<<

CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24 ISSN (Online): 2455-6076 http://www.cpuh.in/academics/academic_journals.php

Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal : A Study

Saurabh Kaushal

1School of & Management Sciences, Career Point University, Hamirpur (HP) INDIA

E-mail: [email protected] (Received 05 July, 2015; Accepted 18 July, 2015; Published 03 Mar, 2016)

ABSTRACT: Communication is a dynamic and wide process with its ever changing roles of sending and receiving , ideas, emotions and the working of mind. Communication is not only a word but a term in itself with multiple interpretations. Out of a number of forms, there are two very important kinds of communication, verbal and non-verbal and the relation between them is inseparable. Non-verbal communication keeps the major portion of the periphery occupied and in absence of it communication can never happen. In the era of caveman, just using nonverbal communication could help to understand the other person, but in the complex society of today both ver- bal and non-verbal forms of communication are needed to fully understand each other. We start taking lessons in nonverbal communication from the very starting of our life from parents and the society in which we are surviving. There is a very common perception among people that for understanding any oral we have to concentrate and subsequently be able to understand the nonverbal elements, but in reality nonverbal communication is not as easy to understand as it seems to be. Often it is misinterpreted and because of that wrong message is understood by the receiver. Another widely accepted fact states that by focusing upon the of a person we can predict how he/she feels about any situation. But all that varies from context to context, from to culture. Studies in the field of nonverbal communication have well illustrated the fact. Since nonverbal behavior arises from our cul- tural common sense, we use different systems of understanding , postures, and silence, emotional expres- sions, touch, physical appearance, and other nonverbal cues including personality. This paper focuses mostly upon the basic understanding required to be taken into consideration while understanding non verbal elements along with verbal elements in different cultural settings.

Keywords: Intercultural Communication; NVC in Politics; Factors affecting Cross-; NVC in Gen- der.

INTRODUCTION: Nonverbal communication refers haviours such as body movements and positions. to all that stimuli which takes place between people Applbaum et al. (1979) describe the role of nonverbal communicating with each other both intentionally and communication as the major resources of unintentionally. In an intercultural setting, successful people obtain in communication. This view is also interaction depends not only upon the understanding supported by Mcneill (2000), who argues that nonver- of verbal message but also equally on nonverbal as- bal communication plays an indispensable role in the pects as well. One of the varied characteristics of non- process of face-to-face interaction. verbal communication is that it is less systematic than With the development of globalization, intercultural the verbal communication; it is culture-bound and communication has become more frequent and more indistinct. significant than ever before (Wang, 2007). As an in- Nonverbal communication is defined in many ways. ternational language, English has played an important According to Burgoon, Buller, and Woodall (1989), role in facilitating the communication between people nonverbal communication is the unspoken dialogue with different cultural backgrounds. It seems that in- which involves the conveyed beyond the tercultural communication will be successful, as long words. Similarly, DePaulo and Friedman (1998) write as the speaker has achieved high proficiency in the that "nonverbal communication is the dynamic, most- language, namely English. However, it is indicated in ly face-to-face exchange of information through cues many studies that the failure or misunderstandings in other than words". Knapp and Hall (2006) specify the intercultural communication are largely caused by the three major components of nonverbal communication, misinterpretation or misuse of nonverbal behaviours the communication environment, the communicators’ (Arasaratnam & Banerjee, 2007; Ma, 1996). It is, paralinguistic characteristics and the nonverbal be- therefore, important to raise the awareness of the non-

17

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….] verbal communication in the process of intercultural around them. It also involves understanding the dif- communication. ferent , languages and customs of people from other countries. Intercultural communication plays a There is well known saying, “actions speak louder very significant role in social sciences such as anthro- than words.” This statement further reinforces the pology, , , psychology and significance of nonverbal communication. Nonverbal communication skills. communication is very significant and noteworthy in intercultural situations and its importance in our glob- Now as a fact, widespread population migrations have al society is quite evident. In our human relations, changed the demographics of several nations and new two-third of the communication taken place through cultural identities and communities have been born. nonverbal means. Because of the stated fact, the All depends upon each other for different chances of misunderstanding and disagreement re- reasons. Therefore, the better our intercultural com- garding nonverbal communication are high due to munication skills, the easier it will be for us to take cultural differences because every culture differs from and mark our place in international global society. other. Therefore, successful interactions in such situa- Typically more interest is always focused on verbal tion depend largely upon a clear understanding of communication rather than nonverbal communication. nonverbal messages along with the verbal ones. Unfortunately, as a result people make great efforts to Nonverbal communication is one of the key aspects of improvise their vocabulary but neglect nonverbal communication. It includes function, such as repeat- communication cues. Therefore, it is important to ing, complementing, and contradicting a verbal mes- raise responsiveness of the nonverbal communication sage. For example, if a person is saying no to anything in the process of intercultural communication. This and is nodding his head as yes, so in that situation the paper deals with some of the means of nonverbal verbal message is not matching with nonverbal one. communication and ways of understanding and re- As a result, the other person listening will be confused solving the cultural disagreements and difficulties. because there is no coordination between verbal and The main purpose of my study is to examine the role nonverbal means. Apart from this, it also governs our of nonverbal behavior in the context of intercultural social and professional relations, such as nonverbal communication. In particular, the study further identi- cues conveying when we should speak and when we fies the importance of understanding and using non- should remain silent. Finally, it can even amend a verbal behaviour when living in an English-speaking verbal message through mimics, gestures and facial country. expressions, particularly when people do not share the Today the world doesn’t look that big and huge as it same language. seemed to be in the past. According to Y. Wang, peo- Nonverbal communication is hugely important in our ple are forced to live in this global world. With the any kind of social or professional interaction because increase of globalization, intercultural communication people tend to look for nonverbal cues when the ver- has become more significant than ever before. (Wang bal messages are unclear or ambiguous (especially Y., 2007). when different languages are being used). “Since non- verbal behavior arises from our cultural common The term ‘intercultural communication’ was first used sense, we use different systems of understanding ges- by Edward T Hall in his famous book, The Silent Lan- tures, postures, and silence, emotional expressions, guage. Hall has been universally recognized and touch, physical appearance, and other nonverbal acknowledged as the founder and initiator in the realm cues.” (LeBaron, 2003). of intercultural communication. The Silent Language has placed a serious emphasis on “nonverbal” com- Intercultural Communication: Human beings draw munication, and a significant contribution of the book close to one another by their common nature but hab- was its discussion of unseen aspects of human com- its and customs keep them apart. (Confucius) munication, namely (how space affects Intercultural communication is a form communication communication) and chronemics (how time affects that aims to share information across different cultures communication). and social groups. It is used to describe the wide range of communication processes and problems that natu- Now frequent researches in the field of nonverbal rally appear within an organization made up of indi- communication have swiftly increased over the last viduals from different religious, social, ethnic, and few decades, and are quite relevant in business indus- educational backgrounds. In this sense it seeks to un- try, media, international relations, education, and in- derstand how people from different countries and deed in the realms of interpersonal and group dynam- cultures act, communicate and perceive the world ics.

18

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….]

According to Shi-Xu, there are three significant posi- sage was obvious: “Forget all these allegations; there tions that should contain a meaningful measurement is nothing wrong here.” (Foster, 2000) of intercultural communication. First, intercultural Former U.S. president Bill Clinton often bit his lip communication should be judged at the level of social when trying to appear emotional, such as when he acts and not just should base upon language interpre- apologized for the affair with Monica Lewinsky. Did tation. Secondly, intercultural communication is a that small win him the public’s sympathy? socially structured action or message, therefore the (See: www.bodylanguageexpert.co.uk/body-language- meaning of communication cannot be diminished by politicians.html) words. Thirdly, intercultural communication does not make a room in power vacuum. Intercultural commu- The gesture dubbed as the “Clinton thumb” after one nication was situated in the context of imbalance of of its most famous users, Bill Clinton, is used by poli- power and inequality in resources, between the east ticians to provide emphasis in . This gesture and the west, the north and the south, men and wom- has the thumb leaning against the thumb-side portion en, the minority and the majority. of the index finger, slightly projecting from the fist. This gesture was likely adopted by Clinton from John Study of Non Verbal Communication in Politics: F. Kennedy who can be seen using it in many - In the contemporary international world, great atten- es and images from his political career. (Mankiewicz, tion and care is taken to bridge cultural differences 2009) among world leaders whenever they meet so that it could be ensured that nothing is missed, or misunder- The current president of U.S., Barack Obama, also has stood. Cultural differences have significant effects very interesting nonverbal behavior. One of the politi- upon diplomatic . If fail to understand and cians characterized his body language as the follow- appreciate these differences, then it can have serious ing: “Obama is a good speaker, but his stylistic range consequences for negotiations. Successful leaders is pretty limited. His Style lacks the common touch of communicate effectively—not only with their words, Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson, Carter, and Clinton. but also through nonverbal actions. Some politicians That’s a political problem for him.” However, understand the effect of body language on the public Obama’s success in leadership is sometimes attributed and try to use it for their advantage. For example, a to his use of appropriate body language, most notably, politician who stares out into the distance during an- his brilliant smile. other speaker’s speech is subconsciously telling the Studies show that people prefer more attractive speak- audience that he or she doesn’t think that the person ers to less attractive. The other facial gestures that speaking deserves his or her . Even a smile work well for public speakers are three universally can give away a politician’s true feelings. understood ones: opening the eyes, raising the eye- The most effective leaders always broadcast charisma brows, and nodding the head. President Obama, for and confidence. They always connect with others and example, uses each of these gestures, but in particular arouse interest. They show emotions. They are labeled he is a great ‘nodder’. Watch any speech delivered by as “visionaries.” Nonverbal communication has been him, and you will see him at the ends of phrases a critical component of American presidential debates and sentences. This has the effect of affirming through from the very beginning. In 1960, Richard M. Nixon’s body language to what his content is saying. It’s one five o’clock shadow helped make him look pale, sick- reason why we find him so convincing as a speaker ly, and thin. Michael Dukakis was criticized in 1988 and president (Cost, 2008). for his lack of emotion and stiff posture. George H.W. Studies show nonverbal communication is the emo- Bush looked at his watch during a 1992 debate sug- tional meaning behind what is said. People react effec- gesting impatience, boredom, or lack of interest. tively to what they see, or to the tone of voice that is Similarly Clinton’s body language is one of the inter- used to speak the words they hear. Everything include esting fields for political researchers. His nonverbal dress, the extent of physical space between the speak- communication style draws many researchers’ atten- er and audience, hand gestures, body movement, mim- tion. Let me reinforce my point with some examples. ics, and tone of voice can make or break a leader’s Both Clinton and his spouse Hillary were masters of message. nonverbal communication. When accusations were The Factors Affecting Cross- Cultural Communi- made in the media, the president and his wife were cation: Culture directly affects the communication seen holding hands. When the fires of accusation were process in an international setting through seven vari- made most intense, Ms. Clinton was seen publicly ables: leaning tightly against her husband’s chest. The mes- 1. language

19

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….]

2. environmental and technological considera- according to their own culture. This, in turn, may tions make it difficult to accept or even to understand those 3. social organization views held by other cultures. 4. contexting and face-saving 2.1 Issues of Environment: There are five major 5. authority conception areas of attitudes of a nation's physical characteristics 6. nonverbal communication behavior and natural resources which result in cultural envi- 7. time conception ronmental setting. These are: These seven items form the acronym LESCANT. 1. climate 1. Language: Language is most important but some- 2. topography times it emerges as a barrier in an intercultural setting. 3. population size Difficulties with language fall basically into three 4. population density categories: gross problems, the problems 5. the relative availability of natural resources in conveying delicate distinctions from language to These five sources of environmental differences arise language, and cultural-based variations among when people communicate on a wide spectrum of speakers of the same language. business-related subjects. Notions of transportation In English, for example, the mild difference between and logistics, settlement, and territorial organization the words "misinterpret" and "misunderstand" can are affected by topography and climate. prove significant in a sensitive situation because both Now population size and the availability of natural the words carry different meaning and should be used resources influence each nation's view toward export appropriately. Similar example is to be found in words or domestic markets. The United States and China, for “wedding” and “marriage” since wedding is the cere- example, both have massive domestic markets and are mony and marriage is the bond which people share rich in natural resources. Both nations export out of after their wedding. choice and foreign markets in such countries are seen Now dialectical differences within the same language as secondary markets with a cultural emphasis on often create gross errors. One frequently cited exam- domestic markets. By contrast, Switzerland, with nei- ple of how variations within a single language can ther a large domestic population nor abundant natural affect business occurred when a U.S. deodorant manu- resources, is culturally oriented toward export with facturer sent a Spanish translation of its slogan to their foreign markets as their primary markets and the do- Mexican operations. The slogan read "if you use our mestic Swiss market is considered as comparatively deodorant, you won't be embarrassed." The transla- negligible secondary market. Population density and tion, however, which the Mexican-based English- space used also influences the development of differ- speaking employees saw no reason to avoid, used the ent cultural perceptions depending upon how space term "embarazada" to mean "embarrassed." This pro- and materials are used. Thus, how people lay out or vided much amusement to the Mexican market, use office space, domestic housing, and buildings in as "embarazada" means "pregnant" in Mexican Span- general shifts from nation to nation. For example, in ish. many nations the size, layout, and furnishings of a business office communicate a message. The message Finally, national prejudices and class distinctions are communicated, however, varies from nation to nation. often reinforced thorough —the social Much more obvious example would be the contrast patterning of language. For example, due to regional between the U.S. or French executive office and the prejudice and racism certain accents in the United "open system" offices of Japan. In the open system States are associated with urban areas (e.g., a Bronx office, Japanese department heads have no individual accent), with rural regions (e.g., an Appalachian ac- offices at all. Instead, their desks are simply one of cent), or race (e.g., Black English). Similarly, some numerous other desks placed in a regularly patterned cultures use sociolinguistics to differentiate one eco- arrangement in a large open area. No partitions are nomic class from another. Thus, in England, distinct used between the desks at all and no individual offices accents are associated with the aristocracy and the exist. Yet each person in this less open system office middle and lower classes. These distinctions are often is strategically placed in a way that communicates his unknown by foreigners. or her rank and status just as surely as the U.S. or 2. Environment and Technology: The ways in which French individual office system. Thus, the department people use their resources often shifts drastically from heads' desks are normally placed at a point farthest culture to culture. Most people have their own ways of from the door where the department heads can view looking at the environment and they use technology their whole department easily at a glance. Moreover,

20

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….] further status may be indicated by placement near a es honesty. On the other hand, the Japanese avoid eye window. Now if we unaware with this understanding contact as a sign of disrespect. Generally, people then we will definitely misinterpret the message and or cry when they are sad or angry. But the Chi- as a result will be lost. nese, the Japanese and the Indonesians are quieter. In Arab and Iranian cultures, people express sadness and 2.2 Issues of Technology: Generally, cultures may be anger openly and they shout and mourn very loudly. divided into three approaches toward technology: (1) Different cultures assign different meanings to colors. control; (2) subjugation, and (3) harmonization. In China red color signifies wealth but in France and In control cultures, such as those of northern Europe in the United Kingdom it symbolizes masculinity. On and North America, technology is viewed as an in- the other hand, the Japanese assign red color the nately positive means for controlling the environment. meaning of anger and in many African countries this For example, if a road approaches a mountain in a color means death or wickedness. The United States control culture, a tunnel is blasted through the moun- gives to green color the meaning of capitalism and tain. If the tunnel collapses, the cultural view is that envy. In Ireland, it signifies patriotism, in Egypt the technology was inadequate to the task and needs strength and fertility and among the Japanese it signi- to be improved. fies energy and youth. In Europe, black color mostly In subjugation cultures, such as those of central Africa means death. However, in parts of Malaysia, this col- and southwestern Asia, the existing environment is or signifies courage. In much of Europe, in the United viewed as positive and technology is viewed with States and in many Muslim and Hindu countries, some skepticism. If a road approaches a mountain, the white color is the of purity and peace. On the road may simply stop at the mountain. If a tunnel is contrary, in Japan and other Asian countries, it sym- used and does collapse, the cultural view is that the bolizes death and mourning. In Iran, blue color is a very idea of going through the mountain was misguid- symbol of something negative. In Egypt it means truth ed, not that the technology was inadequate. and virtue and in Ghana it is a sign of happiness. Yel- In harmonization cultures, such as those common in low color symbolizes richness and authority in China many Native American cultures and some East Asian and joy and wealth in Egypt. In the United States, yellow color is a symbol of lack of courage and cau- nations, a balance is attempted between the use of technology and the existing environment. In these tion. I have only written about some of various mean- cultures, neither technology nor the environment are ings of colors in different cultures. innately good and members of such cultures see them- Now there are a lot of examples of nonverbal gestures selves as part of the environment in which they live which have different meanings in different cultures. being neither subject to it nor master of it. The “Ring” or “OK” gesture indicates “Everything is OK” in English speaking countries. In Japan it can 3. Social Organization: Social organizations are of- ten culturally determined. One must take care not to mean money. In France, it can be interpreted as zero assume that the view held in one's own culture is uni- or nothing. In Indonesia, this gesture also means zero. versal on such issues which are reflecting the culture's This gesture is used in some Mediterranean countries to imply that a man is homosexual. social organization, educational values, class structure and social mobility, job status and economic stratifica- 4. Contexting and Face-Saving: Communication tion, religious. largely depends upon the context in which the com- munication is set. The more information sender and There are many cultural variations in different social organizations based on nonverbal communication. receiver share in common, the higher the context of Different cultures use different systems of understand- the communication and the less necessary to com- ing facial expressions, colors, gestures, special rela- municate through words or gestures. Communication, then, can be seen as being high or low in contexting. tions, touch, silence, physical appearance and treat- ment of time. Edward T. Hall was the first person to coin the term Even though some facial expressions may be similar "contexting." Hall has divided context into two cate- gories, “High context and low context.” across cultures but their interpretations are different from culture to culture. These differences of interpre- tation may lead to conflict. In Japan, when someone Table.1 illustrates the list of countries according to dies in family, they smile. That means that they are in their cultural context grief. For a Westerner, it will be a confusing situation. High Context Mid Context Low Context In Asian cultures smiling is used to cover emotional Countries Countries Countries pain. Americans think that direct express- Japan England United States

21

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….]

China Italy Denmark One of the most apparent differences is the interpreta- Mexico France Sweden, tion of dress. The message given by polished shoes, Greece Norway for instance, could easily be lost on a culture in which The Arab Germany sandals are the standard footwear. Similarly, a wom- countries an's decision to wear her best suit would be lost in a Brazil The German- culture in which no women wear business suits. Peo- speaking portion ple often struck to cross cultural ethnocentric preju- of Switzerland dices regarding what they believe as proper dress. Korea Thus, a European or American may condemn a Saudi or Iranian in traditional dress. Similarly, a Saudi or In high context cultures, the emphasis on words cho- Iranian may consider immoral the bare face, arms, and sen in general and on the written word in particular is legs of a European or American woman in business relatively weak since words provide only one aspect attire. of the context of the communication. As a result, how something is said matters more than what is actually Some behavior may carry distinctly different said. By contrast, in low context cultures, the actual meanings in more than one culture. In such cases, all words matter more than the intended meaning. What parties recognize the gesture, but interpret it different- is actually said—and especially what is actually writ- ly. During George Bush's visit to Australia while he ten—matters more than the context in which it was was president, he held up two fingers in a . In said. In low context cultures, written agreements are both countries the symbol is widely understood, but in seen as binding while personal promises are viewed as the United States the "V" symbol is a sign of good nonbinding. In direct contrast, high context cultures will, victory, and unity, while in Australia it carries a are more likely to hold a flexible understanding of vulgar, sexual meaning. written agreements while holding personal promises Haptics or touching behavior also reflects cultural to be more binding. High context cultures, as a result, values. In a generally non haptic society such as Ja- find that their interpersonal behavior is governed by pan, touching another person in a business setting individual interpretation (that is, the context of the even with a is traditionally considered relationship) while low context cultures find that their wrong and foreign. The United States itself is a fairly relationships are dictated by external rules. non haptic society, particularly between men. In many 5. Authority Conception: Different cultures often cultures men often walk with arms interlinked or hold view the distribution of authority in their society dif- hands while in U.S., males doing this might be con- ferently. The view of authority in a given society af- sidered as homosexual. fects communication significantly as it reinforce how 7. Temporal Conception: Cultural communication is a message will be received which is based on the rela- also affected by cross-cultural differences in temporal tive status or rank of the message's sender to its re- conception or the understanding of time. Mostly in ceiver. Therefore in a relatively decentralized envi- U.S. and Northern European countries, people take ronment people generally pay attention to a person time as inflexible, a thing to be divided, used, or wast- based on how convincing an argument he or she puts ed. But this is not, however, a universally accepted forth, regardless of that person's rank or status within view. How one uses time, may profoundly affect the the organization or society at large. By contrast, in a way in which social and professional interactions are highly centralized culture, a relatively high-ranking conducted in various parts of the world. Now most individual’s words are taken very seriously, even if cultures fall into two types of temporal conception. one disagrees. The first type includes preset schedules in which the 6. Nonverbal Behavior: Among the most varying schedules take priority over personal interaction. Ed- dimensions of intercultural communication is nonver- ward Hall coined the term "monochronic" to describe bal behavior. Knowledge of a culture represents only this system of temporal organization. By contrast, a portion of what that person has communicated. those who follow what Hall termed as "polychronic" Much of nonverbal communication may be broken temporal organization, ranks personal involvement down into six areas: dress; kinesics, or body language; and completion of existing contacts above the de- eye contact; haptics, or touching behavior; proxemics, mands of preset schedules. or the use of body space; and . Any one of these areas communicates significant information The influence of temporal conception on communica- nonverbally in any given culture. tion is widespread. This is further complicated by the fact that no culture is exclusively polychronic or

22

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….] monochronic. Members of any culture lean to one When travelling to other societies, it is important to direction or the other, although the cultures as a whole understand that there are likely to be significant gen- may organize their thoughts and conceive of time der differences in paralanguage in addition to distinc- more one way or the other. The central issue here is to tions in clothes and ornamentation. In North America, keep alert to communication differences that would for instance, men generally prefer face to face conver- indicate that one culture was more monochronic or sation, and maintain direct eye contact longer. In con- polychronic in orientation, and to adapt one's commu- trast, women often converse standing side by side but nication strategies accordingly. closer together than in typical of men. Male hand- shakes lean to be firmer. North America women usual- Study of Nonverbal Communication in Gender ly are more reserved in their use of bold gestures but Aspects: How does our gender affect us in our inter- use more facial expressions (especially smiles) and cultural interactions? Gender has a great influence on are more skilled in interpreting them. all sides of and raises many profound social matters. In Japan, women most often speak with an artificially high pitch, especially when conversing with men in a There is communication specialization between men business or official setting. This is part of the general and women, men being more accurate with vocal and deference traditionally shown to men. However, re- women with . Research has cent research indicates that the pitch of female voices shown that girls display more nurturance communica- has begun to lower. It has been suggested that this tion behaviour than boys and this would account for a change is connected with the increased economic and higher sensitivity to nonverbal cues (Bullies & Horn, political power of Japanese women. 1995). It has been suggested women’s lower status may nega- Do males and females interact accordingly to different tively influence perceptions of power and therefore nonverbal agendas? Communication between men and hinder credibility and persuasiveness. Although gen- women is considered to be cross-cultural communica- der was not investigated in a study by Aguinis, tion and women and men are from different planets. Simonsen and Pierce (1998), it was found that nerv- They speak as if they have different dialects and ous facial expressions and indirect eye contact hin- sometimes don’t even understand each other com- dered perceptions of power and credibility. pletely. Therefore, in the peculiar situation, what thing helps us to understand the opposite sex? The answer is According to Becky Michele Mulvaney it is useful to nonverbal communication.Some gender aspects of view gender communication as a form of intercultural nonverbal communication are reliable across cultures. communication. First, the author considers that gender For example, research has shown that the emotions of is both an influence on and a product of communica- enjoyment, anger, fear, sadness, disgust, and surprise tion. In short, Mulvaney highlights the primary role are expressed in similar ways by people around the played by communication in gender issues. Second, world. Differences remain in surface with respect to descriptions of some salient elements of intercultural which emotions are acceptable to display in various communication Mulvaney maintain that gender com- cultural settings, and by whom. For example, it may munication is a form of intercultural communication. be more socially acceptable in some setting in the Finally, according to the author gender communica- United States for women to show fear, but not anger, tion plays an important role in developing effective and for men to display anger, but not fear. intercultural communication skills.

In most Westernized countries it is considered normal for two men to shake hands. In some Asian and Islam- CONCLUSION: The studies show that inappropriate ic countries it is considered normal for men to kiss nonverbal behaviours may cause potential conflicts in each other, either on the cheeks or on the lips. Some intercultural communication. Intercultural communi- countries also consider men holding hands to be nor- cation refers to the communication between people mal. In most westernized countries men kissing or from different cultures. According to Samovar and holding hands in public would be viewed as homo- Porter (1991) intercultural communication occurs sexual behaviour (see, http:// whenever a message is produced by a member of one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body Language). culture for consumption by a member of another cul- Islamic cultures generally don’t approve of any touch- ture, and the message must be understood. Because of ing between opposite genders (even ), but cultural differences in these kinds of contacts, the consider such touching (including hand holding, hugs) potential for misunderstanding and disagreement is between members of the same sex to be appropriate.

23

[(CPUH-Research Journal: 2016, 1(1), 17-24) Different Aspects of Intercultural Nonverbal Communication: A S….] great. To reduce this risk, it is important to study in- come a bipartisan weapon in Washington.” tercultural communication. MSNBC.com. 7. Shi-Xu. (2001) Critical pedagogy and intercultur- A culturally-fluent approach to conflict means work- al communication: creating discourses of diversi- ing overtime to understand these and other ways ty, equality, common goals and rational-moral mo- communication varies across cultures, and applying tivation. these understandings in order to enhance relationships 8. Wang, Y. (2007) Intercultural awareness: theory across different cultures. into research. Paper presented at the AARE 2006, Cultural communication research tends to focus on International Education Research Conference. understanding communication within one culture from 9. Aguinis, H., Simonsen, M. M., & Pierce, C. A. the insider’s points of view. Understanding cross- (1998) Effects of nonverbal behaviour on percep- cultural communication should be a prerequisite to tion of power bases. The Journal of Social Psy- understanding intercultural communication because chology, 138(4), 445-469. cross-cultural communication looks at how people 10. Gender Differences in Communication: An Inter- from differing cultural backgrounds endeavor to cultural Experience by Becky Michele Mulvaney, communicate. Thus, the core of cross-cultural com- 2005, feminism.eserver.org/gender/…/gender- munication is to establish and understand how people difference.txt from different cultures communicate with each other. 11. www.bodylanguageexpert.co.uk/body-language- A new challenge for cultural fluency as a guide to politicians.html effective intercultural communication is to generate 12. Speaker.Publiwords.typepad.com/…/the-secrets- approaches of investigation on how people from dif- of-president-Obamas-communication-success- ferent cultures and speaking different languages actu- 4.html ally influence each other in specific intercultural con- 13. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/…/5316916.stm press con- texts. ference The role of the right strategy of intercultural commu- 14. Dane Archer (2001) Gender and Communication: nication is very important in avoiding misunderstand- Male-Female Differences in language and Non- verbal Behaviour, 42mins.Color. ing. Globalization demands a greater need for inter- cultural contact and interdependence. People of this globalizing world are obliged to redesign intercultural communication to achieve effectual intercultural communication proficiency.

REFERENCES:

1. Arasaratnam, L. A., & S. C., Banerjee (2007) “Ethnocentrism and Sensation Seeking as Varia- bles that Influence Intercultural Contact-Seeking behavior: A path Analysis”, Communication Re- search Reports, 24(4), 303-310. 2. Bullis, C., & C., Horn. (1995) “Get a little closer: Further examination of nonverbal comforting strategies”. Communication Reports, 8(1), 10-17. 3. Hall, E. T. (1959) The Silent Language. “New York: Doubleday”. 4. Knapp, M.L., & J.A., Hall “Nonverbal Commu- nication in human Interaction” (New York: Har- court Brace Jovanovich 5th Ed -2000. 5. LeBaron, M. (2003). “Cross-cultural communica- tion: Beyond Intractability”. (Eds. G. Boulder. Retrieved August 1, 2006). from http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/cross- cultural communication. 6. Mankiewicz, Josh (2009) “For politicians, the gesture’s the thing: ‘The Clinton Thumb’ has be-

24