DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction Mayotte Is an Overseas Department of France Within the Comorian Islands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Mayotte Is an Overseas Department of France Within the Comorian Islands Helsinki International Model United Nations 2015 | XV Annual Session Forum: General Assembly 3 Issue: Question of Comorian Island of Mayotte Student Officer: Ms. Min Kyung Jin Position: Deputy Chair of the 3rd Committee ____________________________________________________________ Introduction Mayotte is an overseas department of France within the Comorian Islands. It is one of the four islands representing the Comorian Islands. It is located in the northern Mozambique Channel in the Indian Ocean off the coast of Southeast Africa, namely between northwestern Madagascar and northeastern Mozambique. 1 Mayotte has been a French territory since 1843. After the Comoros independence referendum in 1974, Mayotte’s residents decided to retain their relation with France even though all the other islands in Comoros voted for independence. The Comoros government, which represents the Comorian archipelago (four islands), 2 continues to claim sovereignty over Mayotte; this has been a problem since Mayotte is officially recognized as France’s territorial community. 3 Thus, this aroused international tension as French and Comoros governments both claim sovereignty over Mayotte. The question of the Comorian Island of Mayotte was often debated in United Nations General Assembly up to 1995. Since 1995, it has not been discussed4. 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayotte 2 http://www.beit-salam.km/ (Comorian Islands Official Website) 3 http://www.france.fr/en/regions-and-cities/mayotte-preserved-archipelago.html 4 http://research.un.org/en/docs/ga/quick/regular/50 Research Report | Page 1 of 10 Helsinki International Model United Nations 2015 | XV Annual Session Definition of Key terms In order to fully understand the question at hand in its context we must clarify the following terms: Overseas department (DOM): Departments of France that are outside metropolitan France. Only territories of France are called an ‘overseas department’. 5They have the same political status as the metropolitan departments. Comoros government: Government representing the Comorian Islands. Mayotte: An archipelago that is a hybrid of Africa, the East and the West, Mayotte became a French colony in 1841, then an Overseas Territory in 1946. In 2011, its 180,000 inhabitants chose by referendum to become the 101st French and 5th overseas département.6 Archipelago: A group of islands. Mahorans: Residents of Mayotte Referendum: Submission of an issue of public importance to the direct vote of the electorate, thus, a vote conducted to determine people’s views. 7 Background In 1843, Mayotte was colonized by France and in 1886 the whole Comorian archipelago became France’s protectorate. Since then, the Comoros had protested for their independence. In 1947, Comoros became an overseas territory of France and were given representation in the French parliament, and in 1961, they were given autonomy. The Comoros still continued their resistance for their sovereignty. As a result of their continuous contention and international recognition over the dignity of Occident nation’s colonies, an independence referendum was held in the Comoros, in December 19748. (The Comorian archipelago is composed of four islands; Anjouan, Grande Comore, Mayotte and Mohéli9.) Three out of four (….) Comorian islands had overall results of more than 99% for the independence, whereas only 36% of residents in Mayotte were against it, willing to maintain the association with 5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_department 6 http://www.france.fr/en/regions-and-cities/mayotte-preserved-archipelago.html 7 http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/referendum?searchDictCode=all 8 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13229685 9 http://www.beit-salam.km/ Research Report | Page 2 of 10 Helsinki International Model United Nations 2015 | XV Annual Session France’s government. For Against Invalid Total Registered Voter Island votes votes voters Turnout % Votes % Votes % Anjouan 58,897 99.93 44 0.07 4 58,945 61,406 95.99 Grande Comore 84,123 99.98 21 0.02 39 84,183 89,215 94.36 Mayotte 5,110 36.78 8,783 63.22 84 13,977 17,946 77.88 Mohéli 6,054 99.92 5 0.08 3 6,062 6,351 95.45 Total 154,184 94.57 8,853 5.43 130 163,167 174,918 93.28 Source: African Elections Database10 President Ahmed Abdallah proclaimed that independence would be declared in agreement with the French government. Thus, France granted independence to the Comorian archipelago excluding Mayotte so that the Comorian island of Mayotte remained having a government dependent to French policies. However, what the Comoros claim is that the 1974 referendum was an archipelago-wide vote, not an island-by-island decision11. In July 1975, Comoros unilaterally declared independence. A referendum was subsequently held in Mayotte in February 1976 on remaining part of the Comoros, but 99% of the voters rejected that proposal. 12 The conflicts over the Comorian island of Mayotte have been addressed in several of the 10 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comorian_independence_referendum,_1974 11 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comorian_independence_referendum,_1974 12 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahoran_Comoros_referendum,_1976 Research Report | Page 3 of 10 Helsinki International Model United Nations 2015 | XV Annual Session United Nations’ conferences, 13 the first of which was held in 1976. The United Nations Security Council also intended to pass a resolution recognizing Comorian sovereignty over Mayotte, supported by 11 of the 15 members of the council, but it was vetoed by France alone. As time passed, the UN General Assembly has adopted a series of resolutions on the issues with the title ‘Question of the Comorian Island of Mayotte’ up to 1995. Since 1995, the subject of Mayotte has not been discussed by the General Assembly. 1415 Mayotte became an overseas department of France in March 2011 in consequences of a 29th March 2009 referendum.16 Mahoran status referendum, 2009 Choice Votes % Yes 41,492 95.22 No 2,084 4.78 Valid votes 43,576 99.14 Invalid or blank votes 380 0.86 Total votes 43,956 100.00 Source: malango.fr The ‘yes’ option had approximately 95.2% of approval (it was to change the island’s status from ‘overseas community’ to ‘overseas department.) Consequently, Mayotte became France’s 101st department; gradually, it is changing its local judicial, economic and social laws 13 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/31/4 14 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/49/18 (latest UN resolution) 15 http://research.un.org/en/docs/ga/quick/regular/49 (49th session) 16 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahoran_status_referendum,_2009 Research Report | Page 4 of 10 Helsinki International Model United Nations 2015 | XV Annual Session conforming to French policies. Today, the population of Mayotte is approximately 212,65017. 95% of Mahorans are Sunni Muslims (in the referendum, the Islamic imams and religious leaders were against the dependency to France). After the referendum and Comoros’ gain of independence, the Comoros islands became impoverished. The continued political union with France has allowed Mayotte to remain relatively prosperous in its economic situation that is much better than that of the independent Comoros. As a result, Mayotte had innumerous illegal immigrants from other Comorian Islands, gradually becoming one third of total Mayotte population. 18The Comoros, which have suffered from economic and political instability since their independence, continue to claim Mayotte as part of their territory. Relevant parties and member states France is one of the member states that has the ‘veto power’ in Security Council. It vetoed the Security Council draft resolution of 1976 recognizing Comoros sovereignty over Mayotte. It had Mayotte as its protectorate in 1943, and gave independence to Comoros in 1975. It now has Mayotte as its overseas department. It gives template policies to help the government of Mayotte establish new laws according to French policies, and provides some economic aid. Mayotte is an overseas department of France, and retained its dependency to France when it had a referendum. It aims to further develop its connection with France. Today, it has more than one third of its population from other islands because of illegal immigrants. Comoros archipelago is the group of islands that Mayotte is a part of. It claims Mayotte is a part of its territory. The archipelago has experienced an impoverishment since its independence. The Comoros government continuously claims sovereignty over the island of Mayotte. Initiative Development (ID): is the only western NGO operating in Anjouan (since 1996) and Mohéli (since 2006), underprivileged islands in the Comoros archipelago since 1996 which act as uncompensated reservoirs for candidates for immigration to Mayotte19 UNDP (United Nations Development Program): UNDP is one of United Nation organizations that has targets for reducing poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, environmental degradation and discrimination against women by 2015.20 It aims to reduce impoverishment in Comorian Islands Organization of African Unity (OAU): The OAU aims to promote the unity and solidarity of the African states. It also defends the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of African states. The OAU cooperates with Comoros government and rejects French control 17 http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?ref_id=19214 18 http://www.km.undp.org/ 19 http://www.id-ong.org/en/comoros 20 http://www.globalhand.org/en/organisations/24123 http://www.km.undp.org/ Research Report | Page 5 of 10 Helsinki International Model United Nations 2015 | XV Annual Session over Comorian island of Mayotte. 21 Timeline Year Event 1843 France colonizes the Comorian Island of Mayotte. 1886 The Comorian archipelago becomes France’s protectorate. 1947 Comoros become an overseas territory of France and are given representation in the French parliament. 1961 Comoros are given autonomy. 1974 Three of the islands making up the Comoros vote for independence, but the fourth island, Mayotte, votes to stay with France.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is European Integration Really About? a Political Guide for Economists
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT IS EUROPEAN INTEGRATION REALLY ABOUT? A POLITICAL GUIDE FOR ECONOMISTS Enrico Spolaore Working Paper 19122 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19122 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2013 I am grateful to Jeff Frieden, Yannis Ioannides, Deborah Menegotto, Stelios Michalopoulos, Romain Wacziarg, and the editors of the Journal of Economic Perspectives (David Autor, Chang-Tai Hseih, and Tim Taylor) for their detailed comments. I also benefited from helpful feedback and conversations with many people, including Lorenzo Bini-Smaghi, Giancarlo Corsetti, Henrik Enderlein, Kai Konrad, Athanasios Orphanides, Lucas Papademos, and Daniela Schwarzer, and participants in the political economy discussion group at Harvard and a conference at the Condorcet Center for Political Economy in Rennes. Of course I am the only one responsible for all opinions and errors in this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Enrico Spolaore. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. What is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists Enrico Spolaore NBER Working Paper No. 19122 June 2013 JEL No. F15,F50,F55,H40,H77,N44 ABSTRACT Europe’s monetary union is part of a broader process of integration that started in the aftermath of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Politics and International Cooperation by Andrew Moravcsik Department of Government Harvard University
    Center for European Studies Working Paper Series #52 Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation by Andrew Moravcsik Department of Government Harvard University Center for European Studies, Harvard University 27 Kirkland Street, Cambridge MA 02138 Tel.: 617-495-4303, x205 / Fax: 617-495-8509 e-mail: [email protected] Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, NY (1-4 September 1994) Most contemporary theories of international cooperation treat states as unitary actors and, therefore, focus primarily on the functional benefits of cooperation or the collective action problems states confront in realizing it.1 Less attention is paid to the impact of international negotiations and institutions on domestic politics, or to the consequences for international cooperation. This essay offers a theory of when and how international cooperation redistributes domestic power resources between state and society. Redistribution, it is argued, generally empowers national executives, permitting them to loosen domestic constraints imposed by legislatures, interest groups, and other societal actors. These shifts in domestic 'influence have important consequences for the nature of international cooperation. More specifically, I advance three arguments, each of which challenges existing understandings of international cooperation. First, international negotiations and institutions reallocate political resources by changing the domestic institutional.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Stability and the Division of Czechoslovakia
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1996 Political Stability and the Division of Czechoslovakia Timothy M. Kuehnlein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kuehnlein, Timothy M., "Political Stability and the Division of Czechoslovakia" (1996). Master's Theses. 3826. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3826 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL STABILITY AND THE DIVISION OF CZECHOSLOVAKIA by Timothy M. Kuehnlein, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1996 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this project was both a tedious and rewarding experience. With the highest expectations for the style and content of the presentation, I have attempted to be as concise yet thorough as possible in the presentation and defense of the argument. The composition of this thesis entails nearly two years of diligent work outside of general course studies. It includes preliminary readings in Central and East European affairs, an extensive excursion throughout the Czech and Slovak republics with readings in the theory of political stability, the history and politics of Czecho­ slovakia, in addition to composing the text. My pursuit was driven by a passion for the topic, a quest for know­ ledge and understanding, and the argument's potential for continued development.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Europe an Optimal Political Area?
    ALBERTO ALESINA Harvard University GUIDO TABELLINI Bocconi University FRANCESCO TREBBI University of British Columbia Is Europe an Optimal Political Area? ABSTRACT Employing a wide range of individual-level surveys, we study the extent of cultural and institutional heterogeneity within the European Union and how this changed between 1980 and 2009. We present several novel empir- ical regularities that paint a complex picture. Although Europe has experienced both systematic economic convergence and an increased coordination across national and subnational business cycles since 1980, this has not been accom- panied by cultural or institutional convergence. Such persistent heterogeneity does not necessarily spell doom for further political integration, however. Com- pared with observed heterogeneity within EU member states themselves, or in well-functioning federations such as the United States, cultural diversity across EU members is of a similar order of magnitude. The main stumbling block on the road to further political integration may not be heterogeneity in fundamental cultural traits, but other cleavages, such as national identities. he European Union is facing hard challenges. Throughout the EU, Tmany citizens have become less trusting of EU institutions and less tol- erant of supranational interference with domestic policies. As a result, the process of European integration is struggling—and, for the first time, has even reversed direction with Brexit. Populist parties, which blame the EU Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Guido Tabellini and Francesco Trebbi received financial support for this research from the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. Alberto Alesina and Tabellini are also affiliated with the Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research at Bocconi University.
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico Status Hearing Committee on Resources
    PUERTO RICO STATUS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 856 A BILL TO PROVIDE A PROCESS LEADING TO FULL SELF- GOVERNMENT FOR PUERTO RICO MARCH 19, 1997ÐWASHINGTON, DC Serial No. 105±16 Printed for the use of the Committee on Resources ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 40±445 u WASHINGTON : 1997 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES DON YOUNG, Alaska, Chairman W.J. (BILLY) TAUZIN, Louisiana GEORGE MILLER, California JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts JIM SAXTON, New Jersey NICK J. RAHALL II, West Virginia ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland Samoa KEN CALVERT, California NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii RICHARD W. POMBO, California SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming OWEN B. PICKETT, Virginia HELEN CHENOWETH, Idaho FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey LINDA SMITH, Washington CALVIN M. DOOLEY, California GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California CARLOS A. ROMERO-BARCELOÂ , Puerto WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina Rico WILLIAM M. (MAC) THORNBERRY, Texas MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York JOHN SHADEGG, Arizona ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD, Guam JOHN E. ENSIGN, Nevada SAM FARR, California ROBERT F. SMITH, Oregon PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island CHRIS CANNON, Utah ADAM SMITH, Washington KEVIN BRADY, Texas WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts JOHN PETERSON, Pennsylvania CHRIS JOHN, Louisiana RICK HILL, Montana DONNA CHRISTIAN-GREEN, Virgin Islands BOB SCHAFFER, Colorado NICK LAMPSON, Texas JIM GIBBONS, Nevada RON KIND, Wisconsin MICHAEL D. CRAPO, Idaho LLOYD A.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Integration and National Self-Determination
    New England Journal of Public Policy Volume 31 Issue 2 Special Issue: ICO Article 7 11-20-2019 European Union Integration and National Self-Determination Mare Ushkovska International Communities Organisation Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Ushkovska, Mare (2019) "European Union Integration and National Self-Determination," New England Journal of Public Policy: Vol. 31 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol31/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Journal of Public Policy by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New England Journal of Public Policy European Union Integration and National Self-Determination Mare Ushkovska International Communities Organisation Recent demands for secession in several EU member states bring the issue of self- determination to the forefront of the debate about the future of the European Union. This article explores the European Union’s attitudes toward the international right to self- determination in the context of the rising salience of the greater political union between member states. The focus of the European project, in direct contrast to the glorification of nationhood, is on consensual decision-making rather than sovereignty, making self- determination obsolete in a reality of EU integration. This research finds that recognition of, or references to, the right to self-determination of peoples are absent from EU law sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulawar KHAN 2014.Pdf
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/research/westminsterresearch Politics of nationalism, federalism, and separatism: The case of Balochistan in Pakistan Gulawar Khan Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © The Author, 2014. This is an exact reproduction of the paper copy held by the University of Westminster library. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Users are permitted to download and/or print one copy for non-commercial private study or research. Further distribution and any use of material from within this archive for profit-making enterprises or for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: (http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] POLITICS OF NATIONALISM, FEDERALISM, AND SEPARATISM: THE CASE OF BALOCHISTAN IN PAKISTAN GULAWAR KHAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014 Author’s declaration This thesis is carried out as per the guidelines and regulations of the University of Westminster. I hereby declare that the materials contained in this thesis have not been previously submitted for a degree in any other university, including the University of Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Obligation and Political Secession
    Political Obligation and Political Secession Michael Tomz Department of Government Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 voice: (617) 495-8283 email: [email protected] December 1994 Draft: Comments welcome! Political Obligation and Political Secession1 As the twentieth century draws to a close, centrifugal forces are threatening the territorial integrity of multicultural states. From Bosnia and Chechnya to Sri Lanka and Somalia, secessionist movements are warring to achieve politically independent governments and ethnically homogenous communities. Separatist tendencies have also reached western soils; Francophones in Quebec, Basques in Escudi, and even disgruntled taxpayers on Staten Island, New York, have recently clamored for greater autonomy. According to one estimate, active campaigns for either full sovereignty or lesser degrees of political self-determination now operate in more than sixty countries, one-third of all members in the United Nations.2 Each day the political and ethnic dissonance continues to mount. The swelling number of secessionist movements has evoked a vigorous response from political philosophers, many offering their own reflections on the morality of secession. Ranging from the unconditionally permissive to the highly restrictive, their new theories engage such challenging topics as the nature of liberal democracy, the importance of cultural health, the concept of collective rights, and the content of distributive justice. Strangely, the emerging literature devotes scant attention to the problem of political obligations, one of the most prominent issues in nineteenth-century debates surrounding the Southern secession from the American Union. Furthermore, the few pieces mentioning political obligations conclude, almost invariably, that such obligations pose no moral hurdles for separatist movements. This article contends, on the contrary, that political obligations can subvert the legitimacy of secession.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Federalism Teach Us About the European Union? the German Experience
    What Can Federalism Teach Us About the European Union? The German Experience Tanja A. Börzel Universität Heidelberg Paper prepared for the Conference „Governing together in the New Europe“, Robinson College, Cambridge, 12-13 April 2003. Prof. Dr. Tanja A. Börzel Associate Professor of International Relations Institute for Political Science Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Marstallstr. 6 D-69117 Heidelberg Tel: +496221/5428-68 Fax: +496221/5428-96 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Website: http://www2.hu-berlin.de/compliance/ © Royal Institute of International Affairs,,2003 Published in Great Britain in 2003 by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House,10 St James ’s Square,London SW1Y 4LE (Charity Registration No.208223) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted by any other means without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publishers. The Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)is an independent body which promotes the rigorous study of international questions and does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author. A European Federation or a Federal Europe? In an attempt to re-launch the discussion on the future shape of the European order, Germany’s Foreign Minister, Joschka Fischer, described the European Union (EU) as a ‘European Federation’.1 His intervention provoked a heated political
    [Show full text]
  • The Clash Between Formalism and Reality in the Brazilian Civil Service
    THE CLASH BETWEEN FORMALISM AND REALITY IN THE BRAZILIAN CIVIL SERVICE By LAWRENCE SHERMAN GRAHAM A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA December, 1965 tmiyjifififP 0F FLORIDA 3 1262 08666 481 9 For Jane ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank the following people for assistance in the preparation of this dissertation: Professors Harry Kantor (chairman) , Gladys M. Kammerer, and Harry W. Hutchinson, of the University of Florida, who served as my reading com- mittee; Professors Manning J. Dauer, Frederick H. Hartmann, and Alfred Hower, also of the University of Florida; Pro- fessor Diogo Lordello de Mello, director of the research center at the Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Professors Edward J. Jones, Jr. (chief of party) and David Mars, members of the University of Southern Calif ornia/AID is I mission in public administration at the Fundacao Getulio Var- gas; Peter D. Bell, of the Ford Foundation, Rio de Janeiro; the secretaries in the offices occupied by the University of Southern California mission at the Fundacao Getulio Vargas — especially Dona Irene — without whose many favors and as- sistance in the scheduling of interviews much of the material gathered here could not have been collected; Arminda de Campos and Gil Vicente Soares, students in the Brazilian School of Public Administration (EBAP) who, as research assistants, de- voted many long hours of work to the compiling of newspaper materials; Mrs. Clarence Singletary, of Daytona Beach, Florida, and my wife, Jane Merrell Graham, for preliminary typing; and Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Perspectives on Nuclear Disarmament
    NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT EDITED BY: Barry M. Blechman Alexander K. Bollfrass March 2010 Copyright ©2010 The Henry L. Stimson Center Cover design by Shawn Woodley All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Henry L. Stimson Center. The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone: 202-223-5956 fax: 202-238-9604 www.stimson.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .....................................................................................................................v Introduction ...........................................................................................................vii BRAZIL | A Brazilian Perspective on Nuclear Disarmament Marcos C. de Azambuja.....................................................................1 CHINA | China’s Nuclear Strategy in a Changing World Stategic Situation Major General Pan Zhenqiang (Retired)........................................13 FRANCE | French Perspectives on Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Disarmament Bruno Tertrais ..................................................................................37 INDIA | Indian Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons Rajesh M. Basrur .............................................................................59 IRAN | Iranian Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons Anoush Ehteshami............................................................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Nationality Or Religion? Views of Central Asian Islam (1901-1991)
    HAOL, Núm. 4 (Primavera, 2004), 43-57 ISSN 1696-2060 NATIONALITY OR RELIGION? VIEWS OF CENTRAL ASIAN ISLAM (1901-1991) H. B. Paksoy Texas Tech University, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Recibido: 15 Marzo 2004/ Revisado: 17 Abril 2004/ Aceptado: 11 Mayo 2004/ Publicación Online: 15 Junio 2004 Resumen: As the historical vista has already Central Asia despite their fascination with the indicated, nationality does not necessarily equal area. What they did not know, the authors religion, or vice-versa. Both attributes form created3. Only later would the Westerners begin parts of an identity defining function, as seen fit to learn the Central Asian languages and by the polity or the individual concerned. This is dialects, in order to read what the Central Asians naturally true for Central Asians as well, as they had written about themselves. have been buffeted by numerous waves of assaults, political or religious, on their identities The designation Altai, as Ozbek and Kazakh, are over time stretching across millenia. Added to primarily geographical, tribal or confederation that mix are other elements, such as names, not ethnonyms. Those appellations were consciousness of origins as defined by leavening mistakenly or deliberately turned into 'ethnic' or documents and linguistic affinity. This paper 'political' classifications by early explorers or explores the basics of the mix that forms the intelligence agents arriving in those lands ahead underlying factors. Nationality, religion, Central of the Russian armies and bureaucrats. Early in Asia, literature, politics, anthropology, Soviet the 8th century, the Turks themselves provided Union, ethnography, orientalism, democracy, an account of their identity, political order and nation-building, military, fundamentalism, history.
    [Show full text]