DOCSLIB.ORG

VISITED AUTHORITIES Within the Best Practices Programme for Local Authorities in Moldova 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VISITED AUTHORITIES Within the Best Practices Programme for Local Authorities in Moldova 2011 VISITED AUTHORITIES within the Best Practices Programme for Local Authorities in Moldova 2011 - 2012 I. Good Governance: citizens participation and successful community partnerships No. Locality Title of the practice Date of visit 1. Bahrinesti, Floresti district Village with 12 mayors 18 July 2. Calarasi, Calarasi district Supporting local authorities to develop/update 24 July the Socio-Economic development Strategy 3. Calfa, Anenii Noi district Creating the Temporary Placement Centre for 13 June elders 4. Joltai, Autonomous Local community involvement in construction of 20 June Territorial Unit of Gagauzia the Sport Centre 5. Ungheni, Ungheni district Access to inclusive education for 376 children 4 July aged 2 - 6 years 6. Vinogradovca, Taraclia Construction of water supply and sanitary 20 June district facilities in the local kindergarten from Ciumai village, Vinogradovca region II. Local socio-economic development: performances and achievements No. Locality Title of the practice Date of visit 1. Budesti, Chisinau Creating a recreational area 30 July municipality 2. Cetireni, Ungheni district Village water supply 24 July 3. Chirileni, Ungheni district Construction of water supply system in the 24 July village 4. Cotul Morii, Hincesti district The project „A helping hand for children” 4 July 5. Radulenii Vechi, Floresti Social center for the elderly, social canteen for 18 July district socially social vulnerable people 6. Larga, Briceni district Business incubator from Larga- an important 11 July factor in activities regarding active employment measures of the yeah from the region 1 III. Successful models for energy efficiency at community level No. Locality Title of the practice Date of visit 1. Antonesti, Cantemir district Gymnasium modernization by implementing 27 June energy efficiency concepts at the local level 2. Busila, Ungheni district Installing solar collectors in the kindergarten 24 July 3. Singerei, Singerei district Changing the interior lighting in High School 11 July "Dimitrie Cantemir" 4. Tatarauca Veche, Soroca Street lighting modernization 18 July district IV. Efficient management of local public services No. Locality Title of the practice Date of visit 1. Cristesti, Nisporeni district Construction of 20 platformsa and 60 4 July containers 60, as well as purchasing a car for collection / transportation of waste 2. Festelita, Stefan Voda district Renovation of the village Hall square of the to 13 June ensure access for disabled and retired people to the village Hall to obtain public services and to create a recreational area for categories mentioned 3. Milestii Mici, Ialoveni district Efficient waste management 13 June 4. Plopi, Cantemir district Supporting women and men with serious 27 June disabilities by creating the social service at home 5. Sarata Galbena, Hincesti Creating a recreationional area near the village 27 June district 6. Ungheni, Ungheni district Rehabilitation and vocational guidance Center 4 July for persons with disabilities 7. Varzaresti, Nisponeni Using the Administrative Management 4 July disctrict Information System (SIMA) in the activity of the Hall and for the cadastral and land transparency 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Projects Carried out Or Ongoing in the Framework of "Support to Confidence Building Measures" Programme (March 2015- March 2018)
    Support to Confidence Building Measures Programme This Programme is funded by the European Union, and implemented by the United Nations Development Programme PROJECTS CARRIED OUT OR ONGOING IN THE FRAMEWORK OF "SUPPORT TO CONFIDENCE BUILDING MEASURES" PROGRAMME (MARCH 2015- MARCH 2018) No Project title Budget, EUR Sector Implementing partners Implementation period/Expected dates BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT Support to a set of CSOs and BAs and develop Business Chamber of Commerce and Industry of 29 February – 29 April, 2016 1 9,314 € their capacities Development Moldova In-depth analysis of the Business Development Business Alternative Internationale de 2 Services market on both banks of the Nistru 67,568 € 18 August, 2015 – 29 April, 2016 Development Dezvoltare river Improve the opportunities and services 3 Business Alternative Internationale de available for business communities on both 172,725 € 21 December 2015 – 21 December 2017 Development Dezvoltare banks of the Nistru river Study on entrepreneurship perception among Business 4 youth (aged 18-35) on the left bank of the 22,519 € CBS-AXA SRL 20 October, 2015 – 20 May, 2016 Development Nistru river Economic research and forecasts about the Business AO Centrul Analitic Independent 5 economic situation of the Transnistrian region 60,011 € Development 15 October, 2015 – 15 October, 2016 EXPERT-GRUP Creation of Job Opportunities through Business Business Chamber of Commerce and Industry of 6 Support for Youth in the Transnistria region 344,561 € Development 1 September, 2015 – 30 April,
    [Show full text]
  • De Intenlie Ln Vederea Initierii Cooperirii Intercomunale
    L- REPUBLICA MOLDOVA MEMORANDUM de intenlie ln vederea initierii cooperirii intercomunale incheiat astdzi 1 Decembrie 2020, in Municipiul Ungheni Pdrlile: Municipiul Ungheni, reprezentat de primar Dl Alexandru Ambros Oragul Corneqti, reprezentat de primar Dna Buga Vera Comuna Agronomovca, reprezentati de primar Dl Grosu Vasile Comuna Alexeevca, reprezentatd de primar Dl Bujor Vitalie Comuna Boghenii Noi, reprezentatd de primar Dl Filipovici Gheorghe Comuna Buciumeni, reprezentatd de primar Dl Petriciuc Filip Satul Bumbdta, reprezentat de primar Dl Paladi Dumitru Satul Bugila, reprezentat de primar Dl V?rlan lgor Satul Cetireni, reprezentat de primar Dna Dicusar Ana Satul Chirileni, reprezentat de primar Dl Stoica lurie Comuna Cioropcani, reprezentatd de primar Dl Robule( Victor Comuna Condrdtegti, reprezentatii de primar Dl Zgureanu $tefan Satul Cornegti, reprezentat de primar Dl Morari Valeriu Satul Cornova, reprezentat de primar Dl Rogca $tefan Satul Costuleni, reprezentat de primar Dl Andrei Rudicov Comuna Flori[oaia Veche, reprezentatd de primar Dl Mdrgdrint Sergiu Comuna Hircegti , teprezentatd de primar Dna Sirbu Tatiana Comuna Mdciregti, reprezentatd de primar Dl Manciu Sergiu Satul Mdgurele, reprezentat de primar Dl Caldare Andrei Comuna Mdnoilegti, reprezentatd de primar Dna Grosu Valentina Comuna Morenii Noi, reprezentatd de primar Dna Lincovscaia Valentina Satul Ndpddeni, reprezentat de primar Dna Arteomov Maria Comuna Negurenii Vechi, reprezentatd de primar Dl Cozariuc Adrian Comuna Petregti, reprezentatd de primar Dl Gorea
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Proiectelor Aprobate Pentru Finanţare Din Fondul Ecologic Naţional Pentru Anul 2019
    Lista proiectelor aprobate pentru finanţare din Fondul Ecologic Naţional pentru anul 2019 I. Aprovizionare cu apă, canalizare și epurare (inclusiv, Construcția sistemelor de apeduct, canalizare, stații de epurare) 75/03 Suma solicitată Nr d/o Denumirea proiectului Beneficiar Suma aprobată, lei FEN, lei Alimentarea cu apă și canalizare a or. Cornești, alimentarea cu apă a s. Romanovca. Stația de 1 24.960.443.00 Primăria or. Cornești, r-nul Ungheni 10.000.000.00 tratare din or. Cornești, or. Cornești r-nul Ungheni 2 Construcția rețelelor de alimentare cu apă din s.Nișcani, r. Călărași 7.445.290.00 Primăria s. Nișcani, r-nul Călărași 7.445.290.00 3 Alimentarea cu apa a doua sectoare din s. Calfa, r-nul Anenii Noi 2.445.824.00 Primăria s. Calfa, r-nul Anenii Noi 2.445.824.00 4 Constructia turnului de apa si forarea sondei arteziene - etapa II. 776.410.00 Primăria s. Geamănă, r-nul Anenii Noi 776.410.00 Constructia retelelor de apeduct, doua castele de apa si reparatia sondelor existente in s. 5 2.304.905.00 Primăria s. Chetrosu, r-nul Anenii Noi 2.304.905.00 Chetrosu, r-nul Anenii Noi etapa II 6 Constructia retelei de canalizare in s. Bascalia, r-nul Basarabeasca - etapa III 19.709.754.00 Primăria s. Bascalia, r-nul Basarabeasca 4.000.000.00 7 Retea de alimentare cu apa si retea de canalizare a s. Carabetovca, r-nul Basarabeasca - etapa II 17.490.117.00 Primăria s. Carabetovca, r-nul Basarabeasca 3.000.000.00 Constructia retelei de canalizare a 3 statii de pompare si a statiei de epurare din s.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY Finance Benchmarks: Areas and Options for Assessing Local Financial Resources and Financial Management in Moldova
    STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR LOCAL GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME 2015-2017 STUDY Finance Benchmarks: areas and options for assessing local financial resources and financial management in Moldova Author: Viorel Roscovan September 25, 2015 Table of contents 1. POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA ....... 5 1.1. GENERAL DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL DIVISION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS .................................................. 5 1.3. POLITICAL STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................................... 6 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPETENCES ........................................................................................... 7 2.1. LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND RIGHTS ........................................................ 7 2.2. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS .......................................................................... 9 2.3. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS SUPERVISION .................................................................................................... 11 3. LOCAL GOVERNMENT OWN AND SHARED REVENUES ............................................................ 12 3.1. OWN REVENUES ................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2. SHARED TAXES AND FEES
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Ri~ for Human Development
    INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP 10 RI~ FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 26F Plaza Street, N E , Leesburg, Virgnia 20176, U S A. WINTER HEAT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MOLDOVA USAID AGREEMENT NO. 121-A-00-99-00707-00 FINAL REPORT June 30, 1999 Tel (703) 443-2078, Fax. (703) 443-2012, E-mad mhd@erols corn TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Report of Fuel Dellveries 1. Institutions which recelve fuel A. Hospitals ..... ....... 1 B. Boarding Schools & Orphanages .... ...... 2 C. Boarding Schools for Dlsabled .... ...... 3 D. Secondary Schools .......................... 3 E. Nurseries . ............................ .... 21 F. Pensloners & Vulnerable Famllles ...... 21 G. Other ................................. .. 40 H, Total Delivered ....................... 40 I. Summary of Dellverles by Categories ...... 41 J. Coverage Agalnst Heatmg Requlrements .... 41 Repalrs to Heatlng Systems ........... 42 Monitoring .......... ....... 43 Problems & How Problems were Addressed ........... 45 Outstanding Issues .......... 46 Cooperation wlth GOM .......... 46 Unforessen Matters ....... 47 Descrlbe any Matters/Problems Concerning Fuel Deliveries/Fuel Companies ....... 47 Number of Outstanding Fuel Companies Vouchers to be Paid ...... ....... 47 Other Comments ........... ...... 48 ATTACHMENT 1 Fuel Deliveries to Instltutlons ATTACHMENT 2: Coal Dellverles by Dlstrlct GR/AS Coal & Heatlng 011 for Instltutlons ATTACHMENT 3: Coal Dellverles by Dlstrlct - AS Coal for Households ATTACHMENT 4: Beneflclarles ATTACHMENT 5: Fuel Purchases ATTACHMENT 6: Coal Dellverles by Month ATTACHMENT 7. Payments
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for 2009
    Contract number: 2009/219-955 Project Title: Building confidence between Chisinau and Tiraspol Report starting date: 01 January 2010 Report end date: 31 December 2011 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Support to Confidence Building Measures II – Final Report 2010-2011 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4. SUPPORT TO CREATION OF DNIESTER EUROREGION AND RESTORATION OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC. ........................................... 7 IV. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notă Informativă
    NOTĂ INFORMATIVĂ Prin Direcția Centrul de Sănătate Publică Ungheni din cadrul Agenției Naționale de Sănătate Publică (ANSP), Vă prezintă numărul de cazuri pozitive cu COVID-19 în ultimile 14 zile cu incidența la 100000 mii populație pentru fiecare localitate în parte pentru raionul Ungheni. Numărul de cazuri în Incidența la 100 Nr. Denumirea localității Populația Codul ultimile 14 mii populație zile 1 Orasul Cornesti 6 215.7 2 781 Roșu 2 Orasul Ungheni 192 590.2 32 530 Roșu 3 Satul Agronomovca 0 0 769 Verde 4 Satul Alexeevca 4 389.4 1 027 Roșu 5 Satul Blindesti 2 490,1 612 Roșu 6 Satul Boghenii Noi 2 326.7 585 Roșu 7 Satul Boghenii Vechi 0 0 390 Verde 8 Satul Buciumeni 0 0 698 Verde 9 Satul Bulhac 0 0 229 Verde 10 Satul Bumbata 4 167.7 2 385 Roșu 11 Satul Busila 4 198 2 020 Roșu 12 Satul Buzduganii de Jos 3 556.5 539 Roșu 13 Satul Buzduganii de Sus 0 0 561 Verde 14 Satul Cetireni 15 720.8 2 081 Roșu 15 Satul Chirileni 4 200.4 1 996 Roșu 16 Satul Cioropcani 1 63.7 1 569 Portocaliu 17 Satul Condratesti 0 0 1 083 Verde 18 Satul Cornesti 16 785 2 038 Roșu 19 Satul Cornova 0 0 1 129 Verde 20 Satul Coseni 0 0 387 Verde 21 Satul Costuleni 26 835.7 3 111 Roșu 22 Satul Curtoaia 0 0 327 Verde 23 Satul Drujba 3 499.1 601 Roșu 24 Satul Elizavetovca 0 0 269 Verde 25 Satul Floreni 0 0 336 Verde 26 Satul Floresti 0 0 728 Verde 27 Satul Floritoaia Noua 1 229.8 435 Roșu 28 Satul Floritoaia Veche 0 0 920 Verde 29 Satul Frasinesti 8 581.8 1 375 Roșu 30 Satul Gherman 13 751.4 1 730 Roșu 31 Satul Graseni 0 0 863 Verde 32 Satul Grozasca 0 0 741 Verde 33 Satul
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Democracy and Human Rights PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION
    advancing democracy and human rights THE CIVIC COALITION FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION REPORT #3 Monitoring the preterm parliamentary elections of 28 November 2010 Monitoring period: 26 October 2010 – 8 November 2010 Published on 11 November 2010 Promo-LEX is grateful for the financial and technical assistance offered by the United States of America Embassy in Chisinau, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the donors. Page 1 of 28 Third monitoring report on the preterm parliamentary elections of 28 November 2010 CONTENTS: I. SUMMARY II. PROMO-LEX MONITORING EFFORT III. INTRODUCTION A. Legal framework B. Electoral competitors C. Election authorities D. Local authorities E. Electoral campaigning F. Financial analysis G. Mass media H. National and international observers I. Transnistrian region IV. CONCERNS V. RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2 of 28 I. SUMMARY This report, covering the period from October 25 through November 8, 2010, describes the electoral environment and reviews from a legal perspective the recent developments in the election campaign, and the performance of the electoral competitors and of the local and election authorities. The election campaign is becoming increasingly intense, with cases of intimidation and abuse being registered both against electoral competitors and voters. While engaged in various campaigning activities, some candidates resort to the misuse of administrative resources and offering of “electoral gifts”. Promo-LEX salutes the impartiality of the election authorities in performing their duties. The Central Election Commission registered until the end of the authorization period 40 electoral competitors and issued warnings to the contenders that violated the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Moldova
    AFB/PPRC.24/29 26 February, 2019 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Twenty-Third Meeting Bonn, Germany, 12-13 March , 2019 Agenda Item 9 v) PROPOSAL FOR MOLDOVA AFB/PPRC.24/29 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (Annex 5 of the OPG, as amended in March 2016) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernization of Local Public Services in the Republic of Moldova - Intervention Area 2: Regional Planning and Programming
    Modernization of local public services in the Republic of Moldova - Intervention area 2: Regional planning and programming - Regional Sector Program on Solid Waste Management: Development Region Centre Final version March 2014 Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices: Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 53113 Bonn, Germany T +49 228 44 60-0 F +49 228 44 60-17 66 Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5 65760 Eschborn, Germany T +49 61 96 79-0 F +49 61 96 79-11 15 E [email protected] I www.giz.de Author(s): Doug Hickman, Tamara Guvir, Ciprian Popovici, Reka Soos, Tatiana Ţugui, Iurie Ţugui Elaborated by: Consortium GOPA - Gesellschaft für Organisation, Planung und Ausbildung mbH – Eptisa Servicios de Ingeniera S.L. - Integration Environment & Energy GmbH – Kommunalkredit Public Consulting GmbH – Oxford Policy Management Ltd. Prepared for: Project “Modernization of local public services in the Republic of Moldova”, implemented by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and with support of Romanian Government, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and the European Union. Project partners: Ministry of Regional Development and Construction of the Republic of Moldova North, Center and South Regional Development Agencies The expressed opinions belong to the author(s) and do not necessary reflect the views of the implementing agency, project’s funders and partners. Chisinau, March 2014 Modernization of Local Public Services, intervention area 2 Content 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 2 Current situation review ............................................................................... 4 2.1 Policy, Legal and Regulatory Framework ........................................................ 4 2.2 Institutional Framework ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Observance of Human Rights and Freedoms in The
    REPORT ON THE OBSERVANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA IN 2016 CHISINAU, 2017 1 CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................3 Universal Periodic Review..............................................................................................7 CHAPTER I OBSERVANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Equality before law and public authorities .............................................................................9 Legal status of foreign citizens and stateless persons …………………………………...…14 Right to a fair trial .................................................................................................................17 Right to life, physical and mental integrity…........................................................................22 Individual freedom and personal security.................................................................. 29 Private and family life…………...............................................................................31 Freedom of expression……………………………………………………………………..34 Right to information………………………………………………………………………..41 Right to health protection….……..........................................................................................44 Right to a clean environment…………..……………………………………………….......51 Right to vote and right to be elected .....................................................................................60 Freedom of assembly……………………………………………………………………….63
    [Show full text]
  • AWARDED PRACTICES Within the Best Practices Programme for Local
    AWARDED PRACTICES within the Best Practices Programme for Local Authorities in Moldova 2011 - 2012 I. Good Governance: citizens participation and successful community partnerships No. Locality Title of the practice No. of votes Position 1. Ungheni, Ungheni district Access to inclusive education for 6 I 376 children aged 2 - 6 years 2. Calfa, Anenii Noi district Creating the Temporary Placement 6 II Centre for elders 3. Bahrinesti, Floresti district Village with 12 mayors 4 III 4. Calarasi, Calarasi district Supporting local authorities to 2 awarded with develop/update the Socio-Economic certificates development Strategy 5. Joltai, Autonomous Local community involvement in 1 awarded with Territorial Unit of Gagauzia construction of the Sport Centre certificates 6. Vinogradovca, Taraclia Construction of water supply and 1 awarded with district sanitary facilities in the local certificates kindergarten from Ciumai village, Vinogradovca region II. Local socio-economic development: performances and achievements No. Locality Title of the practice No. of votes Position 1. Larga, Briceni district Business incubator from Larga- an 7 I important factor in activities regarding active employment measures of the yeah from the region 2. Cotul Morii, Hincesti The project „A helping hand for 5 II district children” 3. Radulenii Vechi, Floresti Social center for the elderly, social 5 III district canteen for socially social vulnerable people 4. Budesti, Chisinau Creating a recreational area 5 III municipality 1 5. Cetireni, Ungheni district Village water supply 1 awarded with certificates 6. Chirileni, Ungheni district Construction of water supply system 1 awarded with in the village certificates III. Successful models for energy efficiency at community level No.
    [Show full text]