DOCSLIB.ORG

Marcelo Hilario Del Pilar Father of True Filipino Freemasonry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marcelo Hilario Del Pilar Father of True Filipino Freemasonry Marcelo Hilario del Pilar Father of True Filipino Freemasonry Marcelo H. del Pilar started his active nationalistic crusade after obtaining his license in jurisprudence in 1880. To reach the masses, he published Diariong Tagalog in 1882. In 1886, Logia Solidaridad (Solidarity Lodge) was founded in Barcelona by two Filipinos, Rafael del Pan and Ricardo Ayllon; three Cubans, a Puerto Rican and two peninsular Spaniards; joined later by two other Filipinos, Julio Llorente and Evaristo Aguirre. Despite its dissolution in 1887, this move established Filipino contacts with Freemasonry under Miguel Morayta. In 1888, del Pilar’s participation as the alleged author of the anti-friar petition during a mass demonstration and, as a lawyer, his successful defence of its leaders made him a target of persecution. In 1889, he sailed for Spain as delegate of the Comite de Propaganda where, along with other Filipino expatriates, he continued his fight for reforms. He succeeded Graciano Lopez-Jaena as editor of the propaganda newspaper La Solidaridad, where he used the pen name 'Plaridel' - a play on his surname - to avoid identification and arrest. del Pilar was made a Freemason in 1889 and became a close friend of Miguel Morayta a professor at the Universidad Central de Madrid, president of the Asociacion Hispano- Filipino and Grand Master of Masons of the Gran Oriente Español. In the same year, Logia Revolucion (Revolution Lodge), the first predominantly Filipino lodge was founded in Barcelona with Graciano Lopez Jaena as Worshipful Master, Mariano Ponce as Secretary and members Marcelo del Pilar, Jose Ma. Panganiban, and two Cubans; chartered by the Gran Oriente Español on 01 April 1889. The lodge was dissolved when del Pilar moved the propaganda campaign to Madrid. Logia Solidaridad No. 53 was revived in Madrid under its old charter on 15 May 1890 with Julio Llorente as Worshipful Master and Marcelo del Pilar as Senior Warden. Del Pilar succeeded Llorente as Worshipful Master in January 1891. This lodge drew together all Filipino Masons and became a forum of nationalistic ideas. Marcelo del Pilar conceived of a plan to organise Masonic lodges in the Philippines and was responsible for obtaining authority from Miguel Morayta to establish Filipino lodges in the country. Pedro Serrano Laktaw returned to Manila for the purpose. The first Filipino lodge was constituted on 6 January 1891 in Manila with Jose A. Ramos as Worshipful Master; affiliated by the Gran Oriente Español as Logia Nilad No. 144 on 10 March 1892. From here came other Filipino Lodges. In 1893, it was again del Pilar who obtained for Filipino Freemasons, the approval for the establishment of the Gran Consejo Regional de Filipinas, the first national organisation of Filipino Freemasons in the Philippines. For all his efforts, he is considered as the Father of True Filipino Freemasonry. Marcelo H. del Pilar on Freemasonry From various sources. "When the organ of the friars assures that Masonry in the Philippines is in progress; when it proclaims that the Filipinos become Masons at the risk of being exploited, then it is clear that in this country, tyranny has reached such a point that the citizens are forced to organize their spirit of protest." "Masonry rises and will rise always in any country where tyranny prevails. Our officials know this more than we do. Where there is oppression, there is protest. Masonry is the organized protest of the oppressed.” "La Masoneria Filipina", La Solidaridad. Year V. No. 111, September 15, 1893. "All Christians scattered all over the globe, all except the papists accept Masonry and identify themselves with the Masonic ideal formulated in the everlasting trilogy LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY... Masonry is not religious but not because of this will it destroy religious feeling... Masonry declares itself incapable, or refrains from everything that might be construed as religious propaganda; it recognizes that this task is the exclusive prerogative of religious institutions, that is, those which are devoted to the perfecting of man's relation with his Creator. Masonry is devoted to the relations of men with his fellowmen, that is, with humanity:' "Masoneria y Monaquismo en Filipinas”, La Solidaridad. Year V. No. 116, November 30, 1893 "It is within its rights to defend Masons residing in the Philippines, especially when the fidelity of these to the ideals of said institution are placed in a very difficult situation. A target of libel, Masonry is continually exposed to the most brutal intolerance and vexations. The indefensiveness of Masons has no reason to exist and is, to our judgment, unjust.” "To the Masonic Press”, Editorial. La Solidaridad, Year VI, No. 129, June 15, 1894 "Masonry is not a way of life for pleasure; it is a life of sacrifice. To belong to Masonry, to embrace it with faith, is a sign of a stout heart, ready to face the greatest adversities for the sake of a fellow being. Masonry is not a society of mutual aid; mutual protection is a part of its rule and every Mason has a duty of assisting his brethren, but this is not its sole and final objective. It's ideal is very much higher, much more sacred, much more thorny; it is to uphold the principle of universal brotherhood and consequently....to uphold the principle of democracy, the real and effective autonomy of human individuality, as opposed to the enslaving ambitions of those persons who nurture their greed by trampling upon the rights of others and who build their happiness at the expense of the tears of the needy.” Object of Masonry, as cited in Kalaw, ''Philippine Masonry", p. 27-8 "For Masonry is the brain, called on to think out what peoples are to do. Suppose Spain should grant us tomorrow the intervention which we have been asking for in the government or in the State. What positive and concrete solutions do we have to put into practice? What reforms have we thought out to improve the situation of the country, to develop its sources of wealth? This is what I would like the lodge to be thinking about; let each one speak out his ideas, let them give conferences on the subjects they have competence in; the businessman on business; the farmer on farming, the military man on military affairs, and that variety of studies will be fruitful for all. Thus, Masonry will be useful:' - Letter to the Consejo Regional, in John Schumacher, SJ. The Propaganda Movement, 162 The campaign (for reforms) united all the Filipino elements in Europe. The fortnightly La Solidaridad took charge of defending and voicing the aspirations of Masonry. Teodoro M. Kalaw, "Philippine Masonry", 1920 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The La Solidaridad and Philippine Journalism in Spain (1889-1895)
    44 “Our Little Newspaper”… “OUR LITTLE NEWSPAPER” THE LA SOLIDARIDAD AND PHILIPPINE JOURNALISM IN SPAIN (1889-1895) Jose Victor Z. Torres, PhD De La Salle University-Manila [email protected] “Nuestros periodiquito” or “Our little newspaper” Historian, archivist, and writer Manuel Artigas y was how Marcelo del Pilar described the periodical Cuerva had written works on Philippine journalism, that would serve as the organ of the Philippine especially during the celebration of the tercentenary reform movement in Spain. For the next seven years, of printing in 1911. A meticulous researcher, Artigas the La Solidaridad became the respected Philippine newspaper in the peninsula that voiced out the viewed and made notes on the pre-war newspaper reformists’ demands and showed their attempt to collection in the government archives and the open the eyes of the Spaniards to what was National Library. One of the bibliographical entries happening to the colony in the Philippines. he wrote was that of the La Solidaridad, which he included in his work “El Centenario de la Imprenta”, But, despite its place in our history, the story of a series of articles in the American period magazine the La Solidaridad has not entirely been told. Madalas Renacimiento Filipino which ran from 1911-1913. pag-usapan pero hindi alam ang kasaysayan. We do not know much of the La Solidaridad’s beginnings, its Here he cited a published autobiography by reformist struggle to survive as a publication, and its sad turned revolutionary supporter, Timoteo Paez as his ending. To add to the lacunae of information, there source.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Philippine Foreign Service
    The Development of the Philippine Foreign Service During the Revolutionary Period and the Filipino- American War (1896-1906): A Story of Struggle from the Formation of Diplomatic Contacts to the Philippine Republic Augusto V. de Viana University of Santo Tomas The Philippine foreign service traces its origin to the Katipunan in the early 1890s. Revolutionary leaders knew that the establishment of foreign contacts would be vital to the success of the objectives of the organization as it struggles toward the attainment of independence. This was proven when the Katipunan leaders tried to secure the support of Japanese and German governments for a projected revolution against Spain. Some patriotic Filipinos in Hong Kong composed of exiles also supported the Philippine Revolution.The organization of these exiled Filipinos eventually formed the nucleus of the Philippine Central Committee, which later became known as the Hong Kong Junta after General Emilio Aguinaldo arrived there in December 1897. After Aguinaldo returned to the Philippines in May 1898, he issued a decree reorganizing his government and creating four departments, one of which was the Department of Foreign Relations, Navy, and Commerce. This formed the basis of the foundation of the present Department of Foreign Affairs. Among the roles of this office was to seek recognition from foreign countries, acquire weapons and any other needs of the Philippine government, and continue lobbying for support from other countries. It likewise assigned emissaries equivalent to today’s ambassadors and monitored foreign reactions to the developments in the Philippines. The early diplomats, such as Felipe Agoncillo who was appointed as Minister Plenipotentiary of the revolutionary government, had their share of hardships as they had to make do with meager means.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLETION REPORT Images of Japan in Filipino Spanish-Language Newspapers, 1900-1910 Dr
    COMPLETION REPORT Images of Japan in Filipino Spanish-Language Newspapers, 1900-1910 Dr. Wystan de la Peña Department of European Languages College of Arts and Letters University of the Philippines Diliman Images of Japan in Filipino Spanish Language Newspapers, 1900-1910 is a study on the representations of Japan found in select Spanish-language newspapers during the first decade of American colonial rule. It is also the period when Spanish-era educated Filipino intellectuals -- the generation which fought the revolutionary wars against Spain (1896-1898) and America (1899-1901) -- looked at Japan as a model of an Asian nation they would like the Philippines to be. The research revealed perspectives not usually found in primary materials accessed by non-Spanish-reading Filipino historians. Articles from La Solidaridad, the Filipino reformists' organ showed favorable representations of Japan. Japan’s emergence as a regional power was capitalized by the Katipunan, the independence movement founded in 1892, when it misled Spanish authorities into thinking that Tokyo had a stake in the anti-Spain revolution by making it appear that their newspaper, Ang Kalayaan, was being published in Yokohama. During the war with the United States, the Philippine government sent Mariano Ponce as diplomatic representative to Yokohama. Ponce’s correspondence with leading Japanese figures documents his insightful observations on Japanese culture. Ponce eventually married a Japanese woman. During the American colonial period, Fil-hispanic literary production, which first came out in newspapers, projected images of Japan as a model Asian country to be emulated by a nascent Philippine polity. This is seen particularly in the works of Jesus Balmori and published speeches of T.H.
    [Show full text]
  • 8515-8904-1-PB.Pdf
    philippine studies Ateneo de Manila University • Loyola Heights, Quezon City • 1108 Philippines Towards a Radical Rizal Floro Quibuyen Philippine Studies vol. 46, no. 2 (1998): 151–183 Copyright © Ateneo de Manila University Philippine Studies is published by the Ateneo de Manila University. Contents may not be copied or sent via email or other means to multiple sites and posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s written permission. Users may download and print articles for individual, noncom- mercial use only. However, unless prior permission has been obtained, you may not download an entire issue of a journal, or download multiple copies of articles. Please contact the publisher for any further use of this work at [email protected]. http://www.philippinestudies.net Fri June 27 13:30:20 2008 Towards a Radical Rizal Horo Quibuyen The complex problem of nineteenth century Philippine nationalism, according to Setsuho Ikehata (1989, 78-81), boils down to two ques- tions: What was the content of the nationalism that gave birth to the Philippine revolution? And what was the historic process that spawned this nationalism? So far, notes Ikehata, a consensus among nationalist historians exists, based on the theoretical framework set by Agoncillo and Constantino. But recent perspectives from a younger crop of historians, ushered in by the "paradigm-setting," "history from below" (Pasyon) hermeneutic of Reynaldo Ileto, have "posed certain challenges that make a reconsideration necessary" (78). A definitive .synthesis is, of course, a "monumental task." This arti- cle is a small step in what Ikehata terms the "uphill trek to tackle the problem" of nationalism and the Philippine revolution, by doing a critique of the "existing consensus." Among Filipino historians, the late Rof-r ~eodiroAgoncillo and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Rizal: Negotiating Modernity Among the Filipino Diaspora in Hawaii
    PRODUCING RIZAL: NEGOTIATING MODERNITY AMONG THE FILIPINO DIASPORA IN HAWAII A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2014 By Ai En Isabel Chew Thesis Committee: Patricio Abinales, Chairperson Cathryn Clayton Vina Lanzona Keywords: Filipino Diaspora, Hawaii, Jose Rizal, Modernity, Rizalista Sects, Knights of Rizal 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………..…5 Chapter 1 Introduction: Rizal as a Site of Contestation………………………………………………………………………………………....6 Methodology ..................................................................................................................18 Rizal in the Filipino Academic Discourse......................................................................21 Chapter 2 Producing Rizal: Interactions on the Trans-Pacific Stage during the American Colonial Era,1898-1943…………………………..………………………………………………………...29 Rizal and the Philippine Revolution...............................................................................33 ‘Official’ Productions of Rizal under American Colonial Rule .....................................39 Rizal the Educated Cosmopolitan ..................................................................................47 Rizal as the Brown Messiah ...........................................................................................56 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................66
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine History and Government
    Remembering our Past 1521 – 1946 By: Jommel P. Tactaquin Head, Research and Documentation Section Veterans Memorial and Historical Division Philippine Veterans Affairs Office The Philippine Historic Past The Philippines, because of its geographical location, became embroiled in what historians refer to as a search for new lands to expand European empires – thinly disguised as the search for exotic spices. In the early 1400’s, Portugese explorers discovered the abundance of many different resources in these “new lands” heretofore unknown to early European geographers and explorers. The Portugese are quickly followed by the Dutch, Spaniards, and the British, looking to establish colonies in the East Indies. The Philippines was discovered in 1521 by Portugese explorer Ferdinand Magellan and colonized by Spain from 1565 to 1898. Following the Spanish – American War, it became a territory of the United States. On July 4, 1946, the United States formally recognized Philippine independence which was declared by Filipino revolutionaries from Spain. The Philippine Historic Past Although not the first to set foot on Philippine soil, the first well document arrival of Europeans in the archipelago was the Spanish expedition led by Portuguese Ferdinand Magellan, which first sighted the mountains of Samara. At Masao, Butuan, (now in Augustan del Norte), he solemnly planted a cross on the summit of a hill overlooking the sea and claimed possession of the islands he had seen for Spain. Magellan befriended Raja Humabon, the chieftain of Sugbu (present day Cebu), and converted him to Catholicism. After getting involved in tribal rivalries, Magellan, with 48 of his men and 1,000 native warriors, invaded Mactan Island.
    [Show full text]
  • FILIPINOS in HISTORY Published By
    FILIPINOS in HISTORY Published by: NATIONAL HISTORICAL INSTITUTE T.M. Kalaw St., Ermita, Manila Philippines Research and Publications Division: REGINO P. PAULAR Acting Chief CARMINDA R. AREVALO Publication Officer Cover design by: Teodoro S. Atienza First Printing, 1990 Second Printing, 1996 ISBN NO. 971 — 538 — 003 — 4 (Hardbound) ISBN NO. 971 — 538 — 006 — 9 (Softbound) FILIPINOS in HIS TOR Y Volume II NATIONAL HISTORICAL INSTITUTE 1990 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education, Culture and Sports NATIONAL HISTORICAL INSTITUTE FIDEL V. RAMOS President Republic of the Philippines RICARDO T. GLORIA Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports SERAFIN D. QUIASON Chairman and Executive Director ONOFRE D. CORPUZ MARCELINO A. FORONDA Member Member SAMUEL K. TAN HELEN R. TUBANGUI Member Member GABRIEL S. CASAL Ex-OfficioMember EMELITA V. ALMOSARA Deputy Executive/Director III REGINO P. PAULAR AVELINA M. CASTA/CIEDA Acting Chief, Research and Chief, Historical Publications Division Education Division REYNALDO A. INOVERO NIMFA R. MARAVILLA Chief, Historic Acting Chief, Monuments and Preservation Division Heraldry Division JULIETA M. DIZON RHODORA C. INONCILLO Administrative Officer V Auditor This is the second of the volumes of Filipinos in History, a com- pilation of biographies of noted Filipinos whose lives, works, deeds and contributions to the historical development of our country have left lasting influences and inspirations to the present and future generations of Filipinos. NATIONAL HISTORICAL INSTITUTE 1990 MGA ULIRANG PILIPINO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Lianera, Mariano 1 Llorente, Julio 4 Lopez Jaena, Graciano 5 Lukban, Justo 9 Lukban, Vicente 12 Luna, Antonio 15 Luna, Juan 19 Mabini, Apolinario 23 Magbanua, Pascual 25 Magbanua, Teresa 27 Magsaysay, Ramon 29 Makabulos, Francisco S 31 Malabanan, Valerio 35 Malvar, Miguel 36 Mapa, Victorino M.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Authority, Nationalism, and Colonial Entanglements Between Germany, Spain, and the Philippines, 1850 to 1900
    Scientific Authority, Nationalism, and Colonial Entanglements between Germany, Spain, and the Philippines, 1850 to 1900 Nathaniel Parker Weston A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2012 Reading Committee: Uta G. Poiger, Chair Vicente L. Rafael Lynn Thomas Program Authorized to Offer Degree: History ©Copyright 2012 Nathaniel Parker Weston University of Washington Abstract Scientific Authority, Nationalism, and Colonial Entanglements between Germany, Spain, and the Philippines, 1850 to 1900 Nathaniel Parker Weston Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Uta G. Poiger This dissertation analyzes the impact of German anthropology and natural history on colonialism and nationalism in Germany, Spain, the Philippines, and the United States during the second half of the nineteenth-century. In their scientific tracts, German authors rehearsed the construction of racial categories among colonized peoples in the years prior to the acquisition of formal colonies in Imperial Germany and portrayed their writings about Filipinos as superior to all that had been previously produced. Spanish writers subsequently translated several German studies to promote continued economic exploitation of the Philippines and uphold notions of Spaniards’ racial supremacy over Filipinos. However, Filipino authors also employed the translations, first to demand colonial reform and to examine civilizations in the Philippines before and after the arrival of the Spanish, and later to formulate nationalist arguments. By the 1880s, the writings of Filipino intellectuals found an audience in newly established German scientific associations, such as the German Society for Anthropology, Ethnology, and Prehistory, and German-language periodicals dealing with anthropology, ethnology, geography, and folklore.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Masonry to 1890 the Masonic Lodges Served As
    PHILIPPINE MASONRY TO 1890 JOHN N. SCHUMACHER, S.J. THE MASONIC LODGES SERVED AS CENTERS FOR MANY OF the Liberal conspiracies in Spain against clerical and reactionary governments during the first three-quarters of the nineteenth century, 1 and Masonry played a considerable part in the emancipation of the Spanish-American republics.2 In Cuba, too, Masonic influence was strong in the insurrections of the second half of the nineteenth century.3 It might be expected then, that in a society far more theocratic in nature than those mentioned - as was the nineteenth century Philippines - that Masonry would play a considerable role in any nationalist movement. This was because of its anti-clerical orientation and because of the opportunity its secrecy allowed for clandestine activity. It is a fact that almost every Filipino nationalist leader of the Propaganda Period was at one time or another a Mason. But the role of Masonry in the nation­ alist movement and in the Revolution which followed it, has, it seems, fre­ quently been exaggerated and misinterpreted by the friends of Masonry as well as by its enemies. Particularly the writing of the Friars and Jesuits of the Revolutionary period (both published works and private correspond­ ence) are wont to see Masons in every corner.4 Books have not been lacking, 1 See Antonio Ballesteros y Beretta, Historia de Espa1ia y su influeneia en la historia universal (2nd ed.; Barcelona: Salvat, 1943 ff.), X, 183-184; Gerald Brenan, Spanish Labyrinth (2nd ed.; Cambridge: University Press, 1950), 206-208. Books such as Eduardo Comin Colomer, La Masoneria .en Espana (Apuntes para una interpretacion mas6nica de la historia patria) (Madrid: Editora Nacional, 1944) and the annotated edition by Mauricio Carlavilla of Miguel Morayta's M asoneria ~spanola.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Filipino Heroes Supplementary for the Students
    THE GREAT FILIPINO HEROES SUPPLEMENTARY FOR THE STUDENTS compiled and edited by: Rheno A. Velasco LOACAN PUBLISHING HOUSE Publisher / Distributor Philippine Copyright 1997 All Rights Reserved Copyright c 1997 by Rheno A. Velasco and Loacan Publishing House Published & Exclusively Distributed by: LOACAN PUBLISHING HOUSE ISBN. 971-668-025-2 TABLE OF CONTENSTS CHAPTER PAGE 1 OUR GREAT HEROES General Emilio Aguinaldo 1-2 Teodora Alonzo 3 Cayetano S. Arellano 4-5 Melchora Aquino 6-7 Francisco Baltazar 8-9 Andres Bonifacio 10-11 Jose Apolonio Burgos 12 Felipe Calderon 13 Francisco Dagohoy 14 Gregorio del Pilar 15 Marcelo H. del Pilar 16 Mariano Gomez 17 Emilio Jacinto 18-19 Graciano Lopez Jaena 20 Sultan Kudarat 21 Rajah Lakandula 22 Lapu-Lapu 23 General Antonio Luna 24-25 Juan Luna 26-27 Teresa Magbanua 28-29 Apolinario Mabini 30-31 General Miguel Malvar 32-33 Timoteo Paez 34-35 Pedro A. Paterno 36 Tomas Pinpin 37 Panday Pira 38 Mariano Ponce ..39 Purmassuri 40 Jose Rizal 41-42 Margarita Roxas . 43 Ignacia del Espiritu Santo .44 Jose Abad Santos 45-46 Epifanio de los Santos .47 Diego Silang 48 Reyna Sima ......49 Princess Urduja 50 Raja Soliman 51 Jose Palma Velasco 52 Jacinto Zamora 53 Gabriela Silang 54 CHAPTER II REMEMBERING THE CONTRIBUTION OF SOME FILIPINO HEROES 55-94 Alejandro Roces Jr. Ambrosio Flores Anaclito Lacson Ananias Diokno Antonio Ma. Regidor Artemio Ricarte Baldemero Aguinaldo Bonifacio Arevalo Candido Iban Candido Tirona Carlos P. Romulo Cesar Fernando Basa Claro M. Recto Crispulo Aguinaldo Cripulo Zamora Daniel Maramba Eleuterio Adevoso Esteban Contreras Felipe Salvador Felix Napao Galura Fernando Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • José Rizal En La Literatura Y En La Historia De Filipinas José Rizal En La Literatura Y En La Historia De Filipinas Jose Rizal in Filipino Literature and History
    José Rizal en la literatura y en la historia de Filipinas de Filipinas y en la historia en la literatura José Rizal Jose Rizal in Filipino Literature and History Ambeth R. Ocampo Ateneo de Manila University / José Rizal in Filipino Literature and History A los filipinos del sigloxxi su lengua les separa de su historia. Filipinos in the twenty-first century are separated from their José Rizal, el héroe nacional de Filipinas, escribió mucho en past by the language they speak. While it is true that Jose español para un país que no puede leerlo en su idioma ori- Rizal, National Hero of the Philippines, wrote a great deal ginal. Pero lo cierto es que el lugar que ocupa en las letras for a nation that cannot read him in the original Spanish, filipinas está asegurado gracias a su excelente obra, que in- nevertheless his vast and excellent opus guarantees his cluye las novelas Noli me tangere de 1887 y El filibusterismo place in Filipino letters. These include, of course, his two de 1891, así como la edición anotada de los Sucesos de las major novels, Noli me tangere, published in 1887, and El Islas Filipinas de Antonio de Morga, publicada en 1890. A filibusterismo,published in 1891, and an annotated edition of pesar de que hoy en día se lea principalmente en traduccio- Antonio de Morga’s Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas that Rizal nes al inglés y al filipino, su posición privilegiada dentro de la completed and published in 1890. Despite the fact that today literatura filipina se debe a su talento para la escritura, tanto Rizal’s works are read mainly in translations into English and como a su contribución al nacimiento de la nación.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Biak-Na-Bato
    The Republic of Biak-na-Bato The flag used by the Republic of Biak-na-Bato. Overview The Philippine Revolution began in August 1896 with the founding of the Katipunan by Andres Bonifacio. Intended to be a secret anti-colonialist group, their goal was to free the Philippines from Spanish rule. Though their initial attack on Manila failed, the group had inspired the other nearby provinces to begin revolting as well. With Bonifacio’s death a year later, the revolution was lead by Emilio Aguinaldo, who formed his own government – the Republic of Biak-na-Bato, named after the place where he hid from the Spanish cordon. The constitution drafted on November 1 by Felix Ferrer and Isabelo Artacho, called the Provisional Constitution of the Philippine Republic, was based on the Cuban Constitution (also known as the Jimaguayu Constitution). The Republic’s leaders were also inaugurated and given their respective positions. The Republic, however, only lasted a month, and ended with the signing of a peace treaty between the Filipinos and the Spaniards, along with Aguinaldo’s self-exile to Hong Kong. This textbook is free for you thanks to the generosity of The Inaugurated Leaders of Biak-na-Bato The members of the Republic’s Supreme Council that were elected and inaugurated in Biak-na-Bato, San Miguel, Bulacan on November 2, 1897 were the following: • Emilio Aguinaldo – President • Mariano Trias – Vice-President • Antonio Montenegro – Secretary of Foreign Affairs • Emiliano Riego de Dios – Secretary of War • Isabelo Artacho – Secretary of the Interior • Baldomero Aguinaldo – Secretary of the Treasury The Revolutionary Demands Despite the decree issued by Governor-General Primo de Rivera on July 2, 1897, more and more people were joining the revolution.
    [Show full text]