DOCSLIB.ORG

Software Development Process Improvements - Case QPR Software Plc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Software Development Process Improvements - Case QPR Software Plc Software development process improvements - Case QPR Software Plc Lidia Zalevskaya Master’s Thesis Degree Programme in Information Systems Management 2019 Abstract Date: 2019.11.24 Author(s) Lidia Zalevskaya Degree programme Information Systems Management, Master’s Degree Thesis title Number of pages and appendix pages Software development process improvements - 98 + 26 Case QPR Software Plc Initially this study was planned as an effort to improve on a software development process within an existing team using an existing product code and systems. However, the situation changed and a new team (DevApps team) was established and given a new project, which created an opportunity to build a new type of team, product, process, and tools pipeline from scratch utilizing the improvement ideas. An Action Research framework was adopted as the theoretical approach for the study, while the Scrum methodology served as a framework for the development practices. The study began by summarizing previously identified problems in the software development process at QPR Software Plc and formulating improvement ideas focused on the coding workflow and Scrum practices. These were then tested in practice by the new DevApps scrum team. The research analysis centres on the process of choosing and setting up the new team’s development tools, figuring out ways of working, and implementing several iterations to find the best suitable development process. The most valuable empirical outcomes were the creation of a branching strategy and Git workflow for the DevApps team, the team members’ practical experience of working with Git and with the Azure DevOps developer services. A key outcome was the shift in many verification activities to earlier phases. Moreover, verification was enforced automatically by adopting the practice of changes being ‘pulled’ into the main development branch, rather than the previous practice of ‘pushing’ changes there. As well as understanding of the importance of integrating smaller code changes at a time, and learning to define and plan smaller work items. Adopting the Azure DevOps service to manage the development flow enabled much more convenient inline code reviewing. Another important outcome was the understanding of need to improve Product Backlog Grooming, which meant adding and enforcing stricter criteria for user stories, such as Definition of Ready for Implementation, and Definition of Done. The Agile Software Development is an iterative process, which is consistent with the report structure of Action Research. At the time of writing this report, the practical implementation has been ongoing for 3.5 months. The team were able to set up an initial process and tools, though further improvements are expected to follow in subsequent iterations. The preliminary observations have been shared with the rest of R&D at QPR Software, though it will take more time to crystalize the lessons learnt and to plan for other teams to utilize and apply those findings. Keywords Software development best practices, Scrum, software development workflow, git workflow, branching strategy, version control Abbreviations CD - continuous deployment CI - continuous integration DoD - definition of done E2E - end to end (usually about UI automatic tests) MVP - minimal viable product QA - quality assurance R&D - research and development, in QPR Software called also Products & Technologies. SDLC - software development life cycle SDT - software development task (work item in issue tracking system) SW - software TA - test automation UI - user interface VCS - Version control system WIP - work in progress Table of contents ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 TABLE OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 THE COMPANY AND THE PRODUCT ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 PERSONAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.3.1 Initial plan - main tasks (08.2019) ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 CHALLENGES ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................................................... 14 2 ITERATION 1: METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK, LITERATURE REVIEW, AND INITIAL PLAN ................. 15 2.1 METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AND STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Theory: action research...................................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Methods used in the study ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.2 LEADING CHANGE .................................................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.1 Theory: Leading Change. John Kotter (1995) ..................................................................................................... 17 2.2.2 Theory: “Island of freedom” ............................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.3 Theory: Main principles leading the process change effort ............................................................................... 18 2.2.4 Current process, workflow and branching strategy ........................................................................................... 20 2.2.5 Empirical: What needs to change and why ........................................................................................................ 22 2.3 INITIAL SCRUM PRACTICES: AUGUST - SEPTEMBER 2019 ITERATION .................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Theory: Tuckman's stages of group development ............................................................................................. 30 2.3.2 Team kick-off: Create a cultural manifesto for the DevApps scrum team ......................................................... 32 2.3.3 Team kick-off: Create working contract for the Scrum team ............................................................................. 34 2.3.4 Practical plan: Initial Scrum process setup ......................................................................................................... 34 2.4 THEORY: VERSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND THE DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW ...................................................... 38 2.4.1 What are version control systems (VCS) and how do they compare? ................................................................ 38 2.4.2 Choosing a version control system and provider, CI/CD system (tools pipeline)................................................ 40 3 RETROSPECTIVE .......................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.1 Retrospective comments analysis 29.07-6.09.2019 ........................................................................................... 44 3.2 Agreed adjustments ........................................................................................................................................... 46 4 ITERATION 2: SEPTEMBER 2019 ..................................................................................................................................... 48 4.1 ORGANIZE ISSUE TRACKING AND WORK MANAGEMENT (BACKLOG, EPICS, STORIES, TASKS) ............................. 48 4.1.1 Epic - Feature - Story/Topic - Task ...................................................................................................................... 48 4.2 AGREE ON THE CODING WORKFLOW AND BRANCHING STRATEGY ...................................................................... 49 4.2.1 Questions and Conceptual decisions to make .................................................................................................... 50 4.2.2 Theory: Available Git workflow options ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tortoisemerge a Diff/Merge Tool for Windows Version 1.11
    TortoiseMerge A diff/merge tool for Windows Version 1.11 Stefan Küng Lübbe Onken Simon Large TortoiseMerge: A diff/merge tool for Windows: Version 1.11 by Stefan Küng, Lübbe Onken, and Simon Large Publication date 2018/09/22 18:28:22 (r28377) Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................ vi 1. TortoiseMerge is free! ....................................................................................................... vi 2. Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................. vi 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. TortoiseMerge's History .................................................................................................... 1 2. Basic Concepts .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Viewing and Merging Differences ...................................................................................... 3 2.2. Editing Conflicts ............................................................................................................. 3 2.3. Applying Patches ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Dynamic Software Configuration Management System
    1 A DYNAMIC SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY FATMA GULS¸AH¨ KANDEMIR˙ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING SEPTEMBER 2012 Approval of the thesis: A DYNAMIC SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM submitted by FATMA GULS¸AH¨ KANDEMIR˙ in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Engineering Department, Middle East Technical Uni- versity by, Prof. Dr. Canan Ozgen¨ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Adnan Yazıcı Head of Department, Computer Engineering Assoc. Prof. Ali Hikmet Dogru˘ Supervisor, Computer Engineering Dept., METU Dr. Cengiz Erbas¸ Co-supervisor, ASELSAN Examining Committee Members: Assoc. Prof. Ahmet Cos¸ar Computer Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Ali Hikmet Dogru˘ Computer Engineering Dept., METU Dr. Cengiz Erbas¸ ASELSAN Assoc. Prof. Pınar S¸enkul Computer Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Halit Oguzt˘ uz¨ un¨ Computer Engineering Dept., METU Date: I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: FATMA GULS¸AH¨ KANDEMIR˙ Signature : iii ABSTRACT A DYNAMIC SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Kandemir, Fatma Guls¸ah¨ M.S., Department of Computer Engineering Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Ali Hikmet Dogru˘ Co-Supervisor : Dr. Cengiz Erbas¸ September 2012, 70 pages Each software project requires a specialized management to handle software development activities throughout the project life cycle successfully and efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Management Software March 2019
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE MARCH 2019 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining Project Management Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 22 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis minimum qualifying score of 3.96 Tis a data-driven assessment for Usability and 3.91 for User identifying products in the Project Recommended, while the Small Management software market that Vendor graphic had a minimum offer the best capability and value qualifying score of 4.55 for Usability for small businesses. For a given and 4.38 for User Recommended. market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) To be considered for the Project and User Recommended (y-axis). Management FrontRunners, a FrontRunners then plots 10-15 product needed a minimum of 20 products each on a Small Vendor user reviews published within 18 and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, months of the evaluation period. based on vendor business size, per Products needed a minimum user category. rating score of 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both In the Project Management the Small and Enterprise graphics. FrontRunners infographic, the Enterprise Vendor graphic had a 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE roject management software and document management, as well Phelps organizations manage as at least one of the following: time and deliver projects on time, on tracking, budgeting, and resource budget and within scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Create a Pull Request in Bitbucket
    Create A Pull Request In Bitbucket Waverley is unprofitably bombastic after longsome Joshuah swings his bentwood bounteously. Despiteous Hartwell fathomsbroaches forcibly. his advancements institutionalized growlingly. Barmiest Heywood scandalize some dulocracy after tacit Peyter From an effect is your own pull remote repo bitbucket create the event handler, the bitbucket opens the destination branch for a request, if i am facing is Let your pet see their branches, commit messages, and pull requests in context with their Jira issues. You listen also should the Commits tab at the top gave a skill request please see which commits are included, which provide helpful for reviewing big pull requests. Keep every team account to scramble with things, like tablet that pull then got approved, when the build finished, and negotiate more. Learn the basics of submitting a on request, merging, and more. Now we made ready just send me pull time from our seven branch. Awesome bitbucket cloud servers are some nifty solutions when pull request a pull. However, that story ids will show in the grasp on all specified stories. Workzone can move the trust request automatically when appropriate or a percentage of reviewers have approved andor on successful build results. To cost up the webhook and other integration parameters, you need two set although some options in Collaborator and in Bitbucket. Go ahead but add a quote into your choosing. If you delete your fork do you make a saw, the receiver can still decline your request ask the repository to pull back is gone. Many teams use Jira as the final source to truth of project management.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiraplan External Bug Tracking Integration Guide
    SpiraTest / SpiraTeam / SpiraPlan® | External Bug-Tracking Integration Guide Inflectra Corporation Date: July 8th, 2019 Contents Introduction SpiraTest® provides an integrated, holistic Introduction ........................................... 1 Quality Assurance (QA) management solution that manages requirements, tests and incidents 1. Setting up Data Synchronization ...... 2 in one environment, with complete traceability from inception to completion. 2. Using SpiraTeam with JIRA 5+ ........ 9 SpiraTeam® is an integrated Application 3. Using SpiraTeam with JIRA 3 / 4.... 34 Lifecycle Management (ALM) system that manages your project's requirements, releases, 4. Using SpiraTest with Bugzilla ......... 48 test cases, issues and tasks in one unified environment. SpiraTeam® contains all of the 5. Using SpiraTest with MS-TFS ........ 60 features provided by SpiraTest® - our highly acclaimed quality assurance system and 6. Using SpiraTest with FogBugz ....... 84 SpiraPlan® - our agile-enabled project management solution. 7. Using SpiraTeam with Mantis ......... 96 However, many organizations may be already 8. Using SpiraTeam with ClearQuest 107 using other bug-tracking systems and not want to have to migrate all their users over to 9. Using SpiraTeam with IBM RTC... 119 SpiraTeam. Therefore SpiraPlan, SpiraTest and SpiraTeam are capable of integrating with a 10. Using Spira with Axosoft 14+ ..... 127 variety of commercial and open-source bug- tracking systems. 11. Using SpiraTeam with Redmine . 138 This guide outlines how to integrate and use 12. Using Spira with VersionOne...... 149 SpiraTest, SpiraPlan and SpiraTeam in conjunction with other external Bug/Issue 13. Using Spira with OnTime 11 ....... 159 Tracking systems. 14. Using Spira with GitHub ............. 172 This guide assumes that the reader is familiar with both SpiraTeam and the appropriate tool 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Version Control of SAS Programs and SAS Data Sets Magnus Mengelbier, Limelogic Ltd, United Kingdom
    Simple Version Control of SAS Programs and SAS Data Sets Magnus Mengelbier, Limelogic Ltd, United Kingdom ABSTRACT SUBVERSION AND LIFE SCIENCES SAS data sets and programs that reside on the local network are most often stored using a simple Subversion can fit very well within Life Sciences and with a tweak here and there, the version and file system with no capability of version control, audit trail of changes and all the benefits. We revision control can be a foundation for a standard and compliant analytics environment and consider the possibility to capitalise on the capabilities of Subversion and other simple process. straightforward conventions to provide version control and an audit trail for SAS data sets, standard macro libraries and programs without changing the SAS environment. TRUNK –BRANCHES –TAGS OR DEV –QC -PROD INTRODUCTION The approach with trunk, branches and tags can also be used within reporting clinical trials, if outputs are standardized for a specific study and used in multiple reporting events. Most organisations will use the benefits of a local network drive, a mounted share or a dedicated SAS server file system to store and archive study data in multiple formats, analytical programs and trunk Pre-lock data and programs for reporting purposes their respective logs, outputs and deliverables. branch Deliverables for a specific reporting event such as Investigator Brochure A manual process is most often implemented to retain versions and snapshots of data, programs (IB), Investigational New Drug (IND), Clinical Study Reports (CSRs), etc and deliverables with varying degrees of success most often. Although not perfect, the process is tag Dry run, Database Lock, Draft Outputs, Final Outputs sufficient to a degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Trunk Based Development
    Trunk Based Development Tony Bjerstedt What are you going to learn? The problem with traditional branching strategies What is Trunk Based Development How does this help How does it work Some tools and techniques About Me Family Guy Photographer Architect & Developer Leader LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tbjerstedt Email: [email protected] Twitter @tbjerstedt LinkedIn Code Kawishiwi Falls, Ely, MN Branches Why Branch To separate development from support Maintain releases separately Release no code before its time “Continuous Integration is a software development practice where members of a team integrate their work frequently, usually each person integrates at least daily - leading to multiple integrations per day. Each integration is verified by an automated build (including test) to detect integration errors as quickly as possible. Many teams find that this approach leads to significantly reduced integration problems and allows a team to develop cohesive software more rapidly.” – Martin Fowler (Blog article, 2006) https://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html Branch Chaos Long lived branches Never ending sprints Code Freezes Merge Day Hell Approaches to Branching Microsoft Recommended: Standard Branch Plan https://www.infoq.com/news/2012/04/Branching-Guide/ Microsoft Recommended Code Promotion Plan https://www.infoq.com/news/2012/04/Branching-Guide/ Gitflow https://fpy.cz/pub/slides/git-workshop/#/step-1 Trunk Based Development https://www.gocd.org/2018/05/30/ci-microservices-feature-toggles-trunk-based-development/
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Project Management Tools
    BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 19, No 4 Sofia 2019 Print ISSN: 1311-9702; Online ISSN: 1314-4081 DOI: 10.2478/cait-2019-0033 Agile Project Management Tools: A Brief Comprative View Deniz Özkan1,2, Alok Mishra2 1Havelsan, A.Ş., 06510, Mustafa Kemal, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey 2Department of Software Engineering, Atilim University, Turkey E-mails: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: Agile methodologies are becoming popular in software development. Managers are required to understand project’s progress and product quality without development documents. During Agile practices of the teams and organizations, Agile project management tools are frequently used. The use of such tools leads to achieving speed and efficiency, affects the quality of the software. The quality of final product is mostly related with to project management. Accordingly, the paper provides brief comparative perspective about the popular project management tools for agile projects. 16 popular Agile project management tools have been presented helping agile developers to plan and manage their tasks in an efficient manner. Taiga, Axosoft, Agielan, Planbox are more appropriate for start-up projects. The most twitted and most appreciated tools are reported as Jira, Trello, and VersionOne. SpiraTeam by Inflectra and Pivotal Tracker are other pricing and popular agile tools, providing flexibility to Agile developers and increase collaboration among team members. Keywords: Agile Methodologies, Agile Project Management Tool, Tools, Software Project Management. 1. Introduction Presently, Agile software development method is becoming popular as it helps organizations to develop software projects faster. Most organizations (71%), mention that by using this methodology, projects are 28% more successful than projects managed with traditional methods [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Buyers Guide Product Listings
    BUYERS GUIDE PRODUCT LISTINGS Visual Studio Magazine Buyers’ Guide Product Listings The 2009 Visual Studio Magazine Buyers’ Guide listings comprise more than 700 individual products and services, ranging from developer tooling and UI components to Web hosting and instructor-led training. Included for each product is contact and pricing information. Keep in mind that many products come in multiple SKUs and with varied license options, so it’s always a good idea to contact vendors directly for specific pricing. The developer tools arena is a vast and growing space. As such, we’re always on the prowl for new tools and vendors. Know of a product our readers might want to learn more about? E-mail us at [email protected]. BUG & FEATURE TRACKING Gemini—CounterSoft Starts at $1189 • countersoft.com • +44 (0)1753 824000 Rational ClearQuest—IBM Rational Software $1,810 • ibm.com/rational • 888-426-3774 IssueNet Intercept—Elsinore Technologies Call for price • elsitech.com • 866-866-0034 FogBugz 7.0—Fog Creek Software $199 • fogcreek.com • 888-364-2849; 212-279-2076 SilkPerformer—Borland Call for price • borland.com • 800-632-2864; 512-340-2200 OnTime 2009 Professional—Axosoft Starts at $795 for five users • axosoft.com • 800-653-0024; SourceOffSite 4.2—SourceGear 480-362-1900 $239 • sourcegear.com • 217-356-0105 Alexsys Team 2.10—Alexsys Surround SCM 2009—Seapine Software Starts at $145 • alexcorp.com • 888-880-2539; 781-279-0170 Call for price • seapine.com • 888-683-6456; 513-754-1655 AppLife DNA—Kinetic Jump Software TeamInspector—Borland
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Project Management Software Agile Project Management Buyer’S Guide
    A Publication From BUYER’S GUIDE AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUYER’S GUIDE Executive Summary The software-centric business model is quickly becoming pervasive in every industry, not just IT. As Jeff Gothelf, co-author of Lean UX, put it, “Software is eating the world.”1 Since the publication of the Agile Manifesto in 2001, the project management (PM) climate has experienced a gradual shift away from the traditional “waterfall” process and toward a more adaptive, Agile model. In the wake of this paradigm shift, many business managers and developers have begun searching both for knowledge of Agile and for practical Agile tools—whether to better manage the software development lifecycle (SDLC) or other non-IT projects. This buyer’s guide will define the methodology of Agile PM as well as the product market and compare four leading Agile PM solutions. Table Of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 JIRA Agile 6 Axosoft 7 Planbox 8 Assembla 9 Comparable Products 10 How to Choose a Product 2 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUYER’S GUIDE Introduction The rapid emergence of Agile software startups and corresponding business adoption has made the trend clear: people like Agile. Developers like it. Product owners like it. Customers don’t know it, but they like it, too, because they reap its benefits every day. A 2013 study by VersionOne stated that 76 percent of developers are using, or plan to use an Agile project management tool—a 9 percent increase from 2009.2 Agile actually isn’t a project management structure per se, although it is often referred to as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight MFR By
    Manufacturers, Publishers and Suppliers by Product Category 11/6/2017 10/100 Hubs & Switches ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS CIS SECURE COMPUTING INC DIGIUM GEAR HEAD 1 TRIPPLITE ASUS Cisco Press D‐LINK SYSTEMS GEFEN 1VISION SOFTWARE ATEN TECHNOLOGY CISCO SYSTEMS DUALCOMM TECHNOLOGY, INC. GEIST 3COM ATLAS SOUND CLEAR CUBE DYCONN GEOVISION INC. 4XEM CORP. ATLONA CLEARSOUNDS DYNEX PRODUCTS GIGAFAST 8E6 TECHNOLOGIES ATTO TECHNOLOGY CNET TECHNOLOGY EATON GIGAMON SYSTEMS LLC AAXEON TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AUDIOCODES, INC. CODE GREEN NETWORKS E‐CORPORATEGIFTS.COM, INC. GLOBAL MARKETING ACCELL AUDIOVOX CODI INC EDGECORE GOLDENRAM ACCELLION AVAYA COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS EDITSHARE LLC GREAT BAY SOFTWARE INC. ACER AMERICA AVENVIEW CORP COMMUNICATION DEVICES INC. EMC GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY ACTI CORPORATION AVOCENT COMNET ENDACE USA H3C Technology ADAPTEC AVOCENT‐EMERSON COMPELLENT ENGENIUS HALL RESEARCH ADC KENTROX AVTECH CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE CABLE ENTERASYS NETWORKS HAVIS SHIELD ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS AXIOM MEMORY COMPU‐CALL, INC EPIPHAN SYSTEMS HAWKING TECHNOLOGY ADDERTECHNOLOGY AXIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER LAB EQUINOX SYSTEMS HERITAGE TRAVELWARE ADD‐ON COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AZIO CORPORATION COMPUTERLINKS ETHERNET DIRECT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ADDON STORE B & B ELECTRONICS COMTROL ETHERWAN HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LT ADESSO BELDEN CONNECTGEAR EVANS CONSOLES HITACHI ADTRAN BELKIN COMPONENTS CONNECTPRO EVGA.COM HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS ADVANTECH AUTOMATION CORP. BIDUL & CO CONSTANT TECHNOLOGIES INC Exablaze HOO TOO INC AEROHIVE NETWORKS BLACK BOX COOL GEAR EXACQ TECHNOLOGIES INC HP AJA VIDEO SYSTEMS BLACKMAGIC DESIGN USA CP TECHNOLOGIES EXFO INC HP INC ALCATEL BLADE NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CPS EXTREME NETWORKS HUAWEI ALCATEL LUCENT BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES CREATIVE LABS EXTRON HUAWEI SYMANTEC TECHNOLOGIES ALLIED TELESIS BLUE COAT SYSTEMS CRESTRON ELECTRONICS F5 NETWORKS IBM ALLOY COMPUTER PRODUCTS LLC BOSCH SECURITY CTC UNION TECHNOLOGIES CO FELLOWES ICOMTECH INC ALTINEX, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bug Tracker Net Documentation
    Bug Tracker Net Documentation Piscatorial and platelike Jean-Pierre backwash rigorously and immerge his pup pausingly and qualmishly. Glaucescent and nicotinic Sayers meditates anachronistically and reregulating his Bruges redolently and unemotionally. Jurassic Miguel befool whitely while Stevie always dedicating his squeezers marauds unthankfully, he miring so monumentally. The targeted project issue date. The predefined values should put left alone. Default user preference to enable filtering based on issue severity. Your comment has been received. Mantis Bug Tracker REST API Postman. It might been released, settings, you create and wade a script. NET Framework XML classes to steep and manipulate the data assess them. Compare to other products or configurations, take their moment to browse these introductory docs. Try upgrading to the latest stable version. The consider of filter fields to buy per row. We erect not, schedules, an object will be flagged. Alternatively, hence, we to submit a report back soon please report cannot be displayed on to main window. Automate data source between Sheets and Tracker. NET, remainder of the bugs are readable, their description etc in the cemetery of reports from time start time. It will no longer if possible login using this account. Then what problem behavior be solved more promptly. Someone hijacked my Google account. Kanban board for visualizing your project timeline. Default value list ON. The default value somewhere ON. Google users are affected. Specifies the LDAP or Active Directory server to key to. You can afford click the Updated column heading to which most recently updated issues at our top along the search results.
    [Show full text]