DOCSLIB.ORG

CAIDA's Ipv4 and Ipv6 AS Core AS-Level Internet Graph

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Analysis 6000 3000 As in previous years, the IPv6 graph exhibited faster relative growth than 6939 (Hurricane) CAIDA’s IPv4 and IPv6 AS Core AS-level Internet Graph the IPv4 graph. From January 2014 to January 2015, the number of IPv6 IPv4 IPv6 ASes increased by 23% and the number of links connecting them 3356 (Level 3) 5000 2500 http://www.caida.org/research/topology/as_core_network/ increased by 29%. In the case of the IPv4 graph, the number of ASes 174 (Cogent) increased by 7% and number of interconnection links increased by 17%. 2914 (NTT) 1299 (Telia Sonera) While relative growth was larger for IPv6, absolute growth was larger in 4000 2000 of 47 IPv6-connected Ark monitors located in 25 countries on 6 continents Internet connectivity graphs at the Autonomous System (AS) level. Each IPv4: our IPv4 AS graph gained 2,623 ASes and 22,343 links since our 17451 (Biznet) Archipelago January 2015 concurrently probed paths toward 4.9 million IPv6 addresses. These AS approximately corresponds to an Internet Service Provider (ISP). We 2014 graph, while our IPv6 AS graph gained 989 ASes and 4,964 links. 1764 (Next Layer) measurements covered, correspondingly, 92.7% of the IPv4 routable map each observed IP address to the AS which announced it, i.e., to the The three highest-degree (most-connected) IPv4 and IPv6 ASes in our 3000 3257 (GTT) 1500 During a two-week period in January 2015, CAIDA researchers connected prefixes and 89.3% of the globally routed IPv6 prefixes as seen in the origin (end-of-path) AS for the IP prefix representing the best match for measurements remained in the same position as in our 2014 data, but 12552 (IP-Only) there were more changes in rank among lower-ranked IPv6 ASes than data using our distributed measurement infrastructure, Archipelago (Ark). Route Views Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing tables collected by this address in the BGP routing tables. The position of each AS node is Transit Degree 2603 (NORDUnet) 2000 1000 For the IPv4 map, 118 Ark monitors in 42 countries on 6 continents probed Routeviews and RIPE NCC on January 1, 2015. plotted in polar coordinates (radius, angle) calculated as indicated in among similarly ranked IPv4 ASes. This difference in volatility is 20965 (Geant) consistent with the younger and more dynamic growth pattern of IPv6. paths toward 281 million /24 IPv4 networks. For the IPv6 map, the subset We aggregated the captured IP-level data to construct IPv4 and IPv6 Figure 1. 9498 (BBIL) Examining the dynamics of changes in node degrees (number of 7018 (AT&T) neighbors) provides additional insights into the internet's evolutionary 1000 500 trends. Candle plots in Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the distributions of 3549 (Level 3) S B 4323 (TWTC) i relative AS degree changes that occurred between 2014 and 2015. Each n 0 0 a bin in those plots either includes all ASes that had the same degree in 2014 2015 2014 2015 g n a J g 2014 data or spans several degree values to include at least 25 ASes. For a p N k I each bin, the black line in the middle shows the median percentage of o median observed change was a 12% degree increase. The maximum AS 6939 Hurricane Electric remained the largest-degree IPv6 AS, k o N , a r I Figure 1. Coordinates of AS in AS core visualization. change, the vertical box is drawn between the 25th and 75th percentile B k y degree growth of 55% was observed by Bharti Airtel (AS 9498). This large increasing its degree from 1740 in 2014 to 2199 in 2015. The largest e r , , i a values, and the vertical line ends at the 5th and 95th percentile values. increase moved Bharti Airtel from 10th to 5th position in the ranking of relative degree increase in the IPv6 graph came from AS 12552 IP-Only e t , i a T b S h Figure 4 (Left) and 5 (Right). (IPv4/IPv6 Top Ranked ASes) Figures 4 j , l ASes by transit degree. The only decrease in degree from 2014 to 2015 Networks, with an increase of 1281% from 37 to 511, making it the 9th i H T n G IPv4 I e m and 5 show changes in connectivity for the 10 IPv4 and 11 IPv6 ASes that a D came from AS 7018 and AS 3549, both degrees dropped by 4% each, highest ranked AS by degree in 2015. The AS that decreased most in g o E 90E D i were ranked in the "Top 10" by transit degree in either 2014 or 2015. In p , 100E A which had a marginal impact on the Top 10 rankings. In the IPv6 graph, degree in the IPv6 graph was AS 20965 Geant; its 45% drop from 368 to 80E B e C , i the IPv4 graph, 8 ASes increased their degree while 2 decreased; the V S i E 10 out of 11 ASes increased their degree, with a median increase of 26%. 202 removed it from Top 10. , N 10 b la e 1 7 T 0E a d o i u W h v l D o , 0E 2 s K 1 6 u t 0 150 Figure 3 (Left). (Box-and-Whisker Plot IPv6) For ASes with degree less o E b R 100 IPv4 IPv6 k 100 A than 3 in 2014, the same number of ASes reduced and increased their AS , 95% 50 R 50 75% degree by 2015. The fraction of ASes that increased in size tended to E U 0 50% T 3 0 1 0 25% increase as the degree increased. Only 50% ASes with degrees less then o 5 0 k E -50 -50 3 increased in size, while almost 75% of ASes with degrees larger then y U 5% o R -100 -100 100 did. , % change (degrees) , J 1 10 100 1000 1 10 100 1000 w P L E o I 0 c , 4 Figure 2 (Above). (Box-and-Whisker Plot IPv4) For ASes with degree 1 s iv 4 o R 0 v E T less then 4 in 2014, the same number of ASes reduced and increased M A , l a e r their AS degree by 2015. Fifty percent of ASes with degrees greater then S a S T B k A i y 10 in 2014 saw at least a 6% increase in degree by 2015. Twenty five n n U a d A , n A Z g n v , percent of those (degree > 10 in 2014) increased their degree by 22%. e E e a a y i i J g 0 , r 5 K p N A o I a k 1 t I 3 F o U k e o , , 0 r i N a r I E P k k B y n e i r , , s i a l G e t , e B a T b i S h H , j , l a L i H i T f n G m P e I o , a D S w g o E a i 90E D E E s p , 00 E r S 1 80 B A , E 0 18101 (Reliance ) a e C , m 6 W l V i S 4844 (SuperInternet) o i E IPv6 N 0 1 h l , 11 b 2 k a e 7 0 c E 0 o T a 4134 (Chinanet) o T d t E 4637 (Telstra Global) 4755 (TATA ) S A i u W h , v a n l D o E n , 0 7473 (SingTel) 2 e s i 1 K 6 u V t 0 7497 (Computer Network) E 3786 (LG DACOM) E o b R D 24560 (Bharti Airtel) , k n A i 5677 9318 (Hanaro Telecom) l 2199 , r e 12389 (JSC Rostelecom) R B 4766 (Korea Telecom) 17451 (BIZNET) E E U 0 31133 (MegaFon) O 0 N T 3 2516 (KDDI CORPORATION) , 1 5 7 lo o s 0 1 37100 (SEACOM) 3216 (OJSC VimpelCom) O k E 4826 (Vocus Connect) 10026 (Pacnet Global) E 1 D y , U rt 0 fu o R k 7575 (Australian Academic) 20485 (TransTeleCom) n E ra , , 9498 (Bharti Airtel) F J w P L E o I 0 c , 5109 1979 4 3741 (American Registry) s v 12741 (Netia) 1 4 i E o R , B 0 v els ss T Bru E A 23655 (Snap Internet) M , l W 9002 (RETN) a 12552 (IP) e r / a 4768 (TelstraClear) S T E R F ris, k A 3320 (Deutsche Telekom) Pa y 0 n U d A 4648 (Netgate) , 8 8928 (Interoute) n A Z 5580 (Atrato IP) e v , 1 E e a 0 y i i 0 London, UK , r 132132 (MyRepublic) 20965 (The GEANT) 5 K A o I 1 t 1299 (TeliaNet Global) 4541 1759 U 9304 (Hutchison Global) 3 F e , 0 r i 4788 (TM Net) 6762 (TELECOM ITALIA) 4761 (INDOSAT) E P k n 3356 (Level 3) i s 8657 (PT Comunicacoes) l G 174 (Cogent ) e B 6939 (Hurricane Electric) 4755 (TATA ) H , 12389 (JSC Rostelecom) a L i f P 4637 (Telstra Global) o , 9498 (Bharti Airtel) S w D a 3257 (Tinet SpA) ub 31133 (MegaFon) s E E li 7473 (SingTel) W n, r S IE , 0 a 17832 (SIXNGIX) 0 3216 (OJSC VimpelCom) m 2914 (NTT America) 6453 (Tata ) 6 9264 (Academic Sinica) W l o 7 1 h 2 3973 1539 k 1 c 4844 (SuperInternet) 0 7018 (AT&T Services) A 3549 (Global Crossing) 1 l o T g t e E s S A 0 20485 (TransTeleCom) , , P 7575 (Australian Academic) a 6327 (Shaw ) 4323 (tw telecom) T n W 16735 (Companhia de) n e i 209 (Qwest) 2516 (KDDI CORPORATION) V 3491 (Beyond The) 18881 (Global Village) 8359 (MTS OJSC) E D 10026 (Pacnet Global) , 2828 (XO ) n i 701 (MCI ) l r e 9505 (Taiwan Internet) B 7738 (Telemar Norte) 7922 (Comcast Cable) E O 0 9503 (FX Networks) 4826 (Vocus Connect) N , 11164 (National LambdaRail) 1239 (Sprint) 5511 (France Telecom) 7 lo s 1 17451 (BIZNET) O 3406 1319 E 22773 (Cox ) 1 D W , t 12956 (Telefonica) r 0 u f 0 k n E ra F 6 2152 (California State) 12989 (Eweka Internet) 1 2 4436 (nLayer ) 0 W E 852 (TELUS Advanced) s, B el ss 3561 (SAVVIS) Bru 2603 (NORDUnet) W 10310 (Yahoo!) / S 12552 (IP) 1764 (NEXT LAYER) E ris, FR a U P 0 , 8 u 2838 1099 l 1 0 u l London, UK 20965 (The GEANT) 8218 (Neotelecoms) o W n 0 o 1299 (TeliaNet Global) H 5 1 6939 (Hurricane Electric) 3 0 6762 (TELECOM ITALIA) W D u b li W n , IE 0 879 2270 7 3356 (Level 3) 1 A 174 (Cogent ) 1 l ge 2914 (NTT America) s 0 , 6453 (Tata ) P T W W 0 3257 (Tinet SpA) 4 1 4 0 W W 1703 659 0 3549 (Global Crossing) 11164 (National LambdaRail) 6 1 2 6461 (Abovenet) 30071 (OCCAID) 0 W 22773 (Cox ) 0 W R 3 8047 (GCI) 12956 (Telefonica) 1 1239 (Sprint) 5 209 (Qwest) i 0 o W 2153 (CSUNET NE) 5511 (France Telecom) 2828 (XO ) 11666 (Nexicom Inc.) S d U , e u l 4323 (tw telecom) 10310 (Yahoo!) 7922 (Comcast Cable) u l J o W 7018 (AT&T Services) a n 1135 439 12989 (Eweka Internet) o 0 W n 0 5 H 2 1 e 3 1 6 0 0 i W B W r 19151 (WV Fiber) o u , S e B W U n 0 R 1 1 7 0 , o W S W e s 0 4 U 219 567 W 1 0 s 4 0 1 8 0 A S B W 0 , O W W 0 Analysis Team: o 9 i o U W o r J T Ryan Wagner, Bradley Huffaker, kc claffy S t e g , C t s o s a n Software Development: e x a U S t , i i h a r s w o W , Young Hyun, Matthew Luckie A 0 o R U 3 n D i S r h n 1 5 i c R 0 o Poster Design: a n e W , e i , n d a , 0 n 0 Johanna Fleischman o t e n v a U g o C g J h o n a S S W , t o t A n 0 P 2
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2011

    Annual Report 2011

    possibilities ANNUAL REPORT 2011 CONTENTS About the company ............................................................................... 2 Key financial & operational highlights ............................................. 12 Key events of 2011 & early 2012 ...................................................... 14 Bright upside potential from the reorganization ............................. 18 Strong market position ................................................................... 20 Up in the “Clouds” ........................................................................... 22 Chairman’s statement ........................................................................ 24 Letter from the President ................................................................... 26 Strategy .............................................................................................. 28 M&A activity ........................................................................................ 31 Corporate governance ........................................................................ 34 Board of Directors & committees .................................................... 34 Management Board & committees ................................................. 37 Internal Audit Commission ............................................................. 40 Remuneration of members of the Board of Directors and the Management Board ............................................................. 40 Dividend policy ................................................................................
  • Liberty Latin America Completes Split-Off from Liberty Global

    Liberty Latin America Completes Split-Off from Liberty Global

    Liberty Latin America Completes Split-Off from Liberty Global Newly listed company well-positioned to leverage world-class technology, innovation and scale Value creation strategy to stem from both organic and inorganic opportunities Denver, Colorado – January 2, 2018 Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ: LILA and LILAK, OTC Link: LILAB) (“Liberty Latin America”), a leading telecommunications company with operations in Chile, Puerto Rico, the Caribbean and other parts of Latin America, today announced the completion of its previously announced split-off from Liberty Global plc (“Liberty Global”) and its launch as an independent, publicly-traded company. Following the successful completion of the split-off, Liberty Latin America Class A and Class C common shares are now trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbols “LILA” and “LILAK,” respectively, and the Class B common shares are quoted on the OTC Markets under the symbol “LILAB”. Mike Fries, Executive Chairman of Liberty Latin America and CEO of Liberty Global, commented, “The split-off of our Latin American and Caribbean operations from Liberty Global will ensure that this new company will have access to the capital and resources necessary to achieve superior financial and strategic growth. I have tremendous confidence in Balan Nair’s leadership as well as the world-class board of directors and management team we have put in place. As Liberty Latin America charts its own course going forward, it will continue to benefit from its Liberty Global heritage and will have access to key shared services and expertise across products, technology, procurement and more. The launch of Liberty Latin America is an exciting moment for all shareholders and a clear confirmation of the opportunity for value creation in the Latin American and Caribbean region.” Balan Nair, President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Latin America, stated, “Today marks an important milestone for Liberty Latin America as we begin the path forward as an independent company focused squarely on the region.
  • Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 Description Plan 3S DCP & JRA

    Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 Description Plan 3S DCP & JRA

    Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 June 30, 2020 Note: Numbers may not always add up due to rounding. % Invested For Each Plan Description Plan 3s DCP & JRA ACTIVIA PROPERTIES INC REIT 0.0137% 0.0137% AEON REIT INVESTMENT CORP REIT 0.0195% 0.0195% ALEXANDER + BALDWIN INC REIT 0.0118% 0.0118% ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUIT REIT USD.01 0.0585% 0.0585% ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GOVT STIF SSC FUND 64BA AGIS 587 0.0329% 0.0329% ALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTAT REIT 0.0219% 0.0219% AMERICAN CAMPUS COMMUNITIES REIT USD.01 0.0277% 0.0277% AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT A REIT USD.01 0.0396% 0.0396% AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0427% 0.0427% ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES IN REIT USD.01 0.0124% 0.0124% AROUNDTOWN SA COMMON STOCK EUR.01 0.0248% 0.0248% ASSURA PLC REIT GBP.1 0.0319% 0.0319% AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.0061% 0.0061% AZRIELI GROUP LTD COMMON STOCK ILS.1 0.0101% 0.0101% BLUEROCK RESIDENTIAL GROWTH REIT USD.01 0.0102% 0.0102% BOSTON PROPERTIES INC REIT USD.01 0.0580% 0.0580% BRAZILIAN REAL 0.0000% 0.0000% BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC REIT USD.01 0.0418% 0.0418% CA IMMOBILIEN ANLAGEN AG COMMON STOCK 0.0191% 0.0191% CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0394% 0.0394% CANADIAN DOLLAR 0.0005% 0.0005% CAPITALAND COMMERCIAL TRUST REIT 0.0228% 0.0228% CIFI HOLDINGS GROUP CO LTD COMMON STOCK HKD.1 0.0105% 0.0105% CITY DEVELOPMENTS LTD COMMON STOCK 0.0129% 0.0129% CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD COMMON STOCK HKD1.0 0.0378% 0.0378% COMFORIA RESIDENTIAL REIT IN REIT 0.0328% 0.0328% COUSINS PROPERTIES INC REIT USD1.0 0.0403% 0.0403% CUBESMART REIT USD.01 0.0359% 0.0359% DAIWA OFFICE INVESTMENT
  • BGP Interconnection in the Region of Latin America and the Caribbean

    BGP Interconnection in the Region of Latin America and the Caribbean

    BGP Interconnection in the Region of Latin America and the Caribbean Author: Augusto Mathurín Coordination/Revision: Guillermo Cicileo Edition and Design: Maria Gayo, Carolina Badano, Martín Mañana Project: Strengthening Regional Internet Infrastructure Department: Internet Infrastructure R&D Contents Contents 2 Introduction 4 Methodology 4 Stated Objectives 4 Data Sources 4 Data Processing 6 Generated Datasets 8 Data by Country 10 Argentina 10 Aruba 12 Bolivia 13 Brazil 15 Belize 17 Chile 19 Colombia 21 Costa Rica 23 Cuba 25 Dominican Republic 27 Ecuador 29 French Guiana 31 Guatemala 32 Guyana 34 Honduras 36 Haiti 38 Mexico 40 Nicaragua 42 Panama 44 2 Peru 46 Paraguay 48 Suriname 50 El Salvador 52 Trinidad and Tobago 54 Uruguay 56 Venezuela 58 Regional Data Analysis 60 Connection to the Other Regions 62 Conclusions and Future Work 65 3 Introduction Internet development and the quality of user connectivity depend on the existence of good communications infrastructure and proper connectivity between countries. In Latin America, there are still some deficiencies in this regard which result in many people experiencing high latencies in their connections. The main reason for these latencies is the lack of local interconnection between different network operators, which means that traffic between nearby countries must often use distant Internet exchange points, located in the United States or Europe. The deployment of various Internet exchange points (IXPs) has helped improve this situation, although the actual status of connectivity between countries and networks remains a mystery. To find answers to these unknowns, some time ago LACNIC created Simón1, a project that seeks to generate information by measuring latency levels between countries and in this way estimate traffic volumes.
  • Vtr Finance Bv

    Vtr Finance Bv

    VTR FINANCE B.V. Annual Report December 31, 2018 VTR FINANCE B.V. Boeing Avenue 53 1119 PE Schiphol-Rijk The Netherlands VTR FINANCE B.V. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Forward-looking Statements 2 Business 4 Management and Governance 13 Independent Auditors’ Report 15 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 16 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 18 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 19 Consolidated Statements of Owner’s Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 20 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 21 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 23 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 46 1 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this annual report constitute forward-looking statements. To the extent that statements in this annual report are not recitations of historical fact, such statements constitute forward-looking statements, which, by definition, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. In particular, statements under Business and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may contain forward-looking statements, including our business, product, service offering, foreign currency and finance strategies in 2019; our property
  • Notification of Rostelecom Annual General

    Notification of Rostelecom Annual General

    NOTIFICATION OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING NOTIFICATION OF ROSTELECOM EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING DEAR SHAREHOLDER! Notice is hereby given that Open Joint Stock Company Long-distance and International Telecommunications Rostelecom (hereinafter referred to as OJSC Rostelecom or the Company), located at 15 Dostoevskogo st., St. Petersburg, 191002, Russia, has decided to convene and conduct the Company’s Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting in the form of absentee voting (hereinafter referred to as the Meeting or EGM), in compliance with Article 16 of the Company’s Charter, Article 65 of the Federal Law On Joint-Stock Companies No. 208-FZ dated December 26, 1995 and the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors dated May 15, 2013. The deadline for accepting voting ballots: June 26, 2013. Postal address for mailing voting ballots: OJSC “Obyedinennaya Registratsionnaya Kompaniya” (“United Registration Company”, the company running the register of the Company’s shareholders), 30 ulitsa Buzheninova, Moscow 107996, Russia. The list of persons who have the right to attend the Meeting is determined according to the register of the Company’s shareholders as of May 15, 2013. The Meeting Agenda: 1. Reorganization of the Company in the form of merger with and into the Company of Open Joint Stock Company Svyazinvest, Open Joint Stock Company NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Open Joint Stock Company National Cable Networks, Open Joint Stock Company St. Petersburg Cable Television Company, Closed Joint Stock Company
  • Global Pay TV Fragments

    Global Pay TV Fragments

    Global pay TV fragments The top 503 pay TV operators will reach 853 million subscribers from the 1.02 billion global total by 2026. The top 50 operators accounted for 64% of the world’s pay TV subscribers by end-2020, with this proportion dropping to 62% by 2026. Pay TV subscribers by operator ranking (million) 1200 1000 143 165 38 45 800 74 80 102 102 600 224 215 400 200 423 412 0 2020 2026 Top 10 11-50 51-100 101-200 201+ Excluded from report The top 50 will lose 20 million subscribers over the next five years. However, operators beyond the top 100 will gain subscribers over the same period. Simon Murray, Principal Analyst at Digital TV Research, said: “Most industries consolidate as they mature. The pay TV sector is doing the opposite – fragmenting. Most of the subscriber growth will take place in developing countries where operators are not controlled by larger corporations.” By end-2020, 13 operators had more than 10 million pay TV subscribers. China and India will continue to dominate the top pay TV operator rankings, partly as their subscriber bases climb but also due to the US operators losing subscribers. Between 2020 and 2026, 307 of the 503 operators (61%) will gain subscribers, with 13 showing no change and 183 losing subscribers (36%). In 2020, 28 pay TV operators earned more than $1 billion in revenues, but this will drop to 24 operators by 2026. The Global Pay TV Operator Forecasts report covers 503 operators with 726 platforms [132 digital cable, 116 analog cable, 279 satellite, 142 IPTV and 57 DTT] across 135 countries.
  • Report for 2Degrees and TVNZ on Vodafone/Sky Merger

    Report for 2Degrees and TVNZ on Vodafone/Sky Merger

    Assessing the proposed merger between Sky and Vodafone NZ A report for 2degrees and TVNZ Grant Forsyth, David Lewin, Sam Wood August 2016 PUBLIC VERSION Plum Consulting, London T: +44(20) 7047 1919, www.plumconsulting.co.uk PUBLIC VERSION Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 The applicants’ argument for allowing the merger .................................................................... 6 1.2 The structure of our report ........................................................................................................ 6 2 The state of competition in New Zealand ....................................................................................... 8 2.1 The retail pay TV market ........................................................................................................... 8 2.2 The retail fixed broadband market ..........................................................................................10 2.3 The retail mobile market..........................................................................................................12 2.4 The wholesale pay TV market ................................................................................................13 2.5 New Zealand’s legal and regulatory regimes ..........................................................................14
  • Investor Presentation

    Investor Presentation

    Investor Presentation May 2012 www.rt.ru Disclaimer By attending any meeting where this presentation is made, or by reading any part of this presentation, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the following: This presentation has been prepared by OJSC Rostelecom (the “Company”). This presentation is strictly confidential to the recipient, may not be distributed to the press or any other person, and may not be reproduced in any form, in whole or in part. The Company has included its own estimates, assessments, adjustments and judgments in preparing certain market information herein, which have not been verified by an independent third party. Market information included herein is, therefore, unless otherwise attributed exclusively to a third party source, to a certain degree subjective. While the Company believes that its own estimates, assessments, adjustments and judgments are reasonable and that the market information prepared by the Company appropriately reflects the industry and the markets in which it operates, there is no assurance that the Company’s own estimates, assessments, adjustments and judgments are the most appropriate for making determinations relating to market information. Neither the Company nor any of its affiliates, advisors or representatives shall have any liability whatsoever (in negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this presentation or its contents or otherwise arising in connection with this presentation. This presentation is confidential and does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or issue or the solicitation of an offer to buy or acquire securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries in any jurisdiction or an inducement to enter into investment activity in any jurisdiction.
  • STOXX Changes Composition of Strategy Indices Effective on March 22Nd, 2021

    STOXX Changes Composition of Strategy Indices Effective on March 22Nd, 2021

    Zug, March 13th, 2021 STOXX Changes composition of Strategy Indices effective on March 22nd, 2021 Dear Sir and Madam, STOXX Ltd., the operator of Qontigo’s index business and a global provider of innovative and tradable index concepts, today announced the new composition of STOXX Strategy Indices as part of the regular quarterly review effective on March 22nd, 2021 Date Symbol Index name Internal Key ISIN Company name Changes 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD TW01UK TW0001722007 Twn Fertilizer Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD CN0010 CNE1000002H1 CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD TW02MD TW0002301009 Liteon Tech Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD CN249E CNE000000T59 YANTAI CHANGYU PION.WINE 'B' Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD CN1I6O CNE100000HF9 CHINA MINSHENG BANKING H Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD TW025W TW0002015005 Feng Hsin Iron Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD TW505Z TW0006412000 CHICONY POWER TECHNOLOGY Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD TW0751 TW0004938006 Pegatron Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets Diversification Select 100 USD 691316 HK0270001396 Guangdong Investment Ltd. Addition 12.03.2021 EDEDSL STOXX Emerging Markets
  • Any to Any MPLS for Mobile Backhaul

    Any to Any MPLS for Mobile Backhaul

    OCT 2015 VOL. 17 ● NO. 5 ● ISSUE 160 VIP Voices Telkom: Planning for Healthy Development Tech Forum Service Quality Management in PTN and IP RAN Special Moblie Backhaul Topic Any to Any MPLS for Mobile Backhaul Joddy Hernady, senior vice president of Synergy Department at Telkom Indonesia Enrique Blanco, Global CTO of Telefonica 05 CONTENTS ZTE TECHNOLOGIES OCT 2015 VIP Voices Telkom: Planning for Healthy Development 05 Reporters: Liu Yang and Zhang Ying Rostelecom Armenia Focuses on IPTV Services 10 Reporters: Liu Yang and Zhang Ying Joddy Hernady, senior vice president of Synergy Department at Telkom Indonesia DirecTV: Combining Pay-TV with Internet 13 Services to Win More Market Share Reporters: Liu Yang and Zhang Ying Telkom is the largest telecom services company in Indonesia. Joddy Hernady, senior vice president of Synergy Department at Telkom Indonesia, talked in the interview about Telkom’s investment strategy, development priorities, smart city deployment and Tech Forum main challenges in Indonesia. He also shared with us his expectations for the future cooperation between Telkom and ZTE and his views on global telecom trends. Service Quality Management in PTN and 16 IP RAN By Liu Aihua Special Topic: Mobile Backhaul Any to Any MPLS for Mobile Backhaul 19 By Cui Yanyun Introducing SDN into IP RAN 23 By Feng Zhijian Intelligent Backhaul Management 25 and Optimization By Zheng Pan Packet-Based Backhaul for Small Cell 10 27 By Zhang Yongjian, Zou Kaipu and Ma Xin 01 ZTE TECHNOLOGIES OCT 2015 19 ZTE TECHNOLOGIES Advisory Committee
  • Ready Awarded It to Operators by the End of 2016, Whereas Mexico Has Already Allocated 90 Mhz of That Band to Those in Charge of Deploying the Shared Network

    Ready Awarded It to Operators by the End of 2016, Whereas Mexico Has Already Allocated 90 Mhz of That Band to Those in Charge of Deploying the Shared Network

    TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 ITU MOBILE SPECTRUM SUGGESTIONS .............................................................................. 8 ITU RECOMMENDATIONS: SPECTRUM ALLOCATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF IMT AND IMT-ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES .............................................................................. 9 LATIN AMERICA SPECTRUM OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 10 FUTURE OF THE RADIO SPECTRUM IN LATIN AMERICA ................................................... 12 CHALLENGES TO AWARD THE RADIO SPECTRUM ............................................................ 15 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 16 APPENDIX A: LATIN AMERICA MARKETS PROFILES ......................................................... 18 ARGENTINA ....................................................................................................................... 18 BOLIVIA ............................................................................................................................. 18 BRAZIL ..............................................................................................................................