DOCSLIB.ORG

PPI-005107-6 Rqtsmantoollist RSK/BP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Tool Name Website Comments (if any) http://www.accept360.com/solutions/accept360- Accept 360 Includes RM functionality requirements/ Acclaro http://www.dfss-software.com/dfss_specs.asp DFSS tool with RM functionality Accompa http://www.accompa.com/ RM tool Accord ReMa http://www.accord-soft.com/rema.html RM tool Acunote http://www.acunote.com/ Agile Agile-Designer http://www.agile-designer.com/ Test Design Tool with RM functionality https://software.microfocus.com/en- Agile Manager us/products/agile-project-management-software- Agile and RM development/overview Agilio http://www.agiloforscrum.com/ Agile Agosense.fidelia https://agosense.com/en/products/agosensefidelia/ RM A-Ha http://www.aha.io/ Project Planning/Tracker tool with RM functionality Aligned Elements http://www.aligned.ch/features RM tool – focus on medical device documentation https://software.microfocus.com/en-us/products/alm- ALM Octane RM, Agile, DevOps, Testing + octane/overview aNimble http://sourceforge.net/projects/nimble/ RM tool (open source) PPI-005107-6-5 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 11 of 14of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont. Tool Name Website Comments (if any) https://software.microfocus.com/en- Application Lifecycle Management Complete us/products/application-lifecycle- ALM tool with RM functionality management/overview/ Aras http://www.aras.com/ PLM inc. RM ARCWAY Cockpit http://www.arcway.com/ Includes RM functionality An MBSE tool used to model requirements. Includes Atego Modeler http://www.aonix.com/stp.html RM functionality. http://www.microfocus.com/products/requirements- Atlas Agile management/atlas/ Avenqo http://www.avenqo.com/ Includes RM functionality Axosoft http://www.axosoft.com/ Agile Tool with RM functionality Balsamiq http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups RD, UI Mockup Blueprint Reqs Cntr 2010 http://www.blueprintsys.com/products/ RM tool BusinessOptix https://www.businessoptix.com/ Visual Modeling https://www.ca.com/us/products/ca-agile- CA Agile Central Agile Tool with RM functionality central.html#features http://www.borland.com/Products/Requirements- Complete requirements solution ensuring compliance Caliber-RM Management/Caliber and alignment of development to needs PPI-005107-6 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 2 of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont. Tool Name Website Comments (if any) Cameo™ Requirements+ https://www.magicdraw.com/cameoreq Part of the NoMagic Cameo™ suite Capstera http://www.capstera.com/tour/ Business Analysis tool with RM functionality CASE Spec http://visualtracespec.com/ Includes RM functionality CaseComplete http://www.casecomplete.com/ Visual Modeling, RM, UI Mockup Application Lifecycle Management which includes RM Code Beamer http://intland.com/ functionality Cognition Cockpit http://www.cognition.us/cockpit_overview.html Includes RM functionality Contour http://www.jamasoftware.com/solution/ JAMA Product Delivery Platform includes RM tool CORE http://www.vitechcorp.com/ Includes RM functionality Cradle http://www.threesl.com/ Includes RM functionality, PM, Visual Modeling http://www.techexcel.com/products/devsuite/devspe DevSpec RM tool c.html https://www.microfocus.com/products/dimensions- Dimensions RM Comprehensive web-based requirements management rm/ http://www.critical-logic.com/products/direct-to-test- Direct-to-Test Requirements Modeling tool with RM functionality dtt/ http://www- DOORS Market Leader 01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/doors/productline/ Application Lifecycle Management tool which includes Dynatrace http://www.dynatrace.com/en/index.html RM functionality PPI-005107-6 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 3 of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont. Tool Name Website Comments (if any) Enfocus Solutions http://enfocussolutions.com/ RM plus Business Analysis framework https://www.3ds.com/products- Enovia 3DExperience services/enovia/disciplines/strategic-customer- RM in suite of tools relationships/tag/3677-230/ http://www.sparxsystems.com/platforms/requiremen Enterprise Architect ts_management.html?gclid=CL- Includes RM functionality amd Visiual Modeling rzfX24aoCFUjt7QodfQ6o7A Envision VIP http://www.future-tech.com/requirements.html Business Analysis SW with RM functionality Focal Point https://teamblue.unicomsi.com/products/focal-point/ Visual Modeling, Product Management FogBugz http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/ Project Tracker with RM functionality GatherSpace http://www.gatherspace.com/ RA & RM tool for Agile Genesys http://www.vitechcorp.com/products/genesys.shtml MBSE tool which includes RM functionality GMARC http://www.informeng.com/itmidx1.htm RA & RM toolset http://www.altreonic.com/sites/default/files/Brochur GoedelWorks Includes RM functionality e%20GW_0.pdf https://www.perforce.com/products/helix- HelixRM Complete RM tool requirements-management HP Agile Manager https://www.pronq.com/software/agile-manager Agile Project Management Tool with RM functionality PPI-005107-6 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 4 of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont. Tool Name Website Comments (if any) iConcur Axiom http://www.iconcur-software.com/index.html RM tool Innoslate https://www.innoslate.com/ RM Tool. Also can be used for MBSE. https://www.mid.de/download/innovator- Innovator for Businss Analysts Visual Modeling and RM downloads/innovator-business-analyst http://www.microtool.de/en/project-planning-with-in- step-red/ In-Step BLUE Includes RM functionality http://www.microtool.de/en/in-step-blue-project- management-software/ inteGREAT http://www.modernrequirements.com/integreat/ Includes RM functionality https://www.ptc.com/en/products/plm/plm- Integrity Lifecycle Manager Agile requirements and test management products/integrity-lifecycle-manager iPlan http://www.iplanenterprise.com/ Project Planning Framework with RM Functionality iRise http://www.irise.com Includes RA & RM functionality IRqA http://www.visuresolutions.com/inicio RM tool plus basic modeling JAMA https://www.jamasoftware.com/ RM and testing This low cost product has been used for requirements management in small agile projects, sometimes JIRA Software http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/overview integrated with Confluence (an editor which can integrate JIRA with MS Office). PPI-005107-6 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 5 of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont. Tool Name Website Comments (if any) http://jucmnav.softwareengineering.ca/ucm/bin/view jUCMNav Free tool for the User Requirements Notation (URN) /ProjetSEG/WebHome KanBan Flow https://kanbanflow.com/ Agile KanBan Tool https://kanbantool.com/ Agile Application Lifecycle Management tool with RM Kovair ALM Studio http://www.kovair.com/alm-studio/ functionality LeanKit https://leankit.com/ Agile LeapSE http://www.leapse.com/index.htm RA and RM tool Lighthouse RM http://www.workspace.com/ Includes RM functionality LiteRM http://www.literm.com/ RM Tool MAC A&D: http://www.excelsoftware.com/maca&dproducts Mac A&D & Win A&D Includes RM functionality WIN A&D: http://www.excelsoftware.com/wina&dproducts MagicDraw https://www.nomagic.com/products/magicdraw Visual Modeling Provides access to DOORS objects in the Eclipse MDConnect for DOORS http://sodius.com/products-overview/dxl-editor environment http://www.powertest.com/software-requirements- Micro Focus Optimal Trace definition-management-micro-focus-optimal- RM and RA trace.html PPI-005107-6 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 6 of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont. Tool Name Website Comments (if any) Mingle http://www.thoughtworks.com/mingle/ Project Management Tool with RM functionality https://www.modeliosoft.com/en/products/solutions/ Modelio Requirement Analyst Includes RM functionality solutions-business-architects.html https://www.modernrequirements.com/modern- Modern Requirements 4TFS RM, RD, Visual Modeling requirements4tfs/ Intended for use with Simulink®, Stateflow®, and code http://www.monkeyproofsolutions.nl/en/products/m MonkeyProof Requirements Manager generation tools, however, can be used more onkeyproof-requirements-manager generally. MooD Platform https://www.moodinternational.com/ Business Modeling Purpose-built Planning Language requirements Needs & Means https://www.needsandmeans.com/ authoring and management applications http://www.microtool.de/en/objectif-rm-tool-for- ObjectiF RM Visual Modeling, RM requirements-engineering/ http://www.microtool.de/objectif/en/anforderung.as ObjectiF RPM Visual Modeling, RM, Project Management and Agile p?call=en Objectiver http://www.objectiver.com/ RM plus RA OneDesk Enterprise Social Suite http://www.onedesk.com/ Includes RM functionality Open Project https://www.openproject.org/ Agile Open Source Requirements Management Tool http://sourceforge.net/projects/osrmt/ RM tool (open source) (OSRMT) Open Source RM http://sourceforge.net/projects/osrmt/ Open source RM tool PPI-005107-6 www.ppi-int.com © Copyright Project Performance (Australia) Pty Ltd 2012-2018 Page 7 of 14 Project Performance International Requirements Management Tools List Cont.
Recommended publications
  • Project Management Software March 2019

    Project Management Software March 2019

    PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE MARCH 2019 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining Project Management Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 22 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis minimum qualifying score of 3.96 Tis a data-driven assessment for Usability and 3.91 for User identifying products in the Project Recommended, while the Small Management software market that Vendor graphic had a minimum offer the best capability and value qualifying score of 4.55 for Usability for small businesses. For a given and 4.38 for User Recommended. market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) To be considered for the Project and User Recommended (y-axis). Management FrontRunners, a FrontRunners then plots 10-15 product needed a minimum of 20 products each on a Small Vendor user reviews published within 18 and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, months of the evaluation period. based on vendor business size, per Products needed a minimum user category. rating score of 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both In the Project Management the Small and Enterprise graphics. FrontRunners infographic, the Enterprise Vendor graphic had a 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE roject management software and document management, as well Phelps organizations manage as at least one of the following: time and deliver projects on time, on tracking, budgeting, and resource budget and within scope.
  • Software Development Process Improvements - Case QPR Software Plc

    Software Development Process Improvements - Case QPR Software Plc

    Software development process improvements - Case QPR Software Plc Lidia Zalevskaya Master’s Thesis Degree Programme in Information Systems Management 2019 Abstract Date: 2019.11.24 Author(s) Lidia Zalevskaya Degree programme Information Systems Management, Master’s Degree Thesis title Number of pages and appendix pages Software development process improvements - 98 + 26 Case QPR Software Plc Initially this study was planned as an effort to improve on a software development process within an existing team using an existing product code and systems. However, the situation changed and a new team (DevApps team) was established and given a new project, which created an opportunity to build a new type of team, product, process, and tools pipeline from scratch utilizing the improvement ideas. An Action Research framework was adopted as the theoretical approach for the study, while the Scrum methodology served as a framework for the development practices. The study began by summarizing previously identified problems in the software development process at QPR Software Plc and formulating improvement ideas focused on the coding workflow and Scrum practices. These were then tested in practice by the new DevApps scrum team. The research analysis centres on the process of choosing and setting up the new team’s development tools, figuring out ways of working, and implementing several iterations to find the best suitable development process. The most valuable empirical outcomes were the creation of a branching strategy and Git workflow for the DevApps team, the team members’ practical experience of working with Git and with the Azure DevOps developer services. A key outcome was the shift in many verification activities to earlier phases.
  • Create a Pull Request in Bitbucket

    Create a Pull Request in Bitbucket

    Create A Pull Request In Bitbucket Waverley is unprofitably bombastic after longsome Joshuah swings his bentwood bounteously. Despiteous Hartwell fathomsbroaches forcibly. his advancements institutionalized growlingly. Barmiest Heywood scandalize some dulocracy after tacit Peyter From an effect is your own pull remote repo bitbucket create the event handler, the bitbucket opens the destination branch for a request, if i am facing is Let your pet see their branches, commit messages, and pull requests in context with their Jira issues. You listen also should the Commits tab at the top gave a skill request please see which commits are included, which provide helpful for reviewing big pull requests. Keep every team account to scramble with things, like tablet that pull then got approved, when the build finished, and negotiate more. Learn the basics of submitting a on request, merging, and more. Now we made ready just send me pull time from our seven branch. Awesome bitbucket cloud servers are some nifty solutions when pull request a pull. However, that story ids will show in the grasp on all specified stories. Workzone can move the trust request automatically when appropriate or a percentage of reviewers have approved andor on successful build results. To cost up the webhook and other integration parameters, you need two set although some options in Collaborator and in Bitbucket. Go ahead but add a quote into your choosing. If you delete your fork do you make a saw, the receiver can still decline your request ask the repository to pull back is gone. Many teams use Jira as the final source to truth of project management.
  • Discovering Community Patterns in Open-Source: a Systematic Approach and Its Evaluation

    Discovering Community Patterns in Open-Source: a Systematic Approach and Its Evaluation

    Empirical Software Engineering https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9659-9 Discovering community patterns in open-source: a systematic approach and its evaluation Damian A. Tamburri1 · Fabio Palomba2 · Alexander Serebrenik3 · Andy Zaidman4 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract “There can be no vulnerability without risk; there can be no community without vulnerability; there can be no peace, and ultimately no life, without community.” - [M. Scott Peck] The open-source phenomenon has reached the point in which it is virtually impossible to find large applications that do not rely on it. Such grand adoption may turn into a risk if the community regulatory aspects behind open-source work (e.g., contribution guidelines or release schemas) are left implicit and their effect untracked. We advocate the explicit study and automated support of such aspects and propose YOSHI (Yielding Open-Source Health Information), a tool able to map open-source communities onto community patterns,sets of known organisational and social structure types and characteristics with measurable core attributes. This mapping is beneficial since it allows, for example, (a) further investigation of community health measuring established characteristics from organisations research, (b) reuse of pattern-specific best-practices from the same literature, and (c) diagnosis of organ- isational anti-patterns specific to open-source, if any. We evaluate the tool in a quantitative empirical study involving 25 open-source communities from GitHub, finding that the tool offers a valuable basis to monitor key community traits behind open-source development and may form an effective combination with web-portals such as OpenHub or Bitergia. We made the proposed tool open source and publicly available.
  • Atlassian: Analysis and Strategic Recommendation

    Atlassian: Analysis and Strategic Recommendation

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2017 Atlassian: Analysis and strategic recommendation Ryann M. Carlson University of Montana, Missoula, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Part of the Strategic Management Policy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Carlson, Ryann M., "Atlassian: Analysis and strategic recommendation" (2017). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 167. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/167 This Professional Paper is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ATLASSIAN: ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATION By RYANN MARIE CARLSON Undergraduate Professional Paper presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the University Scholar distinction Davidson Honors College University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2017 Approved by: Suzanne Tilleman, Ph.D., Faculty Mentor Management and Marketing Department, School of Business Administration ABSTRACT Carlson, Ryann, B.S., May 2017 Management Information Systems Atlassian: Analysis and strategic recommendation Faculty Mentor: Suzanne Tilleman, Ph.D. This research consists of an external and internal analysis of, as well as a strategic recommendation for Atlassian, an Australian software company. The external analysis will use various frameworks to analyze the following: changes and trends in the environment, Porter’s Five Forces industry analysis, competitor analysis, industry segmentation and demand issues and opportunities in the industry. The internal analysis will use various frameworks to perform an internal resource assessment, financial resources assessment and assessment of opportunities for the company.
  • Spiraplan External Bug Tracking Integration Guide

    Spiraplan External Bug Tracking Integration Guide

    SpiraTest / SpiraTeam / SpiraPlan® | External Bug-Tracking Integration Guide Inflectra Corporation Date: July 8th, 2019 Contents Introduction SpiraTest® provides an integrated, holistic Introduction ........................................... 1 Quality Assurance (QA) management solution that manages requirements, tests and incidents 1. Setting up Data Synchronization ...... 2 in one environment, with complete traceability from inception to completion. 2. Using SpiraTeam with JIRA 5+ ........ 9 SpiraTeam® is an integrated Application 3. Using SpiraTeam with JIRA 3 / 4.... 34 Lifecycle Management (ALM) system that manages your project's requirements, releases, 4. Using SpiraTest with Bugzilla ......... 48 test cases, issues and tasks in one unified environment. SpiraTeam® contains all of the 5. Using SpiraTest with MS-TFS ........ 60 features provided by SpiraTest® - our highly acclaimed quality assurance system and 6. Using SpiraTest with FogBugz ....... 84 SpiraPlan® - our agile-enabled project management solution. 7. Using SpiraTeam with Mantis ......... 96 However, many organizations may be already 8. Using SpiraTeam with ClearQuest 107 using other bug-tracking systems and not want to have to migrate all their users over to 9. Using SpiraTeam with IBM RTC... 119 SpiraTeam. Therefore SpiraPlan, SpiraTest and SpiraTeam are capable of integrating with a 10. Using Spira with Axosoft 14+ ..... 127 variety of commercial and open-source bug- tracking systems. 11. Using SpiraTeam with Redmine . 138 This guide outlines how to integrate and use 12. Using Spira with VersionOne...... 149 SpiraTest, SpiraPlan and SpiraTeam in conjunction with other external Bug/Issue 13. Using Spira with OnTime 11 ....... 159 Tracking systems. 14. Using Spira with GitHub ............. 172 This guide assumes that the reader is familiar with both SpiraTeam and the appropriate tool 15.
  • Documentation for JIRA Administrators 7.0 Documentation for JIRA Administrators 7.0 2

    Documentation for JIRA Administrators 7.0 Documentation for JIRA Administrators 7.0 2

    Documentation for JIRA Administrators 7.0 Documentation for JIRA Administrators 7.0 2 Contents Installing JIRA applications . 6 JIRA application requirements . 6 Installing Java . 8 Supported platforms . 10 End of support announcements . 13 Installing JIRA applications on Windows . 16 Uninstalling JIRA applications from Windows . 21 Installing JIRA applications on Linux . 21 Uninstalling JIRA applications from Linux . 26 Connecting JIRA applications to a database . 26 Connecting JIRA applications to PostgreSQL . 27 Connecting JIRA applications to MySQL . 30 Connecting JIRA applications to Oracle . 35 Connecting JIRA applications to SQL Server 2008 . 37 Tuning database connections . 41 Surviving connection closures . 52 Switching databases . 54 Installing JIRA applications from an archive file on Windows, Linux or Solaris . 55 Installing JIRA Data Center . 58 Running the setup wizard . 62 JIRA applications and project types overview . 65 Licensing and application access . 68 License compatibility . 69 Extending JIRA applications . 70 Administering projects and links across multiple applications . 71 Integrating with development tools . 72 Administering Bitbucket and GitHub with JIRA applications . 76 Linking a Bitbucket or GitHub repository with JIRA . 77 Managing linked Bitbucket and GitHub accounts . 83 Enabling DVCS smart commits . 84 Configure Automatic Team Invites . 85 Synchronize an account . 86 Troubleshoot the DVCS Connector . 87 Integrating with collaboration tools . 91 Using AppLinks to link to other applications . 93 Integrating with other tools . 95 Listeners . 96 Managing add-ons . 98 Managing webhooks . 99 Services . 101 Upgrading JIRA applications . 102 Upgrading JIRA applications manually . 103 Upgrading JIRA applications with a fallback method . 109 Upgrading JIRA applications using a rapid upgrade method . 113 Skipping major versions when upgrading JIRA applications .
  • Agile Project Management Tools

    Agile Project Management Tools

    BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 19, No 4 Sofia 2019 Print ISSN: 1311-9702; Online ISSN: 1314-4081 DOI: 10.2478/cait-2019-0033 Agile Project Management Tools: A Brief Comprative View Deniz Özkan1,2, Alok Mishra2 1Havelsan, A.Ş., 06510, Mustafa Kemal, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey 2Department of Software Engineering, Atilim University, Turkey E-mails: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: Agile methodologies are becoming popular in software development. Managers are required to understand project’s progress and product quality without development documents. During Agile practices of the teams and organizations, Agile project management tools are frequently used. The use of such tools leads to achieving speed and efficiency, affects the quality of the software. The quality of final product is mostly related with to project management. Accordingly, the paper provides brief comparative perspective about the popular project management tools for agile projects. 16 popular Agile project management tools have been presented helping agile developers to plan and manage their tasks in an efficient manner. Taiga, Axosoft, Agielan, Planbox are more appropriate for start-up projects. The most twitted and most appreciated tools are reported as Jira, Trello, and VersionOne. SpiraTeam by Inflectra and Pivotal Tracker are other pricing and popular agile tools, providing flexibility to Agile developers and increase collaboration among team members. Keywords: Agile Methodologies, Agile Project Management Tool, Tools, Software Project Management. 1. Introduction Presently, Agile software development method is becoming popular as it helps organizations to develop software projects faster. Most organizations (71%), mention that by using this methodology, projects are 28% more successful than projects managed with traditional methods [1].
  • Buyers Guide Product Listings

    Buyers Guide Product Listings

    BUYERS GUIDE PRODUCT LISTINGS Visual Studio Magazine Buyers’ Guide Product Listings The 2009 Visual Studio Magazine Buyers’ Guide listings comprise more than 700 individual products and services, ranging from developer tooling and UI components to Web hosting and instructor-led training. Included for each product is contact and pricing information. Keep in mind that many products come in multiple SKUs and with varied license options, so it’s always a good idea to contact vendors directly for specific pricing. The developer tools arena is a vast and growing space. As such, we’re always on the prowl for new tools and vendors. Know of a product our readers might want to learn more about? E-mail us at [email protected]. BUG & FEATURE TRACKING Gemini—CounterSoft Starts at $1189 • countersoft.com • +44 (0)1753 824000 Rational ClearQuest—IBM Rational Software $1,810 • ibm.com/rational • 888-426-3774 IssueNet Intercept—Elsinore Technologies Call for price • elsitech.com • 866-866-0034 FogBugz 7.0—Fog Creek Software $199 • fogcreek.com • 888-364-2849; 212-279-2076 SilkPerformer—Borland Call for price • borland.com • 800-632-2864; 512-340-2200 OnTime 2009 Professional—Axosoft Starts at $795 for five users • axosoft.com • 800-653-0024; SourceOffSite 4.2—SourceGear 480-362-1900 $239 • sourcegear.com • 217-356-0105 Alexsys Team 2.10—Alexsys Surround SCM 2009—Seapine Software Starts at $145 • alexcorp.com • 888-880-2539; 781-279-0170 Call for price • seapine.com • 888-683-6456; 513-754-1655 AppLife DNA—Kinetic Jump Software TeamInspector—Borland
  • Estudos Preliminares

    Estudos Preliminares

    IGOR BESSA MENEZE PODER JUDICIÁRIO S JOSE MARIO VIANA JUSTIÇA DO TRABALHO BARBOSA JUNIOR LENIVIA TRIBUNAL REGIONAL DO TRABALHO DA 7ª REGIÃO DE CASTRO E SILVA MENDES FRANCISC O JONATHAN SECRETARIA DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO E COMUNICAÇÃO REBOUCAS MAIA Estudos Preliminares Contratação de Suporte Técnico, incluindo atualizações evolutivas e corretivas, para a ferramenta Atlassian Jira e Plugins eazyBI Reports and Charts e Git Integration. Estudos Preliminares - Contratação de Suporte Técnico, incluindo atualizações evolutivas e corretivas, para a ferramenta Atlassian Jira e Plugins eazyBI Reports and Charts e Git Integration. 1 PODER JUDICIÁRIO JUSTIÇA DO TRABALHO TRIBUNAL REGIONAL DO TRABALHO DA 7ª REGIÃO SECRETARIA DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO E COMUNICAÇÃO Sumário ANÁLISE DE VIABILIDADE DA CONTRATAÇÃO (Art.14) 4 Contextualização 4 Definição e Especificação dos Requisitos da Demanda (Art. 14, I) 5 Requisitos de Negócio 5 Requisitos Técnicos 6 Requisitos Temporais 6 Soluções Disponíveis no Mercado de TIC (Art. 14, I, a) 7 Contratações Públicas Similares (Art. 14, I, b) 10 Outras Soluções Disponíveis (Art. 14, II, a) 11 Portal do Software Público Brasileiro (Art. 14, II, b) 11 Alternativa no Mercado de TIC (Art. 14, II, c) 12 Modelo Nacional de Interoperabilidade – MNI (Art. 14, II, d) 12 Infraestrutura de Chaves Públicas Brasileira – ICP-Brasil (Art. 14, II, e) 12 Modelo de Requisitos Moreq-Jus (Art. 14, II, f) 12 Análise Comparativa dos Custos das Soluções (Art. 14, III) 12 Escolha e Justificativa da Solução (Art. 14, IV) 15 Descrição da Solução (Art. 14, IV,a) 21 Alinhamento da Solução (Art. 14, IV, b) 22 Benefícios Esperados (Art. 14, IV, c) 22 Relação entre a Demanda Prevista e a Contratada (Art.
  • Agile Project Management Software Agile Project Management Buyer’S Guide

    Agile Project Management Software Agile Project Management Buyer’S Guide

    A Publication From BUYER’S GUIDE AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUYER’S GUIDE Executive Summary The software-centric business model is quickly becoming pervasive in every industry, not just IT. As Jeff Gothelf, co-author of Lean UX, put it, “Software is eating the world.”1 Since the publication of the Agile Manifesto in 2001, the project management (PM) climate has experienced a gradual shift away from the traditional “waterfall” process and toward a more adaptive, Agile model. In the wake of this paradigm shift, many business managers and developers have begun searching both for knowledge of Agile and for practical Agile tools—whether to better manage the software development lifecycle (SDLC) or other non-IT projects. This buyer’s guide will define the methodology of Agile PM as well as the product market and compare four leading Agile PM solutions. Table Of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 JIRA Agile 6 Axosoft 7 Planbox 8 Assembla 9 Comparable Products 10 How to Choose a Product 2 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUYER’S GUIDE Introduction The rapid emergence of Agile software startups and corresponding business adoption has made the trend clear: people like Agile. Developers like it. Product owners like it. Customers don’t know it, but they like it, too, because they reap its benefits every day. A 2013 study by VersionOne stated that 76 percent of developers are using, or plan to use an Agile project management tool—a 9 percent increase from 2009.2 Agile actually isn’t a project management structure per se, although it is often referred to as such.
  • Design Options of Store-Oriented Software Ecosystems: an Investigation of Business Decisions ∗

    Design Options of Store-Oriented Software Ecosystems: an Investigation of Business Decisions ∗

    Design Options of Store-Oriented Software Ecosystems: An Investigation of Business Decisions ∗ Bahar Jazayeri1, Olaf Zimmermann2, Gregor Engels1, Jochen K¨uster3, Dennis Kundisch1, Daniel Szopinski1 1 Paderborn University, Germany fbahar.jazayeri,gregor.engels,dennis.kundisch,[email protected] 2 University of Applied Sciences of Eastern Switzerland, Switzerland [email protected] 3 Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Germany [email protected] Abstract. Nowadays companies like Apple create ecosystems of third- party providers and users around their software platforms. Often online stores like Apple App Store are created to directly market third-party solutions. We call such ecosystems store-oriented software ecosystems. While the architecture of these ecosystems is mainly derived from busi- ness decisions of their owners, ecosystems with greatly different archi- tectural designs have been created. This diversity makes it challenging for future ecosystem providers to understand which architectural design is suitable to fulfill certain business decisions. In turn, opening a plat- form becomes risky while endangering intellectual property or scarifying quality of services. In this paper, we identify three main design options of store-oriented software ecosystems by classifying existing ecosystems based on similarities in their business decisions. We elaborate on the design options, discuss their main contributions, and provide exemplary ecosystems. Our work provides aspiring ecosystem providers with the reusable knowledge of existing ecosystems and helps them to take more informed architectural decisions and reduce risks in future. Keywords: Software ecosystems, Reusable designs, Variabilities 1 Introduction Software ecosystems have become an emerging architectural approach for many companies to grow. The term software ecosystem is inspired from ecological ecosystems that are the result of an interplay between organisms as well as interactions with a physical environment [1].