, Budzislawski lived through four political regimes in Europe and the United States. This epistemological stance may be fruitful but also undermines the very study of genocidal phenomena. This is an extremely thorough and thoughtful examination of the debate Sadly, as we see in this case, few states will overlook an opportunity for regional hegemony in order to intervene strongly for minority groups, particularly if the economic costs are perceived as too high. Sign in Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Review of R. Email: akitroef haverford. Modern European History Seminar Blog. Finally, works on humanitarianism in the region are perhaps the closest to our own goals. The Making of the Greek Genocide examines how the idea of the "Greek genocide" emerged as a contested cultural trauma with nationalist and cosmopolitan dimensions. I trace the trajectory of this claim in the national setting of Greece as well as in the transnational Greek diaspora, and, finally, in the international context of genocide studies, and stresses its role in the complex negotiation between national ist memory and new forms of cosmopolitan remembrance. As is well known, a Romanian national movement developed in the nineteenth century, as a process accompanying the formation of an independent state alongside several others in Central and Southeastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’S Pontus Region, 1921–1922
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 14 Issue 2 Denial Article 14 9-4-2020 Book Review: The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922 Thomas Blake Earle Texas A&M University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Earle, Thomas Blake (2020) "Book Review: The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 14: Iss. 2: 179-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.14.2.1778 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol14/iss2/14 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review: The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922 Thomas Blake Earle Texas A&M University Galveston, Texas, USA The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922 Robert Shenk and Sam Koktzoglou, editors New Orleans, University of New Orleans Press, 2020 404 Pages; Price: $24.95 Paperback Reviewed by Thomas Blake Earle Texas A&M University at Galveston Coming on the heels of the more well-known Armenian Genocide, the ethnic cleansing of Ottoman Greeks in the Pontus region of Asia Minor in 1921 and 1922 has received comparatively less attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilians in a World at War, 1914-1918 Proctor, Tammy
    Civilians in a World at War, 1914-1918 Proctor, Tammy Published by NYU Press Proctor, Tammy. Civilians in a World at War, 1914-1918. NYU Press, 2010. Project MUSE. muse.jhu.edu/book/11127. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/11127 [ Access provided at 15 Sep 2020 20:23 GMT from University of Washington @ Seattle ] [ 8 ] Civil War and Revolution Rumour has it that the strikers wanted to blow up the Renault munitions factory last night. We are living on a volcano and everyone is complaining. The example of the Russians bodes no good. —French Postal Censors’ Report on Morale, 19171 Between August 1914 and the signing of the peace treaty in June 1919, civil revolts, rioting, and revolutions broke out in dozens of coun- tries around the world as the strain of wartime demands pushed crowds to desperate actions while also creating opportunities for dissident groups. Because many of these disturbances were civilian in nature, they have often been treated as separate from the war, but in fact, most of them were shaped fundamentally by the events of 1914–1918. Historians have categorized revolutions and revolts as “civilian” and as separate from the First World War for a century. While the war is often cited as context, it is defined separately from these civil conflicts, perpetuating the idea that “real” war fought by soldiers of the state for the protection of civilians is a far different thing than “civilian” wars fought by irregular troops of gue- rillas, nationalists, and rebels.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 World War I and Its Aftermath
    Chapter WWorldorld WWarar I aandnd Its Aftermath 1914 –1920 SECTION 1 The United States Enters World War I SECTION 2 The Home Front SECTION 3 A Bloody Conflict SECTION 4 The War’s Impact American soldiers fire on German positions during the Battle of the Argonne Forest, 1918 Wilson 1913–1921 1915 1917 • German submarine • U.S. enters the war sinks the Lusitania • Selective Service Act passed U.S. PRESIDENTS U.S. EVENTS 1914 1916 WORLD EVENTS 1914 1916 1917 • Franz Ferdinand • Battle of Verdun begins • Bolshevik Revolution assassinated; war in February begins in October begins in Europe • Battle of the Somme begins in July 546 Chapter 16 World War I and Its Aftermath 5546_547_C16_CO_874521-7.indd46_547_C16_CO_874521-7.indd 554646 33/27/07/27/07 99:29:59:29:59 PPMM MAKING CONNECTIONS Why Do Nations Go to War? World War I was the fi rst time in American history that the United States sent troops to fi ght in Europe. This deci- sion ended the long-standing policy of remaining neutral in Europe’s wars. • Why do you think the United States changed its policy and sent troops to Europe? • Do you think it was a diffi cult decision? Organizing Information As you read the 1918 chapter, write information under each tab, listing • Congress passes Sedition Act 1919 1920 which country is in the alliance, why it joined • Armistice ends fighting on • Race riots and strikes take • Red scare and the alliance, or what November 11 place in Northern cities Palmer Raids reasons it had for disagreeing with iÌÀ> i` *ÜiÀÃ the countries in the *ÜiÀÃ 1918 1920 opposing alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Turkey's Foreign Policy: the Truman Doctrine and Turkey's Entry Into NATO
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1987 The Evolution of Turkey's Foreign Policy: The Truman Doctrine and Turkey's Entry into NATO Sinan Toprak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Toprak, Sinan, "The Evolution of Turkey's Foreign Policy: The Truman Doctrine and Turkey's Entry into NATO" (1987). Master's Theses. 1284. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1284 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF TURKEY'S FOREIGN POLICY: THE TRUMAN DOCTRINE AND TURKEY'S ENTRY INTO NATO fay Sinan Toprak A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 1987 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE EVOLUTION OF TURKEY'S FOREIGN POLICY: THE TRUMAN DOCTRINE AND TURKEY'S ENTRY INTO NATO Sinan Toprak, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1987 This thesis examines the historical development of Turkey's foreign policy up to the period immediately following World War II, and its decision to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The study begins with a survey of Turkey's geo­ political importance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of World War I
    IMPACTIMPACT OF OF WORLD WORLD WAR WAR I I •• WorldWorld War War I I has has been been called called a a ““warwar with with many many causes causes but but no no objectivesobjectives..”” •• ThisThis profound profound sense sense of of wastewaste andand pointlessness pointlessness willwill shape shape EuropeanEuropean politics politics in in the the post post-- warwar period. period. NewNew Horrors Horrors for for a a New New Century Century •• TotalTotal WarWar •• IndustrialIndustrial weaponsweapons ofof massmass--killingkilling •• ExtremeExtreme NationalismNationalism •• CiviliansCivilians targetedtargeted •• Genocide:Genocide: TurksTurks slaughterslaughter ArmeniansArmenians •• CommunistCommunist RevolutionRevolution •• TerrorismTerrorism AftermathAftermath ofof WorldWorld WarWar I:I: ConsequencesConsequences SocialSocial:: •• almostalmost 1010 millionmillion soldierssoldiers werewere killedkilled andand overover 2020 millionmillion areare woundedwounded •• millionsmillions ofof civilianscivilians dieddied asas aa resultresult ofof thethe hostilities,hostilities, famine,famine, andand diseasedisease •• thethe worldworld waswas leftleft withwith hatred,hatred, intolerance,intolerance, andand extremeextreme nationalism.nationalism. WorldWorld War War I I Casualties Casualties 10,000,000 9,000,000 Russia 8,000,000 Germany 7,000,000 Austria-Hungary 6,000,000 France 5,000,000 4,000,000 Great Britain 3,000,000 Italy 2,000,000 Turkey 1,000,000 US 0 TheThe Spanish Spanish Flu Flu (Influenza) (Influenza) -- 19181918 •• StruckStruck inin thethe
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Begins
    World War I Begins MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW Terms & Names As World War I intensified, The United States remains •nationalism •no man’s land the United States was forced involved in European and •militarism •trench warfare to abandon its neutrality. world affairs. •Allies •Lusitania •Central Powers •Zimmermann •Archduke Franz note Ferdinand One American's Story It was about 1:00 A.M. on April 6, 1917, and the members of the U.S. House of Representatives were tired. For the past 15 hours they had been debating President Wilson’s request for a declaration of war against Germany. There was a breathless hush as Jeannette Rankin of Montana, the first woman elected to Congress, stood up. Rankin declared, “I want to stand by my country but I can- not vote for war. I vote no.” Later she reflected on her action. A PERSONAL VOICE JEANNETTE RANKIN “ I believe that the first vote I cast was the most significant vote and a most significant act on the part of women, because women are going to have to stop war. I felt at the time that the first woman [in Congress] should take the first stand, that the first time the first woman had a chance to say no to war she should say it.” ▼ —quoted in Jeannette Rankin: First Lady in Congress Jeannette Rankin was the only member of the After much debate as to whether the United States should join the fight, House to vote against Congress voted in favor of U.S. entry into World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle of the First World War and Its Impact on the Balkans Birinci Dünya Savaşı’Nın Tarihi Ve Balkanlar’A Etkisi
    The Chronicle Of The First World War And Its Impact On The Balkans Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nın Tarihi ve Balkanlar’a Etkisi Erjada Progonati* Abstract The process of the two Balkan Wars (1912-1913) remained incomplete until the First World War started. The aim of this study is to give some informations about The First World War and the role that Balkan region played to this war when the national consciousness of Balkan peoples began to crystallize. After the two Balkan Wars, all the Balkan states continued their efforts to gather their co-nationals into their national states. It’s concluded that the Balkan Wars leaded to the internationalization of this crisis spreading it to an ample area while many other crises at the same region were resolved without a general war in Europe. It appears that the First World War that began in 1914 in the Balkan region was a continuation of the wars that started in 1912-1913 period in the same are. Key Words: World War I, Balkans, Nationalism, Balkan Wars, History. Özet İki Balkan Savaşı (1912-1913) süreci, Birinci Dünya Savaşı başlayana dek eksik kalmıştır. Bu çalış- manın amacı, Birinci Dünya Savaşı ve ulusal bilinçlerin belirginleşmeye başlayan Balkan halklarının savaşta oynadığı roller hakkında bazı bilgiler vermektir. İki Balkan Savaşlarından sonra bütün Balkan devletleri ulus-devletlerine ortak vatandaşlarını toplamak için çabalarını sürdürmüştür. Aynı bölgede birçok krizin Avrupa’da genel bir savaşa götürmeden çözüme kavuşurken Balkan Savaşları bu durumu daha geniş bir alana yayarak krizin uluslararasılaşmasına yol açtığı sonucuna varılmaktadır. 1914 yı- lında ve Balkanlar bölgesinde başlayan Birinci Dünya Savaşı, aynı bölgede ve 1912-1913 döneminde yaşanan savaşların devamı niteliğinde olduğu düşünülmektedir.
    [Show full text]