22 BACK PAGE law stories 5 October 2018 | www.newlawjournal.co.uk

Hamilton tells the story like a modern Hamilton for lawyers #3 lawyer, deploying witness statements and skeleton arguments. He exhibits various pieces of correspondence in an accompanying bundle. He uses presentational tricks which are not unfamiliar from the modus operandi of current US politicians. He attacks his opponents and accusers with uncompromising aggression. He portrays himself constantly as the wronged party. He is the one deserving of sympathy, having been cruelly seduced, artfully blackmailed and then forced to reveal his misdeeds to his devoted and innocent wife. He attributed the attack on him to the ‘spirit of Jacobinism,’ which, ‘incessantly busy in undermining all the props of public security and private happiness… seems to

© Geoff Pugh/REX/Shutterstock threaten the political and moral world with a complete overthrow.’ He refers to his accusers Richard Harrison considers Hamilton’s written advocacy as ‘the Jacobin scandal club’ and loses no skills as exemplified in The Reynolds Pamphlet opportunity to emphasise their malice and lack of principles, while he constantly belittles Reynolds and his wife as both vile lexander Hamilton was a soldier, continued with Hamilton feeling very much and insignificant. Where he exhibits letters a politician and, notably, a lawyer. the vulnerable party: ‘All the appearances of from them, which have neither his prosaic Articles in this series, inspired by violent attachment, and of agonising distress elegance nor his prolixity, he seems to revel ALin-Manuel Miranda’s eponymous at the idea of a relinquishment, were played in their relative illiteracy. He comments on hip-hop musical, have already touched on off with a most imposing art. This, though the correspondence as if he were the victim his negotiating skills (‘The Room Where It it did not make me entirely the dupe of the of a highly sophisticated plot: he describes Happens’), his advocacy in the many essays plot, yet kept me in a state of irresolution.’ one letter, presumably sarcastically, as a he wrote as part of The Federalist Papers To cut a long story short (and Hamilton ‘masterpiece’. He tries to extract pity as on behalf of his adopted client, the new US makes it long), he ended up being subject he refers ‘the obliging co-operation of the constitution (‘Hamilton for lawyers’, 167 NLJ to blackmail threats from Mr Reynolds and husband with his wife to aliment and keep 7761, p22), and the way in which his ‘Ten made certain payments. Following political alive my connection with her.’ Duel Commandments’ can form the basis for manoeuvrings over several years (‘We With regard to his own shortcomings, a theory of litigation (‘Hamilton for lawyers Know’), information about the payments he recognises them, but also portrays #2’, NLJ 23 February 2018, p22). was leaked, together with the insinuation himself as a man overcome by irresistible However, his most notable piece of written that he had used federal funds to engage in temptations. His susceptibility is portrayed advocacy, and one he deployed entirely speculation and corruption. as somehow heroic: ‘I cannot be the in his own interests, is found in the work He bit the bullet, employed his formidable apologist of any vice because the ardour of entitled Observations on certain documents writing and advocacy skills, and produced passion may have made it mine.’ contained in no. V & VI of “The History of the the pamphlet: a 37-page first-person So Hamilton was able to extract himself United States for the Year 1796,” in which chronicle of the affair, plus 58 more pages of from a financial scandal by confessing the charge of speculation against Alexander supplementary documents. He aimed to set to a sexual one; drawing the sting of the Hamilton, late secretary of the Treasury, is the record straight: he admitted to sexual allegations by viciously attacking both fully refuted. Written by himself. Or, more wrongdoing but made it clear that he had his accusers and his blackmailers whilst briefly and famously, and providing the title not engaged in any financial corruption. wallowing in self-pity and trying to garner for a song: The Reynolds Pamphlet. He used the public relations technique of sympathy from all. The pamphlet did little ‘getting the information out’ and went into for the tranquillity of his marriage to Eliza Say no to this excruciating detail in doing so. as is clear from the passionate outpourings Hamilton, among his many in the showstopper (and presumably soon to accomplishments, was something of a ladies’ Modern techniques be regular female audition piece) ‘Burn’. man; while his family was away during the The detail was part of the advocacy As Hamilton’s chorus of enemies in the summer of 1791, he got embroiled with technique: although judges these days tend show—Jefferson, Burr and Madison—make one Maria Reynolds who initially asked to deplore verbosity, there is something clear, the admitted scandal provided (with him for financial assistance. The fact that about thoroughly prepared and meticulously a degree of deliberate ambiguity) ‘one he happened to be the secretary to the US presented detailed submissions which may less thing to worry about’ and put paid to Treasury at the time was a notable risk have a persuasive effect on the tribunal. The any ambitions for the presidency. This is a factor. The story is told in the song ‘Say No technique aims to create the impression that, consequence of sexual scandal which was to This’ (he didn’t), and in his own words if the advocate knows this much about the clearly not so inevitable 220 years later. NLJ in the narrative of the pamphlet: ‘…it was facts and issues and has the references at his quickly apparent that other than pecuniary fingertips, then maybe there is something in Richard Harrison is a partner at Laytons LLP consolation would be acceptable.’ The affair the case after all. (www.laytons.com).