DOCSLIB.ORG

Figure2 Taxonomic Revision of the Dolphin Genus Lagenorhynchus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Figure2 Taxonomic Revision of the Dolphin Genus Lagenorhynchus A) LeDuc et al. 1999, Figure 1 - cyt b (1,140 bp) B) May-Collado & Agnarsson 2006, Figure 2 - cyt b (578 or 1,140 bp) C) Agnarsson & May-Collado 2008, Figure 5 - cyt b (578 or 1,140 bp) 100/100/34 100 100/100 Phocoena spp. Phocoenidae Phocoenidae 65/92 100/100/23 85 Monodontidae 100/100 Feresa attenuata 100 Monodontidae Monodontidae 58/79/1 94/92 Peponocephala electra Orcaella brevirostris 98/99/6 100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Orcinus orca Globicephala spp. 97/97/9 98 Cephalorhynchus eutropia 100/100 Globicephala spp. Grampus griseus 51/57 80 Cephalorhynchus hectori 55/69 Peponocephala electra Pseudorca crassidens Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 100/100 58/77 Feresa attenuata Orcinus orca 100/100 96 Lagenorhynchus australis Grampus griseus 98/89/9 Orcaella sp. Lagenorhynchus cruciger Pseudorca crassidens 100 99 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 100/100/13 Lissodelphis borealis 100/100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Lissodelphis peronii Lagenorhynchus obscurus 99/99 Cephalorhynchus eutropia 56/69/1 Lagenorhynchus obscurus 100 Lissodelphis borealis 73/78 Cephalorhynchus hectori Lagenorhynchus obliquidens Lissodelphis peronii 64/62 Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 100/100/9 100/99/8 Lagenorhynchus cruciger 100 27/X 100/100 Lagenorhynchus australis Delphinus sp. 95/96 Lagenorhynchus australis Lagenorhynchus cruciger 98/99/12 99 Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 59 95 Stenella clymene 100/100 100/100 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 63/57/ Lagenorhynchus obscurus 2 Cephalorhynchus hectori 100 Stenella coeruleoalba Cephalorhynchus eutropia Stenella frontalis 100/100 Lissodelphis borealis 98/99/5 Cephalorhynchus commersonii 57 Tursiops truncatus Lissodelphis peronii Lagenodelphis hosei Lagenorhynchus albirostris 100/100 100 Sousa chinensis Delphinus sp. Lagenorhynchus acutus 77/77 * Stenella attenuata 99/99 Stenella clymene Steno bredanensis 69 93/89 * Stenella longirostris Stenella coeruleoalba 37/X 99/99 Sotalia fluviatilis 68 51 Sotalia fluviatilis 100 100/100 Stenella frontalis Steno bredanensis Sousa chinensis 43/88 Tursiops aduncus 76/78/2 Lagenorhynchus acutus Tursiops truncatus Stenella spp. 55/X 92/94/5 Feresa attenuata 62/X Sousa chinensis Delphinus sp. * Stenella attenuata 100 100/100 100/100/16 Stenella frontalis 100 Globicephala spp. Lagenodelphis hosei Tursiops aduncus Grampus griseus 87/87 Stenella longirostris 69/58/3 100/100 Tursiops truncatus Peponocephala electra 68/67 Sotalia spp. Stenella attenuata Pseudorca crassidens Steno bredanensis Lagenodelphis hosei 71 Orcaella brevirostris 49/40 100/NA Lagenorhynchus acutus Stenella longirostris Orcinus orca Lagenorhynchus albirostris** Slater et al. 2010, Figure 1 - cyt b (1,140 bp) Pichler et al. 2001, Figure 1 - mtCR (442 bp) Harlin-Cognato & Honeycutt 2006, Figure 2 - cyt b + mtCR + Actin + RAG2 D) E) F) (3,083 bp) Phocoena dioptrica Monodontidae 70/1 Lagenorhynchus obscurus Phocoena phocoena Phocoenidae 60/2 100/8 Orcinus orca Orcinus orca <50/1 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens Orcaella brevirostris 100/27/100 99/4 Stenella, Delphinus, Tursiops spp. Pseudorca crassidens 58/2 Lagenorhynchus australis Grampus griseus <50/1/~ Lagenorhynchus cruciger 100/38/100 Feresa attenuata Lagenorhynchus acutus 84/2 * Globicephala spp. 100/ Cephalorhynchus commersonii <50/1/~ 102/ Lagenorhynchus albirostris Lagenorhynchus acutus 100 100/44/100 57/2 * Lagenorhynchus albirostris* Lissodelphis peronii Lissodelphis borealis * 100/14/100 Lagenorhynchus obscurus 100/3/~ Lissodelphis borealis Cephalorhynchus eutropia Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 100/11/100 Lagenorhynchus cruciger 62/2 Lagenorhynchus cruciger 87/3 99/7/100 Lagenorhynchus australis Cephalorhynchus heavisidii Lagenorhynchus australis Cephalorhynchus hectori 100/18/100 100/13/100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 96/4 Cephalorhynchus hectori Sotalia fluviatilis 57/3/100 Steno bredanensis Cephalorhynchus hectori Stenella longirostris 53/3/100 74/3/100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii 52/1 Sousa chinensis 99/6/100 Cephalorhynchus eutropia Lagenodelphis hosei 99/5/100 Stenella attenuata 100/8/100 95/5 <50/1/86 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens Tursiops truncatus Cephalorhynchus heavisidii Stenella frontalis Delphinus delphis 82/5/100 Stenella coeruleoalba Lagenorhynchus obscurus Stenella clymene Lissodelphis peronii 100/10/100.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecological Factors Influencing Group Sizes of River Dolphins (Inia Geoffrensis and Sotalia Fluviatilis)
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, **(*): ***–*** (*** 2011) C 2011 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00496.x Ecological factors influencing group sizes of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) CATALINA GOMEZ-SALAZAR Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada and Foundation Omacha, Calle 86A No. 23–38, Bogota, Colombia E-mail: [email protected] FERNANDO TRUJILLO Foundation Omacha, Calle 86A No. 23–38, Bogota, Colombia HAL WHITEHEAD Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada ABSTRACT Living in groups is usually driven by predation and competition for resources. River dolphins do not have natural predators but inhabit dynamic systems with predictable seasonal shifts. These ecological features may provide some insight into the forces driving group formation and help us to answer questions such as why river dolphins have some of the smallest group sizes of cetaceans, and why group sizes vary with time and place. We analyzed observations of group size for Inia and Sotalia over a 9 yr period. In the Amazon, largest group sizes occurred in main rivers and lakes, particularly during the low water season when resources are concentrated; smaller group sizes occurred in constricted waters (channels, tributaries, and confluences) that receive an influx of blackwaters that are poor in nutrients and sediments. In the Orinoco, the largest group sizes occurred during the transitional water season when the aquatic productivity increases. The largest group size of Inia occurred in the Orinoco location that contains the influx of two highly productive whitewater rivers. Flood pulses govern productivity and major biological factors of these river basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of English Channel Cetaceans Stranded on the Coast of Normandy
    International Council for the CM 2003/N:03 Exploration of the Sea Theme Session on Size-Dependency in Marine and freshwater Ecosystems (Session N) Diet of English Channel cetaceans stranded on the coast of Normandy by de Pierrepont J. F.1, Dubois B.1, Desormonts S.1, Santos M. B.2 and Robin J.P.1 1 Laboratoire de Biologie et Biotechnologies Marines, I.B.F.A., Université de Caen, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen Cedex France ([email protected]) 2 Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK Abstract: During 1998-2003 stomach contents of 47 cetacean were obtained from strandings on the coast of Normandy. These animals were examined by a veterinary network an stomach contents were analysed at the University of Caen: 26 common dolphins (Delphinus delphis), 4 bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) 7 harbour porpoises (Phocoena phoecoena) and 5 grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) 2 long-finned pilot whale (Globicephala melas) 1 white beaked dolphin (Lagenorhynchus albirostris) 1 minke whale (Balaenoptera acurostrata) 1 Stenella coeruleoalba. Food items determination was based on hard parts (i.e. fish otoliths and cephalopod beaks). Diet indices were computed including prey frequency and percentage by number. Common dolphins eat mainly gadoid fish (Trisopterus sp), gobies and mackerel. Cephalpods occur in small numbers and fished Cephalopod species (cuttlefish and common squid) are scarce. The results are analysed in the light of previously published data and the food regime of English Channel top predators is compared to the one of other populations. Keywords: Stomach contents, cetaceans, trophic relationships. Résumé: De 1998 à 2003 les contenus stomacaux de 47 cétacés échoués sur les côtes de Normandie ont été récoltés.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Spotted Dolphin (Stenella Frontalis) and Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops Truncatus) Nearshore Distribution, Bimini, the Bahamas
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 4-29-2020 Atlantic Spotted Dolphin (Stenella frontalis) and Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Nearshore Distribution, Bimini, The Bahamas Skylar L. Muller Nova Southeastern University Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Skylar L. Muller. 2020. Atlantic Spotted Dolphin (Stenella frontalis) and Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Nearshore Distribution, Bimini, The Bahamas. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, . (530) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/530. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thesis of Skylar L. Muller Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science M.S. Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography April 2020 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor: Amy C. Hirons, Ph.D. Committee Member: Kathleen M. Dudzinski, Ph.D. Committee Member: Bernhard Riegl, Ph.D. This thesis is available at NSUWorks: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/530 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY HALMOS COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Status of the Genus Sotalia: Species Level Ranking for “Tucuxi” (Sotalia Fluviatilis) and “Costero” (Sotalia Guianensis) Dolphins
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, **(*): ***–*** (*** 2007) C 2007 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00110.x TAXONOMIC STATUS OF THE GENUS SOTALIA: SPECIES LEVEL RANKING FOR “TUCUXI” (SOTALIA FLUVIATILIS) AND “COSTERO” (SOTALIA GUIANENSIS) DOLPHINS S. CABALLERO Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand and Fundacion´ Omacha, Diagonal 86A #30–38, Bogota,´ Colombia F. TRUJILLO Fundacion´ Omacha, Diagonal 86A #30–38, Bogota,´ Colombia J. A. VIANNA Sala L3–244, Departamento de Biologia Geral, ICB, Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627 C. P. 486, 31270–010 Belo Horizonte, Brazil and Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ecologia y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Andres Bello Republica 252, Santigo, Chile H. BARRIOS-GARRIDO Laboratorio de Sistematica´ de Invertebrados Acuaticos´ (LASIA), Postgrado en Ciencias Biologicas,´ Facultad Experimental de Ciencias,Universidad del Zulia, Avenida Universidad con prolongacion´ Avenida 5 de Julio, Sector Grano de Oro, Maracaibo, Venezuela M. G. MONTIEL Laboratorio de Ecologıa´ y Genetica´ de Poblaciones, Centro de Ecologıa,´ Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientıficas´ (IVIC), San Antonio de los Altos, Carretera Panamericana km 11, Altos de Pipe, Estado Miranda, Venezuela S. BELTRAN´ -PEDREROS Laboratorio de Zoologia,´ Colec¸ao˜ Zoologica´ Paulo Burheim, Centro Universitario´ Luterano de Manaus, Manaus, Brazil 1 2 MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, VOL. **, NO. **, 2007 M. MARMONTEL Sociedade Civil Mamiraua,´ Rua Augusto Correa No.1 Campus do Guama,´ Setor Professional, Guama,´ C. P. 8600, 66075–110 Belem,´ Brazil M. C. SANTOS Projeto Atlantis/Instituto de Biologia da Conservac¸ao,˜ Laboratorio´ de Biologia da Conservac¸ao˜ de Cetaceos,´ Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus Rio Claro, Sao˜ Paulo, Brazil M.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometrics of the Dolphin Genus Lagenorhynchus: Deciphering A
    Morphometrics of the dolphin genus Lagenorhynchus: deciphering a contested phylogeny Allison Galezo1,2 and Nicole Vollmer1,3 1 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History 2 Department of Biology, Georgetown University 3 NOAA National Systematics Laboratory Background Results & Analysis Discussion • Our morphological data support the hypothesis that Figure 1. Phenogram from cluster analysis of dolphin skull Figure 2. Species symbols key with sample sizes. measurements. Calculated using Euclidian distances and the genus Lagenorhynchus is not monophyletic, evident Height l La. acutus (24) p C. commersonii (5) a b c Ward’s method. from the separation in the phenogram of La. albirostris Height p C. eutropia (2) Recent phylogenetic studies1-7 have indicated that the Distance l La. albirostris (10) and La. acutus from the other Lagenorhynchus species, 0 2 4 6 8 p genus Lagenorhynchus, currently containing the species 0 2 4 6 8 l La. australis (7) C. heavisidii (1) u Li. borealis (11) and the mix of genera in the lowermost clade (Figure 1). L. obliquidensa, L. acutusb , L. albirostrisc, L. obscurusd , L. l La. obliquidens (28) p C. hectori (2) n Unknown (1) • Our results show that La. obscurus and La. obliquidens e f cruciger , and L. australis , is not monophyletic. These C. commersonii l La. obscurus (15) are very similar morphologically, which supports the C. commersonii species were originally grouped together because of C.C. cocommemmersoniirsonii C. commeC. hersoniictori hypothesis that they are closely related: they have C. commeC. hersoniictori similarities in external morphology and coloration, but C. commeC. hersoniictori Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status and the Use of Irrawaddy Dolphins As a Flagship
    Conservation status and the use of Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia Building Resilience to Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Southeast Asia (BCR) Brian Smith, Sun Kong and Lieng Saroeun INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE The designation of geographical entities in this Citation: Smith, B., Kong, S., and Saroeun, L. book, and the presentation of the material, do not (2014). Conservation status and the use of imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife the part of IUCN or the European Union concerning Sanctuary, Cambodia. Thailand: IUCN. 80pp. the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its Cover photo: Dolphins in Koh Kong Province, frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this Cambodia © IUCN Cambodia/Sun Kong publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, the European Union or any other participating Layout by: Ria Sen organizations. Produced by: IUCN Southeast Asia Group This publication has been made possible by funding from the European Union. Available from: IUCN Asia Regional Office Published by: IUCN Asia in Bangkok, Thailand 63 Soi Prompong, Sukhumvit 39, Wattana 10110 Bangkok, Thailand Copyright: © 2014 IUCN, International Union for Tel: +66 2 662 4029 Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN Cambodia Reproduction of this publication for educational or #6B, St. 368, Boeng Keng Kang III, other non-commercial purposes is authorized Chamkarmon, PO Box 1504, Phnom Penh, without prior written permission from the copyright Cambodia holder provided the source is fully acknowledgeRia d.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT-FINNED PILOT WHALE (Globicephala Macrorhynchus): Western North Atlantic Stock
    February 2019 SHORT-FINNED PILOT WHALE (Globicephala macrorhynchus): Western North Atlantic Stock STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE There are two species of pilot whales in the western North Atlantic - the long-finned pilot whale, Globicephala melas melas, and the short-finned pilot whale, G. macrorhynchus. These species are difficult to differentiate at sea and cannot be reliably visually identified during either abundance surveys or observations of fishery mortality without high-quality photographs (Rone and Pace 2012); therefore, the ability to separately assess the two species in U.S. Atlantic waters is complex and requires additional information on seasonal spatial distribution. Pilot whales (Globicephala sp.) in the western North Atlantic occur primarily along the continental shelf break from Florida to the Nova Scotia Shelf (Mullin and Fulling 2003). Long-finned and short- finned pilot whales overlap spatially along the mid-Atlantic shelf break between Delaware and the southern flank of Georges Bank (Payne and Heinemann 1993; Rone and Pace 2012). Long-finned pilot whales have occasionally been observed stranded as far south as South Carolina, and short- finned pilot whales have occasionally been observed stranded as far north as Massachusetts (Pugliares et al. 2016). The exact latitudinal ranges of the two species remain uncertain. However, south of Cape Hatteras most pilot whale sightings are expected to be short- Figure 1. Distribution of long-finned (open symbols), short-finned finned pilot whales, while north of (black symbols), and possibly mixed (gray symbols; could be ~42°N most pilot whale sightings are either species) pilot whale sightings from NEFSC and SEFSC expected to be long-finned pilot whales shipboard and aerial surveys during the summers of 1998, 1999, (Figure 1; Garrison and Rosel 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammal Monitoring Surveys in Support Of
    Marine Mammal Monitoring Surveys in Support of “Valiant Shield” Training Exercises (Aug. 13-17, 2007)-- Final Report Photo by L. Mazucca Final Report Submitted to: Environmental Division Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet Submitted by: Joseph R. Mobley, Jr., PhD dba: Marine Mammal Research Consultants Date: September 10, 2007 2 Marine Mammal Monitoring Surveys in support of “Valiant Shield” Training Exercises (Aug. 13-17, 2007)—Final Report Prepared by: Joseph Mobley, PhD, dba: Marine Mammal Research Consultants (MMRC) Summary Aerial surveys of marine mammal and turtle species were conducted during the period Aug. 13- 17, 2007 following completion of the “Valiant Shield” naval exercises in waters off the Northern Mariana Islands. Surveys encompassed approximately 2,352 km of linear effort, with transect grids distributed randomly throughout a 163,300 km2 target area (Area 2 in Appendix A). Size and placement of transect grids were limited by the range of the twin-engine aircraft (Cessna 337). Seastate conditions were excellent (mean Beaufort seastate = 2.2), however survey effort was limited on a daily basis due to unstable weather conditions. Survey crew consisted of a data recorder and two NOAA-trained observers. All surveys were conducted at 305 m (1000 ft) altitude at an average 100 knot groundspeed. The first day of survey effort involved circumnavigating the islands of Guam and Rota to detect any dead or stranded animals. None were detected. The remaining four survey days involved flying randomly distributed transect grids. A total of 8 sightings were recorded during the five-day period including 7 cetacean and 1 unidentified turtle species.
    [Show full text]
  • Subpart X—Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals
    National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 218.230 without prior notification and an op- (Balaena mysticetus), Bryde’s whale portunity for public comment. Notifi- (Balaenoptera edeni), fin whale cation will be published in the FED- (Balaenoptera physalus), gray whale ERAL REGISTER within 30 days subse- (Eschrichtius robustus), humpback whale quent to the action. (Megaptera novaeangliae), minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), North At- Subparts S–W [Reserved] lantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis), North Pacific right whale (Eubalena ja- Subpart X—Taking and Importing ponica), pygmy right whale of Marine Mammals; Navy (Caperamarginata), sei whale Operations of Surveillance (Balaenoptera borealis), southern right Towed Array Sensor System whale (Eubalaena australis), Low Frequency Active (2) Odontocetes–Andrew’s beaked (SURTASS LFA) Sonar whale (Mesoplodon bowdoini), Arnoux’s beaked whale (Berardius arnuxii), At- lantic spotted dolphin (Stenella fron- SOURCE: 77 FR 50316, Aug. 20, 2012, unless otherwise noted. talis), Atlantic white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus acutus), Baird’s EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 77 FR 50316, Aug. beaked whale (Berardius bairdii), Beluga 20, 2012, subpart X was added, effective Aug. 15, 2012, through Aug. 15, 2017. whale (Dephinapterus leucas), Blainville’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon § 218.230 Specified activity, level of densirostris), Chilean dolphin taking, and species. (Cephalorhynchus eutropia), Clymene Regulations in this subpart apply dolphin (Stenella clymene), only to the incidental taking of those Commerson’s dolphin (Cephalorhynchus marine mammal species specified in commersonii), common bottlenose dol- paragraph (b) of this section by the phin (Tursiops truncatus), Cuvier’s U.S. Navy, Department of Defense, beaked whale (Ziphiuscavirostris), Dall’s while engaged in the operation of no porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli), Dusky more than four SURTASS LFA sonar dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obscurus), systems conducting active sonar oper- dwarf sperm and pygmy sperm whales ations in areas specified in paragraph (Kogia simus and K.
    [Show full text]
  • Miyazaki, N. Growth and Reproduction of Stenella Coeruleoalba Off The
    GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION OF STENELLA COERULEOALBA OFF THE PACIFIC COAST OF JAPAN NOBUYUKI MIYAZAKI Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa ABSTRACT This study is based on data from about five thousand specimens of S. coeruleoalba. Mean length at birth is 100 cm. Mean lengths at the age of 1 year and 2 years are 166 cm and 180 cm, respectively. The species starts feed­ ing on solid food at the age of 0.25 year (or 135 cm). Mean weaning age is about 1.5 years (or 174 cm). Mean testis weights at the attainment of puberty and sexual maturity of males are 6.8 g and 15.5 g, respectively. Mean ages at the attainment of puberty and sexual maturity of males are 6. 7 years (or 210 cm) and 8.7 years (or 219 cm), respectively. Females attain puberty and sexual maturity on the average at 7.1 years (or 209 cm) and 8.8 years (or 216 cm), respectively. There are three mating seasons in a year, from Feb­ ruary to May, from July to September, and in December. Mating season may occur at an interval from 4 to 5 months. The overall sex ratio (male/female) is 1.14. Sex ratio changes with age, from near parity at birth, indicating higher mortality rates for males. INTRODUCTION The striped dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba are caught annually by the driving fishery or hand harpoons in the Pacific coast ofJapan (Ohsumi 1972, Miyazaki et al. 1974). According to Ohsumi (1972), Miyazaki et al. (1974), and Nishiwaki (1975), the striped dolphins caught in the Pacific coast of Japan are suggested to belong to one population.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverine and Marine Ecotypes of Sotalia Dolphins Are Different Species
    Marine Biology (2005) 148: 449–457 DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-0078-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE H.A. Cunha Æ V.M.F. da Silva Æ J. Lailson-Brito Jr M.C.O. Santos Æ P.A.C. Flores Æ A.R. Martin A.F. Azevedo Æ A.B.L. Fragoso Æ R.C. Zanelatto A.M. Sole´-Cava Riverine and marine ecotypes of Sotalia dolphins are different species Received: 24 December 2004 / Accepted: 14 June 2005 / Published online: 6 September 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract The current taxonomic status of Sotalia species cific status of S. fluviatilis ecotypes and their population is uncertain. The genus once comprised five species, but structure along the Brazilian coast. Nested-clade (NCA), in the twentieth century they were grouped into two phylogenetic analyses and analysis of molecular variance (riverine Sotalia fluviatilis and marine Sotalia guianensis) of control region sequences showed that marine and that later were further lumped into a single species riverine ecotypes form very divergent monophyletic (S. fluviatilis), with marine and riverine ecotypes. This groups (2.5% sequence divergence; 75% of total molec- uncertainty hampers the assessment of potential impacts ular variance found between them), which have been on populations and the design of effective conservation evolving independently since an old allopatric fragmen- measures. We used mitochondrial DNA control region tation event. This result is also corroborated by cyto- and cytochrome b sequence data to investigate the spe- chrome b sequence data, for which marine and riverine specimens are fixed for haplotypes that differ by 28 (out Communicated by J. P.
    [Show full text]