A Guide to Life on Sandy Shores Between Colwyn Bay and Fleetwood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Guide to Life on Sandy Shores Between Colwyn Bay and Fleetwood 16 1 Making a record and then Sending your record to where they will be useful for conservation etc. Some of the recording groups use their own record sheets to assist recorders. A version is available from www.rECOrd-lrc.co.uk The following information is required for every recording trip Liverpool Bay Marine Recording Partnership Your name Date of the observation Where it was found e.g. Crosby Beach. List of the species you saw A guide to Life on Sandy Shores The following information is very useful, but not essential between A note if any species was particularly common Colwyn Bay and Fleetwood A note if any species were observed alive, or, recently dead, e.g. shells with body parts still inside. written by Ian Wallace, Map grid references World Museum Liverpool The records should be sent to your recording group guide concept Kathryn Turner, Organiser, if you have one, or to the appropriate Fylde Coast Marine Life Project Local Record Centre — which is where all the recording groups send their collated records. Images mainly from World Museum Liverpool, and Kathryn Turner North Wales to Cofnod see www.cofnod.org.uk Wirral to rECOrd [email protected] Liverpool to Southport to Merseyside Biobank see www.merseysidebiobank.org.uk Fylde to LERN see http://www.lancspartners.org/lern/ 2 15 This booklet aims to enable the identification of the Not in this guide? common larger marine life found on the beaches between Colwyn Bay in the south and Fleetwood in the north. If you think you have found something not illustrated in this guide, or you want you identifications checked then It is aimed at groups and individuals who are taking part World Museum is keen to help you. in biological recording. Send a photograph by email or (post) to Additional notes to assist with the identification of difficult species and rarer species have been prepared and are available on-line [email protected] from the Liverpool Bay Marine Recording Partnership pages, one of the hosted groups on the rECOrd web site. If it is something that will not rot, such as a shell, we www.record-lrc.co.uk would encourage you to keep examples as voucher specimens and get them to the Natural History Centre, Limitations to use World Museum, William Brown Street, Liverpool, who will This booklet does not include dead fish, birds or mammals be able to check your identifications before returning your If used away from the area of coverage you are quite likely to encounter specimens, but phone first 0151 207 0001 to check species that are not in this guide. someone who knows about shells will be on duty in the The booklet is for sandy shores it does not cover species found museum to receive your finds. exclusively on hard rocks, breakwaters, sea walls, marine lakes and in rock pools. Health and Safety The greatest danger is being cut off by a rising tide so you are strongly recom- mended to only investigate on a falling tide. There are quick sands and also sand-covered soft mud, so if you start sinking in — retreat. Three species of Jellyfish, (Lion’s Mane, rare Blue Lion’s Mane and internal parts of the Barrel), and the Weever Fish can give painful stings and they should not be handled. Piles of marine debris may conceal sharp man- made objects. Dead and dying life is common and presents a food-poisoning risk so clean hands with soap and water or antiseptic wipes before touching the mouth or food. Before starting, cover cuts and abrasions with ‘Elastoplast’. Ian Wallace World Museum Liverpool All local sewage is treated so sewage-related items should be rare but note that William Brown Street, LIVERPOOL dog droppings are present on many beaches. [email protected] 14 3 Equipment A Guide to Common Shells Carrier bags, Garden trowel, Kitchen sieve, Seaside shrimping net or aquarium found cast up on beaches between equivalent, Cat-litter tray. (Hand lens good to see more of your finds) Smaller Colwyn Bay and Fleetwood bags are useful to build up a collection of durable finds. Note - Colour may vary from that shown and they may be blackened Shells can be collected into any suitable water-proof bag e.g. Supermarket - The size given is the largest that species normally grows Carriers * indicates there are rarer species that also look a bit like this (These are covered by additional notes available from www.record-lrc.co.uk) Centimetres Animals that are alive in the sand and in water Animals that are buried can be revealed by digging up a trowel-full of sand plac- 1 ing it into the kitchen sieve then washing the sand through the sieve by placing it up to its rim, but not above, in water and moving it from side to side. Note that 2 this does not usually work for stiff mud. Any net will catch animals that cannot pass through its mesh. Fine nets clog, but 3 Common Whelk Red Whelk Dog Whelk Buccinum undatum coarse nets let too much escape. A mesh of about 2 mm is good. Neptunea antiqua Nucella lapillus Up to 9 cms Up to 10 cms Up to 3.5 cms 4 (see also page 6) (see also page 6) To see your captures easily, place the contents of your net or sieve into a little water in the cat litter tray. The tray is also useful to lay out other beach finds for examination. 5 Best places to look for buried life 6 Life can be sparse in the dryer sands of the upper shore. Wet sand, for example at the edge of channels can be good but NB such areas can also be quick 7 Sting Winkle Common Winkle * Flat Winkle sands. Ocenebra erinacea Littorina littorea Littorina obtusata 8 Up to 4 cms Up to 2.5 cms Up to 1.5 cms Keeping your animals alive 9 It can be interesting to watch the animals you have dug up re-bury. This can be done on the beach or by putting them into a bowl filed with sand and water. However, release them afterwards as sandy-shore life is very difficult to keep in 10 aquaria. ..... and finally Tower Shell Wentletrap Grey Top Shell (group) Turritella communis Epitonium clathrus Gibbula cineraria You will encounter lots of black sand under the surface, and shells that are bur- Up to 5 cms Up to 3.5 cms Up to 1.5 cms ied also go black. The black sand may smell of bad eggs or have a metallic tang. This is not pollution, but the result of natural decay processes in the sand. Necklace Shell * Common Pelican’s Foot Laver Spire Shells (group) * Up to 3.5 cms Aporrhais pespelicani Hydrobia ulvae Up to 5 cms Up to 0.5 cms 4 13 Centimetres Worms many kinds are found buried, most are small and difficult to iden- 1 tify these are some of the larger or more obvious 2 3 Common Limpet Barrel Shell Icelandic Cyprine Patella vulgata Acteon tornatilis Arctica islandica Up to 4 cms Up to 1.5 cms Up to 8 cms 4 Filip Nuyttens marinespecies.org Front end Sand Mason (front end) Estuary Ragworm 5 Lugworm Arenicola marina Lanice conchilega Hediste diversicolor Up to 25 cms Up to 30 cms Up to 25 cms Very common in mud and muddy 6 sand Sand Gaper Otter Shell Blunt Gaper 7 Mya arenaria Lutraria lutraria Mya truncata Up to 8 cms Up to 10 cms Up to 6cms (see also page 6 (see also page 6) 8 Front end 9 Fromt end Front end Scoloplos armiger Pod Razor * Curved Razor * Cat Worms Spionid Worm (and similar) Up to 15 cms 10 Up to 15 cms Up to 15 cms Nephtys species several species Flesh-coloured worm with Up to 20 cms Small thin worms up to 5 cms prominent bristly lobes on Bean Razor Pharus legumen Up to 8 cms Very common in clean sand with two waving tentacles each segment, but no eyes Front end Front end Front end Queen Scallop * Aequipecten opercularis Variegated Scallop Scolelepis squamata Red Threads Worm Capitella capitata Up to 6 cms Chlamys varia Oval Piddock Up to 8 cms Cirratulus cirratus Up to 10 cms (see also page 6) Bluish green body and 2 Looks a bit like a small earth- Up to 5 cms Zirfaea crispata Up to 12 cms waving tentacles worm (see also page 6) Up to 7 cms Red threads writhe Worm Tubes a few millimetres thick Tubes made from sand grains are common in sieved sand samples. Tubes of coarse grains ,with a crown will be from young Sand Masons or a worm called Owenia. Common Oyster Foreign Oysters White Piddock * Ostrea edulis Up to 10 cms Barnea candida Tubes of very fine grains will be from Spionid Up to 10 cms. Up to 6 cms Worms or another worm called Magelona. 12 5 Centimetres 1 2 Brown Shrimp Prawn 3 Common Mussel Striped Venus Faroe Sunset Shell * Crangon crangon (various species) Mytilus edulis Chamelea gallina Gari fervensis Up to 5 cms Up to 3 cms Up to 4 cms 4 5 6 7 Pullet Carpet Shell * Common Cockle Prickly Cockle Mysid (various species) Eurydice pulchra Cumacean Venerupis senengalensis Cerastoderma edule Acanthocardia echinata NB 8 mms maximum size (various species) Up to 5.5 cms Up to 4 cms Up to 6 cms (fast swimmer and burrower) 1 cm maximum size 8 9 Idotea Up to 2 cms 10 Lives on drifted seaweed Banded Wedge Shell Artemis Shell Peppery Furrow Shell a Sand Hopper a Sand Hopper Sea Slater Donax vittatus Dosinia species Scrobicularia plana Up to 1.5 cms Up to 2.5 cms Ligia oceanica Up to 3 cms Up to 5 cms Up to 4.5 cms Talitrus saltator Orchestia gammarellus Up to 3 cms Under debris near rocks and Hoppers live under debris stranded at the top sea walls of the beach Rayed Trough Shell * Mactra stultorum Thick Trough Shell * Cut Trough Shell * front end Up to 5 cms Spisula solida Spisula subtruncata (less common white form on right) Up to 4 cms Up to 2.5 cms Haustorius arenarius Bathyporeia pelagica (see also page 6) Up to 1 cm Up to 5 mms Eyelesss fast burrower in Fast burrower in sand clean sand Corophium These and Haustorius and Up to 1 cm Bathyporeia, the Hoppers and Thin Tellin * Abundant in ‘u’-shaped Corophium are all members of a Baltic Tellin Tellina tenuis burrows in mud and group of Crustacea called Macoma balthica muddy sand Ampipods Up to 2 cms Up to 2 cms White Furrow Shell * (group) Abra alba Amphipods Up to 1.5 cms Extra Notes 6 11 Common Winkles smaller than 1.5 cms might A Guide to Animals living in pools and be Rough Winkles channels on beaches, Common Necklace Shells smaller than 3 cms and buried in the sand and mud might be Alder’s Necklace Shell between Colwyn Bay and Fleetwood At the edge of salt marshes Note - All the species shown on previous pages may become dumpy Laver Spire Shells stranded in pools and channels.
Recommended publications
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator and Scavenger Aggregation to Discarded By-Catch from Dredge Fisheries: Importance of Damage Level
    Journal of Sea Research 51 (2004) 69–76 www.elsevier.com/locate/seares Short Communication Predator and scavenger aggregation to discarded by-catch from dredge fisheries: importance of damage level S.R. Jenkinsa,b,*, C. Mullena, A.R. Branda a Port Erin Marine Laboratory (University of Liverpool), Port Erin, Isle of Man, British Isles, IM9 6JA, UK b Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK Received 23 October 2002; accepted 22 May 2003 Abstract Predator and scavenger aggregation to simulated discards from a scallop dredge fishery was investigated in the north Irish Sea using an in situ underwater video to determine differences in the response to varying levels of discard damage. The rate and magnitude of scavenger and predator aggregation was assessed using three different types of bait, undamaged, lightly damaged and highly damaged individuals of the great scallop Pecten maximus. In each treatment scallops were agitated for 40 minutes in seawater to simulate the dredging process, then subjected to the appropriate damage level before being tethered loosely in front of the video camera. The density of predators and scavengers at undamaged scallops was low and equivalent to recorded periods with no bait. Aggregation of a range of predators and scavengers occurred at damaged bait. During the 24 hour period following baiting there was a trend of increasing magnitude of predator abundance with increasing damage level. However, badly damaged scallops were eaten quickly and lightly damaged scallops attracted a higher overall magnitude of predator abundance over a longer 4 day period. Large scale temporal variability in predator aggregation to simulated discarded biota was examined by comparison of results with those of a previous study, at the same site, 4 years previously.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Hydraulic Blade Dredging on a Benthic Megafaunal Community in the Clyde Sea Area, Scotland
    Journal of Sea Research 50 (2003) 45–56 www.elsevier.com/locate/seares The impact of hydraulic blade dredging on a benthic megafaunal community in the Clyde Sea area, Scotland C. Hauton*, R.J.A. Atkinson, P.G. Moore University Marine Biological Station Millport (UMBSM), Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 0EG, UK Received 4 December 2002; accepted 13 February 2003 Abstract A study was made of the impacts on a benthic megafaunal community of a hydraulic blade dredge fishing for razor clams Ensis spp. within the Clyde Sea area. Damage caused to the target species and the discard collected by the dredge as well as the fauna dislodged by the dredge but left exposed at the surface of the seabed was quantified. The dredge contents and the dislodged fauna were dominated by the burrowing heart urchin Echinocardium cordatum, approximately 60–70% of which survived the fishing process intact. The next most dominant species, the target razor clam species Ensis siliqua and E. arcuatus as well as the common otter shell Lutraria lutraria, did not survive the fishing process as well as E. cordatum, with between 20 and 100% of individuals suffering severe damage in any one dredge haul. Additional experiments were conducted to quantify the reburial capacity of dredged fauna that was returned to the seabed as discard. Approximately 85% of razor clams retained the ability to rapidly rebury into both undredged and dredged sand, as did the majority of those heart urchins Echinocardium cordatum which did not suffer aerial exposure. Individual E. cordatum which were brought to surface in the dredge collecting cage were unable to successfully rebury within three hours of being returned to the seabed.
    [Show full text]
  • MOLLUSCS Species Names – for Consultation 1
    MOLLUSCS species names – for consultation English name ‘Standard’ Gaelic name Gen Scientific name Notes Neologisms in italics der MOLLUSC moileasg m MOLLUSCS moileasgan SEASHELL slige mhara f SEASHELLS sligean mara SHELLFISH (singular) maorach m SHELLFISH (plural) maoraich UNIVALVE SHELLFISH aon-mhogalach m (singular) UNIVALVE SHELLFISH aon-mhogalaich (plural) BIVALVE SHELLFISH dà-mhogalach m (singular) BIVALVE SHELLFISH dà-mhogalaich (plural) LIMPET (general) bàirneach f LIMPETS bàirnich common limpet bàirneach chumanta f Patella vulgata ‘common limpet’ slit limpet bàirneach eagach f Emarginula fissura ‘notched limpet’ keyhole limpet bàirneach thollta f Diodora graeca ‘holed limpet’ china limpet bàirneach dhromanach f Patella ulyssiponensis ‘ridged limpet’ blue-rayed limpet copan Moire m Patella pellucida ‘The Virgin Mary’s cup’ tortoiseshell limpet bàirneach riabhach f Testudinalia ‘brindled limpet’ testudinalis white tortoiseshell bàirneach bhàn f Tectura virginea ‘fair limpet’ limpet TOP SHELL brùiteag f TOP SHELLS brùiteagan f painted top brùiteag dhotamain f Calliostoma ‘spinning top shell’ zizyphinum turban top brùiteag thurbain f Gibbula magus ‘turban top shell’ grey top brùiteag liath f Gibbula cineraria ‘grey top shell’ flat top brùiteag thollta f Gibbula umbilicalis ‘holed top shell’ pheasant shell slige easaig f Tricolia pullus ‘pheasant shell’ WINKLE (general) faochag f WINKLES faochagan f banded chink shell faochag chlaiseach bhannach f Lacuna vincta ‘banded grooved winkle’ common winkle faochag chumanta f Littorina littorea ‘common winkle’ rough winkle (group) faochag gharbh f Littorina spp. ‘rough winkle’ small winkle faochag bheag f Melarhaphe neritoides ‘small winkle’ flat winkle (2 species) faochag rèidh f Littorina mariae & L. ‘flat winkle’ 1 MOLLUSCS species names – for consultation littoralis mudsnail (group) seilcheag làthaich f Fam.
    [Show full text]
  • Clams” Fauna Along French Coasts
    Asian Journal of Research in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 1(1): 1-12, 2018; Article no.AJRAVS.39207 The Regulation of Interspecific Variations of Shell Shape in Bivalves: An Illustration with the Common “Clams” Fauna along French Coasts Jean Béguinot1* 1Biogéosciences, UMR 6282, CNRS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 6, Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France. Author’s contribution The sole author designed, analyzed, interpreted and prepared the manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/AJRAVS/2018/39207 Editor(s): (1) Andras Fodor, Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio State University, USA. Reviewers: (1) Mahmoud Abdelhamid Dawood, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt. (2) Mbadu Zebe Victorine, Democratic Republic of Congo. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/23116 Received 24th November 2017 th Original Research Article Accepted 6 February 2018 Published 10th February 2018 ABSTRACT I report an unexpected negative covariance occurring between two major parameters governing shell growth in marine bivalves, especially within the order Veneroida. This relationship is highlighted, here, considering a set of forty, rather common species of clams collected from French coasts. Interestingly, this negative covariance has two (geometrically related) consequences on the pattern of variation of shell shape at the inter-specific level: (i) An extended range of variation of shell elongation ‘E’ is made compatible with. (ii) A severely restricted range of variation of the ventral convexity ‘K’ of the shell contour. I suggest that: (i) The extended range of interspecific variation of the shell elongation ‘E’ results from a trend towards larger differentiation between species according to this functionally important parameter E, while, in contrast, (ii) The strongly restricted range of variation of the ventral convexity ‘K’ of the shell contour might arguably result from a common need for improved shell resistance, face to mechanical solicitations from the environment, either biotic or abiotic.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Study Group on Electrical Trawling 2011
    ICES SGELECTRA REPORT 2011 SCICOM STEERING GROUP ON ECOSYSTEM SURVEYS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ICES CM 2011/SSGESST:09 REF. SCICOM Report of the Study Group on Electrical Trawling (SGELECTRA) 7-8 May 2011 Reykjavik, Iceland International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2011. Report of the Study Group on Electrical Trawling (SGELECTRA), 7-8 May 2011, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2011/SSGESST:09. 93 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2011 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES SGELECTRA REPORT 2011 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 3 2 Confidentiality issue ..................................................................................................... 3 3 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 3 4 Review of earlier
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ciliary Mechanisms and Interrelationships of Lamellibranchs
    On the Ciliary Mechanisms and Interrelationships of Lamellibranchs. PAET IV: Cuticular Fusion, with special reference to the Fourth Aperture in certain Lamelli- branchs. By Daphne Atkins, B.Sc. Marine Biological Laboratory, Plymouth. With 11 Text-figures. CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION 423 HISTOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF THE JUNCTION .... 424 CUTICULAK FUSION IN RELATION TO THE FOURTH APERTURE IN CERTAIN LAMELLIBRANCHS ....... 436 Origin of the Fourth Aperture ....... 442 SUMMARY ........... 444 INTBODUCTION. A PECULIAR form of fusion, involving the cuticle only, has been found in a number of Lamellibranchs, but has been chiefly studied in the Solenidae. The positions so far discovered in which this type of fusion occurs are between the dorsal edges of the ascending lamellae of the outer demibranchs and the mantle or the visceral mass in Solen marginatus Montagu (=vagina), Ensis siliqua (L.), Ensis arcuatus (Jeffreys), Cultellus pellucidus (Pennant), Solecurtus scopula (Turton) (=candidus), Lutraria lutraria (L.) (=elliptica), and Tellina tenuis da Costa; between the dorsal edges of the ascending lamellae of the two inner demibranchs in Barnea parva (Pennant); and between the mantle lobes in the region between the pedal and fourth apertures in Ensis siliqua, Ensis arcuatus, and Cultellus pellucidus. 424 D. ATKINS HlSTOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF THE JUNCTION. Material was fixed in Bouin-Duboscq's fluid with the following formula: saturated picric acid in 90 per cent, alcohol, 2 parts; saturated corrosive sublimate (water), 3 parts; 40 per cent, formalin, 1 part; glacial acetic acid, 2 parts. The stains used were Heidenhain's iron haematoxylin counterstained with acid m.f TEXT-FIG. 1 A. Transverse section showing the method of junction of the mantle lobes in the mid-ventral region between the pedal and fourth apertures.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Conservation Status of Marine Habitats: Thoughts from a Sandflat on the Isles of Scilly
    MURDOCH RESEARCH REPOSITORY This is the author’s final version of the work, as accepted for publication following peer review but without the publisher’s layout or pagination. The definitive version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2014.07.013 Warwick, R.M. and Somerfield, P.J. (2014) Assessing the conservation status of marine habitats: thoughts from a sandflat on the Isles of Scilly. Journal of Sea Research, 98. pp. 109-119. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/23345/ Copyright: © 2014 Elsevier B.V. It is posted here for your personal use. No further distribution is permitted. ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Assessing the conservation status of marine habitats: Thoughts from a sandflat on the Isles of Scilly R.M. Warwick, P.J. Somerfield PII: S1385-1101(14)00136-1 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2014.07.013 Reference: SEARES 1277 To appear in: Journal of Sea Research Received date: 21 February 2014 Revised date: 14 July 2014 Accepted date: 20 July 2014 Please cite this article as: Warwick, R.M., Somerfield, P.J., Assessing the conservation status of marine habitats: Thoughts from a sandflat on the Isles of Scilly, Journal of Sea Research (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2014.07.013 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
    [Show full text]
  • List of All Nominal Recent Species Belonging to the Superfamily Mactroidea Distributed in American Waters
    Appendix A: List of All Nominal Recent Species Belonging to the Superfamily Mactroidea Distributed in American Waters Valid species (in the current combination) Synonym Examined type material Harvella elegans NHMUK 20190673, two syntypes (G.B. Sowerby I, 1825) Harvella pacifica ANSP 51308, syntype Conrad, 1867 Mactra estrellana PRI 21265, holotype Olsson, 1922 M. (Harvella) PRI 2354, holotype sanctiblasii Maury, 1925 Raeta maxima Li, AMNH 268093, lectotype; AMNH 268093a, 1930 paralectotype Harvella elegans PRI 2252, holotype tucilla Olsson, 1932 Mactrellona alata ZMUC-BIV, holotype, articulated specimen; (Spengler, 1802) ZMUC-BIV, paratype, one complete specimen Mactra laevigata ZMUC-BIV 1036, holotype Schumacher, 1817 Mactra carinata MNHN-IM-2000-7038, syntypes Lamarck, 1818 Mactrellona Types not found, based on the figure of the concentrica (Bory de “Tableau of Encyclopedique Methodique…” Saint Vincent, (pl. 251, Fig. 2a, b, pl. 252, Fig. 2c) published in 1827, in Bruguière 1797 without a nomenclatorial act et al. 1791–1827) Mactrellona clisia USNM 271481, holotype (Dall, 1915) Mactrellona exoleta NHMUK 196327, syntype, one complete (Gray, 1837) specimen © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 103 J. H. Signorelli, The Superfamily Mactroidea (Mollusca:Bivalvia) in American Waters, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29097-9 104 Appendix A: List of All Nominal Recent Species Belonging to the Superfamily… Valid species (in the current combination) Synonym Examined type material Lutraria ventricosa MCZ 169451, holotype; MCZ 169452, paratype;
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biological Research at Lundy
    Irving, RA, Schofield, AJ and Webster, CJ. Island Studies (1997). Bideford: Lundy Field Society Marine Biological Research at Lundy summarised in Tregelles ( 193 7) and are incorporated into the fljracombejauna andjlora (Tregelles, Palmer & Brokenshire 1946) and the Flora of Devon (Anonymous Keith Hiscock 1952). The first systematic studies of marine ecology at Lundy were undertaken by Professor L.A. Harvey and Mrs C.C. Harvey together with students of Exeter Introduction University in the late 1940s and early 1950s The earliest recorded marine biological studies near to (Anonymous 1949, Harvey 1951, Harvey 1952). These Lundy are noted in the work of Forbes (1851) who took studies again emphasised the richness of the slate dredge samples off the east coast of the island in 1848. shores especially when compared to the relatively The first descriptions of the seashore wildlife on Lundy impoverished fauna on the granite shores. A later are those published in 1853 by the foremost Victorian study (Hawkins & Hiscock 1983) suggested that marine naturalist and writer, P.H. Gosse, in the Home impoverishment in intertidal mollusc species was Friend (reproduced later in Gosse 1865). However, his due to the isolation of Lundy from mainland sources of descriptions are unenthusiastic, reveal nothing unusu­ larvae. al and draw attention to the very few species found on When marine biologists started to use diving the granite shores. There are further brief references to equipment to explore underwater around Lundy at Lundy in the literature of other Victorian naturalists. the end of the 1960s, they discovered rich and diverse Tugwell ( 1856) found the shores rich collecting communities and many rare species leading to a wide grounds and cites the success of a collecting party who range of studies being undertaken, both underwater (with the help of "an able-bodied man with a crowbar") and on the shore, in the 1970s and early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Actiniaria, Actiniidae)
    BASTERIA, 50: 87-92, 1986 The Queen Scallop, Chlamys opercularis (L., 1758) (Bivalvia, Pectinidae), as a food item of the Urticina sea anemone eques (Gosse, 1860) (Actiniaria, Actiniidae) J.C. den Hartog Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands detailed is available about the food of but do Scantly knowledge sea anemones, we know that intertidal many species, especially forms, are opportunistic feeders on sizeable prey, such as other Coelenterata, Crustacea, Echinodermata and Mollusca, notably gastropods. of the Urticina Representatives genus Ehrenberg, 1834 ( = Tealia Gosse, 1858) oc- both and in moderate well-known curring intertidally depths, are as large prey predators (Slinn, 1961; Den Hartog, 1963; Sebens & Laakso, 1977; Shimek, 1981; Thomas, 1981). Slinn (loc. cit.) reported an incidental record of two actinians brought in by Port Erin scallop fishermen, identifiedas Tealiafelina (L., 1761), but more likely Urticina each of which had individual of to represent eques (Gosse, 1860), ingested an the sea urchin Echinus esculentus L., 1758. Den Hartog (loc. cit.: 77-78) referring to the Dutch coast reported the starfish Asterias rubens L., 1758, to be the main food item of the shore-form of Urticinafelina (L., 1761) [often referred to in the older literature as Tealia coriacea (Cuvier) or the var. coriacea; cf. Stephenson, 1935], including specimens considerably exceeding the basal diameterof the anemones. Second-common was the crab Carcinus width 30 further is maenas (L. 1758) (carapax up to mm) and noteworthy of of the a record a specimen rather rigid scyphozoan Rhizostoma octopus (L., 1788) [as R. pulmo (Macri, 1778)] with an umbrella almost twice the basal diameter of its swallower.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Reproductive Biology of the Sea Star Astropecten Aranciacus
    Baeta et al. Helgol Mar Res _#####################_ DOI 10.1186/s10152-016-0453-z Helgoland Marine Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Growth and reproductive biology of the sea star Astropecten aranciacus (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) on the continental shelf of the Catalan Sea (northwestern Mediterranean) Marc Baeta1,2*, Eve Galimany1,3 and Montserrat Ramón1,3 Abstract The growth and reproductive biology of the sea star Astropecten aranciacus was investigated on the continental shelf of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Sea stars were captured monthly in two bathymetric ranges (5–30 and 50–150 m) between November 2009 and October 2012. Bathymetric segregation by size in A. aranciacus was detected: small individuals inhabit shallow areas (5–30 m), while large individuals inhabit deeper areas of the conti‑ nental shelf (50–150 m). Recruitment was recorded twice nearshore but no recruitment was detected offshore during the whole study period. Three cohorts were identified in each bathymetric range and growth rates were estimated. A. aranciacus population exhibited a seasonal growth pattern, being higher from June to October in the nearshore cohorts and from February to October in the offshore ones. Histology and organ indices revealed that spawning likely started in March, coinciding with the spring phytoplankton bloom and the increase in sea water temperature, and extended until June–July. Ratio between males and females was approximately 1:1 throughout the year and in both bathymetrical ranges. The size at first maturity (R50 %) was estimated to be R 112 mm. A. aranciacus did not show an inverse relationship between gonad index and pyloric caeca index. = Keywords: Asteroidea, Starfish, Mediterranean and echinoderm Background Astropecten (Fam.
    [Show full text]