DOCSLIB.ORG

A West Papuan Language of Irian Jaya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

• A description of Abun: a West Papuan language of Irian Jaya Berry, K. and Berry, C. A Description of Abun: A West Papuan Language of Irian Jaya. B-115, xii + 236 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1999. DOI:10.15144/PL-B115.cover ©1999 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIFIC LINGUISTICS FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: Malcolm D. Ross and Darrell T. Tryon (Managing Editors), John Bowden, Thomas E. Dutton, Andrew K. Pawley Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialisingin linguistic descriptions, dictionaries, atlases and other material on languages of the Pacific, the Philippines, Indonesia and Southeast Asia. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Pacific Linguistics is associated with the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at The Australian National University. Pacific Linguistics was established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund. It is a non-profit-making body financed largely from the sales of its books to libraries and individuals throughout the world, with some assistance from the School. The Editorial Board of Pacific Linguistics is made up of the academic staff of the School's Department of Linguistics. The Board also appoints a body of editorial advisors drawn from the international community of linguists. Publications in Series A, B and C and textbooks in Series D are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise who are normally not members of the editorial board. To date Pacific Linguistics has published over 400 volumes in four series: Series A: Occasional Papers; collections of shorter papers, usually on a single topic or area. Series B: Monographs of intermediate length. Series C: Books; publications of greater length, especially reference books such as dictionaries and grammars, and conference proceedings. Series D: Special Publications; including archival materials, pedagogical works, maps, audiovisual productions, and materials that do not fit into the other series. Pacific Linguistics would like to assure prospective Australian authors and readers that it qualifies as a commercial publisher for The Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) purposes in measuring research output. Series B, Volume 115 - -- ----�--------------- A DESCRIPTION OF ABUN: a West Papuan language of Irian J aya Keith Berry Christine Berry Pacific Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies The Australian National University Canberra Published by Pacific Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies The Australian National University PO Box 1428 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia First published 1999 Copyright © The authors Bibliography. ISBN 0 85883 482 0 1. Abun language. I Berry, Christine. II. Australian National University. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies. Pacific Linguistics. III. Title. (Series: Pacific linguistics. Series B-115) 499 CopyeditedfTypeset by Margaret Forster Printed by ANU Printing Service, Canberra Bound by F & M Perfect Bookbinding, Canberra The Pacific Linguistics logo was designed by Ian Scales after one small panel of a poro batuna from Vella La vella, held in the Australian Museum (A8S17). This is an artefact made from a plaque of fossilised giant clam shell (Tridacna sp.), carved into an elaborate fretwork design. These particular artefacts were made in the western Solomon Islands, probably between 100 and 200 years ago. The basic cover design is also by Ian Scales. The motif was drawn by Malcolm Ross after the stylised representation of a design on Lapita pottery found by Roger Green in the Reefs-Santa Cruz Islands (source: Matthew Spriggs, 1990 ed. Lapita design, form and composition. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................... xi ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ xii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....... ......... ........................................ ................................. 1 1.1 The location of the Abun language............................................................... ........... 1 1.2 The name of the Abun language ............. ........................................................... ..... 2 1.3 Previous studies ...................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Scope of research .................................................................................................... 3 1.5 The general linguistic situation ................................................................................ 3 1.6 Abun and other West Papuan Phylum languages ................................................... 7 1.7 Abun dialects ............................................................................................. ............ 8 CHAPTER 2: PHONOLOGy ............. ................................................................... ..... ..... 10 2.1 Introduction ................................... ........................................................................ 10 2.2 Consonants ........................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Vowels .................................................................................................................. 14 2.4 Syllable structure ................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Morphophonemic rules........ .............................................. ................................... 19 2.6 Stress ................................ ................................................................................... 20 2.7 Tone ....... ............................................................................................................... 20 2.8 The orthography of Abun ..................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 3: MORPHOLOGY AND WORD CLASSES .... .......................................... 23 3. 1 Typology. .............................................................................................................. 23 3.2 Establishing word classes ..................................................................................... 24 3.3 Open word classes ................................................................................................ 25 3.4 Closed word classes................................................................................. ............. 38 CHAPTER 4: CLAUSE STRUCTURE ............................................................................. 48 4. 1 Core grammar and grammatical relations .................................. ........................... 48 4.2 Abun and the grammatical relations hierarchy ........................... ........................... 50 4.3 Clause types .......................................................................................................... 50 4.4 Adjuncts.... ............................................................................... ............................. 53 4.5 Particles.. ............................................................................................... ............... 56 4.6 Verbless clauses........................................................... ......................................... 60 4.7 Syntactic information-packaging options in Abun clauses........ ............................ 61 CHAPTER 5: PHRASE STRUCTURE ............................................................................. 65 5.1 Verb phrases ......................................................................................................... 65 5.2 Noun phrases ................................................................................................ ....... 67 5.3 Possessive phrases............................... ................ ................................................. 77 Vll viii 5.4 Prepositional phrases ............................................................................................ 82 5.5 Adverbial and adjectival phrases ........................................................................... 90 5.6 Quantifier phrases ................................................................................................. 92 5.7 Complex phrases .................................................................................................. 93 CHAPTER 6: MARKED MOODS .............. .................................................................... 101 6. 1 Interrogative mood........... ............ .... ................ ................................................... 101 6.2 Imperatives .................................................................................... ............. ........ 116 6.3 Frustrated action......................................................................... .. ....................... 120 CHAPTER 7: ASPECT AND MODALITY. ................................................................... 122 7. 1 Aspect ....................................................... ........................... .................... ........... 122 7.2 Modality................................. ............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • In Antoinette SCHAPPER, Ed., Contact and Substrate in the Languages of Wallacea PART 1

    In Antoinette SCHAPPER, Ed., Contact and Substrate in the Languages of Wallacea PART 1

    Contact and substrate in the languages of Wallacea: Introduction Antoinette SCHAPPER KITLV & University of Cologne 1. What is Wallacea?1 The term “Wallacea” originally refers to a zoogeographical area located between the ancient continents of Sundaland (the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Borneo, Java, and Bali) and Sahul (Australia and New Guinea) (Dickerson 1928). Wallacea includes Sulawesi, Lombok, Sumbawa, Flores, Sumba, Timor, Halmahera, Buru, Seram, and many smaller islands of eastern Indonesia and independent Timor-Leste (Map 1). What characterises this region is its diverse biota drawn from both the Southeast Asian and Australian areas. This volume uses the term Wallacea to refer to a linguistic area (Schapper 2015). In linguistic terms as in biogeography, Wallacea constitutes a transition zone, a region in which we observe the progression attenuation of the Southeast Asian linguistic type to that of a Melanesian linguistic type (Gil 2015). Centred further to the east than Biological Wallacea, Linguistic Wallacea takes in the Papuan and Austronesian languages in the region of eastern Nusantara including the Minor Sundic Islands east of Lombok, Timor-Leste, Maluku, the Bird’s Head and Neck of New Guinea, and Cenderawasih Bay (Map 2). Map 1. Biological Wallacea Map 2. Linguistic Wallacea 1 My editing and research for this issue has been supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research VENI project “The evolution of the lexicon. Explorations in lexical stability, semantic shift and borrowing in a Papuan language family” and by the Volkswagen Stiftung DoBeS project “Aru languages documentation”. Many thanks to Asako Shiohara and Yanti for giving me the opportunity to work with them on editing this NUSA special issue.
  • The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World

    The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World

    Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 177-212 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4478 The status of the least documented language families in the world Harald Hammarström Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig This paper aims to list all known language families that are not yet extinct and all of whose member languages are very poorly documented, i.e., less than a sketch grammar’s worth of data has been collected. It explains what constitutes a valid family, what amount and kinds of documentary data are sufficient, when a language is considered extinct, and more. It is hoped that the survey will be useful in setting priorities for documenta- tion fieldwork, in particular for those documentation efforts whose underlying goal is to understand linguistic diversity. 1. InTroducTIon. There are several legitimate reasons for pursuing language documen- tation (cf. Krauss 2007 for a fuller discussion).1 Perhaps the most important reason is for the benefit of the speaker community itself (see Voort 2007 for some clear examples). Another reason is that it contributes to linguistic theory: if we understand the limits and distribution of diversity of the world’s languages, we can formulate and provide evidence for statements about the nature of language (Brenzinger 2007; Hyman 2003; Evans 2009; Harrison 2007). From the latter perspective, it is especially interesting to document lan- guages that are the most divergent from ones that are well-documented—in other words, those that belong to unrelated families. I have conducted a survey of the documentation of the language families of the world, and in this paper, I will list the least-documented ones.
  • J. Sollewijn Gelpke the Report of Miguel Roxo De Brito of His Voyage in 1581-1582 to the Raja Ampat, the Maccluer Gulf and Seram

    J. Sollewijn Gelpke the Report of Miguel Roxo De Brito of His Voyage in 1581-1582 to the Raja Ampat, the Maccluer Gulf and Seram

    J. Sollewijn Gelpke The report of Miguel Roxo de Brito of his voyage in 1581-1582 to the Raja Ampat, the MacCluer Gulf and Seram In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 150 (1994), no: 1, Leiden, 123-145 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 05:12:46AM via free access J.H.F. SOLLEWIJN GELPKE The Report of Miguel Roxo de Brito of his Voyage in 1581-1582 to the Raja Ampat, the MacCluer Gulf and Seram Introduction For nearly four centuries, scholars of north-western New Guinea have been intrigued by a cryptic abstract of the Relagión que Migel Rojo de Brito da de la Nueua Guinea, written shortly before 1600 by Hemando de los Rios (Zaragoza 1876-1880, 1:187, 11:294-6). The full Spanish text of Brito's Relagión was eventually discovered on folios 139-149 of a Sino-Spanish codex of 1590 or shortly afterwards (Boxer 1950), and was published in 1979 (Boxer and Manguin 1979). In the Netherlands and in West Irian itself, several students of the area where Brito travelled expressed regret at the inaccessibility of the Spanish text. They intimated they would welcome a translation. Between 1945 and 1960,1 had occasion to visit all the places and islands in West Irian where Brito went, and to gain some knowledge of the people and languages of the Raja Ampat Islands. Armed with this knowledge, I have attempted to edit and translate Brito's report. Before going into this further, however, I wish to express my thanks to Professor C.R.
  • Sultan Zainal Abidin Syah: from the Kingdomcontents of Tidore to the Republic of Indonesia Foreword

    Sultan Zainal Abidin Syah: from the Kingdomcontents of Tidore to the Republic of Indonesia Foreword

    TAWARIKH:TAWARIKH: Journal Journal of Historicalof Historical Studies Studies,, VolumeVolume 12(1), 11(2), October April 2020 2020 Volume 11(2), April 2020 p-ISSN 2085-0980, e-ISSN 2685-2284 ABDUL HARIS FATGEHIPON & SATRIONO PRIYO UTOMO Sultan Zainal Abidin Syah: From the KingdomContents of Tidore to the Republic of Indonesia Foreword. [ii] JOHANABSTRACT: WAHYUDI This paper& M. DIEN– using MAJID, the qualitative approach, historical method, and literature review The– discussesHajj in Indonesia Zainal Abidin and Brunei Syah as Darussalam the first Governor in XIX of – WestXX AD: Irian and, at the same time, as Sultan of A ComparisonTidore in North Study Maluku,. [91-102] Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the political process of the West Irian struggle will not have an important influence in the Indonesian revolution without the MOHAMMADfirmness of the IMAM Tidore FARISI Sultanate, & ARY namely PURWANTININGSIH Sultan Zainal Abidin, Syah. The assertion given by Sultan TheZainal September Abidin 30 Syahth Movement in rejecting and the Aftermath results of in the Indonesian KMB (Konferensi Collective Meja Memory Bundar or Round Table andConference) Revolution: in A 1949, Lesson because for the the Nation KMB. [103-128]sought to separate West Irian from Indonesian territory. The appointment of Zainal Abidin Syah as Sultan took place in Denpasar, Bali, in 1946, and his MARYcoronation O. ESERE, was carried out a year later in January 1947 in Soa Sio, Tidore. Zainal Abidin Syah was Historicalas the first Overview Governor of ofGuidance West Irian, and which Counselling was installed Practices on 23 inrd NigeriaSeptember. [129-142] 1956. Ali Sastroamidjojo’s Cabinet formed the Province of West Irian, whose capital was located in Soa Sio.
  • Governing New Guinea New

    Governing New Guinea New

    Governing New Guinea New Guinea Governing An oral history of Papuan administrators, 1950-1990 Governing For the first time, indigenous Papuan administrators share their experiences in governing their country with an inter- national public. They were the brokers of development. After graduating from the School for Indigenous Administrators New Guinea (OSIBA) they served in the Dutch administration until 1962. The period 1962-1969 stands out as turbulent and dangerous, Leontine Visser (Ed) and has in many cases curbed professional careers. The politi- cal and administrative transformations under the Indonesian governance of Irian Jaya/Papua are then recounted, as they remained in active service until retirement in the early 1990s. The book brings together 17 oral histories of the everyday life of Papuan civil servants, including their relationship with superiors and colleagues, the murder of a Dutch administrator, how they translated ‘development’ to the Papuan people, the organisation of the first democratic institutions, and the actual political and economic conditions leading up to the so-called Act of Free Choice. Finally, they share their experiences in the UNTEA and Indonesian government organisation. Leontine Visser is Professor of Development Anthropology at Wageningen University. Her research focuses on governance and natural resources management in eastern Indonesia. Leontine Visser (Ed.) ISBN 978-90-6718-393-2 9 789067 183932 GOVERNING NEW GUINEA KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR TAAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE GOVERNING NEW GUINEA An oral history of Papuan administrators, 1950-1990 EDITED BY LEONTINE VISSER KITLV Press Leiden 2012 Published by: KITLV Press Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) P.O.
  • Journal of Arts & Humanities

    Journal of Arts & Humanities

    Journal of Arts & Humanities Volume 09, Issue 10, 2020: 40-48 Article Received: 06-10-2020 Accepted: 19-10-2020 Available Online: 29-10-2020 ISSN: 2167-9045 (Print), 2167-9053 (Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v9i10.1990 The Codification of Native Papuan Languages in the West Papua Province: Identification and Classification of Native Papuan Languages Warami Hugo1 ABSTRACT This study aims to discuss how regional languages as the local language of Indigenous Papuans (OAP) in West Papua Province can be codified at this time or at least approach the ideal situation identified and classified by the State (government), so that local languages can be documented accurately and right. Starting from the idea that the extinction of a language causes the loss of various forms of cultural heritage, especially the customary heritage and oral expressions of the speaking community. There are two main problems in this study, namely: (1) Identification of the regional language of indigenous Papuans in West Papua Province, and (2) Classification of regional languages of indigenous Papuans in West Papua Province. This study uses two approaches, namely (1) a theoretical approach and (2) a methodological approach. The theoretical approach is an exploration of the theory of language documentation, while the methodological approach is a descriptive approach with an explanative dimension. This study follows the procedures of (1) the data provision stage, (2) the data analysis stage, and (3) the data analysis presentation stage. The findings in this study illustrate that the languages in West Papua Province can be grouped into four language groups, namely (1) Austronesian phylum groups; (2) West Papua phylum group; (3) Papuan Bird Head phylum group; and (4) the Trans West Papua Phylum Group.
  • 'Undergoer Voice in Borneo: Penan, Punan, Kenyah and Kayan

    'Undergoer Voice in Borneo: Penan, Punan, Kenyah and Kayan

    Undergoer Voice in Borneo Penan, Punan, Kenyah and Kayan languages Antonia SORIENTE University of Naples “L’Orientale” Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology-Jakarta This paper describes the morphosyntactic characteristics of a few languages in Borneo, which belong to the North Borneo phylum. It is a typological sketch of how these languages express undergoer voice. It is based on data from Penan Benalui, Punan Tubu’, Punan Malinau in East Kalimantan Province, and from two Kenyah languages as well as secondary source data from Kayanic languages in East Kalimantan and in Sawarak (Malaysia). Another aim of this paper is to explore how the morphosyntactic features of North Borneo languages might shed light on the linguistic subgrouping of Borneo’s heterogeneous hunter-gatherer groups, broadly referred to as ‘Penan’ in Sarawak and ‘Punan’ in Kalimantan. 1. The North Borneo languages The island of Borneo is home to a great variety of languages and language groups. One of the main groups is the North Borneo phylum that is part of a still larger Greater North Borneo (GNB) subgroup (Blust 2010) that includes all languages of Borneo except the Barito languages of southeast Kalimantan (and Malagasy) (see Table 1). According to Blust (2010), this subgroup includes, in addition to Bornean languages, various languages outside Borneo, namely, Malayo-Chamic, Moken, Rejang, and Sundanese. The languages of this study belong to different subgroups within the North Borneo phylum. They include the North Sarawakan subgroup with (1) languages that are spoken by hunter-gatherers (Penan Benalui (a Western Penan dialect), Punan Tubu’, and Punan Malinau), and (2) languages that are spoken by agriculturalists, that is Òma Lóngh and Lebu’ Kulit Kenyah (belonging respectively to the Upper Pujungan and Wahau Kenyah subgroups in Ethnologue 2009) as well as the Kayan languages Uma’ Pu (Baram Kayan), Busang, Hwang Tring and Long Gleaat (Kayan Bahau).
  • Tungusic Languages

    Tungusic Languages

    641 TUNGUSIC LANGUAGES he last Imperial family that reigned in Beij- Nanai or Goldi has about 7,000 speakers on the T ing, the Qing or Manchu dynasty, seized banks ofthe lower Amur. power in 1644 and were driven out in 1912. Orochen has about 2,000 speakers in northern Manchu was the ancestral language ofthe Qing Manchuria. court and was once a major language ofthe Several other Tungusic languages survive, north-eastern province ofManchuria, bridge- with only a few hundred speakers apiece. head ofthe Japanese invasion ofChina in the 1930s. It belongs to the little-known Tungusic group Numerals in Manchu, Evenki and Nanai oflanguages, usually believed to formpart ofthe Manchu Evenki Nanai ALTAIC family. All Tungusic languages are spo- 1 emu umuÅn emun ken by very small population groups in northern 2 juwe dyuÅr dyuer China and eastern Siberia. 3 ilan ilan ilan Manchu is the only Tungusic language with a 4 duin digin duin written history. In the 17th century the Manchu 5 sunja tungga toinga rulers ofChina, who had at firstruled through 6 ninggun nyungun nyungun the medium of MONGOLIAN, adapted Mongolian 7 nadan nadan nadan script to their own language, drawing some ideas 8 jakon dyapkun dyakpun from the Korean syllabary. However, in the 18th 9 uyun eÅgin khuyun and 19th centuries Chinese ± language ofan 10 juwan dyaÅn dyoan overwhelming majority ± gradually replaced Manchu in all official and literary contexts. From George L. Campbell, Compendium of the world's languages (London: Routledge, 1991) The Tungusic languages Even or Lamut has 7,000 speakers in Sakha, the Kamchatka peninsula and the eastern Siberian The mountain forest coast ofRussia.
  • East Nusantara: Typological and Areal Analyses Pacific Linguistics 618

    East Nusantara: Typological and Areal Analyses Pacific Linguistics 618

    East Nusantara: typological and areal analyses Pacific Linguistics 618 Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in grammars and linguistic descriptions, dictionaries and other materials on languages of the Pacific, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, southeast and south Asia, and Australia. Pacific Linguistics, established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund, is associated with the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at The Australian National University. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Publications are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise, who are usually not members of the editorial board. FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: John Bowden and I Wayan Arka (Managing Editors), Mark Donohue, Nicholas Evans, David Nash, Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross, Paul Sidwell, Jane Simpson, and Darrell Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD: Karen Adams, Arizona State University Marian Klamer, Universiteit Leiden Alexander Adelaar, University of Melbourne Harold Koch, The Australian National Peter Austin, School of Oriental and African University Studies Frantisek Lichtenberk, University of Byron Bender, University of Hawai‘i Auckland Walter Bisang, Johannes Gutenberg- John Lynch, University of the South Pacific Universität Mainz Patrick McConvell, Australian Institute of Robert Blust, University of Hawai‘i Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander David Bradley, La Trobe University Studies Lyle Campbell, University of Utah William McGregor, Aarhus Universitet James Collins, Universiti Kebangsaan Ulrike Mosel, Christian-Albrechts- Malaysia Universität zu Kiel Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute for Claire Moyse-Faurie, Centre National de la Evolutionary Anthropology Recherche Scientifique Soenjono Dardjowidjojo, Universitas Atma Bernd Nothofer, Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Jaya Universität Frankfurt am Main Matthew Dryer, State University of New York Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Universitas Atma at Buffalo Jaya Jerold A.
  • Sapaan Kekerabatan Dalam Bahasa Inggris Dan Bahasa Biak

    Sapaan Kekerabatan Dalam Bahasa Inggris Dan Bahasa Biak

    SAPAAN KEKERABATAN DALAM BAHASA INGGRIS DAN BAHASA BIAK (SUATU ANALISIS KONTRASTIF) JURNAL Diajukan Sebagai Salah Satu Syarat Mencapai Gelar Sarjana Ilmu Budaya Oleh : SYANNE TATUTA 100912063 Jurusan Sastra Inggris FAKULTAS ILMU BUDAYA UNIVERSITAS SAM RATULANGI MANADO 2017 ABSTRACT This research is an attempt to describe and analyze the term of address in English and Biak Language. In this research the writer uses Wardhaugh‟s, Ervin- Tripp‟s theories and Lado‟s concept, whereas the concepts relating to the terms of address to find out the differences of both languages. The aims of this research are to identify and classify and to find out the kinds of the term of address in English and Biak language and to contrast them, in order to find the differences. The English data were collected from several relevant text books and some sources from internet and previous thesis about the term of address that has been done before, whereas the Biak language data were collected from informants through investigation. The results show the types of English terms of address have (1) situations marked by status, (2) power, (3) identity and (4) generation, whereas Biak terms of address have (1) addressing terms using name (2) addressing terms using kinship, (3) addressing terms using intimacy, (4) addressing terms using respect and (5) addressing terms using mockeries. Keywords : Terms of address, English and Biak Language, Contrastive Analysis PENDAHULUAN 1. Latar Belakang Bahasa adalah instrumen utama manusia dalam mengintegrasikan dirinya baik secara internal maupun eksternal sebagai individu yang berfungsi dan partisipan aktif dalam kelompok atau masyarakat manusia (McQuown, 1978:171).
  • Word-Prosodic Systems of Raja Ampat Languages

    Word-Prosodic Systems of Raja Ampat Languages

    Word-prosodic systems of Raja Ampat languages PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus Dr. D.D. Breimer, hoogleraar in de faculteit der Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen en die der Geneeskunde, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op woensdag 9 januari 2002 te klokke 15.15 uur door ALBERT CLEMENTINA LUDOVICUS REMIJSEN geboren te Merksem (België) in 1974 Promotiecommissie promotores: Prof. Dr. V.J.J.P. van Heuven Prof. Dr. W.A.L. Stokhof referent: Dr. A.C. Cohn, Cornell University overige leden: Prof. Dr. T.C. Schadeberg Prof. Dr. H. Steinhauer Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6006 Trans 10 fax: +31 30 253 6000 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.let.uu.nl/LOT/ Cover illustration: Part of the village Fafanlap (Misool, Raja Ampat archipelago, Indonesia) in the evening light. Photo by Bert Remijsen (February 2000). ISBN 90-76864-09-8 NUGI 941 Copyright © 2001 by Albert C.L. Remijsen. All rights reserved. This book is dedicated to Lex van der Leeden (1922-2001), with friendship and admiration Table of contents Acknowledgements vii Transcription and abbreviations ix 1 Introduction 1 2 The languages of the Raja Ampat archipelago 5 2.1. About this chapter 5 2.2. Background 6 2.2.1. The Austronesian and the Papuan languages, and their origins 6 2.2.2. The South Halmahera-West New Guinea subgroup of Austronesian 8 2.2.2.1. In general 8 2.2.2.2. Within the South Halmahera-West New Guinea (SHWNG) subgroup 9 2.2.2.3.
  • The East Papuan Languages: a Preliminary Typological Appraisal

    The East Papuan Languages: a Preliminary Typological Appraisal

    7KH(DVW3DSXDQ/DQJXDJHV$3UHOLPLQDU\7\SRORJLFDO 0LFKDHO'XQQ*HU35HHVLQN$QJHOD7HUULOO$SSUDLVDO Oceanic Linguistics, Volume 41, Number 1, June 2002, pp. 28-62 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI+DZDL L3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/ol.2002.0019 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ol/summary/v041/41.1dunn.html Access provided by Max Planck Digital Library (18 Feb 2016 13:04 GMT) The East Papuan Languages: A Preliminary Typological Appraisal Michael Dunn max planck institute for psycholinguistics, nijmegen Ger Reesink university of leiden and max planck institute for psycholinguistics, nijmegen Angela Terrill australia national university This paper examines the Papuan languages of Island Melanesia, with a view to considering their typological similarities and differences. The East Papuan lan- guages are thought to be the descendants of the languages spoken by the original inhabitants of Island Melanesia, who arrived in the area up to 50,000 years ago. The Oceanic Austronesian languages are thought to have come into the area with the Lapita peoples 3,500 years ago. With this historical backdrop in view, our paper seeks to investigate the linguistic relationships between the scattered Papuan lan- guages of Island Melanesia. To do this, we survey various structural features, including syntactic patterns such as constituent order in clauses and noun phrases and other features of clause structure, paradigmatic structures of pronouns, and the structure of verbal morphology. In particular, we seek to discern similarities between the languages that might call for closer investigation, with a view to estab- lishing genetic relatedness between some or all of the languages. In addition, in examining structural relationships between languages, we aim to discover whether it is possible to distinguish between original Papuan elements and diffused Austro- nesian elements of these languages.