DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Status and the Use of Irrawaddy Dolphins As a Flagship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Status and the Use of Irrawaddy Dolphins As a Flagship Conservation status and the use of Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia Building Resilience to Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Southeast Asia (BCR) Brian Smith, Sun Kong and Lieng Saroeun INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE The designation of geographical entities in this Citation: Smith, B., Kong, S., and Saroeun, L. book, and the presentation of the material, do not (2014). Conservation status and the use of imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife the part of IUCN or the European Union concerning Sanctuary, Cambodia. Thailand: IUCN. 80pp. the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its Cover photo: Dolphins in Koh Kong Province, frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this Cambodia © IUCN Cambodia/Sun Kong publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, the European Union or any other participating Layout by: Ria Sen organizations. Produced by: IUCN Southeast Asia Group This publication has been made possible by funding from the European Union. Available from: IUCN Asia Regional Office Published by: IUCN Asia in Bangkok, Thailand 63 Soi Prompong, Sukhumvit 39, Wattana 10110 Bangkok, Thailand Copyright: © 2014 IUCN, International Union for Tel: +66 2 662 4029 Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN Cambodia Reproduction of this publication for educational or #6B, St. 368, Boeng Keng Kang III, other non-commercial purposes is authorized Chamkarmon, PO Box 1504, Phnom Penh, without prior written permission from the copyright Cambodia holder provided the source is fully acknowledgeRia d. Tel: +855 23 222 311 Reproduction of this publication for resale or other www.iucn.org/cambodia commercial purposes is prohibited without prior www.iucn.org/building-coastal-resilience written permission of the copyright holder. 1 Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Robert Mather, Head of Southeast Asia Group, IUCN, for initiating the dolphin assessment in the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary (PKWS) and adjacent coastal waters and mobilizing the survey team. Special thanks are given to H.E. Say Socheat, Deputy of Koh Kong Province, as well as other local authorities in Koh Kong who provided permission for us to bring dolphin survey equipment from Thailand. We also thank the Fisheries Administration for kindly supporting administrative work related to the project and offering the assistance of one of their officers to participate in the dolphin survey. We would like give our deep thanks to Mr. Kong Kimsreng, Senior Program Officer, IUCN Cambodia, for consistently providing helpful ideas and technical support. We are also grateful to Mr. Sorn Pheakdey for providing GIS assistance and producing the survey maps, and Mr. Lou Vanny for assistance in the field and advice on recommendations. Sincere thanks are given to IUCN’s Building Coastal Resilience network in the Kong Kong Province, including representatives from the Department of Environment, Fisheries Administration, PKWS and local communities who participated in the dolphin survey. Finally, we would like to gratefully acknowledge funding support from the European Union Project for the Building Coastal Resilience to Climate Change Impacts in Southeast Asia Project. 2 Foreword Building Resilience to Climate Change in Coastal Southeast Asia (BCR) is a four year EU- funded project working with communities and local government agencies in 8 provinces of Thailand, Cambodia and Viet Nam along the coastline between Bangkok and Ho Chi Minh City. Initial desk study reviews of likely climate change impacts on locally and nationally important species and habitats identified the coastal populations of the Irrawaddy dolphin in Trat Province of Thailand, and Koh Kong Province of Cambodia as a species of particular interest to the project. As predators, dolphins play an important role in maintaining the complexity of food webs and their stability in the face of climate change, while their sensitivity to prey movements and changes in coastal conditions make them a potentially good indicator of climate-induced change. At the same time dolphin watching eco-tourism may provide supplementary income opportunities for local people, with livelihood diversification being a key element of local climate change adaptation. In vulnerability and capacity assessments in these provinces, local stakeholders also reaffirmed this interest in Irrawaddy dolphins. While relatively more was already known about Irrawaddy dolphins in Trat, with an active local conservation group, and regular surveys conducted by the Department of Marine and Coastal Resources, it was found that there was very little knowledge or understanding of the situation of Irrawaddy dolphins in Koh Kong, and no active involvement in dolphin management of either local communities or local government agencies. In this context, the BCR project decided to support training of local government and local fishermen in survey methods, and to support baseline surveys of Irrawaddy dolphins and other coastal cetaceans in and around the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary (PKWS) of Koh Kong Province. Cetacean expert Brian Smith (WCS/IUCN Cetacean Specialist Group) led the training, surveys and report writing together with IUCN staff and local counterparts. This report presents the results of that work. Recommendations for dolphin conservation and management will be integrated as priority actions in the PKWS Management Plan, the development of which is also supported by BCR. At the same time, IUCN will make every effort to secure additional funding for dolphin conservation in this area over the longer term, beyond the lifetime of the BCR project. Robert Mather Head, IUCN Southeast Asia Group 3 Table of contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 2 Foreword .................................................................................................................................. 3 List of figures and tables ......................................................................................................... 5 Executive summary ................................................................................................................. 7 I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Previous research on cetaceans in Cambodia ............................................................. 9 1.2 Description and status of the three most common cetaceans in Cambodia .................. 9 1.3 Irrawady dolphins and climate adaptation ...................................................................10 1.4 Description of the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary and adjacent coastal waters ........11 II. Methods ...........................................................................................................................11 2.1 Training .......................................................................................................................11 2.2 Field survey techniques ..............................................................................................12 III. Results .............................................................................................................................13 3.1 Search results and cetacean sightings ........................................................................13 3.2 Environmental conditions ............................................................................................17 3.3 Photo-identification .....................................................................................................20 3.4 Census of fishing gear and sand mining dredges ........................................................22 IV. Discussion ....................................................................................................................26 4.1 Dolphin distribution, adundance, group sizes and habitat preference ..........................26 4.2 Range declines due to habitat disturbance .................................................................26 4.3 Photo-identification and evidence for fisheries interactions .........................................27 4.4 Fisheries and the potential for fatal entanglement of dolphins and porpoises ..............27 4.5 Implications for climate change adaptation .................................................................28 V. Conclusions and recommendations ..............................................................................29 5.1 Dolphin management areas ........................................................................................29 5.2 Educational outreach ..................................................................................................29 5.3 Research and monitoring ............................................................................................30 VI. References ....................................................................................................................31 VII. Appendices ...................................................................................................................34 7.1 Appendix 1: Handbook for a dolphin assessment in the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary History of the Porpoises
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/851469; this version posted November 22, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Evolutionary history of the porpoises (Phocoenidae) across the 2 speciation continuum: a mitogenome phylogeographic perspective 3 4 Yacine Ben Chehida1, Julie Thumloup1, Cassie Schumacher2, Timothy Harkins2, Alex 5 Aguilar3, Asunción Borrell3, Marisa Ferreira4, Lorenzo Rojas-Bracho5, Kelly M. Roberston6, 6 Barbara L. Taylor6, Gísli A. Víkingsson7, Arthur Weyna8, Jonathan Romiguier8, Phillip A. 7 Morin6, Michael C. Fontaine1,9* 8 9 1 Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, PO Box 11103 CC, 10 Groningen, The Netherlands 11 2 Swift Biosciences, 674 S. Wagner Rd., Suite 100, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA 12 3 IRBIO and Department of Evolutive Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, 13 University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08071 Barcelona, Spain 14 4 MATB-Sociedade Portuguesa de Vida Selvagem, Estação de Campo de Quiaios, Apartado EC Quiaios, 3080- 15 530 Figueira da Foz, Portugal & CPRAM-Ecomare, Estrada do Porto de Pesca Costeira, 3830-565 Gafanha da 16 Nazaré, Portugal 17 5 Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, 18 Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Fraccionamiento Zona Playitas, Ensenada, BC 22860, Mexico 19 6 Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 8901 La Jolla Shores Dr., La 20 Jolla, California 92037, USA 21 7 Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, PO Box 1390, 121 Reykjavik, Iceland 22 8 Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution (Université de Montpellier, CNRS UMR 5554), Montpellier, France 23 9 Laboratoire MIVEGEC (Université de Montpellier, UMR CNRS 5290, IRD 229), Centre IRD de Montpellier, 24 Montpellier, France 25 26 *Corresponding author: Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsustainable Food Systems Threaten Wild Crop and Dolphin Species
    INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until: 07:00 GMT (16:00 JST) 5 December 2017 Elaine Paterson, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Goska Bonnaveira, IUCN Media Relations, m +41 792760185, email [email protected] [In Japan] Cheryl-Samantha MacSharry, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Download photographs here Download summary statistics here Unsustainable food systems threaten wild crop and dolphin species Tokyo, Japan, 5 December 2017 (IUCN) – Species of wild rice, wheat and yam are threatened by overly intensive agricultural production and urban expansion, whilst poor fishing practices have caused steep declines in the Irrawaddy Dolphin and Finless Porpoise, according to the latest update of The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Today’s Red List update also reveals that a drying climate is pushing the Ringtail Possum to the brink of extinction. Three reptile species found only on an Australian island – the Christmas Island Whiptail-skink, the Blue- tailed Skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and the Lister’s Gecko – have gone extinct, according to the update. But in New Zealand, conservation efforts have improved the situation for two species of Kiwi. “Healthy, species-rich ecosystems are fundamental to our ability to feed the world’s growing population and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 – to end hunger by 2030,” says IUCN Director General Inger Andersen. “Wild crop species, for example, maintain genetic diversity of agricultural crops
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Factors Influencing Group Sizes of River Dolphins (Inia Geoffrensis and Sotalia Fluviatilis)
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, **(*): ***–*** (*** 2011) C 2011 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00496.x Ecological factors influencing group sizes of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) CATALINA GOMEZ-SALAZAR Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada and Foundation Omacha, Calle 86A No. 23–38, Bogota, Colombia E-mail: [email protected] FERNANDO TRUJILLO Foundation Omacha, Calle 86A No. 23–38, Bogota, Colombia HAL WHITEHEAD Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada ABSTRACT Living in groups is usually driven by predation and competition for resources. River dolphins do not have natural predators but inhabit dynamic systems with predictable seasonal shifts. These ecological features may provide some insight into the forces driving group formation and help us to answer questions such as why river dolphins have some of the smallest group sizes of cetaceans, and why group sizes vary with time and place. We analyzed observations of group size for Inia and Sotalia over a 9 yr period. In the Amazon, largest group sizes occurred in main rivers and lakes, particularly during the low water season when resources are concentrated; smaller group sizes occurred in constricted waters (channels, tributaries, and confluences) that receive an influx of blackwaters that are poor in nutrients and sediments. In the Orinoco, the largest group sizes occurred during the transitional water season when the aquatic productivity increases. The largest group size of Inia occurred in the Orinoco location that contains the influx of two highly productive whitewater rivers. Flood pulses govern productivity and major biological factors of these river basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • Beluga Whale Pvhl Enhances HIF-2A Activity Via Inducing
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 26), pp: 42272-42287 Research Paper Beluga whale pVHL enhances HIF-2α activity via inducing HIF- 2α proteasomal degradation under hypoxia Jianling Bi1, Bo Hu1, Jing Wang1, Xing Liu1, Jinsong Zheng1, Ding Wang1 and Wuhan Xiao1,2 1The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, P. R. China 2State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, P. R. China Correspondence to: Wuhan Xiao, email: [email protected] Ding Wang, email: [email protected] Keywords: beluga whale, cetaceans, hypoxia, HIF-2α, VHL Received: October 09, 2016 Accepted: January 09, 2017 Published: February 02, 2017 Copyright: Bi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Aquatic mammals, such as cetaceans experience various depths, with accordingly diverse oxygenation, thus, cetaceans have developed adaptations for hypoxia, but mechanisms underlying this tolerance to low oxygen are unclear. Here we analyzed VHL and HIF-2α, in the hypoxia signaling pathway. Variations in VHL are greater than HIF-2α between cetaceans and terrestrial mammals, and beluga whale VHL (BW-VHL) promotes HIF-2α degradation under hypoxia. BW-VHL catalyzes BW-HIF-2α to form K48-linked poly- ubiquitin chains mainly at the lysine 429 of BW-HIF-2α (K429) and induces BW-HIF-2α for proteasomal degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS and CONSERVATION of FRESHWATER POPULATIONS of IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D
    WORKING PAPER NO. 31 MAY 2007 STATUS AND CONSERVATION OF FRESHWATER POPULATIONS OF IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D. Smith, Robert G. Shore and Alvin Lopez WORKING PAPER NO. 31 MAY 2007 sTATUS AND CONSERVATION OF FRESHWATER POPULATIONS OF IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D. Smith, Robert G. Shore and Alvin Lopez WCS Working Papers: ISSN 1530-4426 Copies of the WCS Working Papers are available at http://www.wcs.org/science Cover photographs by: Isabel Beasley (top, Mekong), Danielle Kreb (middle, Mahakam), Brian D. Smith (bottom, Ayeyarwady) Copyright: The contents of this paper are the sole property of the authors and cannot be reproduced without permission of the authors. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) saves wildlife and wild lands around the world. We do this through science, conservation, education, and the man- agement of the world's largest system of urban wildlife parks, led by the flag- ship Bronx Zoo. Together, these activities inspire people to imagine wildlife and humans living together sustainably. WCS believes that this work is essential to the integrity of life on earth. Over the past century, WCS has grown and diversified to include four zoos, an aquarium, over 100 field conservation projects, local and international educa- tion programs, and a wildlife health program. To amplify this dispersed con- servation knowledge, the WCS Institute was established as an internal “think tank” to coordinate WCS expertise for specific conservation opportunities and to analyze conservation and academic trends that provide opportunities to fur- ther conservation effectiveness. The Institute disseminates WCS' conservation work via papers and workshops, adding value to WCS' discoveries and experi- ence by sharing them with partner organizations, policy-makers, and the pub- lic.
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Watching New South Wales Australia
    Whale Watching New South Wales Australia Including • About Whales • Humpback Whales • Whale Migration • Southern Right Whales • Whale Life Cycle • Blue Whales • Whales in Sydney Harbour • Minke Whales • Aboriginal People & Whales • Dolphins • Typical Whale Behaviour • Orcas • Whale Species • Other Whale Species • Whales in Australia • Other Marine Species About Whales The whale species you are most likely to see along the New South Wales Coastline are • Humpback Whale • Southern Right Whale Throughout June and July Humpback Whales head north for breading before return south with their calves from September to November. Other whale species you may see include: • Minke Whale • Blue Whale • Sei Whale • Fin Whale • False Killer Whale • Orca or Killer Whale • Sperm Whale • Pygmy Right Whale • Pygmy Sperm Whale • Bryde’s Whale Oceans cover about 70% of the Earth’s surface and this vast environment is home to some of the Earth’s most fascinating creatures: whales. Whales are complex, often highly social and intelligent creatures. They are mammals like us. They breath air, have hair on their bodies (though only very little), give birth to live young and suckle their calves through mammary glands. But unlike us, whales are perfectly adapted to the marine environment with strong, muscular and streamlined bodies insulated by thick layers of blubber to keep them warm. Whales are gentle animals that have graced the planet for over 50 million years and are present in all oceans of the world. They capture our imagination like few other animals. The largest species of whales were hunted almost to extinction in the last few hundred years and have survived only thanks to conservation and protection efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocation of Trapped Bolivian River Dolphins (Inia Boliviensis)
    J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 21: 17–23, 2020 17 Translocation of trapped Bolivian river dolphins (Inia boliviensis) ENZO ALIAGA-ROSSEL1,3AND MARIANA ESCOBAR-WW2 Contact e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Bolivian river dolphin, locally known as the bufeo, is the only cetacean in land-locked Bolivia. Knowledge about its conservation status and vulnerability to anthropogenic actions is extremely deficient. We report on the rescue and translocation of 26 Bolivian river dolphins trapped in a shrinking segment of the Pailas River, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Several institutions, authorities and volunteers collaborated to translocate the dolphins, which included calves, juveniles, and pregnant females. The dolphins were successfully released into the Río Grande. Each dolphin was accompanied by biologists who assured their welfare. No detectable injuries occurred and none of the dolphins died during this process. If habitat degradation continues, it is likely that events in which river dolphins become trapped in South America may happen more frequently in the future. KEYWORDS: BOLIVIAN RIVER DOLPHIN; HABITAT DEGRADATION; CONSERVATION; STRANDINGS; TRANSLOCATION; SOUTH AMERICA INTRODUCTION distinct species, geographically isolated from the boto or Small cetaceans are facing several threats from direct or Amazon River dolphin (I. geoffrensis) (Gravena et al., 2014; indirect human impacts (Reeves et al., 2000). The pressure Ruiz-Garcia et al., 2008). This species has been categorised on South American and Asian river dolphins is increasing; by the Red Book of Wildlife Vertebrates of Bolivia as evidently, different river systems have very different problems. Vulnerable (VU), highlighting the need to conserve and Habitat degradation, dam construction, modification of river protect them from existing threats (Aguirre et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammal Collections in Australia
    Proceedings of the 7th and 8th Symposia on Collection Building and Natural History Studies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by Y. Tomida et al., National Science Museum Monographs, (34): 117–126, 2006. Marine Mammal Collections in Australia Tadasu K. Yamada1, Catherine Kemper2, Yuko Tajima3, Ayako Umetani4, Heather Janetzki5 and David Pemberton6 1 Department of Zoology, National Science Museum (e-mail: [email protected]) 2 Vertebrates Department, South Australian Museum (e-mail: [email protected]) 3 Univeristy of Texas, Medical Branch (e-mail: [email protected]) 4 Graduate School of Veterinary Science, Azabu University (e-mail: [email protected]) 5 Section of Vertebrates, Queensland Museum (e-mail: [email protected]) 6 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (e-mail: [email protected]) with assistance in compiling museum collections from: Wayne Longmore, National Museum of Victoria Sandy Ingleby, Australian Museum Norah Cooper, Western Australian Museum Brian Smith, Queen Victoria Museum Gavin Dally, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory Robert Palmer, National Wildlife Collection (CSIRO) Abstract Museums in Australia house over 5500 marine mammal specimens in nine major institu- tions. These collections are here summarized with a view to making them more accessible to re- searchers throughout the world. Fifty-eight species of marine mammal are known from Australian waters. These and many more from elsewhere are represented in the collections. Australian museums are an important source of material for wide-ranging studies on marine mammals, including refining the taxonomy of difficult and cosmopolitan genera such as Tursiops and Delphinus, and species such as beaked whales that are rare in world collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Snubfin Dolphin ©
    Species Fact Sheet: Snubfin dolphin © G u i d o J . P a r r a Snubfin Dolphin Orcaella heinsohni In 2005 a new species of dolphin was found in Australian waters, the Australian snubfin dolphin. The discovery of a new mammal is extremely rare. Until recently the snubfin dolphin was thought to be an Irrawaddy dolphin, which is found in coastal areas and major rivers of south-east Asia, and is in serious decline. The snubfin dolphin is Australia’s only endemic dolphin, meaning it is unique to northern Australia. Coastal and river dolphins are among the most threatened species of mammal in the world. Snubfin dolphins, like all dolphin species, are toothed cetaceans and therefore have one blow hole and are generally smaller in size compared with the baleen cetaceans like the humpback whale. © G u i d o J . P a r r a Conservation status The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Redlist of Threatened Species: Data deficient Australian Government - Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Data deficient Did you know? Conservation action • Snubfin dolphins were named after George Because so little is known about Australia’s coastal Heinsohn, an Australian biologist who worked at dolphins, research is essential in order to identify important James Cook University in the 1960s and 1970s - habitat, collect baseline information and determine if the Orcaella heinsohni. different populations are related to each other. • Snubfin dolphins are cetaceans, like whales, and Using boat-based surveys, photo-identification and tissue have a blow hole, which is the equivalent to a sampling methods, vital information will be gathered about human nostril that they breathe through.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure2 Taxonomic Revision of the Dolphin Genus Lagenorhynchus
    A) LeDuc et al. 1999, Figure 1 - cyt b (1,140 bp) B) May-Collado & Agnarsson 2006, Figure 2 - cyt b (578 or 1,140 bp) C) Agnarsson & May-Collado 2008, Figure 5 - cyt b (578 or 1,140 bp) 100/100/34 100 100/100 Phocoena spp. Phocoenidae Phocoenidae 65/92 100/100/23 85 Monodontidae 100/100 Feresa attenuata 100 Monodontidae Monodontidae 58/79/1 94/92 Peponocephala electra Orcaella brevirostris 98/99/6 100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Orcinus orca Globicephala spp. 97/97/9 98 Cephalorhynchus eutropia 100/100 Globicephala spp. Grampus griseus 51/57 80 Cephalorhynchus hectori 55/69 Peponocephala electra Pseudorca crassidens Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 100/100 58/77 Feresa attenuata Orcinus orca 100/100 96 Lagenorhynchus australis Grampus griseus 98/89/9 Orcaella sp. Lagenorhynchus cruciger Pseudorca crassidens 100 99 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 100/100/13 Lissodelphis borealis 100/100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Lissodelphis peronii Lagenorhynchus obscurus 99/99 Cephalorhynchus eutropia 56/69/1 Lagenorhynchus obscurus 100 Lissodelphis borealis 73/78 Cephalorhynchus hectori Lagenorhynchus obliquidens Lissodelphis peronii 64/62 Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 100/100/9 100/99/8 Lagenorhynchus cruciger 100 27/X 100/100 Lagenorhynchus australis Delphinus sp. 95/96 Lagenorhynchus australis Lagenorhynchus cruciger 98/99/12 99 Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 59 95 Stenella clymene 100/100 100/100 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 63/57/ Lagenorhynchus obscurus 2 Cephalorhynchus hectori 100 Stenella coeruleoalba Cephalorhynchus eutropia Stenella frontalis 100/100 Lissodelphis borealis 98/99/5 Cephalorhynchus commersonii 57 Tursiops truncatus Lissodelphis peronii Lagenodelphis hosei Lagenorhynchus albirostris 100/100 100 Sousa chinensis Delphinus sp. Lagenorhynchus acutus 77/77 * Stenella attenuata 99/99 Stenella clymene Steno bredanensis 69 93/89 * Stenella longirostris Stenella coeruleoalba 37/X 99/99 Sotalia fluviatilis 68 51 Sotalia fluviatilis 100 100/100 Stenella frontalis Steno bredanensis Sousa chinensis 43/88 Tursiops aduncus 76/78/2 Lagenorhynchus acutus Tursiops truncatus Stenella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammal Taxonomy
    Marine Mammal Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia (Animals) Phylum: Chordata (Animals with notochords) Subphylum: Vertebrata (Vertebrates) Class: Mammalia (Mammals) Order: Cetacea (Cetaceans) Suborder: Mysticeti (Baleen Whales) Family: Balaenidae (Right Whales) Balaena mysticetus Bowhead whale Eubalaena australis Southern right whale Eubalaena glacialis North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena japonica North Pacific right whale Family: Neobalaenidae (Pygmy Right Whale) Caperea marginata Pygmy right whale Family: Eschrichtiidae (Grey Whale) Eschrichtius robustus Grey whale Family: Balaenopteridae (Rorquals) Balaenoptera acutorostrata Minke whale Balaenoptera bonaerensis Arctic Minke whale Balaenoptera borealis Sei whale Balaenoptera edeni Byrde’s whale Balaenoptera musculus Blue whale Balaenoptera physalus Fin whale Megaptera novaeangliae Humpback whale Order: Cetacea (Cetaceans) Suborder: Odontoceti (Toothed Whales) Family: Physeteridae (Sperm Whale) Physeter macrocephalus Sperm whale Family: Kogiidae (Pygmy and Dwarf Sperm Whales) Kogia breviceps Pygmy sperm whale Kogia sima Dwarf sperm whale DOLPHIN R ESEARCH C ENTER , 58901 Overseas Hwy, Grassy Key, FL 33050 (305) 289 -1121 www.dolphins.org Family: Platanistidae (South Asian River Dolphin) Platanista gangetica gangetica South Asian river dolphin (also known as Ganges and Indus river dolphins) Family: Iniidae (Amazon River Dolphin) Inia geoffrensis Amazon river dolphin (boto) Family: Lipotidae (Chinese River Dolphin) Lipotes vexillifer Chinese river dolphin (baiji) Family: Pontoporiidae (Franciscana)
    [Show full text]