DOCSLIB.ORG

Uvalaw-2018-19-Annual-Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uvalaw-2018-19-Annual-Report.Pdf UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF 580 Massie Road Charlottesville, VA 22903-1738 www.law.virginia.edu/alumni UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018–2019 2018–2019 LSF AR Cover 2018-2019_cupola aerial.indd 1 10/9/19 10:06 AM UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW ANNUAL REPORT 2018–2019 Dean’s Message 3 Leadership Report 4 Statement of Accounts 6 Summary of Contributions & Expenditures 13 Dean’s Council Life Members 15 Associate Members 16 Highest Percentages of Participation: Regions and Classes 18 Largest Gifts: Regions and Classes 19 100% Participation Program 20 Regional Summary 22 Reunion Gifts 24 54th Giving Campaign 27 Annual Giving 2010–2019 28 Unrestricted Annual Giving 2010–2019 29 Alumni With Consecutive Years of Giving 29 Class Participation Percentages 30 Class Participation 32 Estate Gifts 99 Law Legacy Society 100 Non-Alumni Contributors Friends, Faculty, and Staff 103 Firms, Foundations, Corporations, and Organizations 107 Matching Gifts 110 In Memoriam 111 Gifts-in-Kind to the Arthur J. Morris Law Library 112 Law School Foundation Board of Trustees 113 Law School Alumni Council 114 Law School Foundation 115 2 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW DEAN’S MESSAGE FOR THE FOURTEENTH YEAR IN A ROW, MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF ALUMNI participated in our annual giving campaign. Almost 8,900 donors contributed $9.54 million to the Law School through annual giving alone. When we include bequests and special gifts, the Law School Foundation received $23.6 million this past fiscal year. These remark- able numbers reflect the strength of the Law School community and your affection for this special institution. Each gift reminds us that you value the role UVA Law has played in your life and allows us to provide a transformative education to students for years to come. Your support enables UVA Law students to learn from leading scholars and legal practitioners in classroom, clinical, and experiential settings. Your gifts sustain the unmatched student experience unique to the Law School—our wide variety of academic journals, student organizations, and activi- ties coupled with a devoted team of student services professionals who scour the country for the best students, support them throughout their years here, and send them off to exciting and fulfilling careers. We are not alone in seeing the fruits of your investments in this law school: we once again rank #1 for best professors and student quality of life in Princeton Review’s law school rankings. This year, as we continue to celebrate the Law School’s bicentennial and begin to commem- orate our centennial of coeducation, we see how deeply this institution has changed in terms of who it educates and how. We also see how much remains constant in terms of the Law School’s values of academic excellence, service to others, and the importance of community. This annual report highlights the amazing things your generosity makes possible and demon- strates our shared commitment to draw from our past and Honor the Future. Thank you for being part of this historic journey. With your continued support, we will make our third century the best yet. Risa L. Goluboff, Dean Arnold H. Lean Professor of Law Professor of History 2018–2019 ANNUAL REPORT 3 LEADERSHIP REPORT We are pleased to report that the 54th Annual Giving Campaign finished with 8,871 donors and a participation rate of 50.8%. Gift revenue totaled $23.6 million, of which $4.9 million was unrestricted. This is the fourteenth year in a row we have exceeded 50% participation. Our 50.8% participation rate is also (almost certainly) the highest among all law schools in the country, signaling to our peers, pro- spective students, and others that our alumni appreciate their education and believe in our stewardship of the Law School. Alumni from the classes of 1934 to 2021 contributed, with the classes of 1957 and 1974 surpassing 70% participation, and 36 classes meeting or exceeding 50% participation. In regional results, alumni in seven geographic regions finished with a participation rate of at least 60%, while Alabama’s Birmingham/Huntsville/Montgomery region topped the list with 67%. This year’s graduation gift cam- paign finished with 88% of the Class of 2019 making a pledge of future support. The following is a summary of the Foundation’s financial position and a report of the Alumni Association for the year ending June 30, 2019: LAW SCHOOL ENDOWMENT AND TOTAL ASSETS The Foundation holds more than $502 million in endowed and $24 million in non-endowed funds for the benefit of the Law School. In addition, the University holds $77 million and the Jefferson Scholars Foundation holds $4.7 million in endowed funds designated for the Law School. The combined value of these assets at June 30 exceeds $607 million. 2018–2019 CONTRIBUTIONS Gifts received by the Law School Foundation in fiscal year 2019, including annual giving, bequests, and special gifts, totaled $23.6 million. The 54th Annual Giving Campaign raised $9.54 million, of which $4.9 million was for unrestricted current use. ALUMNI ASSOCIATION Last year, Dean Risa Goluboff attended alumni events in Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlottesville, Dallas, Los Angeles, New York City, Northern Virginia, Palo Alto, Princeton, N.J., Richmond, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Additionally, the Law School Foundation and Alumni Association hosted receptions in Cary, N.C., Charleston, S.C., Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus, Miami, Nashville, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis. This fall, the Law School Foundation and Alumni Association will host alumni receptions in Boston, Charleston, W.V., Charlottesville, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Louisville, New York City, Norfolk, Philadelphia, Portland, Ore., Salt Lake City, Seattle, Washington, D.C., and Wilmington, Del. 4 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW The 2019 reunions were a great success, with more than 1,200 alumni and guests in attendance. The 2020 reunion weekend is scheduled for May 8–10 for the classes of 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015, and for the Lile Law Society (all alumni who have celebrated their 50th reunions). As always, all alumni are welcome to attend reunion weekend events regardless of their class year. This year’s Annual Report highlights how you give, why you give, and more: • Meet the recipient of the Thomas G. Slater, Jr. ’69 Scholarship, first-year Quinn Conrad. Conrad is a VMI graduate and U.S. Army officer and is the first Law student to receive the scholarship which honors Slater and his years on VMI’s board of visitors. • Catch up with another inaugural scholarship recipient: Kate Watlington ’11. Watlington was awarded the Law Alumnae Scholarship for her three years at UVA Law. Her career as a strategic advisor to project sponsors, investors, and financiers in the aspects of development and financing of power, oil, gas, and more, landed her in Charlotte, N.C., by way of Hong Kong and Singapore. • More than 1,130 alumni and friends made gifts on Giving to Hoos Day totaling over $328,750. Gifts came from alumni in 41 states and 6 countries. In honor of their 30th reunion, the Class of 1989 matched up to $200 of each gift made that day—providing over $107,000 in matching funds, to bring the total to $436,374! The Law School may have peers, but our community is unique. You make it special through your loyalty and affection, as well as your generosity. With our best wishes, F. Blair Wimbush ’80 Virginia Beach, Virginia Chair, Law School Foundation Board of Trustees Harry A. Shannon III ’82 Rockbridge Baths, Virginia President, Law School Alumni Association Martha A. Warthen ’02 Richmond, Virginia Chair, National Appeals Committee 2018–2019 ANNUAL REPORT 5 STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS 2018–2019 June 30, 2019 2018–2019 June 30, 2019 CONTRIBUTIONS MARKET VALUE CONTRIBUTIONS MARKET VALUE I. UNRESTRICTED FUNDS Janet Schwitzer Nolan ’89 and Non-Endowed Unrestricted Funds Paul B. Nolan ’89 $ 13,000 $ 13,517 James A. Pardo, Jr. ’79 and Current Use $ 3,980,076 $ 13,080,671 Mary C. Pardo 10,000 10,780 Ernest L. Folk III 1,000 3,750 Phipps Family 5,000 5,000 General Academic Programs – 4,496,150 Deirdre and Pat Quinn Family 10,000 11,016 Jeff Horner Memorial – 12,700 Donald Richberg – 354,016 Thatcher A. Stone 15,000 224,141 William H.D. Rossiter – 6,353,017 Rutherfurd Family 15,000 41,726 Endowed Unrestricted Funds JER – 117,526 J. Goodwin Bland ’87 - Michael Katovitz $ 20,000 $ 22,032 David P. Saunders ’07 and Heidi Saunders 5,000 5,141 Board of Trustees Leadership Fund – 41,208 Paul F. Sheridan ’96 and Arnold R. Boyd – 1,033,098 Rachel Ward Sheridan ’98 15,000 15,772 Andre W. Brewster ’48 Memorial – 296,648 Ashanté L. Smith ’02 16,000 16,950 E. Fontaine Broun – 1,636,568 J. Edward Smith – 512,268 David C. Burke ’93 178,652 283,727 H.C. Kinsey Spotswood – 139,461 Andrew D. Christian – 41,381 William L. Standish ’56 Memorial – 227,527 Class of 1929 – 353,192 Randall S. Strange – 210,311 Class of 1957 14,450 337,326 Armando A. Tabernilla ’84 10,000 11,016 Class of 1961 38,915 1,829,251 Trustees’ Academic Initiative – 507,100 Class of 1973 52,800 232,749 Albert R. Turnbull – 24,790 Lammot duPont Copeland – 7,498,190 Royall Victor Memorial – 55,454 Richard N. Crockett – 145,603 John William Waltz – 545,344 John S. Darden and Elise Bryant Darden 40,000 41,950 Warner Family – 412,073 Jeffrey B. Dierman ’69 and Leigh D. Williams – 913,715 Tamara S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A* ACE Study, See Student Body
    UVA CLIPPINGS FILE SUBJECT HEADINGS *A* Anderson, John F. Angress, Ruth K, A.C.E. Study, see Student body – Characteristics Anthropology and Sociology, Dept. of A.I.D.S. Archaeology Abbott, Charles Cortez Abbott, Francis Harris Archer, Vincent Architecture - U.Va. and environs, see also Local History File Abernathy, Thomas P. Architecture, School of Abraham, Henry J. Art Department Academic costume, procession, etc. Arts and Sciences - College Academical Village, see Residential Colleges Arts and Sciences - Graduate School Accreditation, see also Self Study Asbestos removal, see Waste Accuracy in Academia Adams (Henry) Papers Asian Studies Assembly of Professors Administration and administrative Astronomy Department committees (current) Athletics [including Intramurals] Administration - Chart - Academic Standards, scholarships, etc. Admissions and enrollment – to 1970\ - Baseball - 1970-1979 - Basketball - 1980- - Coaches - In-state vs. out-of-state - Fee - S.A.T. scores see also Athletes - Academic standards - Football - Funding Blacks - Admission and enrollment - Intercollegiate aspects Expansion - Soccer Women- Admission to UVA - Student perceptions Aerospace engineering, see Engineering, Aerospace see also names of coaches Affirmative Action, Office of Afro-American, Atomic energy, see Engineering, Nuclear see Blacks - Afro-American… Attinger, Ernst O. AIDS, see A.I.D.S. Authors Alcohol, see also Institute/ Substance Abuse Studies Alden, Harold Automobiles Aviation Alderman Library, see Library, Alderman Awards, Honors, Prizes - Directory Alderman, Edwin Anderson – Biography - Obituaries *B* - Speeches, papers, etc. Alderman Press Baccalaureate sermons, 1900-1953 Alford, Neill H., Jr. Bad Check Committee Alumni activities Baker, Houston A., Jr. Alumni Association – local chapter Bakhtiar, James A.H. Alumni – noteworthy Balch lectures and awards American Assn of University Professors, Balfour addition, see McIntire School of Commerce Virginia chapter Ballet Amphitheater| Balz, A.G.A.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Law School Reporter, Vol 11, No. 3, November 1995 New York Law School
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications Student Newspapers 11-1995 New York Law School Reporter, vol 11, no. 3, November 1995 New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/newspapers Recommended Citation New York Law School, "New York Law School Reporter, vol 11, no. 3, November 1995" (1995). Student Newspapers. 126. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/newspapers/126 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the NYLS Publications at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. 9\(ew 'Yorfc.£aw Sclwo[ '£,PO 'T'E, ¥01/UM'E 11, 9{_'ll9,{'1J'£1( 3 Media Law Project Enters The WEB By John Clark and most importantly, links to other Want to know what media events For thoseofyou who may be won­ informationand pages. Thisis what are going on in the city? Want to net­ dering what exactly a web page is, this makes the web so attractive to those work with media experts? Exchange E­ may give you a pretty good idea. The of us who learned to use a computer mail with Media Law Project members? World Wide Web can be thought of as by pointing at an icon with a Circulateyourresume?Doajobsearch? an extensive interconnected frame that 'mouse'. You simply click on the Locate a Torts outline? All these things sits on top of the enormous network of highlighted text (hypertext) and you will be accessible through the Media networks that we know as the Internet. are suddenly surfing to the next Law Project's new web page, available This frame is the most graphically page.
    [Show full text]
  • Springleaf Acquisition of Onemain: Creating the “New” Onemain Financial
    “New” OneMain Overview January 2016 Important Information This presentation contains summarized information concerning OneMain Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Company’s business, operations, financial performance and trends. No representation is made that the information in this presentation is complete. For additional financial, statistical and business related information, as well as information regarding business and segment trends, see the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Qs”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as well as the Company’s other reports filed with the SEC from time to time. Such reports are or will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (www.springleaf.com) and the SEC's website (www.sec.gov). Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains “forward‐looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact but instead represent only management’s current beliefs regarding future events. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward‐looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward‐looking statements that speak only as of the date they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward‐looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or the non-occurrence of anticipated events.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroline W. "Carrie" Stanton Partner Charlottesville, VA P: 434.951.5708 P: 804.420.6611 F: 434.817.0977 [email protected]
    Caroline W. "Carrie" Stanton Partner Charlottesville, VA P: 434.951.5708 P: 804.420.6611 F: 434.817.0977 [email protected] Carrie Stanton represents businesses in major corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions and capital raising as well as complex commercial contracts and corporate governance matters. She represents clients from a broad range of industries, including insurance, retail, manufacturing, technology, transportation, health care, engineering, startups and venture capitalists at various stages of a transaction. Carrie’s goals are to help her clients achieve their business objectives, identify opportunities and mitigate risks while providing excellent client service and promoting efficiency. In that vein, she is embedded in the firm’s effort to help in-house legal departments meet overflow needs at all stages of commercial contract negotiations. She often serves as the firm’s single point of contact for a client, becoming an integrated resource to provide insight on best practices and connect the client to the firm’s full range of legal services. Carrie is thorough and attentive, and she is enthusiastic in assisting clients in establishing and working toward their goals. She has been named to Virginia Lawyers Weekly's class of "Up & Coming Lawyers" (2019), in Virginia Super Lawyers Rising Stars (2013-present) for Business and Corporate Law and in The Best Lawyers in America© (2021). Carrie is a member of the Virginia Bar Association, Richmond Bar Association and Charlottesville-Albemarle Bar Association. She also serves on the American Bar Association Law Practice Division's Attorney Well-Being Committee. In the community, Carrie is a member of the executive board of directors for the United Way of Greater Charlottesville and was a member of the Leadership Charlottesville 2014 class.
    [Show full text]
  • • Making the Bar Review Fun
    • Making the Bar Review Fun Charles H. Whitebread ou want to take another bar modern bar review course. Before the 1970s, exam? Ask that question of any at- each state tested on its own law exclusively torney and watch their face blanch and had its own set of bar examiners. The with fear. In fact, I have one friend who prevalent type of bar review course prior Yclaims he could not sleep a wink for two to the 1970s was therefore local in its focus nights during the exam, wondering if he had and its ownership. Very often in these pre- answered the procedure essay correctly. The Multistate review courses, all subjects were bar exam is hard and dreary, but there’s no taught by a single person who specialized reason why the bar review, at least, can’t be in knowing the foibles and preferences of a little bit fun. local examiners. Substantive legal knowl- The bar examination in most jurisdic- edge took a back seat to insider knowledge tions is given twice a year: the last week about the local examiners. So, for example, of February and the last week of July. The the instructor might advise the students in exam usually is either two or three days long. the course that, in commercial paper, the ex- States vary but the usual pattern is one or aminer always used fact situations derived two days of essay and short answer ques- from recent Court of Appeals cases. So the tions and/or performance tests and one day student could review the past year’s five or – the Wednesday – for the national Multi- six commercial paper cases in the Court of state Bar Exam, made up of 300 multiple Appeals and feel sure they had seen the fact choice questions in six subjects: torts, con- patterns they would be asked to discuss on tracts, criminal law and procedure, property, the bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to the Editor: Terrorism — Why Turkey? “Santa Goes Sadistic”
    Virginia Law Weekly Friday, December 5, 2003Student Life 3 Letter to the Editor: Terrorism — Why Turkey? Faculty Quotes To the Editor: was simply a proxy. Nothing could pean Union membership. In short, this new type of terrorism. As far as J. Harrison: “What the court Over the past few weeks, we be further away from the truth. Turkey is the model of modernity Turkish secularism and democracy does here is open door number have had the opportunity to talk to Upon reflection, Turks and in- for 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide. are concerned, fear not. The Turk- three, and it’s saying, ‘behind door members of the Law School com- formed observers know the answer It is a model that proves there is no ish people have enjoyed both for too number three is a goat, so you go munity about the recent terrorist to the question “Why Turkey?”: The inherent conflict between Islam and long to let them go. But we need to jail.’ They are telling people attacks in Istanbul. All of our attacks target the functioning of a a Western-style democracy. It is help. Similar to September 11, the that the goat was always there, friends and family members are Western-style democracy in a pre- this model that the Bin Ladins of threat comes from a vast and highly and now they’re just opening the safe and well. Many thanks to ev- dominantly Muslim country. These the world want to see fail. organized global network of terror- door and showing it to us.” eryone who expressed their con- terrorists believe that by inflicting Turkey is where the East and ists.
    [Show full text]
  • Onemain Financial 2019 Investor Day
    OneMain Financial 2019 Investor Day November 20, 2019 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact but instead represent only management’s current beliefs regarding future events. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date on which they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or the non-occurrence of anticipated events, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning future plans, objectives, goals, projections, strategies, events or performance, including certain projected financial results for full-year 2019, and underlying assumptions and other statements related thereto. The only financial projections we are disclosing relate to the full-year 2019 period. Past performance is not necessarily indicative, or a guarantee, of future results, and there can be no assurance that our strategies will be successful or that we will realize any of our projected financial results for 2019 or other business goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Law Review Online
    COPYRIGHT © 2018 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ONLINE VOLUME 104 JANUARY 2018 1–7 FOREWORD Farah Peterson∗ On August 11 and 12, 2017, neo-Nazis and Klansmen came to Charlottesville to hold a rally meant to assert themselves as a force in American society. That event, and the President’s reaction to it, raised the disturbing possibility that for the first time in more than fifty years, white supremacy could be a matter of debate at the highest levels of American politics. This Foreword asks what legal scholarship has to contribute in times like these. It also introduces a partial answer: a group of student and faculty pieces analyzing some of the many difficult legal questions the rally raised. * * * T’S hard to know where to begin the story that culminated in the Imurder of Heather Heyer and the injury to our body politic. It could start in the early twentieth century, when black service in WWI and the rhetoric of that war gave black Americans new hope and inspired them to new militancy in demanding eQual citizenship.1 These hopes, short-lived, were “smashed” by a “reaction of violence that was probably unprecedented.”2 The last six months of 1919 saw twenty-five race riots in American cities, north and south, in which “mobs took over cities for days at a time, flogging, burning, shooting, and torturing at will.”3 It was also in 1919, that Paul Goodloe McIntire, a one-time UVA attendee and a great university benefactor, dedicated the first of the four bronze statues he had * Associate Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Kendrick CV 2021-4.2
    LESLIE CAROLYN KENDRICK University of Virginia School of Law Charlottesville, VA 22903 [email protected] EMPLOYMENT UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Charlottesville, Virginia Vice Dean, July 2017-present White Burkett Miller Professor of Law and Public Affairs, August 2020-present David H. Ibbeken ’71 Research Professor of Law Professor of Law, August 2018-present Albert Clark Tate, Jr., Research Professor of Law, August 2014-August 2017 Professor of Law, 2013-2020 Associate Professor of Law, 2008-2013 HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Cambridge, Massachusetts VisitinG Professor of Law, January 2017 UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW, Los Angeles, California VisitinG Professor of Law, January 2013-May 2013 THE HONORABLE DAVID H. SOUTER, Supreme Court of the United States Law Clerk, July 2007-July 2008 THE HONORABLE J. HARVIE WILKINSON, III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Law Clerk, June 2006-June 2007 EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Charlottesville, Virginia J.D., May 2006 Hardy Cross Dillard Scholarship (full merit scholarship) UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, Magdalen College, Oxford, UK D.Phil., English Literature, November 2003 M.Phil. with Distinction, English Literature, June 2000 Rhodes Scholarship (Kentucky & Magdalen 1998) UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, Chapel Hill, North Carolina B.A. with Highest Distinction, Classics and English, May 1998 Morehead Scholarship (full merit scholarship) Kendrick, 2 of 7 HONORS AND AWARDS Elected to American Law Institute (2017) University of Virginia All-University Teaching Award (2017) Carl McFarland Prize (for outstanding research by a junior member of UVA law faculty, 2014) Margaret G. Hyde Award (highest award given to member of graduating class at UVA Law, 2006) Virginia State Bar Family Law Book Award (2006) Judge John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Law Weekly, Friday, October 16, 1970
    2 VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1970 DICTA Cite as "Van Clief, VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY, DICTA, Vol. XXIII, No. 5 (1970)" 7 C/wr/ofCst,/le, / Y/flid,he 6dOrd IMue (Continued from Page 1) frdmurd/ foo/bd/ lln17ds suffered d humi/hhg defea o/ecl bernds of ihee nw innumerable problems of financial, mechanical, and person- MM// nr/llodhall/edmn1t fr TWELVE nel adjustment - even to the extent of closing their busi- CONSECUTIVE YEARS! nesses. Naturally, they practically always feel at first that the legislation is unnecessary, discriminatory and serves no AI /6/,cowevet- c&clrd kAue did I /lec'St VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY score 6houchdown - ike £cfi/egkly Iedm, real purpose. these diametrically opposed positions stem a num- MANAGING BOARD I ilk/cgIhe Firs a/ lP/es crer, /efi IMe From RICHARD A. MCKITTRICK Pdy/MO9 Ic/, dnod FOUR DOJANS tATER ber of arguments, both pro and con. Further, the affected Editor iaurd l/e SCOR(D A TO'CHDOWN!/ parties attempt to engage in delaying tactics, while the THOMAS M. BOYD WILLIAM P. BOSWELL Associate Edtor Managing Editor proponents will call for even more haste. The chief patron RODHAMT. DELK JR. X C6.Dick 1HOwrd, d5//MV~o of a bill of this type is immediately caught in a giant vise Business Manager emlye' es a Io,w Proessor c-i V lV. LameShoo/, Acs heem of rhetoric-some fact and some fiction, mostly opinion. EDITORIAL BOARD Se /EFcYkyoieV b9,RbC/s The legislative process is fortunately so constructed that all E ditor RICHARD A . M CKITTRICK .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citigroup - Quarterly Financial Data Supplement 1Q16
    CITIGROUP - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLEMENT 1Q16 Page Citigroup Consolidated Financial Summary 1 Consolidated Statement of Income 2 Consolidated Balance Sheet 3 Segment Detail Net Revenues 4 Income & Citicorp Regional Average Assets and ROA 5 Citicorp Income Statement and Balance Sheet Data 6 Global Consumer Banking (GCB) 7 - 8 North America 9 - 11 Latin America 12 - 13 Asia (1) 14 - 15 Institutional Clients Group (ICG) 16 Revenues by Business 17 Corporate / Other 18 Citi Holdings Income Statement and Balance Sheet Data 19 Consumer Key Indicators 20 - 21 Citigroup Supplemental Detail Average Balances and Interest Rates 22 Deposits 23 Loans Citicorp 24 Citi Holdings / Total Citigroup 25 Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios 90+ Days 26 30-89 Days 27 Allowance for Credit Losses Total Citigroup 28 Consumer and Corporate 29 - 30 Components of Provision for Loan Losses Citicorp 31 Citi Holdings / Total Citigroup 32 Non-Accrual Assets Total Citigroup 33 Citicorp 34 Citi Holdings 35 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures 36 (1) For reporting purposes, Asia GCB includes the results of operations of EMEA GCB for all periods presented. CITIGROUP -- FINANCIAL SUMMARY (In millions of dollars, except per share amounts, and as otherwise noted) 1Q16 Increase/ 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q (Decrease) from 2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 4Q15 1Q15 Total Revenues, Net of Interest Expense$ 19,736 $ 19,470 $ 18,692 $ 18,456 $ 17,555 (5%) (11%) Total Operating Expenses 10,884 10,928 10,669 11,134 10,523 (5%) (3%) Net Credit Losses (NCLs) 1,957 1,920 1,663 1,762
    [Show full text]
  • Iau American University Blr Business Law Rview
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS LAW REVIEW VOLUME6 • 2016 • ISSUE I ALEXANDRA MCLEOD Editor-in-Chief GABRIEL RASKAS CATRIONA COPPLER Managing Editor Executive Editor TIANA CHERRY Associate ManagingEditor BENJAMIN MCCARTY GINA COLARUSSO PATRICK KAIN Senior Note & Comment Senior Articles Editor JOANNA SCLEIDOROVICH Business & Marketing Editor Editors STEPHANIE COSTA Symposium Editor Articles Editors Note & Comment Editors KRISTINE LITTLE ALEXANDRA CAIN CHAUNA PERVIS MARJORIE CASTILLO CHELSEA RECKELL MEGAN DOYLE NINA RODRIGUEZ KIKi MCARTHUR Senior Staff JOSHUA ADRIAN PAOLA HENRY SUZANNE RIOPEL RALPH BERNARD STEPHANIE LIAO SARA SASS PETER BROSTOWIN SHAWN MARCUM JULIE SHURSKY JULIANA PEREZ CALLE BETTY MCNEIL MAEGEN SINCLEAIR NICHOLAS ENNS DAVID NAJERA BRIAN TAN SANDRA FADEL MONISHA RAO WILLIAM WARMKE ALEXANDRA FOSTER KALLI WELLS BRIAN GAUTHIER EMILY WOLFFORD Junior Staff NANA AMOO ZACHARY JOHNSTON HILARY ROSENTHAL STEFANIE ANDREWS JAMES KIM NATHAN ROY JOSHUA ARONS INDIA MCGEE BRIANNA SCHACTER CONOR ARPEY MORGAN McKINLAY DANIEL PATRICK SHAFFER JOHN COSCULLUELA VANESSA MICHAUD RONALDA SMITH NATALIE CUADROS JOSHUA MORRIS DALISHA STURDIVANT ELI DANIELS ELIZABETH NWABUEZE LUKE TROMPETER JAMES DUFFY MOFETOLUWA OBADINA STEPHANIE VILELLA ALYSSA DUNBAR JACOB PEEPLES SETH WEINTRAUB VICTORIA GARCIA PRITIKA RAMESH COLIN WOOD CARL GAUL SAREESH RAWAT CHRIS WHITE Law Review Coordinator SHARON E. WOLFE C -~ - N IAU AMERICAN UNIVERSITY BLR BUSINESS LAW RVIEW The AMERICAN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS LAW REVIEW is published three times a year by students of the Washington College of Law, American University, 4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW, Suite CT08 Washington, D.C. 20016. Manuscripts should be sent to the Executive Editor at the above listed address or electronically at [email protected]. The opinions expressed in articles herein are those of the signed authors and do not reflect the views of the Washington College of Law or the American University Business Law Review.
    [Show full text]