Conservation League

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation League FALL 2016 COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE n3 526: Opportunity Knocks n14 Shoreline Victory n22 Notes From the Field FALL 2016 VOL. 27 • NO. 2 Staff Dana Beach, Executive Director Programs Lisa Turansky, Chief Conservation Ofcer PROGRAM DIRECTORS Hamilton Davis Alan Hancock Natalie Olson Katie Zimmerman PROJECT MANAGERS Emily Cedzo Jason Crowley Berry Sosa SOUTH COAST Kate Parks Schaefer, Ofce Director Reed Armstrong, Project Manager NORTH COAST Nancy Cave, Ofce Director COLUMBIA Merrill McGregor, Director of Government Relations Kenneth Sercy, Utility Regulation Specialist GrowFood Carolina Sara Clow, General Manager Jackson Cauthen Jessica Diaz Nina Foy Benton Montgomery Alison Pierce Jake Sadler Nate Toth James Vardell Development Nancy Appel, Director of Development Kristy Collins, Membership & Events Manager Nora Kravec, Data Manager Shannyn Smith, Senior Development Ofcer Administration Tina Allen, Chief Financial Ofcer Erin Crouse, Staf Accountant Christine Gallina, Receptionist Offices Tonnia Switzer-Smalls, HR and Administration Jeanne Snell, Bookkeeper/Ofce Manager Charleston 328 East Bay Street Board of Directors Charleston, SC 29401 Margot T. Rose, Chair 843.723.8035 Berryman Edwards, Vice Chair Johnston C. Adams Columbia Joel A. Berly III 1202 Main Street, 3rd Floor Ceara Donnelley Columbia, SC 29201 P. Steven Dopp 803.771.7102/803.758.5800 Katharine Hastie Cynthia Kellogg Deborah Kennedy Kennard Beaufort Jef Leath 1212 King Street Pierre Manigault Beaufort, SC 29902 Jim McNab 843.522.1800 Richard Schmaltz Jefrey Schutz Georgetown Charles M. Tarver 709-B Front Street John Thompson Georgetown, SC 29442 David Westerlund 843.545.0403 Stephen Zoukis GrowFood Carolina 990 Morrison Drive Cover Photo: Sunflower Field, Magazine Charleston, SC 29403 Lisa Turansky & Virginia Beach, Editors 843.727.0091 Johns Island, by Dana Beach Julie Frye, Design Dana Beach FROM THE DIRECTOR INTERSTATE 526: THE POLITICS OF IMAGINATION & A NEW FUTURE FOR THE LOWCOUNTRY Dana Beach Dana Beach River Road, Johns Island. nterstate 526, I-526, 526—these three other 526 opponents saw the interstate extension as a numbers fueled a three-decade battle over conduit for sprawl and a threat to indigenous com- I the future of the South Carolina Lowcountry. munities. They understood 526 for what it was: a Supporters were certain 526 would eliminate diversion of scarce transportation funds from prior- trafc congestion on Savannah Highway and Folly ity needs in the region like I-26, and a boondoggle to Road. Some Johns Island, Kiawah and Seabrook serve special interests of developers and politicians. residents sought shorter trips to jobs and shopping in West Ashley. Opponents viewed the new road much Casualties of the Debate—Facts and Logic diferently. James Island resident Robin Welch and Early on, studies and models by the South Caro- Johns Island civil rights activist Bill Saunders argued lina Department of Transportation (DOT) and the that the highway was unnecessary given that two regional Council of Governments revealed that any bridges already connected Johns Island with James projected trafc relief was so modest as to be unno- Island and West Ashley. ticeable—only seconds shaved of of trips from Johns The debate revealed starkly disparate visions of the Island into town. And on some roads, the extension region. Welch and Saunders, along with numerous would have actually made congestion worse. FALL 2016 | COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE 3 None of this mattered, however, because the allure of 526 was its stunning simplicity. Building the 526 extension, proponents promised, would solve the region’s transportation problems once and for all. Alan Hancock Even as project costs soared, from $420 million to $550 million to $725 million, promoters assured residents that the benefits were real, long-lasting and financially achievable. The specter and promise of 526 made it impossible for the community to think creatively about alterna- tive solutions to reduce congestion and make neigh- borhoods better at far less cost to taxpayers and the environment. It was the road debate that ate the civic mind of Charleston. Origins of 526—Annexations and Traffic Congestion Beginning in the late 1970s and 80s, the City of Charleston embarked on an aggressive annexation campaign, first on James Island and then on Johns. For more than two decades, the city approved hun- TV reporters interview Conservation League Land Use Director dreds of new residential subdivisions and commercial Natalie Olson after the STIB vote to withdraw funding for 526. developments on the two islands. Simultaneously, West Ashley became another target as Charleston A $5-Billion Slush Fund and A Power Shift gobbled up acreage along Savannah Highway, up Three things happened that changed the prospects Highway 61 toward Summerville, and out Bees for 526. In 1997, the South Carolina Legislature Ferry Road. created the State Transportation Infrastructure Bank Unlike the traditional settlement patterns on (STIB) to provide grants and loans for major projects Charleston’s historic peninsula—where a dense, inter- around the state. connected street grid supports a mix of houses, apart- South Carolina’s STIB is unique in America. Unlike ments, stores, ofces, civic buildings and parks—the every other state with a transportation infrastructure new developments were single-use residential subdi- bank, a majority of South Carolina’s STIB board mem- visions or commercial pods. There were no sidewalks. bers are appointed by the Legislature—specifically Bus service was negligible or non-existent. The new by two legislators—the Speaker of the House and the growth was, in short, entirely automobile dependent. President of the Senate. Every car trip funneled out to one of three major high- In 2001, Senator Glenn McConnell from West ways—Folly Road, Savannah Highway or Ashley River Ashley became President of the Senate. In 2005, West Road. Inevitably and predictably, trafc jams became Ashley Representative Bobby Harrell became Speaker the order of the day. of the House. Thus, in 2005, the STIB was positioned The Glenn McConnell Parkway, completed in the to provide the biggest grant in its history to build a late 1980s, was supposed to relieve congestion on new highway in the overlapping districts of the House Highways 61 and 17. But with the Glenn McConnell, Speaker and Senate President. the city continued the pattern of single-use discon- nected subdivisions, commercial strips, and “big box” County Considers 526 then Rejects It development. Connections between 61 and 17 and In June 2007, the STIB approved a $420-million the new parkway were non-existent. Trips that could grant for the project. Over the next four years, the have taken a few minutes took half an hour. Every trip DOT carried out the processes required for federal required a car. Trafc grew worse. By 1995 it looked and state permits. Thousands of citizens spoke out like gridlock was unavoidable. Conventional wisdom against 526 at public hearings, and every regulatory called for more roads, but there was no funding agency that commented objected to the roadway. in sight. In 2008, the Coastal Conservation League commis- sioned national transportation planning firm Glat- ting Jackson to develop an alternative plan to reduce congestion along Savannah Highway, Folly Road and 4 COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE | FALL 2016 Maybank Highway. The product, “New Way to Work,” moved forward with the road project. So intimidated proposed a series of improvements that achieved bet- was county council that it rescinded its “no build” vote. ter results than 526 for less than half the price. By 2012, the estimated price had risen to more than As the comment period closed, virtually every state $550 million and no one—neither the county, the STIB and federal environmental agency had recommend- nor DOT—was willing to pay the extra costs. Notably, ed either denying the permit for 526 or redoing the the STIB had reached the limit of its bonding capacity. flawed documentation and analysis. The National The project was again on life support. Marine Fisheries Service, for example, wrote that the Then in August, the STIB board at the request of DOT’s alternatives analysis “prematurely dismissed” Speaker Harrell “promised” an additional $150 mil- viable alternatives like New Way to Work. The Envi- lion when bonding capacity became available. Based ronmental Protection Agency called for denial. on STIB revenue projections and the retirement date Then in 2011, responding to public sentiment, nega- of outstanding bonds, this could happen no earlier tive comments by federal and state agencies, and res- than 2036. olutions by the towns of James Island and Folly Beach against the project, Charleston County Council passed a motion in support of the “no build” alternative pre- sented in the Environmental Impact Statement. That “If you asked me how we won, how we beat is, they voted to kill 526. Goliath, I would say we fought for love. They fought for money, for time, for some percep- STIB Strikes Back After the Charleston County Council vote, STIB tion of convenience. There’s a big difference secretary Rick Tapp wrote the county a letter indicat- in that. I-526 was about injustice. I think ing that the STIB would hold Charleston County “in people saw that, and it made them brave.” default” on its agreement. Incredibly, Tapp threatened to intercept state funds to the county to pay back ap- – Robin Welch, Founder of Nix 526, a community led advocacy group proximately $12 million in expenses that the DOT (not the county) had incurred—unless Charleston County Defenders of the sea islands: (l-r) Bill Saunders, Isaac Robinson, Peter Fields, Greg VanDerwerker, Glenda Miller, Robin Welch, Rich Thomas, Nora Kravec, Mark Essig, Martha Craft-Essig, Hannah Horres, Randall Horres, Joanna Horres, Sarah Horres, Thomas Legare and Bill Jenkins. FALL 2016 | COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE 5 “526 had no value for the people.” Alan Hancock – Bill Saunders, Johns Island resident and community activist The 526 Hot Potato The sustained controversy and inadequate attempt to address the funding shortfall left Charleston County even more apprehensive about the project.
Recommended publications
  • Springbok Drop Yard Wando, Sc
    AVAILABLE North Charleston 2.38 ACRE Port Terminal DROP YARD FOR LEASE SPRINGBOK LN 2.38 Acre Drop Yard 49,000 SF Industrial Warehouse Building is also available for lease CLEMENTS FERRY RD SPRINGBOK DROP YARD WANDO, SC Mike Ferrer, CCIM, MCR (843) 568-3427 [email protected] FerrerCREA.com PROPERTY OVERVIEW ACREAGE 2.38 Acres Approx. LEASE RATE $8,750/MO NNN BUILDING TYPE Vacant Drop Yard AVAILABILITY Immediately DROP YARD $5,474.47 for the Lot TAXES TAX MAP 271-00-01-090 Drop Yard is Lit, Fenced and Paved. CLEMENTS FERRY RD Adjacent 49,000 SF Warehouse is also available for lease for additional consideration. 2.38 Acre Drop Yard Mike Ferrer, CCIM, MCR (843) 568-3427 [email protected] FerrerCREA.com BUILDING PHOTOS TOWARDS Wando Welch Terminal CLEMENTS FERRY RD 2.38 Acre Drop Yard Mike Ferrer, CCIM, MCR (843) 568-3427 [email protected] FerrerCREA.com BUILDING AERIAL DISTANCE TO: Interstate 526 <1 mile Wando Welch Terminal <7 miles North Charleston Terminal <7 miles Interstate 26 <8 miles Boeing 787 Final Assembly <9 miles Charleston Airport <10 miles Naval Base Terminal <10 miles Downtown Charleston <15 miles SPRINGBOK LN LEGRAND BLVD CLEMENTS FERRY RD TO Mike Ferrer, CCIM, MCR (843) 568-3427 [email protected] FerrerCREA.com NORTH CHARLESTON AERIAL North Charleston Terminal TOWARDS Charleston International Airport ★ TOWARDS Wando Welch Terminal TOWARDS Downtown Charleston Mike Ferrer, CCIM, MCR (843) 568-3427 [email protected] FerrerCREA.com CHARLESTON PORTS The Charleston Port is the deepest water in the Southeastern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility User Guide
    NORTH CHARLESTON NORTH CHARLESTON COLISEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CHARLESTON AREA CONVENTION CENTER R. Keith Summey Frank Lapsley Mayor General Manager FACILITY USER GUIDE FOR THE North Charleston Coliseum North Charleston Performing Arts Center Charleston Area Convention Center REVISED MAY 2017 5001 Coliseum Drive - North Charleston, SC 29418 PH: (843) 529-5050 FAX: (843) 529-5010 www.NorthCharlestonColiseumPAC.com www.CharlestonConventionCenter.com Rev 05/2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 FACILITY CONTACTS ............................................................................... 5 2.0 RENTAL POLICIES ................................................................................... 6 2.1 LICENSE AGREEMENT ................................................................................................... 6 2.2 RENTAL FEES ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 INSURANCE ............................................................................................................... 7 2.4 MARKETING .............................................................................................................. 7 2.5 NOVELTY SALES ......................................................................................................... 7 3.0 TICKETING .............................................................................................. 8 4.0 RATE SHEETS .......................................................................................... 9 4.1 EQUIPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston SC - ZIP 29492 Charleston-North Charleston Metro State of South Carolina
    A RENTAL HOUSING MARKET FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA (Daniel Island - Berkeley County) Abbington Charleston Apts 2118 Clements Ferry Road Charleston, South Carolina 29492 June 5, 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Jennifer Wilkinson Steven Shaw Abbington Charleston, LP Shaw Research & Consulting, LLC 2964 Peachtree Road NW P.O. Box 38 Suite 200 Bad Axe, MI 48413 Atlanta, GA 30305 Phone: (989) 415-3554 Copyright © 2020 - Shaw Research & Consulting, LLC Abbington Charleston Apartments Charleston, South Carolina Table of Contents INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 2 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 6 B. SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 9 1. SITE VISIT DATE ................................................................................................................................... 9 2. SITE NEIGHBORHOOD AND OVERVIEW .............................................................................................. 9 3. NEARBY RETAIL ................................................................................................................................. 10 4. MEDICAL OFFICES AND HOSPITALS ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposal I-26 and I-526 Corridor Transportation Demand Education, Marketing and Promotion Plan
    2016 Request for Proposal I-26 and I-526 Corridor Transportation Demand Education, Marketing and Promotion Plan RFP # COG2016-01 Jason McGarry BCD Council of Government 2/24/2016 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL I-26 and I-526 CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION DEMAND EDUCATION, MARKETING AND PROMOTION PLAN February 24, 2016 INTRODUCTION TO AGENCY’S OBJECTIVE As one of South Carolina's ten Regional Planning Councils, the Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments' primary objective is to assist local governments develop local and regional plans within the TriCounty region, as well as providing local governments with planning and technical support to improve the quality of life in the region. The Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments’ (BCDCOG) existing Mobility Management Program (MM) is a strategic approach to managing transportation resources. Because the BCDCOG MM program serves as a centralized system for transportation options and coordinates requests for transportation services, the BCDCOG staff is positioned to provide residents, commuters, and employers of both the I-26 and the I-526 corridor with a menu of transportation services and coordination options. Specifically, the MM program directs BCDCOG and consultant resources to implement the recommended Transportation Demand Management strategies for employees and employers in the I-26/I-526 corridor through education, promotion and marketing projects and programs that focus on the following: Moving people instead of moving vehicles Identifying the travel needs of individual consumers Assisting with the entire trip, not just that a portion of the trip on one mode or another Promoting vanpool, carpool and rideshare matching initiatives Emphasizing opportunities to expand traditional business practices to include programs such as flex time, telecommuting, compressed work week, and staggered work hours Promoting transit oriented developments II.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Directions to Charleston Area Convention Center
    Directions to Charleston Area Convention Center The Charleston Area Convention Center is located between International Blvd. and Montague Ave. at Interstate 526 in North Charleston. Below are directions traveling from the South, North, East and West. When traveling from the South (Coming from Savannah/Hilton Head Area): Take Interstate 95 North to Hwy 17 North (to Charleston). Follow Hwy 17 North to Interstate 526 East (to North Charleston). Take the Montague Avenue exit off of I-526. At the bottom of the ramp, go straight through the traffic light. At the next light, turn right onto International Blvd, the Convention Center is located on your right. When traveling from the North (Coming from Myrtle Beach/Georgetown Area): Take Hwy 17 South to Interstate 526 West (to North Charleston). Follow I-526 past the I-526/I-26 Interchange. Take the first exit past the Interchange for International Blvd, Montague Avenue, and Charleston International Airport. At the bottom of the ramp, turn left onto International Blvd, and the Convention Center is located on your right. When traveling from the West (Coming from Greenville/Columbia Area): Follow Interstate 26 East to Exit 212B (I-526 West, Savannah/Airport). Take the first exit off of I-526 (for International Blvd, Montague Avenue, and Charleston International Airport). At the bottom of the ramp, turn left onto International Blvd, and the Convention Center is located on your right. When traveling from the East (coming from Downtown Charleston area): Follow Interstate 26 West to Exit 213 (Montague Avenue). Turn left onto Montague Avenue. Follow Montague Avenue to International Blvd; turn right onto International Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Way to Work Implementation Analysis
    A New Way to Work Implementation Analysis January 2009 Prepared for: Coastal Conservation League Consultant Team: Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin, Inc. Summary 1 1.0 Background 5 2.0 The Environmental Impact Study 6 2.1 EIS and Purpose and Need 7 2.2 Purpose of the I-526 Alternatives Study 8 Table of Contents 3.0 Description & Performance of Alternatives 9 3.1 Design Principles 9 3.2 West Ashley/Savannah Highway 10 3.3 Johns Island/Maybank Highway 24 3.4 James Island/Folly Road 28 3.5 Evaluation of EIS Alternatives 38 4.0 Land Use, Market & Fiscal Considerations 41 Appendix “New Way to Work” is a series of targeted, technically-sound transportation and land use recommendations that effectively addrress SCDOT’s Purpose and Need for the I-526 Extension. These projects also create better, healthier places and will contribute to the City’s economy and tax base. The construction of I-526 as a loop, bypass highway will not be effective for several reasons: Where Are Problems To Be Solved By I-526? Savannah Highway • Traffic volumes will not be reduced as a result of building I-526 • Safety will not be improved as a result of building I-526 Maybank Highway Summary • Traffic volumes will increase as a result of building I-526 • The number of vehicle crashes will go up as a result of building I-526 James Island • Bottlenecks crossing James Island Creek will not be improved by building I-526 Where Are New Problems Created By I-526? Savannah Highway • Property value will be transferred from Savannah Highway to points west by the building I-526 •
    [Show full text]
  • For Lease 1002 Trident Street Hanahan, South Carolina 29410
    For Lease 1002 Trident Street Hanahan, South Carolina 29410 GREAT LOCATION NEAR I-526 For More Information, Contact: Jeremy Willits Senior Vice President Office & Investment Services O 843.725.7200 F 843.725.7201 C 843.270.9205 [email protected] Gerry Schauer, CCIM Vice President Office & Investment Services O 843.725.7200 F 843.725.7201 C 843.364.2055 [email protected] 1002 Trident Street Hanahan, South Carolina 29410 Conditions and Disclosures BEST BUSINESS The material contained in the marketing package is furnished solely for the purpose of #2 CLIMATE IN THE COUNTRY considering the leasing of the Property described herein (the “Property”) and is not to be used - Site Selection Magazine (2016) for any other purposes or made available to any other person without express written consent of Owner ("Owner") and Avison Young - South Carolina, Inc. ("Avison Young"). This marketing package contains selected information pertaining to the Property and does not purport to be inclusive or to contain all of the information which Prospective Lessee may desire. The material in this marketing package has been compiled by Avison Young from sources considered reliable and has not been independently verified by Avison Young. Prospective Lessee should review all available documents and make its own conclusion. All square footage and acreage should be considered approximate and should be verified by Prospective Lessee. Neither the Owner nor Avison Young, nor any of their respective officers, agents or employees, have made any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, or any additional information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Final EIS Chapter
    CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Summer Flounder The recreational and commercially important summer flounder are managed under the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan directed by the MAFMC (NMFS 2008). The summer flounder ranges from the shallow estuarine and outer continental shelf waters from Nova Scotia to Florida to the northern Gulf of Mexico (NEFSC 1999). Summer flounder exhibit seasonal inshore/offshore migration patterns from late spring through early fall in estuaries and sounds, and migrate offshore on the outer continental shelf during the winter (NEFSC 1999; ASMFC 2014b). The adults primarily inhabit sandy substrates but can also be found in seagrass beds, marsh creeks, and sand flats. They are quick predators, ambushing their prey and making full use of their camouflage and bottom positioning for efficient predation on small fish and squid. Crustaceans make up a large percentage of their diet (ASMFC 2014b; NEFSC 1999). The EFH habitats within the study area support the larval, juvenile, and adult developmental life stages of the summer flounder (NMFS 2008; ASMFC 2014b). 3.8 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION This section describes the infrastructure of the existing transportation system within the Transpor- tation Study Area (TSA). The section is broken down into the following sections: Roadways, Railroad, Port of Charleston, Pedestrian and Bicycle, and Transit. The TSA, as shown in Figure 3.8-1, covers a greater area than the general study area due to the need to analyze the impacts to the surrounding transportation network as a result of the Navy Base ICTF, two existing rail-truck intermodal facilities (CSX’s Bennet Yard and NS’s 7-Mile Yard), and three Port facilities that handle containerized cargo (Future HLT, Wando Welch, and North Charleston port facilities).
    [Show full text]
  • North Rhett Commerce Center 511,891 Sf, 81% Leased Value-Add Industrial Opportunity in Red-Hot Charleston, South Carolina
    NORTH RHETT COMMERCE CENTER 511,891 SF, 81% LEASED VALUE-ADD INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITY IN RED-HOT CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA NORTH RHETT COMMERCE CENTER | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY North Rhett Commerce Center | Charleston, South Carolina Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. (“HFF”) is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire North Rhett Commerce Center, a 511,891 square foot, two (2) building industrial complex located in the rapidly expanding Charleston, South Carolina market. Featuring an outstanding location, the rail-served facility is positioned directly adjacent to the Port of Charleston’s North Charleston Container Terminal and has direct access to Interstate 526, Interstate 26, Charleston International Airport, and the Boeing 787 Dreamliner Plant. North Rhett Commerce Center presents investors with the opportunity to immediately create value via the lease up of the 94,620 square feet of contiguous vacancy, below market in-place rents, and the potential to develop additional square footage onsite. Further adding to the upside potential, North Rhett stands to benefit dramatically from the $2.0 billion Port of Charleston expansion set to be completed in 2019, a project that will deepen the channel to 52' and create INVESTMENT SUMMARY a new terminal and railhead only four miles from North Rhett. ADDRESS 5801 North Rhett Avenue FEATURING 81.5% OCCUPANCY, NORTH RHETT COMMERCE CENTER Hanahan, South Carolina PRESENTS AN INCREDIBLY RARE OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE A TOTAL SIZE 511,891 SF VALUE-ADD, PORT-ADJACENT INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATED WITHIN BUILDING I 313,823 SF THE RAPIDLY EXPANDING CHARLESTON, SC MARKET. BUILDING II 198,068 SF North Rhett Commerce Center is strategically positioned on an irreplaceable TOTAL ACREAGE 34.14 Acres 34-acre site and possesses institutional quality features throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Hurricane Evacuation Operations
    Best Practices for Road Weather Management South Carolina Hurricane Evacuation Operations In September 1999 roughly three million people were evacuated from coastal areas in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina prior to landfall of Hurricane Floyd. Over 500,000 South Carolinians evacuated from six coastal counties. Because managers with the South Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) and the South Carolina Department of Public Safety had not agreed on a lane reversal plan prior to Hurricane Floyd, contraflow (i.e., lane reversal) was not employed during the evacuation. Consequently, there was severe congestion on Interstate 26 between Charleston and Columbia. Traffic and emergency managers quickly developed a contraflow plan for reentry operations after the hurricane. System Components: Managers utilized storm track, wind speed, and precipitation forecast data in combination with population density and topographic information to identify areas threatened by storm surge and inland flooding. Emergency managers consulted various information sources including the National Weather Service, the National Hurricane Center, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as well as decision support applications such as HURREVAC (www.hurrevac.com) and HurrTrak (www.weathergraphics.com/ht/). Traffic managers monitored traffic flow with two permanent vehicle detection sites along the highway and portable detection equipment on other road facilities. During reentry operations, portable Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) and Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) transmitters were positioned along the interstate to alert drivers of contraflow operations. System Operations: DOT managers worked closely with Highway Patrol personnel during evacuation and reentry operations. Traffic and emergency managers also coordinated with other local, state, and federal agencies. Before traffic flow on westbound lanes could be reversed for reentry (i.e., contraflowed from Columbia to Charleston), DOT and DPS personnel were mobilized and equipment was prepositioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Plan Update
    2020 SOUTH CAROLINA STATEWIDE FREIGHT PLAN UPDATE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 FAST Act and the South Carolina Statewide Freight Plan ................................................................. 1 1.2 Freight Transportation Goals and Objectives for South Carolina ..................................................... 3 1.3 Stakeholder Input ............................................................................................................................. 5 Survey Audience .................................................................................................................. 6 Survey Structure .................................................................................................................. 7 Respondent Demographics.................................................................................................. 7 Survey Highlights ................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.4.1 Freight Infrastructure ................................................................................. 7 1.3.4.2 Truck Parking .............................................................................................. 9 1.3.4.3 Freight Survey Interactive Map ................................................................ 10 1.4 Freight Advisory Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection & Public Input
    “Inviting citizens’ opinions, like informing them, can be a legitimate step toward their full participation.” -- Sherry Arnstein, A Ladder of Citizen Participation CHAPTER 2 DATA COLLECTION & PUBLIC INPUT PEOPLE 2 PARKS IMPLEMENTATION STUDY 2016 | 23 OVERVIEW OF DATA SOURCES The Charleston County People 2 Parks Plan combines, updates, and refines previous recommendations for sidewalk, bikeways, and greenways to present the proposed walking and bicycling network herein. It builds upon recommendations for walking and bicycling connections made in the 2006 Charleston County Comprehensive Greenbelt Plan, the 2013 Charleston County Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, and other localized walking and bicycling planning efforts by reevaluating these previously identified connections and infrastructure recommendations as constituting best practices, and refining these existing connections based on input from project stakeholders including County representatives, representatives from County jurisdictions, and the public. A summary of these input sources is provided in this chapter. A BICYCLIST TAKING IN THE VIEW FROM THE RAVENEL BRIDGE 24 | CHARLESTON COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS Introduction Table 2.1 This section provides a summary of recent bicycle, Summary table of local and regional planning-related efforts pedestrian, and trail planning-related efforts in Charleston, South Carolina. Nine relevant plans exist. The nine plans Plan Agency Year reviewed are listed in the table
    [Show full text]